header logo image


Page 600«..1020..599600601602..610620..»

Evotec Makes Move into Gene Therapy with Takeda… – Labiotech.eu

April 11th, 2020 3:55 am

German biotech giant Evotec has moved into gene therapy and partnered with Takeda to develop new therapies in oncology, rare diseases, neuroscience, and gastroenterology.

The two companies did not reveal financial details of the collaboration, but did say that it will be a multi-year alliance that adds to Evotecs existing deal with the big pharma that stretches back more than 10 years. The four therapy areas they will concentrate on align with Takedas core therapeutic focus.

The alliance with Takeda gives us a head start, Evotec CEO Werner Lanthaler told me. Takeda has strong experience in gene therapy and we are proud that they have chosen us as a partner.

Evotec also announced it will be opening a 20-person R&D site in Austria, in Orth an der Donau, to work on its gene therapies. While this will be run independently from the Takeda deal, according to Lanthaler, he said the discussions around the collaboration happened at the same time as the gene therapy site was being set up.

The site known as Evotec GT will be led by Friedrich Scheiflinger, who worked for Takeda before moving to Evotec. According to a statement from Evotec, the team has worked together for many years and as well as a focus on gene therapy techniques, has expertise in virology and blood disorders, as well as metabolic and muscle diseases.

Gene therapy has undergone a revolution in recent years and has changed dramatically since the 90s. With approvals of therapies such as the eye gene therapy Luxturna in 2018, many companies are now investing in and working to develop similar therapies.

One reason Evotec cites for moving into this area is the potential for rapid market growth. At present, there are only a few gene therapies on the market, but there are many in development. The value of the market is expected to reach 4.6B by 2025, a dramatic increase from 459M in 2018.

Evotec is also working on various other advanced therapies, including cell therapy with its EVOcells platform. The company announced last week that it made a licensing and investment agreement with Canadian biotech panCELLa, a company modifying cell therapies to evade the immune system and prevent rejection. Evotec additionally has a PanOmics platform that combines transcriptomics and proteomics data to find new drug targets.

After expanding our biologics capabilities through the acquisition of Just Evotec Biologics in 2019, Evotec GT is yet another important piece to complete the multimodality puzzle, explained Lathaler.

The timing was ideal, as Evotec GT brings our existing expertise in the gene therapy field to a new level. It also has close technological ties especially to our induced pluripotent stem cells and PanOmics platforms, so these platforms can grow and gain traction together.

Image from Shutterstock

See original here:
Evotec Makes Move into Gene Therapy with Takeda... - Labiotech.eu

Read More...

Small molecules, biologics and now gene therapies: Germany’s Evotec adds another feather to its R&D cap – Endpoints News

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

German drug discovery company Evotec which has a thriving rolodex of biopharma partners such as Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda is now venturing into gene therapies.

The company swallowed Seattle-based Just Biotherapeutics, a company focused on reducing the cost of manufacturing protein therapies last year. It is now setting up a dedicated R&D site for gene therapies in Austria, in an effort to achieve a modality-agnostic repertoire small molecules, biologics and now gene therapies.

The site will be run by a team of twenty researchers led by Friedrich Scheiflinger, who worked for Baxalta, Shire and Takeda. The scientists have expertise in vectorology and virology as well as disease insights, in particular in hemophilia, hematology, metabolic and muscle diseases.

In recent years, precision medicines based on cell and gene therapies have emerged and are predicted to grow significantly. Gene therapy is a promising approach to the development of genetic medicines for patients, especially for inherited and rare diseases, said Evotec chief Werner Lanthaler in a statement.

Cell and gene therapies are not easy to develop and are prohibitively expensive to manufacture.A combined $2 billion has been set aside by nearly a dozen drugmakers including Pfizer and Novartis for gene therapy manufacturing since 2018, according to an analysis by Reuters in November.

Read more:
Small molecules, biologics and now gene therapies: Germany's Evotec adds another feather to its R&D cap - Endpoints News

Read More...

Gene Therapy Market Set for 3X Expansion Between 2020 and 2026; COVID-19 Stimulating Development of Multiple Therapeutic Approaches: Fact.MR -…

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Niche players in the global gene therapy market must leverage greater government expenditure and upgrade their existing infrastructure along with expanding their gene therapy centers for sustaining their market hegemony.

ROCKVILLE, MD / ACCESSWIRE / April 8, 2020 / Global gene therapy market is poised for robust growth with net revenue pool set to exceed approximately US$ 5 Bn by 2026 end. The market is receiving tailwinds from advancements in synthetic biology. On that premise, the gene therapy market will expand 3X through over the forecast period, projects Fact.MR (2020-2026).

"Certain types of cancer such as Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and lymphoblastic leukemia are contributing to high mortality rates across the world. Gene therapy is gaining increasing recognition in its immense potential for treating rare diseases. Continued research and development in the area of gene therapy is supporting market growth as well," states Fact.MR.

Request PDF sample of the 170-page report on the Gene Therapy Market-

https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=S&rep_id=4648

Gene Therapy Market - Key Findings

Gene Therapy Market - Key Driving Factors

Explore 59 tables and 79 figures of the study. Request TOC of the report at-

https://www.factmr.com/report/4648/gene-therapy-market

Gene Therapy Market - Key Restraints

Impact of COVID-19 on Gene Therapy Market

In view of ongoing onslaught of COVID-19 pandemic, the focus of major healthcare authorities of the world has gravitated towards developing vaccines for the deadly respiratory disease. Gene therapy is one such area of research which could help boost antibodies required to treat patients infected with Coronavirus. For instance, Generation Bio is exploring the potential role of gene therapy in treating COVID-19 patients. Hence, the global gene therapy market will benefit from the outbreak in that market players are rushing to develop multiple therapeutic approaches for SARS-CoV-2. Growing fears of similar Coronavirus outbreaks in the future will continue accelerating the development of gene therapy as well.

Competitive Landscape

Prominent players profiled in this Fact.MR study include, but are not limited to, Orchard Therapeutics Limited, CELGENE CORPORATION, Spark Therapeutics, Inc., Sibiono GeneTech Co. Ltd., Spark Therapeutics Inc., Gilead Sciences Inc., and Novartis AG. Developed regions remain the key focus area of major stakeholders in the global gene therapy market. Existing gene therapy centers are being prioritized by market players in order to utilize the full extent of their resources. Moreover, they are benefitting from success rates associated with gene therapy and faster drug approvals. Gilead Sciences Inc. expanded their gene therapy centers to a total of 90 recently.

About the Report

This 170-page study offers in-depth commentary on the gene therapy market. The study provides compelling insights on the gene therapy market on the basis of product (yescarta, kymriah, luxturna, strimvelis, and gendicine), application (ophthalmology, oncology, Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency- Severe Combined Immunodeficiency) across three regions (The United States, Europe, and Rest of the World).

Explore Fact.MR's Comprehensive Coverage on Healthcare Landscape

Foot Orthotic Insoles Market - Get Fact.MR's comprehensive insights on the global foot orthotic insoles market covering segmental analysis, region-wise data, and market players for the predefined projection period (2020-2026).

Automated External Defibrillators Market - Fact.MR's latest analysis on the global automated external defibrillators market encompasses qualitative and quantitative insights for the course of forecast period (2020-2025).

Foley Catheters Market - Know more about the key influencing factors, major drivers, opportunities, and challenges for the global foley catheters market through Fact.MR in-depth study during 2020-2027.

About Fact.MR

Expert analysis, actionable insights, and strategic recommendations of the veteran research team at Fact.MR helps clients from across the globe with their unique business intelligence requirements. With a repository of over thousand reports and 1 million+ data points, the team has scrutinized the Healthcare industry across 50+ countries for over a decade. The team provides unmatched end-to-end research and consulting services. Fact.MR's healthcare market reports and industry analysis help businesses navigate challenges and take critical decisions with confidence and clarity amidst breakneck competition.

Contact:

Fact.MR11140 Rockville PikeSuite 400Rockville, MD 20852United StatesEmail: sales@factmr.comWeb: https://www.factmr.com/PR- https://www.factmr.com/media-release/1409/global-gene-therapy-market

SOURCE: FactMR

View source version on accesswire.com: https://www.accesswire.com/584395/Gene-Therapy-Market-Set-for-3X-Expansion-Between-2020-and-2026-COVID-19-Stimulating-Development-of-Multiple-Therapeutic-Approaches-FactMR

See more here:
Gene Therapy Market Set for 3X Expansion Between 2020 and 2026; COVID-19 Stimulating Development of Multiple Therapeutic Approaches: Fact.MR -...

Read More...

Symptoms in ALS Mouse Model Improve with CRISPR Base Editing – The Scientist

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Base editors, which convert one nucleotide to another without a double-strand DNA break, have the potential to treat diseases caused by mutant genes. One drawback, though, is that the DNA that encodes CRISPR base editors is longtoo long to fit in the adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) most commonly used for gene therapy. In a study published in Molecular Therapy on January 13, researchers split the DNA encoding a base editor into two AAV vectors and injected them into a mouse model of inherited amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The strategy disabled the disease-causing gene, improving the animals symptoms and prolonging their lives.

Wed like to be able to make gene editing tools that can fit inside an AAV vector. Unfortunately, some of the tools are so big that they cant fit inside, so in this study, they were able to come up with a solution to that by using a split protein, says David Segal, a biochemist at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in the work. Its not the first time that that system has been used, but its the first time its been applied to this kind of base editor.

Pablo Perez-Pinera, a bioengineer at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and colleagues developed a strategy to split the base editor into two chunks. In a study published in 2019, they generated two different AAV vectors, each containing a portion of coding DNA for an adenine-to-thymine base editor. They also included sequences encoding so-called inteinsshort peptides that when they are expressed within proteins stick together and cleave themselves out, a bit like introns in RNA. The researchers built the inteins into the vectors such that when the inteins produced by the two vectors dimerized, bringing the two base editor parts together, and then excised themselves, they left behind a full-length, functional base editor.

When Perez-Pinera told Thomas Gaj, also a bioengineer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, about the strategy, Gaj tells The Scientist,they immediately set out to test it in a mouse model of ALS. The transgenic mice have about 25 copies of the human gene, superoxide dismutase 1(SOD1), with mutations that cause ALS in people. The animals display motor neuron loss and muscle atrophy, plus their neurons accumulate inclusionsdense spots in the gray and white matter of their spinal cords that include SOD1 proteinbefore dying at about four months of age on average. The symptoms and life expectancy in the 20 percent of ALS patients with mutations in SOD1vary based on which mutation they have, but most have muscle weakness and motor neuron death, as well as inclusions containing SOD1 protein.

Instead of using the adenine-to-thymine base editor, the researchers developed a cytosine-to-thymine converter using the coding sequence of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 and a guide RNA that targets both wild type and mutant human SOD1 to create an early stop codon. This doesnt affect the mouse SOD1. In human cells, the split base editor seemed to be even more efficient than when the editor was transfected at full length, hitting about 29 percent of the target sites, compared to the full-length editors 19 percent.

Next the authors packaged their split base editor into two AAV backbones and injected them or a control AAV into the animals lumbar cerebrospinal fluid when they were around two months old. The vectors ended up primarily in astrocytes, as well as in neurons and microglia. While the researchers didnt see a difference in symptom onset at around three months, the mice that received the base editor maintained their weight and lived about 10 percent longer than controls. The treated mice also had fewer SOD1-positive inclusions and healthier motor neurons.

In this cross section of the spinal cord of a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), researchers delivered a CRISPR base editing system (yellow) to astrocytes (red) in order to disable the expression of a mutant gene and reduce symptoms.

Colin Lim, University of Illinois

Using base editors to disable the mutant SOD1 gene in astrocytes (a cell type that normally supports healthy nervous system function but in SOD1-ALS exerts toxicity onto motor neurons) led to a marked slowing in disease progression, Gaj writes in an email to The Scientist. Since many persons with ALS are diagnosed following the onset of symptoms, pre-clinical strategies that can meaningfully slow the disease are especially important and should be further studied.

This is a good indication that base editing actually can be used to treat ALS, says Baisong Lu, a gene therapy researcher at Wake Forest School of Medicine who did not participate in the work. He cautions that off-target effectsthe base editor can edit both DNA and RNAand how long the AAV delivery method lasts are both in need of more work before this technique would be safe for people.

The dual AAV strategy could also be expensive, says Mimoun Azzouz, a neuroscientist at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Thinking about the clinical development and marketing and the commercialization of this product, you need to manufacture two viruses, and you need to assess these two viruses for safety, so the cost can be extremely high.

Despite the challenges, the strategy shows promise for translation to humans, Perez-Pinera writes in an email to The Scientist.AAVs are already approved by the Food and Drug Administration for gene therapy, he explains. Plus, using a humanized model of the diseasea mouse that contains the human sequence of the target genemeans that the method validated in mouse models can be translated to people without adapting them to target a different sequence. People who develop ALS due to a mutation in SOD1also have one good copy of the gene, just like the mice, which have a functioning mouse copy.

We injected animal models shortly before disease onset. While injecting the animals earlier could improve the outcome of the disease as demonstrated in other studies, the reality is that ALS is not typically diagnosed until the patient experiences symptoms. Our study predicts what can be expected from treating a patient recently diagnosed with the disease, Perez-Pinera writes.

We still have some distance to travel before the results in our current study can benefit ALS patients, Gaj acknowledges. The researchers are working on minimizing off target effects and on developing new delivery methods that could improve efficacy. We still have a number of important questions to answer and technological hurdles to address before we begin thinking about clinical translation.

C.K.W. Lim et al., Treatment of a mouse model of ALS by in vivo base editing,Molecular Therapy,doi:10.1016/ j.ymthe.2020.01.005, 2020.

Abby Olena is a freelance journalist based in Alabama. Find her on Twitter@abbyolena.

Read more from the original source:
Symptoms in ALS Mouse Model Improve with CRISPR Base Editing - The Scientist

Read More...

The PBS documentary The Gene showcases genetics promise and pitfalls – Science News

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

The genetic code to alllife on Earth, both simple and complex, comes down to four basic letters: A, C,T and G.

Untangling the role thatthese letters play in lifes blueprint has allowed scientists to understandwhat makes everything from bacteria to people the way they are. But as researchershave learned more, they have also sought ways to tinker with this blueprint,bringing ethical dilemmas into the spotlight. The Gene, a two-part PBS documentary from executive producer Ken Burnsairing April 7 and 14, explores the benefits and risks that come withdeciphering lifes code.

The film begins with oneof those ethical challenges. The opening moments describe how biophysicist HeJiankui used the gene-editing tool CRISPR/Cas9 to alter the embryos of twin girls who were born in China in 2018 (SN: 12/17/18). Worldwide, criticscondemned the move, claiming it was irresponsible to change the girls DNA, asexperts dont yet fully understand the consequences.

This moment heraldedthe arrival of a new era, narrator David Costabile says. An era in whichhumans are no longer at the mercy of their genes, but can control and evenchange them.

Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your inbox

The story sets the stagefor a prominent theme throughout the documentary: While genetics holdsincredible potential to improve the lives of people with genetic diseases,there are always those who will push science to its ethical limits. But thedriving force in the film is the inquisitive nature of the scientistsdetermined to uncover what makes us human.

The Gene, based on the book of the same name by Siddhartha Mukherjee (SN:12/18/16), one of the documentarys executive producers, highlights many ofthe most famous discoveries in genetics. The film chronicles Gregor Mendels classicpea experiments describing inheritance and how experts ultimately revealed inthe 1940s that DNA a so-called stupid molecule composed of just four chemicalbases, adenine (A), thymine (T),cytosine (C) and guanine (G) is responsible for storing geneticinformation. Historical footage, inBurns typical style, brings to life stories describing the discovery of DNAshelical structure in the 1950s and the success of the Human Genome Project indecoding the human genetic blueprint in 2003.

The film also touches ona few of the ethical violations that came from these discoveries. The eugenicsmovement in both Nazi Germany and the United States in the early 20th century aswell as the story of the first person to die in a clinical trial for genetherapy, in 1999, cast a morbid shadow on the narrative.

Interwoven into thistimeline are personal stories from people who suffer from genetic diseases.These vignettes help viewers grasp the hope new advances can give patients asexperts continue to wrangle with DNA in efforts to make those cures.

In the documentarysfirst installment, which focuses on the early days of genetics, viewers meet a family whose daughter is grappling with arare genetic mutation that causes her nerve cells to die. The family searchesfor a cure alongside geneticist Wendy Chung of Columbia University. The secondpart follows efforts to master the human genome and focuses on AudreyWinkelsas, a molecular biologist at the National Institutes of Health studyingspinal muscular atrophy, a disease she herself has, and a family fighting tosave their son from a severe form of the condition.

For science-interested viewers, the documentary does not disappoint. The Gene covers what seems to be every angle of genetics history from the ancient belief that sperm absorbed mystical vapors to pass traits down to offspring to the discovery of DNAs structure to modern gene editing. But the stories of the scientists and patients invested in overcoming diseases like Huntingtons and cancer make the film all the more captivating.

Originally posted here:
The PBS documentary The Gene showcases genetics promise and pitfalls - Science News

Read More...

SNUH team finds causal gene of inherited retinal disorder – Korea Biomedical Review

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

A group of Korean researchers said they have confirmed a gene responsible for inherited retinal disorders (IRD) among Koreans.

IRD is a combination of several rare diseases that usually develops at a young age and progresses slowly over the lifetime. The patients gradually lose their sight, and most of them eventually lose their vision entirely due to continuous retinal cell degeneration.

The Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) Department of Ophthalmology and Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) Department of Laboratory Medicine jointly conducted the study.

Currently, antioxidant therapy, artificial retinal transplantation, and stem cell therapy are being used to treat the disorder regardless of mutations, but the only viable treatment is gene therapy. Even when gene therapy is possible, only less than 1 percent of all IRD patients can be treated with it.

In the West, genetic abnormalities of these retinal diseases have been studied and known well. However, researches on Korean cases are still lacking, and the joint research team tackled the subject to find the causative gene for IRDs with 86 domestic patients, the team said in a news release on Wednesday.

The team studied and identified the gene responsible for the disorders by using the latest technique of gene analysis with the most number of patients who have been reported so far.

The study revealed that only 44 percent of the patients, 38 out of 86, possessed the causal gene for IRDs. Even among the patients with retinitis pigmentosa, the most common disorder among the IRDs, only 41 percent had the causative gene.

The causative genes could be quite diverse even in the same disorder. The patients can find a responsible gene only when they receive genetic counseling very actively and can receive gene counseling, too, the research team explained.

Differences were found in the type and frequency of causal gene mutations between Korean and Western cases. However, there were similarities between those of Korean and other Asian nations, including Japan.

The research and diagnosis environment for IRDs has been very poor until now, and our study has significance as a basic data for diagnosis and treatment for Korean patients with IRDs, SNUH Department of Ophthalmology Professor Woo Se-joon said.

Patients need to receive causal gene tests actively to provide the domestic medical communities with sufficient data, and a list of patients who can be treated. By doing so, clinical trials and new drug development in gene therapy will progress smoothly, he added.

Previously, only a few hospitals could diagnose the causative gene for IRDs and afford to test and treat IRD patients due to the high cost of genetic testing. Recently, however, the chance of diagnosis has increased as more hospitals are conducting genetic tests amid the lowered cost thanks to insurance benefits.

Also, the therapeutic opportunity for IRD patients is likely to get broadened, as the retinal pigment epithelium 65 gene (RPE65) therapy won approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the first time in the world.

Although we do not have a clear way to prevent IRDs at the moment, the prediction of risk and their early detection are developing through the discovery of family history and causative genes, Professor Woo said. Early diagnosis can prevent impaired vision by gene therapy and vision correction, and the patients will be able to choose appropriate jobs with social activities.

Also taking part in the research team were Professors Joo Kwang-sic and Park Kyu-hyung of SNUBH and Professors Seong Moon-woo and Park Sung-sup of SNUH.

The results of this study were published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science.

shim531@docdocdoc.co.kr

< Korea Biomedical Review, All rights reserved.>

View post:
SNUH team finds causal gene of inherited retinal disorder - Korea Biomedical Review

Read More...

Enochian Biosciences Announces Scientific Presentations at the American Society of Cell and Gene Therapy (ASCGT) Annual Meeting – Yahoo Finance

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

LOS ANGELES, April 09, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Enochian Biosciences, a company focused on gene-modified cellular therapy in infectious disease and cancer,announces that all three submissions to the 23rd Annual Meeting of the ASCGT were accepted for presentation. The Conference will be held virtually May 12-15, 2020.

Dr. Serhat Gumruku, inventor and co-founder, will have two presentations: Hijacking HBV Pol to Induce Apoptosis Specifically in Infected HepatocytesIn Vivo: A Novel Approach for Potential Treatment or Cure; and Increased Engraftment of Gene Modified HSPCs Overexpressing ALDH1 UsingIn VivoChemoselection. Dr. Ramesh Halder, Senior Staff Scientist, will present: Gene Modified CD34+Cells With Increased ALDH1 Expression ConfersIn VitroProtection Against Cyclophosphamide.

Forward-Looking StatementsStatements in this press release that are not strictly historical in nature are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions based on current information and expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the success or efficacy of our pipeline. All statements other than historical facts are forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as believes, plans, expects, aims, intends potential, or similar expressions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those projected in any of such statements due to various uncertainties, including as set forth in Enochians most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement and Enochian undertakes no obligation to revise or update this press release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

Contact: ir@enochianbio.com

More here:
Enochian Biosciences Announces Scientific Presentations at the American Society of Cell and Gene Therapy (ASCGT) Annual Meeting - Yahoo Finance

Read More...

UGA’s Landon Clark named 2020 Goldwater Scholar – University of Georgia

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

University of Georgia Honors student Landon Clark is among 396 undergraduates across the nation to be recognized as Barry Goldwater Scholars, earning the highest undergraduate award of its type for the fields of the natural sciences, mathematics and engineering.

Clark, from Leesburg, is a third-year CURO Honors Scholar who is triple majoring in biochemistry and molecular biology, genetics and biology.

Since 1995, 61 UGA students have received the Goldwater Scholarship, which recognizes exceptional sophomores and juniors across the United States.

The University of Georgia is proud of Landon and pleased that he is extending our record of success in this prestigious competition, said President Jere W. Morehead. Already as an undergraduate student, he is helping UGA fulfill our commitment to conduct research that helps people lead longer, healthier lives.

This year, recipients were selected from a field of more than 5,000 college sophomores and juniors who were nominated by 461 academic institutions nationwide. Each awardee will receive up to $7,500 toward the cost of tuition, fees, books, and room and board.

Of this years Goldwater Scholars, 50 are mathematics and computer science majors, 287 are majoring in the natural sciences and 59 are majoring in engineering.

I am thrilled for Landon, who is absolutely one of our very best students, said David S. Williams, associate provost and director of the Honors Program, who serves as the UGA campus faculty representative for the Goldwater Scholarship. As a CURO Honors Scholar, Landon was recruited to come to UGA because of his promise as a researcher. This Goldwater award and recognition proves that his hard work is paying off. I look forward to watching his career continue to blossom in the future.

Clarks long-term plans include pursuing an MD/PhD in immunology, performing translational research on immune diseases using gene and immunotherapy techniques, and teaching at a university. As a translational researcher specializing in immunology, he plans to use gene therapy techniques to treat and cure immune disorders in humans.

Since his first weeks as a UGA freshman in August 2017, Clark has conducted research in the lab of Michael Terns, Distinguished Research Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He researches the complex processes of CRISPR-Cas immune systems through a model archaeal organism, Pyrococcus furiosus. Now a junior, he has collaborated on three different projects, co-authored a paper, and mentors other undergraduates in this field.

Last summer, he worked in the translational research lab of H. Trent Spencer, a professor of pediatrics and director of the gene and cell therapy program at Emorys Winship Cancer Institute. There, Clark researched immune diseases and potential gene therapy techniques. In 2017, he also conducted research on sociological variables influencing educational inequality with Dawn Robinson, a professor of sociology at UGA.

Clark is a Crane Leadership Scholar, director of academic outreach for the Student Government Association, director of internal communications for UGA Red Cross, an exam writer for UGA Science Olympiad Outreach, co-president of the Biochemistry Undergraduate Society, co-president of the Omicron Delta Kappa National Honor Society, and treasurer of the Honors Program Student Council. He also volunteers in the neuroscience and cardiology units at Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center.

Clark has presented his research at 10 conferences. He also studied neurology and cancer biology through UGAs Studies Abroad Program in Cortona, located in Tuscany, Italy.

The scholarship honoring Sen. Barry Goldwater was created to encourage outstanding students to pursue careers in the fields of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering. Since its first award in 1989, the Barry Goldwater Scholarship and Excellence in Education Foundation has bestowed 8,628 scholarships worth more than $68 million.

See the article here:
UGA's Landon Clark named 2020 Goldwater Scholar - University of Georgia

Read More...

Gene Therapy Market 2020: Competitive Landscape and Recent Industry Development Analysis by Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc., bluebird bio, Inc., uniQure…

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Global Gene Therapy Market report underlines the specific study of the Biotechnology industry which explains what the market definition, classifications, applications, engagements, and global industry trends are. The market data analyses and evaluated in this Gene Therapy market report makes you achieve the business goals and objectives in preset time frame. It highlights a wide-ranging evaluation of the markets growth prospects and restrictions. This report is very useful to all sizes of business which makes it simpler to take informed decisions regarding different facets of industry. Gene Therapy market report truly acts as a backbone to the business.

A finest market research report acts as an innovative solution for the businesses in todays changing market place and hence this Gene Therapy report is generated. Key players in the market, major collaborations, merger and acquisitions along with trending innovation and business policies are also reviewed in this Gene Therapy report. The report has a list of key competitors with the required specifications and also provides the strategic insights and analysis of the key factors influencing the industry. The data and information of the Gene Therapy report not only helps business make data-driven decisions but also guarantees maximum return on investment (ROI).

Get the inside scope of the Sample report @https://www.theinsightpartners.com/sample/TIPHE100001165/

MARKET INTRODUCTION

Gene therapy is introduction of DNA into a patient to treat a genetic disease or a disorder. The newly inserted DNA contains a correcting gene to correct the effects of disease causing mutations. Gene therapy is promising treatment for the genetic diseases and also includes cystic fibrosis and muscular dystrophy. Gene therapy is suitable treatment for the infectious diseases, inherited disease and cancer.

Key Competitors In Market are Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc., bluebird bio, Inc., uniQure N.V., AveXis, Vineti, Solid Biosciences., Spark Therapeutics, Inc., CHIMERON BIO, RENOVA THERAPEUTICS, and HORAMA S.A.

MARKET SCOPE

The Global Gene Therapy Market Analysis to 2025 is a specialized and in-depth study of the gene therapy industry with a focus on the global market trend. The report aims to provide an overview of global gene therapy market with detailed market segmentation by cell type, application, and geography. The global gene therapy market is expected to witness high growth during the forecast period. The report provides key statistics on the market status of the leading market players and offers key trends and opportunities in the market.

Market segmentation:

By Cell Type (Somatic Gene Therapy, Germline Gene Therapy);

By Application (Genetic Disorder, Cancer, Neurological Disorder, and Others)

By Geography North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (APAC), Middle East and Africa (MEA) and South & Central America. And 13 countries globally along with current trend and opportunities prevailing in the region.

REASONS TO BUY

Save and reduce time carrying out entry-level research by identifying the growth, size, leading players and segments in the wound irrigation system market.

Highlights key business priorities in order to assist companies to realign their business strategies.The key findings and recommendations highlight crucial progressive industry trends in the global wound irrigation system market, thereby allowing players across the value chain to develop effective long-term strategies.

Develop/modify business expansion plans by using substantial growth offering developed and emerging markets.

Scrutinize in-depth global market trends and outlook coupled with the factors driving the market, as well as those hindering it.

Enhance the decision-making process by understanding the strategies that underpin security interest with respect to client products, segmentation, pricing and distribution.

Click to buy full report with all description:-https://www.theinsightpartners.com/buy/TIPHE100001165/

About Us:

The Insight Partners is a one stop industry research provider of actionable intelligence. We help our clients in getting solutions to their research requirements through our syndicated and consulting research services. We are committed to provide highest quality research and consulting services to our customers. We help our clients understand the key market trends, identify opportunities, and make informed decisions with our market research offerings at an affordable cost.We understand syndicated reports may not meet precise research requirements of all our clients. We offer our clients multiple ways to customize research as per their specific needs and budget

Contact Us:The Insight Partners,Phone: +1-646-491-9876Email: [emailprotected]

Read more here:
Gene Therapy Market 2020: Competitive Landscape and Recent Industry Development Analysis by Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc., bluebird bio, Inc., uniQure...

Read More...

EuroBiotech ReportAZ, GSK in COVID-19, $8B funding call, CRUK cuts and Evotec – FierceBiotech

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Welcome to the latest edition of our weekly EuroBiotech Report. We start this week with AstraZeneca, which revealed it aims to have a COVID-19-neutralizing antibody in the clinic in the next three to five months. AstraZeneca's compatriot GlaxoSmithKline also shared an update on its COVID-19 activities. GSK added Xiamen Innovax Biotech to the list of organizations it is working with on a COVID-19 vaccine. While those are just two of the many initiatives targeting COVID-19, Wellcome is worried about a funding shortfall. Wellcome wants businesses to commit $8 billion this month to keep programs moving forward quickly. Researchers working outside of COVID-19 are faring worse still, with Cancer Research UK responding to the pandemic with deep cuts. Away from COVID-19, Evotec entered the gene therapy space through a deal with Takeda. And more. Nick Taylor1. AstraZeneca targets summer start for COVID-19 antibody trial

AstraZeneca has outlined its multipronged approach to the development of antibodies against the pandemic SARS-CoV-2 virus. The Big Pharma is applying its own discovery capabilities to the task and helping to evaluate candidates identified by academic partners in China and the U.S.2. GSK allies with Innovax for COVID-19 vaccine R&D project

GlaxoSmithKline has teamed up with Xiamen Innovax Biotech to evaluate a vaccine against the novel coronavirus behind the COVID-19 pandemic. The agreement gives Innovax access to a GSK adjuvant to enhance the immune response triggered by its recombinant protein-based vaccine.3. Wellcome targets $8B raise in weeks to fix COVID-19 funding gap

Virtual Clinical Trials Online

This virtual event will bring together industry experts to discuss the increasing pace of pharmaceutical innovation, the need to maintain data quality and integrity as new technologies are implemented and understand regulatory challenges to ensure compliance.

Wellcome is calling on businesses to invest in an $8 billion (7 billion) fund focused on reducing cases of COVID-19 to zero as soon as possible. Almost half the money is earmarked for the development of drugs and vaccines that Wellcome sees as the worlds best exit strategy from the pandemic.4. COVID-19 claims Cancer Research UK funding cuts, forecasting major shortfall

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) said it has been forced to take the difficult decision to make deep funding cuts across its grants and institutes as the fallout from the pandemic continues to affect all areas of biomedical research.

5. Evotec allies with Takeda to move into gene therapy R&D

Evotec has allied with Takeda to expand into gene therapy research. The move sees Evotec establish a 20-person team in Austria, the focal point of Takedas gene therapy operation, and sign up to work on programs for its Japanese partner.And more articles of note>>

Go here to see the original:
EuroBiotech ReportAZ, GSK in COVID-19, $8B funding call, CRUK cuts and Evotec - FierceBiotech

Read More...

Research on Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market (impact of COVID-19) 2020-2026 Spark Therapeutics, Freeline Therapeutics, Sangamo Therapeutics, Ultragenyx…

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Detailed market survey on the Global Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Research Report 2020-2026. It analyses the vital factors of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market supported present business Strategy, Hemophilia Gene Therapy market demands, business methods utilised by Hemophilia Gene Therapy market players and therefore the future prospects from numerous angles well. Business associatealysis could be a market assessment tool utilized by business and analysts to grasp the quality of an business. Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market report It helps them get a sense of what is happening in an industry, i.e., demand-supply statistics, Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market degree of competition within the industry, Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market competition of the business with different rising industries, future prospects of the business.

NOTE: Hemophilia Gene Therapy reports include the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry. Our new sample is updated which correspond in new report showing impact of Covid-19 on Industry trends. Also we are offering 20% discount

Obtain sample copy of Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report: https://calibreresearch.com/report/global-hemophilia-gene-therapy-market-4387#request-sample

The Global Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market report is a fully analyzed and intelligent study of the international industry that focuses on a wide range of significant elements such as market size in terms of value and volume, regional growth analysis, competition and segmentation. It is considered as extraordinary findings that accountable to offer insightful details into some essential attributes related to the global Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market 2020. The detailed investigation of this report has been carried out by the list of skillful researchers and investigators with a deep analysis of current industry trends, availability of distinct opportunities, drivers, openings and limitation that influence the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market on the global scale.

The Global Hemophilia Gene Therapy market worth about xx billion USD in 2020 and it is expected to reach xx billion USD in 2026 with an average growth rate of x%. United States is the largest production of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market and consumption region in the world, Europe also play important roles in global Hemophilia Gene Therapy market while China is fastest growing region.

Checkout Inquiry For Buying or Customization of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Report: https://calibreresearch.com/report/global-hemophilia-gene-therapy-market-4387#inquiry-for-buying

Geographically, Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue. The major regions involved in Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market are (United States, EU, China, and Japan).

Leading companies reviewed in the Hemophilia Gene Therapy report are:

Spark TherapeuticsFreeline TherapeuticsSangamo TherapeuticsUltragenyxuniQureShire PLCBioMarinBioverativ

Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Product Type Segmentation As Provided Below:The Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market report is segmented into following categories:

The product segment of the report offers product market information such as demand, supply and market value of the product.

The application of product in terms of USD value is represented in numerical and graphical format for all the major regional markets.The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report is segmented into Type by following categories;Hemophilia AHemophilia B

The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report is segmented into Application by following categories;Hemophilia A Gene TherapyHemophilia B Gene Therapy

Reportedly, the massive growth graph in the research and development sectors will be liable to generate plenty of excellent opportunities in the upcoming years. The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market is a valuable resource of insightful information for specific business strategists. Apart from this, it also offers an in-depth summary of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market along with growth assessment, revenue share, demand & supply data, historical as well as futuristic amount etc. A group of research analysts offers a detailed description of the value chain and its distributors info. Moreover, the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market study report delivers comprehensive information regarding the global industry that enhances the scope, understanding and application of the same.

Checkout FREE Report Sample of Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market Report for Better Understanding: https://calibreresearch.com/report/global-hemophilia-gene-therapy-market-4387#request-sample

Industry analysis, for an entrepreneur or a company, is a method that helps it to understand its position relative to other participants in the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market. It helps them to identify both the opportunities and threats coming their way and gives them a strong idea of the present and future scenario of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy industry. The key to extant during this changing business setting is to know the variations between yourself and your competitors within the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market. The deep research study of Hemophilia Gene Therapy market based on development opportunities, growth limiting factors and feasibility of investment will forecast the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market growth.

Finally, The global research document on the Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market discovers a large set of information regarding the competitive business environment and other substantial components. The prime aim of these major competitors is to focus on improved technologies and newer innovations.

More:
Research on Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market (impact of COVID-19) 2020-2026 Spark Therapeutics, Freeline Therapeutics, Sangamo Therapeutics, Ultragenyx...

Read More...

Cancer Gene Therapy Market Scope Analysis 2019-2025 – Science In Me

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market is valued at USD XX million in 2019 and is projected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2025, growing at a CAGR of XX% during the period 2019 to 2025.

The report titled Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market is one of the most comprehensive and important additions to QY Researchs archive of market research studies. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the global Cancer Gene Therapy market. The market analysts authoring this report have provided in-depth information on leading growth drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities to offer a complete analysis of the global Cancer Gene Therapy market. Market participants can use the analysis on market dynamics to plan effective growth strategies and prepare for future challenges beforehand. Each trend of the global Cancer Gene Therapy market is carefully analyzed and researched about by the market analysts.

Request Sample Report @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=S&repid=2081748&source=atm

The Essential Content Covered in the Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Report:

In terms of region, this research report covers almost all the major regions across the globe such as North America, Europe, South America, the Middle East, and Africa and the Asia Pacific. Europe and North America regions are anticipated to show an upward growth in the years to come. While Cancer Gene Therapy Market in Asia Pacific regions is likely to show remarkable growth during the forecasted period. Cutting edge technology and innovations are the most important traits of the North America region and thats the reason most of the time the US dominates the global markets. Cancer Gene Therapy Market in South, America region is also expected to grow in near future.

The key players covered in this studyAdaptimmuneBluebird bioCelgeneShanghai Sunway BiotechShenzhen SiBiono GeneTechSynerGene TherapeuticsAltor BioScienceAmgenArgenxBioCancellGlaxoSmithKlineMerckOncoGenex PharmaceuticalsTransgene

Market segment by Type, the product can be split intoOncolytic VirotherapyGene TransferGene-Induced Immunotherapy

Market segment by Application, split intoHospitalsDiagnostics CentersResearch Institutes

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report coversUnited StatesEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndiaCentral & South America

Make An EnquiryAbout This Report @ https://www.researchmoz.com/enquiry.php?type=E&repid=2081748&source=atm

Key questions answered in the report

*What will be the market size in terms of value and volume in the next five years?

*Which segment is currently leading the market?

*In which region will the market find its highest growth?

*Which players will take the lead in the market?

*What are the key drivers and restraints of the markets growth?

We provide detailed product mapping and analysis of various market scenarios. Our analysts are experts in providing in-depth analysis and breakdown of the business of key market leaders. We keep a close eye on recent developments and follow latest company news related to different players operating in the global Cancer Gene Therapy market. This helps us to deeply analyze companies as well as the competitive landscape. Our vendor landscape analysis offers a complete study that will help you to stay on top of the competition.

Table of Contents

1 Cancer Gene Therapy Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Cancer Gene Therapy

1.2 Cancer Gene Therapy Segment by Type

1.2.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Growth Rate Comparison by Type 2020 VS 2026

1.3 Cancer Gene Therapy Segment by Application

1.3.1 Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption Comparison by Application: 2020 VS 2026

1.4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market by Region

1.4.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2020 VS 2026

1.4.2 North America Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.4.3 Europe Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.4.4 China Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.4.5 Japan Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.5 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Growth Prospects

1.5.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.5.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

1.5.3 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Estimates and Forecasts (2015-2026)

2 Market Competition by Manufacturers

2.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)

2.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)

2.3 Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)

2.4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Average Price by Manufacturers (2015-2020)

2.5 Manufacturers Cancer Gene Therapy Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types

2.6 Cancer Gene Therapy Market Competitive Situation and Trends

2.6.1 Cancer Gene Therapy Market Concentration Rate

2.6.2 Global Top 3 and Top 5 Players Market Share by Revenue

2.6.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Production Capacity by Region

4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption by Regions

5 Production, Revenue, Price Trend by Type

5.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Production Market Share by Type (2015-2020)

5.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Revenue Market Share by Type (2015-2020)

5.3 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Price by Type (2015-2020)

5.4 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End

6 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Market Analysis by Application

6.1 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption Market Share by Application (2015-2020)

6.2 Global Cancer Gene Therapy Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2015-2020)

Read More..

You can Buy This Report from Here @ https://www.researchmoz.com/checkout?rep_id=2081748&licType=S&source=atm

Here is the original post:
Cancer Gene Therapy Market Scope Analysis 2019-2025 - Science In Me

Read More...

BioIVT Opens New Blood Donor Center to Support Boston-area Research into COVID-19 Therapies, Vaccines and Diagnostics – Bio-IT World

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

Located on the Tufts University Medford, MA campus, this new donor center will enable delivery of fresh blood, leukopaks and buffy coats for COVID-19, cell and gene therapy research within hours of collection

WESTBURY, NY - Apr 6, 2020 - BioIVT, a leading provider of research models and services for drug and diagnostic development, today announced the opening of its new blood donor center on the Tufts University campus in Medford, MA to support academic and pharmaceutical researchers involved in COVID-19, cell and gene therapy research.

BioIVT wants to play a leading role in supporting COVID-19 research efforts and blood donations are a vital resource for the research and development of new therapies, vaccines, and diagnostics. We have many years experience developing blood products, including blood-derived immune cells for cell and gene therapy research, and we want to make that expertise count, said BioIVT CEO Jeff Gatz. Researchers recognize and appreciate BioIVTs rapid response and commitment to high quality, fresh blood products and this new donor center will allow us to offer those attributes and services to additional US clients.

BioIVTs new Boston blood donor center is its seventh. The company has similar facilities located in California, Tennessee and Pennsylvania to serve US clients and in London, UK for EU-based clients.

While the initial focus at our Boston donor center will be on delivering fresh blood, leukopaks and buffy coats within hours of collection, we plan to add more capabilities and donors over time, said Jeff Widdoss, Vice President of Donor Center Operations at BioIVT.

Leukopaks, which contain concentrated white blood cells, are used to help identify promising new drug candidates, assess toxicity levels, and conduct stem cell and gene therapy research. They are particularly useful for researchers who need to obtain large numbers of leukocytes from a single donor.

BioIVT blood products can be supplied with specific clinical data, such as the donor age, ethnicity, gender, BMI and smoking status. Its leukopaks are also human leukocyte antigen (HLA), FC receptor and cytomegalovirus typed. HLA typing is used to match patients and donors for bone marrow or cord blood transplants. FC receptors play an important role in antibody-dependent immune responses.

COVID-19-related Precautions

Blood donor centers are considered essential businesses and will remain open during the COVID-19 quarantine. BioIVT is taking additional safety measures to protect both blood donors and its staff during this difficult time. It has instituted several social distancing measures, including increasing the space between chairs in the waiting room and between donor beds, and limiting the entrance of non-essential personnel. The screening rooms are disinfected between donors and all areas of the center continue to be cleaned at regular intervals.

As soon as each blood donor signs their informed consent form, their temperature is taken. If they have a fever, their appointment is postponed, and they are referred to their physician. Any donor who develops COVID-19 symptoms after donating blood is required to inform the center immediately.

All BioIVT blood collections are conducted under institutional review board (IRB) oversight and according to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) guidelines.

Those who would like to donate blood at BioIVTs new Boston-area donor center should call 1-833-GO-4-CURE or visit http://www.biospecialty.com to make an appointment.

Further information about the products available from BioIVTs new donor center can be found at https://info.bioivt.com/ma-donor-ctr-req.

About BioIVT

BioIVT is a leading global provider of research models and value-added research services for drug discovery and development. We specialize in control and disease-state biospecimens including human and animal tissues, cell products, blood and other biofluids. Our unmatched portfolio of clinical specimens directly supports precision medicine research and the effort to improve patient outcomes by coupling comprehensive clinical data with donor samples. Our PHASEZERO Research Services team works collaboratively with clients to provide target and biomarker validation, phenotypic assays to characterize novel therapeutics, clinical assay development and in vitro hepatic modeling solutions. And as the premier supplier of hepatic products, including hepatocytes and subcellular fractions, BioIVT enables scientists to better understand the pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism of newly-discovered compounds and their effects on disease processes. By combining our technical expertise, exceptional customer service, and unparalleled access to biological specimens, BioIVT serves the research community as a trusted partner in elevating science. For more information, please visit http://www.bioivt.com or follow the company on Twitter @BioIVT.

Excerpt from:
BioIVT Opens New Blood Donor Center to Support Boston-area Research into COVID-19 Therapies, Vaccines and Diagnostics - Bio-IT World

Read More...

The Hopes and Challenges of a COVID-19 Vaccine – BioSpace

April 11th, 2020 3:54 am

While the world is working to slow the COVID-19 pandemic by social isolation and quarantine, numerous companies globally are working to develop a vaccine against the virus. The most likely timelinesat bestfor a viable vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus causing COVID-19, are 12 to 18 months. And thats if everything goes right.

As a recent article in Bloomberg Businessweek notes, For that to happen in the next year or so, an almost equally implausible set of circumstances has to occur: flawless scientific execution, breakneck trials and a military-style manufacturing mobilization unlike any the pharmaceutical industry has put in place before.

Typically, it takes 10 to 15 years of deliberate and careful work to develop a commercial vaccineand as both the common cold and HIV have demonstrated, sometimes its not possible even then. The infrastructure for the seasonal flu vaccines that come out every year has been in place for decades.

One of the companies that is gaining a lot of attention is Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Moderna. They have a head-start and are using a novel technology to develop their COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-1273, which is already in clinical trials. mRNA-1273 is a mRNA vaccine that encodes for a prefusion stabilized form of the Spike (S) protein. Whats different about the vaccine is that it is almost like a form of gene therapyit codes for the genetic sequence for the spike protein, and when injected into the body, causes the patients own cells to produce the protein (not the virus), which triggers an immune reaction that will prep itself to battle the virus.

The technology is interesting, but unproven. There are no approved RNA therapies. And Moderna has never brought a product to the market before.

One thing thats of note is how early a start Moderna got on the vaccine. On January 11, 2020, Chinese researchers posted the genetic sequence of the coronavirus, well before most of the world was paying any attention. Moderna scientists had been working on a novel vaccine for a different coronavirus disease and jumped on this sequence and began working on a vaccine against it.

Bloomberg writes, By late February, when President Trump was still downplaying the risk of coronavirus, Modernas scientists had already delivered the first batch of candidate vaccines to researchers at the U.S. National institutes of Health. When the coronavirus was starting to explode in the U.S. in mid-March, the first healthy patient received a dose in a small, government-sponsored safety trial.

Moderna may be the leader, but they are not the only company employing this technology. Pfizer and a few others are as well. Pfizer is working with a German company, BioNTech, hoping to get their experimental RNA vaccine into human trials sometime this month.

Johnson & Johnson is using technology it employed for its experimental Zika and Ebola vaccine. Paris-based Sanofi is modifying technology it uses for its flu shots. There are more than two dozen companies working on coronavirus vaccines that are already in early-stage testing.

There is no precedent for the speed at which we are moving, said Clement Lewin, an associate vice president at Sanofi. I cant think of a parallel, in his thirty years of vaccine work.

The RNA vaccine technology, despite the apparent speed with which Moderna, Pfizer and BioNTech are moving, has some risks. Not as much is known about its efficacy. Early-stage data suggests it should be safe, but there are concerns about unwanted immune responses. And all vaccines run a risk of what is called disease enhancement, where the immune system responds in an unusual way, which can cause the illness to be worse.

It's possible that any vaccines just wont be effective, or the side effects will be such that they wont be considered safe for use.

Scale-up is also a major roadblock. As of April 7, there are 1,362,936 confirmed cases of COVID-19 around the globe. But there are another 8 billion possible people who would possibly benefit from a vaccine.

Under a scenario where Modernas vaccine turns out to be effective and safe, no one has experience in commercial production of RNA vaccines, let alone in the type of scale necessary. The company indicates it has the manufacturing capability to produce millions of doses of the vaccine per month at a factory that was already scaling up for a different vaccine. They are apparently also in discussions with possible partners. But millions is a very long way from producing vaccines for billions of peopleor even a few hundred million people.

If a vaccine were to become available in the next year, an optimistic timeline, the first candidates for the drug would be first-line respondersdoctors, nurses, paramedics, as well as infants, toddlers and pregnant women. Thats a figure that exceeds 26 million people in the U.S. alone.

The next round would be essential personnel and children with preexisting conditions, higher-risk patients and people over the age of 65. Once you add all those, just in the U.S., youre talking more than 100 million who would be considered high-priority for a vaccine.

Mark Feinberg, a former Merck & Co. executive in vaccines who now runs the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, told Bloomberg that the real question wasnt just efficacy, but how quickly can you ramp up manufacturing to meet global need.

There arent a lot of drugs in the industry that are filled at these scales, period, said Stephen Hoge, president of Moderna. Even large pharma companies dont usually operate on this kind of scale. No one entity or one company will be able to do it by themselves.

With any luck, social distancing and quarantine will slow the spread of the virus. Perhaps the coming summer months will also decrease its spread, although whether there is a seasonality component to the disease is still unknown. This would give biopharma companies a little more room to develop and distribute vaccines or to determine which drugs are best-suited to preventing or treating the disease.

Meanwhile, biopharma companies worldwide are working desperately to develop solutions.

More here:
The Hopes and Challenges of a COVID-19 Vaccine - BioSpace

Read More...

Wally meets Dawn Astle: England striker’s daughter campaigned for the truth behind her dad’s death – Mirror Online

April 11th, 2020 3:53 am

Not for the squeamish, it was unmissable science in action.

The dissection of a human brain unlocks more secrets about a person's character than we could conceal in a treasure trove of love letters.

Your correspondent was privileged to watch Steve Gentleman, a professor of neuropathology at Imperial College London, decipher the code of neurons, stem cells and blood vessels in one preserved encephalon at the Parkinson's UK Brain Bank.

One day, his research into neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic head injury, based on the donation of human brains, could stop the march of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and other insidious enemies.

Former England striker Jeff Astle donated his brain, in the name of medical science, after his death at the age of 59.

Better late than never, it revealed the concussive effects of heading leather footballs, which became more like boulders when wet, and turned his family's campaign for essential research into the subject from a lit torch into a raging bushfire.

Fifty years ago this month, Astle finished the season as leading scorer in English football's top flight.

His 25 goals for West Brom earned him a place in Sir Alf Ramsey's England squad, not to mention as a prominent voice among the players performing their 1970 World Cup anthem Back Home in tuxedos on Top of the Pops.

The tenacity of his family, led by Astle's daughter Dawn, in pursuit of the truth behind his death has shone a light in some uncomfortable corners for the game.

If the PFA players' union and the FA were slow to wake up to links between heading footballs and neurodegenerative disorders, they are wide awake now.

By dying, and donating his brain for medical research, my dad now speaks for the living, said Dawn.

Before the end, he didn't even know he had been a footballer. Everything that football gave him England caps, the winner in an FA Cup final football took away again.

Even in his prime, he didn't really have many opinions about anything. Normally, he was so easy-going he never got worked up about politics or anything controversial his glass was always half-full.

But years before he fell ill, he watched a programme on TV about organ donation and suddenly he piped up, 'I don't understand why people wouldn't donate parts of their body after they pass away they are no good to you when you are gone.'

He was unusually passionate about it, so we had no hesitation in offering his brain to medical science.

Without that donation, we would never have known that, in the end, his brain looked like the brain of a boxer.

When he died in January 2002 aged 59, Astle's health had already been in manifest decline for four years, his brain damaged by repeated heading of leather footballs.

The coroner's verdict death by industrial disease - immediately rang alarm bells with his family.

We knew my dad couldn't possibly be the only one, said Dawn. He died on my birthday, in my house, choking on my food, and the image haunts me to this day.

But when you go through something so traumatic, it hardens your resolve to find the truth.

It would take 12 years before the family arranged with Dr Willie Stewart, a consultant neuropathologist in Glasgow, to re-examine Astle's brain tissue.

He confirmed their deepest suspicion: Astle had not been suffering from early-onset Alzheimer's but CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), a degenerative condition consistent with punch-drunk boxers.

Dr Stewart told us if he hadn't known my dad was 59, he would have thought the brain belonged to a man of 90 or more, said Dawn.

He re-examined my dad's brain in 2014 on his birthday, May 13th, and it turned out to be be best birthday present we arranged for him because it revealed the truth.

As a family, we now believe passionately in the importance of brain and other organ tissue donation for one reason: In future, it means someone else won't have to do it.

Three of England's 1966 World Cup winning squad Ray Wilson and Martin Peters, no longer with us, and Nobby Stiles, now suffering from advanced dementia - have already been struck down by the curse of neurological disintegration.

Were they all victims of the same heading trauma as Astle?

The circumstantial evidence is stacking up.

Original post:
Wally meets Dawn Astle: England striker's daughter campaigned for the truth behind her dad's death - Mirror Online

Read More...

Studies Show N.Y. Outbreak Originated in Europe – The New York Times

April 11th, 2020 3:53 am

To not have any control over anything, to just be waiting and on the edge of your seat, its mind blowing at this point. Janettes fiance, Michael, is detained on Rikers Island. Hes serving time because he failed to check in with his officer, violating his parole for drug possession. Now Michael, and hundreds like him, are at the center of a public health crisis experts have been warning about for weeks. Two months owed to the city, its not worth somebodys life. Youre giving people a life sentence leaving them there. TV announcers: An inmate who tested positive for Covid-19 died yesterday at Bellevue Hospital. Rikers is one of the largest correctional facilities in the world, and right now, the infection rate there is seven times that of New York City. Is our prison system equipped to handle an outbreak? When the coronavirus seeped into the jails, public officials, public advocates all rushed to address the situation. We will continue to reduce our jail population. Were releasing people who are in jails because they violated parole. When the virus was first identified in New York, there were 5,400 inmates in city jails. To combat the spread of the virus, the Board of Correction recommended the release of 2,000 inmates. Parole violators, people over 50, those medically at risk and inmates serving short sentences. But two weeks later, government officials have released just half. Prisons, jails, are acting as incubators for the virus. Think about the jails as the worlds worst cruise ship. If we get a real situation here, and this thing starts to spread, its going to spread like wildfire, and New York is going to have a problem on their hands. Thousands of employees travel through the citys jails every day, forming a human lifeline to the city. Inmates also come and go. So its particularly urgent to get this under control because its not just about who is in the jails right now, its really about the city. This is Kenneth Albritton. He was being held on Rikers as Covid-19 spread through the city. Its scary in there, thats what I would tell you. When I was in there, you had guys making their own masks with their shirts. They didnt want to breathe in the air with the same people thats in the dorm with them. Kenneth was on parole after serving time for second-degree manslaughter when he was 18. I was brought to Rikers Island on Feb. 5 for a curfew violation. For me reading a paper and watching the news, and Im seeing that theyre saying no more than 10 to a group. But you have 50 guys thats in a sleeping area. Its impossible to tell us to practice social distancing there when theyre being stacked on top of each other. After someone in his dorm tested positive, Kenneth says he was quarantined. But less than 24 hours later, he was released. He was given a MetroCard, but no guidance about how to deal with the potential spread of Covid-19. If they would have tested me on my way out, then I would have felt like, OK, they took the proper steps. When I left the pen to come home, they told us nothing about how we should handle situation. Even though nobody told me nothing, I felt I should quarantine myself. Not much has been considered in terms of what happens to inmates after their release, and once theyre back in the communities and in their homes. When we asked about the pace of releases, the mayors office agreed it was slow, but said they dont have full control of the process. The states Department of Corrections said its working as quickly as possible. My fiance whos on Rikers, we had our son in September and about two weeks after that, he found out that he had a warrant for his arrest. Oh, you got those boogies. I told you that baby likes that camera Oh my goodness. This is a person with nonviolent charges. Its like a real health care disaster. The parolees is like the easiest thing they do. Right. Yeah, they said about 500 or 700 parolees. I just had read it last night. Yes, that he signed off on it. The outbreak at city jails doesnt just pose a threat to inmates. On March 27, Quinsey Simpson became the first New York City corrections officer to die from Covid-19. Correction officers every day, despite harm to themselves and their family, are rolling on this island to do this job. Officer Husamudeen criticizes the citys response, though hes arguing for improving jail conditions not releasing inmates. Thats not the answer to solving this problem. They havent served their time. If they served their time, they wouldnt be on parole. But his opposition is in the minority. While the overall population at Rikers has decreased, theres an unusual consensus from public defenders, prosecutors and corrections officials that the releases arent happening quickly enough. We need to reframe our thinking around public safety right now to accommodate the fact that public safety includes trying to prevent viral spread. My brother whos a New York City schoolteacher contracted the coronavirus. Are you OK? Oh, I love you. Oh, you scared? Whats the matter? Oh, God. Dont get into your head that its going to beat you. Youre going to beat this. OK? OK, I love you. OK, Ill call you in a little while. OK. As a teacher, he had a lot of precautions, and thought he was following everything he was supposed to be doing, and he contracted the coronavirus going into a school. This is why Im so adamant about fighting for Michael to get home. The person standing right next to you can have it and you wouldnt even know it. Across city jails, hundreds of inmates and corrections workers have tested positive, and half of all inmates are now under quarantine. Covid-19 and the pandemic has exposed pretty rapidly sort of all of the weakest places in our social safety nets. And it is no surprise that one of those is the ways that jails put people at risk. I know, love This is just ridiculously scary.

Read the original:
Studies Show N.Y. Outbreak Originated in Europe - The New York Times

Read More...

Searching for an effective Covid-19 treatment: promise and peril – STAT

April 11th, 2020 3:53 am

In response to the most serious global health threat in a century, the worlds biomedical establishment is unleashing an unprecedented response to the Covid-19 pandemic, rapidly increasing resources aimed at finding safe and effective treatments for the disease. But without careful attention to the pitfalls that can befall biomedical research and regulatory decision-making during a time of crisis, a lot can go wrong.

On March 28, the FDA provided emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine a medicine approved for treating malaria for people hospitalized with Covid-19. It also however, told health providers that the optimal dose and duration of treatment were unknown. The authorization did not identify any clinical study on which this approval was based, and while hydroxychloroquine may affect viral replication and might ultimately prove beneficial, its impact on health outcomes among patients with Covid-19 is currently unclear.

Against this potentially worrisome action, the scope of the search for a new treatment to mitigate or cure Covid-19 is breathtaking. One recent listing identified more than 70 candidate molecules, including 15 antivirals, potent suppressants of the human immune system, and high-risk oncology treatments already approved by the FDA to treat other conditions.

advertisement

The National Institutes of Healths ClinicalTrials.gov lists more than 100 clinical investigations focused on Covid-19 from around the world, with sponsors that include medical centers, pharmaceutical companies, and national research institutes. In time, it is likely we will see direct-acting antivirals tailored to the most vulnerable molecular targets on the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

But this extraordinary effort is lacking international coordination, which may yield counterproductive competition among countries with biotechnology industries. The coronavirus does not respect national boundaries; neither can the development of new treatments, which are already being tested in more than 15 countries. As a first step, the biomedical community needs to insist on consistent use of central registries of clinical studies and on early sharing of complete details of both successful and failed studies, and not withhold important scientific evidence as proprietary information.

advertisement

Acting against this effort is a growing industry fueled by fear and panic. Medical history has taught us that when people get sick and scared they will take practically anything. For centuries, worthless and sometimes harmful treatments, ranging from arsenic to swamp root, have been promoted by everyone from charlatans to well-meaning clinicians.

In an emergency situation such as this one, attention will naturally turn to repurposing already available products, which makes good sense. But we need to let scientists do their jobs. In too many past cases, drugs have been widely used off-label or based on a positive response in a narrow laboratory or clinical measure only to have independent analysis later show that the treatments do more harm than good or target the wrong patient population. For example, a family of anti-arrhythmic drugs that was effective in stopping asymptomatic irregular heartbeats was subsequently found to increase the risk of cardiac arrest when given to heart attack survivors.

The biomedical establishment must speak with a clear voice about the need to adequately test new drug treatments for Covid-19 and to subject that evidence to independent evaluation by the FDA.

Other pitfalls await those too ready to embrace a new treatment. One is the power of the placebo effect. Among individuals participating in clinical trials, those unaware they are receiving an inactive placebo can show substantial improvement, sometimes equal to 80% of the apparent treatment effect of the active therapy. The placebo effect has been documented in clinical trials assessing health benefits that range from improvement in subjective psychiatric symptoms to objective laboratory results.

Who has not read media reports about an individuals miraculous recovery at the hands of a caring physician trying an entirely new approach to treatment? Independent investigation of the case confirms the striking improvement was real. But it turns out to be a dramatic example of idiosyncratic recoveries that can be neither explained nor duplicated in other patients.

The coming flood of research from trials now or soon to be underway should lead us toward realistic and objective measures of the two fundamental properties of every therapeutic drug: benefit and harm.

A drug that shows disease activity against SARS-CoV-2 could prove too toxic to give to Covid-19 patients with worsening pneumonia. A claim that a drug reduces viral load could be valid, but its health benefits or harms could depend on when in the cycle of infection it is used. A drug intended for those with mild-to-moderate symptoms but who are otherwise healthy must be of low toxicity because it will be given to many patients who might have otherwise recovered on their own, while it may be more acceptable to offer drugs with more severe toxicities to patients at higher risk of death.

Another fundamental aspect of all drug testing is encouraging when it comes to Covid-19 research. As the first antibiotics for pneumonia taught us in the 1930s, a dramatically effective treatment for an acute illness can be convincingly demonstrated in a small number of patients observed over a few weeks time. The chances of discovering and documenting such a treatment grow if we also greatly increase the number of patients enrolled in clinical studies.

In the 1980s, during the HIV epidemic, patient advocacy groups not only helped shape the way clinical trials of the disease were conducted but served as a strong force for recruiting patients into trials of investigational drugs. A broad network of trial participants helped accelerate testing of drugs in the pipeline.

In the case of pediatric cancer, a collaborative professional network was established decades ago to ensure that all patients are enrolled in clinical trials at the time of initial diagnosis. These patients then get top-quality care and generate data to help future patients.

Supported by these forces, it is not surprising that both HIV and pediatric cancer have seen remarkable advances in care over the last 30 years.

It is a false choice to think that we can either have expeditious treatment options for SARS-CoV-2 or we can have rigorous testing of them. We can have both. Achieving that goal, however, will require avoiding missteps such as widely promoting unproven products so fearful people begin using them in inconsistent ways outside of the research enterprise. Instead, we will need international coordination of scientific goals, transparency of results, comprehensive participation in clinical research, and trials that evaluate meaningful outcomes. Doing that can ensure that any treatments that are developed do, in fact, benefit the patients who receive them.

G. Caleb Alexander, M.D., is a professor of epidemiology and medicine at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Aaron S. Kesselheim, M.D., is a professor of medicine at Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Thomas J. Moore is a lecturer at George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health.

See original here:
Searching for an effective Covid-19 treatment: promise and peril - STAT

Read More...

Germline mutation of MDM4, a major p53 regulator, in a familial syndrome of defective telomere maintenance – Science Advances

April 11th, 2020 3:53 am

Abstract

Dyskeratosis congenita is a cancer-prone inherited bone marrow failure syndrome caused by telomere dysfunction. A mouse model recently suggested that p53 regulates telomere metabolism, but the clinical relevance of this finding remained uncertain. Here, a germline missense mutation of MDM4, a negative regulator of p53, was found in a family with features suggestive of dyskeratosis congenita, e.g., bone marrow hypocellularity, short telomeres, tongue squamous cell carcinoma, and acute myeloid leukemia. Using a mouse model, we show that this mutation (p.T454M) leads to increased p53 activity, decreased telomere length, and bone marrow failure. Variations in p53 activity markedly altered the phenotype of Mdm4 mutant mice, suggesting an explanation for the variable expressivity of disease symptoms in the family. Our data indicate that a germline activation of the p53 pathway may cause telomere dysfunction and point to polymorphisms affecting this pathway as potential genetic modifiers of telomere biology and bone marrow function.

TP53 is the gene most frequently mutated in human tumors (1), and germ lineinactivating p53 mutations cause the Li-Fraumeni syndrome of cancer predisposition (2). In addition, accelerated tumorigenesis has been associated with polymorphisms increasing the expression of MDM2 or MDM4, the essential p53 inhibitors (3, 4). Alterations of the p53/MDM2/MDM4 regulatory node are, thus, mainly known to promote cancer. Unexpectedly, however, we recently found that mice expressing p5331, a hyperactive mutant p53 lacking its C terminus, recapitulated the complete phenotype of patients with dyskeratosis congenita (DC) (5).

DC is a telomere biology disorder characterized by the mucocutaneous triad of abnormal skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy, and oral leukoplakia; patients are also at very high risk of bone marrow failure, pulmonary fibrosis, and cancer, especially head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (6). Patients with DC are known to exhibit disease diversity in terms of age of onset, symptoms, and severity due to the mode of inheritance and causative gene (7, 8). DC is caused by germline mutations in genes encoding key components of telomere biology: the telomerase holoenzyme (DKC1, TERC, TERT, NOP10, and NHP2), the shelterin telomere protection complex (ACD, TINF2, and POT1), telomere capping proteins (CTC1 and STN1), and other proteins interacting with these cellular processes (RTEL1, NAF1, WRAP53, and PARN) (6). Twenty to 30% of affected individuals remain unexplained at the molecular level.

Our finding that p5331/31 mice were remarkable models of DC was initially unexpected for two reasons. First, an increased p53 activity was not expected to cause telomere dysfunction, given the well-accepted notion that p53 acts as the guardian of the genome. However, p53 is now known to down-regulate the expression of many genes involved in genome maintenance (5, 9, 10), and this might actually contribute to its toolkit to prevent tumor formation (11). Second, telomere biology diseases are usually difficult to model in mice because of differences in telomere length and telomerase expression between mice and humans. Mice that lack telomerase exhibited short telomeres only after three or four generations (G3/G4) of intracrosses (12, 13). However, mice with a telomerase haploinsufficiency and a deficient shelterin complex exhibited telomere dysfunction and DC features in a single generation (G1) (14). Because DC features were observed in G1 p5331/31 mice, we supposed that p53 might exert pleiotropic effects on telomere maintenance. Consistent with this, we found that murine p53 down-regulates several genes implicated in telomere biology (5, 9). Because some of these genes were also down-regulated by p53 in human cells (5, 9), our data suggested that an activating p53 mutation might cause features of DC in humans. However, this conclusion remained speculative in the absence of any clinical evidence.

Here, we report the identification of a germline missense mutation in MDM4, encoding an essential and specific negative regulator of p53, in a family presenting some DC-like phenotypic traits. We used a mouse model to demonstrate that this mutation leads to p53 activation, short telomeres, and bone marrow failure. Together, our results provide compelling evidence that a germline mutation affecting a specific p53 regulator may cause DC-like features in both humans and mice.

Family NCI-226 first enrolled in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) cohort in 2008 (Fig. 1A and table S1). At the time, the proband (226-1) was 17 years of age and had a history of neutropenia, bone marrow hypocellularity, vague gastrointestinal symptoms, and chronic pain. His mother (226-4) also had intermittent neutropenia and a hypocellular bone marrow. Notably, his maternal aunt (226-7) had a history of melanoma and died at age 52 because of AML. The maternal aunts daughter (probands cousin, 226-8) had HNSCC at age 27 years, intermittent neutropenia, and bone marrow hypocellularity, while her son (probands cousin, 226-9) was diagnosed with metastatic HNSCC at 42 years of age. The probands father (226-3) was healthy with the exception of hemochromatosis. An IBMFS was suspected on the basis of the family history of cancer and neutropenia. Chromosome breakage for Fanconi anemia was normal, while lymphocyte telomeres were between the 1st and 10th percentiles in the proband and maternal cousin (226-8) (Fig. 1, B and C). The proband was tested for mutations in known DC-causing genes, and a TERT variant (p.W203S) was identified. Unexpectedly, however, the variant was found to be inherited from his father. TERT p.W203S is not present in gnomAD, but it is predicted to be tolerated by MetaSVM (15).

(A) Pedigree of family NCI-226. Arrow indicates proband. Cancer histories include oral squamous cell carcinoma for 226-8 at age 27 years and for 226-9 at age 42 years, and melanoma at 51 years and AML at 52 years for 226-7 (see table S1 for further details). 226-5 had lung cancer at age 69 years. 226-6 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma at age 91 years. In addition, four siblings of 226-6 had cancer: one with breast, two with lung, and one with ovary or uterus (not specified). Sequencing of 226-5, 226-6, 226-7, and 226-9 was not possible because of lack of available DNA. (B and C) Lymphocyte telomere lengths (TL) of study participants. Total lymphocyte telomere lengths are shown and were measured by flow cytometry with in situ hybridization. (B) Graphical depiction of telomere length in relation to age. Four individuals had telomeres measured twice. Legend is in (C). Percentiles (%ile) are based on 400 healthy individuals (50). (C) Age at measurement(s) and telomere length in kilobases. (D) Sequence of the MDM4 RING domain (residues 436 to 490) with secondary structure residues indicated (black boxes). The P-loop motif is highlighted in gray, and the mutated residue in red. (E) The mutant RING domain retains ATP-binding capacity. Wild-type (WT) and mutant (TM) glutathione S-transferase (GST)RING proteins, or GST alone, were incubated with 10 nM ATP and 5 Ci ATP-32P for 10 min at room temperature, filtered through nitrocellulose, and counted by liquid scintillation CPM, counts per minute. Results from two independent experiments. (F) The mutant MDM4 RING domain has an altered capacity to dimerize with the MDM2 RING. Two-hybrid assays were carried out as described (47). -LW, minus leucine and tryptophan; -LWHA, minus leucine, tryptophan, histidine and adenine; OD, optical density. Growth on the -LWHA medium indicates protein interaction, readily observed between MDM2 (M2-BD) and WT MDM4 (M4-AD WT) but faintly visible between MDM2 and MDM4T454M (M4-AD TM). (G) Impact of the mutation in transfected human cells. U2OS cells were transfected with an empty vector (EV) or an expression plasmid encoding a Myc-tagged MDM4 (WT or T454M) protein and then treated or not with cycloheximide (CHX) to inhibit protein synthesis, and protein extracts were immunoblotted with antibodies against Myc, p21, or actin. Bands were normalized to actin, and a value of 1 was assigned to cells transfected with the WT MDM4 expression plasmid (for Myc) or with the empty vector (for p21).

Since the TERT variant did not track with disease inheritance, whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to search for a causal gene. The whole-exome data were filtered by maternal autosomal inheritance and revealed three genes with heterozygous missense mutations potentially deleterious according to bioinformatics predictions: MDM4, KRT76, and REM1 (table S2). Given the limited knowledge of the function of KRT76 and REM1, and our prior knowledge of a DC-like phenotype in p5331/31 mice, we chose to focus on the mutation affecting MDM4 because it encodes a major negative regulator of p53. Although the T454M mutation does not affect the p53 interaction domain of MDM4, it might affect p53 regulation because it affects the MDM4 RING domain: Residue 454 is both part of a P-loop motif thought to confer adenosine triphosphate (ATP)binding capacity (16) and part of a strand important for MDM2-MDM4 heterodimerization (Fig. 1D) (17). The mutant RING domain had fully retained its capacity to bind ATP specifically (Fig. 1E and fig. S1A) but exhibited an altered capacity to interact with the MDM2 RING domain in a yeast two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1F). We next used transfection experiments to evaluate the consequences of this mutation on the full-length protein in human cells. We transfected U2OS cellsknown to have a functional but attenuated p53 pathway due to MDM2 overexpression (18)with either an empty vector or an expression plasmid encoding a Myc-tagged MDM4WT or MDM4T454M protein. Compared with cells transfected with the empty vector, cells transfected with a MDM4WT or a MDM4T454M expression plasmid exhibited decreased p21 levels, indicating MDM4-mediated p53 inhibition in both cases (Fig. 1G). However, the decrease in p21 levels was less pronounced in cells expressing MDM4T454M than in cells expressing MDM4WT (Fig. 1G) despite similar transfection efficiencies (fig. S1B). The lower expression levels of the MDM4T454M protein likely contributed to its decreased capacity to inhibit p53 (Fig. 1G). In this experimental setting, the treatment with cycloheximide did not reveal any significant difference in stability between the mutant and wild-type (WT) MDM4 proteins (Fig. 1G and quantification in fig. S1C), raising the possibility that the observed lower MDM4T454M protein levels might result from differences in mRNA translation efficiency. Together, these preliminary results argued for an impact of the mutation on MDM4 function, leading to p53 activation.

The MDM4 RING domain is remarkably conserved throughout evolution, e.g., with 91% identity between the RING domains of human MDM4 and mouse Mdm4 (19). Thus, we decided to create a mouse model to precisely evaluate the physiological impact of the human mutation. We used homologous recombination in embryonic stem (ES) cells to target the p.T454M mutation at the Mdm4 locus (Fig. 2A). Targeted recombinants were identified by long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Fig. 2B), confirmed by DNA sequencing (Fig. 2C), and the structure of the recombinant allele was further analyzed by Southern blots with probes located 5 and 3 of the targeted mutation (Fig. 2D). Recombinant ES clones were then microinjected into blastocysts to generate chimeric mice, and chimeras were mated with PGK-Cre mice to excise the Neo gene. PCR was used to verify transmission through the germ line of the Mdm4T454M (noted below Mdm4TM) mutation and to genotype the mouse colony and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Fig. 2E). We first isolated RNAs from Mdm4TM/TM MEFs and sequenced the entire Mdm4 coding sequence: The Mdm4TM sequence was identical to the WT Mdm4 sequence except for the introduced missense mutation (not shown). Furthermore, like its human counterpart, the Mdm4 gene encodes two major transcripts: Mdm4-FL, encoding the full-length oncoprotein that inhibits p53, and Mdm4-S, encoding a shorter, extremely unstable protein (20, 21). We observed, in unstressed cells as well as in cells treated with Nutlin [a molecule that activates p53 by preventing Mdm2-p53 interactions (22) without altering Mdm4-p53 interactions (23, 24)], that the Mdm4TM mutation affected neither Mdm4-FL nor Mdm4-S mRNA levels (Fig. 2F). In Western blots, however, Mdm4-FL was the only detectable isoform, and it was expressed at lower levels in the mutant MEFs (Fig. 2G).

(A) Targeting strategy. Homologous recombination in ES cells was used to target the T454M mutation at the Mdm4 locus. For the Mdm4 WT allele, exons 9 to 11 are shown [black boxes, coding sequences; white box, 3 untranslated region (3UTR)] and Bam HI (BH) restriction sites. Above, the targeting construct contains the following: (i) a 2.9-kb-long 5 homology region encompassing exon 10, intron 10, and exon 11 sequences upstream the mutation; (ii) the mutation (asterisk) within exon 11; (iii) a 2.6-kb-long fragment encompassing the 3 end of the gene and sequences immediately downstream; (iv) a neomycin selection gene (Neo) flanked by loxP sequences (gray arrowheads) and an additional BH site; (v) a 2.1-kb-long 3 homology region containing sequences downstream Mdm4; and (vi) the Diphtheria toxin a gene (DTA) for targeting enrichment. (B to D) screening of G418-resistant ES clones as described in (A), with asterisks (*) indicating positive recombinants: (B) PCR with primers a and b; (C) sequencing after PCR with primers c and d: the sequence for codons 452 to 456 demonstrates heterozygosity at codon 454; (D) Southern blot of Bam HIdigested DNA with the 5 (left) or 3 (right) probe. (E) Examples of fibroblast genotyping by PCR with primers e and f. (F) The Mdm4T454M mutation does not alter Mdm4 mRNA levels. Mdm4-FL (left) and Mdm4-S (right) mRNAs were extracted from WT and Mdm4TM/TM MEFs before or after treatment for 24 hours with 10 M Nutlin, quantified using real-time PCR, and normalized to control mRNAs, and then the value in Nutlin-treated WT MEFs was assigned a value of 1. Results from five independent experiments and >4 MEFs per genotype. ns, not significant in a Students t test. (G) Decreased Mdm4 protein levels in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs. Protein extracts, prepared from MEFs treated as in (F), were immunoblotted with antibodies against Mdm4 or actin. Bands were normalized to actin, and then the values in Nutlin-treated WT cells were assigned a value of 1. p53P/P Mdm4E6/E6 MEFs do not express a full-length Mdm4 protein (20): They were loaded to unambiguously identify the Mdm4(-FL) band in the other lanes.

Mdm4TM/TM MEFs contained higher mRNA levels for the p53 targets p21(Cdkn1a) and Mdm2, indicating increased p53 activity (Fig. 3A). Consistent with this, Mdm4TM/TM MEFs exhibited increased p21 and Mdm2 protein levels (Fig. 3B and fig. S2). Moreover, Mdm4TM/TM MEFs prematurely ceased to proliferate when submitted to a 3T3 protocol (Fig. 3C), which also suggests an increased p53 activity. The mean telomere length was decreased by 11% in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs, and a subset of very short telomeres was observed in these cells, hence demonstrating a direct link between the Mdm4TM mutation, p53 activation, and altered telomere biology (Fig. 3D). In p5331/31 MEFs, subtle but significant decreases in expression were previously observed for several genes involved in telomere biology, and in particular, small variations in Rtel1 gene expression were found to have marked effects on the survival of p5331/31 mice (5, 9). Similarly, Mdm4TM/TM MEFs exhibited subtle but significant decreases in expression for Rtel1 and several other genes contributing to telomere biology (Fig. 3E). We previously showed that p53 activation correlates with an increased binding of the E2F4 repressor at the Rtel1 promoter (9). Hence, the decreased Rtel1 mRNA levels in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs most likely resulted from increased p53 signaling. Consistent with this, a further increase in p53 activity, induced by Nutlin, led to further decreases in Rtel1 mRNA and protein levels, in both WT and Mdm4TM/TM cells (fig. S3A). Recently, in apparent contradiction with our finding that p53 activation can cause telomere shortening (5), p53 was proposed to prevent telomere DNA degradation by inducing subtelomeric transcripts, including telomere repeat-containing RNA (TERRA) (25, 26), which suggested a complex, possibly context-dependent impact of p53 on telomeres (27). This led us to compare TERRA transcripts in WT and Mdm4TM/TM cells. Consistent with an earlier report (26), p53 activation led to increased TERRA at the mouse Xq subtelomeric region in WT cells (fig. S3B). However, Mdm4TM/TM cells failed to induce TERRA in response to stress (fig. S3B). Together, our data suggest that the telomere shortening observed in Mdm4TM/TM cells results from a p53-dependent decrease in expression of several telomere-related genes and, notably, Rtel1, a gene mutated in several families with DC (6). In addition, although evidence that altered TERRA levels can cause DC is currently lacking, we cannot exclude that an altered regulation of TERRA expression might contribute to telomere defects in Mdm4TM/TM cells.

(A) Quantification of p21 and Mdm2 mRNAs extracted from WT, Mdm4+/TM, and Mdm4TM/TM MEFs, treated or not for 24 hours with 10 M Nutlin. mRNA levels were quantified using real-time PCR and normalized to control mRNAs, and then the value in Nutlin-treated WT MEFs was assigned a value of 1. Results from 10 independent experiments. (B) Protein extracts, prepared from p53/, WT, and Mdm4TM/TM MEFs treated as in (A), were immunoblotted with antibodies against Mdm2, Mdm4, p53, p21, or actin. Bands were normalized to actin, and then the values in Nutlin-treated WT MEFs were assigned a value of 1. (C) Proliferation of MEFs in a 3T3 protocol. Each point is the average value of three independent MEFs. (D) Decreased telomere length in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs, as measured by quantitative FISH with a telomeric probe. Results from two MEFs per genotype, and 68 to 75 metaphases per MEF [means + 95% confidence interval (CI) are shown in yellow]. a.u., arbitrary units. (E) Telomere-related genes down-regulated in Mdm4TM/TM MEFs. mRNAs were extracted from unstressed WT and Mdm4TM//TM MEFs, quantified using real-time PCR, and normalized to control mRNAs, and the value in WT MEFs was assigned a value of 1. Results from >3 independent experiments and two MEFs per genotype. In relevant panels: P = 0.08, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 by Students t (A, C at passage 7, and E) or Mann-Whitney (D) statistical tests.

Mdm4TM/TM mice were born in Mendelian proportions from Mdm4+/TM intercrosses (Fig. 4A) but were smaller than their littermates and died within 0 to 30 min after birth, with signs of severe respiratory distress (Fig. 4, B and C). Consistent with this, Mdm4TM/TM pups at postnatal day 0 (P0) appeared hypoxic (Fig. 4C), and their lungs were very small and dysfunctional (Fig. 4D). Thus, Mdm4TM/TM pups most likely died from neonatal respiratory failure. Tissues from Mdm4TM/TM pups exhibited increased p21 mRNA levels, suggesting an increase in p53 activity in these animals (fig. S4). We next used flowFISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) with a telomere-specific probe to evaluate the impact of the mutation on telomere length in vivo. Lung cells from Mdm4TM/TM pups (and control G3 Terc/ mice) exhibited a 25% decrease in mean telomere length compared with cells from WT or Mdm4+/TM littermates, indicating altered telomere biology in G1 homozygous mutants (Fig. 4E). Notably, p53 loss or haploinsufficiency rescued the perinatal lethality of Mdm4TM/TM pups, illustrating that the premature death of Mdm4TM/TM mice likely resulted from increased p53 activity (Fig. 4F). However, p53/ and Mdm4TM/TM p53/ mice exhibited similar survival curves, with a fraction of the mice (respectively 4 of 12 and 1 of 6) succumbing to thymic lymphoma in less than 180 days. In contrast, after 180 days, all the p53+/ mice remained alive, whereas most Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice had died. Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice were smaller than their littermates (Fig. 4G) and exhibited hyperpigmentation of the footpads (Fig. 4H), and 120-day-old Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice exhibited abnormal hemograms (Fig. 4I). Furthermore, the Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice that died 60 to 160 days after birth exhibited bone marrow hypocellularity (Fig. 4J), indicating bone marrow failure as the likely cause for their premature death.

(A) Mendelian distribution of the offspring from 8 Mdm4+/TM intercrosses. (B) Mdm4TM/TM mice die at birth. Cohort sizes are in parentheses. (C) Mdm4TM/TM neonates are smaller than their littermates and appear hypoxic. (D) Lungs from Mdm4TM/TM P0 pups are hypoplastic and sink in phosphate-buffered saline owing to a lack of air inflation. (E) Flow-FISH analysis of P0 lung cells with a telomere-specific peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe. Top: Representative results from a WT, a Mdm4+/TM, a Mdm4TM/TM, and a G3 Terc/ mouse are shown. Right: Green fluorescence (fluo.) with black histograms for cells without the probe (measuring cellular autofluorescence) and green histograms for cells with the probe. The shift in fluorescence intensity is smaller in Mdm4TM/TM and Terc/ cells (c or d < a or b), indicating reduced telomere length. Left: Propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence histograms are superposed for cells with or without the probe. Below: Statistical analysis of green fluorescence shifts (see Materials and Methods). Means + 95% CI are shown; data are from two to three mice and >3800 cells per genotype. (F) Impact of decreased p53 activity on Mdm4TM/TM animals. Cohort sizes are in parentheses. (G) Examples of littermates with indicated genotypes. (H) Hind legs of mice with indicated genotypes. (I) Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice exhibit abnormal hemograms. Counts for white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), and platelets (PLT) for age-matched (120 days old) animals are shown. (J) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of sternum sections from WT and Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice. In relevant panels: ns, not significant; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox (B and F), Students t (C, D, G, and I), or Mann-Whitney (E) statistical tests. Photo credits: E.T. and R.D., Institut Curie (C, G, and H); R.D., Institut Curie (D).

Although Mdm4TM/TM MEFs and mice were useful to demonstrate that the Mdm4T454M mutation leads to p53 activation and short telomeres, a detailed analysis of Mdm4+/TM mice appeared more relevant to model the NCI-226 family, in which all affected relatives were heterozygous carriers of the MDM4T454M mutation. Unlike Mdm4TM/TM mice, most Mdm4+/TM animals remained alive 6 months after birth and had no apparent phenotype, similarly to WT mice (Fig. 5A). This was consistent with our analyses in fibroblasts because Mdm4+/TM MEFs behaved like WT cells in a 3T3 proliferation assay (Fig. 3C). However, p53 target genes appeared to be transactivated slightly more efficiently in Mdm4+/TM than in WT cells (Fig. 3A), and 30% of Mdm4+/TM mice exhibited a slight hyperpigmentation of the footpads, suggesting a subtle increase in p53 activity (Fig. 5B). We reasoned that a further, subtle increase in p53 activity might affect the survival of Mdm4+/TM mice. We tested this hypothesis by mating Mdm4+/TM animals with p53+/31 mice. p53+/31 mice were previously found to exhibit a slight increase in p53 activity and to remain alive for over a year (5). Notably, unlike Mdm4+/TM or p53+/31 heterozygous mice, Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 compound heterozygotes died in less than 3 months (Fig. 5A) and exhibited many features associated with strong p53 activation. Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibited intense skin hyperpigmentation (Fig. 5C), were much smaller than their littermates (Fig. 5D), and exhibited heart hypertrophy (Fig. 5E) and thymic hypoplasia (Fig. 5F) and the males had testicular hypoplasia (Fig. 5G). Bone marrow failure was the likely cause for the premature death of Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice, as indicated by abnormal hemograms of 18-day-old (P18) compound heterozygotes (Fig. 5H) and bone marrow hypocellularity in the sternum sections of moribund Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 animals (Fig. 5I). We next used flow-FISH to analyze telomere length in the bone marrow cells of P18 WT, Mdm4+/TM, p53+/31, and Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice. We found no significant difference between telomere lengths in cells from five WT and three Mdm4+/TM mice with normal skin pigmentation, whereas cells from two Mdm4+/TM mice with increased skin pigmentation (or from p53+/31 mice) exhibited marginal (5 to 7%) decreases in mean telomere length. Notably, in G1 Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 cells, the average telomere length was decreased by 34% (Fig. 5J). Together, these results demonstrate that Mdm4+/TM mice are hypersensitive to subtle increases in p53 activity. Consistent with this, Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 MEFs also exhibited increased p53 signaling and accelerated proliferation arrest in a 3T3 protocol (fig. S5). In sum, the comparison between Mdm4TM/TM and Mdm4TM/TM p53+/ mice, or between Mdm4+/TM and Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 animals, indicated that subtle variations in p53 signaling had marked effects on the phenotypic consequences of the Mdm4T454M mutation (table S3).

(A) Impact of increased p53 activity on Mdm4+/TM animals. Cohort sizes are in parentheses. (B) Footpads from Mdm4+/TM mice appear normal (top) or exhibit a subtle increase in pigmentation (bottom). (C) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibit strong skin hyperpigmentation. (D) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice are smaller than age-matched WT mice. (E to G) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibit heart hypertrophy (E) as well as thymic (F) and testicular (G) hypoplasia. (H) Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mice exhibit abnormal hemograms. Counts for white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets for five age-matched (P18) animals per genotype are shown. (I) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of sternum sections from mice of the indicated genotypes. (J) Flow-FISH analysis of P18 bone marrow cells with a telomere-specific PNA probe. Top: Representative results for a WT, a Mdm4+/TM with normal skin pigmentation (nsp), a Mdm4+/TM with increased footpad skin pigmentation (isp), a p53+/31, and a Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 mouse are shown; black histograms, cells without the probe; green histograms, cells with the probe. The smallest shift in fluorescence intensity (e) was observed with Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 cells. Bottom: Statistical analysis of green fluorescence shifts. Means + 95% CI are shown; data are from >1500 cells per genotype. In relevant panels: ns, not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001 by Mantel-Cox (A), Students t (D and E to H), or Mann-Whitney (J) statistical tests. Photo credits: R.D. and P.L., Institut Curie (B); E.T. and R.D., Institut Curie (C and D).

The carriers of the MDM4T454M mutation exhibited considerable heterogeneity in their phenotypes (Fig. 1 and table S1). The data from our mouse model suggested that variations in p53 activity might account for the variable expressivity and penetrance of clinical features among the NCI-226 MDM4+/T454M relatives. Hence, we analyzed nine known common polymorphisms reported to affect p53 activity and tumorigenesis (four at the TP53 locus, two at the MDM2 locus, and three at the MDM4 locus) (3,4,2832). Among the four MDM4+/T454M relatives, the proband (NCI-226-1) is more difficult to interpret because the potential contribution of the TERT p.W203S variant to his phenotype cannot be ruled out (even though it appears unlikely according to in silico predictions). The MDM4 allele encoding the mutant protein (p.T454M) appears associated with the C allele of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4245739, the G allele of SNP rs11801299, and the G allele of SNP rs1380576 (Fig. 6A). These three MDM4 variant alleles are associated with increased p53 activity (4,32) and might, thus, synergize with the MDM4T454M mutation in this family.

(A) Genotyping of polymorphisms that may affect the p53 pathway. The SNPs rs1800371 and rs1042522 modify the p53 protein sequence (28,29), whereas rs17878362 and rs17880560 are singlets (A1) or doublets (A2) of G-rich sequences in noncoding regions of TP53 that affect p53 expression (30). SNPs rs117039649 and rs2279744, in the MDM2 promoter, affect MDM2 mRNA levels (3,31). Three SNPs are at the MDM4 locus: rs4245739 in the 3UTR region affects MDM4 protein levels (4), whereas rs11801299 and rs1380576 were associated with an increased risk of developing retinoblastoma (32), a cancer type with frequent MDM4 alterations (51). Polymorphisms that differ among family members are in bold, with the allele (or haplotype) associated with increased p53 activity in green (because it may synergize with the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation). Alleles (or haplotypes) for which there is evidence of decreased p53 activity, or for which the effect is uncertain, are highlighted in red or blue, respectively. Please note that the clinical effects of the TP53 rs1042522 SNP have recently been contested (33), so that all alleles for this SNP were labeled in blue. MAF, minor allele frequency reported for all gnomAD populations combined. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org (52). (B) Comparative analysis of primary fibroblasts from family members 226-4 and 226-8. p21 and RTEL1 mRNAs, extracted from cells from relatives NCI 226-4 and NCI 226-8 or two unrelated patients with DC carrying a TINF2 or a TERT mutation, were quantified using real-time PCR, normalized to control mRNAs, and then expressed relative to the mean values in TINF2 and TERT mutant cells. ns, not significant, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 in a Students t test.

The probands affected cousin (226-8) exhibited a very early onset of disease, with lymphocyte telomere length within or below the first percentile of age-matched control participants and tongue squamous cell carcinoma at age 27 (Fig. 1 and table S1). The WT MDM4 allele of 226-8 carried the rs4245739 C, the rs11801299 G, and the rs1380576 G variants associated with increased p53 activity. This suggests a potential disease-modifying effect of these MDM4 SNPs. In contrast, the probands mother (226-4) was much less severely affected, with telomere length between the 10th and 50th percentiles (Fig. 1). Although we cannot rule out that disease anticipation might contribute to her milder phenotype, note that her WT MDM4 allele carried variants that might correlate with decreased p53 activity and could antagonize the MDM4T454M mutation (rs4245739 A, rs11801299 A, and rs1380576 C; Fig. 6A). Family members 226-4 and 226-8 shared the same genotypes for all the other tested variants, except for TP53 rs1042522, a SNP first reported to affect apoptotic or cell cycle arrest responses (28), but with a clinical effect that now appears controversial (33). The probands sister (226-2), with a B cell deficiency and telomere lengths around the 10th percentile, also appeared less affected than 226-8. All the tested variants at the MDM2 and MDM4 loci were identical between 226-2 and 226-8. However, unlike 226-8, 226-2 exhibited a TP53 allele with an A1A1 haplotype for variants rs17878362 and rs17880560 that might decrease p53 activity (30) and antagonize the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation (Fig. 6A).

We had primary fibroblasts available for two of these family members, 226-4 and 226-8, allowing us to directly assess the functional effect of the MDM4T454M variant in these cells. These fibroblasts were grown in parallel with primary fibroblasts from patients with DC carrying either a TINF2K280E mutation or a TERTP704S mutation, and mRNA levels for p21 and RTEL1 were quantified. In agreement with the notion that a MDM4T454M heterozygous mutation activates p53 signaling in NCI-226 family members, fibroblasts from both 226-4 and 226-8 exhibited increased p21 mRNA levels compared with TINF2 or TERT mutant cells (Fig. 6B). However, cells from 226-4 only exhibited a 2-fold increase in p21 levels, whereas a 12-fold increase was observed for cells from 226-8, consistent with the notion that SNPs affecting the p53 pathway might counteract (for 226-4) or strengthen (for 226-8) the effect of the MDM4T454M mutation. Furthermore, we previously showed that RTEL1 mRNA levels are down-regulated upon p53 activation in human cells (5). RTEL1 mRNA levels appeared normal in cells from 226-4 but were markedly decreased in cells from 226-8, raising the possibility that a threshold in p53 activation might be required to affect RTEL1 expression (Fig. 6B).

Although MDM4 is primarily known for its clinical relevance in cancer biology, our study shows that a germline missense MDM4 mutation may cause features suggestive of DC. In humans, the MDM4 (p.T454M) mutation was identified in this family with neutropenia, bone marrow hypocellularity, early-onset tongue SCC, AML, and telomeres between the 1st and 10th percentiles in the younger generation. In mice, the same Mdm4 mutation notably correlated with increased p53 activity, short telomeres, and bone marrow failure. In both human transfected cells and MEFs, the mutant protein was expressed at lower levels than its WT counterpart, likely contributing to increased p53 activity. Together, these results demonstrate the importance of the MDM4/p53 regulatory axis on telomere biology and DC-like features in both species. Notably, p5331/31 mice were previously found to phenocopy DC (5), but whether this finding was relevant to human disease had remained controversial. When a mutation in PARN was found to cause DC (34), it first appeared consistent with the p5331 mouse model because PARN, the polyadenylate-specific ribonuclease, had been proposed to regulate p53 mRNA stability (35). However, whether PARN regulates the stability of mRNAs is now contested (36). Rather, PARN would regulate the levels of over 200 microRNAs, of which only a few might repress p53 mRNA translation (37). Furthermore, PARN regulates TERC, the telomerase RNA component (38), and TERC overexpression increased telomere length in PARN-deficient cells (39). Thus, whether a germline mutation that specifically activates p53 can cause DC-like features remained to be demonstrated in humans, and our report provides compelling evidence for this, because unlike PARN, MDM4 is a very specific regulator of p53.

A germline antiterminating MDM2 mutation was recently identified in a patient with a Werner-like syndrome of premature aging. Although multiple mechanisms might contribute to the clinical features in that report, a premature cellular senescence resulting from p53 hyperactivation was proposed to play a major role in his segmental progeroid phenotype (40). In that regard, our finding that increased p53 activity correlates with short telomeres appears relevant because telomere attrition is a primary hallmark of aging, well known to trigger cellular senescence (41). Furthermore, germline TP53 frameshift mutations were recently reported in two patients diagnosed with pure red blood cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia, resembling but not entirely consistent with Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) (42). In addition to the pure red cell aplasia diagnostic of DBA, those patients were found to exhibit relatively short telomeres (although not as short as telomeres from patients with DC), which may also seem consistent with our results. Our finding of an MDM4 missense mutation in a DC-like family, together with recent reports linking an antiterminating MDM2 mutation to a Werner-like phenotype and TP53 frameshift mutations to DBA-like features, indicates that the clinical impact of germline mutations affecting the p53/MDM2/MDM4 regulatory network is just emerging. An inherited hyperactivation of the p53 pathwayvia a germline TP53, MDM2, or MDM4 mutationmay thus cause either DBA, Werner-like, or DC-like features, but additional work will be required to determine whether mutations in any of these three genes can cause any of these three syndromes. Likewise, several mouse models have implicated p53 deregulation in features of other developmental syndromes including the CHARGE, Treacher-Collins, Waardenburg, or DiGeorge syndrome (43), and it will be important to know whether germline mutations in TP53, MDM2, or MDM4 may cause these additional syndromes in humans.

Heterozygous Mdm4+/TM mice appeared normal but were hypersensitive to variations in p53 activity, and, perhaps most notably, Mdm4+/TM p53+/31 compound heterozygous mice rapidly died from bone marrow failure. Thus, the p5331 mutation acted as a strong genetic modifier of the Mdm4TM mutation. It is tempting to speculate that similarly, among the NCI-226 family members heterozygous for the MDM4T454M allele, differences in the severity of phenotypic traits (e.g., lymphocyte telomere length and bone marrow cellularity) may result, in part, from modifiers affecting the p53 pathway and synergize or antagonize with the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation. To search for potentially relevant modifiers, we looked at nine polymorphisms at the TP53, MDM2, and MDM4 loci that were previously reported to affect p53 activity. Notably, we found that the family member most severely affected (226-8, the probands cousin) carried a TP53 haplotype, as well as SNPs on the WT MDM4 allele, that might synergize with the effects of the MDM4T454M mutation. Conversely, a TP53 haplotype for the probands sister (226-2), or SNPs at the WT MDM4 locus for the probands mother (226-4), might antagonize the impact of MDM4T454M allele. Consistent with this, primary fibroblasts from 226-4 and 226-8 exhibited increased p53 activity, but p53 activation was much stronger in cells from 226-8. Our data, thus, appear consistent with the existence of genetic modifiers at the TP53 and MDM4 loci that may affect DC-like phenotypic traits among family members carrying the MDM4 (p.T454M) mutation. However, this remains speculative given the small number of individuals that could be analyzed. Furthermore, nonexonic variants affecting other genes might also contribute to DC-like traits (44). Last, the TP53 and MDM4 polymorphisms considered here were previously evaluated for their potential impact on tumorigenic processes, rather than DC-like traits such as telomere length or bone marrow hypocellularity. Our data suggest that polymorphisms at the TP53 and MDM4 (and possibly MDM2) loci should be evaluated for their potential impact on bone marrow function and telomere biology.

The individuals in this study are participants in an Institutional Review Boardapproved longitudinal cohort study at the NCI entitled Etiologic Investigation of Cancer Susceptibility in Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes (www.marrowfailure.cancer.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00027274) (7). Patients and their family members enrolled in 2008 and completed detailed family history and medical history questionnaires. Detailed medical record review and thorough clinical evaluations of the proband, his sister, parents, and maternal cousin were conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. Telomere length was measured by flow cytometry with in situ hybridization (flow-FISH) (45) in leukocytes of all patients and family members reported. DNA was extracted from whole blood using standard methods. DNA was not available from 226-7 or 226-9 (Fig. 1). Given the time frame of participant enrollment, Sanger sequencing of DKC1, TINF2, TERT, TERC, and WRAP53 was performed first, followed by exome sequencing.

WES of blood-derived DNA for family NCI-226 was performed at the NCIs Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory as previously described (46). Exome enrichment was performed with NimbleGens SeqCap EZ Human Exome Library v3.0 + UTR (Roche NimbleGen Inc., Madison, WI, USA), targeting 96 Mb of exonic sequence and the flanking untranslated regions (UTRs) on an Illumina HiSeq. Annotation of each exome variant locus was performed using a custom software pipeline. WES variants of interest were identified if they met the following criteria: heterozygous in the proband, his mother, and maternal cousin; nonsynonymous; had a minor allele frequency <0.1% in the Exome Aggregation Consortium databases; and occurred <5 times in our in house database of 4091 individuals. Variants of interest were validated to rule out false-positive findings using an Ion 316 chip on the Ion PGM Sequencer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Primers flanking the MDM4 RING domain were used to amplify RING sequences, and PCR products were cloned (or cloned and mutagenized) in the pGST-parallel2 plasmid. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were expressed in BL21 (DE3) cells. After induction for 16 hours at 20C with 0.2 mM IPTG (isopropyl--d-thiogalactopyranoside), soluble proteins were extracted by sonication in lysis buffer [50 mM tris (pH 7.0), 300 mM LiSO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.2% NP-40, complete Protease inhibitors (Roche) 1]. The soluble protein fraction was incubated with Glutathione Sepharose beads (Pharmacia) at 4C for 2 hours, and the bound proteins were washed with 50 mM tris (pH 7.0), 300 mM LiSO4, and 1 mM DTT and then eluted with an elution buffer [50 mM tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, and 15 mM glutathione]. WT and mutant GST-RING proteins (0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 g) or GST alone (0 or 8 g) was incubated with 10 nM ATP and 5 Ci ATP-32P for 10 min at room temperature, filtered through nitrocellulose, and counted by liquid scintillation. Alternatively, 7 g of either WT or mutant GST-RING proteins was incubated with 5 Ci ATP-32P for 10 min at room temperature and increasing amounts (0, 0.02, 2, 20, and 200 M) of ATP or guanosine triphosphate (GTP), filtered through nitrocellulose, and counted by liquid scintillation.

The yeast two-hybrid assays were performed as described (47). Briefly, MDM4 and MDM2 RING open reading frames were cloned in plasmids derived from the two-hybrid vectors pGADT7 (Gal4-activating domain) and pGBKT7 (Gal4-binding domain) creating N-terminal fusions and transformed in yeast haploid strains Y187 and AH109 (Clontech). Interactions were scored, after mating and diploid selection on dropout medium without leucine and tryptophan, as growth on dropout medium without leucine, tryptophan, histidine, and adenine.

U2OS cells (106) were transfected by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with pCDNA3.1 (6 g), or 5 106 cells were transfected with 30 g of pCDNA3.1-MycTag-MDM4WT or pCDNA3.1-MycTag-MDM4TM. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with cycloheximide (50 g/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, C4859), then scratched in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) after 2, 4, or 8 hours, pelleted, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen before protein or RNA extraction with standard protocols.

The targeting vector was generated by recombineering from the RP23-365M5 BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) clone (CHORI BACPAC Resources) containing mouse Mdm4 and downstream sequences of C57Bl6/J origin. A loxP-flanked neomycin cassette (Neo) and a diphtheria toxin gene (DTA) were inserted downstream of the Mdm4 gene, respectively, for positive and negative selections, and a single-nucleotide mutation encoding the missense mutation T454M (TM) was targeted in the exon 11 of Mdm4. The targeting construct was fully sequenced before use.

CK-35 ES cells were electroporated with the targeting construct linearized with Not I. Recombinant clones were identified by long-range PCR, confirmed by Southern blot, PCR, and DNA sequencing (primer sequences in table S4). Two independent recombinant clones were injected into blastocysts to generate chimeras, and germline transmission was verified by genotyping their offspring. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of RNAs from Mdm4TM/TM MEFs showed that the mutant complementary DNA (cDNA) differed from an Mdm4 WT sequence only by the engineered missense mutation. The genotyping of p53+/, p53+/31, and G3 Terc/ mice was performed as previously described (5, 12). All experiments were performed according to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee regulations.

MEFs isolated from 13.5-day embryos were cultured in a 5% CO2 and 3% O2 incubator, in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium GlutaMAX (Gibco), with 15% fetal bovine serum (Biowest), 100 M 2-mercaptoethanol (Millipore), 0.01 mM Non-Essential Amino Acids, and penicillin/streptavidin (Gibco) for five or fewer passages, except for 3T3 experiments, performed in a 5% CO2 incubator for seven passages. Cells were treated for 24 hours with 10 M Nutlin 3a (Sigma-Aldrich) (22) or 15 M cisplatin (Sigma-Aldrich). Primary human fibroblasts at low passage (p.2 for TINF2K280E, p.3 for NCI-226-4 and NCI-226-8, and p.4 for TERTP704S) were thawed and cultured in fibroblast basal medium (Lonza) with 20% fetal calf serum, l-glutamin, 10 mM Hepes, penicillin/streptavidin, and gentamicin before quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis.

Total RNA, extracted using NucleoSpin RNA II (Macherey-Nagel), was reverse transcribed using SuperScript IV (Invitrogen), with, for TERRA quantification, a (CCCTAA)4 oligo as described (48). Real-time qPCRs were performed with primer sequences as described (5, 9, 48) on a QuantStudio using Power SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems).

Protein detection by immunoblotting was performed using antibodies against Mdm2 (4B2), Mdm4 (M0445; Sigma-Aldrich), p53 (AF1355, R&D Systems), actin (A2066; Sigma-Aldrich), p21 (F5; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Myc-Tag (SAB2702192; Sigma-Aldrich), and Rtel1 (from J.-A.L.-V.). Chemiluminescence revelation was achieved with SuperSignal West Dura (Perbio). Bands of interest were quantified by using ImageJ and normalized with actin.

Cells were treated with colcemide (0.5 g/ml) for 1.5 hours, submitted to hypotonic shock, fixed in an (3:1) ethanol/acetic acid solution, and dropped onto glass slides. Quantitative FISH was then carried out as described (5) with a TelC-Cy3 peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe (Panagene). Images were acquired using a Zeiss Axioplan 2, and telomeric signals were quantified with iVision (Chromaphor).

Flow-FISH with mouse cells was performed as described (45). For each animal, either the lungs were collected or the bone marrow from two tibias and two femurs was collected and red blood cells were lysed; then, 2 106 cells were fixed in 500 l of PNA hybridization buffer [70% deionized formamide, 20 mM tris (pH 7.4), and 0.1% Blocking reagent; Roche] and stored at 20C. Either nothing (control) or 5 l of probe stock solution was added to cells [probe stock solution: 10 M TelC-FAM PNA probe (Panagene), 70% formamide, and 20 mM tris (pH 7.4)], and samples were denatured for 10 min at 80C before hybridization for 2 hours at room temperature. After three washes, cells were resuspended in PBS 1, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, ribonuclease A (1000 U/ml), and propidium iodide (12.5 g/ml) and analyzed with an LSR II fluorescence-activated cell sorter. WT and G3 Terc/ mice were included in all flow-FISH experiments, respectively, as controls of normal and short telomeres. For fluorescence shift analyses, the green histograms (corresponding to cells with the telomeric probe) were sliced into 18 windows of equal width and numbered 0 to 17 according to their distance from the median value in cells without the probe, and the number of cells in each window was quantified with ImageJ. The data from two to five mice per genotype were typically used to calculate mean telomere lengths, expressed relative to the mean in WT cells.

Organs were fixed in formol 4% for 24 hours and then ethanol 70% and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard procedures (49). For hemograms, 100 l of blood from each animal was recovered retro-orbitally in a 10-l citrate-concentrated solution (S5770; Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed using an MS9 machine (Melet Schloesing Laboratoires).

DNA extracted from Epstein-Barr virustransformed lymphocytes of NCI-226 family members was amplified with primers flanking nucleotide polymorphisms of interest (primer sequences in table S5), and then PCR products were analyzed by Sanger DNA sequencing.

Analyses with Students t, Mann-Whitney, or Mantel-Cox statistical tests were performed by using GraphPad Prism, and values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the family for valuable contributions to this study. We thank I. Grandjean, C. Caspersen, A. Fosse, and M. Garcia from the Animal Facility, C. Alberti and C. Roulle from the Transgenesis Platform, M. Richardson and A. Nicolas from the Pathology Service, and Z. Maciorowski from the Cell-Sorting Facility of the Institut Curie. We thank A. Chor for help with qPCRs, A. Pyanitskaya, C. Adam, V. Borde, M. Schertzer, and M. Perderiset for plasmids and technical advices, and A. Fajac for comments on the manuscript. F.T. would like to acknowledge the talent, kindness, and loyal support of I. Simeonova and S.J., two exceptional PhD students whose pioneering work led to this study. Funding: The Genetics of Tumor Suppression laboratory received funding from the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Labellisation 2014-2018 and Comit Ile-de-France), the Fondation ARC and the Gefluc. PhD students were supported by fellowships from the Ministre de lEnseignement Suprieur et de la Recherche (to S.J., E.T., and R.D.), the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (to S.J.), and the Fondation pour la Recherche Mdicale (to E.T.). The work of S.A.S., N.G., and B.P.A. was supported by the intramural research program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, and the NIH Clinical Center. Author contributions: V.L. created the Mdm4T454M mouse model, genotyped mouse cohorts, and performed transfections, yeast two-hybrid assays, protein purifications, and molecular cloning. E.T., R.D., and V.L. managed mouse colonies. E.T., R.D., and P.L. performed mouse anatomopathology. I.D., E.T., R.D., F.T., and J.-A.L.-V. determined mouse telomere lengths. V.L. and S.J. genotyped human polymorphisms and analyzed human fibroblasts. E.T. and R.D. genotyped MEFs and performed 3T3 assays. V.L., R.D., and E.T. performed Western blots. E.T., R.D., V.L., S.J., and P.L. performed qPCRs. B.B. and V.L. performed ATP-binding assays. B.P.A. supervised the NCI IBMFS study. N.G. and S.A.S. evaluated study participants. S.A.S. analyzed the exome sequencing data. F.T. and S.A.S. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. The human samples can be provided by S.A.S. pending scientific review and a completed material transfer agreement. Requests for human cells should be submitted to S.A.S.

Follow this link:
Germline mutation of MDM4, a major p53 regulator, in a familial syndrome of defective telomere maintenance - Science Advances

Read More...

This is misinformation on steroids: The Canadian who took on Gwyneth Paltrow is debunking coronavirus myths – Toronto Star

April 11th, 2020 3:53 am

EDMONTONA televangelist selling silver as a cure for COVID-19. The idea that drinking cow urine or bleach will help with symptoms. Or the suggestion that rubbing essential oils on a part of your body where the sun dont shine will protect you.

As someone who has spent decades debunking myths and bad science, whether related to climate change, stem cells or vaccinations, Timothy Caulfield has almost heard it all.

But he says hes never seen anything quite like this.

This is misinformation on steroids, said Caulfield, referring to the COVID-19 infodemic hes hoping to fight.

The University of Alberta professor and health policy expert, host of A Users Guide to Cheating Death on Netflix and author of Is Gwyneth Paltrow Wrong about Everything? is one of many researchers across the country whos received funding from the federal governments Rapid Research Funding Opportunity.

He and his team will be researching how COVID-19 misinformation spreads and how to stop it.

With the coronavirus, what were seeing is those concerns Ive been following for decades really amplified, Caulfield said. Even Ive been astounded the degree to which misinformation in this context is spread and the impact its had.

Here, its been ramped up very quickly, and on an international scale, and at the worst possible time.

YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN...

Caulfield noticed this is the first pandemic of its scale to take place in the era of social media, where information moves fast and furious. And often inaccurately.

And while governments and legacy media were once the gatekeepers of important information related to public health, its much harder to control how misinformation is spread on platforms like Facebook and Twitter, Caulfield said.

Misinformation can contribute to fear, confusion and anxiety in a pandemic. But it also has literal life or death consequences.

There is actual death and physical harm when people listen to misinformation, Caulfield said. And weve seen that play out in the context of the coronavirus.

One of the chemicals touted as possibly effective for COVID-19 is hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria medication. In March, an Arizona man died after consuming chloroquine phosphate, a fish tank cleaner, which he thought was hydroxychloroquine.

One of the interesting aspects of this infodemic that Caulfield has observed is the continuum of misinformation. Some ideas, like drinking bleach, would seem patently absurd to most people.

But then you have this stuff thats kind of in the middle, that seems more plausible or slightly more credible, like that you can boost your immune system (against COVID-19) or that you should be taking supplements, Caulfield said.

On the positive side, there is evidence that people can typically tell when information is accurate if they simply take the time to pause and reflect something Caulfield and his team hope they can help encourage more people to do.

YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN...

I hope that one of the legacies of this event is we can remember the value of good science, the value of trusted voices and also the potential harm of misinformation.

Here are seven supposed coronavirus cures debunked by misinformation expert Timothy Caulfield:

Hydroxychloroquine

The interest in this drug including by the President of the United States (sigh) is largely based on the reporting of one, small, methodologically flawed study. It has led to the hoarding and misuse of the drug. At this point, we dont have the good, clinical data, to support its use. This controversy is a good example of why it is important to report and interpret the emerging science very carefully.

Get the latest in your inbox

Never miss the latest news from the Star, including up-to-date coronavirus coverage, with our free email newsletters

Drinking bleach

This science-free and dangerous idea has been lurking around on social media for a while. It has, for example, been marketed as a cure for autism. It became part of the coronavirus early on largely because people like the conspiracy-loving followers of the far-right QAnon movement pushed it. Many of them also believe the COVID-19 is a hoax. (Still? You guys, still believe this?) While this may seem kooky and needless to say a terrible idea from a health perspective, the mere fact that we know about it shows how fringe ideas can work their way into broader public discourse.

Garlic soup

OK, this one feels more plausible. And garlic is so good! There is also some research that seems to suggest that garlic can help with flu and respiratory infections. In fact, the research remains weak and some of it is in vitro (that is, lab research that doesnt involve actual humans). Be skeptical. Indeed, this one is so popular the World Health Organization recently dealt with this specific myth, noting: There is no evidence from the current outbreak that eating garlic has protected people from the new coronavirus. Still, garlic is healthy!

Drinking silver

This bunk remedy has also been around for a while. It is a classic quack cure-all that has been peddled for every conceivable ailment. There is no evidence to support its use for anything and it may even be harmful. Recently, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the State of Missouri took legal action against televangelist Jim Bakker for selling his Silver Solution as a cure for COVID-19.

Snorting cocaine

Lets just say, um, nope. Not a good idea. Snorting cocaine will not cure or prevent to COVID-19. Incredibly, the French government had to go so far as to tweet out a warning that No, cocaine does NOT protect against COVID-19.

Homeopathy

This is one of the most popular alternative remedies. (Homeopathy is a medical practice based on the idea that the body has the ability to heal itself and that like cures like. That is, if a substance causes a symptom in a healthy person, giving the person a very small amount of the same substance may cure the illness.) There is, however, no evidence homeopathy works or could work. It is, in fact, completely scientifically implausible. Despite this reality, the Indian government proposed the use of homeopathy, which was developed in Germany in the late 18th century, as a possible preventative strategy for the coronavirus. The proposal was widely condemned and the government was forced to do a U-turn.

Drinking cow urine

Nope.

See original here:
This is misinformation on steroids: The Canadian who took on Gwyneth Paltrow is debunking coronavirus myths - Toronto Star

Read More...

Outlook on the Worldwide Precision Medicine Industry to 2025 – Growing Focus on Biomarkers is Promising Ample Opportunities – Yahoo Finance

April 10th, 2020 2:46 pm

Dublin, April 09, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Precision Medicine Market 2019-2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global precision medicine market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 9.8% during the forecast period. Factors such as the increasing prevalence of cancer, central nervous system disorder, and respiratory diseases coupled with the increasing focus on researches focusing on the development of precision medicine are augmenting the market growth. Moreover, the growing focus on the biomarkers is promising ample opportunities for the growth of the personalized medicine market across the globe.

The report analyzes the global precision medicine market on the basis of technology, application, end-use, and geography. On the basis of technology, the market is genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics. Based on the application, the market is classified into oncology, neurology, immunology, and others. Based on the end-user, the market is classified into pharmaceutical companies, diagnostic companies, and healthcare IT companies.

The advancement in genomic and clinical science have established advanced prospects to further customize healthcare to every patient. The Center for Individualized Medicine at Mayo Clinic is practicing personalized medicine and using it to the complete spectrum of healthcare with the use of sophisticated techniques of molecular analysis and genomic sequencing. Microbiome Program by Mayo Clinic enables to understand the cause of transmitting the infection through bacteria. It investigates several questions under the program, such as if microbial communities in the colon could be responsible for irritable bowel symptoms and gluten sensitivity. In addition, it examines the colon organisms affect other body parts, including the joints. The program explores the genetic code of the microorganism of the body. It uses advanced techniques for profiling the microbiome of an individual to detect, prevent and diagnose infections and other diseases. These rising focus of medical centers towards microbiome program for personalized medicine is expanding the scope for the growth of the global personalized medicine market.

Geographically, the market is analyzed into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World. North America is estimated to contribute a significant market share in the global precision medicine industry over the forecast period. Increasing prevalence of cancer, respiratory diseases, and neurological disorders are augmenting the growth of the North America precision medicine market. Moreover, the presence of prominent institutes and market players focusing on the development of precision medicine through researches are also driving the market growth of the region.

Furthermore, the market is characterized by the presence of several players including F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd., Abbott Laboratories Inc., Pfizer Inc., Qiagen NV, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Eagle Genomics, and many others. These players adopt various strategies to capitalize on market growth opportunities. For instance, in October 2018, Eagle Genomics partnered with Microsoft Genomics to tackle the computational challenges of the genomics era. The aim of the partnership was to introduce the scale and power of the cloud to precision medicine, across the production of fundamental research and core services.

The Report Covers:

Key Topics Covered:

1. Report Summary1.1. Research Methods and Tools1.2. Market Breakdown1.2.1. By Segments1.2.2. By Geography

2. Market Overview and Insights2.1. Scope of the Report 2.2. Analyst Insight & Current Market Trends2.2.1. Key Findings2.2.2. Recommendations2.2.3. Conclusion2.3. Rules & Regulations

3. Competitive Landscape3.1. Company Share Analysis3.2. Key Strategy Analysis3.3. Key Company Analysis3.3.1. F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.3.3.1.1. Overview3.3.1.2. Financial Analysis3.3.1.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.1.4. Recent Developments3.3.2. Abbott Laboratories Inc.3.3.2.1. Overview3.3.2.2. Financial Analysis3.3.2.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.2.4. Recent Developments3.3.3. Pfizer Inc.3.3.3.1. Overview3.3.3.2. Financial Analysis3.3.3.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.3.4. Recent Developments3.3.4. Qiagen NV3.3.4.1. Overview3.3.4.2. Financial Analysis3.3.4.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.4.4. Recent Developments3.3.5. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 3.3.5.1. Overview3.3.5.2. Financial Analysis3.3.5.3. SWOT Analysis3.3.5.4. Recent Developments

4. Market Determinants4.1. Motivators4.2. Restraints4.3. Opportunities

5. Market Segmentation5.1. Global Precision Medicine Market by Technology 5.1.1. Genomics5.1.2. Transcriptomics5.1.3. Epigenomics5.2. Global Precision Medicine Market by Application5.2.1. Oncology5.2.2. Neurology 5.2.3. Immunology5.2.4. Others (Respiratory)5.3. Global Precision Medicine Market by End-Use5.3.1. Pharmaceutical Companies5.3.2. Diagnostic Companies5.3.3. Healthcare IT Companies

6. Regional Analysis6.1. North America6.1.1. United States6.1.2. Canada6.2. Europe6.2.1. UK6.2.2. Germany6.2.3. Italy6.2.4. Spain6.2.5. France6.2.6. Rest of Europe6.3. Asia-Pacific6.3.1. China6.3.2. Japan6.3.3. India6.3.4. Rest of Asia-Pacific6.4. Rest of the World

7. Company Profiles

Companies Mentioned

Story continues

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/kdkbgk

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.comLaura Wood, Senior Press Managerpress@researchandmarkets.comFor E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

Originally posted here:
Outlook on the Worldwide Precision Medicine Industry to 2025 - Growing Focus on Biomarkers is Promising Ample Opportunities - Yahoo Finance

Read More...

Page 600«..1020..599600601602..610620..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick