header logo image


Page 235«..1020..234235236237..240250..»

How Miami-Dade opened all its public schools – and kept them open – KVIA El Paso

January 12th, 2021 3:53 am

Alberto Carvalho has been able to do what hundreds of his fellow superintendents have not: fully open his districts schools in the pandemic.

The head of Miami-Dade County Public Schools said hes been able to rely on the advice of scientific experts and follow through on a plan that has worked and gained trust.

Weve been well-informed by public health and medical experts. We convened a task force of experts, in pediatric medicine, in immunology, he told CNN, adding that one of the experts is Dr. Vivek Murthy, whom President-elect Joe Biden has nominated for US Surgeon General.

Weve been in good hands and that has translated into a set of protocols that has left very little room for doubting ourselves.

Those protocols listed in the county website include: daily health checks before students leave home, the wearing of masks and more space around children on school buses and in classrooms and cafeteria.

Carvalhos lack of doubt has helped win over many parents of the more than 350,000 students enrolled in his schools.

When you communicate that to the parents, then theres a sense of calm and trust that parents need prior to sending their students to school, he said.

Miami-Dade is the fourth largest school district in the country and the largest to reopen fully in the fall.

Carvalhos determination stems from his belief that there is no good replacement for in-person instruction.

There is no substitute, regardless of how great the technology may be, he said bluntly. You cannot Zoom effectively into a full understanding, a full level of engagement for students.

Carvalho also sees schools as an indispensable safe harbor for children academically, physically and emotionally even or perhaps especially in the middle of a pandemic.

I am a staunch believer that if we want to keep schools open if we want that normalcy and regularity to continue, if we want that protective umbrella for students, pedagogically speaking, academically speaking, in terms of their cognitive and emotional development if we will want that to happen, then the schools can do all they can in terms of preventative measures in terms of mitigating strategies in terms of protocols.

He said the cases of coronavirus in his schools are lower than in the community at large. Miami-Dade alone has reported more than a fifth of all Covid-19 cases in Florida, according to Johns Hopkins University data. But Carvalho said schools had an advantage.

Here in Miami-Dade, we see a greater adherence to protocols in schools because it is a controlled, safe environment than we see those same protocols being followed in their community in general, whether were talking about the bars and restaurants at the beach or social gatherings, he said.

New York City is seeing a similar outcome after it reopened its public elementary schools last month, despite an increasing coronavirus test positivity rate in the city as a whole.

The city has conducted about 100,000 Covid tests in schools, and found a positivity rate of 0.68%, far below the citywide rate of just under 9%, according to New York City data.

The evidence that schools are not hotbeds of virus spread led New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to reverse a policy requiring schools to close if the community positivity rate hit 9% or higher.

If their schools are below the level of positivity in the community then they can keep the schools open, he said last week, returning more control to local school districts.

While there is no official national database tracking the spread of Covid within schools, independent analysis suggests that schools can safely reopen if proper mitigation strategies are followed.

Its an issue on which even governors from political opposites can share similar views.

Last week Cuomo, a Democrat and frequent critic of President Donald Trump, said: The safest place in New York City is, of course, our public schools.

And last October, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican ally of the President, said: Closing schools due to coronavirus is probably the biggest public health blunder in modern American history.

But many school districts are not ready to reopen. Los Angeles, the second largest district behind New York City, remains fully online, as do San Francisco and Washington, DC.

On Monday, some Chicago students in pre-K and special education got to return to school for the first time since March. But the push to reopen schools was met with heavy resistance from the citys teachers union, which argued that the city had not invested enough in measures to make in-person learning safe for staff and children.

That also appears to be the feeling among many Chicago parents. Students in kindergarten through 8th grade may go back to in-person learning next month, but so far less than one-third have signed up.

Biden said reopening public schools is one of his priorities for his first 100 days in office.

With Miami-Dade already having met that bar, Carvalho has his own next priority in mind: make sure teachers are among the first to be vaccinated.

If our teachers are essential professionals, indispensable to our society, to our economy, then we ought to prioritize their status in terms of access to the vaccine, the superintendent said.

See more here:
How Miami-Dade opened all its public schools - and kept them open - KVIA El Paso

Read More...

New Instrument Will Uncover Structure and Chemical Composition on Sub-Cell Scale – Georgia Tech News Center

January 12th, 2021 3:51 am

Science and Technology

January 11, 2021 Atlanta, GA

Click image to enlarge

Image shows a mass spectrometer and scanning electronic microscope that provide the foundation for the BeamMap system, which can simultaneously determine surface topology and chemical makeup of a biological sample.

A new imaging instrument able to simultaneously study both the surface of a biological sample and its chemical composition is the goal of a three-year, $1.2 million National Institutes of Health (NIH) research award. Combining information from analysis of the chemical composition and physical structure of the surface of cells, tissues and even individual biomolecules inside the cells could provide a new way to study tumor growth, disease progression, cell function, and other key issues.

The technology being developed, termed Beam Enabled Accurate Mapping & Molecular Analyte Profiling (BeamMap), combines data from scanning electron microscopy and a new mode of desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) to simultaneously determine surface topology and chemical makeup. BeamMap uses an electron beam and a focused nanospray of electrified liquid to gather the two types of information, which is correlated with help of image processing software. The research is funded by the National Institute of Healths National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS).

To make this breakthrough tool, we need to be able to provide both topological and chemical information at resolutions on the scale of micrometers and sub-micrometers to be able to discover molecular makeup and biological function at a sub-cellular level, said Andrei Fedorov, Professor and Rae S. and Frank H. Neely Chair in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. This will require simultaneous advances, and we will be pushing the limits of both imaging tools and what mass spectrometers can do.

Because of the use of mass spectrometry for molecular sensing, BeamMap will be able to characterize proteins, metabolites, and lipid chemistry without requiring an a priori knowledge of what chemical species are present. With its ability to correlate chemical information with topological information acquired with focused electron and ion-spray beams in vacuum, the new instrument is expected to provide an order of magnitude improvement in the resolution of electrospray-based techniques, with chemical imaging resolution of approximately 250 nanometers and electron microscopy topological resolution of about 50 nanometers. BeamMap should be useful in fundamental and clinical biology, medicine, analytical chemistry, and bioengineering.

Processes that are currently invisible to us could actually be seen using BeamMap, so we will have evidence for things we can only speculate about now, Fedorov said. Being able to see what is happening at the subcellular level will allow us to get a better understanding of how biological systems behave. That will allow us to create hypotheses for how cells and tissues interact with the environment, potentially leading to a whole host of new therapeutic applications.

Among the major challenges that require an innovative research approach are the creation of soft ionization and highly local sample extraction necessary for keeping the biomolecules intact and the ability to effectively deliver the charged molecules to the vacuum environment of the mass spectrometer, he said.

We will need to fine-tune the energy of the beam that sprays on the substrate to provide the resolution we need, Fedorov said. We need to extract live biomolecules and ionize them without disrupting their structure. To do this, we will have to use the softest possible ionization.

The instrument will use the electrospray technique to create charged molecules of solvent focused in a beam about 100 nanometers in diameter. As the beam of charged solvent molecules hits the surface of the biological sample, it will ablate molecules from samples surface and move them into the surrounding vacuum environment of the SEM imaging chamber. The molecules will be charged and volatilized by the impinging nano-electrospray at a precisely tuned energy input, and then be extracted for immediate analysis in the mass spectrometer.

In parallel, an electron beam that can be focused down to 10 nanometers will be scanning and profiling the structures and features of the surfaces from which the molecules are being extracted by the electrospray. Correlating data from the two beams will provide information about the chemical makeup of the cell surface, the organelles and intracellular structures being imaged topologically.

Using multiple passes of the two beams will allow removal of layers from the samples, allowing internal structures to be mapped. Fedorov said producing each image will require several minutes, the timing limited by the speed at which the samples can be moved into the mass spectrometer and analyzed.

The characterization will be done in an electron microscope vacuum chamber, with the samples on a stage that can be moved in three dimensions. The stage will also provide cooling and hydration for the living samples during the imaging process.

The idea for the instrument came from a discussion with Andrs Garca, Regents' Professor in the George Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and executive director of Georgia Techs Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience. Garca studies pancreatic cells as part of research into diabetes, and plans to use information from the new technique to develop a better understanding of the disease.

BeamMap is an exciting technological advance that will provide unparalleled biological and chemical information with high spatial resolution to analyze complex biological processes, Garca said. We are very much looking forward to applying it to understand diabetes disease progression.

This research was supported by Award 1R01GM138802-01 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH.

Research NewsGeorgia Institute of Technology177 North AvenueAtlanta, Georgia 30332-0181 USA

Media Relations Contact: John Toon (404-894-6986) (jtoon@gatech.edu)

Writer: John Toon

See the original post here:
New Instrument Will Uncover Structure and Chemical Composition on Sub-Cell Scale - Georgia Tech News Center

Read More...

Change is coming, and at an ever-accelerating pace – Al Jazeera English

January 12th, 2021 3:50 am

One of the great science and technology stories of 2020 is the development of COVID-19 vaccines, from start, through testing, to delivery, at a rate never seen before. Not just one vaccine. Three. (With more on the way and not counting the vaccines already in use in China and Russia.) All able to pass rigorous tests and examinations.

Two of them came from Big Pharma.

They threw lots of money and lots of researchers at the problem. We have been taught to expect that that is what they do for us. One of the reasons we think that maybe the primary one is that Big Pharma has thrown lots of money and employed lots of experts to tell us how very useful they are.

The throwing the money part seems to be true of Pfizer. But not for the others.

The US government put between $10bn and $18bn into Operation Warp Speed. Several of the programmes main recipients Johnson & Johnson, Novavax, Sanofi with GlaxoSmithKline have yet to deliver a successful vaccine. Moderna, which has, got about $2.5bn.

A headline from Scientific American stated cogently and concisely: For Billion-Dollar COVID Vaccines, Basic Government-Funded Science Laid the Groundwork. The subhead pointed out: Much of the pioneering work on mRNA vaccines was done with government money, though drugmakers could walk away with big profits.

The third vaccine came from Oxford University (In association with AstraZeneca which is Big Pharma and which received substantial sums from Operation Warp Speed). It appears to be much easier to use. It is going to market at about $6-8 for two doses. Compared with $40 for Pfizer and $50-74 for Moderna, per pair. (A fun fact is that these prices are about 25 percent higher in the US than in the European Union). This should remind us that much of the most important work in medicine has come out of universities and that contributing to health and making money are two separate things.

A far more obscure science and technology story appeared on the front page of the business section of the New York Times on December 29, 2019. It is about a guy named Mike Strizki.

Strizkis story is a throwback to the days of individual tinkerer-inventors. People like that telegraph operator, Thomas Edison, those bicycle mechanics, the Wright Brothers, and a daughter of American aristocracy, Mary Phelps Jacob who was later scandalously famous for her wild parties, drug use, open marriage, her whippet named Clytoris, and being the co-founder of the Black Sun Press, making her the literary godmother to the Lost Generation of expatriate writers in Paris who invented the modern brassiere when she was nineteen.

Strizki is the only guy on the East Coast who drives a hydrogen car.

There are more on the West Coast, nearly 9,000, plus 48 buses. They have 42 stations where they can refuel. There are none on the East Coast. Therefore, Mike makes his own hydrogen fuel in his back yard using solar power. The only byproduct from the process is one atom of oxygen for every two atoms of hydrogen. When the hydrogen is put through fuel cells creating the electricity that drives the car, it recombines with oxygen and the only byproduct is water.Such cars routinely go about 484 kilometres (300 miles) on a full tank. Hyperion claims they have a car that gets a bit over 1,609km (1,000 miles) on a single tank. Refilling them is quicker than refilling the gas tank on the old fashioned internal combustion vehicles most of us drive. They do not have to drag about 453 kilogrammes (1,000 pounds) of batteries like full electric vehicles. Yet, Elon Musk of Tesla, who is hugely invested in battery power cars, calls hydrogen fuel cell cars staggeringly dumb.

Mike has also made the first house in the United States to be powered entirely by hydrogen produced on-site using solar power. Keep in mind that Steve Jobs of Apple, Bill Gates of Microsoft and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook all could be in that category of tinkerer-inventor, at least at their start.

Right now, Elon Musk and his Teslas seem way out ahead of Strizki and his single hydrogen vehicle. But that contest is far from over. Watch for the HTWO, Hyundais new brand dedicated to hydrogen fuel cell power. Daimler Truck, Iveco, OMV, Shell and the Volvo Group are in an alliance named H2Accelerate to promote hydrogen powered trucks.

The point of both of these stories the one about Big Pharma, Big Money, Big University and the other one about the home tinkerer is that science and technology are moving faster and faster.

We are moving closer to actual fusion power. The best research for it seems to be coming out of South Korea. Water cell batteries may soon replace lithium-ion batteries. Check your phone, youve got a computer in your pocket. Quantum computing is on the way. The exponential increase in the amount of material travelling over the internet means we need much greater communication capacity. It is happening. We have gone from megahertz, one million cycles per second, to gigahertz, a billion, and we are on the way to terahertz frequencies, a trillion cycles per second. 3D metal printing is here. Babel earbuds which translate as you go are ready though I must say if its translations are like the ones I get online, it may be like an illiterate babbling in your ear. An Alzheimers blood test may soon be on the market. We can now make artificial structures that mimic early embryos using only stem cells no egg or sperm necessary.

Human history, for the most part, has been a long, flat line of subsistence economies. There were brilliant moments with small brilliant elites but they always rested on the agricultural labour of peons, serfs, slaves, or peasants and fell back again. It was such from the beginning of time until about 1800 with the First Industrial Revolution. Since then, the curve of productivity has been on an upward climb. The 19th and early 20th century is often called the Second Industrial Revolution. We are now in the third, or fourth, or even the fifth industrial revolution or maybe it is the Post-Industrial Revolution or the Digital Age depending on whose book you are reading. Whatever name you prefer to give to this current period, its defining feature remains the same: The changes are coming faster and faster. They are reaching more and more people. They are coming from more and more people.

Yes, of course, we know from the machine guns of WWI, the bombers and then the nuclear weapons of WWII, that technology can be used for destruction. The speed and almost zero cost of internet communication have freed us from the grip of media barons and governments, but then opened the way for exploitation and the spread of disinformation, the existence of alternative facts and tribal truths. Even the changes that would be rated as positive for the general good, are often negative for specific individuals.

We may have anti-science governments. Like the Trump administration has so obviously and obnoxiously been. Yet while they muddled the airwaves with disinformation about the pandemic, they were also the ones who threw billions to science to come up with a vaccine. Big Oil ran campaigns denying climate change, modelled on Big Tobaccos past campaigns claiming cigarettes do not cause cancer,. Yet most of the major oil companies are investing in alternative energy technology.

Big Money invested in established business resists change. Speculative Money and theres lots of it wants to bet on the next big thing which usually has to be, by definition, based on new science and new technology.

This election cycle weve seen that the Internet and social media can do black magic, spreading disinformation, misinformation, and lots of outright lies. They also mean that real information from grammar school to graduate school and beyond is getting to be within reach of the whole world. Its a two-way street. Information, ideas, and research can zip in an instant from a mountain village, a yurt in the desert, public housing, to Harvard, Tohoku, and Oxford.

It would be wonderful if politicians, public intellectuals (if they still exist), sociologists, and economists (should they wish to deal with realities rather than models), turned their thinking and their efforts into figuring out how we as societies and as individuals can best deal with all this change.

Whether they do or they do not, the changes will come, are coming, are here, at that ever-accelerating rate.

The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeeras editorial stance.

Follow this link:
Change is coming, and at an ever-accelerating pace - Al Jazeera English

Read More...

Johns Hopkins Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery receives $15M contribution – The Hub at Johns Hopkins

January 9th, 2021 1:51 am

ByHub staff report

Philanthropist and Johns Hopkins Medicine trustee David M. Rubenstein has made a $15 million commitment to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Johns Hopkins to support the department's research.

Image caption: David M. Rubenstein

The gift, his second pledge of that size to the department, will establish the David M. Rubenstein Precision Medicine Center of Excellence and will deepen his support for basic science researchers focused on the development of therapeutic approaches to preserve and restore hearing. Three strategic project teams, working in collaboration with researchers across Johns Hopkins University, will explore inner ear hair cell repair, sensory neuron repair, and nanomedicine drugs and drug delivery.

Rubenstein's gift will also support core facilities for these teams, consisting of:

Additionally, funds from this gift will support an annual conference and a speaker series.

"David's initial gift has helped Johns Hopkins researchers make important discoveries in several crucial areas related to hearing and hearing loss," said Paul B. Rothman, dean of the School of Medicine and CEO of Johns Hopkins Medicine. "But there is so much more to be done in this area, and once again, David has stepped forward. We are grateful for all that his generosity has made possible so far, and we are even more excited about what this new commitment will allow us to accomplish going forward. In the end, this work will help the millions of people who struggle every day with hearing problems."

Rubenstein's earlier gift to the department, made in 2015, funded the creation of an endowment to support cross-institutional accelerator grants. Any researcher at Johns Hopkins may apply for a grant for new or existing research to further the understanding of hearing. Grant amounts vary. In FY19, a total of $800,000 was awarded to seven different research projects, plus research core support. The earlier gift also established an endowed professorship, providing critical funds in perpetuity to support a leading faculty member in research and teaching.

"David's support has enabled innovative research projects that leverage the expertise and imagination of scientists, engineers, and clinicians from across Johns Hopkins," said Paul Fuchs, the inaugural David M. Rubenstein Research Professor of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery. "This is particularly important as we move from basic discovery of molecular and cellular mechanisms, to targeting these for therapeutic benefit. Current efforts employ gene therapy to correct inherited deafness, to regenerate cochlear hair cells, or to enhance protection from acoustic trauma. Other strategies aim to re-establish lost connections from inner ear to brain, a significant contributor to noise-induced and age-related hearing loss."

To learn more about some of the advances made possible through Rubenstein's generosity and hear from the researchers, visit the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery YouTube playlist.

Rubenstein is a founder and co-executive chairman of The Carlyle Group, a global investment firm. Rubenstein is a noted philanthropist and a long-time member of the Johns Hopkins Medicine board of trustees.

"It is a privilege to support the talented and committed researchers and doctors of Johns Hopkins who are helping people suffering from hearing loss," Rubenstein said. "I am impressed with the progress made in recent years and hope this new gift will accelerate and deepen those efforts."

Read the original:
Johns Hopkins Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery receives $15M contribution - The Hub at Johns Hopkins

Read More...

COVID-19 Impact on Nanomedicine Market Size, Latest Trends, Growth and Share 2020 to 2026| Clinical Cardiology, Urology, Genetics, Orthopedics -…

January 9th, 2021 1:51 am

United States of America:-The Nanomedicine market report provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, impact of domestic and global market players, value chain optimization, trade regulations, recent developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations.

The global Nanomedicine market size is expected to gain market growth in the forecast period of 2020 to 2026, with a CAGR of xx% in the forecast period of 2020 to 2026 and will expected to reach USD xx million by 2026, from USD xx million in 2019.

Under COVID-19 Outbreak, how the Nanomedicine Industry will develop is also analyzed in detail in COVID Impact Chapter of this report.

For Better Understanding, Download FREE Sample Copy of Nanomedicine Market Report(Including full TOC, Graphs, Sample Data, and Tables)@ https://www.marketreportexpert.com/report/Nanomedicine/36175/sample

Some of top players influencing the Global Nanomedicine market:

Clinical Cardiology, Urology, Genetics, Orthopedics, Ophthalmology

Note: We can provide market report in regional language too, German/French/Japanese. We have researched the situation of COVID-19 thoroughly and Our new sample has been updated to reflect COVID-19 Impact on industry trends. We also offer a 25% discount.

Market segmentation

Nanomedicine market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2015-2026, the growth among segments provide accurate calculations and forecasts for sales by Type and by Application in terms of volume and value. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets.

Majortype, primarily split into

Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare

Major applications/end users, including

Regenerative MedicineIn-vitro & In-vivo DiagnosticsVaccinesDrug Delivery

Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry Expert(Note: Our reports include the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry. Our updated sample pages shows impact of Covid-19 on Industry trends.): https://www.marketreportexpert.com/report/Nanomedicine/36175/inquiry

This report examines all the key factors influencing growth of global Nanomedicine market, including demand-supply scenario, pricing structure, profit margins, production and value chain analysis. Regional assessment of global Nanomedicine market unlocks a plethora of untapped opportunities in regional and domestic market places. Detailed company profiling enables users to evaluate company shares analysis, emerging product lines, scope of NPD in new markets, pricing strategies, innovation possibilities and much more.

The Nanomedicine market is analysed and market size information is provided by regions (countries).

The key regions covered in the Nanomedicine market report are North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa. It also covers key regions (countries), viz, U.S., Canada, Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, etc.

The report includes country-wise and region-wise market size for the period 2015-2026. It also includes market size and forecast by Type, and by Application segment in terms of sales and revenue for the period 2015-2026.

Regional analysis is another highly comprehensive part of the research and analysis study of the global Nanomedicine market presented in the report. This section sheds light on the sales growth of different regional and country-level Nanomedicine markets. For the historical and forecast period 2015 to 2026, it provides detailed and accurate country-wise volume analysis and region-wise market size analysis of the global Nanomedicine market.

Get Table of Content, Tables, and Figures of Nanomedicine Market Report: https://www.marketreportexpert.com/report/Nanomedicine/36175/tableofcontent

Some of the key questions answered in this report:

What will the market growth rate, growth momentum or acceleration market carries during the forecast period?Which are the key factors driving the Nanomedicine market?What was the size of the emerging Nanomedicine market by value in 2020?What will be the size of the emerging Nanomedicine market in 2026?Which region is expected to hold the highest market share in the Nanomedicine market?What trends, challenges and barriers will impact the development and sizing of the Global Nanomedicine market?What is sales volume, revenue, and price analysis of top manufacturers of Nanomedicine market?What are the Nanomedicine market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the global Nanomedicine Industry?

The reports conclusion leads into the overall scope of the Global market with respect to feasibility of investments in various segments of the market, along with a descriptive passage that outlines the feasibility of new projects that might succeed in the Global Nanomedicine market in the near future. The report will assist understand the requirements of customers, discover problem areas and possibility to get higher, and help in the basic leadership manner of any organization. It can guarantee the success of your promoting attempt, enables to reveal the clients competition empowering them to be one level ahead and restriction losses.

About Us

Market Report Expert is a futuristic market intelligence company, helping customers flourish their business strategies and make better decisions using actionable intelligence. With transparent information pool, we meet clients objectives, commitments on high standard and targeting possible prospects for SWOT analysis and market research reports.

Contact USJames ThompsonMarket Report ExpertPhone: +1-816-301-6258Email [emailprotected]Web:-https://www.marketreportexpert.com

https://farmingsector.co.uk/

Link:
COVID-19 Impact on Nanomedicine Market Size, Latest Trends, Growth and Share 2020 to 2026| Clinical Cardiology, Urology, Genetics, Orthopedics -...

Read More...

Nanomedicine Market: Industry Analysis and forecast 2026: By Modality, Diseases, Application and Region – LionLowdown

January 9th, 2021 1:51 am

Nanomedicine Market was valued US$ XX Bn in 2018 and is expected to reach US$ XX Bn by 2026, at CAGR of XX% during forecast period of 2019 to 2026.

Nanomedicine Market Drivers and Restrains:Nanomedicine is an application of nanotechnology, which are used in diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and control of biological systems. Nanomedicine usages nanoscale manipulation of materials to improve medicine delivery. Therefore, nanomedicine has facilitated the treatment against various diseases. The nanomedicine market includes products that are nanoformulations of the existing drugs and new drugs or are nanobiomaterials. The research and development of new devices as well as the diagnostics will become, more effective, enabling faster response and the ability to treat new diseases are likely to boost the market growth.

REQUEST FOR FREE SAMPLE REPORT: https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/39223

The nanomedicine markets are driven by factors such as developing new technologies for drug delivery, increase acceptance of nanomedicine across varied applications, rise in government support and funding, the growing need for therapies that have fewer side effects and cost-effective. However, long approval process and risks associated with nanomedicine (environmental impacts) are hampering the market growth at the global level. An increase in the out-licensing of nanodrugs and growth of healthcare facilities in emerging economies are likely to create lucrative opportunities in the nanomedicine market.

The report study has analyzed revenue impact of covid-19 pandemic on the sales revenue of market leaders, market followers and disrupters in the report and same is reflected in our analysis.

Nanomedicine Market Segmentation Analysis:Based on the application, the nanomedicine market has been segmented into cardiovascular, neurology, anti-infective, anti-inflammatory, and oncology. The oncology segment held the dominant market share in 2018 and is projected to maintain its leading position throughout the forecast period owing to the rising availability of patient information and technological advancements. However, the cardiovascular and neurology segment is projected to grow at the highest CAGR of XX% during the forecast period due to presence of opportunities such as demand for specific therapeutic nanovectors, nanostructured stents, and implants for tissue regeneration.

Nanomedicine Market Regional Analysis:Geographically, the Nanomedicine market has been segmented into North America, the Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa. North America held the largest share of the Nanomedicine market in 2018 due to the rising presence of patented nanomedicine products, the availability of advanced healthcare infrastructure and the rapid acceptance of nanomedicine. The market in Asia Pacific is expected to expand at a high CAGR of XX% during the forecast period thanks to rise in number of research grants and increase in demand for prophylaxis of life-threatening diseases. Moreover, the rising investments in research and development activities for the introduction of advanced therapies and drugs are predicted to accelerate the growth of this region in the near future.

Nanomedicine Market Competitive landscapeMajor Key players operating in this market are Abbott Laboratories, CombiMatrix Corporation, General Electric Company, Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Johnson & Johnson. Manufacturers in the nanomedicine are focusing on competitive pricing as the strategy to capture significant market share. Moreover, strategic mergers and acquisitions and technological innovations are also the key focus areas of the manufacturers.

The objective of the report is to present a comprehensive analysis of Nanomedicine Market including all the stakeholders of the industry. The past and current status of the industry with forecasted market size and trends are presented in the report with the analysis of complicated data in simple language. The report covers all aspects of the industry with a dedicated study of key players that includes market leaders, followers and new entrants by region. PORTER, SVOR, PESTEL analysis with the potential impact of micro-economic factors by region on the market are presented in the report. External as well as internal factors that are supposed to affect the business positively or negatively have been analyzed, which will give a clear futuristic view of the industry to the decision-makers. The report also helps in understanding Nanomedicine Market dynamics, structure by analyzing the market segments and project the Nanomedicine Market size. Clear representation of competitive analysis of key players By Type, Price, Financial position, Product portfolio, Growth strategies, and regional presence in the Nanomedicine Market make the report investors guide.

DO INQUIRY BEFORE PURCHASING REPORT HERE: https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/inquiry-before-buying/39223

Scope of the Nanomedicine Market:

Nanomedicine Market by Modality:

Diagnostics TreatmentsNanomedicine Market by Diseases:

Oncological Diseases Infectious Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Orthopedic Disorders Neurological Diseases Urological Diseases Ophthalmological Diseases Immunological DiseasesNanomedicine Market by Application:

Neurology Cardiovascular Anti-Inflammatory Anti-Infectives OncologyNanomedicine Market by Region:

Asia Pacific North America Europe Latin America Middle East AfricaNanomedicine Market Major Players:

Abbott Laboratories CombiMatrix Corporation General Electric Company Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc Johnson & Johnson Mallinckrodt plc. Merck & Company, Inc. Nanosphere, Inc. Pfizer, Inc. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Celgene Corporation UCB (Union Chimique Belge) S.A. AMAG Pharmaceuticals Nanospectra Biosciences, Inc. Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Leadiant Biosciences, Inc. Epeius Biotechnologies Corporation Cytimmune Sciences, Inc.

MAJOR TOC OF THE REPORT

Chapter One: Nanomedicine Market Overview

Chapter Two: Manufacturers Profiles

Chapter Three: Global Nanomedicine Market Competition, by Players

Chapter Four: Global Nanomedicine Market Size by Regions

Chapter Five: North America Nanomedicine Revenue by Countries

Chapter Six: Europe Nanomedicine Revenue by Countries

Chapter Seven: Asia-Pacific Nanomedicine Revenue by Countries

Chapter Eight: South America Nanomedicine Revenue by Countries

Chapter Nine: Middle East and Africa Revenue Nanomedicine by Countries

Chapter Ten: Global Nanomedicine Market Segment by Type

Chapter Eleven: Global Nanomedicine Market Segment by Application

Chapter Twelve: Global Nanomedicine Market Size Forecast (2019-2026)

Browse Full Report with Facts and Figures of Nanomedicine Market Report at: https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/nanomedicine-market/39223/

About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info:

Name: Vikas Godage

Organization: MAXIMIZE MARKET RESEARCH PVT. LTD.

Email: [emailprotected]

Contact: +919607065656/ +919607195908

Website:www.maximizemarketresearch.com

https://lionlowdown.com/

See more here:
Nanomedicine Market: Industry Analysis and forecast 2026: By Modality, Diseases, Application and Region - LionLowdown

Read More...

MCL Landscape Adapts to Changes After CAR T-Cell Therapy Approval – OncLive

January 9th, 2021 1:50 am

Despite the introduction of CAR T-cell therapy to the mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) armamentarium, induction therapy followed by stem cell transplant has maintained a role, said James Gerson, MD, who added that he continues to recommend transplant for patients, since they are still eligible for CAR T-cell therapy upon relapse on transplant.

I tell patients that we have very long-term data that a consolidative transplant for those who are eligible leads to a prolonged remission, Gerson explained. If a patient can be in remission for 10 years, maybe 10 years from now we will have something that is even better and more tolerable than CAR T-cell therapy.

In July 2020, the FDA approved brexucabtagene autoleucel (Tecartus) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. The indication was based on findings from the phase 2 ZUMA-2 trial where brexucabtagene autoleucel, given as a single infusion, induced an 87% objective response rate and a 62% complete response rate in this patient population.

Unlike in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma where more restrictions [with CAR T-cell therapy] exist, any patient with MCL who had 1 prior therapy and relapsed can go straight to CAR T-cell therapy, Gerson said. We can use BTK inhibitors to bridge them, but we dont have to. There are a lot of possibilities.

Though not yet planned, further studies evaluating CAR T-cell therapy in the frontline setting for patients with high-risk MCL may be worth exploring, said Gerson.

In an interview with OncLive during a 2020 Institutional Perspectives in Cancer webinar on hematologic malignancies, Gerson, an assistant professor of clinical medicine at Penn Medicine, discussed navigating treatment selection amid the approval of CAR T-cell therapy in MCL and the role of transplant after induction therapy.

OncLive:What induction regimens do you consider for your patients with MCL and how do you select between possible options?

Gerson: For young, fit patients, there is really no right answer for induction therapy because [treatment selection] is based on phase 2, nonrandomized data. Typically, induction therapy involves high-dose chemotherapy. Im actually very intrigued by a recent publication from the French group that looked at obinutuzumab [Gazyva] with DHAP [dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin; O-DHAP] as frontline therapy for young patients prior to consolidative transplant.

Ive used a lot of R-DHAP [rituximab (Rituxan) plus DHAP], but I havent used this O-DHAP. I think there is rationale to be excited about that option. Even though it is a phase 2 trial, it should [yield] reasonable data to take to insurance and get approval for. Again, it is not something Ive given, but Im very compelled by it and it is something I will try in the coming months.

Then, [we] usually follow [induction therapy] with a stem cell transplant for patients who are eligible.

In the relapsed setting, second-line BTK inhibition is pretty much the standard of care now. There is no right answer between [ibrutinib (Imbruvica) and acalabrutinib (Calquence)]. Anecdotally and by some limited published data, ibrutinib seems to have a higher occurrence of adverse effects [AEs]. Acalabrutinib is a little bit different but seems to be more tolerable in the long run. I tend to tell patients that and then they tend to want the medication that probably has fewer AEs. A lot of us end up choosing acalabrutinib, but from an efficacy standpoint, we have no comparative data. The curves are pretty similar when we look between the 2 trials.

In the era of cellular therapy, what is the role of transplant in MCL?

The challenge, of course, is that with the FDA approval of brexucabtagene autoleucel and CAR T-cell therapy coming into MCL, it is hard to know if we should still be transplanting patients. No one knows the answer because it is obviously not something that has been explored. The only thing that is known is that patients who have been transplanted can still go forward with [CAR T-cell] therapy and respond quite well. Therefore, it is not that getting a transplant means a patient cannot get CAR T-cell therapy in the future.

[With that], I usually tell my patients not to skip transplant because of the approval of brexucabtagene autoleucel in the relapsed/refractory setting. That said, it is an individualized choice. Certainly, some patients might make that choice not to undergo a transplant now that CAR T-cell therapy is available to them should they relapse. Still, in my practice, I will still offer transplant to a patient who is young and fit as a consolidative measure after induction therapy.

Do you see CAR T-cell therapy gaining a more significant role in MCL? Will it eventually moveinto the frontline setting?

Right now, the label given to brexucabtagene autoleucel was very open, [encompassing] any relapsed/refractory patient [with MCL]. That is great not only for patients but for practicing physicians.

[Bringing CAR T-cell therapy to] the frontline setting will likely be investigated in the future, especially for high-risk patients with high MIPI [Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index] scores,TP53mutations, blastoid variant MCL, or pleomorphic variant MCL. [These features] tend to [confer] worse outcomes. There are areas where using [CAR T-cell therapy] in the frontline setting is worth looking into.

It is completely up to the company whether they want to pursue it. Otherwise, it is going to be left to investigator-initiated trials, which are going to be difficult because of the cost associated with CAR T-cell therapy. Some centers may pursue using homegrown CAR T-cell therapy where the cost is much lower for some of these high-risk patients, but I hope the company will pursue such trials in the frontline setting.

What other regimens are potentially on the horizon in MCL and how could they best fit into the paradigm?

There are a lot of similarities between chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] and MCL. A similar triplet strategy to ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and venetoclax [(Venclexta) in CLL] is being looked at in frontline and relapsed/refractory MCL. That is incredibly exciting and could very well supplant typical [cytarabine]-based induction and transplant. We will need long-term follow-up, so we probably wont know for many years.

Thankfully, with minimal residual disease [MRD], we will possibly be able to know much sooner, because if we can get a large percentage of patients into an MRD-negative state, that is a proxy for outcome. Again, we wont know for probably about 10 years before we get that long-term follow-up, but we will have a good enough idea if we [should] use MRD as a surrogate end point.

Reference

Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Eng J Med. 2020;382(14):1331-1342. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1914347

See the original post:
MCL Landscape Adapts to Changes After CAR T-Cell Therapy Approval - OncLive

Read More...

5 questions facing gene therapy in 2021 – BioPharma Dive

January 9th, 2021 1:50 am

Three years ago, the Food and Drug Administration granted a landmark approval to the first gene therapy for an inherited disease, clearing a blindness treatment called Luxturna.

Since then, the regulator has approved one more gene therapy,the spinal muscular atrophy treatment Zolgensma, and given a green light for dozens of biotech and pharmaceutical companies to start clinical testing on others. Genetic medicines for a range of diseases, including hemophilia, sickle cell and several muscular dystrophies, appear in reach, and new science is galvanizing research.

But, entering 2021, the gene therapy field faces major questions after a series of regulatory and clinical setbacks have shaded optimism. "The ups and downs of adolescence are on full display" analysts at Piper Sandler wrote in September, summing up the state of gene therapy research.

Here are five questions facing scientists, drugmakers and investors this year. How they're answered will matter greatly to the patients and families holding out hope for one-time disease treatments.

The FDA was widely expected last year to approve a closely watched gene therapy for hemophilia A, the more common type of the blood disease. Instead, the agency in August surprisingly rejected the treatment, called Roctavian, and asked its developer, BioMarin Pharmaceutical, to gather more data.

The next day, Audentes Therapeutics reported news came a third clinical trial participant had died after receiving the biotech's experimental gene therapy for a rare neuromuscular disease. The tragedy brought flashbacks to past safety scares in gene therapy, although the current wave of treatments being tested have generally appeared safe.

A little less than five months later, the gene therapy field is grappling with two more setbacks. UniQure is exploring whether a study volunteer's liver cancer was caused by its gene therapy for hemophilia B. And Sarepta, one of the sector's top developers, faces significant doubts about its top treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy after disclosing a key study missed one of its main goals.

In each case, the drugmakers involved offered explanations and reasons for optimism. BioMarin still expects to obtain an approval; Audentes' trial is now cleared by the FDA to resume testing; UniQure thinks it's unlikely the cancer case is linked to treatment; and Sarepta argued its negative data were the product of unlucky study design.

But taken together, the developments are powerful reminders of both the stakes and uncertainty still facing gene therapy.

All four events also highlighted lingering worries about one-time genetic treatment. In rejecting Roctavian, for example, the FDA seemed to be concerned the impressive benefit hemophilia patients initially experienced may wane over time. The deaths in Audentes' study, meanwhile,renewed warnings about extremely high doses of gene therapy. Researchers have long watched for evidence that replacing or altering genes may cause cancer to develop in rare instances, particularly after four infants developed leukemia in a gene therapy study in the early 2000s.And Sarepta's negative findings were surprising because early signs of dramatic biological benefit that didn't seem to translate into clear-cut functional gains for all patients.

Experts are still confident gene therapy can deliver on its promise. Bu recent events suggest getting there may take a bit longer than some expected.

"The process is the product," is an often-used cliche about gene therapy, which are complex treatments with exacting manufacturing standards.

Most of the roughly 60,000 pages in Spark Therapeutics' application for approval of Luxturna, for instance, involved what's known in the industry as "chemistry, manufacturing and controls."

The therapeutic basis for gene therapy, by contrast, is much clearer for many of the rare, monogenic diseases that developers are targeting. If mutations in a single gene lead to disease, replacing or otherwise fixing that gene should have a large benefit.

"Genetic medicine is not industrialized serendipity," said Gbola Amusa, an analyst at Chardan, contrasting gene therapy with chemical-based drugs."It often is an engineering question."

In 2020, the FDA gave ample notice that it's watching gene (and cell) therapy manufacturing closely.Sarepta,Voyager Therapeutics,Iovance Biotherapeuticsand Bluebird biowere all forced to revise their development timelines after the agency asked for new details about production processes.

"The FDA is saying to companies that you've got to up your standards," Amusa added.

For their part, FDA officials have indicated the spate of data requests are a product of the sharply higher numbers of companies advancing through clinical testing.

While setbacks have piled up for therapies that seek to replace genes, 2020 was a "transformative year" for therapies designed to edit them, according to Geulah Livshits, an analyst at Chardan.

CRISPR gene editing, already widely recognized as a scientific breakthrough, gained further prestige with the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry to two early pioneers, Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier.

But the year also brought important progress from early biotech adopters.Editas Medicine and Intellia Therapeutics, for example, notched CRISPR firsts with use of the editing technology inside the human body.

And CRISPR Therapeutics and partner Vertex showed their experimental therapy, which uses CRISPR to edit stem cells, worked exceptionally well in the first 10 patients with either sickle cell disease or beta thalassemia treated in two early studies.

The data are the most concrete sign yet that CRISPR's clinical use can live up to its laboratory promise. While all three companies' therapies are still in early stages, their advances have ginned up substantial investor enthusiasm.

Together, the market value of CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas and Intellia totals nearly $25 billion. Beam Therapeutics, a startup that uses a more precise form of gene editing, is worth nearly $6 billion.

"Gene therapy will have a big role to play," said John Evans, Beam's CEO. "But I do think in the last year or so there's a growing realization that, when possible, you'd probably rather edit than add an extra gene."

Clinical tests will prove that out but, until then, the large upswing in share price for gene editing companies may not be sustainable as valuations creep higher and higher. Some of the recent run-up, for instance,appears driven by money flowing from generalist investors through exchange-trade funds, rather than from investors experienced in handicapping preclinical- or early clinical-stage companies.

"They're overdue for some type of rationalization," predicted Brad Loncar, CEO of Loncar Investments, adding that many companies are targeting similar diseases, most commonly sickle cell and beta thalassemia.

Tasked with replacing faulty genes with functional ones, scientists for the most part have turned to two types of viruses to safely shuttle genetic instructions into cells. Adeno-associated viruses, or AAVs,are typically used for infused treatments, while researchers working on cells extracted from patients generally opt for lentiviruses.

Each virus class has advantages, but also notable drawbacks. AAVs, for instance, can trigger pre-existing immune defenses in some people, making those individuals ineligible or poor candidates for gene therapy. Lentiviruses, by contrast, are known to integrate their DNA directly into the genomes of cells they infect a useful attribute in some regards but limiting in others.

Over decades of gene therapy research, scientists have found ways to tweak and modify these viral vectors to better suit their needs, but the basic tools are the same. Jim Wilson, a gene therapy pioneer who ran the study that led to the death of teenager Jesse Gelsinger in 1999, told attendees at a STAT conference last fall that he's "somewhat disappointed" by slow progress in viral vector research.

And as more and more gene therapies enter clinical testing, the limitations of current viral vectors have become more apparent.

The pace of research might be picking up, however. Recently, a number of companies aiming to build better delivery tools have launched, including Harvard University spinout Dyno Therapeutics and 4D Molecular Therapeutics, which recently raised $222 million in an initial public offering.

Larger companies are interested, too. Roche, Sarepta and Novartis have all partnered with Dyno, for example.

In gene editing, meanwhile, researchers are developing new ways to cut DNA, while Beam and others are advancing different editing approaches altogether.

Billions of dollars have flowed from pharmaceutical companies into gene therapy over the past few years, leaving few large multinational drugmakers without a research presence.

2020 was no different, with sizable acquisitions inked by Bayer and Eli Lilly, as well as an array of smaller investments from Pfizer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Biogen,and UCB. And CSL Behring, best known for its blood plasma products, spent nearly half a billion dollars to buy UniQure's most advanced gene therapy, a treatment for hemophilia B.

Over the past three years, there's been at least $30 billion spent on biotechs involved in gene or cell therapy. (Four deals account for the majority of that value.)

All of that dealmaking, while following promising and compelling science, is ultimately a bet that one-time genetic treatments can be scaled up and commercialized into a lucrative business.

Many of the acquired companies are working on therapies for very rare disorders affecting hundreds or thousands of people. A handful, however, are taking aim at more prevalent conditions, starting with still relatively uncommon diseases like hemophilia to ones affecting millions of people like Parkinson's.

"For gene therapy to meet our lofty expectations not just for investors, but for society it has to make the leap from these ultra-rare diseases," said Loncar.

Commercially, the track record for the few therapies on the market in the U.S. is mixed.Luxturna, now owned by Roche, is a niche product.Zolgensma has broader use and earned Novartis about $1 billion in the year and a half it's been commercially available.

Two cell therapies from Novartis and Gilead, meanwhile, have struggled to gain traction.

Gene therapy's biggest commercial test yet was supposed to come this year, with the expected approval of BioMarin's Roctavian in hemophilia A. The FDA's surprise rejection could mean a yearslong delay in the U.S., but the challenges of pricing, reimbursement and patient access in gene therapy remain dauntingly large.

See the article here:
5 questions facing gene therapy in 2021 - BioPharma Dive

Read More...

RNA molecules are masters of their own destiny – MIT News

January 9th, 2021 1:50 am

At any given moment in the human body, in about 30 trillion cells, DNA is being read into molecules of messenger RNA, the intermediary step between DNA and proteins, in a process called transcription.

Scientists have a pretty good idea of how transcription gets started: Proteins called RNA polymerases are recruited to specific regions of the DNA molecules and begin skimming their way down the strand, synthesizing mRNA molecules as they go. But part of this process is less-well understood: How does the cell know when to stop transcribing?

Now, new work from the labs of Richard Young, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research member and MIT professor of biology, and Arup K. Chakraborty, professor of chemical engineering, physics, and chemistry at MIT, suggests that RNA molecules themselves are responsible for regulating their formation through a feedback loop. Too few RNA molecules, and the cell initiates transcription to create more. Then, at a certain threshold, too many RNA molecules cause transcription to draw to a halt.

The research, published in Cell on Dec. 16, 2020, represents a collaboration between biologists and physicists, and provides some insight into the potential roles of the thousands of RNAs that are not translated into any proteins, called noncoding RNAs, which are common in mammals and have mystified scientists for decades.

A question of condensates

Previous work in Youngs lab has focused on transcriptional condensates, small cellular droplets that bring together the molecules needed to transcribe DNA to RNA. Scientists in the lab discovered the transcriptional droplets in 2018, noticing that they typically formed when transcription began and dissolved a few seconds or minutes later, when the process was finished.

The researchers wondered if the force that governed the dissolution of the transcriptional condensates could be related to the chemical properties of the RNA they produced specifically, its highly negative charge. If this were the case, it would be the latest example of cellular processes being regulated via a feedback mechanism an elegant, efficient system used in the cell to control biological functions such as red blood cell production and DNA repair.

As an initial test, the researchers used an in vitro experiment to test whether the amount of RNA had an effect on condensate formation. They found that within the range of physiological levels observed in cells, low levels of RNA encouraged droplet formation and high levels of RNA discouraged it.

Thinking outside the biology box

With these results in mind, Young lab postdocs and co-first authors Ozgur Oksuz and Jon Henninger teamed up with physicist and co-first author Krishna Shrinivas, a graduate student in Arup Chakrabortys lab, to investigate what physical forces were at play.

Shrinivas proposed that the team build a computational model to study the physical and chemical interactions between actively transcribed RNA and condensates formed by transcriptional proteins. The goal of the model was not to simply reproduce existing results, but to create a platform with which to test a variety of situations.

The way most people study these kinds of problems is to take mixtures of molecules in a test tube, shake it and see what happens, Shrinivas says. That is as far away from what happens in a cell as one can imagine. Our thought was, Can we try to study this problem in its biological context, which is this out-of-equilibrium, complex process?

Studying the problem from a physics perspective allowed the researchers to take a step back from traditional biology methods. As a biologist, it's difficult to come up with new hypotheses, new approaches to understanding how things work from available data, Henninger says. You can do screens, you can identify new players, new proteins, new RNAs that may be involved in a process, but you're still limited by our classical understanding of how all these things interact. Whereas when talking with a physicist, you're in this theoretical space extending beyond what the data can currently give you. Physicists love to think about how something would behave, given certain parameters.

Once the model was complete, the researchers could ask it questions about situations that may arise in cells for instance, what happens to condensates when RNAs of different lengths are produced at different rates as time ensues? and then follow it up with an experiment at the lab bench. We ended up with a very nice convergence of model and experiment, Henninger says. To me, it's like the model helps distill the simplest features of this type of system, and then you can do more predictive experiments in cells to see if it fits that model.

The charge is in charge

Through a series of modeling and experiments at the lab bench, the researchers were able to confirm their hypothesis that the effect of RNA on transcription is due to RNAs molecules highly negative charge. Furthermore, it was predicted that initial low levels of RNA enhance and subsequent higher levels dissolve condensates formed by transcriptional proteins. Because the charge is carried by the RNAs phosphate backbone, the effective charge of a given RNA molecule is directly proportional to its length.

In order to test this finding in a living cell, the researchers engineered mouse embryonic stem cells to have glowing condensates, then treated them with a chemical to disrupt the elongation phase of transcription. Consistent with the models predictions, the resulting dearth of condensate-dissolving RNA molecules increased the size and lifetime of condensates in the cell. Conversely, when the researchers engineered cells to induce the production of extra RNAs, transcriptional condensates at these sites dissolved. These results highlight the importance of understanding how non-equilibrium feedback mechanisms regulate the functions of the biomolecular condensates present in cells, says Chakraborty.

Confirmation of this feedback mechanism might help answer a longstanding mystery of the mammalian genome: the purpose of non-coding RNAs, which make up a large portion of genetic material. While we know a lot about how proteins work, there are tens of thousands of noncoding RNA species, and we dont know the functions of most of these molecules, says Young. The finding that RNA molecules can regulate transcriptional condensates makes us wonder if many of the noncoding species just function locally to tune gene expression throughout the genome. Then this giant mystery of what all these RNAs do has a potential solution.

The researchers are optimistic that understanding this new role for RNA in the cell could inform therapies for a wide range of diseases. Some diseases are actually caused by increased or decreased expression of a single gene, says Oksuz, a co-first author. We now know that if you modulate the levels of RNA, you have a predictable effect on condensates. So you could hypothetically tune up or down the expression of a disease gene to restore the expression and possibly restore the phenotype that you want, in order to treat a disease.

Young adds that a deeper understanding of RNA behavior could inform therapeutics more generally. In the past 10 years, a variety of drugs have been developed that directly target RNA successfully. RNA is an important target, Young says. Understanding mechanistically how RNA molecules regulate gene expression bridges the gap between gene dysregulation in disease and new therapeutic approaches that target RNA.

Read more from the original source:
RNA molecules are masters of their own destiny - MIT News

Read More...

Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market: Industry Analysis and Forecast (2019-2026): By indication type, treatment type,…

January 9th, 2021 1:50 am

The Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment market is expected to grow from US$ XXBn in 2018 to USD XX Bn by 2026, at a CAGR of 6.1% during the forecast period.

Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment marketThe report study has analyzed revenue impact of COVID -19 pandemic on the sales revenue of market leaders, market followers and market disrupters in the report and same is reflected in our analysis.Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) a new biotechnology, is the product of a heightened interest in cell-based therapy and tissue engineering. This therapy is defined as an autologous preparation of plasma with concentrated platelets.

Global Atomic Force Microscopes Market Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Drivers and RestrainsFactors contributing to the growth of this market include rise in disease awareness, treatment rate, and growing adoption of novel treatment therapies providing positive patient outcome. Moreover, lower incidences of negative side effects of this therapy are anticipated to fuel demand for platelet rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell therapy.

Treatment options for androgenic alopecia are limited and include topical minoxidil and oral finasteride (FDA approved) alone or in combination. Several reported side effects such as headache and increase in body hair are there for minoxidil whereas loss of libido has been reported with oral finasteride are considered to be major restraint to the global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market.

Hair loss is one of the significant factors that will foster the global hair transplant market growth over the projection period. Increasing patient pool in developing countries significant success rate and hair transplant procedures coupled with innovative technologies also help hair transplant market to grow seamlessly in the near future.

Advance treatments for alopecia are enhanced by dermatologists and patients over regular medications, for example, corticosteroids. More prominent inclination for these treatments emerges from proficient and quicker hair regrowth when contrasted with other corticosteroid medications. Furthermore, simplicity of organization of these novel treatments is anticipated to boost the global market.

Request For View Sample Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Report Pagehttps://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/request-sample/36142/

Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market by key segments

The stem cell therapy segment has been further classified into bone marrow treatment and adipose treatment. The dermatology clinics segment accounted for 88% of the total market revenue in 2018, owing to its lower therapy cost as compared to hospitals.

About 45% men and 35% women develop androgenic alopecia by 60, which is the highest among all the types of alopecia in the year 2018. A study published in the International Journal of Womens Dermatology in 2019 revealed that the use of PRP to treat androgenic alopecia is promising due to its autologous nature, minimal invasiveness, lack of major side effects, and low cost compared to hair restoration surgery.

Global Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Treatment Market Regional AnalysisNorth America is anticipated to held leading position for global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market . In 2018, XX% of women suffer from androgenetic alopecia in North America. This has led the country to dominate the platelet rich plasma & stem cell alopecia treatment market in North America. The market in Asia Pacific is projected to expand at a significantly high CAGR during the forecast period, owing to the emergence of strong local manufacturers offering various technological advancements for platelet rich plasma & stem cell alopecia treatment at lower prices and increase in awareness among people about these treatment methods. Additionally, highest application of PRP for the treatment of alopecia has been observed in the past few years. This is likely to fuel the market in the region. Furthermore, technological advances and huge numbers of investments in Platelet Rich Plasma Therapies by key players are likely to fuel the global market in the emerging regions such as in china and India.

The objective of the report is to present comprehensive analysis of Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market including all the stakeholders of the industry. The past and current status of the industry with forecasted market size and trends are presented in the report with the analysis of complicated data in simple language. The report covers the all the aspects of industry with dedicated study of key players that includes market leaders, followers and new entrants by region. PORTER, SVOR, PESTEL analysis with the potential impact of micro-economic factors by region on the market have been presented in the report. External as well as internal factors that are supposed to affect the business positively or negatively have been analyzed, which will give clear futuristic view of the industry to the decision makers.

Do Inquiry Before Purchasing Market Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Report Here:@https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/inquiry-before-buying/36142/

The report also helps in understanding Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market dynamics, structure by analyzing the market segments, and project the Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market size. Clear representation of competitive analysis of key players by Type, price, financial position, product portfolio, growth strategies, and regional presence in the Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market make the report investors guide.Global Platelet Rich Plasma & Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market, by Treatment

Platelet Rich Plasma Therapies Stem Cell TherapyGlobal Platelet Rich Plasma & Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market, by Indication

Androgenic Alopecia Congenital Alopecia Cicatricial or Scarring AlopeciaGlobal Platelet Rich Plasma & Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market, by Type

Men womenKey players operating on Global Platelet Rich Plasma & Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market

Kerastem Eclipse Regen Lab SA Restore Hair Replicel LifeScience Histogen Inc. Glofinn Oy Orange County Hair Restoration Center, Hair Sciences Center of Colorado, Anderson Center for Hair, Evolution Hair Loss Institute, Savola Aesthetic Dermatology Center, Virginia Surgical Center, Hair Transplant Institute of Miami, Colorado Surgical Center & Hair Institute.

Major Table Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market of Contents Report

Chapter One: Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Overview

Chapter Two: Manufacturers Profiles

Chapter Three: Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Competition, by Players

Chapter Four: Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Size by Regions

Chapter Five: North America Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Revenue by Countries

Chapter Six: Europe Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Revenue by Countries

Chapter Seven: Asia-Pacific Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Revenue by Countries

Chapter Eight: South America Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Revenue by Countries

Chapter Nine: Middle East and Africa Revenue Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment by Countries

Chapter Ten: Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Segment by Type

Chapter Eleven: Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Segment by Application

Browse Full Report with Facts and Figures of Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market Report at:https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-platelet-rich-plasma-and-stem-cell-alopecia-treatment-market/36142/

About Us:

Maximize Market Research provides B2B and B2C market research on 20,000 high growth emerging technologies & opportunities in Chemical, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Electronics & Communications, Internet of Things, Food and Beverages, Aerospace and Defense and other manufacturing sectors.

Contact info:

Name: Vikas Godage

Organization: Maximize Market Research Pvt. Ltd.

Email:[emailprotected]

Contact: +919607065656 / +919607195908

Website: http://www.maximizemarketresearch.com

Connect With us at LinkedInLinkedIn

Connect with us at FacebookFacebook

Contact With Us at TwitterTwitter

https://lionlowdown.com/

Read the original post:
Global Platelet Rich Plasma and Stem Cell Alopecia Treatment Market: Industry Analysis and Forecast (2019-2026): By indication type, treatment type,...

Read More...

Harpoon Therapeutics : Clin Cancer Res 2021; OnlineFirst version Jan 6, 2021 – Marketscreener.com

January 9th, 2021 1:50 am

Published OnlineFirst December 1, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3392

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH | TRANSLATIONAL CANCER MECHANISMS AND THERAPY

Preclinical Characterization of HPN536, a Trispecic, T-Cell-Activating Protein Construct for the Treatment of Mesothelin-Expressing Solid Tumors A C

Mary Ellen Molloy1, Richard J. Austin1, Bryan D. Lemon1, Wade H. Aaron1, Vaishnavi Ganti1, Adrie Jones1,

Susan D. Jones1, Kathryn L. Strobel1, Purbasa Patnaik1, Kenneth Sexton1, Laurie Tatalick1, Timothy Z. Yu1, Patrick A. Baeuerle1,2,3, Che-Leung Law1, and Holger Wesche1

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Mesothelin (MSLN) is a glycophosphatidylinositol- linked tumor antigen overexpressed in a variety of malignancies, including ovarian, pancreatic, lung, and triple-negative breast can- cer. Early signs of clinical efcacy with MSLN-targeting agents have validated MSLN as a promising target for therapeutic inter- vention, but therapies with improved efcacy are still needed to address the signicant unmet medical need posed by MSLN- expressing cancers.

Experimental Design: We designed HPN536, a 53-kDa, tri- specic, T-cell-activatingprotein-based construct, which binds to MSLN-expressing tumor cells, CD3e on T cells, and to serum albumin. Experiments were conducted to assess the potency, activ-

Introduction

Redirection of cytotoxic T cells with bispecic antibody constructs for cancer therapy has been validated in the clinic (1-6). Blinatumo- mab is the rst and thus far the only bispecic T-cell engager (BiTE) approved by the FDA (7). T-cell-engaging biologics function by forming an immunologic cytolytic synapse between cancer target cells and T cells, which leads to target cell lysis independent of T-cell receptor (TCR) specicity, peptide antigen presentation by HLA, and T-cell costimulation. Despite the clinical success of blinatumomab for treating relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia, other molecules, including BiTE antibodies, showed only limited activity in the treatment of solid tumors (8, 9). Their short plasma half-life required continuous intravenous infusion limiting their utility for most solid tumor indications. Novel designs for T-cell-engaging antibodies aim at overcoming limitations of the rst generation and are already being tested in clinical trials (10).

The Trispecic T-cell-Activating Construct (TriTAC) design has been specically developed to treat solid tumors (11). TriTACs consist of a single polypeptide chain aligning three humanized, antibody- derived binding domains: a single-domain antibody (sdAb) specic for

1Harpoon Therapeutics, South San Francisco, California. 2MPM Capital, Cam- bridge, Massachusetts. 3Institute for Immunology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Planegg- Martinsried, Munich, Germany.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Corresponding Author: Mary Ellen Molloy, Harpoon Therapeutics, 131 Oyster

Point Boulevard, 300, South San Francisco, CA 94080. Phone: 773-318-0796;

E-mail: mmolloy@harpoontx.com

Clin Cancer Res 2020;XX:XX-XX

doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3392

2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

ity, and half-life of HPN536 in in vitro assays, rodent models, and in nonhuman primates (NHP).

Results: HPN536 binds to MSLN-expressing tumor cells and to CD3e on T cells, leading to T-cell activation and potent redirected target cell lysis. A third domain of HPN536 binds to serum albumin for extension of plasma half-life. In cynomolgus monkeys, HPN536 at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg demonstrated MSLN- dependent pharmacologic activity, was well tolerated, and showed pharmacokinetics in support of weekly dosing in humans.

Conclusions: HPN536 is potent, is well tolerated, and exhibits extended half-life in NHPs. It is currently in phase I clinical testing in patients with MSLN-expressing malignancies (NCT03872206).

a tumor antigen, a sdAb specic for serum albumin for half-life extension, and a single-chain fragment variable (scFv) specic for the CD3e subunit of the TCR complex (11). Their molecular size of 53 kDa is about one-third of that of an IgG. Binding of TriTACs to tumor antigen and CD3e is monovalent, which minimizes off-target CD3e clustering that can potentially lead to nonspecic T-cell activation. The absence of an Fc-gamma domain for half-life extension is functionally compensated by an albumin-binding domain. HPN424 (11) and HPN536, the rst two TriTACs are in phase I clinical testing in hormone refractory prostate cancer and mesothelin (MSLN)-over- expressing solid tumors, respectively.

Human MSLN is produced as a 71-kDa precursor of 628 amino acids, which is expressed as a glycophosphatidylinositol-linked cell surface glycoprotein. Its 31-kDaN-terminal domain is released as a soluble protein, termed as the megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF), while the 40-kDaC-terminal domain remains attached to the plasma membrane as mature MSLN (12-14). MSLN expression on normal tissue is conned to the single-cell mesothelial layer covering the surface of tissues and organs of the pleural, pericardial, and peritoneal cavities (13, 15). MUC16/CA125 is a binding partner for MSLN, implicating a role for MSLN in cell adhesion (16, 17). However, the precise physiologic functions of MSLN have not been dened, and MSLN-knockout mice exhibit no detectable phenotype or developmental abnormality (18).

MSLN is overexpressed in many malignancies, including ovarian cancer (13, 15, 19), pancreatic cancer (20, 21), non-small cell lung cancer (22-26),triple-negative breast cancer (26, 27), and mesothe- lioma (28, 29). In triple-negative breast cancer (25) and in lung and pancreatic adenocarcinomas (22, 23, 30), overexpression of MSLN correlates with poor prognosis. Differential expression of MSLN in cancer versus normal tissue has made it an attractive target for MSLN- directed imaging agents and therapeutics (10, 31-33). A challenge in developing MSLN-directed therapeutics is the expression of MSLN on normal mesothelial cells, potentially leading to dose-limiting toxicities.

Published OnlineFirst December 1, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3392

Molloy et al.

Translational Relevance

Patients with mesothelin (MSLN)-overexpressing tumors, including ovarian, pancreatic, lung, and triple-negative breast cancer, have a high unmet clinical need. A number of MSLN- targeted therapeutics have been developed that show limited efcacy and safety in clinical trials. HPN536 is a novel, MSLN- targeted, trispecic, T-cell-activating protein construct that can potently redirect T cells to lyse tumor cells and was remarkably well tolerated in nonhuman primates at single doses up to 10 mg/kg, which is far above the expected therapeutic dose level. Our ndings suggest that HPN536 has the potential for high clinical activity and a wide therapeutic window. Its long serum half-life supports once-weekly dosing in humans. Currently, HPN536 is the only MSLN-targeting,T-cell-engaging biologic in clinical testing.

HPN536 specically redirects T cells for potent redirected lysis of MSLN-expressing cancer cells with concomitant T-cell activation. In three different mouse xenograft models, HPN536 induced durable antitumor activity at very low doses. In cynomolgus monkeys, HPN536 was well tolerated, showed a long serum half-life, and elicited signs of target engagement on mesothelial structures.

Materials and Methods

Protein production

Sequences of TriTACs, sdAbs, and extracellular domains of target proteins fused to an Fc domain or a hexahistidine tag were cloned into mammalian expression vector, pcDNA 3.4 (Invitrogen), preceded by a leader sequence. Expi293 Cells (Life Technologies) were maintained in suspension in Optimum Growth Flasks (Thomson) between 0.2 and

8 106 cells/mL in Expi293 media. Puried plasmid DNA was transfected into Expi293 cells in accordance with Expi293 Expression System Kit (Life Technologies) protocols and cultured for 4-6 days after transfection. Alternatively, HPN536 was produced in CHO- DG44 DHFR-decient cells (34). The amount of expressed proteins in conditioned media was quantitated using an Octet RED96 instru- ment with Protein A Tips (ForteBio/Pall) using appropriate puried control proteins for a standard curve. Conditioned media from either host cell were ltered and puried by protein A afnity and desalted or subjected to preparative size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using an AKTA Pure Chromatography System (GE Healthcare). Protein A puried TriTAC proteins were further puried by ion exchange and

formulated in a buffered solution containing excipients. Final purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE by resolving 2.5 mg/lane on TRIS-Glycine

gels and visualized with Simply Blue Stain (Life Technologies). Native purity was also assessed by analytic SEC using a Yarra SEC150 3 mm

4.6 150 mm Column (Phenomenex) resolved in an aqueous/organic mobile phase buffered at neutral pH on a 1290 LC system and peaks were integrated with OpenLab ChemStation Software (Agilent Technologies).

In vitro afnity measurements

Afnities of HPN536 analyte for albumin, CD3e, and MSLN ligands were measured by biolayer interferometry using an Octet RED96 instrument with Streptavidin Tips (ForteBio/Pall). Experiments were performed at 27 C in PBS plus casein in the absence or presence of 15 mg/mL has, as described in Results section and gure legends. Binding sensograms generated from empirically determined ligand

loads, appropriate serial dilutions of known analyte concentrations, and association and dissociation times were then t globally to a one- to-one binding model using Octet DataAnalysis 9.0 software.

In vitro T-cell-dependent cell cytotoxicity and T-cell activation assays

T cells from healthy donors were puried from leukopaks (leuka- pheresis samples, StemCell Technologies) using EasySep Human T Cell Isolation Kits (StemCell Technologies, 17951) following the manufacturer's instructions. All cancer cell lines were obtained from the ATCC, with the exception of OVCAR8 cells, which were obtained from the NCI (Bethesda, MD). Cell lines were passaged a maximum of 36 times after being received from the ATCC. Cell line authentication and Mycoplasma testing were not performed. T-cell-dependent cell cytotoxicity (TDCC) assays were performed as described previously (35). Briey, luciferase-expressing target cells and puried human T cells were seeded per well of a 384-well plate at a 10:1 T cell-to-target cell ratio. Target cell killing was assessed following incubation for 48 hours at 37oC and 5% CO2. Target cell viability was assessed by incubation with the SteadyGlo Reagent (Promega). Luminescence was measured using a PerkinElmer EnVision Detection System. Activated T cells were identied by CD69 and CD25 surface expression (BD Biosciences). Samples were analyzed on a FACSCelesta Flow Cyt- ometer (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry data were processed using FlowJo v10 Software (FlowJo, LLC).

Binding of HPN536 on MSLN-expressing OVCAR and T cells Cultured cells were incubated with 1 mg/mL HPN536 or anti-GFP

TriTAC (control) for 1 hour. Binding was detected using Alexa647- anti-TriTAC antibody using a FACSCelesta Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences). The QIFIKIT (Dako) was used according to the man- ufacturer's instructions to estimate the number of MSLN molecules expressed per cell.

Cytokines in the presence of T cells

To measure the cytokines, AlphaLISA Kits were used (PerkinElmer) per the manufacturer's instructions, except that the assays were performed in 384-well plates instead 96-well plates. Plates containing conditioned media from TDCC assays were used for analysis. Plates were read on a PerkinElmer EnVision Plate Reader equipped with an AlphaLISA module.

In vivo mouse efcacy studies

All mouse studies were performed in accordance with the policies of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at

Harpoon Therapeutics and Charles River Laboratories. For TOV21G and HPAFII experiments, NCG (NOD-Prkdcem26Cd52Il2rgem26Cd22/

NjuCrl) mice received subcutaneous coimplants of human cancer cells (5 106) and human T cells (5 106) in 50% Matrigel (BD Biosciences) on day 0. Human T cells were expanded before implantation using Human T Cell Activation/Expansion Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mice were dosed on days 1-15 (HPAFII, Fig. 4A and TOV21G, Fig. 4C) or days 7-16 (HPAFII, Fig. 4B) via intraperitoneal injection. For NCI-H292 experi- ments, NCG mice received subcutaneous coimplants of human cancer cells (1 107) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC;

1 107). Mice were administered HPN536 daily for 10 days starting on

day 6 via intravenous injection. Tumor size was measured twice weekly and calculated using the following formula: tumor volume (mm3)

(w2 l)/2. Percent tumor growth inhibition (%TGI) was dened as the difference between the mean tumor volume (MTV) of the control

OF2 Clin Cancer Res; 2021

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH

Rela

HPN536

An

group and the MTV of the treated group, expressed as a percentage of the MTV of the control group.

Exploratory cynomolgus monkey dose range-ndingstudy The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity of HPN536

were evaluated after a single intravenous bolus dose of 0.1, 1.0, or 10 mg/kg HPN536 in one male and one female cynomolgus monkey per group followed by either a 1- or 3-weekpostdose recovery period. The study followed the protocol and standard operating procedures of the testing facility (Charles River Labo- ratories) and was approved by their IACUC. Pharmacologic activ- ity was evaluated by clinical observations, cytokine assessments, ow cytometry, and evidence of target engagement by histology. Two research electrochemiluminescence assays, a functional assay and an anti-idiotypeassay, were used for measuring HPN536 levels in serum. For the functional assay, HPN536 was captured with biotinylated CD3e and was detected with a sulfo-taggedMSLN. For the anti-idiotypeassay, HPN536 was captured with an anti- idiotype antibody recognizing the anti-albumindomain and was detected with a sulfo-taggedCD3e. Toxicokinetic parameters were estimated using Phoenix WinNonlin pharmacokinetic software. A noncompartmental approach, consistent with the intravenous bolus route of administration, was used for parameter estimation.

Published OnlineFirst December 1, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3392

HPN536 an Anti-MSLN/Anti-CD3T-Cell Engager for Solid Tumors

Toxicity endpoints included daily morbidity and mortality, daily clinical observations, weekly body weights, daily food consump- tion, clinical pathology (hematology, clinical chemistry, and coag- ulation), and anatomic pathology (gross necropsy, organ weights, and histopathology).

Results

Production, structure, and biochemical characteristics of

HPN536

Recombinant HPN536 has a molecular weight of approximately

53 kDa. A humanized llama sdAb specic for human MSLN is placed at its N-terminus (Fig. 1A). A humanized llama sdAb specic for human serum albumin (HSA) is placed in the middle of the molecule. The C-terminal end contains a humanized scFv specic for the human CD3e subunit of the TCR complex. GGGGSGGGS linkers connect the three binding domains.

HPN536 is produced by eukaryotic cell culture and secreted as a single, nonglycosylated polypeptide. Stability studies subjecting HPN536 to various stress conditions, including multiple freeze thaw cycles and storage at 4 C and 40 C for 2 weeks, suggest the protein is stable and stress resistant (Supplementary Fig. S1). The high stability of HPN536 ensures limited aggregation, which would otherwise lead to

huMSLN

huCD3e

huALB

A

B

MSLN

ALB

MSLN

CD3

ALB

CD3

In vitro anity

Human KD (nmol/L)

0.21

6.6

6.3

measurements

CynoK D (nmol/L)

1.1

6.2

5.6

Mouse (nmol/L)

210

NB

170

HPN536 binding to MSLN-

HPN536 binding to

expressing OVCAR8 cells

See the original post:
Harpoon Therapeutics : Clin Cancer Res 2021; OnlineFirst version Jan 6, 2021 - Marketscreener.com

Read More...

This Scientist Is Harnessing The Rich Genetic Diversity Of African Cattle – Forbes

January 9th, 2021 1:49 am

Cameroonian scientist Appolinaire Djikeng, Director of the Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics ... [+] and Health (CTLGH), holding a chicken.

Cameroonian geneticist Appolinaire Djikeng grew up in a family that depended on livestock for their livelihood, now he is using Africa's livestock genetic diversity to help the 1.3 billion people who depend on livestock for food and income.

Djikeng, the Director of the Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH), a research alliance with scientific bases in Scotland, Kenya and Ethiopia, says livestock play a critical role in income generation, job creation, gender equity, food production and many other means to improve people's lives.

Djikeng says the focus of CTLGH's efforts is to improve the livestock production systems of smallholder farmers living in low- and middle-income countries, who generally farm less than two hectares and are among the poorest and most marginalized communities.

Djikeng says through the genetics work, smallholder farmers will be able to own animals that are better adapted, more resilient, healthier and able to reach their production potential.

"These animals are less also likely to incur extra inputs, due to poor health or inefficient feed conversion, for the farmers who own them and help mitigate climate change," he said, "Enhancing nutrition through the access to milk, meat and eggs is vital to improve human health and even more critical for infants in their first 1,000 days of life."

Djikeng says his long-standing research interests are centered on genomics, the study of genes and their functions, and specifically on livestock genomics.

"For the last 10 years I have been particularly interested in how genomics can be used to assess and exploit genetic diversity in order to address key agricultural productivity and sustainability challenges, with a focus on farmed animals and crops," he said.

"Our work is not about developing new breeds, " he said, adding that the goal to ensure that existing breeds are more resilient, productive and environmentally sustainable and are able to perform optimally in tropical production systems."

Djikeng believes a reasonable business model for tropical livestock development would be one where a systems approach is considered.

"Under such a model, an important consideration of livestock development must be given on its impact on the environment, deforestation, etcetera," he said, "This is an area where government regulation and incentives should be explored."

Cattle in the village of Idool, near Ngaoundere, Cameroon, Central Africa, Africa

Djikeng says his current work is heavily influenced by growing up in a household economically dependent on small-scale agriculture.

"I was born and grew up in small village in western (French-speaking) Cameroon," he said, adding that his parents farmed on a small piece of land and owned chickens and pigs as assets for income generation.

"You can imagine how very vulnerable my familys situation was, relying on three or four pigs and about 10 chickens to support a range of needs including education and healthcare for myself and my siblings," he said, "Growing up, I wanted to find a job that would give me a stable income so that I did not end up a subsistence farmer like my parents before me."

With the support of his family, he was able to complete his schooling and go to university.

"I wanted to choose a profession that would allow me to support my family and my own parents in the future, so studying medicine was my first option but I realized that advanced biological sciences would be a better path for me," he said, "It was when studying for my PhD that I realized the important link between agricultural development and human health which has led me to work in this area for close to 20 years now."

Another scientist from Cameroon who is making a big impact is Aristide Takoukam.

When Takoukam was in university, he'd never heard of the African Manatee (Trichechus senegalensis) and he didn't know how to swim, but he would go on to become the first person from Cameroon to earn a PhD studying this endangered mammal.

Takoukam would go on to complete his doctorate and become a National Geographic Explorer and founder of the African Marine Mammal Conservation Organization (AMMCO).

Excerpt from:
This Scientist Is Harnessing The Rich Genetic Diversity Of African Cattle - Forbes

Read More...

Stocks making the biggest moves after the bell: Cal-Maine Foods, Myriad Genetics & more – CNBC

January 9th, 2021 1:49 am

Cases of eggs from Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., await to be handed out by the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce employees to several hundred families along with over 1,400 boxes of meat products from Merchants Foodservice and 2,200 gallons of milk from Borden Dairy, at the Mississippi State Fairgrounds in Jackson, Miss., Aug. 7, 2020.

Rogelio V. Solis | AP

Check out the companies making headlines after the bell on Tuesday:

Cal-Maine Foods Cal-Maine Foods reported a surprise profit for its fiscal second quarter, sending the stock up more than 2% after-hours trading. The company posted earnings per share of 25 cents on revenue of $347.3 million. Analysts polled by FactSet expected a loss of 8 cents pre share on revenue of $333.5 million. The company's egg-dozen sales grew by 4.6% on a year-over-year basis.

Myriad Genetics Shares of the biotechnology company rose nearly 2% on news Myriad will explore "strategic alternatives" for its autoimmune business. The company is also restructuring its international operations.

Smart Global Holdings Smart Global posted fiscal first-quarter earnings per share that were better than expected, lifting the computer-memory manufacturer's stock up by 2.4%. Smart Global reported adjusted earnings per share of 78 cents, topping a FactSet estimate of 70 cents per share. The company also issued better-than-expected revenue guidance for the current quarter.

Nektar Therapeutics Nektar shares slipped about 1% after the company announced Dr. Brian Kotzin will take over as interim chief medical officer, effective immediately, replacing current CMO Wei Lin.

View post:
Stocks making the biggest moves after the bell: Cal-Maine Foods, Myriad Genetics & more - CNBC

Read More...

Fulgent Genetics to Participate in the H.C. Wainwright BIOCONNECT 2021 Conference – GlobeNewswire

January 9th, 2021 1:49 am

TEMPLE CITY, Calif., Jan. 06, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLGT) (Fulgent Genetics or the company), a technology company providing comprehensive testing solutions through its scalable technology platform, today announced that its Chief Financial Officer Paul Kim, and Chief Commercial Officer Brandon Perthuis are scheduled to virtually participate in a presentation at the H.C. Wainwright BIOCONNECT 2021 Conference taking place January 11 to 14, 2021.

A webcast of thepresentation will be available beginning at 6:00 a.m. ET on January 11, 2021 on the Investor Relations section of the Fulgent Genetics website at ir.fulgentgenetics.com, and will be available for 90 days following the conference.

About Fulgent Genetics

Fulgent Genetics proprietary technology platform has created a broad, flexible test menu and the ability to continually expand and improve its proprietary genetic reference library while maintaining accessible pricing, high accuracy and competitive turnaround times. Combining next generation sequencing (NGS) with its technology platform, the Company performs full-gene sequencing with deletion/duplication analysis in an array of panels that can be tailored to meet specific customer needs. In 2019, the Company launched its first patient-initiated product, Picture Genetics, a new line of at-home screening tests that combines the Companys advanced NGS solutions with actionable results and genetic counseling options for individuals. Since March 2020, the Company has commercially launched several tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), including NGS and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) - based tests. The Company has received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the RT-PCR-based tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using upper respiratory specimens (nasal, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal swabs) and for the at-home testing service through Picture Genetics. A cornerstone of the Companys business is its ability to provide expansive options and flexibility for all clients unique testing needs through a comprehensive technology offering including cloud computing, pipeline services, record management, web portal services, clinical workflow, sequencing as a service and automated lab services.

Investor Relations Contacts:The Blueshirt GroupNicole Borsje, 415-217-2633; nicole@blueshirtgroup.com

See the rest here:
Fulgent Genetics to Participate in the H.C. Wainwright BIOCONNECT 2021 Conference - GlobeNewswire

Read More...

Worlwide Animal Genetics Industry to 2027 – Impact Analysis of COVID-19 – PRNewswire

January 9th, 2021 1:49 am

DUBLIN, Jan. 5, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Animal Genetics - Global Market Outlook (2019-2027)" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

According to this report, the Global Animal Genetics market accounted for $4.48 billion in 2019 and is expected to reach $8.60 billion by 2027 growing at a CAGR of 8.5% during the forecast period. Some of the key factors propelling the growth of the market are growing preference for animal protein, increasing population, and increasing adoption of advanced genetic technologies. However, the shortage of skilled veterinary research professionals is the restraining factor for the growth of the market.

Animal genetics is the study of heredity in animals. It includes the study of colour, genetics, gene expression, and animal breeding for a wide variety of applications and is primarily focused on the passing of traits from one generation to the next.

By live animal, the porcine segment is expected to grow at a significant market share during the forecast period owing to the large consumer base for pork meat, as well as growing penetration of advanced genetic research. Based on geography, North America is anticipated to hold considerable market share during the forecast period which is attributed to the research activities being carried out on animal genetics and the adoption of strategic activities by industry players.

Some of the key players in Animal Genetics Market include Animal Genetics Inc, Cogent, Crv Holding B.V., Alta Genetics Inc, Genus PLC, Neogen Corporation, Inguran LLC, Groupe Grimaud La Corbiere SA, Hendrix Genetics BV, Topigs Norsvin, Vetgen, Ew Group GmbH, Zoetis Inc, Envigo Inc, and Urus.

What the Report offers:

Key Topics Covered:

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface2.1 Abstract 2.2 Stake Holders 2.3 Research Scope 2.4 Research Methodology 2.4.1 Data Mining 2.4.2 Data Analysis 2.4.3 Data Validation 2.4.4 Research Approach 2.5 Research Sources 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Drivers 3.3 Restraints 3.4 Opportunities 3.5 Threats 3.6 End User Analysis 3.7 Emerging Markets 3.8 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers 4.3 Threat of substitutes 4.4 Threat of new entrants 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Animal Genetics Market, By Live Animal 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Canine 5.3 Avian 5.4 Piscine 5.5 Poultry 5.6 Bovine 5.7 Porcine 5.8 Other Live Animals 5.8.1 Goat 5.8.2 Horse 5.8.3 Sheep

6 Global Animal Genetics Market, By Service 6.1 Introduction 6.2 DNA Typing 6.3 Genetic Disease Tests 6.4 Genetic Trait Tests 6.5 DNA Testing 6.6 Other Services 6.6.1 Forensic Testing 6.6.2 Prenatal Testing 6.6.3 Predictive and Presymptomatic Testing 6.6.4 Diagnostic Testing

7 Global Animal Genetics Market, By Genetic Material 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Embryos 7.2.1 Equine Embryos 7.2.2 Bovine Embryos 7.2.3 Other Animal Embryos 7.2.3.1 Porcine Embryos 7.2.3.2 Sheep Embryos 7.2.3.3 Goat Embryos 7.3 Semen 7.3.1 Canine Semen 7.3.2 Porcine Semen 7.3.3 Bovine Semen 7.3.4 Equine Semen 7.3.5 Other Animal Semen 7.3.5.1 Goat Semen 7.3.5.2 Sheep Semen

8 Global Animal Genetics Market, By End User 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Veterinary Hospitals & Clinics 8.3 Research Centers and Institutes 8.4 Diagnostic Centres

9 Global Animal Genetics Market, By Geography 9.1 Introduction 9.2 North America 9.2.1 US 9.2.2 Canada 9.2.3 Mexico 9.3 Europe 9.3.1 Germany 9.3.2 UK 9.3.3 Italy 9.3.4 France 9.3.5 Spain 9.3.6 Rest of Europe 9.4 Asia Pacific 9.4.1 Japan 9.4.2 China 9.4.3 India 9.4.4 Australia 9.4.5 New Zealand 9.4.6 South Korea 9.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific 9.5 South America 9.5.1 Argentina 9.5.2 Brazil 9.5.3 Chile 9.5.4 Rest of South America 9.6 Middle East & Africa 9.6.1 Saudi Arabia 9.6.2 UAE 9.6.3 Qatar 9.6.4 South Africa 9.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

10 Key Developments10.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures 10.2 Acquisitions & Mergers 10.3 New Product Launch 10.4 Expansions 10.5 Other Key Strategies

11 Company Profiling11.1 Animal Genetics Inc 11.2 Cogent 11.3 Crv Holding B.V. 11.4 Alta Genetics Inc 11.5 Genus PLC 11.6 Neogen Corporation 11.7 Inguran LLC 11.8 Groupe Grimaud La Corbiere SA 11.9 Hendrix Genetics BV 11.10 Topigs Norsvin 11.11 Vetgen 11.12 Ew Group GmbH 11.13 Zoetis Inc 11.14 Envigo Inc 11.15 Urus

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/gk37es

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

Read this article:
Worlwide Animal Genetics Industry to 2027 - Impact Analysis of COVID-19 - PRNewswire

Read More...

Cow production improved by genetic research and tech – Rural News Group

January 9th, 2021 1:49 am

Livestock Improvement Corporation (LIC) say continued investment in gene discovery and genetic analysis technology is allowing their farmer shareholders to improve cow production valued in the millions.

Investment into the understanding of bovine genetics undertaken by LIC scientists indicates farmers could be missing out on production to the tune of up to the tune of up to $10 million each year.

The co-operative spent $16 million on research and development during the 2019/20 season.

The discovery of genetic variations have been made from the farmer-owned co-operative's database of genotyped cows and bulls and validated through on-farm inspections.

LIC chief scientist Richard Spelman says that despite a relatively low frequently, the hidden impacts on production from these variants can be substantial.

Spelman says they are recessive genetic variations, which means an animal has to have two copies to be affected.

"Identifying these animals via Genemark and removing them from the herd as calves will save in lost production and the rearing cost for these animals.

"We estimate this could be worth up to $10 million in lost production each year across the national herd," he says.

"Even having a few of these cows in a herd could equate to significant loss in productivity and profitability."

He says that LIC's continued investment in gene discovery, with the Genemark testing platform, will allow farmers to identify genetic variations in animals as calves, remove them from the herd, and allow them to focus on the rest of their replacements.

Each of the variants exist within the national herd at differing frequencies and all have varying effects on an animal's production.

From spring 2021, all farmers using LIC's Genemark services will automotically be notified at no additional charge if any of their calves are affected by any of the variations.

"We are pleased our combined investment into science and technology has come together to deliver a simple and convenient service for farmers that is likely to save millions in lost production."

Go here to see the original:
Cow production improved by genetic research and tech - Rural News Group

Read More...

Plague may have caused die-offs of ancient Siberians – Science News

January 9th, 2021 1:49 am

Ancient people brought the plague to Siberia by about 4,400 years ago, which may have led to collapses in the population there, a new genetic analysis suggests.

That preliminary finding raises the possibility that plague-induced die offs influenced the genetic structure of northeast Asians who trekked to North America starting perhaps 5,500 years ago. If the result holds up, it, along with other newly uncovered insights into human population dynamics in the region, would unveil a more complex ancestry among those ancient travelers than has usually been assumed.

A team led by evolutionary geneticists Glah Merve Kilin and Anders Gtherstrm, both of Stockholm University, extracted DNA from the remains of 40 human skeletons previously excavated in parts of eastern Siberia. Among those samples, DNA from Yersinia pestis, the bacterium that causes plague, was found in two ancient Siberians, the researchers report January 6 in Science Advances. One person lived around 4,400 years ago. The other dated to roughly 3,800 years ago.

Its unclear how the plague bacterium first reached Siberia or whether it caused widespread infections and death, Gtherstrm says. But he and his colleagues found that genetic diversity in their ancient samples of human DNA declined sharply from around 4,700 to 4,400 years ago, possibly the result of population collapse.

Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your inbox

The new data coincide with evidence reported in June 2020 in Cell of Y. pestis DNA in two ancient individuals from eastern Siberias Lake Baikal region, dating to around 4,500 years ago.

The plague may well have reached Siberia by roughly 4,500 years ago, at a time when Y. pestis infected people inhabiting other parts of Eurasia (SN: 10/22/15), says evolutionary geneticist Hendrik Poinar of McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada who did not participate in the new study.

But its possible that the ancient Siberians were infected with a version of Y. pestis that wasnt virulent. If so, the bacterium wouldnt have killed enough people to alter the genetic structure of Siberians. Genetic data from only two individuals provides too little evidence to confirm that they possessed a virulent strain of Y. pestis, Poinar says.

The genetic findings do provide a glimpse of a series of previously unknown ancient population shifts in that region. Ancient individuals included in the new research dated from around 16,900 years ago, shortly after the last Ice Age peaked, to 550 years ago. The researchers compared those ancient Siberians DNA to DNA from present-day humans in different parts of the world and to previous samples of ancient human DNA mainly from Europe, Asia and North America. The analyses showed that despite Siberias harsh climate, groups near Lake Baikal and regions further east mixed with various populations in and outside of Siberia from the Late Stone Age up to medieval times.

The two plague-carrying Siberians, in particular, came from regions that had experienced major population transformations during much of the sampled time period, the researchers say. Those events could have included migrations of plague-carrying people from outside Siberia. For instance, the 4,400-year-old skeleton was found just west of Lake Baikal, a region that witnessed the emergence of several distinct genetic groups with roots mainly further to the west and southwest of Lake Baikal between around 8,980 and 560 years ago.

See the original post:
Plague may have caused die-offs of ancient Siberians - Science News

Read More...

Uncovering the social factors lurking within diabetes risk – UC Santa Cruz

January 5th, 2021 1:52 am

For assistant professor of sociology James Doucet-Battle, diabetes research is personal. His grandmother was diabetic, and thats part of what inspired him to delve into the issue through the lens of African American experience.

Im interested in this notion that there is a racial component to risk for type 2 diabetes, he said. I wanted to unpack the ways in which African Americansand, increasingly, Latino peopleare held up as examples of high-risk type 2 diabetes populations.

Diabetes is a medical condition that affects the bodys ability to regulate blood sugar levels, and in type 2 diabetes, cells become resistant to insulin, the hormone produced in the pancreas that normally helps cells convert blood sugar into energy. African American people are far more likely to develop type 2 diabetes than white Americans. But why? And what are the effects of this disparity?

These are some of the questions that Doucet-Battle wanted to explore. And now, his new book, Sweetness in the Blood: Race, Risk, and Type 2 Diabetes, captures findings from that journey in a way that challenges assumptions about race within diabetes research.

For the first phase of the project, Doucet-Battle studied how African American populations with diabetes interact with researchers, healthcare professionals, and diabetes technologies, like glucometers. In particular, he wanted to uncover how the history of racism in the United States has affected trust between African American communities and biomedical researchers.

Doucet-Battle also studied a Silicon Valley-based biotechnology companys efforts to design a diabetes risk algorithm and examined how they navigated race in projecting health outcomes. The company had sought out an African American test group and a group of participants from Mauritius, in the Indian Ocean. It struck Doucet-Battle that both Mauritius and parts of the United States were once sugar colonies. That launched him into a study of how the global geography of diabetes reflects the history of colonialism and slavery.

He also worked with epidemiologists, molecular biologists, and genomicists across the country to look for diabetes risk factors in mitochondrial DNA, a maternally inherited chromosome that plays an important role in human metabolic adaptation to environmental change. Through this workspurred by the 2013 mapping of the genome and epigenome of the maternally derived HeLa cells of Henrietta Lackshe demonstrates the importance of analyzing gender before attempting to examine the social construct of race.

Ultimately, Doucet-Battle says researchers who want to better understand diabetes risk should focus more attention on social factors, because risk is as socially, culturally, politically, and economically created as it is biologically.

For example, he explained that type 2 diabetes is strongly associated with body weight, and many type 2 diabetics may be able to reduce or eliminate their dependence on medication through diet and exercise. Similarly, those who are prediabetic could reduce their risk of developing the disease. However, Doucet-Battle notes that the cultural and economic impulses in this country are mitigating against that. And one of those factors is inequality in access to physical activity.

While we can stay relatively healthy here in Santa Cruz County walking up and down the verdant hills of the Central Coast, for a lot of people, getting that recommended 180 minutes of aerobic exercise per week is quite a challenge, he said. Particularly when youre living in resource-deprived, unsafe, or aesthetically challenging areas.

In his future research, Doucet-Battle wants to continue exploring how barriers to physical activity affect diabetes risk and treatment outcomes. Hes particularly interested in taking a regional look at how COVID-19 lockdowns and poor air quality during Californias 2020 wildfire season have affected the lives of diabetics. To study this, hes assembling a team of UC Santa Cruz undergraduate researchers, with funding from the Building Belonging program administered by the Institute for Social Transformation.

Overall, when he looks back at the experience of writing Sweetness In The Blood, Doucet-Battle says it has helped him visualize the intersection of race, gender, history, and scientific knowledge production in new ways that will have a lasting effect on his approach to research.

I came into this project as a medical anthropologist, he said. I came out of it as a social scientist of science.

Link:
Uncovering the social factors lurking within diabetes risk - UC Santa Cruz

Read More...

Lisa La on the Impact of Diabetes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma – Cancer Network

January 5th, 2021 1:52 am

The director of clinical research in the Center for Cancer Care at White Plains Hospital spoke about the implications of a study which evaluated the impact of diabetes in patients with multiple myeloma.

A descriptive analysis of the Connect MM Registry (NCT01081028), a disease registry for patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma, presented at the 2020 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition revealed an unmet need related to providing better supportive care for diabetes management in patients with this hematologic malignancy.

In an interview with CancerNetwork, Lisa La, director of clinical research in the Center for Cancer Care at White Plains Hospital, discussed the implications of these study results and what she believes they point to regarding research moving forward.

Transcription:

Its always been known in the clinic that patients [with diabetes] possibly had worse overall survival and progression-free survival, but there wasnt a lot of data to prove that. Now that we have [those] data, whats next? Its really [about] providing the patients with more supportive care.

What does that mean? It could mean a lot of different things to a lot of different centerssuch as providing them with [a dedicated] clinician to handle and better manage their diabetes, weight management, healthy eating, [and] following up on them. Ive been doing some preliminary analysis on taking the next steps.

What other data Im interested in after looking at these general findings were [whether or not] race plays a role? Do steroids play a role? We know in myeloma, steroids are a big backbone for all of our treatments in general. And does that play a role in why patients [with diabetes] did not have a fair advantage of getting the same treatment options as those without diabetes just because of their comorbidities?

So, there are a lot of interesting findings. When the data were presented, there was a lot of excitement. Whats the next step? Can we look at race? Can we do subgroup analyses? What about the [patients going to] transplant? There are a lot of things that we can look at from this data.

Reference:

La L, Jagannath S, Ailawadhi S, et al. Clinical features and survival outcomes in diabetic patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) enrolled in the Connect MM Registry. Blood. 2020;136(suppl 1):49-50. doi:10.1182/blood-2020-137309.

Here is the original post:
Lisa La on the Impact of Diabetes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma - Cancer Network

Read More...

Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of critical respiratory illness in patients COVID-19 in a community hospital – DocWire News

January 5th, 2021 1:52 am

This article was originally published here

Obes Med. 2020 Dec 30:100316. doi: 10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100316. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the leading non-communicable disease worldwide and is associated with several microvascular and macrovascular complications. Individuals with T2D are more prone to acquiring selected types of infections and are more susceptible to complications due to these infections. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between T2D and COVID-19 in the community setting.

METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis that included 147 adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to a community hospital. Demographics, medical history, symptoms and signs, laboratory findings, complications during the hospital course, and treatments were collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the probability of intubation in patients with T2D as compared with patients without T2D. The hazard ratio for intubation in the survival analysis was estimated using a bivariable Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS: Of 147 patients, 73 (49.7%) had a history of T2D. Patients with T2D had higher requirement of ICU admission (31.5% vs 12.2%; p=.004), higher incidence of ARDS (35.6% vs 16.2%, p=.007), higher rates of intubation (32.9% vs 12.2%, p=0.003), and higher use neuromuscular blocking agents (23.3% vs 9.5%, p=.02). In the survival analysis at 28 days of follow-up, patients with T2D showed an increased hazard for intubation (HR 3.00; 95% CI, 1.39 to 6.46).

CONCLUSION: In our patient population, patients with COVID-19 and T2D showed significantly higher ARDS incidence and intubation rates. The survival analysis also showed that after 28 days of follow-up, patients with T2D presented an increased risk for shorter time to intubation.

PMID:33392411 | PMC:PMC7772088 | DOI:10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100316

Read more here:
Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of critical respiratory illness in patients COVID-19 in a community hospital - DocWire News

Read More...

Page 235«..1020..234235236237..240250..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick