header logo image


Page 1,312«..1020..1,3111,3121,3131,314..1,3201,330..»

Streak- Post Stem Cell Therapy Day 9 – Video

May 6th, 2013 1:44 pm


Streak- Post Stem Cell Therapy Day 9
Looking good after moving sheep this morning, taking a morning walk through the woods, an evening walk to the river and generally running amuck with his cani...

By: Laura Hanley

Read the rest here:
Streak- Post Stem Cell Therapy Day 9 - Video

Read More...

What Is Stem Cell Therapy? – Innovations Stem Cell Center – Video

May 5th, 2013 7:43 pm


What Is Stem Cell Therapy? - Innovations Stem Cell Center
http://www.InnovationsStemCellCenter.com 214.699.6948.

By: InnovationsStemCell

See more here:
What Is Stem Cell Therapy? - Innovations Stem Cell Center - Video

Read More...

Exploring the Mind’s Eye: the Regenerative Potentials of Stem Cell Therapy – Video

May 5th, 2013 7:49 am


Exploring the Mind #39;s Eye: the Regenerative Potentials of Stem Cell Therapy
This is done with the purpose of informing you guys about the regenerative potential of stem cell therapy on the eye,

By: fergus chan

See the rest here:
Exploring the Mind's Eye: the Regenerative Potentials of Stem Cell Therapy - Video

Read More...

hESC Research Totals $458 Million out of $1.8 Billion from California Stem Cell Agency

May 5th, 2013 3:11 am

The California stem cell agency today
said that it has awarded $458 million to fund research involving
human embryonic stem cells (hESC) out of a total of $1.8 billion it
has given away during the past eight years.

The amount is of some interest because
the key reason that the agency now exists is the perceived
need in 2004 to fund hESC research in the wake of the Bush
Administration restrictions on federal funding in that area. The
restrictions created a national uproar in the scientific and patient
advocate community, which feared that promising therapies would never
be developed.
The $35 million ballot campaign to
create the agency focused hard on hESC research to the virtual
exclusion of any mention of adult stem cell research. Opposing the
effort were such forces as the anti-abortion movement and the
Catholic church. But this month LifeNews.com carried a mildly
approving item that pointed to the agency's turn towards adult stem
cell research.
When the Obama administration lifted
the Bush restrictions, some questions were raised about the need for
the California effort, which is costing state taxpayers $6 billion,
including interest. But those concerns received little public
attention and quickly died out.
Funding for the agency comes through
state bonds. Cash for new awards is scheduled to run out in 2017. The
agency is looking at developing a public-private effort for thefuture that would need a $50 to $200 million “public investment”
and major private funding.
Amy Adams, CIRM's communications
manager, provided the $458 million figure following publication of
this item yesterday on the California Stem Cell Report.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/iQOiBLaIRNc/hesc-research-totals-458-million-out-of.html

Read More...

‘Praise’ for California Stem Cell Agency from Unlikely Corner

May 5th, 2013 3:11 am

The California stem cell agency this
month received what some might consider a gesture of approval from a
longtime foe – LifeNews.com.

LifeNews is a site devoted to
anti-abortion efforts and information and is sharply opposed to research
involving human embryonic stem cells.
So it was with some surprise that we
read a tacit endorsement of recent CIRM activities in an April 22 piece written by Gene Tame out of Sacramento. It said the most recent
$32 million grant round from CIRM “demonstrates – again – where
the future of stem cell reserch lies.”
Tame wrote,

“CIRM has been steadily moving away
from its original mission to give preferential
treatment
 to funding for human embryonic stem cell research
(hESCR). Instead, after adopting a renewed
emphasis
 on translating research into clinical trials, CIRM
has more and more shifted the bulk of its grants towards funding
research utilizing adult stem cells and other alternatives to hESCR,
such as induced
pluripotent stem cells
 (iPSCs).”

Tame continued,

“(T)he lack, once again, of funding
for hESCR only serves to highlight how old and dated that approach to
finding treatments and cures increasingly seems.”

Tame is correct in his assertion that
the stem cell agency has moved a considerable distance from its
reason for being – research involving human embryonic stem cells.
In 2004, the ballot campaign to create the agency pitched voters hard
on hESC research and made no real mention of adult stem cells.
Instead, it focused on the threat from the Bush Administration with its
restrictions on hESC research, which have been lifted by the Obama
Administration.
.
In 2010, a study by a Georgia Tech
academic, Aaron Levine, reported that through 2009 only 18 percent of California's dollars went for grants that were "clearly" not eligible for federal funding under the Bush restrictions. 
At the date of the study, CIRM had not
publicly disclosed statistics on its funding of hESC research.
Today, however, its web site shows that only about 240 of the 595 awards that it has handed out are going for hESC research. CIRM has not made public the dollar value of
those 240 awards, but it has given away a total of $1.8 billion. (Following publication of this item, the agency told the California Stem Report that it has funded $458 million in hESC research.) 
A footnote: Levine was a member of the
blue-ribbon Institute of Medicine panel that recommended sweeping
changes at CIRM.  

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/hxYse4K5TpU/praise-for-california-stem-cell-agency.html

Read More...

hESC Research Totals $458 Million out of $1.8 Billion from California Stem Cell Agency

May 5th, 2013 3:08 am

The California stem cell agency today
said that it has awarded $458 million to fund research involving
human embryonic stem cells (hESC) out of a total of $1.8 billion it
has given away during the past eight years.

The amount is of some interest because
the key reason that the agency now exists is the perceived
need in 2004 to fund hESC research in the wake of the Bush
Administration restrictions on federal funding in that area. The
restrictions created a national uproar in the scientific and patient
advocate community, which feared that promising therapies would never
be developed.
The $35 million ballot campaign to
create the agency focused hard on hESC research to the virtual
exclusion of any mention of adult stem cell research. Opposing the
effort were such forces as the anti-abortion movement and the
Catholic church. But this month LifeNews.com carried a mildly
approving item that pointed to the agency's turn towards adult stem
cell research.
When the Obama administration lifted
the Bush restrictions, some questions were raised about the need for
the California effort, which is costing state taxpayers $6 billion,
including interest. But those concerns received little public
attention and quickly died out.
Funding for the agency comes through
state bonds. Cash for new awards is scheduled to run out in 2017. The
agency is looking at developing a public-private effort for thefuture that would need a $50 to $200 million “public investment”
and major private funding.
Amy Adams, CIRM's communications
manager, provided the $458 million figure following publication of
this item yesterday on the California Stem Cell Report.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/iQOiBLaIRNc/hesc-research-totals-458-million-out-of.html

Read More...

‘Praise’ for California Stem Cell Agency from Unlikely Corner

May 5th, 2013 3:08 am

The California stem cell agency this
month received what some might consider a gesture of approval from a
longtime foe – LifeNews.com.

LifeNews is a site devoted to
anti-abortion efforts and information and is sharply opposed to research
involving human embryonic stem cells.
So it was with some surprise that we
read a tacit endorsement of recent CIRM activities in an April 22 piece written by Gene Tame out of Sacramento. It said the most recent
$32 million grant round from CIRM “demonstrates – again – where
the future of stem cell reserch lies.”
Tame wrote,

“CIRM has been steadily moving away
from its original mission to give preferential
treatment
 to funding for human embryonic stem cell research
(hESCR). Instead, after adopting a renewed
emphasis
 on translating research into clinical trials, CIRM
has more and more shifted the bulk of its grants towards funding
research utilizing adult stem cells and other alternatives to hESCR,
such as induced
pluripotent stem cells
 (iPSCs).”

Tame continued,

“(T)he lack, once again, of funding
for hESCR only serves to highlight how old and dated that approach to
finding treatments and cures increasingly seems.”

Tame is correct in his assertion that
the stem cell agency has moved a considerable distance from its
reason for being – research involving human embryonic stem cells.
In 2004, the ballot campaign to create the agency pitched voters hard
on hESC research and made no real mention of adult stem cells.
Instead, it focused on the threat from the Bush Administration with its
restrictions on hESC research, which have been lifted by the Obama
Administration.
.
In 2010, a study by a Georgia Tech
academic, Aaron Levine, reported that through 2009 only 18 percent of California's dollars went for grants that were "clearly" not eligible for federal funding under the Bush restrictions. 
At the date of the study, CIRM had not
publicly disclosed statistics on its funding of hESC research.
Today, however, its web site shows that only about 240 of the 595 awards that it has handed out are going for hESC research. CIRM has not made public the dollar value of
those 240 awards, but it has given away a total of $1.8 billion. (Following publication of this item, the agency told the California Stem Report that it has funded $458 million in hESC research.) 
A footnote: Levine was a member of the
blue-ribbon Institute of Medicine panel that recommended sweeping
changes at CIRM.  

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/hxYse4K5TpU/praise-for-california-stem-cell-agency.html

Read More...

Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy for Cystinosis – Video

May 4th, 2013 2:49 am


Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy for Cystinosis
A presentation by Stephanie Cherqui, PhD, University of California, San Diego at the 2013 Day of Hope Cystinosis Research Foundation Family Conference, Balbo...

By: Natalieswish

Read this article:
Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation and Gene Therapy for Cystinosis - Video

Read More...

Research and Markets: Cell Therapy – Technologies, Markets and Companies – Updated 2013 with New Companies and Profiles

May 3rd, 2013 8:43 am

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/2v6lkd/cell_therapy) has announced the addition of Jain PharmaBiotech's new report "Cell Therapy - Technologies, Markets and Companies" to their offering.

This report describes and evaluates cell therapy technologies and methods, which have already started to play an important role in the practice of medicine. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is replacing the old fashioned bone marrow transplants. Role of cells in drug discovery is also described. Cell therapy is bound to become a part of medical practice.

Stem cells are discussed in detail in one chapter. Some light is thrown on the current controversy of embryonic sources of stem cells and comparison with adult sources. Other sources of stem cells such as the placenta, cord blood and fat removed by liposuction are also discussed. Stem cells can also be genetically modified prior to transplantation.

Cell therapy technologies overlap with those of gene therapy, cancer vaccines, drug delivery, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Pharmaceutical applications of stem cells including those in drug discovery are also described. Various types of cells used, methods of preparation and culture, encapsulation and genetic engineering of cells are discussed. Sources of cells, both human and animal (xenotransplantation) are discussed. Methods of delivery of cell therapy range from injections to surgical implantation using special devices.

Cell therapy has applications in a large number of disorders. The most important are diseases of the nervous system and cancer which are the topics for separate chapters. Other applications include cardiac disorders (myocardial infarction and heart failure), diabetes mellitus, diseases of bones and joints, genetic disorders, and wounds of the skin and soft tissues.

Regulatory and ethical issues involving cell therapy are important and are discussed. Current political debate on the use of stem cells from embryonic sources (hESCs) is also presented. Safety is an essential consideration of any new therapy and regulations for cell therapy are those for biological preparations.

The cell-based markets was analyzed for 2012, and projected to 2022. The markets are analyzed according to therapeutic categories, technologies and geographical areas. The largest expansion will be in diseases of the central nervous system, cancer and cardiovascular disorders. Skin and soft tissue repair as well as diabetes mellitus will be other major markets.

The number of companies involved in cell therapy has increased remarkably during the past few years. More than 500 companies have been identified to be involved in cell therapy and 287 of these are profiled in part II of the report along with tabulation of 273 alliances. Of these companies, 158 are involved in stem cells. Profiles of 72 academic institutions in the US involved in cell therapy are also included in part II along with their commercial collaborations. The text is supplemented with 55 Tables and 12 Figures. The bibliography contains 1,050 selected references, which are cited in the text.

Key Topics Covered:

See the article here:
Research and Markets: Cell Therapy - Technologies, Markets and Companies - Updated 2013 with New Companies and Profiles

Read More...

International Stem Cell Corporation to Present at American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy 16th Annual Meeting

May 1st, 2013 10:42 pm

CARLSBAD, CA--(Marketwired - May 1, 2013) - International Stem Cell Corporation (OTCQB: ISCO) (www.internationalstemcell.com) a California-based biotechnology company developing novel stem cell based therapies announced that Dr. Ruslan Semechkin, VP of Research and Development, will present additional data from the primate study of the use of neuronal cells for the treatment of Parkinson's disease at the 16th Annual Meeting of American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy, May 15-18, 2013 at the Salt Palace Convention Center in Salt Lake City, UT.

The results, including more detailed analysis of the safety and functional activity of the cells, will be presented orally at the following session:

Session: Stem Cell Engineering and Therapy Date: Thursday, May 16, 2013 Time: 2:00 PM Room: Ballroom D Title: Cell Replacement Therapy for Parkinson's Disease with Neuronal Cells Derived from Human Parthenogenetic Stem Cells

In addition ISCO will present two posters detailing progress in our pre-clinical metabolic liver disease program and recent achievements with our "safe" iPS cells, induced pluripotent stem cells that do not rely on viral vectors for the genetic reprogramming. The posters will be presented on Thursday, May 16, 2013 between 4:00 pm and 6:00 pm in Exhibit Hall C/D.

About International Stem Cell Corporation

International Stem Cell Corporation is focused on the therapeutic applications of human parthenogenetic stem cells (hpSCs) and the development and commercialization of cell-based research and cosmetic products. ISCO's core technology, parthenogenesis, results in the creation of pluripotent human stem cells from unfertilized oocytes (eggs) hence avoiding ethical issues associated with the use or destruction of viable human embryos. ISCO scientists have created the first parthenogenetic, homozygous stem cell line that can be a source of therapeutic cells for hundreds of millions of individuals of differing genders, ages and racial background with minimal immune rejection after transplantation. hpSCs offer the potential to create the first true stem cell bank, UniStemCell. ISCO also produces and markets specialized cells and growth media for therapeutic research worldwide through its subsidiary Lifeline Cell Technology (www.lifelinecelltech.com), and stem cell-based skin care products through its subsidiary Lifeline Skin Care (www.lifelineskincare.com). More information is available at http://www.internationalstemcell.com.

To receive ongoing corporate communications via email, visit: http://www.b2i.us/irpass.asp?BzID=1468&to=ea&s=0

To like our Facebook page or follow us on Twitter for company updates and industry related news, visit: http://www.facebook.com/InternationalStemCellCorporation and http://www.twitter.com/intlstemcell

Go here to read the rest:
International Stem Cell Corporation to Present at American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy 16th Annual Meeting

Read More...

ViaCord® to Advance Cord Blood Stem Cell Therapy Research through Collaboration with the Center for International …

April 30th, 2013 11:46 am

WALTHAM, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

ViaCord, PerkinElmers family cord blood and tissue preservation business, is collaborating with the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) to collect, maintain and publish research from ViaCords cord blood stem cell transplants. This collaboration will expand knowledge of cord blood-derived stem cell applications throughout the medical and research community. To date, CIBMTRs large network of transplant centers has resulted in the development of a clinical database of more than 30,000 cord blood transplant recipients for clinical decision-making, use in studies, and other research purposes with the goal of making a profound impact on the survival of cord blood transplant patients around the world. CIBMTR will work directly with ViaCord to collect and analyze data to better understand the quality and any outcome metrics of ViaCords released cord blood stem cell units as well as how the units are being used.

Collaborating with CIBMTR, which has established the industry standard for collecting data around hematopoietic cellular therapy and regenerative medicine, allows us to simultaneously gain insights into the effectiveness of the cord blood stem cell units we have released for use as well as outcomes from their clinical application, said Morey Kraus, Chief Scientific Officer, ViaCord. We are then able to incorporate data from our transplanted units into the larger database, which may be accessed for other CIBMTR studies by the medical and scientific community to further their research and understanding of cord blood stem cells.

ViaCord is working with CIBMTR to collect and publish data as well as identify outcomes unique to related or autologous (stem cells from the same patient) transplants. The collaboration will also enable the analysis of umbilical cord units released for potential future use in autologous cell therapy and regenerative medicine clinical trials, including Cerebral Palsy, Type 1 Diabetes and others.

The science of cord blood and cord tissue stem cells is growing at a rapid pace, said J. Douglas Rizzo, M.D., M.S., Associate Scientific Director, CIBMTR. We are excited to collaborate with ViaCord to provide data and analytic expertise that will assist the development of the field through research.

ViaCord's family cord blood banking services currently offers expectant families the opportunity to preserve their baby's umbilical cord blood for potential medical use by the child or a related family member. Families are also preserving their babys umbilical cord tissue because research suggests that one day these special cells may have the potential to treat medical conditions that are untreatable today. ViaCord has preserved the umbilical cord blood of more than 300,000 newborns. Twenty years ago, cord blood stem cells were used to treat just one disease, Fanconi's anemia. Today, cord blood stem cells have been used in the treatment of nearly 80 diseases, including cancers, certain blood disorders and immunodeficiencies. Please visit http://www.viacord.com for more information.

Factors Affecting Future Performance This press release contains "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not limited to, statements relating to estimates and projections of future earnings per share, cash flow and revenue growth and other financial results, developments relating to our customers and end-markets, and plans concerning business development opportunities and divestitures. Words such as "believes," "intends," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "projects," "forecasts," "will" and similar expressions, and references to guidance, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on management's current assumptions and expectations and no assurances can be given that our assumptions or expectations will prove to be correct. A number of important risk factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described, implied or projected in any forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation: (1) markets into which we sell our products declining or not growing as anticipated; (2) fluctuations in the global economic and political environments; (3) our failure to introduce new products in a timely manner; (4) our ability to execute acquisitions and license technologies, or to successfully integrate acquired businesses and licensed technologies into our existing business or to make them profitable, or successfully divest businesses; (5) our failure to adequately protect our intellectual property; (6) the loss of any of our licenses or licensed rights; (7) our ability to compete effectively; (8) fluctuation in our quarterly operating results and our ability to adjust our operations to address unexpected changes; (9) significant disruption in third-party package delivery and import/export services or significant increases in prices for those services; (10) disruptions in the supply of raw materials and supplies; (11) the manufacture and sale of products exposing us to product liability claims; (12) our failure to maintain compliance with applicable government regulations; (13) regulatory changes; (14) our failure to comply with healthcare industry regulations; (15) economic, political and other risks associated with foreign operations; (16) our ability to retain key personnel; (17) significant disruption in our information technology systems; (18) our ability to obtain future financing; (19) restrictions in our credit agreements; (20) our ability to realize the full value of our intangible assets; (21) significant fluctuations in our stock price; (22) reduction or elimination of dividends on our common stock; and (23) other factors which we describe under the caption "Risk Factors" in our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this press release.

About the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research(CIBMTR) A combined research program of the National Marrow Donor Program and the Medical College of Wisconsin, the CIBMTR facilitates critical, cutting-edge research that has led to increased survival and an enriched quality of life for thousands of patients. The CIBMTR collaborates with the global scientific community to advance hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy research worldwide. The prospective and observational research is accomplished through scientific and statistical expertise, a large network of transplant centers and clinical database of more than 350,000 transplant recipients.

About PerkinElmer, Inc. PerkinElmer, Inc. is a global leader focused on improving the health and safety of people and the environment. The company reported revenue of approximately $2.1 billion in 2012, has about 7,500 employees serving customers in more than 150 countries, and is a component of the S&P 500 Index. Additional information is available through 1-877-PKI-NYSE, or at http://www.perkinelmer.com.

Read this article:
ViaCord® to Advance Cord Blood Stem Cell Therapy Research through Collaboration with the Center for International ...

Read More...

Microgravity Affects The Immune System – The Daily Orbit – Video

April 29th, 2013 8:43 pm


Microgravity Affects The Immune System - The Daily Orbit
Does spaceflight up the risk of disease and disorders? What do you get when you mix dumb mice with human stem cells? Ants are moving on up. And why you shoul...

By: redorbit

Here is the original post:
Microgravity Affects The Immune System - The Daily Orbit - Video

Read More...

Potential Diabetes Breakthrough – Video

April 29th, 2013 8:43 pm


Potential Diabetes Breakthrough
HSCI Co-Director Doug Melton and postdoctoral fellow Peng Yi have discovered a hormone that holds promise for a dramatically more effective treatment of type...

By: harvardstemcell

See original here:
Potential Diabetes Breakthrough - Video

Read More...

Clarifying the effect of stem cell therapy on cancer

April 29th, 2013 2:55 am

Public release date: 28-Apr-2013 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Hilary Glover hilary.glover@biomedcentral.com 44-020-319-22370 BioMed Central

Injection of human stem cells into mice with tumors slowed down tumor growth, finds research published in BioMed Central's open access journal Stem Cell Research & Therapy. Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), isolated from bone marrow, caused changes in blood vessels supplying the tumor, and it is this modification of blood supply which seems to impact tumor growth.

The use of stem cells in treating cancer has been controversial, with some studies finding that stem cells force tumors to enter programmed cell death. However other studies find that stem cells actually promote tumor growth by inducing infiltration of new blood vessels. In attempting to sort out this puzzle researchers from INSERM groups at Universit Joseph Fourier in collaboration with CHU de Grenoble investigated the impact of MSC on already established subcutaneous or lung metastasis in mice.

For both the subcutaneous and lung tumors, injection of MSC reduced cell division, consequently slowing the rate of tumor growth. Part of the mode of action of stem cells therefore appears to be due to with angiogenesis, but the mechanism behind this is still unclear.

Claire Rome who led this study explained, "We found that MSC altered vasculature inside the tumor - although new blood vessels were generated, overall they were longer and fewer than in untreated tumors. This could be restricting the oxygen and nutrients to the tumor, limiting cell division." She continued, "Our study confirms others which propose that stem cells, in particular MSC, might be one way forwards in treating cancer."

Commenting on this study Celia Gomes, from the University of Coimbra, said, "One of the interesting questions this study raises is when MSC promote tumor growth and when they restrict it. The answer seems to be timing this study looks at already established tumors, while others, which find that MSC increase growth, tend to be investigating new tumors. This is a first step in the path to identifying exactly which patients might benefit from stem cell therapy and who will not."

###

Media Contact

Dr Hilary Glover Scientific Press Officer, BioMed Central Tel: +44 (0) 20 3192 2370 Mob: +44 (0) 778 698 1967 Email: hilary.glover@biomedcentral.com

Visit link:
Clarifying the effect of stem cell therapy on cancer

Read More...

The amazing trick that turns stem cells into cartilage! – Video

April 28th, 2013 9:43 am


The amazing trick that turns stem cells into cartilage!
http://www.stemcellsarthritistreatment The tough job that stem cells have in treating arthritis. Hyaline cartilage- the tough cartilage that caps the ends of...

By: Nathan Wei

More:
The amazing trick that turns stem cells into cartilage! - Video

Read More...

Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine: Learning from Spin-Outs

April 28th, 2013 3:11 am
Tweet 



The meeting “Commercialization of Your Regenerative Medicine Research: Lessons from Spin Out Successes” was hosted by the Oxbridge Biotech Roundtable (OBR) (Oxford, UK) at the University of Oxford in February, 2013, and attracted a multi-stakeholder audience spanning academia and industry. 


The event featured case studies from Gregg Sando, CEO, Cell Medica (London, UK), John Sinden, CSO, Reneuron (Guilford, UK), and Paul Kemp, CEO and CSO, Intercytex (Manchester, UK). 


OBR is a student-led initiative with over 7000 members across eight different UK and US locations with a mission to foster a conversation about the healthcare and life sciences industry. 


Anna French and David A. Brindley, along with some of my assistance, captured and have now published the main themes of the meeting and the major questions facing the regenerative medicine industry and its rapidly emerging subsets of cellular and gene therapies. 


Notably, we discuss the compatibility of regenerative therapies to the existing healthcare infrastructure, biomanufacturing challenges (including scalability and comparability), and the amenability of regenerative therapies to existing reimbursement and investment models. Furthermore, we reiterate key words of advice from seasoned industry leaders intended to accelerate the translation path from lab bench to the marketplace.


To read the review see: Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine: Learning from Spin-Outs


Anna French, R. Lee Buckler, and David A. Brindley. Rejuvenation Research. April 2013, 16(2): 164-170. doi:10.1089/rej.2013.1423.
http://www.celltherapyblog.com hosted by http://www.celltherapygroup.com

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/4Uv2o54_hWQ/commercialization-of-regenerative.html

Read More...

California Stem Cell Agency Seeks Lobbyist Bids

April 28th, 2013 3:11 am

The California stem cell agency has put
out a bid for a private lobbyist to watch out for its interests in
Sacramento, perhaps severing a longtime relationship with one of the
Capitol's more prestigious power brokers.
The $3 billion agency has had
a contract since 2005 with Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross &
Leoni LLP
of Sacramento, which reported lobbying revenue last
year of more than $5 million. That made it one of the top revenue producers among California lobbyists.
The agency's contract is tiny, however.
It started at $49,900 for five months in 2005 on a no-bid contract with Nielsen, although the annual figure is now $49,999.  The agency's request this month for bids calls for a boost to $65,000 annually.
Nielsen Merksamer is very active in
health care lobbying. Its biotech/pharmaceutical clients have included Genentech, Merck &
Co
. and Pfizer. The firm also played a role in the drafting of and
campaign for Proposition 71 in 2004. In 2009, at the behest of
Robert Klein, then chairman of the agency, it produced a legal memo
that Klein used to help box in the agency governing board on taking a
position on the Little Hoover Commission report recommending major
changes at the enterprise.
The stem cell agency is one of the few
agencies that hires a private lobbyist, which has raised some
eyebrows. Nearly all agencies handle legislative relations
internally.
Deadline for bids is May 3.

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/0HfVYv0XVQg/california-stem-cell-agency-seeks.html

Read More...

Stem Cell Agency Provides More Cost Detail on Future Plans

April 28th, 2013 3:11 am

The California stem cell agency today clarified the size of the assumed "public investment" in its rough outline of its plan for future activities. 


In response to a query from the California Stem Cell Report, Don Gibbons, a spokesman for the agency, said,

"This hypothetical range of public investment ($50 million to $200 million) is thought of as a one-time investment, with hope of private investments in multiples of that with the fund recharging to some extent based on revenue."

Gibbons also said the agency did not want to indicate what it was prepared to pay for the study.  He said, 

 "We have not wanted to post the budget range because we want honest estimates of what folks think the budget should be rather than having them penciling estimates that max out the budget."


Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/rXqOoGO0Z0k/stem-cell-agency-provides-more-cost.html

Read More...

Deadline This October: California Stem Cell Agency Seeking Detailed Public-Private Plan for its Future

April 28th, 2013 3:11 am

The $3 billion California stem cell
agency, which is currently scheduled to go out of business in a few
years, hopes to come up with a detailed plan by this fall for a novel
public-private arrangement that would extend its life.

The rough outlines of the proposal
assume $50 to $200 million in “public investment,” although it is
not clear whether that would be a one-time figure or an annual amount
from presumably the state budget or perhaps another state bond
measure. The concept includes additional private funding of a
yet-to-be-determined nature. (The agency later said that the public investment figures would be a one-time event.)
The broad sketch of the agency's latest
thinking about how to regenerate itself was found in an RFP posted four days ago on its website.
CIRM is seeking a consultant who would
flesh out the general concepts that it has offered. Work would
begin in mid June and be completed in four months, close to the ninth
anniversary of the agency, formally known as the California
Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
The RFP did not contain a figure
for the cost of the study, but said that the price would be part of
the criteria for evaluating bids.
CIRM was created in November 2004 when
California voters approved Proposition 71, a ballot initiative. Since
then it has awarded $1.8 billion to 595 recipients. It is funded by
money borrowed by the state (bonds), but cash for new grants is
scheduled to run out in 2017. Interests costs on the bonds raise the
total cost of the agency to roughly $6 billion.
CIRM said in the RFP that the plan for
its future should provide

“...an in-depth analysis of various
public-private funding models with potential to attract private
sector investment to, and facilitate further development of the most
promising CIRM-supported research projects; and recommend a single
preferred approach for achieving this goal, complete with details
relating to the recommended structure and an operational plan.”

The RFP also contained a just-released,
$31,750 study by CBT Advisors of Cambridge, Mass, that examined
mechanisms for financing translational research, which is the key
focus nowadays at the stem cell agency. Such research is aimed at
pushing laboratory findings into the marketplace.
Among other things, the CBT report,
whose lead author was Steve Dickman, said,

“The nature of CIRM as a state agency
is perhaps the biggest weak point (and) has to be addressed politically
and cleared up as soon as possible or raising money will be
unnecessarily challenging.”

The CBT study did not address how that
might be done, which could be a considerable task. Proposition 71
modified the state constitution and state law and can be altered only
by a super, super majority vote of the legislature or by another
ballot initiative.
California is the first state to
provide billions for stem cell research by using borrowed money. It
also is unique in California state government in that its funding
flows directly to the agency and cannot be altered by the governor or
the legislature.
Translating all that into some sort of
public-private arrangement would be novel among state government
departments and could well require legislative or voter approval.
The California Stem Cell Report has
queried the agency concerning the frequency of the assumed “public
investment” and CIRM's budget for the RFP. We will report that
information when we receive it.  (The agency later declined to disclose what it was prepared to pay for the study.)

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/uqpFc/~3/bdJQjlhAoPM/deadline-this-october-california-stem.html

Read More...

Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine: Learning from Spin-Outs

April 28th, 2013 3:08 am
Tweet 



The meeting “Commercialization of Your Regenerative Medicine Research: Lessons from Spin Out Successes” was hosted by the Oxbridge Biotech Roundtable (OBR) (Oxford, UK) at the University of Oxford in February, 2013, and attracted a multi-stakeholder audience spanning academia and industry. 


The event featured case studies from Gregg Sando, CEO, Cell Medica (London, UK), John Sinden, CSO, Reneuron (Guilford, UK), and Paul Kemp, CEO and CSO, Intercytex (Manchester, UK). 


OBR is a student-led initiative with over 7000 members across eight different UK and US locations with a mission to foster a conversation about the healthcare and life sciences industry. 


Anna French and David A. Brindley, along with some of my assistance, captured and have now published the main themes of the meeting and the major questions facing the regenerative medicine industry and its rapidly emerging subsets of cellular and gene therapies. 


Notably, we discuss the compatibility of regenerative therapies to the existing healthcare infrastructure, biomanufacturing challenges (including scalability and comparability), and the amenability of regenerative therapies to existing reimbursement and investment models. Furthermore, we reiterate key words of advice from seasoned industry leaders intended to accelerate the translation path from lab bench to the marketplace.


To read the review see: Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine: Learning from Spin-Outs


Anna French, R. Lee Buckler, and David A. Brindley. Rejuvenation Research. April 2013, 16(2): 164-170. doi:10.1089/rej.2013.1423.
http://www.celltherapyblog.com hosted by http://www.celltherapygroup.com

Source:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CellTherapyBlog/~3/4Uv2o54_hWQ/commercialization-of-regenerative.html

Read More...

Page 1,312«..1020..1,3111,3121,3131,314..1,3201,330..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick