header logo image


Page 946«..1020..945946947948..960970..»

Genetically Engineering Pigs to Grow Organs for People – The Atlantic

August 10th, 2017 2:45 pm

The idea of transplanting organs from pigs into humans has been around for a long time. And for a long time, xenotransplantsor putting organs from one species into anotherhas come up against two seemingly insurmountable problems.

The first problem is fairly intuitive: Pig organs provoke a massive and destructive immune response in humansfar more so than an organ from another person. The second problem is less obvious: Pig genomes are rife with DNA sequences of viruses that can infect human cells. In the 1990s, the pharmaceutical giant Novartis planned to throw as much $1 billion at animal-to-human transplant research, only to shutter its research unit after several years of failed experiments.

Quite suddenly, however, solving these two problems has become much easier and much faster thanks to the gene-editing technology CRISPR. With CRISPR, scientists can knock out the pig genes that trigger the human immune response. And they can inactivate the virusescalled porcine endogenous retroviruses, or PERVsthat lurk in the pig genome.

On Thursday, scientists working for a startup called eGenesis reported the birth of 37 PERV-free baby pigs in China, 15 of them still surviving. The black-and-white piglets are now several months old, and they belong to a breed of miniature pigs that will grow no bigger than 150 poundswith organs just the right size for transplant into adult humans.

eGenesis spun out of the lab of the Harvard geneticist George Church, who previously reported inactivating 62 copies of PERV from pig cells in 2015. But the jump from specialized pig cells that grow well in labs to living PERV-free piglets wasnt easy.

We didnt even know we could have viable pigs, says Luhan Yang, a former graduate student in Churchs lab and co-founder of eGenesis. When her team first tried to edit all 62 copies in pig cells that they wanted to turn into embryos, the cells died. They were more sensitive than the specialized cell lines. Eventually Yang and her team figured out a chemical cocktail that could keep these cells alive through the gene-editing process. This technique could be useful in large-scale gene-editing projects unrelated to xenotransplants, too.

When Yang and her team first inactivated PERV from cells in a lab, my colleague Ed Yong suggested that the work was an example of CRISPRs power rather than a huge breakthrough in pig-to-human transplants, given the challenges of immune compatibility. And true, Yang and Church come at this research as CRISPR pioneers, but not experts in transplantation. At a gathering of organ-transplantation researchers last Friday, Church said that his team had identified about 45 genes to make pig organs more compatible with humans, though he was open to more suggestions. I would bet we are not as sophisticated as we should be because weve only been recently invited [to meetings like this], he said. Its an active area of research for eGenesis, though Yang declined to disclose what the company has accomplished so far.

Its great genetic-engineering work. Its an accomplishment to inactivate that many genes, says Joseph Tector, a xenotransplant researcher at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Researchers like Tector, who is also a transplant surgeon, have been chipping away at the problem of immune incompatibility for years, though. CRISPR has sped up that research, too. The first pig gene implicated in the human immune response is alpha-gal. Making a pig that lacked alpha-gal via older genetic-engineering methods took three years. Now from concept to pig on the ground, its probably six months, says Tector.

Using CRISPR, his team has created a triple-knockout pig that lacks alpha-gal as well as two other genes involved in molecules that that provoke the human immune systems immediate hyperacute rejection of pig organs. For about 30 percent of people, the organs from these triple-knockout pigs should not cause hyperacute rejection. Tector thinks the patients who receive these pig organs could then be treated with the same immunosuppressant drugs that recipients take after an ordinary human-to-human transplant.

Tector and David Cooper, another transplant pioneer, were both recently recruited to the University of Alabama at Birmingham for a xenotransplant program funded by United Therapeutics, a Maryland biotech company that wants to manufacture transplantable organs.

Cooper has transplanted kidneys from pigs engineered by United Therapeutics to have six mutations, which lasted over 200 days in baboons. The result is promising enough that he says human trials could begin soon. These pigs were not created using CRISPR and they are not PERV-free, though recent research has suggested that PERV may not be that harmful to humans. It will be up to the FDA to decide whether pig organs with PERV are safe enough to transplant into people.

If it happens, routine pig-to-human transplants could truly transform healthcare beyond simply increasing the supply. Organs would go from a product of chancesomeone young and healthy dying, unexpectedlyto the product of a standardized manufacturing process. Its going to make such a huge difference that I dont think its possible to conceive of it, says Cooper. Organ transplants would no longer have to be emergency surgeries, requiring planes to deliver organs and surgical teams to scramble at any hour. Organs from pigs can be harvested on a schedule, and surgeries planned for exact times during the day. A patient that comes in with kidney failure could get a kidney the next dayeliminating the need for large dialysis centers. Hospital ICU beds will no longer be taken up by patients waiting for a heart transplant.

With the ability to engineer a donor pig, pig organs can go beyond simply matching a human organ. For example, Cooper says, you could engineer organs to protect themselves from the immune system in the long term, perhaps by making their own localized dose of immunosuppressant drugs.

'Big Pork' Wants to Get In on Organ Transplants

At last Fridays summit, Church speculated about making organs resistant to tumors or viruses. When an audience member asked about the possibility of genetically enhancing pig organs to work as well as Michael Phelpss lungs or Usain Bolts heart, he responded, We not only can but should enhance pig organs, even if were opposed to enhancing human beings ... They will go through safety and efficacy testing, but part of efficacy is making sure theyre robust and maybe they have to be as robust as Michael Phelps in order to do the job.

Xenotransplantation will raise ethical questions, of course, and genetically enhancing pigs might come uncomfortably close to the plot of Okja. These enhancements are hard to fathom for now because scientist dont yet know what genes to alter if they wanted to make, for example, super lungs. Its taken decades of research to pinpoint the handful of genes that could make pig organs simply compatible with humans. But the technical ability to make any editsor even dozens of edits at oncewith CRISPR is already here.

More:
Genetically Engineering Pigs to Grow Organs for People - The Atlantic

Read More...

It’s Time to Stop Asking Whether Human Genetic Engineering Should Happen and Start Planning to Manage it Safely – HuffPost

August 10th, 2017 2:45 pm

The DNA of early human embryos carrying a sequence leading to hypertrophic cardiomyopathya potentially deadly heart defecthas been edited to ensure they would carry a healthy DNA sequence if brought to term. The Nature paper announcing this has reenergized a terrific national and international debate over whether permanent changes in DNA that can be passed from one generation to another should be made. Bioethicists are asking, Should we genetically engineer children? while some potential parents are almost certainly asking, When will this technique be available?

The Should questions bioethicists are asking are probably not relevant. The only question whose answer ultimately matters is: Can techniques like CRISP-R be used to genetically engineer children safely? Because a variety of forces guarantee that if they can be, they will be.

The key questions reliable practitioners must answer are: Can we prove it works? Then: Can it be used safely?. If yes on these questions, then we will see: Who is marketing this technique to potential parents? Finally, we will learn: Where was it done, who did it, and who paid for its use?

We are closer than ever before to using CRISP-R to replace dangerous DNA sequences with those that wont keep a baby from being healthy. Fortunately, this Nature paper leaves many questions Unanswered because the embryos were not allowed to come to term.

Most importantly, we still dont know Could the embryos have developed into viable babies? Just as in 2015 when researchers at Sun Yat-Sen University in China didnt implant engineered embryos into a womans womb, the scientists who published in Nature recently didnt feel ready (and didnt have permission) to try this potentially enormous step. As experiments proceed, this question will, at some point, be answered.

It will be answered because there is an enormous, proven market for techniques that can be used to ensure that a baby will be born without DNA sequences that can lead to genetically-mediated conditions; many of which are devastating as we have been tragically reminded of late.

Under the best circumstances, in-vitro fertilization leads to a live birth less than half of the time. As a result, whoever tries to see if an embryo that has had targeted DNA repaired using CRISP-R will doubtless prepare a lot of embryos for implanting in quite a few women. When those women are asked to carry these embryos to term we will not know about it. We will probably not find out if none of the embryos come to term successfully.

We *will* know about this procedure if even one baby comes to term and is born with the targeted genetic sequence corrected as intended. Until now, (and maybe even with our new knowledge), any baby brought to term after CRISP-R was used to edit and replace unhealthy DNA would have almost certainly had other DNA damaged in the editing process. This near-certainty and other concerns have held people back from trying to genetically engineer an embryo that they would then bring to term. They could not, until recently, have confidence that only the sequence being targeted has been affected. With this new Nature report, this, at least, is changing.

The results of these newly reported experiments are many steps closer to usability than the Chinese experiments reported in 2015. This is the nature of scientific experimentation, particularly when there is demand for the capability or knowledge being developed.

People try something. It either works or it doesnt. Sometimes when it doesnt work, we learn enough to adjust and try again. If it does work, it often doesnt function exactly the way we expected. Either way, people keep trying until either the technique is perfected or it ultimately proves to be unusable.

This Nature paper is an example of trying something and doing a better job than the first attempt. It does not represent a provably safe and reliable technique . Yet. If market driven research works as it often does, people will work hard to publish data (hopefully from reliable experimental work) suggesting they have a safe and effective technique. Doing so will let them tell some desperate set of wealthy prospective parents: We should be able to use this technique with an acceptable chance of giving you a healthy baby.

Princetons Lee Silver predicted parents desire for gene editing in his Remaking Eden, a book published in 1997. He argued this because people fear sickness or disability and feel strong personal, economic and social pressures to have healthy, beautiful children who should become healthy attractive adults.

People already spend a great deal on molecular techniques like pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). PGD is regularly used to reduce couples risk of having babies with known (or potential), chromosomal abnormalities and/or single gene mutations that can lead to thousands of DNA-mediated conditions.

As I showed in my Genetics dissertation published from Yale in 2004, different countries respond differently to controversial science like this. Similarly, different individuals responses are equally diverse. One poll indicates nearly half of Americans would use gene editing technology to prevent possible DNA-mediated conditions in their children. Policy makers who object to the technology therefore have a problem: if they succeed in blocking it somewhere, research and real world experience indicate other governments may well permit its use. If this happens, these techniques will be available to anyone wealthy and desperate enough to find providers with the marketingand hopefully scientificskill needed to sell people on trying them.

This gene editing controversy is a reminder that we are losing the capacity to effectively ask, Should we? As our knowledge of science grows, becomes more globalized, and is increasingly easy to acquire for people with different morals, needs and wants, we must soon be ready to ask, Can we? and ultimately, Will someone? Their answers will give us the best chance to ensure any babies that may come from any technique described as genetic engineering are born healthy, happy, and able to thrive.

The Morning Email

Wake up to the day's most important news.

See the original post:
It's Time to Stop Asking Whether Human Genetic Engineering Should Happen and Start Planning to Manage it Safely - HuffPost

Read More...

Stem Cell Implant Is Being Trialled To Cure" Type 1 Diabetes – IFLScience

August 10th, 2017 2:45 pm

A groundbreaking attempt to"cure" Type 1 diabetes with stem cells began last week. Embryonic stem cell implants were given to two people, one in the US and one in Canada, with high-risk Type 1 diabetes. The researchers hope that this willhelp the patients manage the condition.

The stem cells, developed by private company ViaCyte, are implanted underneath the patient's forearm, where they take about three months to mature into islet cells. In the pancreas, these cells are responsible for the production of insulin. In people with Type 1 diabetes, these cells are attacked by the bodys own immune system.

If it works, we would call it a functional cure, Paul Laikind of Viacyte told New Scientist. Its not truly a cure because we wouldnt address the autoimmune cause of the disease, but we would be replacing the missing cells.

A smaller implant has already been trialled on 19 people for safety and the company expects to extend the trial to 40 more people later this year, in order to understand both the safety and efficacy of the full-size implant. ViaCyte would like to get preliminary results during the first half of 2018 and to know if the system works between six and12 months later.

Islet transplants have been used to successfully treat patients with unstable, high-risk Type 1 diabetes, but the procedure has limitations, including a very limited supply of donor organs and challenges in obtaining reliable and consistent islet preparations, trial investigator James Shapiro, from the University of Alberta, said in a statement. An effective stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy would solve these issues and has the potential to help a greater number of people.

If a success, the implant will improve the lives of the patients as they wont have to closely monitor their blood levels or inject insulin, but there is a trade-off. They will have to take immunosuppressive drugs, so that their bodies dont attack the newly implanted cells. This iswhy the procedure is targeted atpeople who are at ahigher risk.

Researchers estimate that 140,000 people in Canada and the US are currently suffering from high-risk Type 1 diabetes. The condition can lead to severe episodes of hypoglycemia in the short term and heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease (among others) in thelong term.

[H/T:New Scientist]

See the original post here:
Stem Cell Implant Is Being Trialled To Cure" Type 1 Diabetes - IFLScience

Read More...

‘Origami organs’ could be the future of regenerative medicine – New York Post

August 10th, 2017 2:44 pm

Scientists are making use of discarded animal organs by turning them into origami but its more than just an art project.

A team of researchers at Northwestern University created the paper cranes to demonstrate the flexibility and malleability of their latest breakthrough: a tissue paper that has the potential to heal wounds, prevent scarring and help hormone production in cancer patients.

This new class of biomaterials has potential for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine as well as drug discovery and therapeutics, Ramille Shah, one of the team members, told Northwestern.edu. Its versatile and surgically friendly.

The tissue paper is a blend of proteins from animal organs that, when wet, can be folded, rolled, cut, flattened, balled, ripped and even crafted into tiny birds. It can also be frozen for later use, making it even more practical.

In one of the first lab tests, the team successfully grew hormone-secreting follicles in a culture using a paper made from a cow ovary. Their findings were recently published in Advanced Functional Materials.

And as with many scientific discoveries, the team at Northwestern stumbled upon the new material as an accident.

The scientists were researching 3D-printed mice ovaries when one of the team members spilled the hydrogel-based gelatin ink used in creating the ovaries. The ink pooled into a dry sheet that ended up being surprisingly strong.

The light bulb went on in my head, Adam Jakus, another one of the team members, told Northwestern.edu. I knew right then I could make large amounts of bioactive materials from other organs.

Since then, the researchers have been collecting scrap pig and cow organs from a local butcher and using them to further test out the regenerative tissue paper.

Breaking down everything from animal uteruses to kidneys to muscles to hearts, the team extracts the structural proteins which give an organ its form then dries them out and combines it was a polymer, or resin, which generates the thin, paper structure.

The final product is basically a papier-mch-like sheet of proteins that can retain the biochemicals needed to regenerate a sick or injured piece of tissue, like a human liver, or skin laceration.

Though a lot more research is needed, the material could one day be used to accelerate healing after surgery and help treat hormone deficiencies in cancer patients. The researchers also found it can support human stem cell growth.

It is really amazing that meat and animal by-products like a kidney, liver, heart and uterus can be transformed into paper-like biomaterials that can potentially regenerate and restore function to tissues and organs, Jakus said. Ill never look at a steak or pork tenderloin the same way again.

Read more:
'Origami organs' could be the future of regenerative medicine - New York Post

Read More...

Okyanos Center for Regenerative Medicine to Hold Stem Cell Symposium in Freeport – Benzinga

August 10th, 2017 2:44 pm

First Annual Meeting Will Host Healthcare Administrators and Practitioners to Highlight Stem Cell Research Advances and Applications Through Expert Panel Discussions

Freeport, Grand Bahama (PRWEB) August 09, 2017

Okyanos Center for Regenerative Medicine has announced its First Annual Regenerative Medicine Symposium will take place at the Pelican Bay Hotel in Freeport, Grand Bahama on September 27, 2017. This daytime event is free to attend, however space is limited and pre-registration is required.

With oversight from the Ministry of Health's National Stem Cell Ethics Committee (NSCEC) and regulations laid out in the Stem Cell Research and Therapy Act passed in 2013, The Bahamas remains a leader in the global regenerative medicine community. Okyanos Center for Regenerative Medicine was the first cell therapy facility to meet the required standards and began treating patients in 2014.

Healthcare practitioners and administrators are encouraged to participate in the upcoming symposium which will feature specialist presentations, expert panel discussions and live Q&A sessions. The symposium will conclude in time for guests to attend the Okyanos-sponsored Grand Bahama Medical and Dental Association (GBMDA) welcome cocktail reception which will take place at 6:00pm on September 27th at the Pelican Bay.

"It is great to have this year's Grand Bahama Medical and Dental Association conference coordinated with the regenerative medicine symposium," said Dr. Vincent Burton who serves as Okyanos President and Chief Anesthesiologist as well as Vice President of the GBMDA. "The partnership we have forged should ensure an abundance of learning and networking opportunities for attendees."

Director of Research and Development Marc Penn, MD, PhD, FACC, will moderate the informative sessions and address the symposium to share an overview of Okyanos' planned research foci and strategic direction. "Through this annual meeting and others like it, we hope to encourage ongoing discussions which are critical to the development of the regenerative medicine industry both locally and internationally," said Dr. Penn.

To learn more and to register for Okyanos' First Annual Regenerative Medicine Symposium, please visit the Okyanos website.

ABOUT OKYANOS CENTER FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE (OH KEY AH NOS): Combining state-of-the art technologies delivered in a cell therapy center of excellence, Okyanos Center for Regenerative Medicine is a leading adult stem cell therapy provider located in Freeport, Grand Bahama. Okyanos was founded in 2011 and is licensed and accredited by the Bahamas' National Stem Cell Ethics Committee (NSCEC) under the Bahamas Stem Cell Therapy and Research Act to provide cell therapy to patients with chronic medical needs that, per scientific research, clinical trials and application, can be safely and potentially efficaciously treated with patients' own adipose-derived stem and regenerative cells. The literary name Okyanos, the Greek god of the river Okeanos, symbolizes restoration of blood flow. Learn more at http://www.okyanos.com.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2017/08/prweb14585069.htm

See the rest here:
Okyanos Center for Regenerative Medicine to Hold Stem Cell Symposium in Freeport - Benzinga

Read More...

Microchip May Fix Damaged Cells And Organs, Scientists Say … – CBS New York

August 10th, 2017 2:44 pm

COLUMBUS, Ohio (CBSNewYork) It sounds like something out of a sci-fi novel a microchip that rescues injured or failing organs.

As CBS2s Dr. Max Gomez reported Tuesday, the breakthrough in regenerative medicine is actually being tested right now.

One of the hottest areas of medical research is using cells instead of drugs to treat diseases and injuries. But cellular therapies require finding or making the right type of cells, which can be difficult.

It turns out the body can do it on its own, with a little high-tech help.

The device is only about the size of a cufflink, but what it could represent is enormous. In a laboratory at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, researchers demonstrated how it reprograms cells.

The chip is simply placed on an injured part of the body and a small electrical current is applied.

This process only takes less than a second and is non-invasive and then youre off, said Dr. Chan of Ohio State Wexner Medical Center. The chip does not stay with you, and the reprogramming of the cell starts.

That reprogramming turns skin cells into nearly any type of cell doctors might need to treat a patient a breakthrough technology in regenerative medicine.

For example, in a leg that is badly injured and lacks blood flow, doctors simply touch the chip to the leg and reprogram the skin to become functioning blood vessels.

And it will quickly shoot the DNA right into the cells, said Dr. James Lee of the Ohio State College of Engineering.

In many cases in seven days, you start seeing changes and these changes to our pleasant surprise persists, Dr. Sen said.

Within a week, there are active blood vessels and by the second week, the leg is saved.

It is important to note that the procedure has not yet been tested in humans. But after developing the concept, researchers were determined to test it in real life.

So we tried them on the mouse and put it on the skin, and you know what? It actually works, said Dr. James Lee of the Ohio State College of Engineering. It affects the entire tissue, not just the surface.

An image shows the mouses leg is injured, and vascular scans show there is little blood flow. But after one touch with the chip, in just three weeks, the blood flow was back and the injured leg was saved.

Our technology is not just limited to be used on the skin, Dr. Sen said. It can be used in other tissues within the body or outside the body, so on and so forth. So, skin is only one example.

In fact, in lab tests the chip even worked in the brain helping mice recover from strokes. In humans, it could allow doctors to grow brain cells on a persons skin under the guidance of their own immune system.

They could then harvest the cells and inject them into the brain to treat conditions such as Alzheimers disease and Parkinsons disease without any immune suppression drugs being necessary.

The electrical current actually opens up channels in the skin cells that allow the delivery of factors that are known to change the expression of certain genes in those cells. Better yet, the reprogramming doesnt have to be in a hospital setting because there is nothing invasive about it.

Read the rest here:
Microchip May Fix Damaged Cells And Organs, Scientists Say ... - CBS New York

Read More...

96-year-old Cudahy woman shares her secret to longevity – WTMJ-TV (press release) (registration) (blog)

August 10th, 2017 2:43 pm

She's 96 years young and she still drives, and she's still working.

Helen Kenney is a source of inspiration for people of all ages. Helen loves working at Joe's K-Ranch in Cudahy.

We surprised Helen with a visit and all three of her adult children showed up.

Helen's youngest daughter Pat Mueller told us about her mom. She called Helen "Milwaukee's Betty White."

The adoring grandmother and great-grandmother enjoys working. K-Ranch owner Jerry Kotarak refuses to let her retire.

"I won't let her go, he said.

K-Ranch has been a dining hot spot since 1958. It's famous for its homey atmosphere and good food. Patrons come back year after year. Many say it's great food, good prices and friendly faces like Helen's. Helen usually works the kitchen but helps out where needed.

Even Chef Larry Burss admits she keeps him in line.

"She says, Larry if I can't work for you I don't know what I'll do. I'll probably die. So it's a blessing," he said.Helen has worked in food service most of her life. She retired from Ladish after 34 years. When her husband died in 1995 she returned to work three weeks later at the age of 75.

"When he was alive we used to travel and do things. That all ended. I thought I'd just keep working," she said.As for diet? Helen eats what she wants, and stopped drinking alcohol in her 80s. Her advice to the golden crowd?"You have to keep moving and keep all your muscles going." she said.And though Helen, perhaps we can see the secret of longevity. Stay active, work hard, and make cherished memories with family and friends. Helen turns 97 Aug. 15.

See more here:
96-year-old Cudahy woman shares her secret to longevity - WTMJ-TV (press release) (registration) (blog)

Read More...

One Key To Extending Your Longevity? Avoid Crude Oil Future Trades – Benzinga

August 10th, 2017 2:43 pm

JC Parets, the author of AllStarCharts, stopped by PreMarket Prep Thursday to discuss, among other things, S&P futures and crude oil futures. Here are the highlights.

"We broke out of that 2450 level in July, and that was a big deal. That 2450 in the S&P 500 is a big one. If we start to fall below that, then we are no longer making higher highs and higher lows. But we haven't broken anything of that yet."

"It's a hot mess," Parets said. "That lack of trend is trend recognition in and of itself. Here we are looking at crude oil right at a flat 200-day moving average. If you guys want headaches, buy and short stocks that are trading near flat 200-day moving averages.

"This one lesson is one I had to learn the hard way because I kept having to get beat over the head with it until I finally realized stop trading damn stocks near flat 200-day moving averages. And it goes the same way for futures. Literally the crude oil is at a flat 200-day.

"I do think we can potentially get back up into the $70$80s in oil, there's no question. The problem is where do we enter? Let's say hypothetically we buy it today. Where are we wrong? Where's the out? Are we wrong before $40? I don't have a pivot point to trade off of where I can say "If it falls below this, all bets are off." Crude oil's not giving us that right now and the fact that there's no trend is evidence that we shouldn't be looking at this in the first place."

He added, "If I never trade another crude oil future for the rest of my life I will most likely live a longer life. So, I'm cool with not being in this market."

Catch the full interview with Parets at 32:50 in the clip below.

PreMarket Prep is a daily trading show that airs every morning from 89 a.m. ET here and on our YouTube Channel. You can also listen to the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and Stitcher.

Posted-In: Long Ideas Short Ideas Futures Technicals Commodities Top Stories Markets Media Best of Benzinga

2017 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

See the article here:
One Key To Extending Your Longevity? Avoid Crude Oil Future Trades - Benzinga

Read More...

Breaking age groups into categories is challenging in era of longevity – Wilkes Barre Times-Leader

August 10th, 2017 2:43 pm

As someone who writes a lot about the medical and social issues of aging, I am constantly faced with a problem: What am I supposed to call old people these days?

I know. Some of you are mad at me already, but it gets really tiresome to have to alternate among the hazy euphemisms that are supposed to stand in for the hated word old. Older, as in older adults or older people, seems to be the most acceptable term, but it offends the part of me that prefers words with some precision. Older than what? Everybodys older than somebody. Senior citizen has fallen out of fashion, but seniors is OK in some quarters. (Definitely not all.) Some writers use mature. Do we really have to wait till were 65 to be mature? I rather like elders, but when does that start?

I am old enough to remember when it was OK to call people not much older than I am now (62) old. I get that ageism is a serious problem, especially if you feel good and want to or have to keep working after 65 in a setting that prizes youth. In some quarters, 30 is over the hill. So, I see why advocates dislike the word old and all its pejorative implications. We live in an era when both our recent presidential candidates were past traditional retirement age, when rock stars tour in their 70s, when Tony Bennett is beloved and charismatic at 90, when doctors, lawyers and professors routinely work well into what used to be old age. We need to rethink what old means.

But I personally think that some of my baby boomer peers the oldest are now 71 are ridiculously sensitive about words that imply theyve lived a while. I also think its crazy to use the same word to describe me that youd use for my frail, almost 88-year-old mother. I asked her how she thinks people should describe her and she said ancient. She wasnt joking. I am clearly beyond middle-aged, from a math perspective, unless I got every possible good gene in my family. It would make my life as a writer who sometimes has to write about age groups easier if we had more than one word for the huge swath of the population over that arbitrary line: age 65.

I asked some experts for help with my terminology problem and found that theyve been struggling with it too. For years.

We need a word or words to describe this period, and we just dont have them yet, said Tracey Gendron, a gerontologist at Virginia Commonwealth University. She prefers not to categorize people, but says referring to older adults and the aging population is acceptable.

As she and others pointed out, one source of the problem is that were dealing with something new. I think were in an unprecedented time, this longevity revolution, she said.

Aging experts, she said, have tried calling people young old (65 to 74), old old (75-84) and oldest old (85+). Age-based categories at this stage of life often arent helpful, she said, because there is so much variability in how people age.

The variation in aging is vast, said Christine Arenson, a geriatrician at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Most geriatricians think of their target patient group as starting around 70, she said, but a 40-year-old who has had diabetes for 20 years might have much in common with older patients. Most 65-year-olds in America are quite healthy still, she said.

John Shoven, a Stanford University economics professor, said you could define the end of middle age as the point at which people have a one percent chance of dying in the next year. The age at which men and women have reached that milestone has climbed impressively since 1930.

Shoven looked at three groups: those who had a 1 percent, 2 percent and 4 percent chance of dying in the next year. Shoven thinks achieving 1 percent risk roughly corresponds with the end of what most of us think of as middle age. Shoven himself hes 70 likes to think of middle age as the middle of our adult years, not the middle of our whole life. He thinks if your chances of dying are less than 1 in 100, youre still young. He doesnt think were old until our risk climbs to 4 percent. The striking thing is that the age at which people reached those milestones has climbed impressively. In 1930, an average man reached the 1 percent threshold at 44. Men now hit that mark around 60, women at 65. The age at which men have a 4 percent risk of dying in a year rose from 65 in 1930 to 76. Women now get there around 80.

That jibes with Jerry Johnsons experience. He is chief of geriatric medicine at Penn Medicine and is himself 69. He says that many 70-year-olds have more in common medically with 50-year-olds than with 80-year-olds. Between 70 and 80, a lot happens in terms of endurance and energy conservation and exposure to new diseases and co-morbidities, he said. Between 80 and 85, many people begin to think and act differently.

He hasnt found a word that pleases everybody. Some patients dont want any word for the older age group. He thinks a label helps with succinct communication but added that labeling is always flawed. Theres no way to get around it.

There seems to be general agreement among experts that elderly and senior citizen and aged are on the outs. Elders has fans because it connotes respect, but, apparently, some critics think its too much like elderly.

Kirsten Jacobs, associate director, dementia and wellness, for LeadingAge, a senior housing group, said people should also steer clear of silver tsunami, a term often used to describe the coming increase in need for senior services as boomers age. Equating aging to a natural disaster, she said, sends the wrong message.

The FrameWorks Institute, which helps advocates and scientists communicate more effectively about their social issues, recently studied attitudes and messages around aging and concluded this year that aging has a major image problem. People almost always see it as negative. The way we talk about aging is littered with othering language that sees older people as them and not us. As Allen Glicksman, 63, director of research and evaluation for Philadelphia Corporation for Aging, joked, Old is 10 years older than you are.

Pope Francis, center, is greeted by South Korean children upon his arrival at Seoul Air Base in 2014. The pope is 80 years old an age that doesnt seem as old as it once did.

Singer Tony Bennett, right, who turned 91 on Aug. 3, has recorded music with Lady Gaga in recent years.

Actress Olivia de Havilland, a star of such films as the classic Gone With the Wind, turned 101 in July.

Stacey Burling

Old hard to categorize in age of longevity

Read the original:
Breaking age groups into categories is challenging in era of longevity - Wilkes Barre Times-Leader

Read More...

Genetics takes fight to gardeners’ green foe – Phys.Org

August 10th, 2017 2:42 pm

A scientist from The University of Manchester has hit upon an innovative way to control greenflies which infest our gardens and farms.

Dr Mouhammad Shadi Khudr, discovered that living lacewing insects- which are used as a way to biocontrol greenflies are also effective after they have died.

Dr Khudr, an evolutionary ecologist based at the University's Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, discovered how genetic variations in greenflies' respond to the fear of predation by lacewing known as aphid lions.

The greenflys' genetic variation and life history influenced how they responded to traces of their predator.

He hit upon the discovery while looking at how different lineages of one species of greenfly responded to lacewings on a crop.

Even though each greenfly line had a distinct way of responding to the exposure to the traces of the aphid lion they all suffered from dramatic reduction in their reproduction, he says.

Dr khudr designed and lead the collaborative research, which was funded by the Freie Universitt Berlin (Free University of Berlin).

The research is published in the journal Scientific Reports today.

He said: "Whether alive or dead, lacewings make it more difficult for aphids to reproduce.

"The smell and visual impact of dead predators reduce the greenflies' capacity to give offspring and the way they clump together on the plants they infest."

He added: "This approach is at the crossroads of agricultural, evolutionary and ecological science.

"It is a unique way of understanding the effect of genetic variability corresponding with the risk of predation and thus should receive much more attention.

"It has organic, easy to produce and affordable applications and thus has a promising potential to help solve an age old problem which frustrates many gardeners.

"And it would be most interesting to see if this approach might also work with other pests and biocontrol agents in other agricultural systems."

Explore further: The genetics of life and death in an evolutionary arms-race

More information: Mouhammad Shadi Khudr et al. Fear of predation alters clone-specific performance in phloem-feeding prey, Scientific Reports (2017). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07723-6

More:
Genetics takes fight to gardeners' green foe - Phys.Org

Read More...

Cancer’s Newest Miracle Cure – TIME

August 10th, 2017 2:42 pm

With the usual mix of anticipation and apprehension, Kaitlyn Johnson is getting ready to go to her first summer camp. She's looking forward to meeting new friends and being able to ride horses, swim and host tea parties. She's also a little nervous and a little scared, like any 7-year-old facing her first sleepaway camp.

But the wonder is that Kaitlyn is leaving the house for anything but a medical facility. Diagnosed with leukemia when she was 18 months old, her life has been consumed with cancer treatments, doctors' visits and hospital stays.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common cancer among young children, accounting for a quarter of all cancer cases in kids, and it has no cure. For about 85% to 90% of children, the leukemia can, however, be effectively treated through chemotherapy.

If it is not eliminated and comes back, it is, more often than not, fatal. Rounds of chemotherapy can buy patients time, but as the disease progresses, the periods of remission get shorter and shorter. "The options for these patients are not very good at all," says Dr. Theodore Laetsch, a pediatrician at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

When Kaitlyn's cancer wasn't controlled after three years and round after round of chemotherapy drugs, her doctors had little else to offer. "They said, 'This did nothing, it didn't touch it,'" says Kaitlyn's mother Mandy, a dental assistant from Royce City, Texas. "My stomach just dropped." Kaitlyn could receive a bone-marrow transplant, but only about half of those procedures are successful, and there was a good chance that she would reject the donor cells. If that happened, her chances of surviving were very small.

In a calculated gamble, her doctors suggested a radical new option: becoming a test subject in a trial of an experimental therapy that would, for the first time, use gene therapy to train a patient's immune system to recognize and destroy their cancer in the same way it dispatches bacteria and viruses. The strategy is the latest development in immunotherapy, a revolutionary approach to cancer treatment that uses a series of precision strikes to disintegrate cancer from within the body itself. Joining the trial was risky, since other attempts to activate the immune system hadn't really worked in the past. Mandy, her husband James and Kaitlyn traveled from their home in Texas to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), where they stayed in a hotel for eight weeks while Kaitlyn received the therapy and recovered. "The thought crossed my mind that Kaitlyn might not come home again," says Mandy. "I couldn't tell you how many times I would be in the bathroom at the hospital, spending an hour in the shower just crying, thinking, What are we going to do if this doesn't help her?"

But it did. After receiving the therapy in 2015, the cancer cells in Kaitlyn's body melted away. Test after test, including one that picks up one cancer cell in a million, still can't detect any malignant cells lurking in Kaitlyn's blood. What saved Kaitlyn was an infusion of her own immune cells that were genetically modified to destroy her leukemia. "You take someone who essentially has no possibility for a cure--almost every single one of these patients dies--and with [this] therapy, 90% go into remission," says Dr. David Porter, director of blood and bone-marrow transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania. Such radical immune-based approaches were launched in 2011 with the success of intravenous drugs that loosen the brakes on the immune system so it can see cancer cells and destroy them with the same vigor with which they attack bacteria and viruses. Now, with the genetically engineered immune cells known as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells that were used in Kaitlyn's study, doctors are crippling cancer in more precise and targeted ways than surgery, chemotherapy and radiation ever could. While the first cancer immunotherapies were broadly aimed at any cancer, experts are now repurposing the immune system into a personalized precision treatment that can not only recognize but also eliminate the cancer cells unique to each individual patient.

What makes immune-based therapies like CAR T cell therapy so promising--and so powerful--is that they are a living drug churned out by the patients themselves. The treatment isn't a pill or a liquid that has to be taken regularly, but a one-hit wonder that, when given a single time, trains the body to keep on treating, ideally for a lifetime.

"This therapy is utterly transformative for this kind of leukemia and also lymphoma," says Stephan Grupp, director of the cancer immunotherapy program at CHOP and one of the lead doctors treating patients in the study in which Kaitlyn participated.

Eager to bring this groundbreaking option to more patients, including those with other types of cancers, an advisory panel for the Food and Drug Administration voted unanimously in July to move the therapy beyond the testing phase, during which several hundred people have been able to take advantage of it, to become a standard therapy for children with certain leukemias if all other treatments have failed. While the FDA isn't obligated to follow the panel's advice, it often does, and it is expected to announce its decision in a matter of weeks.

Across the country, doctors are racing to enroll people with other cancers--breast, prostate, pancreatic, ovarian, sarcoma and brain, including the kind diagnosed in Senator John McCain--in hundreds of trials to see if they, too, will benefit from this novel approach. They are even cautiously allowing themselves to entertain the idea that this living drug may even lead to a cure for some of these patients. Curing cancers, rather than treating them, would result in a significant drop in the more than $120 billion currently spent each year on cancer care in the U.S., as well as untold suffering.

This revolutionary therapy, however, almost didn't happen. While the idea of using the body's immune cells against cancer has been around for a long time, the practical reality had proved daunting. Unlike infection-causing bacteria and viruses that are distinctly foreign to the body, cancer cells start out as healthy cells that mutate and grow out of control, and the immune system is loath to target its own cells.

"Only a handful of people were doing the research," says Dr. Carl June, director of the Center for Cellular Immunotherapy at the University of Pennsylvania's Abramson Cancer Center and the scientist who pioneered the therapy. A graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, June is all too familiar with the devastating effects of cancer, having lost his first wife to ovarian cancer and battled skin cancer himself. Trial after trial failed as reinfusions of immune cells turned out to be more of a hit-or-miss endeavor than a reliable road to remission.

After spending nearly three decades on the problem, June zeroed in on a malignant fingerprint that could be exploited to stack the deck of a cancer patient's immune system with the right destructive cells to destroy the cancer.

In the case of leukemias, that marker turned out to be CD19, a protein that all cancerous blood cells sprout on their surface. June repurposed immune cells to carry a protein that would stick to CD19, along with another marker that would activate the immune cells to start attacking the cancer more aggressively once they found their malignant marks. Using a design initially developed by researchers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital for such a combination, June and his colleague Bruce Levine perfected a way to genetically modify and grow these cancer-fighting cells in abundance in the lab and to test them in animals with leukemia. The resulting immune platoon of CAR T cells is uniquely equipped to ferret out and destroy cancer cells. But getting them into patients is a complex process. Doctors first remove a patient's immune cells from the blood, genetically tweak them in the lab to carry June's cancer-targeting combination and then infuse the modified cells back into the patient using an IV.

Because these repurposed immune cells continue to survive and divide, the therapy continues to work for months, years and, doctors hope, perhaps a lifetime. Similar to the way vaccines prompt the body to produce immune cells that can provide lifelong protection against viruses and bacteria, CAR T cell therapy could be a way to immunize against cancer. "The word vaccination would not be inappropriate," says Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society.

June's therapy worked surprisingly well in mice, shrinking tumors and, in some cases, eliminating them altogether. He applied for a grant at the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health to study the therapy in people from 2010 to 2011. But the idea was still so new that many scientists believed that testing it in people was too risky. In 1999, a teenager died days after receiving an experimental dose of genes to correct an inherited disorder, and anything involving gene therapy was viewed suspiciously. While such deaths aren't entirely unusual in experimental studies, there were ethical questions about whether the teenager and his family were adequately informed of the risks and concerns that the doctor in charge of the study had a financial conflict of interest in seeing the therapy develop. Officials in charge of the program acknowledged that important questions were raised by the trial and said they took the questions and concerns very seriously. But the entire gene-therapy program was shut down. All of that occurred at the University of Pennsylvania--where June was. His grant application was rejected.

It would take two more years before private funders--the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and an alumnus of the university who was eager to support new cancer treatments--donated $5 million to give June the chance to bring his therapy to the first human patients.

The date July 31 has always been a milestone for Bill Ludwig, a retired corrections officer in New Jersey. It's the day that he joined the Marines as an 18-year-old, and the day, 30 years later, that he married his wife Darla.

It was also the day he went to the hospital to become the first person ever to receive the combination gene and CAR T cell therapy, in 2010. For Ludwig, the experimental therapy was his only remaining option. Like many people with leukemia, Ludwig had been living on borrowed time for a decade, counting the days between the chemotherapy treatments that would hold the cancer in his blood cells at bay for a time. Inevitably, like weeds in an untended garden, the leukemia cells would grow and take over his blood system again.

But the periods of reprieve were getting dangerously short. "I was running out of treatments," says Ludwig. So when his doctor mentioned the trial conducted by June and Porter at the University of Pennsylvania, he didn't hesitate. "I never thought that the clinical trial was going to cure me," he says. "I just wanted to live and to continue to fight. If there was something that would put me into the next month, still breathing, then that's what I was looking for."

When Ludwig signed the consent form for the treatment, he wasn't even told what to expect in terms of side effects or adverse reactions. The scientists had no way of predicting what would happen. "They explained that I was the first and that they obviously had no case law, so to speak," he says. So when he was hit with a severe fever, had difficulty breathing, showed signs of kidney failure and was admitted to the intensive care unit, he assumed that the treatment wasn't working.

His condition deteriorated so quickly and so intensely that doctors told him to call his family to his bedside, just four days after he received the modified cells. "I told my family I loved them and that I knew why they were there," he says. "I had already gone and had a cemetery plot, and already paid for my funeral."

Rather than signaling the end, Ludwig's severe illness turned out to be evidence that the immune cells he received were furiously at work, eliminating and sweeping away the huge burden of cancer cells choking up his bloodstream. But his doctors did not realize it at the time.

It wasn't until the second patient, Doug Olson, who received his CAR T cells about six weeks after Ludwig, that Porter had a eureka moment. When he received the call that Olson was also running a high fever, having trouble breathing and showing abnormal lab results, Porter realized that these were signs that the treatment was working. "It happens when you kill huge amounts of cancer cells all at the same time," Porter says. What threw him off initially is that it's rare for anything to wipe out that much cancer in people with Ludwig's and Olson's disease. June and Porter have since calculated that the T cells obliterated anywhere from 2.5 lb. to 7 lb. of cancer in Ludwig's and Olson's bodies. "I couldn't fathom that this is why they both were so sick," says Porter. "But I realized this is the cells: they were working, and working rapidly. It was not something we see with chemotherapy or anything else we have to treat this cancer."

Ludwig has now been in remission for seven years, and his success led to the larger study of CAR T cell therapy in children like Kaitlyn, who no longer respond to existing treatments for their cancer. The only side effect Ludwig has is a weakened immune system; because the treatment wipes out a category of his immune cells--the ones that turned cancerous--he returns to the University of Pennsylvania every seven weeks for an infusion of immunoglobulins to protect him from pneumonia and colds. Olson, too, is still cancer-free.

While the number of people who have received CAR T cell therapy is still small, the majority are in remission. That's especially encouraging for children, whose lives are permanently disrupted by the repeated cycles of treatments that currently are their only option. "It's a chance for these kids to have a normal life and a normal childhood that doesn't involve constant infusions, transfusions, infections and being away from their home, family and school," says Dr. Gwen Nichols, chief medical officer of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

The hope is that while CAR T cell therapy will at first be reserved for people who have failed to respond to all standard treatments, eventually they won't have to wait that long. As doctors learn from pioneers like Kaitlyn, Ludwig and Olson, they will have more confidence in pushing the therapy earlier, when patients are stronger and the cancer is less advanced--perhaps as a replacement for or in combination with other treatments.

The severe immune reaction triggered by the therapy remains a big concern. While it can be monitored in the hospital and managed with steroids or antibodies that fight inflammation, there have been deaths in other trials involving CAR T cells. One drug company put one of its studies on hold due to the toxic side effects. "I am excited by CAR T therapy, but I'm also worried that some people might get too excited," says the American Cancer Society's Brawley. "It's important that we proceed slowly and do this meticulously so that we develop this in the right way."

For now, CAR T cells are expensive--some analysts estimate that each patient's batch of cells would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars--because they require a bespoke production process. If approved, Novartis, which licensed the technology from the University of Pennsylvania, will provide the therapy in about 35 cancer centers in the U.S. by the end of the year. Other companies are already working toward universal T cells that could be created for off-the-shelf use in any patient with cancer. "This is just the beginning," says June.

Since Ludwig's cancer has been in remission, he and his wife have packed their RV and taken the vacations they missed while he was a slave to his cancer and chemotherapy schedule. This year, they're visiting Mount Rushmore, Grand Teton National Park and Yellowstone National Park before taking their granddaughter to Disney World in the fall. "When they told me I was cancer-free, it was just like someone said, 'You won the lottery,'" he says. "If somebody else with this disease has the chance to walk in my shoes and live past it, that would be the greatest gift for me."

Read more:
Cancer's Newest Miracle Cure - TIME

Read More...

Stem-cell treatment may harm heart disease patients – ISRAEL21c

August 10th, 2017 2:42 pm

For patients with severe and end-stage heart failure there are few treatment options left apart from transplants and stem-cell therapy. But a new Israeli study finds that stem-cell therapy may harm heart-disease patients.

The research, led by Prof. Jonathan Leor of Tel Aviv Universitys Sackler Faculty of Medicineand Sheba Medical Center and conducted by TAUs Dr. Nili Naftali-Shani, explores the current practice of using cells from the host patient to repair tissue and contends that this can prove toxic for patients.

We found that, contrary to popular belief, tissue stem cells derived from sick hearts do not contribute to heart healing after injury, said Leor. Furthermore, we found that these cells are affected by the inflammatory environment and develop inflammatory properties. The affected stem cells may even exacerbate damage to the already diseased heart muscle.

Tissue or adult stem cells blank cells that can act as a repair kit for the body by replacing damaged tissue encourage the regeneration of blood vessel cells and new heart muscle tissue. Faced with a worse survival rate than many cancers, many heart-failure patients have turned to stem-cell therapy as a last resort.

But our findings suggest that stem cells, like any drug, can have adverse effects, said Leor. We concluded that stem cells used in cardiac therapy should be drawn from healthy donors or be better genetically engineered for the patient.

The researchers, who published their study in the journal Circulation, also discovered the molecular pathway involved in the negative interaction between stem cells and the immune system as they isolated stem cells in mouse models of heart disease. Afterward, they focused on cardiac stem cells in patients with heart disease.

The results could help improve the use of autologous stem cells those drawn from the patients themselves in cardiac therapy, Leor said.

We showed that the deletion of the gene responsible for this pathway can restore the original therapeutic function of the cells, said Leor. Our findings determine the potential negative effects of inflammation on stem-cell function as theyre currently used. The use of autologous stem cells from patients with heart disease should be modified. Only stem cells from healthy donors or genetically engineered cells should be used in treating cardiac conditions.

The researchers are currently testing a gene editing technique (CRISPER) to inhibit the gene responsible for the negative inflammatory properties of the cardiac stem cells of heart disease patients. We hope our engineered stem cells will be resistant to the negative effects of the immune system, said Leor.

Read the rest here:
Stem-cell treatment may harm heart disease patients - ISRAEL21c

Read More...

What Will Happen to Neuralstem Incorporated (NASDAQ:CUR) Next? The Stock Has Increase in Shorts – BZ Weekly

August 10th, 2017 2:42 pm

August 10, 2017 - By Louis Casey

Investors sentiment decreased to 0.3 in Q4 2016. Its down 0.37, from 0.67 in 2016Q3. It turned negative, as 16 investors sold Neuralstem, Inc. shares while 11 reduced holdings. 2 funds opened positions while 6 raised stakes. 6.88 million shares or 44.05% less from 12.30 million shares in 2016Q3 were reported.Fifth Third Bank & Trust accumulated 120,000 shares. Moreover, Northern has 0% invested in Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR). Geode Capital Mgmt Limited Liability Company, Massachusetts-based fund reported 1.03 million shares. Blair William Il holds 0% or 418,942 shares. National Bank Of Mellon Corp owns 0% invested in Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR) for 91,969 shares. California Public Employees Retirement invested in 155,700 shares. Wells Fargo And Mn stated it has 0% in Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR). Vanguard Group Incorporated Inc invested in 3.09 million shares or 0% of the stock. The California-based Blackrock Institutional Na has invested 0% in Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR). National Asset Mgmt Incorporated invested in 0.01% or 167,500 shares. Natl Bank Of America Corp De, North Carolina-based fund reported 8,400 shares. Blackrock Advisors reported 17,361 shares. First Heartland Consultants accumulated 10,000 shares. Kcg Holding reported 0% in Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR). Gru One Trading L P accumulated 4,349 shares.

Since February 24, 2017, it had 3 buys, and 0 insider sales for $70,004 activity. LLOYD JONES JONATHAN BRIAN had bought 5,455 shares worth $30,003. 7,500 shares were bought by Daly Richard J, worth $30,000.

The stock of Neuralstem Incorporated (NASDAQ:CUR) registered an increase of 0.98% in short interest. CURs total short interest was 942,000 shares in August as published by FINRA. Its up 0.98% from 932,900 shares, reported previously. With 90,000 shares average volume, it will take short sellers 11 days to cover their CURs short positions. The short interest to Neuralstem Incorporateds float is 11.11%.

It closed at $1.08 lastly. It is down 3.35% since August 10, 2016 and is uptrending. It has underperformed by 13.35% the S&P500.

Neuralstem, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The company has market cap of $13.09 million. The Firm is engaged in research, development and commercialization of central nervous system therapies based on its human neuronal stem cells and its stem-cell derived small molecule compounds. It currently has negative earnings. The Firm has approximately three assets: its NSI-189 small molecule program, its NSI-566 stem cell therapy program and its chemical entity screening platform.

More notable recent Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR) news were published by: Globenewswire.com which released: Neuralstem Reports Second Quarter 2017 Fiscal Results and Provides Clinical on August 08, 2017, also Seekingalpha.com with their article: Neuralstem Is Doomed published on August 03, 2017, Globenewswire.com published: Neuralstem Announces Pricing of Public Offering of Common Stock and Warrants on July 27, 2017. More interesting news about Neuralstem, Inc. (NASDAQ:CUR) were released by: Globenewswire.com and their article: Neuralstem Awarded $~1MM Grant by NIH to Continue Preclinical Research into published on August 02, 2017 as well as Benzinga.coms news article titled: Mid-Day Market Update: ShoreTel Gains On Acquisition News; Neuralstem Shares with publication date: July 27, 2017.

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with our FREE daily email newsletter.

View original post here:
What Will Happen to Neuralstem Incorporated (NASDAQ:CUR) Next? The Stock Has Increase in Shorts - BZ Weekly

Read More...

Does the rain affect arthritis pain? Bad weather linked to joint pain could be a MYTH – Express.co.uk

August 9th, 2017 10:43 pm

In fact, people reported more knee and hip pain when the weather was good, suggesting it is activity, not cold or rain that affects sufferers most.

Arthritis, causing achy joints affects ten million Britons and is said to be fuelled by the damp climate.

But people's activity levels, which rise with the temperature, are likelier than the weather to trigger online searches for knee and hip pain, say scientists.

Google hits for arthritis over a period of five years had no discernible link with the elements, said Professor Scott Telfer.

He said: "You hear people with arthritis say they can tell when the weather is changing.

"But with past studies there's only been vague associations, nothing very concrete, and our findings align with those."

In fact searches for knee-and-hip-pain increased in tandem with temperatures - until it got uncomfortably hot.

And rainy days tended to slightly reduce internet traffic for both conditions. This inferred "changes in physical activity levels" were primarily responsible.

Prof Telfer, a researcher in orthopaedics and sports medicine at Washington University in St Louis, said: "We haven't found any direct mechanism that links ambient temperature with pain."

His interest in using internet data stems from the fact web searches are increasingly people's first response to experiencing adverse health symptoms.

He said some people with achy joints and arthritis swear weather influences their pain.

So in the first study of its kind across 45 major US cities he found sunshine, rainfall and temperature are indeed associated with joint pain, but not in the way you'd expect.

Within the study's focus span of 23 to 86 degrees Fahrenheit searches rose steadily. Knee-pain peaked at 73 degrees and were less frequent at higher temperatures.

Hip-pain searches peaked at 83 degrees and then tailed off. Rain actually dampened search volumes for both.

The findings published in PLOS ONE show people's activity level is a bigger risk than the weather to cause pain that spurs online searches.

Prof Telfer said: "We were surprised by how consistent the results were throughout the range of temperatures in cities across the country."

His team used Google Trends for how the number of searchers for arthritis or hip and knee pain fluctuated with the weather. Searches related to stomach pain were also calculated as a control.

Daily summaries of local weather data from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015 included temperature, rainfall, relative humidity and barometric pressure.

These are factors previously suggested as associated with increases in musculoskeletal pain.

Among all the variables only temperature and rainfall were found to have statistically significant associations for knee-and-hip-pain but not arthritis.

Prof Telfer said:

"What we think is a much more likely explanation is the fact people are more active on nice days - so more prone to have overuse and acute injuries from that and to search online for relevant information.

"That's our hypothesis for what we'll explore next."

The stomach-pain searches rose at low and high temperature extremes and ebbed in mild temperatures.

This was a very different pattern from the knee-and-hip-pain searches - backing the findings.

Excerpt from:
Does the rain affect arthritis pain? Bad weather linked to joint pain could be a MYTH - Express.co.uk

Read More...

SLO County woman to bike 525 miles to raise money for Arthritis Foundation – The San Luis Obispo Tribune

August 9th, 2017 10:43 pm

Atascadero resident Jenn Foss was scrolling through her Facebook feed when she first learned of the California Coast Classic, a 525-mile bike ride along Highway 1 that benefits the Arthritis Foundation.

Its a cause that carries extra weight with Foss, a nurse at Wilshire Hospice in San Luis Obispo who sees the debilitating effects of arthritis on a daily basis. The 30-year-old Foss even deals with her own arthritis, stemming from a dirt bike crash when she was a teenager.

My mom also had to have knee surgeries on both knees when she was fairly young, Foss said in an email to The Tribune. And now working in hospice, geriatric arthritis pain is something that is a very real discomfort that many of the patients struggle with.

The 17th annual California Coast Classic which begins Sept. 9 in San Francisco and ends Sept. 16 in Los Angeles offered Foss and hundreds of others the opportunity to help raise funds needed to find a cure for arthritis.

Each rider must pay a registration fee and raise a minimum of $3,500 to join the tour. Foss has her own donation page set up online (donations are tax deductible) and had raised more than $1,400 as of Aug. 5 42 days before the race begins.

Foss also has two local fundraisers planned this month.

On Aug. 12, Foss will host a hotdog BBQ fundraiser and silent auction in the Grocery Outlet parking lot in Atascadero.

And from 8 a.m. until noon on Aug. 27, the Foss family plans to host a yard sale at their farm, located at 3300 Traffic Way in Atascadero.

As far as training and preparation for the bike ride, Foss said she fits in as much as she can while keeping an extremely tight schedule.

All I can say is thank goodness this is not a race everyone can do this in their own pace, Foss said. So far my mileage and timing is good. Im just working on a good diet, staying strong, keeping up with my cardio and being kind to my body.

Read the original post:
SLO County woman to bike 525 miles to raise money for Arthritis Foundation - The San Luis Obispo Tribune

Read More...

Rheumatoid arthritis – symptoms will not improve if patients do THIS – Express.co.uk

August 9th, 2017 10:42 pm

It affects more than 690,000 people in the UK, of which over 500,000 are women and around three-quarters are of working age.

People with rheumatoid arthritis experience a range of symptoms, including pain and swelling in the joints, tiredness and depression which can affect their daily lives.

The condition cannot be cured but can be treated.

Experts have revealed patients who smoke or are overweight however see fewer improvements in their symptoms.

A study by American and Canadian researchers found smoking and being overweight is more difficult for patients with rheumatoid arthritis to achieve optimal control of inflammation and symptoms.

Researchers from collected data on more than 1,100 patients.

"Early, aggressive treatment to achieve remission is the primary goal of therapy and can be best achieved early on when treating patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, as early disease control is associated with improved long-term outcomes," said Vivian Bykerk, senior investigator and director of the Inflammatory Arthritis Centre of Excellence at Hospital for Special Surgery.

"We have previously shown that individuals with excess weight are less likely to achieve sustained remission in the first three years after diagnosis.

Here we explore the impact of smoking and being overweight or obese on the ability to achieve good control of symptoms and inflammation in men and women with rheumatoid arthritis."

Researchers at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York analysed more than 1,109 patients who were being treated with methotrexate and other arthritis drugs.

The majority of patients were female, but among the women, 31 per cent were overweight, 32 per cent were obese and 15 per cent smoked. Among the males, 44 per cent were overweight and 35 per cent were obese and 22 per cent currently smoked.

Experts found less symptom improvement was also seen in patients who were overnight or obese compared with those of a healthy weight.

Current smokers also saw less symptom relief compared to nonsmoker over time.

The finding revealed the most dramatic differences in patients were seen in those who were overweight, or obese and smoked.

These patients had considerably worse outcomes over time compared to nonsmoking patients with a healthy weight.

"These results contribute to growing evidence of how lifestyle impacts how well patients may respond to treatment and the potential value of referring them to proven community-based smoking cessation and weight management programs," said Dr Bykerk.

DOES ARTHRITIS GET WORSE IN WINTER?

Read the rest here:
Rheumatoid arthritis - symptoms will not improve if patients do THIS - Express.co.uk

Read More...

Arthritic joints can be replaced in the hands – WRBL

August 9th, 2017 10:42 pm

COLUMBUS, Ga. 1 in 5 people over age 18 has doctor-diagnosed arthritis or more than 50 million adults. Arthritis wears down the cartilage, giving the bones in certain joints nothing to cushion them so they rub together and cause a lot of pain. Doctors can replace these arthritic joints in the fingers as well as the knees and hips.

Dr. Sean Blake is the director of the Hand Center at St. Francis Orthopaedic Institute. He says arthritis can make common everyday tasks painful.

Folding laundry, doing dishes, opening jars, shaking hands, opening the car door, turning the key. All those things are things people think they just have to deal with. Its just aging. But actually, we can actually help them with some good relief of pain, said Dr. Blake.

Those painful joints can be replaced.

Most common spots that well put joints in are what we call the Metatarsal Phalangea ljoints, your knuckles , or the middle knuckle which is the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint, said Dr. Blake.

Only regional anesthesia is used for the surgery, paralyzing the arm for about 12 hours.

We go on the back of the hand and make an incision, a Curvilinear incision so its curved so it actually doesnt scar as much and we literally have to cut out the piece of bone.

And insert the implant. The patient goes home the same day, wearing a splint. Physical therapy is required. Healing takes about 10 TO 12 weeks.

Here is the original post:
Arthritic joints can be replaced in the hands - WRBL

Read More...

23-year-old Lauren Reed not letting juvenile arthritis, two hip replacements slow her down – WXYZ

August 9th, 2017 10:42 pm

DETROIT - Lauren Reed is a pretty typical 23 year old woman. She very active and she loves to travel and explore, but just a few years ago she had trouble even getting up and out of bed.

"I totally shut down at one point and I wasnt motivated at all to do anything," explains Reed.

The problems started when she was injured playing basketball when she was 11 years old.

"That just sparked everything up. All my joints inflamed and I knew there was a bigger problem," she says.

After years of pain and few answers, Dr. Bernard Rubin diagnosed her with juvenile arthritis.

"She had developed severe arthritis and we needed to treat her aggressively," explains Dr. Rubin.

They used pills and injections, and less than a year ago Reed had not one, but two hip replacements.

"About three weeks in between and I was back to work in 7 weeks," says Reed. Her case is a very rare one.

Dr. Rubin explains, Its unusual to have arthritis as a child. There are only a few hundred thousand cases in the United States."

Surgery is scary, but it also brought reed the relief shes been looking for almost half her life

"It was terrible. I'd say nine out of ten pains. I couldn't stand for long periods of time. I couldnt play sports. Now I'm doing whatever, waking up feeling fantastic, going to work being more active. The surgeries just changed my life totally."

Now she plays basketball and works out at the gym, all while balancing work and school.

Reed is scheduled for another surgery -- a knee replacement -- in the next six months or so.

More here:
23-year-old Lauren Reed not letting juvenile arthritis, two hip replacements slow her down - WXYZ

Read More...

How a ‘space-age jelly bean’ cured my arthritis – Huddersfield Examiner

August 9th, 2017 10:42 pm

A dad-of-two has a spring in his step after being one of the first people in Yorkshire to have a space-age jelly bean fitted to his big toe to end his arthritis agony.

Mick Wood, 53, found himself at the cutting-edge of medical science when his toe was fitted with a Cartiva implant a spacer made of slippery, organic polymer.

It was fitted at Spire Elland by consultant orthopaedic surgeon Mr Kurt Haendlmayer who said: I call it a jelly bean for the big toe because that is what it looks and feels like.

It is just a squidgy bean-type thing that functions in a similar way to natural cartilage and allows much more movement in the toe than a traditional fusion operation would.

Mick had previously had a conventional fusion operation on his left big toe three years ago, so when he found himself in a similar situation with the right toe he thought the same procedure would be on the cards.

However, Mr Haendlmayer suggested that for someone fit and active, the new implant would produce better results.

I was a bit apprehensive at first it all seemed a bit Tomorrows World-ish for me, said Mick.

But Mr Haendlmayer gave me lots of information about the success of similar operations in America and it didnt take me long to decide I was happy with the whole thing.

It was obviously a new procedure because when I went in for the operation there were a load of other people in there simply to observe it taking place I felt like I was a bit of a celebrity!

In a conventional fusion procedure, the additional bone build-up around the joint (osteophytes) and the usually very ragged, degenerated joint surfaces, are scraped away before the toe joint is secured with screws and a plate, making it immobile. Up until recently that was the gold standard of toe surgery.

Mr Haendlmayer added: This does alleviate the pain caused by the arthritis but, on the down-side, it means the toe is now held rigid by the metalwork which, in turn, limits the amount of movement possible by the toe.

With the Cartiva implant the extra bone is also cleared, but instead of making the joint immobile, we fix metal rods in both the toe and the socket and introduce the implant which cushions the area where the toe and the foot meet, just as normal cartilage would.

Mick, from Pontefract, is delighted with the results, saying he was now virtually pain-free and able to run, kneel and even drive for long distances.

To be honest, I wasnt unhappy with the previous fusion operation it certainly relieved a lot of the pain but this one seems much, much better and the movement I have in the toe is unbelievable.

I might be one of the first in this area to have a jelly bean toe but I dont think I will be the last.

More here:
How a 'space-age jelly bean' cured my arthritis - Huddersfield Examiner

Read More...

UVA School of Medicine Using Grant to Research Rare Genetic Disorder – NBC 29 News

August 9th, 2017 10:42 pm

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (WVIR) -

The University of Virginia School of Medicine is using a $50,000 donation to further research for an un-named, rare genetic disorder.

The money comes from the Bow Foundation which works to help people affected by the disease. Right now the disease is fairly new; it was only discovered in the past year and has only 50 known patients.

The disorder has mainly been targeting children, and can cause seizures, severe development delays, and movement disorders.

"By making the cells that we're making from the first patients, we'll then be able to compare those cells with other researchers and really broaden the research in this field. In a way that wouldn't be possible without this initial funding, Mike McConnell, UVA professor and researcher, said.

The hospital says they still know very little about this disease, but the funding is a step in the right direction.

Follow this link:
UVA School of Medicine Using Grant to Research Rare Genetic Disorder - NBC 29 News

Read More...

Page 946«..1020..945946947948..960970..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick