StemCell Therapy

NATICK, Massachusetts Researchers at an Army institute are more than halfway through a major study of what causes injuries in new recruits and what can be done about it.

Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, or USARIEM, Research Physiologists Julie Hughes and Stephen Foulis recently spoke with Army Times about the effort, which has so far studied 2,291 recruits with a goal of tracking 4,000 recruits for two years from basic training forward.

Some early findings show that, on average, the overall body weight of recruits didnt change dramatically during basic training. But both body fat and muscle mass did.

Early data shows that Army recruits through basic training increase their lean muscle mass by about 4 percent and decrease their body fat by about 15 percent.

While women make up less than 20 percent of enlisted recruits, according to a 2018 study on demographics of the U.S. military released by the Council on Foreign Relations, the study is trying to overrepresent the female population in order to answer questions on female soldier injury rates, Hughes said.

But, there are already promising data being analyzed that shows that recruit training benefits female recruits, resulting in lower body fat and higher lean muscle mass than their civilian counterparts in a just a few weeks of training.

The body composition and bone/muscle measurements will continue. But the next step will be a sleep study starting early next year, researchers said.

Hughes and Foulis are in the institutes Military Performance Division and worked with a team of about 20 researchers have traveled to both Fort Jackson, South Carolina and Fort Sill, Oklahoma to take bone scans and other tests to see what effects basic training is having, both positive and negative, on recruits.

Sign up for the Army Times Daily News Roundup Don't miss the top Army stories, delivered each afternoon

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Army Times Daily News Roundup.

The aim is to determine, based on a host of characteristics, which recruits are more susceptible to injury and what interventions Army leaders might be able to take to prevent those injuries.

Ultimately, the goal is to put their data together and create algorithms that can better predict what part of the recruit population my have injury risks or problems in training.

Both researchers emphasized that the work is not to exclude anyone from training due to risks, but instead to identify factors they can adjust to prevent injuries, whether thats better nutrition, different types of events at different times of the training cycle or other ways to better prepare recruits for periods in which injuries might occur, such as progressive loading for ruck marches.

How do you alter the training environment for that person or for everyone to do better? Hughes said.

An added bonus is to push further with the research and find ways to optimize training to increase performance through better preventative steps.

The most recently released data from January showed that the study had conducted 2,000 tibia scans and collected more than 37,172 results from blood tests.

Subjects of the study had to do balance testing and vertical jumps so that researchers could also measure their strength and flexibility.

While there have been many theories behind some of the prevalence of basic training injuries, it wasnt until recent years that technological advances allowed for detailed measurements to take place.

Scientists can now measure intricate levels of bone density and see how it changes under stress through the nine-week basic training cycle.

The study began in 2017 at Fort Jackson and has expanded to Fort Sill since then, researcher said. Testing throughout the study measures bone density measures and body composition.

In early 2018, the Army introduced the Performance Readiness Bar to add more calcium and other nutrition supplements. Recruits are given the bar as an option to eat but researchers in this study will track if theyre actually consuming it and if there are effects of the extra calcium on injuries.

But what contributes to injury is far more complex than the density of bone or the composition of muscle and fat. Thats why researchers are looking at nutrition, fitness, sex, genetics, menstrual history, neurobehavioral social factors and sleep.

Neurobehavioral factors can be boiled down to somewhat subjective terms such as grit or resiliency, which are hard to measure but could play large roles in success.

Maybe somebody whos really getting after it has more of a risk injury, Foulis said. Or maybe because of that theyre at a lower risk of injury.

The sleep portion of the study will begin early next year, researchers said.

Another question researchers are trying to answer is why female recruits currently suffer higher injury rates than their male colleagues.

The study came from a partnership with the Armys Training and Doctrine Command and the Center for Initial Military Training.

Both of which had been involved with USARIEM in past work such as the Physical Demands Study. That study and another, the Occupational Physical Assessment Test Validation Study helped inform the OPAT in use today.

An estimated 1,200 trainees took part in the two studies, Mallory Roussel, USARIEM, spokeswoman told Army Times.

Foulis was a part of that project. In the study, researchers took three groups of an estimated 50 soldiers. Those groups completed eight simulated tasks four times over a two-week period.

Some of the tasks included a sandbag carry, casualty evacuation from a vehicle turret, casualty drag, movement under direct fire, stowing ammunition on a tank, loading the tanks main gun, transferring ammo from field artillery supply vehicles and finishing a 4-mile foot march.

The hands-on collection of initial entry information from recruits should wrap up by late 2020 and the two-year tracking will then end by late 2022. Researchers expect to release the full five-year study results by 2023.

Go here to see the original:
This study seeks to find out why recruits get injured and what can the Army do about it - ArmyTimes.com

This entry was posted on November 11, 2019 at 11:46 am and is filed under Preventative Medicine. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |