People with blood type O may be less vulnerable to COVID-19 and have a reduced likelihood of getting severely ill, according to two studies published Wednesday. Experts say more research is needed.The research provides further evidence that blood type (also known as blood group) may play a role in a person's susceptibility to infection and their chance of having a severe bout of the disease. The reasons for this link aren't clear and more research is needed to say what implications, if any, it has for patients.Studies add to growing evidenceA Danish study found that among 7,422 people who tested positive for COVID-19, only 38.4% were blood type O even though, among a group of 2.2 million people who were not tested, that blood type made up 41.7% of the population.By contrast, 44.4% of group A tested positive, while in the wider Danish population that blood type makes up 42.4%.In the other study, researchers in Canada found that among 95 patients critically ill with COVID-19, a higher proportion with blood type A or AB 84% required mechanical ventilation compared with patients with blood group O or B, which was 61%.The Canadian study also found those with blood type A or AB had a longer stay in the intensive care unit, a median of 13.5 days, compared with those with blood group O or B, who had a median of nine days."As a clinician ... it is at the back of my mind when I look at patients and stratify them. But in terms of a definitive marker we need repeated findings across many jurisdictions that show the same thing," said Dr. Mypinder Sekhon, an intensive care physician at Vancouver General Hospital and an author of the Canadian study."I don't think this supersedes other risk factors of severity like age and co-morbities and so forth," added Sekhon, who is also a clinical assistant professor in the Division of Critical Care Medicine and Department of Medicine at the University of British Columbia."If one is blood group A, you don't need to start panicking. And if you're blood group O, you're not free to go to the pubs and bars."No need to worryMost humans fall into one of four blood groups: A, B, AB or O. In the United States, the most common blood groups are O and A.It makes very little difference to most people's daily lives unless you have to have a blood transfusion. Nor should people worry unduly about the link between blood type and COVID-19, said Dr. Torben Barington, the senior author of the Danish paper and a clinical professor at Odense University Hospital and the University of Southern Denmark."We do not know whether this is some kind of protection of group O, or whether it's some kind of vulnerability in the other blood groups," he said."I think this has scientific interest, and when we find out what the mechanism is, perhaps we're able to use that proactively in some way in regard to treatment."In the Danish study, researchers analyzed data on Danish individuals who were tested between February 27 and July 30, and the distribution of blood types among those people was compared with data from people who had not been tested. They found that blood group wasn't a risk factor for hospitalization or death from COVID-19.Both studies were published in the journal Blood Advances.While there are several theories, researchers don't yet know what mechanism could explain the link between different blood groups and COVID-19.Sekhon said it could be explained by people with blood type O having less of a key clotting factor making them less prone to coagulation problems in the blood. Clotting has been a major driver of the severity of COVID-19.Other possible explanations involve blood group antigens and how they affect the production of infection fighting antibodies. Or it could be linked to genes associated with blood types and their effect on receptors in the immune system."It's a repeated, interesting scientific observation that really warrants further mechanistic work," he said.'Important research question'The findings of the two new studies provide "more converging evidence that blood type may play a role in a person's susceptibility to COVID infection and their chance of having a severe bout of COVID-19," said Dr. Amesh Adalja, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security in Baltimore, who was not involved in either of the studies.A separate study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine in June, found genetic data in some COVID-19 patients and healthy people suggesting that those with Type A blood had a higher risk of becoming infected, and those with type O blood were at a lower risk.That previous genetic study, paired with the two new studies in Blood Advances, are "suggestive that this is a real phenomenon that we're seeing," said Adalja, whose work is focused on emerging infectious disease."While we're not quite to the point where this is ironclad, it's clearly suggestive, and we have not seen anything inconsistent with this. The same pattern has been emerging with O blood type tending to be the one that's standing out," Adalja said.Adalja said that blood types and their susceptibility to various infections have been studied in the medical literature before. For instance, research suggests that people with blood type O appear to be more susceptible to norovirus infection.As for the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, "We need to figure out the mechanism and understand it at the molecular level to be able to say for sure how this is occurring that this is really the O blood type and not something that kind of tracks with O blood type," Adalja said."We're starting to see enough now that I think it's an important research question to answer," he said. "There's more science to be done here, but it seems to me that there's more evidence accumulating for this hypothesis."
People with blood type O may be less vulnerable to COVID-19 and have a reduced likelihood of getting severely ill, according to two studies published Wednesday. Experts say more research is needed.
The research provides further evidence that blood type (also known as blood group) may play a role in a person's susceptibility to infection and their chance of having a severe bout of the disease. The reasons for this link aren't clear and more research is needed to say what implications, if any, it has for patients.
A Danish study found that among 7,422 people who tested positive for COVID-19, only 38.4% were blood type O even though, among a group of 2.2 million people who were not tested, that blood type made up 41.7% of the population.
By contrast, 44.4% of group A tested positive, while in the wider Danish population that blood type makes up 42.4%.
In the other study, researchers in Canada found that among 95 patients critically ill with COVID-19, a higher proportion with blood type A or AB 84% required mechanical ventilation compared with patients with blood group O or B, which was 61%.
The Canadian study also found those with blood type A or AB had a longer stay in the intensive care unit, a median of 13.5 days, compared with those with blood group O or B, who had a median of nine days.
"As a clinician ... it is at the back of my mind when I look at patients and stratify them. But in terms of a definitive marker we need repeated findings across many jurisdictions that show the same thing," said Dr. Mypinder Sekhon, an intensive care physician at Vancouver General Hospital and an author of the Canadian study.
"I don't think this supersedes other risk factors of severity like age and co-morbities and so forth," added Sekhon, who is also a clinical assistant professor in the Division of Critical Care Medicine and Department of Medicine at the University of British Columbia.
"If one is blood group A, you don't need to start panicking. And if you're blood group O, you're not free to go to the pubs and bars."
Most humans fall into one of four blood groups: A, B, AB or O. In the United States, the most common blood groups are O and A.
It makes very little difference to most people's daily lives unless you have to have a blood transfusion. Nor should people worry unduly about the link between blood type and COVID-19, said Dr. Torben Barington, the senior author of the Danish paper and a clinical professor at Odense University Hospital and the University of Southern Denmark.
"We do not know whether this is some kind of protection of group O, or whether it's some kind of vulnerability in the other blood groups," he said.
"I think this has scientific interest, and when we find out what the mechanism is, perhaps we're able to use that proactively in some way in regard to treatment."
In the Danish study, researchers analyzed data on Danish individuals who were tested between February 27 and July 30, and the distribution of blood types among those people was compared with data from people who had not been tested. They found that blood group wasn't a risk factor for hospitalization or death from COVID-19.
Both studies were published in the journal Blood Advances.
While there are several theories, researchers don't yet know what mechanism could explain the link between different blood groups and COVID-19.
Sekhon said it could be explained by people with blood type O having less of a key clotting factor making them less prone to coagulation problems in the blood. Clotting has been a major driver of the severity of COVID-19.
Other possible explanations involve blood group antigens and how they affect the production of infection fighting antibodies. Or it could be linked to genes associated with blood types and their effect on receptors in the immune system.
"It's a repeated, interesting scientific observation that really warrants further mechanistic work," he said.
The findings of the two new studies provide "more converging evidence that blood type may play a role in a person's susceptibility to COVID infection and their chance of having a severe bout of COVID-19," said Dr. Amesh Adalja, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security in Baltimore, who was not involved in either of the studies.
A separate study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine in June, found genetic data in some COVID-19 patients and healthy people suggesting that those with Type A blood had a higher risk of becoming infected, and those with type O blood were at a lower risk.
That previous genetic study, paired with the two new studies in Blood Advances, are "suggestive that this is a real phenomenon that we're seeing," said Adalja, whose work is focused on emerging infectious disease.
"While we're not quite to the point where this is ironclad, it's clearly suggestive, and we have not seen anything inconsistent with this. The same pattern has been emerging with O blood type tending to be the one that's standing out," Adalja said.
Adalja said that blood types and their susceptibility to various infections have been studied in the medical literature before. For instance, research suggests that people with blood type O appear to be more susceptible to norovirus infection.
As for the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, "We need to figure out the mechanism and understand it at the molecular level to be able to say for sure how this is occurring that this is really the O blood type and not something that kind of tracks with O blood type," Adalja said.
"We're starting to see enough now that I think it's an important research question to answer," he said. "There's more science to be done here, but it seems to me that there's more evidence accumulating for this hypothesis."
Go here to see the original:
People with blood type O may have lower risk of COVID-19 infection and severe illness, studies suggest - WCVB Boston
- Department of Genetic Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Research Services | Johns Hopkins Institute of Genetic Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Patient Care | Johns Hopkins Department of Genetic Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Specialty Clinics | Johns Hopkins Institute of Genetic Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Pediatric Genetic Medicine at Johns Hopkins Children's Center - January 6th, 2025
- Research Centers | Johns Hopkins Institute of Genetic Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- About Us - Johns Hopkins Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Graduate Programs & Training | Johns Hopkins Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Request an Appointment | Johns Hopkins Institute of Genetic Medicine - January 6th, 2025
- Clemson professor Trudy Mackay elected to the National Academy of Medicine - Clemson News - October 22nd, 2024
- Research sheds new light on the behavior of KRAS gene in pancreatic and colorectal cancer - News-Medical.Net - October 22nd, 2024
- Pushing the boundaries of rare disease diagnostics with the help of the first Undiagnosed Hackathon - Nature.com - October 22nd, 2024
- Tailored Genetic Medicine: AAV Gene Therapy and mRNA Vaccines Redefine Healthcare's Future - Intelligent Living - October 22nd, 2024
- The Genetic Link to Parkinson's Disease - Hopkins Medicine - August 27th, 2022
- Epic Bio makes gene therapies by editing the epigenome - Labiotech.eu - August 27th, 2022
- Ovid turns to gene therapy startup to restock drug pipeline - BioPharma Dive - August 27th, 2022
- Whole-exome analysis of 177 pediatric patients with undiagnosed diseases | Scientific Reports - Nature.com - August 27th, 2022
- First Gene Therapy for Adults with Severe Hemophilia A, BioMarin's ROCTAVIAN (valoctocogene roxaparvovec), Approved by European Commission (EC) -... - August 27th, 2022
- Arbor Biotechnologies Enters into Agreement with Acuitas Therapeutics for Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery System for Use in Rare Liver Diseases - BioSpace - August 27th, 2022
- ElevateBio Partners with the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine to Accelerate the Development of Regenerative Medicines - Business Wire - August 27th, 2022
- ElevateBio and the University of Pittsburgh Announce Creation of Pitt BioForge BioManufacturing Center at Hazelwood Green to Accelerate Cell and Gene... - August 27th, 2022
- Genetic variants cause different reactions to psychedelic therapy - The Well : The Well - The Well - August 27th, 2022
- Personalized Medicine for Prostate Cancer: What It Is and How It Works - Healthline - August 27th, 2022
- Four radical new fertility treatments just a few years away from clinics - The Guardian - August 27th, 2022
- Why are Rats Used in Medical Research? - MedicalResearch.com - August 27th, 2022
- The Columns Stepping Stones in STEM Washington and Lee University - The Columns - August 27th, 2022
- Study points to new approach to clearing toxic waste from brain Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Washington University School... - August 27th, 2022
- ALS Gene Therapy SynCav1 Found to Extend Survival in Mouse Model |... - ALS News Today - August 27th, 2022
- A New Kind of Chemo | The UCSB Current - The UCSB Current - August 27th, 2022
- Unraveling the mystery of who gets lung cancer and why - Genetic Literacy Project - June 16th, 2022
- How diet and the microbiome affect colorectal cancer - EurekAlert - June 16th, 2022
- Akouos Presents Nonclinical Data Supporting the Planned Clinical Development of AK-OTOF and Strategies for Regulated Gene Expression in the Inner Ear... - May 20th, 2022
- Money on the Move: SwanBio, Remix, Locus, Mirvie and More - BioSpace - May 20th, 2022
- DiNAQOR Opens DiNAMIQS Subsidiary to Partner with Gene Therapy Companies Bringing New Treatments to Patients - PR Newswire - May 20th, 2022
- Brain tumor growth may be halted with breast cancer drug - Medical News Today - May 20th, 2022
- LogicBio Therapeutics to Present at HC Wainwright Global Investment Conference - PR Newswire - May 20th, 2022
- Genascence Announces Data From Phase 1 Clinical Trial on GNSC-001, Company's Lead Program in Osteoarthritis, Presented at American Society of Gene... - May 20th, 2022
- Encoded Therapeutics Presents Nonclinical Data Showing Genomic Medicine Platform Yields Selective Expression to Optimize Gene Therapy Performance at... - May 20th, 2022
- California, Other States to Cover Rapid WGS of Newborns Under Medicaid, but Questions of Access Loom - GenomeWeb - May 20th, 2022
- Researchers Identify Role of 'Sonic the Hedgehog' Gene in Bone Repair - BioSpace - May 20th, 2022
- Targeting the Uneven Burden of Kidney Disease on Black Americans - The New York Times - May 20th, 2022
- ASC Therapeutics, U Mass Medical School, and the Clinic for Special Children Announce Podium Presentation of Safety and Efficacy in Murine and Bovine... - May 20th, 2022
- UC Davis Looks to Expand Genetic Breast Cancer Risk Education, Outreach for Hispanic Women - Precision Oncology News - May 20th, 2022
- Fly Researchers Find Another Layer to the Code of Life - Duke Today - May 20th, 2022
- CANbridge-UMass Chan Medical School Gene Therapy Research Presented at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (ASGCT) Annual Meeting - Business... - May 20th, 2022
- Omicron BA.4 and BA.5: What to know about the new variants - Medical News Today - May 20th, 2022
- Krystal Biotech to Present Additional Data on B-VEC from the GEM-3 Phase 3 Study at the Society for Investigative Dermatology Annual Meeting -... - May 20th, 2022
- FDA approves Lilly's Mounjaro (tirzepatide) injection, the first and only GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist for the treatment of adults with type 2... - May 20th, 2022
- Elucidating the developmental origin of life-sustaining adrenal glands | Penn Today - Penn Today - May 20th, 2022
- 5 questions facing gene therapy in 2022 - BioPharma Dive - January 17th, 2022
- In a First, Man Receives a Heart From a Genetically Altered Pig - The New York Times - January 17th, 2022
- Antibodies, Easy Single-Cell, Genomics for All: Notes from the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference - Bio-IT World - January 17th, 2022
- Using genetics to conserve wildlife - Pursuit - January 17th, 2022
- Genetics of sudden unexplained death in children - National Institutes of Health - January 17th, 2022
- Amicus Therapeutics Reports Preliminary 2021 Revenue and Provides 2022 Strategic Outlook and Revenue Guidance - Yahoo Finance - January 17th, 2022
- Maze Therapeutics Announces $190 Million Financing to Support the Advancement of Nine Precision Medicine Programs and Compass Platform for Genetically... - January 17th, 2022
- How The mRNA Vaccines Were Made: Halting Progress and Happy Accidents - The New York Times - January 17th, 2022
- Press Registration Is Now Open for the 2022 ACMG Annual Clinical Genetics Meeting - PRNewswire - January 17th, 2022
- A Novel Mutation in the TRPM4 Gene | RRCC - Dove Medical Press - January 17th, 2022
- Biomarkers and Candidate Therapeutic Drugs in Heart Failure | IJGM - Dove Medical Press - January 17th, 2022
- Genetic counseling program helps patients take control of their health - Medical University of South Carolina - June 24th, 2021
- One-year-old baby in UAE receives imported genetic medicine to treat rare disease - Gulf News - June 24th, 2021
- Black and non-Hispanic White Women Found to Have No Differences in Genetic Risk for Breast Cancer - Cancer Network - June 24th, 2021
- What's in your genes | The Crusader Newspaper Group - The Chicago Cusader - June 24th, 2021
- Immusoft Announces Formation of Scientific Advisory Board - Business Wire - June 24th, 2021
- Arrowhead Presents Positive Interim Clinical Data on ARO-HSD Treatment in Patients with Suspected NASH at EASL International Liver Congress - Business... - June 24th, 2021
- Pacific Biosciences and Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine Announce its First Research Collaboration for Whole - GlobeNewswire - June 24th, 2021
- Despite the challenges of COVID-19, Yale-PCCSM section members continued their work on scientific papers - Yale School of Medicine - June 24th, 2021
- Veritas Intercontinental: Genetics makes it possible to identify cardiovascular genetic risk and prevent cardiac accidents such as those that have... - June 24th, 2021
- New Research Uncovers How Cancers with Common Gene Mutation Develop Resistance to Targeted Drugs - Newswise - June 24th, 2021
- Celebrate the Third Annual Medical Genetics Awareness Week April 13-16, 2021 - PRNewswire - February 14th, 2021
- How will WNY fare in the race between vaccines and coronavirus variants? - Buffalo News - February 14th, 2021
- Myriad Genetics to Participate in Multiple Upcoming Health and Technology Conferences - GlobeNewswire - February 14th, 2021
- ASCO GU 2021: The Landscape of Genetic Alterations Using ctDNA-based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Pat... - UroToday - February 14th, 2021
- The Human Genome and the Making of a Skeptical Biologist - Scientific American - February 14th, 2021
- Breast Cancer Gene Mutations Found in 30% of All Women - Medscape - February 1st, 2021
- Mysterious untreatable fevers once devastated whole families. This doctor discovered what caused them - CNN - February 1st, 2021
- CCMB team identifies variants of genes that metabolise drugs - BusinessLine - February 1st, 2021
- NeuBase Therapeutics Announces Acquisition of Gene Modulating Technology from Vera Therapeutics - GlobeNewswire - February 1st, 2021
- Copy number variations linked to autism have diverse but overlapping effects - Spectrum - February 1st, 2021