header logo image


Page 1,370«..1020..1,3691,3701,3711,372..1,3801,390..»

Stem cell therapy True or fiction Dr. Ahmed korie alexandria university – Video

December 18th, 2012 5:44 am


Stem cell therapy True or fiction Dr. Ahmed korie alexandria university
Stem cell therapy True or fiction Dr. Ahmed korie alexandria universityFrom:mansvuViews:2 0ratingsTime:29:49More inEducation

Read the original post:
Stem cell therapy True or fiction Dr. Ahmed korie alexandria university - Video

Read More...

Stem Cell’s explained part 1 on The Susana Kennedy Show on 2oceansvibe – Video

December 18th, 2012 5:44 am


Stem Cell #39;s explained part 1 on The Susana Kennedy Show on 2oceansvibe
My ever increasing curiosity with the possibilities of Stem Cell therapy recently led me to meeting up with Dr. Duncan Carmichael from The Anti-Aging Clinic in Cape town, we chatted about what stem cell #39;s are, what some of the possibilities are and more, this is part one of a series of interviews I will be releasing over the next few weeks, demystifying the myths and revealing the incredible possibilities that are actually already available to you all right now. Enjoy!From:Susana KennedyViews:1 0ratingsTime:08:32More inScience Technology

Continue reading here:
Stem Cell's explained part 1 on The Susana Kennedy Show on 2oceansvibe - Video

Read More...

BrainStorm and Octane to Develop Revolutionary Bioreactor-Based NurOwn Stem Cells Production Process

December 18th, 2012 5:44 am

NEW YORK & PETACH TIKVAH, Israel--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics (BCLI), a leading developer of adult stem cell technologies for neurodegenerative diseases, announced today that it has signed an agreement with Octane Biotech of Kingston, Ontario, to jointly develop a proprietary bioreactor for production of its NurOwn stem cell therapy candidate. The customized bioreactor will enable BrainStorm to optimize its NurOwn production process, significantly increasing its production capabilities by using a single clean room for multiple patients, reducing costs and time. The project is supported by a grant awarded by the Canada-Israel Industrial Research and Development Foundation (CIIRDF).

Under the terms of the agreement, the companies will develop a commercially viable, safe, reliable, and cost-effective bioreactor for scale-up of BrainStorms NurOwn stem cell therapy, using Octanes Automated Cell & Tissue Engineering System (ACTES) technology. The CIIRDF funding award was approved for a period of three years.

Octane is the ideal partner for us, since they have a particular expertise in developing automated production processes for mesenchymal cell therapy technologies, commented Dr. Adrian Harel, BrainStorms CEO. We are anxious to move ahead with this project, in order to be in a position to provide NurOwn as quickly as possible, and to as many patients as possible, in the near future.

The opportunity to work with BrainStorm on scaling-up the NurOwn production process is a particularly meaningful one, given the urgency of its target population, said Dr. Tim Smith, Octanes CEO. We are confident that our combined knowledge base and commitment to the project will help advance their product significantly closer to clinical use.

BrainStorm is currently conducting a Phase I/II clinical trial in ALS patients at the Hadassah Medical Center in Jerusalem and is planning to expand its clinical development in the USA, pending FDA approval. Towards that goal, the Company has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the University of Massachusetts Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital to begin ALS human clinical trials at these institutions.

About BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics

BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. is a biotechnology company engaged in the development of first-of-its-kind adult stem cell therapies derived from autologous bone marrow cells for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The Company holds the rights to develop and commercialize its NurOwn technology through an exclusive, worldwide licensing agreement with Ramot, the technology transfer company of Tel Aviv University. For more information, visit the companys website at http://www.brainstorm-cell.com.

About Octane Biotech

Octane develops innovative bioreactor-based systems to meet the production challenges inherent in the progressive scale-up of manual cell culture protocols. The companys unique Automated Cell & Tissue Engineering System (ACTES) solution integrates state-of-the-art bioreactors, biosensors and bioprocessing to enable routine GMP production of cell-based products for clinical therapeutics. Octane Biotech Inc. is one of three affiliated companies within the Octane Medical Group. For more information, visit the companys website at http://www.octaneco.com.

Continued here:
BrainStorm and Octane to Develop Revolutionary Bioreactor-Based NurOwn Stem Cells Production Process

Read More...

Stem cells and Diabetes – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells and Diabetes
Song- I remember, by Deadmau5 KaskadeFrom:mastercheef524Views:0 0ratingsTime:01:06More inPeople Blogs

More here:
Stem cells and Diabetes - Video

Read More...

Stem Cells Research Commercial – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem Cells Research Commercial
For this biology project we had to choose a side on whether if we were for or against putting a stem cell research facility in our home town. We were for the cause and this is our commercial which is supposed to persuade the viewer to vote yes to the fictional #39;question 6 #39;.From:iamtrroyViews:0 0ratingsTime:02:01More inPeople Blogs

Originally posted here:
Stem Cells Research Commercial - Video

Read More...

Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University
Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo UniversityFrom:mansvuViews:2 0ratingsTime:29:32More inEducation

Follow this link:
Stem cells and desensitization in renal transplantation. Prof. Gamal saadi. Cairo University - Video

Read More...

Stem cells and renal regeneration Dr. Amal Ibrahim. Alazhar university – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells and renal regeneration Dr. Amal Ibrahim. Alazhar university
Stem cells and renal regeneration Dr. Amal Ibrahim. Alazhar universityFrom:mansvuViews:2 0ratingsTime:09:50More inEducation

See the rest here:
Stem cells and renal regeneration Dr. Amal Ibrahim. Alazhar university - Video

Read More...

Stem cells in clinical trials. Prof. Hala ElWakil. Alexandria University – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells in clinical trials. Prof. Hala ElWakil. Alexandria University
Stem cells in clinical trials. Prof. Hala ElWakil. Alexandria UniversityFrom:mansvuViews:1 0ratingsTime:27:12More inEducation

Read the original post:
Stem cells in clinical trials. Prof. Hala ElWakil. Alexandria University - Video

Read More...

Stem cells therpy in Urology. Prof. yasser Osman. mansoura University – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells therpy in Urology. Prof. yasser Osman. mansoura University
Stem cells therpy in Urology. Prof. yasser Osman. mansoura UniversityFrom:mansvuViews:1 0ratingsTime:25:36More inEducation

More:
Stem cells therpy in Urology. Prof. yasser Osman. mansoura University - Video

Read More...

Stem cells migrating on the aligned fibers – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells migrating on the aligned fibers
Stem cells spreading on aligned electrospun nanofibersFrom:shaoping zhongViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:15More inPeople Blogs

See original here:
Stem cells migrating on the aligned fibers - Video

Read More...

Stem cells attached and spread onto the aligned fibers – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem cells attached and spread onto the aligned fibers
From:shaoping zhongViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:12More inPeople Blogs

Read the original post:
Stem cells attached and spread onto the aligned fibers - Video

Read More...

Stem Cells Technology – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


Stem Cells Technology
The science of stem cells Dr. Nathan Newman, a world-renowned dermatologist and cosmetic surgeon, began searching for a topical treatment to help patients recovering from burns and severe injuries. Knowing that stem cells drive cell growth and regeneration, he isolated the stem cell growth factors that serve as the "language" communicating cellular activity. Although other scientists were using plant-based growth factors, Dr. Newman derived his growth factors from the stem cells of healthy adults, theorizing that cell communication in the same "language" would be more effective. The power behind LUMINESCE trade; The results were remarkable. And his 200+ growth factor complex is what you #39;ll experience in LUMINESCE trade; products from Jeunesse. This potent growth factor complex is able to rejuvenate skin cells faster and at a molecular level. New cell production is stimulated, resulting in increased collagen and elastin for firmer skin tone. New cells also give your complexion a fuller appearance with a healthy, vibrant glow. With LUMINESCE trade;, skin appears younger, because at the cellular level, it literally is younger.From:Mark CyrzanViews:0 0ratingsTime:03:36More inScience Technology

Read more:
Stem Cells Technology - Video

Read More...

"Study of Human Neural Stem Cells in Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury" – Stephen Huhn, MD – Video

December 18th, 2012 2:44 am


"Study of Human Neural Stem Cells in Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury" - Stephen Huhn, MD
Dr. Huhn, who is Vice President, Head of the CNS Program at Stem Cells, Inc., provides an update on the company #39;s clinical trial.From:unite2fightparalysisViews:0 0ratingsTime:23:03More inNonprofits Activism

Read more:
"Study of Human Neural Stem Cells in Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury" - Stephen Huhn, MD - Video

Read More...

Stem Cells En Mpg4 – Video

December 16th, 2012 6:44 pm


Stem Cells En Mpg4
Stem cell technology is a rapidly developing field that combines the efforts of cell biologists, geneticists, and clinicians and offers hope of effective treatment for a variety of malignant and non-malignant diseases.From:Kasia SowackiViews:0 0ratingsTime:03:36More inScience Technology

View original post here:
Stem Cells En Mpg4 - Video

Read More...

The ROI on pant-wearing and other social media tips

December 16th, 2012 8:02 am
Tweet 

With many things in life, there is a payoff for doing them.  Do the dishes and the kitchen is cleaner, your household is more functional, and hopefully one or more family members notice and appreciate you for it.



For other things, however,  the people around you have such high expectations you'll do them that you only lose points if you don't but gain very little if you do.  For you, this may be true of the dishes.  Certainly I've always maintained this is true for Valentine's Day.  Get flowers and you simply maintain the relationship's status quo; fail to do anything and you lose big points fast.  


Similarly, at some point certain things become so ubiquitous that they are expected as a baseline.  This is true of putting on your pants.

The global head of social media for Ford Motor Company, Scott Monty, once asked, "What's the ROI* of putting your pants on in the morning?".   The truth is that there is very little benefit to putting on your pants other than to avoid the significant cost of not doing so.

Certainly this is true now of having a website or an email address for your company.  Unlike a couple decades ago, no company gets kudos for having a website or email addresses but it would certainly raise eyebrows of criticism if your company failed to have them.

Arguably social media participation is not quite there yet but it is, I submit, fast approaching.  Someday in the not-too-distant future you will receive the cringe of shame if your company is not active in the leading social media platforms of the day.  Today - for companies - these are LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.  This will be true irrespective of whether yours is a B2B or B2C company.
Recently I was invited to write an article for Future Medicine's special issue for the World Stem Cell Report.  I was asked to make the case for why and how participating in social media stood to benefit the scientists, companies, executives, employees, academics, activists, and other stakeholders in the cell therapy industry.  

The result is "Why the stem cell sector must engage with social media".  What I attempted to succinctly outline are the ways social media primarily benefit one's career and organization or company.


"I can tell you without the slightest hesitation of conviction – having experienced it myself and seen it repeated countless times – is that active and successful social media engagement translates into:

  • Unparalleled learning: accessing more information relevant to your discipline, specialty and company than you otherwise will. 
  • Enhanced profile: higher profile within your industry, profession, specialty and community. Social media is not the only way to build a profile but it can be very effective.
  • Wider network: more touch points and meaningful relationships with people than you otherwise will accomplish by any other means combined."
The measurable impacts and benefits are real and certainly include:
  • Traffic: "For companies, increased traffic equals increased opportunity to call readers/viewers to your intended action – interaction, citation, linking, investing, buying or engaging in some other action you solicit. For individual professionals, increased viewers translate into more chances for collaboration, citation, engagement, etc."
  • Collaboration: "There is an intrinsic correlation between one’s profile and the opportunities one has for collaboration. For companies this means finding the right partnerships, joint ventures, strategic alliances, collaborators, employees, management and so on. For individual professionals, this means more and/or better quality invites to speak, write or collaborate in other ways. It also means finding quality grad students, faculty, employees and interns
  • Revenue/IncomeThis is about translating a broader knowledge base and a wider network over which you have some level of influence (if only just that they are listening) into more money for your company, organization and yourself. For companies, this means finding the right partners, investors, customers and so on. For organizations this means finding the right donors, impressing the right grant reviewers and/or recruiting the right rain-maker faculty. For individual professionals this translates into promotions or job offers."

As I conclude my article I will conclude here:

    "In order to create the kinds of perceptions and solicit the kinds of actions we want from the world around us, we must engage the world around us. The world around us is engaging online. 

    For all kinds of selfish and selfless reasons you, your company or organization and your career will benefit from you engaging there too."

    and this prediction:

    "...in less than the blink it took for the commercial world to accept websites and email, it will seem similarly ridiculous for professionals, academics and companies to operate and succeed without actively using social media."

    ____________


    If this topic is of interest to you, here are some great resources particularly focused on the value of social media to those in life sciences.


    Canaday, M. Is Life Science Social Media Worth It Yet? Three Tenets Behind Its Relevance To Your Business. Comprendia. 6 December 2012. 


    Bersenev A. Scientific blogging as a model for professional networking online. Cellular Therapy and Transplantation. 2010;2(7). 10.3205/ctt-2010-en-000084.01. 


    Bersenev, A. Scientific blogging as a model for professional networking online. 4 August 2010. StemCellAssays.com 


    Bersenev, A. Who’s Who in the Stem Cell Blogosophere.  27 June 2011. StemCellAssays.com 


    Bishop, D.  How to bury your academic writing. Bishop’s Blog. 26 August 2012. 



    Buckler, L. If You’re Breathing, You’re in PR. Cell Therapy Blog. 11 June 2010.  

    Buckler, L. Don’t feel the pain of ignoring social media? Just wait a minute…. CellTherapyBlog.com 22 October 2008.    

    Jewell, T. Survey: How our scientists use social media. AZHealthConnections.com. 12 February 2012. 


    Knoepfer, P. Top ten tips for blogging for scientists. 2 August 2012. IPScell.com   


    Shipman, M. Why Scientists Should Publicize Their Findings – for Purely Selfish Reasons. Scientific America. Blog. 18 June 2012. 
         
    Shipman, M. A gentle introduction to Twitter for the apprehensive academic. Scientific America. Blog.  14 June 2011.  


    Small, G. Time to Tweet. Nature 2011. 479 141 2 November 2011 


    Wilcox, C. Social Media for Scientists Part 1: It’s Our Job. Scientific American Blog. 27 September 2011.  


    Wilcox, C. Social Media for Scientists Part 2: You Do Have time. Scientific American Blog. 29 September 2011.  


    Wilcox, C. Social Media for Scientists Part 3: Win-Win. Scientific American Blog. 10 October 2011.  

    Wilcox, C. Guest Editorial: It’s time to e-Volve. Taking Responsibility for Science Communication in a Digital Age. Biol Bull. 22285-87. (April 2012)  

    The Rules of Social Media.  Fast Company.  8 August 2012. 


    http://www.celltherapyblog.com hosted by http://www.celltherapygroup.com

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/k7ANTnLXNjc/the-roi-on-pant-wearing-and-other.html

    Read More...

    A proposed 6-step platform for the cell therapy industry to consider in combating non-compliant cell therapy treatments

    December 16th, 2012 8:02 am
    Tweet 


    Further to my recent post, "Six steps to fighting non-compliant cell therapy treatments. The stuff of grey shades, spades, ivory towers and (ahem) balls.", I have crafted a 6-point platform that I propose to submit (with potential edits based on preliminary feedback) to several of the leading  industry and professional organizations for their consideration including ARM, ISCT, ISSCR, FACTAABB  ICMS, and perhaps, in due course, to patient groups, physician groups, disease-specific professional organizations (e.g, cardiology, oncology, neurology, cosmetic, etc).



    I welcome comments and feedback. 


    1. In addition to helping patients distinguish between compliant and non-compliant treatments (and providers) we must do more to help patients distinguish between non-compliant cell therapy treatments (and providers) which are more or less risky. 


    2. Whatever we do in response to this issue should be done with an eye to being practical and helpful to patients in the real-life context of their decision about whether or not to buy a non-complaint cell therapy.


    3. Our response to this issue should be based on a risk-based approach recognizing that not all non-compliance is created equal.  We should create a framework for risk-based analysis (both for us and our audiences) and focus initiatives around those which present the highest risk.


    4. We recognize the problem of non-compliant cell therapies is not just a problem that exists in jurisdictions with little, no, or poor regulation but that is a growing problem even in the most highly regulated jurisdictions meaning the solution cannot be regulated it depends on education and enforcement.


    5. We recognize regulatory agencies cannot enforce non-compliance on their own.  We as an industry need to complement their efforts through our own standards and enforcement.


    6. Stakeholder groups should support the formation of a multi-organizational  initiative to, based on a risk-based assessment, spotlight the categories or signs of highest-risk offenders for use by patients and/or their physicians in identifying  whether or not treatments (and providers) they may be considering fall into the that category associated with the highest level of risk.


    What do you think?

    http://www.celltherapyblog.com hosted by http://www.celltherapygroup.com

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/wkSMxAV9938/a-proposed-6-step-platform-for-cell.html

    Read More...

    Two More Editorials: The California Stem Cell Agency Should Heed IOM Recommendations for Reform

    December 16th, 2012 8:02 am

    Two other major California newspapers
    today said the $3 billion California stem cell agency needs to “clean
    up its act” if it wants to be successful in continuing its efforts
    at turning stem cells into cures.

    The editorials appeared in the Los Angeles
    Times
    , the state's largest circulation newspaper at more than
    700,000, and the San Jose Mercury News in California's Silicon Valley.
    The Mercury News has a reported circulation of nearly 600,000,
    although that figure includes other Bay Area newspaper owned by the
    same chain.
    Both editorials focused on the 17-month evaluation of the agency by the prestigious Institute of Medicine (IOM) as did earlier editorials in The Sacramento Bee and the San Francisco Chronicle. The IOM recommended sweeping reforms at the agency that would alter its structure and target conflicts of interest. 
    The Times said,

    “The $700,000 spent on the
    study...will be wasted if the institute's oversight board fails to
    heed the (IOM) committee's
    criticisms,
     which echo the findings of the Little Hoover
    Commission
    and other groups over the years.”

    The editorial continued,

    “The 29-member board is made up
    almost entirely of representatives of advocacy groups and research
    institutions that have a direct interest in how the money is spent.”

    The Times cited the California Stem
    Cell Report'
    s calculations that about 90 percent of the $1.7 billion awarded by CIRM has gone to institutions linked to current and former members of its governing board. 
    The Times noted an award to a Northern California firm that has stirred some criticism. The editorial said,

    “The board also overrode the advice
    of its scientific advisors — twice on a single application when it
    considered a grant for a well-connected company, StemCells Inc. based
    in Newark, Calif. The board granted the company $20 million after Robert Klein, the driving force behind the passage of Proposition 71,
    which created and funded the agency in 2004, and its former head,
    lobbied so intensively for the company that one board member
    described it as 'arm-twisting.'"

    The Times concluded,

    “The agency has used more than half
    of its funding and one day will almost certainly want to ask
    taxpayers for more. It should remember that voters will look for
    evidence of public accountability as well as respected research.”

    The San Jose paper sounded a similar
    note about the agency. Its editorial said,

    “(I)f it wants to survive...it
    should heed the Institute of Medicine's advice to eliminate conflicts
    of interest on its board -- and do it before awarding the remaining
    $1.2 billion of the $3 billion voters approved for stem cell
    research.”

    But the paper said the stem cell agency
    should not be provided any more state funding.

    “Long-term funding was never the
    intent when Proposition 71 passed in 2004. It was supposed to
    kick-start research at a time when federal funding was blocked and to
    establish California as a major player in the rapidly advancing
    medical field. 

    “The agency could continue to bring
    value to the state as an advocate and funder of research, but only if
    it can attract private donors, partners and investors. For that to
    happen, it will need a board that passes the ethics test, with more
    independent experts and industry executives free of conflicts. 

    “At the outset, stem cell advocates
    took immense pride in structuring the agency to keep it relatively
    free of legislative interference despite the use of public money.
    Politicians kept their hands off, which was good. But the agency
    created its own inappropriate influences in the way it constituted
    its board. Now it needs to clean up its act.“

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/hjDmQPb6wDs/two-more-editorials-california-stem.html

    Read More...

    Meager Coverage of Yesterday’s Bristling IOM-CIRM Meeting

    December 16th, 2012 8:02 am

    Mainstream news coverage today was skimpy, to put it mildly, of the testy session yesterday involving the governing board of the California stem
    cell agency and representatives of the prestigious Institute of
    Medicine(IOM).

    Only two pieces appeared, one in the
    San Diego U-T and another on the web site of the Los Angeles Times. Both
    discussed what the Michael Hiltzik of the Times column called “overt hostility” on the
    part of several board members (see yesterday's item here). Bradley
    Fikes
    of the San Diego paper said the patient advocates on the board
    “strongly criticized” the IOM report on the grounds that it
    “unfairly suggests that they have a conflict of interest.”
    One of the recommendations of the IOM
    is that the agency develop ways to manage personal conflicts of
    interest dealing with patient advocates and others at the agency.
    Fikes wrote,

    "'I'm a
    colon cancer survivor,' said Art Torres, vice chairman of the
    oversight committee, and a patient advocate designate. 'Does having
    colon cancer make me biased?'
    Jeff
    Sheehy
    , another patient advocate designate, protested what he called
    a 'defenestration' of patient advocates, whose interests often span
    multiple diseases.”

    Ron Leuty of the San Francisco Business
    Times
    skipped the IOM matter and wrote about the awarding of $36
    million in grants. However, a list of the most popular stories on the
    Business Times web site, ranked as No. 5 Leuty's story last week on the IOM
    study, just below an article about Stanford's $111 million
    concert hall.
    Fikes also had a piece on ViaCyte,
    which is in his area, receiving another $3 million from CIRM.

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/sTuRbsA7d_w/meager-coverage-of-yesterdays-bristling.html

    Read More...

    Appeals at the California Stem Cell Agency: Worthwhile or Worthless?

    December 16th, 2012 8:02 am

    Jon Shestack, a patient advocate member
    of the governing board of the California stem cell agency, weighed in
    today on the virtues of the grant application appeal process at the
    $3 billion research enterprise.

    His remarks came in a “comment”
    filed on the Duchenne item that appeared yesterday on this site. (His
    full comment can be found at the end of that item.)
    Shestack said that the handling of the
    $6 million CIRM grant involving Duchenne research is “a casebook
    study on why the special(extraordinary) petition is worthwhile. There
    was indeed new and relevant information that only became available
    after grant review. Scientific staff and leadership flagged it.”
    The utility of the petitions is one of
    the reasons that we ran the story about Duchenne and the team at
    UCLA. The extraordinary petition process is currently under fire by
    both the Institute of Medicine and the stem cell agency itself, which
    has appointed a task force to come up with changes. But, while the
    petition process is certainly less than perfect, so is the peer
    review/grant review process.
    The Duchenne application is not the
    only “case study.” An application by Karen Aboody of the City of
    Hope
    is often cited as another case. There are undoubtedly others.
    The petition process was adopted
    several years ago by the board as a tool to manage willy-nilly
    appearances of scientists before the CIRM governing board whose
    applications were rejected by reviewers. Now the Institute of
    Medicine has recommended the petitions be abandoned, saying they
    undermine the integrity of grant review process. The IOM cited a
    major controversy in Texas involving its cancer research agency as an
    example of how grant reviews or the lack of them can go bad – not
    to mention conflict of interest problems there. CIRM has already
    started to look for better solutions regarding appeals. Many of its directors
    are troubled by emotional presentations from patients in
    connection with petitions and the lack of adequate information to
    make informed decisions on the spot about the contested matters.
    Whether appeals can be put in a tidy,
    scientific box is debatable. Researchers have the right, under state
    law, to address the board on any issue whatsoever. And at least some
    of them will continue to do so -- regardless of any appeals changes --  when millions of dollars and their
    careers are at stake.
    Opinions and decisions of CIRM
    reviewers are not holy writ. They can and do make mistakes, as we
    all do. In making changes in the appeals process, the goal of the
    agency should be to devise a public and transparent process rather
    than enshroud it in more secrecy. CIRM also should find a way to do
    a much better job of communicating to applicants the availability of
    appeals and precisely how to appeal when it becomes necessary.   

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/ROhqJSUEC28/appeals-at-california-stem-cell-agency.html

    Read More...

    LA Times: On the California Stem Cell Agency and Wasting $700,000

    December 16th, 2012 8:02 am

    The headline on the Los Angeles
    Times
     web site this afternoon read,

    "Is California's stem cell program
    preparing to waste $700,000?"

    The question was raised by Pulitzer
    Prize-winning columnist Michael Hiltzikwhowas commenting on the presentation today by the
    prestigious Institute of Medicine's (IOM) on its sweeping
    recommendations for changes at the state stem cell agency. 
    Hiltzik wrote, 

    "If you're betting that
    the California
    stem cell agency will spurn key recommendations of a
    blue-ribbon review panel that criticized its leadership and
    management structures, you might want to double that bet. Several
    board members showed overt hostility to the panel's recommendations
    during a public meeting today."

    Harold Shapiro, chairman of the IOM
    panel and former president of Princeton University, delivered
    the briefing. The group's study took 17 months and cost the stem cell
    agency $700,000.
    Hiltzik's piece summarized the IOM
    proposals, which echoed many criticisms that have been aired for
    years in California.  Hiltzik wrote, 

    "CIRM Chairman Jonathan
    Thomas
     glided over those issues when he introduced Shapiro.
    Thomas observed that the Institute of Medicine report included many
    statements "validating CIRM, its process, what it was able to
    achieve," which is a bit like launching the investigation of a
    plane crash by focusing on all the planes that land safely every day.
    Thomas did mention that the Institute of Medicine had made numerous
    recommendation about how to "take something which is already a
    great experience and improve it even further." 

    "Shapiro got only a few minutes
    into his presentation before board members started interrupting him
    with objections to the Institute of Medicine's recommendation for a
    majority of independent members."

    Hiltzik concluded, 

    "Thomas promised to stage a public
    workshop on the Institute of Medicine report soon and to subject them
    to 'lengthy discussion.' 

    "Does that sound as if the board
    will be taking seriously the advice that it change the way it does
    business? Stay tuned, but don't hold your breath."

    Source:
    http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/9CY8_m5Reqo/la-times-on-california-stem-cell-agency.html

    Read More...

    Page 1,370«..1020..1,3691,3701,3711,372..1,3801,390..»


    2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
    Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick