header logo image


Page 131«..1020..130131132133..140150..»

The Middle East molecular diagnostics market is projected to reach $1,017.7 million by 2031 from $493.1 million in 2020, at a CAGR of 6.72% during the…

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

ReportLinker

The growth in the Middle East molecular diagnostics market is expected to be driven by factors such as the increasing prevalence of infectious diseases and various types of cancer in the Middle East, rising awareness of personalized medicine and its acceptance, coupled with the significant number of funding for executing R&D in Middle East region.

New York, June 07, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "Middle East Molecular Diagnostics Market - Country Analysis: Focus on Product, Testing Location, Technology, Application, End User, and Country Data - Analysis and Forecast, 2021-2031" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p06284299/?utm_source=GNW

Market Lifecycle Stage

Diagnostics is a well-developed market with an integral part of medical decision-making -aid in acquiring information for a wide range of treatment dissemination, accentuating their criticality in healthcare.Molecular diagnostics has a critical role in the precision medicine approach, as it ensures the safe and effective application of targeted therapeutics.

Most of the players in the Middle East molecular diagnostics market offer products encompassing the kits and reagents, instruments, and software categories.

Increasing investments in the R&D for molecular diagnostics is one of the major opportunities in the Middle East molecular diagnostics market. Several diagnostics and pharmaceutical companies are working collaboratively to develop next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), in-situ hybridization (ISH), microarray, nucleic acid amplification-, or mass spectrometry-based molecular diagnostics for the applications in several disease indications in order to enable efficient diagnosis, treatment selection, dosage selection, and treatment monitoring.

Impact

Several techniques are employed in modern molecular diagnostics to detect and quantify specific DNA or RNA sequences, as well as proteins. Some of these additional technologies are described briefly below: Immunohistochemistry (IHC): IHC is the utilization of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies for the detection of specific antigens in tissue sections. In Situ Hybridization (ISH or FISH): This is a technique that unwinds DNA or RNA in the sample and employs a labeled DNA or RNA strand (probe), which hybridizes with the complementary sequence on an unwound strand (target). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allows researchers to amplify a small amount of DNA to quantities that can be used for analysis. PCR has ushered in a golden era in molecular diagnostics. Sequencing (CE, NGS): The sequencing allows the mapping of the entire sequence of the nucleotides that comprise a strand of DNA. As of 2020, sequencing can be achieved through capillary electrophoresis (CE) or through multiple next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods.

Impact of COVID-19

The current Middle East molecular diagnostics market comprises software, instruments, and consumables.It has been noticed that there has been a reduction in the capacity or shutdowns of laboratories and other research institutions, that have led to reduced usage of instruments, consumables, and software related to research.

Overall, the impact of COVID-19 on the Middle East molecular diagnostics market size has been low-moderate.Some of the market players have reported a slight decline in sales.

However, financials are already on their way to recovery.The decline in revenues was mostly a result of the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, which comprised complete lockdowns across countries and major cities, thus interrupting the supply chain.

The timeline of impact spanned the end of the first quarter and the second quarter of 2020 for most of the key markets across the Middle East. However, the pandemic has played a key role in enhancing the growth prospects of molecular diagnostics and is expected to indirectly aid in improving the market growth outlook.

Market Segmentation

Segmentation 1: by Product Systems Kits and Consumables Software and Other Products

The Middle East molecular diagnostics market in the products segment is expected to be dominated by the kits and consumables segment. This is due to an increasing number of molecular diagnostics kit providers offering kits and services to their end users.

Segmentation 2: by Testing Location Laboratory Testing Point-of-Care Testing

The Middle East molecular diagnostics market is dominated by the laboratory testing segment owing to an increasing number of molecular diagnostic laboratories in the Middle East region involved in undertaking various routine testing for different chronic and acute diseases.

Segmentation 3: by Technology Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology (INAAT) Microarray In-Situ Hybridization (ISH) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Other Technologies

The polymerase chain reaction segment dominates the Middle East molecular diagnostics market due to the increasing number of PCR testing being carried out in the Middle East laboratories for diagnosis.

Segmentation 4: by Application Core Molecular Diagnostics Reproductive Genetics Companion Diagnostics Liquid Biopsy Others

The core molecular diagnostic segment dominates the Middle East molecular diagnostics market due to the rising number of molecular testing in laboratories to cure diseases. Core molecular diagnostics applications include a large number of inclusive applications that cater to the major portion of the Middle East molecular diagnostics market.

Segmentation 5: by End User Hospitals Diagnostic Centres Outpatient Clinics/General Practitioners Research Laboratories Others

The hospitals segment dominates the Middle East molecular diagnostics market as hospitals, particularly in Middle East countries have incorporated extensive molecular diagnostics portfolios to provide superior care to patients suffering from diseases.

Segmentation 6: by Countryo Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A.)o Israelo United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.)o Egypto Irano Qataro Other Countries

K.S.A. generated the highest revenue of $132.5 million in 2020. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A.) has a huge population base suffering from various diseases and rising healthcare costs in the region. Medical research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A.) has gained momentum since 2013 and is heavily being invested in by the local government. The government is extensively supporting research organizations with projects aimed at improving the understanding and treatment of diseases affecting the Saudi population.

Recent Developments in Middle East Molecular Diagnostics Market

In January 2022, Abbott showcased its life-changing diagnostic tools and medical devices product portfolio for point-of-care testing (POCT) that helped COVID-19, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease patients at MEDLAB Middle East. In June 2021, biomeruix launched EPISEQ SARS-COV-2 to identify SARS-CoV-2 variants using samples from COVID-19 positive patients. In 2021, the BD. company declared the approval of the BD Veritor At-Home COVID-19 Test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with definitive digital results at home. In 2020, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. partnered with Seegene, Inc., a Middle East leader in multiplex molecular diagnostics, for the commercialization and clinical development of molecular diagnostic products.

Demand Drivers and Limitations

Following are the demand drivers for the Middle East Molecular Diagnostics Market: Increasing Prevalence of Infectious Diseases and Various Types of Cancer in the Middle East Increase in Awareness and Acceptance of Personalized Medicines in the Middle East Significant External Funding for Executing Research and Development Exercises

The market is expected to face some limitations too due to the following challenges: Uncertain Reimbursement Scenario Lack of High-Complexity Testing Centers in the Middle East

How Can This Report Add Value to an Organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: Major manufacturers of the Middle East molecular diagnostic market, along with the service providers, are actively involved in undertaking significant business strategies to translate success in research and development into the commercial clinical setting.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: Owing to the explosion of massively parallel sequencing and its applications, all areas of medicine have been affected, particularly molecular diagnostics.PCR has gradually evolved from gel analysis to real-time PCR to, more recently, digital PCR.

In digital PCR, amplification of individual targets is done in picolitre to nanoliter volumes, and instead of standard curves or internal controls, statistics are employed to calculate target concentrations.Genome-wide studies have gone beyond unknown expeditions, and disease association studies that use the expression, single nucleotide polymorphism, and copy number microarrays have identified useful markers that have been reduced to practical molecular tests.

Big data needs have resulted in new bioinformatics tools that continue to evolve rapidly.

Competitive Strategy: Key players in the Middle East molecular diagnostics market analyzed and profiled in the study have been involved as the Middle East molecular diagnostics-based product manufacturers that provide software and molecular diagnostic services.Moreover, a detailed competitive benchmarking of the players operating in the Middle East molecular diagnostics market has been done to help the reader understand how players stack against each other, presenting a clear market landscape.

Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis

The companies that are profiled have been selected based on inputs gathered from primary experts and analyzing company coverage, product portfolio, and market penetration.

Some of the prominent names established in this market are: Abbott Agilent Technologies, Inc. bioMrieux SA BD Babirus Medical Equipment LLC Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Danaher F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Guardant Health Illumina, Inc. QIAGEN N.V. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Countries Covered K.S.A. Israel U.A.E. Egypt Iran Qatar Rest-of-the-Middle EastRead the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p06284299/?utm_source=GNW

About ReportlinkerReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

__________________________

Story continues

Excerpt from:
The Middle East molecular diagnostics market is projected to reach $1,017.7 million by 2031 from $493.1 million in 2020, at a CAGR of 6.72% during the...

Read More...

Can the industry elevate the success rate of cancer trials? – OutSourcing-Pharma.com

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

An estimated 90% of clinical trials centered on cancers fail, sending those potential oncological treatments either to the drawing board or the scrap heap. Each unsuccessful trial means billions lost in R&D investment and, potentially, countless lives.

During this years BIO International Convention (taking place June 13-16 in San Diego), a group of industry professionals will share with attendees reasons why it doesnt have to be that way. Matthew Clark, board member and advisor with CerFlux, is one of the panelists speaking during Cancer Trials Dont Have to Fail 90% of the Time. Seriously, scheduled at 11 am PDT on Wednesday, June 15; Outsourcing-Pharma recently connected with Clark to learn about the session, and how cancer-centered trials might be able to improve their prognosis.

OSP: Could you please share your thoughts about the high failure rate of cancer trials, and how that proportion has changed over the years?

MC: One of the clearest presentations of this data from 2004 through 2015 is a study by Wong and colleagues in 2019 that indicated a 3.4% probability of success for oncology development efforts. Their research also revealed that over the last twenty years there has been little change in the probability of success of clinical trials as they vacillated around 5%.

The most recent results published by BIO last year showed a roughly 5.4% likelihood of success from preclinical to FDA approval for cancer treatments. This reveals that in terms of outcomes there is little improvement over the last 20 years.

OSP: In a nutshell, what are some of the reasons (big and small) for that high rate?

MC: There are numerous reasons for this high failure rate. Ill highlight only a few that require our attention. Perhaps the biggest reason is that cancer involves many variables involving heterogeneous populations and disease presentations. This conclusion is further evident from the consistently low failure rate of clinical trials prior to approval (90-98% failure) over more than a decade and the low probability of successful therapy (<25%) from FDA-approved therapeutics. This suggests that we consistently choose a target for therapy that cannot be demonstrated via traditional clinical trials.

Another reason related to multivariate factors in clinical trials for cancer pharmaceutical developments includes challenges with inclusion criteria for clinical trial participants. Simply put, the clear suggestion is that we are not testing the right products, focused on the right factors or outcome variables for clinical benefit, in the right populations or models, at the right time prior to going to clinical trial. We have to remember that clinical trials should be demonstrations of clinical utility rather than exploratory in nature or purpose.

OSP: What kinds of solutions might pharma companies and their research partners have tackled in the past to try and bring that number down?

MC: Biomarkers are perhaps the focus of the greatest push over the last nearly 20 years in the pharmaceutical industry. Most pointedly, there is a focus on omics to identify appropriate biomarkers. These approaches include proteomics, genomics, and metabolomics, to name a few, and are developing towards multi-omics.

Since the early 2000s, the argument has been that they can make a big difference, particularly when combined with existing techniques. The method is effective for exploratory research but has not produced the consistent results needed for the traditional groups-based designs generally used in clinical trials.

Similarly, cell-line-derived xenografts, patient-derived xenografts, and genetically modified animal models have generated lots of excitement because they attempt to mimic complex microenvironments or biological processes leading to or promoting cancer. These methods are expensive, time-consuming, and ultimately serve as a model that may not generalize back to the human disease state.

Unfortunately, the success of all of these approaches is less than clear as indicated by the consistently low probability of success or likelihood of approval at around 5% for more than 20 years. These efforts may have potential in the preclinical and exploratory arena, but to date, they have had little value in clinically relevant, therapeutic pharmaceutical development in the aggregate.

OSP: How can personalized medicine help elevate oncological drug development?

MC: A primary goal of personalized medicine is to tackle the heterogeneity of cancer directly. At the core, cancer is personalized, so the treatment of cancer must likewise be personalized.

However, the strategies for clinical success generally require group-based designs. This means the goal is to use individual responses to both the disease and possible therapeutics to identify the factors or biological processes at the right time allowing for better targets for therapeutic development that are not only effective but also have fewer side effects.

Through personalized medicine, we can take a more refined and nuanced approach to the treatment of different cancers that manifest in categorical and specific ways that treat the factors evident for a subgroup of those with the disease. Focused development will lead to more focused and more effective drug indications.

Done effectively, we believe that personalized medicine can further reduce the costs and time of drug development by elucidating what factors matter when in the progression of the disease. Therefore, personalized medicine can reduce the noise that historically plagued the development of drugs for cancer ultimately upending the vast majority of clinical trials.

We believe that with personalized medicine we can address the variability inherent in cancer by better identifying and aligning the idiosyncratic and temporal aspects of cancer with the concomitant treatments that are required; essentially, synchronizing the variability in cancer with the array of therapeutic formulations like two overlapping sine curves instead of interference from being out of phase.

Another outcome of personalized medicine is that it can help reduce hesitancy to participate in clinical trials through better target selection concurrently with off-target identification. It also will improve inclusion criteria, endpoint selection for trials, clinical trial planning, and decrease the cycle time for trials to enroll and complete. Each of these is a challenge to the development of cancer therapeutics that personalized medicine can improve.

OSP: How can companies like yours help drug development pros harness PM to put their cancer treatment candidates on a more favorable path?

MC: The hallmark of the CerFlux platform is providing a preview of clinical response well in advance of clinical development through ex vivo screening and analytics of drugs, or combinations of drugs, directly against actual tumor biopsy. Such previews could vastly improve productivity and returns by redirecting investment in more productive assets early and also improve patient outcomes.

Screening directly against tumor biopsies allows us to evaluate and better appreciate the heterogeneity and complexity of cancer in relevant ways that should be predictive of clinical outcomes. For instance, directly analyzing patient tumor biopsy avoids distortion of tissue composition and microarchitecture resulting from dissociation or expansion. Further, since core biopsies are standard of care for many solid tumors, such evaluation would add minimal burden on patients and clinical care teams.

Finally, assessment of standard of care biopsies would also mitigate racial and ethnic biases. This would allow pharmaceutical companies to better target their limited resources on drugs that are likely to have a higher probability of success on a broader population while further reducing the probability of negative side effects. Of course, our approach will not be a panacea, but we believe that it will be a notable improvement over the current approach that is clearly not working. Over time, iterative and incremental improvements through our process will help people find ways to live productive lives with cancer.

OSP: Do you have anything to add?

MC: Thank you for the opportunity to share our perspective and how we are trying to motivate change in this important area. The more we transparently challenge ourselves to be better, the greater the opportunity to partner for solutions that make a difference for thoseliving with cancer.

The BIO International Convention is scheduled June 13-16 at the San Diego Convention Center. Visit the show website for more information or to register.

More here:
Can the industry elevate the success rate of cancer trials? - OutSourcing-Pharma.com

Read More...

It’s time to move past Aduhelm and focus on a broader Alzheimer’s drug pipeline – STAT

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

When Alzheimers disease was believed to be caused solely by the accumulation of amyloid protein in the brain, pinning all hopes on an amyloid-targeting drug like Aduhelm the first drug approved to treat Alzheimers in 17 years made sense. But newer knowledge that ties Alzheimers to the biology of aging indicates the disease is caused by a combination of age-related changes in the brain that affect different people in different ways.

That means neither Aduhelm nor any anti-amyloid drug on its own will be a cure for the estimated 6.2 million Americans living with Alzheimers. The next phase of research must focus on promising drugs that target a host of underlying pathologies that contribute to Alzheimers.

Today more than ever, research is embracing this new understanding, taking a more diversified multiple shots on goal approach to new drug targets. More than three in four treatments currently in clinical development work against non-amyloid targets. These include drugs to reduce inflammation in the brain, improve blood flow, clear misfolded proteins, improve how the brain metabolizes energy, and more.

advertisement

To complement these pathways, new biomarkers are needed that will give physicians like me the tools needed to zero in on the causes of each patients Alzheimers and tailor combinations to provide precision personalized medicine.

Alzheimers research is notoriously challenging and expensive, outstripping cost estimates for research in most other therapeutic areas. The brain is incredibly complex, and while Alzheimers is the most common cause of dementia, it is not the only one. But Im more optimistic than ever about whats coming down the pipeline because Alzheimers research has moved into a modern era, not only in the breadth of its targets but in its ability to implement more rigorous clinical trials that track and determine the relationship between biomarker and clinical outcomes.

advertisement

If Aduhelm and other anti-amyloid antibodies that follow it are, at best, just one incremental piece of the puzzle, how do the blanks get filled in? For a start, it is time for everyone in the Alzheimers ecosphere to look toward a broader and more diverse approach to curing this devastating disease and speed the development of new, effective therapies to treat and prevent Alzheimers disease and related dementias.

A critical driver of better and faster clinical trials are biomarkers objectively measurable biological and behavioral characteristics that correlate with Alzheimers disease that are essential for improving trial design and quickly advancing the current pipeline of novel targets.

Biomarkers are already being used to great effect in early-stage trials, quickly telling researchers whether an experimental drug is engaging with its intended target in the brain. They are also playing a larger role in later-stage trials, providing better and quicker ways to screen and enroll patients whose Alzheimers disease profile includes the characteristic the experimental drug is meant to work on, and then by providing an easy means for tracking the effects of treatment. Biomarker data from brain amyloid PET scans, for example, provided the primary data for Aduhelms Food and Drug Administration accelerated approval.

Biomarkers are also making their way into clinical practice. Physicians can now use tests of blood and cerebrospinal fluid to measure brain amyloid levels in people experiencing early signs of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. The day will soon come when a simple blood sample, retina scan, or even a smartphone app will be able to identify underlying causes of Alzheimers during a doctor visit, allowing for treatment to be matched to a patients unique pathology.

As more drugs are developed against a wide range of targets, biomarkers must play a bigger role than ever in clinical trials. Researchers worldwide are working toward validating additional blood and other non-invasive tests that can measure brain levels of everything from tau and other toxic proteins to biological indicators of neuroinflammation, synaptic malfunction, and changes in metabolism. These new biomarker tests will be essential for both clinical trials and clinical practice.

Alzheimers researchers need to work together to conduct more biomarker-powered exploratory trials to more quickly and effectively assess whether a drug has promise. By adopting best practices in designing exploratory trials, researchers and companies can be more confident in using their results to make the all-important go/no-go decisions about advancing drugs to larger, later-stage trials.

In 2019, the Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation (which I co-founded) and the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration convened an advisory panel of experts to provide recommendations on ways to optimize the design and application of exploratory trials. The panels recommendations, published last year in the journal Neurology, are designed to improve trial designs and engage patients more efficiently. When it comes to clinical trials, participants are a limited resource, so it is vitally important, especially for rarer forms of dementia, that they are matched to the right trials and that these trials run as efficiently as possible so each patients involvement is valued and maximized.

Policies that support efforts to bring repurposed drugs to the market are also urgently needed. Repurposed drugs start with an advantage because some of the research, including essential information about safety in humans, has already been done. But they are hampered by the economic disadvantage of limited returns on investment.

The pressure from patient advocacy groups for the FDA to approve and for Medicare to cover Aduhelm a drug that was at best only going to have a modest incremental benefit reflects the understandable public hunger for new Alzheimers treatments. It also underscores the urgent need for better ways to get effective drugs to market for the millions living with Alzheimers.

Its encouraging to see broader consensus in the research community for the need to take fresh looks at the biology of aging. In a 2021 Alzheimers Clinical Trials report, the Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation analyzed the approximately 120 clinical trials underway that are tackling a variety of age-related pathways.

These efforts will open the doors to new breakthroughs and the kinds of combination therapies that have changed the lives of people with cancer, diabetes, HIV, and other diseases. At this pivotal moment, academia, industry, regulatory agencies, patient advocates, venture philanthropists, and others need to work together as a community to accelerate the move into this new era of treatment possibilities for people with Alzheimers.

Howard M. Fillit is a neuroscientist and geriatrician, the co-founder and chief science officer of the Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundation, and a clinical professor of geriatric medicine and palliative care, medicine, and neuroscience at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. He reports having consulted for various pharmaceutical companies, including Alector, LifeWorx, Eli Lilly, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, and others.

See the rest here:
It's time to move past Aduhelm and focus on a broader Alzheimer's drug pipeline - STAT

Read More...

Purdue Polytechnic Institute and Purdue University Global collaborating on partnership with the University of Puerto Rico – Purdue University

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. Collaboration among Purdue University, Purdue Polytechnic Institute and Purdue University Global is leading the way to a unique partnership with the University of Puerto Rico.

A Purdue delegation of administrators, faculty and students visited Puerto Rico in March to meet with representatives and students fromfour University of Puerto Rico (UPR) campuses Bayamn, Humacao, Mayaguez and Rio Piedras as well as the Center for Marine Science at UPR-Mayaguez and the University of Puerto Rico Hospital.

The entire Purdue system is pleased to partner with the University of Puerto Rico to explore the creation and offering of new academic opportunities in an innovative fashion that serves both current and future workforce development needs, saidMelissa Burdi, Purdue University Global vice president and dean of the School of Nursing, who was part of the delegation. UPR is a highlyvalued partner, and we look forward to a dynamic and meaningful collaboration.

In a joint statement, Miguel Vlez-Rubio, chancellor for UPR-Bayamn, and Jorge F. Rovira-Alvarez, dean of academic affairs, said: The University of Puerto Rico at Bayamn is pursuing a strong collaboration partnership with Purdue University and its affiliates. We are confident that establishing agreements on diverse academic fields and services will allow both institutions to grow, and we foresee ample benefits for current students and future recruitment. It most definitively expands our academic offering and provides students with additional opportunities to develop both in professional areas and personal interests.

During the weeklong stay, Purdue students gave presentations on sustainability and climate change, biomedical innovation, emerging COVID technologies, mass migration at the U.S.-Mexico border and precision medicine and exchanged ideas with UPR students. They visited the Engine-4 coworking space, an incubator and the marine science laboratory in Mayaguez.

The focus was to forge relationships that willbenefit students and professors in disciplines such as precision medicine and health care, sustainability and climate change, and engineering. Specifically, the Purdue team initially identified three key areas to serve as a springboard for the partnership. They are:

Nursing: The Purdue University Global School of Nursing will collaborate with UPR to develop innovative education offerings and will invite nursing faculty from UPR to the Purdue West Lafayette campus for a Summer Institute to explore immersive learning virtual reality options for nursing faculty and students in Puerto Rico. Building this unique partnership affords the Purdue system and UPR the ability to co-create learning opportunities aimed at solving current and future workforce challenges within the entire health care ecosystem, where education and hands-on preparation are key, including the use of precision medicine, Burdi said.

With precision medicine, the goal is to utilize robots to disinfect critical areas in Puerto Rico hospitals while also detecting different contaminants in the hospitals air. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Purdue students worked with Luciano Castillo, theKenninger Professor of Renewable Energy and Power Systems in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue, and Richard Voyles, head of the Collaborative Robotics Lab at Purdue and director of the Robotics Accelerator, to design, build and deploy two autonomous cleaning robots to disinfect spaces.

Engineering: Purdue West Lafayette will develop a transfer program for UPR students to complete their degree in biomedical engineering and aerospace engineering. UPR-Bayamn is limited in the number of students accepted by UPR-Mayaguez into their existing programs. Additionally, this program will allow Purdue to grow its pool of diverse students in areas not offered at UPR-Bayamn, such as aerospace engineering, nuclear engineering, materials engineering and biomedical engineering. In collaboration with UPR faculty, Purdue faculty will develop a template for introductory courses. For Purdue to partner with the University of Puerto Rico to help them grow engineering programs, such as aerospace engineering and biomedical engineering, is a unique way to help grow the local workforce while increasing diversity here and promoting unique research partnerships such as Coastal Resiliency, said Mung Chiang, the John A. Edwardson Dean of the College of Engineering and Purdues vice president for strategic initiatives.

Professional development for police: UPR-Bayamn is the primary institution designated by the government to offer training opportunities for police. Purdue has identified a unique opportunity to leverage existing funding todevelop and offer high-quality professional development.

To jumpstart the partnership, UPR stakeholders have been invited to participate in the Summer Institute for Sustainability & Climate Change at Purdue West Lafayette from June 20 to Aug. 1.

Castillo is working with the Office of Naval Research (ONR) on a consortium for Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Hispanic-serving institutions to conduct this initiative with the goal of building and mentoring a diverse workforce that will solve future challenges pertaining to sustainability climate change, security and precision medicine. The target audience is K-12 students and faculty and college undergraduate and graduate students, and participants will receive a certificate of completion after taking part in the monthlong institute.

Addressing social inequality and engaging the untapped talent in our communities while solving climate change, health challenges, and security are major goals of our consortium, Castillo said. By increasing a diverse STEM workforce, we will accelerate new innovations, which will propel a strong economy in Puerto Rico, specifically in disadvantaged communities. For us to partner with the University of Puerto Rico to address problems related to coastal resiliency, renewable energy and train a strong STEM workforcewill help us build a vibrant future for the island and in the mainland.

About Purdue University

Purdue University is a top public research institution developing practical solutions to todays toughest challenges. Ranked in each of the last four years as one of the 10 Most Innovative universities in the United States by U.S. News & World Report, Purdue delivers world-changing research and out-of-this-world discovery. Committed to hands-on and online, real-world learning, Purdue offers a transformative education to all. Committed to affordability and accessibility, Purdue has frozen tuition and most fees at 2012-13 levels, enabling more students than ever to graduate debt-free. See how Purdue never stops in the persistent pursuit of the next giant leap athttps://stories.purdue.edu.

About Purdue Polytechnic Institute

The Purdue Polytechnic Institute, one of the 10 academic colleges of Purdue University, provides a unique array of high-demand technology disciplines for bachelors, masters and Ph.D. degrees available on Purdues flagship campus in West Lafayette, Indiana, and at other locations throughout the state. The Polytechnics faculty and staff encourage innovation, collaboration and creativity among diverse interdisciplinary groups in the persistent pursuit of big ideas and novel approaches. Thanks to our generous alumni and engaged industry partners, Purdue Polytechnic continues the important steps of Purdues history, preparing our graduates for their successful futures.

About Purdue University Global

Purdue University Global delivers personalized online education tailored to the unique needs of adults who have work or life experience beyond the classroom, enabling them to develop essential academic and professional skills with the support and flexibility they need to achieve their career goals. It offers personalized paths for students to earn an associate, bachelors, masters or doctoral degree, based on their work experience, desired pace, military service, previous college credits and other considerations no matter where they are in their life journey. Purdue University Global is a nonprofit, public university accredited by the Higher Learning Commission. It is affiliated with Purdue Universitys flagship institution, a highly ranked public research university located in West Lafayette, Indiana. Purdue University also operates regional campuses in Fort Wayne and Northwest Indiana, as well as serving science, engineering and technology students at the Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) campus. For more information, visit purdueglobal.edu.

Media Contact: Tom Schott, tschott@purdue.edu

Sources: Mung Chiang

Maricel Lawrence

Melissa Burdi

Luciano Castillo

Here is the original post:
Purdue Polytechnic Institute and Purdue University Global collaborating on partnership with the University of Puerto Rico - Purdue University

Read More...

Illumina Announces Next Generation Products and Data at AGBT General Meeting to Advance Innovative Customer Solutions – PR Newswire

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

"At Illumina, customers are at the center of what we do, and we are excited to connect with them at AGBT to unveil our next-generation genomics solutions and learn more about their specific needs and requirements," said Susan Tousi, Chief Commercial Officer at Illumina. "AGBT represents a key opportunity for Illumina to continue driving innovations that accelerate personalized medicine far into the future with our many valued partners."

New, longer-read kit configurations

Expected to be released later this year, the new 600 cycle kit on NextSeq 1000/2000 will deliver longer, paired-end 2x300bp reads and expand the breadth of applications ranging from metagenomics to immune-repertoire profiling. Data will be presented demonstrating NextSeq 2000 as a powerful, new tool to enable full-length V(D)J immune repertoire sequencing at scale to further understand the human immunome.

"The upcoming launch of our new NextSeq kits is another important step towards continuing to elevate sequencing to a new industry benchmark," said Alex Aravanis, SVP and Chief Technology Officer at Illumina. "Greater gene sequencing depth and length, combined with advanced library preparation approaches, represent the next wave of technological advances in repertoire sequencing that will unlock the power of the genome to transform human health."

New data with Infinity Technology

In its June 8 session entitled "Emerging Applications and Advances in Whole Genome Sequencing," Illumina will share new data from its Infinity technology platform, demonstrating exceptional performance across difficult-to-map regions of the genome, the ability to resolve complex structural variants, and the functionality to generate phased data across the highly polymorphic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) regions to assign haplotypes. Additionally, Illumina will share data using the Infinity technology in combination with targeted enrichment. This approach allows users to target the approximately 5% of difficult-to-map genic regions in combination with a standard Illumina genome to enable unprecedented scale using a novel and cost-effective approach.

The Ashley Lab at Stanford University has been an early collaborator with Illumina and has used Infinity data to analyze patient samples to further resolve the underlying genetic variation creating another powerful tool for more informed clinical decision-making to improve patient outcomes. Euan Ashley, MD, PhD, Professor of Genomics and Precision Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, presented data generated from Infinity technology in his keynote address at AGBT on June 6.

Optimized WGS performance with NovaSeq 6000 and best-in-class informatics

Illumina's NovaSeq 6000and DRAGEN Bio-IT platform are addressing some of today's biggest global health challenges, including genetic disease diagnosis, cancer detection and treatment, and global pathogen surveillance. Illumina's recent progress in informatics is also optimizing human WGS analysis.

In a June 9 session entitled "Connecting Samples to Genomic Analysis & Interpretation," Illumina will discuss its suite of informatics solutions and highlight its game-changing applications, including DRAGEN v3.10, which provides the most accurate measurement of the genome as measured against Precision FDA benchmarks. In an updated comparison, DRAGEN outperformed all other technologies across all benchmarks and in the difficult major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region. DRAGEN v3.10 continues to deliver industry-leading accuracy across numerous population-scale studies, such as All of Us, Genome England and UK BioBank.As of March 2022, Illumina's customers have processed more than 1.8 million whole genomes through the DRAGEN tools to accelerate the data processing component of sequencing.

Convening and leading critical conversations at AGBT

Illumina will convene and drive critical conversations around genomics innovation, foster industry collaboration, and discuss advances in its genomics technologies through a number of events and discussions at AGBT, including:

"At Illumina, we are pushing genomic technologies to new frontiers to solve the world's biggest health challenges," said Aravanis. "Through our involvement in this year's AGBT, we look forward to engaging with leading genomics innovators and thinkers about the next-generation genomics solutions that are driving the future of personalized medicine and the ways we can scale these critical innovations to transform health outcomes around the world."

Use of forward-looking statements

This release may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Among the important factors to which our business is subject that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements are: (i) challenges inherent in developing, manufacturing, and launching new products and services, including expanding or modifying manufacturing operations and reliance on third-party suppliers for critical components; and (ii) legislative, regulatory and economic developments, together with other factors detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent filings on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, or in information disclosed in public conference calls, the date and time of which are released beforehand. We undertake no obligation, and do not intend, to update these forward-looking statements, to review or confirm analysts' expectations, or to provide interim reports or updates on the progress of the current quarter.

About Illumina

Illumina is improving human health by unlocking the power of the genome. Our focus on innovation has established us as a global leader in DNA sequencing and array-based technologies, serving customers in the research, clinical and applied markets. Our products are used for applications in the life sciences, oncology, reproductive health, agriculture and other emerging segments. To learn more,visitwww.illumina.comand connect with us onTwitter,Facebook,LinkedIn,Instagram, andYouTube.

Investors:Salli Schwartz858.291.6421[emailprotected]

Media:Adi RavalUS: 202.629.8172[emailprotected]

SOURCE Illumina, Inc.

Read more here:
Illumina Announces Next Generation Products and Data at AGBT General Meeting to Advance Innovative Customer Solutions - PR Newswire

Read More...

AdhereTech and Massive Bio, Two of NYC Digital Health 100 most Promising Start-Ups, Announce AI-Enabled, Patient-Centric Oncology Solutions…

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Massive Bio, Inc., a leader in precision medicine and artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled patient-centric clinical trial enrollment for oncology, and AdhereTech, a pioneer and leading provider of smart devices that connect patients to care with real-time interventions, announced their partnership to provide advanced, data-driven digital health technology solutions, focusing in oral oncolytic agents providing real-time integrated access to care for cancer patients to precision oncology drugs and leading-edge clinical trials. Both companies were recognized in the 2022 NYC Digital Health 100 which showcases the most exciting digital health companies in the New York region.

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220607005289/en/

Massive Bio and AdhereTech, two of NYC Digital Healths 100 most promising start-ups, announce a partnership to provide integrated access to precision oncology care for cancer patients. (Photo: Business Wire)

Massive Bio and AdhereTech have committed to combining their products and services to offer global, comprehensive solutions to measure, analyze and monitor precision oncology medication adherence for patients participating in clinical trials and those prescribed commercially available treatments. Both companies currently are contracted with leading pharmaceutical companies and major specialty pharmacies. Their work with payers, pharmacies and pharmaceutical companies to develop adherence programs utilizing device generated data to optimize processes and improve cost-effective measures for specialty drug and clinical trial programs that may save the industry hundreds of billions of dollars per year.

While the conversation around digital health and pharma has expanded well beyond from adherence, in oncology it provides the link between cost-effective treatments, and an opportunity to prioritize clinical trials when most appropriate mentioned Selin Kurnaz, CEO and Co-Founder of Massive Bio. Even modest improvements can lead to huge cost savings for payers and the pharmaceutical research industry, while allowing streamlined access in real time to effective on-label precision oncology treatments. It is a win-win situation for all stakeholders, from patients to specialty pharmacies, payers, and the commercial and cancer research ecosystem. AdhereTech is one of the few companies that is successfully achieving those goals, and we are excited about this collaboration.

With over 13,000 active cancer clinical trials in the US at any given time, and dozens of biomarkers and precision oncology molecules under study, Massive Bio aims to use AI and patient-centric concierge services at scale to reach cancer patients globally and accelerate the oncology research and development infrastructure. Massive Bio had recently announced the launch of its NASA-style Oncology Clinical Trial Command Center (OCTCC) to disrupt and accelerate trial enrollment, and also the launch of its 100K Cancer Clinical Trial Singularity Program aimed at matching 100,000 cancer patients in real-time to cutting-edge clinical trials using its Massive Bios AI-based technology, website and apps across iOS and Android platforms, expanding their presence as a global company with country-level success in 12 markets.

AdhereTech is a leader in medication programs, providing commercialized digital solutions to measure and manage medication adherence in a variety of settings, including academics, clinical trials, and commercially prescribed treatments. It develops and produces treatment management solutions utilizing smart devices with integrated cellular technology that, seamlessly, connects patients in real time to confirm when patients take their medication and provides two-way communications to ensure dosing regimens are followed and reports and escalates the reasons for and missed doses.

The Aidia System creates personalized patient support with specialty pharmacies and healthcare teams, enabling timely health interventions when they are necessary, and clinical trials can benefit from those key interventions, said Chris OBrien, Chief Executive Officer of AdhereTech. Upon learning of Massive Bios traction in the oncology space, and the opportunities of using our Aidia System, expansive network, and real-world data to help patients, physicians and the cancer research industry at a technology enabled scale, it made absolute sense to explore and operationalize this partnership.

Our AI-enabled clinical trial and precision oncology therapy-finding technology works at its best when paired up with real-time patient-reported insights said Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, M.D., Co-Founder of Massive Bio. By leveraging real-time data from AdhereTechs Smart Adherence System in combination with our SYNERGY-AI cancer trial matching platform, we can identify key opportunities for clinical trial enrollment, while also optimizing medication adherence and access in both precision oncology care, and cancer research.

At AdhereTech, we strive to bring data, analytics and new technologies to market to serve patients and life science companies with better resources in the vital clinical research and treatment realms said Gregory Gallo, Chief Revenue Officer of AdhereTech. Were excited to partner with a cutting-edge solutions provider in the critical oncology therapeutic category. Collaborating, integrating technology and resources will serve to streamline patients journeys and achieve more consistent engagement, enhance care and ultimately improve outcomes and scientific advances, added Gallo.

About AdhereTech

AdhereTech is a privately held digital health company headquartered in New York, NY, and is the leading provider and pioneer of smart devices that connect patients to care via real-time interventions. AdhereTech partners with pharmaceutical manufacturers, specialty pharmacies and healthcare teams with the mission of using technology informed by insights into human behavior to improve health outcomes. Its Aidia SystemTM is a proven, integrated technology-based adherence solution that empowers patients and healthcare teams to achieve optimal medication success. For more information, please visit us at http://www.adheretech.com. You can also follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter, @AdhereTech.

About Massive Bio

Massive Bios (https://massivebio.com/) mission is to provide access to clinical trials for every cancer patient regardless of his/her location and/or financial stability. Massive Bio is an AI-driven platform connecting cancer patients and their oncologists to bio-pharmaceutical clinical trials, yielding profound improvement in access and match rates, leading to faster drug development timelines, and creating a novel oncology data ecosystem for improved protocol design and real-world insights. Massive Bio controls the patient enrollment value chain starting with patient identification, following with AI-based virtual pre-screening outside the site, and resolving last mile issues for clinical trial enrollment. While improving cancer patients lives, Massive Bio serves over two dozen pharmaceutical companies, contract research organizations (CROs) and hospital networks. In addition, Massive Bio has been awarded an SBIR contract by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to develop and characterize its Deep Learning Clinical Trial Matching System (DLCTMS), Contract No. 75N91020C00016. Selected to the "Digital Health 100" by New York City Health Business Leaders, Massive Bio provides oncology dedicated patient recruitment, site selection, real-world data services, and AI-based trial prescreening services to its enterprise customers. Massive Bio was founded in 2015, is headquartered in NYC, and is privately funded by strategic and financial investors. Follow Massive Bio on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220607005289/en/

The rest is here:
AdhereTech and Massive Bio, Two of NYC Digital Health 100 most Promising Start-Ups, Announce AI-Enabled, Patient-Centric Oncology Solutions...

Read More...

PreludeDx Presents New DCISionRT Data on the Effectiveness of Endocrine Therapy in DCIS Patients at the ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting – 69News WFMZ-TV

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

DCISionRT with Novel Residual Risk Subtype Identifies Patients Who May Not Benefit from ET after Surgery and Radiation

LAGUNA HILLS, Calif., June 7, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Prelude Corporation (PreludeDx), a leader in molecular diagnostics and precision medicine for early-stage breast cancer, announced compelling results in 926 women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The new information was presented in an oral abstract session at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting at McCormick Place, Chicago, IL.

The results of the study demonstrated that after breast conserving surgery (BCS) patients in the DCISionRT elevated risk group had a significant risk reduction from endocrine therapy (ET), while those patients in the DS low risk group did not have a significant risk reduction from ET.

"For the first time, physicians have access to an enhanced method of identifying which patients may have a significant or minimal benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy based on individual tumor biology," said Pat Whitworth, MD, FACS, ASCO Presenter and Breast Surgical Oncologist Director, Nashville Breast Center; Associate Professor, University of Tennessee; and Managing Partner TME. "The results are meaningful and support a more tailored treatment plan for our DCIS patients."

DCISionRT stratified patients as low risk, neither adjuvant ET nor radiation therapy (RT) resulted in reduced 10-year ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) (5.6% BCS+ET vs BCS alone). Patients in the elevated risk group, benefited from adjuvant ET as well as RT.

"We are excited to share this unique data demonstrating the expanded utility of DCISionRT to guide personalized treatment decisions for DCIS patients," says Dan Forche, President and CEO of PreludeDx. "As precision medicine becomes the new standard of care, we are committed to continuous innovation to improve healthcare outcomes for early-stage breast cancer patients, clinicians and the healthcare system."

About DCISionRT for Breast DCIS

DCISionRT is the only risk assessment test for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that predicts radiation therapy benefit. Patients with DCIS have cancerous cells lining the milk ducts of the breast, but they have not spread into surrounding breast tissue. In the US, over 60,000 women are newly diagnosed with DCIS each year. DCISionRT, developed by PreludeDx on technology licensed from the University of California San Francisco, and built on research that began with funding from the National Cancer Institute, enables physicians to better understand the biology of DCIS. DCISionRT combines the latest innovations in molecular biology with risk-based assessment scores to assess a woman's individual tumor biology along with other pathologic risk factors and provide a personalized recurrence risk. The test provides a Decision Scorethat identifies a woman's risk as low or elevated. Unlike other risk assessment tools, the DCISionRT test combines protein expression from seven biomarkers and four clinicopathologic factors, using a non-linear algorithm to account for multiple interactions between individual factors in order to better interpret complex biological information. DCISionRT's intelligent reporting provides a woman's recurrence risk after breast conserving surgery alone and with the addition of radiation therapy. In turn, this new information may help patients and their physicians to make more informed treatment decisions.

About PreludeDx

PreludeDx is a leading personalized breast cancer diagnostics company dedicated to serving breast cancer patients and physicians worldwide. Founded in 2009 with technology licensed from University of California San Francisco, PreludeDx has focused on developing precision breast cancer tools that will impact a patient's treatment decision. Our mission is to provide patients and physicians with innovative technologies that improve patient outcomes and reduce the overall cost burden to the healthcare system. Before making a treatment decision, Know Your Risk. PreludeDx is a Fjord Ventures portfolio company.

For more information on how PreludeDx is making a difference for patients, please visit the Company's website: https://preludedx.com and follow us on Twitter @PreludeDx, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn.

PreludeDx, the PreludeDx logo, DCISionRT, the DCISionRT logo, Decision Score, The DCIS Test, Know Your Risk and Your Biology, Your Decision are trademarks of Prelude Corporation or its wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States and foreign countries.

Media Contact

Investor Contact

Cory Dunn

Andrew Wade

760.705.7464

949.600.8925

cdunn@preludedx.com

awade@preludedx.com

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/preludedx-presents-new-dcisionrt-data-on-the-effectiveness-of-endocrine-therapy-in-dcis-patients-at-the-asco-2022-annual-meeting-301562715.html

SOURCE PreludeDx

View post:
PreludeDx Presents New DCISionRT Data on the Effectiveness of Endocrine Therapy in DCIS Patients at the ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting - 69News WFMZ-TV

Read More...

Time to Rethink Metformin as First-Line Therapy? Perspective from ADA 2022 – Endocrinology Network

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

Less than 2 weeks ahead of the American Diabetes Association 82nd Scientific Sessions, new data from the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) provided insight into 21 years of follow-up from more than 3,200 adults with prediabetes. As with previous data releases from the program, the new data drew a lot of attention and, for many, it was because the results fly in the face of conventional wisdom: neither lifestyle interventions nor metformin reduced the cardiovascular disease risk among these patients.

With both of these approaches proven to provide benefit for reducing risk of type 2 diabetes, metformin and lifestyle interventions have established themselves as integral parts of treatment algorithms for many patients with diabetes. However, in recent years a new emphasis has been placed on not only addressing subpar glycemic control in patients with diabetes, but addressing the inherent cardiovascular and renal risk in these patients through use of newer agents, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors.

With this in mind, Endocrinology Network asked a trio of experts in diabetes and cardiometabolism what they thought of the recent data from DPPOS and whether or not it is time to shift away from metformin being a first-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes towards a newer agent or agents. The responses of these experts, Juan Frias, MD, of National Research Institute, W. Timothy Garvey, MD, of University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Hiddo Heerspink, PharmD, PhD, of Groningen University in the Netherlands, can be found below.

Juan Frias, MD: That is a great question. My answer would be that metformin is very inexpensive, and oftentimes free, and it is very effective in lowering the glucose. In your patients, particularly your patients with very high glucose, usually you get a greater reduction, but that's known for any medication that can do very well from a glycemic perspective with metformin.

What I would say is that we should not use metformin and delay the use of those agents, such as a GLP-1 or an SGLT2 inhibitor, in patients who are appropriate and need those agents. So, don't use metformin, to the exclusion of using the other agent. I think it could be certainly be an adjunct in a lot of patients because it does improve clearly improves glycemic control. Again, it's generic, it's inexpensive, and I would say that it's going to continue to be used. Sulfonylureas continued to be used, and I certainly think those should be phased out before metformin gets phased out.

So, we need to just make sure as the guidelines tell us, irrespective of the HbA1c and irrespective of metformin use, that patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who are at very high risk should be using GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors with proven cardiovascular benefit. In patients with heart failure, they should be using an SGLT2 inhibitor. In patients with chronic kidney disease, an SGLT2 inhibitor and often times a combination of SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist and I think metformin is fine to include there. What you don't want to do is be on metformin for 1-2 years and not add those other agents.

W. Timothy Garvey, MD: Well, that's a good question. But there's a subanalysis of the DPP data looking at patients that lost 10% or more of their body weight, and this subgroup did have a decrease in MACE outcomes: myocardial infarction, non fatal stroke, and this composite cardiovascular outcome measure. So, this data suggests that it boils down to achieving sufficient weight loss to achieve cardiovascular protection. We don't have these data from these weight loss medications at this point.

There is a study called SELECT that's ongoing with semaglutide 2.4, and patients without diabetes, but, again, we won't have those data probably for a couple of years. I also think there is a cardiovascular outcomes trial in process for patients with diabetes for tirzepatide. Again, we're just awaiting those data, but if we can show that these medications, together with lifestyle interventions, achieved sufficient weight loss to put them in the range where we can expect to see cardioprevention, that could be and that should be a game-changer.

I think in terms of how we think about these patients, we need to help increase the access of patients to these evidence-based therapies, which currently for obesity is somewhat limited. Maybe, with these data showing the degree of weight loss, how this weight loss translates in to the prevention, or treatment of obesity related complications, I think payers and healthcare systems are going to be more amenable to making these therapies these interventions available to patients.

Hiddo Heerspink, PharmD, PhD: I think it's time to think about prevention of complications of type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Metformin is a fantastic drug to reduce hyperglycemia, but the outcome data, as you mentioned, is limited. We have fantastic outcome data with SGLT2 inhibitors and fantastic outcome data with GLP-1 receptor agonists.

So, from my perspective, it's really time to rethink our approach for the treatment and the sequencing of tracks. As I've already mentioned, I believe it's about the prevention of outcomes. It's not also prevention of diabetes or new-onset diabetes and we have data from the SGLT2 trials with nondiabetic patients that SGLT2 inhibitors reduced new onset diabetes by over 33%.

So, it's really important to take that into consideration and rethink our approach. Our approach has been traditionally on the timing of when drugs came to market and we have always added all new drug but now with many new drugs showing cardiovascular benefits, it's time to think about which combination for which patients. So, we are really heading into an area of personalized medicine I've received the near future.

These transcripts have been edited for length and clarity.

Original post:
Time to Rethink Metformin as First-Line Therapy? Perspective from ADA 2022 - Endocrinology Network

Read More...

BITS Pilani Hyderabad to conduct ‘Precision Medicine 2022’ event tomorrow – United News of India

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

Hyderabad, June 6 (UNI) Technology Business Incubator Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS) Pilani, Hyderabad has collaborated with American Association for Precision Medicine (AAPM) and World Investors and Entrepreneurs Summit (WISE) to conduct the 'Precision Medicine 2022' event at its campus here on Tuesday with the theme of Precision Medicine, Artificial Intelligence (AI) & the Future of Personalized Health care.This event brings together top experts and thought leaders in precision medicine, life science, biotech, MedTech, and pharma. It is designed to bring the community together and serve as a leading forum for new medical breakthroughs and cutting-edge basic, translational, and clinical research, BITS Pilani said in a release here on Monday.

To fulfill this vision, we will be showcasing thought leaders involved in innovative research, developing new capabilities, and developing technological interventions to speed up the delivery of personal health. The biggest Precision Medicine event will also showcase new solutions to clinical and omics data collection, transfer, storage, analysis, security, and design/implement new Big Data Solutions and AI.UNI KNR CS1206

Here is the original post:
BITS Pilani Hyderabad to conduct 'Precision Medicine 2022' event tomorrow - United News of India

Read More...

Global Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Market to Reach US$2.4 Billion by the Year 2026 – Yahoo Finance

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

ReportLinker

Abstract: What`s New for 2022? - Global competitiveness and key competitor percentage market shares. - Market presence across multiple geographies - Strong/Active/Niche/Trivial.

New York, June 07, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Reportlinker.com announces the release of the report "Global Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Industry" - https://www.reportlinker.com/p05957217/?utm_source=GNW - Online interactive peer-to-peer collaborative bespoke updates - Access to our digital archives and MarketGlass Research Platform - Complimentary updates for one year - Global Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Market to Reach US$2.4 Billion by the Year 2026

- LIS is advanced software that stores and manages data in laboratories, and is used for sending test orders, recording laboratory test results, sorting data in databases. These platforms are widely used by clinics, hospitals and diagnostic laboratories to maintain data related to tests and medical history of patients, track data quality and send laboratory test orders. The demand for LIS is driven by their ability to enhance productivity, allow precise and accurate diagnosis, reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient satisfaction. The global market is poised to register significant growth in the future due to various factors such as rising incidence of chronic diseases, the huge volume of test data obtained from clinical testing, the need for enhanced lab automation and efficiency. The global market for these systems is also propelled by increasing adoption of digital solutions to store, retrieve and maintain data in real-time. These systems are offered by sophisticated analytic tools to deal with healthcare issues and improve overall productivity. The market is gaining from the need to reduce diagnostic errors, use of LIS to boost laboratory workflow efficiency, and incorporation of these systems with EHR systems. However, factors such as high maintenance cost, shortage of skilled professionals, and need for specialized laboratories remain key challenges for the market. On the other hand, huge investments by governments in LIS, increasing need for customized systems with data security functions and availability of advanced platforms are expected to present new growth avenues for the market. Rising adoption of laboratory automation and advances in R&D, particularly in biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, are slated to push the market growth.

- Amid the COVID-19 crisis, the global market for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) estimated at US$1.7 Billion in the year 2022, is projected to reach a revised size of US$2.4 Billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 9.2% over the analysis period. Standalone, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is projected to grow at a 6.6% CAGR to reach US$1.3 Billion by the end of the analysis period. After a thorough analysis of the business implications of the pandemic and its induced economic crisis, growth in the Integrated segment is readjusted to a revised 12.2% CAGR for the next 7-year period. This segment currently accounts for a 41.9% share of the global Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) market. Based on product, standalone LIS segment is poised to hold a major share of the market during the analysis period, owing to key factors such as user-friendly nature, enhanced data security, affordability, and ability to work offline. As standalone LIS are not part of a software package, their ability to work offline augments its implementation. Technological innovations is also expected to further boost demand for standalone LIS. Integrated LIS is projected to witness faster growth during the analysis period. Against a backdrop of rising adoption of EMR, healthcare institutions are striving to achieve interoperability and standardization. This in turn spurred the shift from best-of-breed or standalone LIS to deployment of enterprise-wide integrated LIS. Integrated LIS lower dependencies on interfaces, vendor contracts, and total cost of ownership. The U.S. Market is Estimated at $825.5 Million in 2022, While China is Forecast to Reach $148.5 Million by 2026

- The Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) market in the U.S. is estimated at US$825.5 Million in the year 2022. The country currently accounts for a 52.9% share in the global market. China, the world`s second largest economy, is forecast to reach an estimated market size of US$148.5 Million in the year 2026 trailing a CAGR of 12.2% through the analysis period. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at 7% and 7.6% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 9.1% CAGR while Rest of European market (as defined in the study) will reach US$166.8 Million by the close of the analysis period. The US is at the forefront of adoption of LIS systems and dominates the global market, owing to favorable reimbursement policies in the country, for pathology procedures. The region is exhibiting strong gains on account of technological advancements and expansion of the healthcare sector, encompassing clinical research laboratories and diagnostic centers. Europe is another lucrative market for LIS. Developed countries like Germany for instance, are increasingly embracing automation in healthcare for reducing need for workforce. Healthcare providers in such markets are eagerly focusing on deploying automation like LIS for providing quality care to patients. The LIS market in Asia-Pacific, mainly China, is projected to post the fastest growth rate in the coming years due to extensive penetration of these systems in the region on account of surge in personalized medicine demand in the country and also rapid propagation of cloud LIS. Select Competitors (Total 254 Featured) Cerner Corporation Cirdan Comp Pro Med, Inc. CompuGroup Medical AG Margy Tech Pvt Ltd. McKesson Corporation Meditech Orchard Software Corporation Soft Computer Consultants Inc. Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. XIFIN Inc.

Read the full report: https://www.reportlinker.com/p05957217/?utm_source=GNW

I. METHODOLOGY

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. MARKET OVERVIEW Impact of Covid-19 and a Looming Global Recession The Never-Ending ?Race? Between the Virus & Vaccines Continues. Amidst this Chaotic Battle, Where is the World Economy Heading Now & Beyond? Omicron Variant Brings Back Memories & Fears of the Worst Part of the 2020 Pandemic EXHIBIT 1: Time is of Essence! What We Know So Far - ?Vaccine Efficiency Against New Strains? With New Strains Emerging at an Alarming Rate, Focus Shifts to Booster Doses & Vaccine Tweaking. But How Practical Is It to Implement Them? EXHIBIT 2: With Vaccinated Population Showing Signs of Declining Clinical Protection, Booster Doses Are Emerging Into a Necessity to Restore Vaccine Effectiveness: Number of Booster Doses Administered Per 100 People by Country as of December 2021 With IMF Making an Upward Revision of Global GDP for 2022, Companies Are Bullish About a Continuing Economic Comeback Despite a Prolonging Pandemic EXHIBIT 3: A Strong Yet Uncertain Recovery Shaped by New Variants Comes Into Play: World Economic Growth Projections: (Real GDP, Annual % Change) for 2020 through 2022 Overwhelming COVID-19 Testing Volumes Elevate Demand for Laboratory Information Systems EXHIBIT 4: Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) - Global Key Competitors Percentage Market Share in 2022 (E) Competitive Market Presence - Strong/Active/Niche/Trivial for 254 Players Worldwide in 2022 (E) A Prelude to Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Functions of an Effective LIS Global Laboratory Information Systems Market to Witness Rapid Growth Standalone LIS Holds Major Share Services Segment Dominates the LIS Market, Software to Witness Higher Growth during the Forecast Period On-Premise LIS Holds Major Share Due to Customization Benefits Cloud-based LIS Model to Grow in Prominence due to Many Benefits Offered over Traditional, On-Premise Models US Holds Clear Edge over Other Regions, Asia-Pacific to Exhibit Fastest Growth RECENT MARKET ACTIVITY

2. FOCUS ON SELECT PLAYERS

3. MARKET TRENDS & DRIVERS Introduction of Advanced Technologies Fuel Demand for Laboratory Information Systems Digitization of Healthcare Drives Integration of LIS Accelerating Pace of Digital Pathology Increase Adoption Increasing Concerns Pertaining to Data Integrity Fuel Demand for Laboratory Information Systems Introduction of Stringent Data Protection Guidelines Propel Demand for Laboratory Information System Software Use of Easy to Integrate Laboratory Information Systems Gain Momentum Artificial Intelligence Gains Prominence EXHIBIT 5: AI Spending in Healthcare & Life sciences in US$ Million for Years 2020 & 2025 Burgeoning Population and Rising Incidence of Chronic Diseases: A Key Market Driver for LIS EXHIBIT 6: Fatalities by Heart Conditions - Estimated Percentage Breakdown for Cardiovascular Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease, Stroke, and Others EXHIBIT 7: Global Cancer Incidence: Number of New Cancer Cases in Million for the Years 2018, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035 and 2040 EXHIBIT 8: Breakdown of Total Number of Cancer Cases by Cancer Site: 2020 EXHIBIT 9: Rising Diabetes Prevalence Presents Opportunity for iPSCs Market: Number of Adults (20-79) with Diabetes (in Millions) by Region for 2017 and 2045 Aging Demographics Add to the Global Burden of Chronic Diseases, Presenting Opportunities for Laboratory Information System/LIS market EXHIBIT 10: Expanding Elderly Population Worldwide: Breakdown of Number of People Aged 65+ Years in Million by Geographic Region for the Years 2019 and 2030 Growing Adoption of Laboratory Automation Drives the Need for LIS Rise of Laboratory 4.0 to Spur the Adoption of LIS EXHIBIT 11: World Laboratory Automation Market in US$ Billion for Years 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024 & 2026 Laboratory Information Systems Gain Traction amidst Growing Need to Enhance Workflow Efficiencies and Reduce Costs Rise in Molecular Testing Volumes to Elevate Demand EXHIBIT 12: Global Genetic Testing Market in US$ Million: 2015, 2020, & 2025 Improving Healthcare Expenditure to Turbo Charge Future Growth of the Market EXHIBIT 13: World Healthcare Expenditure (In US$ Billion) for the Years 2017-2023 EXHIBIT 14: Elderly Healthcare Expenditure as a % of GDP Need to Improve Diagnostics Accuracy Increasing Popularity of Enterprise LIS Rise in Consolidation of Healthcare Providers Creates Need for Robust and Comprehensive LIS Growing Emphasis on Personalized Medicine to Support Growth EXHIBIT 15: Global Personalized Medicine Market: Revenues in US$ Million for the Years 2019, 2021, 2023 and 2025 Rise in Investment in R&D Activity to Spur Growth Shortage of Trained Professionals Hinders Adoption Rate

4. GLOBAL MARKET PERSPECTIVE Table 1: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 2: World Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 3: World 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 4: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Standalone by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 5: World Historic Review for Standalone by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 6: World 15-Year Perspective for Standalone by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 7: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Integrated by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 8: World Historic Review for Integrated by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 9: World 15-Year Perspective for Integrated by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 10: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for On-Premise by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 11: World Historic Review for On-Premise by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 12: World 15-Year Perspective for On-Premise by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 13: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Cloud by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 14: World Historic Review for Cloud by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 15: World 15-Year Perspective for Cloud by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 16: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Services by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 17: World Historic Review for Services by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 18: World 15-Year Perspective for Services by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 19: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Software by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 20: World Historic Review for Software by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 21: World 15-Year Perspective for Software by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 22: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Hospital Laboratories by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 23: World Historic Review for Hospital Laboratories by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 24: World 15-Year Perspective for Hospital Laboratories by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 25: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Independent Laboratories by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 26: World Historic Review for Independent Laboratories by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 27: World 15-Year Perspective for Independent Laboratories by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 28: World Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Other End-Uses by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 29: World Historic Review for Other End-Uses by Geographic Region - USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 30: World 15-Year Perspective for Other End-Uses by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for USA, Canada, Japan, China, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

III. MARKET ANALYSIS

UNITED STATES Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Market Presence - Strong/ Active/Niche/Trivial - Key Competitors in the United States for 2022 (E) Market Analytics Table 31: USA Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 32: USA Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 33: USA 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Standalone and Integrated for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 34: USA Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 35: USA Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 36: USA 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for On-Premise and Cloud for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 37: USA Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 38: USA Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 39: USA 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Services and Software for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 40: USA Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 41: USA Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 42: USA 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

CANADA Table 43: Canada Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 44: Canada Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 45: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Standalone and Integrated for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 46: Canada Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 47: Canada Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 48: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for On-Premise and Cloud for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 49: Canada Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 50: Canada Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 51: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Services and Software for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 52: Canada Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 53: Canada Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 54: Canada 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

JAPAN Table 55: Japan Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 56: Japan Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 57: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Standalone and Integrated for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 58: Japan Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 59: Japan Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 60: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for On-Premise and Cloud for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 61: Japan Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 62: Japan Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 63: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Services and Software for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 64: Japan Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 65: Japan Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 66: Japan 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

CHINA Table 67: China Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 68: China Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 69: China 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Standalone and Integrated for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 70: China Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 71: China Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 72: China 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for On-Premise and Cloud for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 73: China Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 74: China Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Services and Software Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 75: China 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Component - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Services and Software for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 76: China Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 77: China Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 78: China 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by End-Use - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Hospital Laboratories, Independent Laboratories and Other End-Uses for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

EUROPE Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Market Presence - Strong/ Active/Niche/Trivial - Key Competitors in Europe for 2022 (E) Market Analytics Table 79: Europe Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Geographic Region - France, Germany, Italy, UK and Rest of Europe Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 80: Europe Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Geographic Region - France, Germany, Italy, UK and Rest of Europe Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 81: Europe 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for France, Germany, Italy, UK and Rest of Europe Markets for Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 82: Europe Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 83: Europe Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Standalone and Integrated Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 84: Europe 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Product - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for Standalone and Integrated for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

Table 85: Europe Recent Past, Current & Future Analysis for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for the Years 2020 through 2027 and % CAGR

Table 86: Europe Historic Review for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - On-Premise and Cloud Markets - Independent Analysis of Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2012 through 2019 and % CAGR

Table 87: Europe 15-Year Perspective for Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) by Deployment - Percentage Breakdown of Value Revenues for On-Premise and Cloud for the Years 2012, 2021 & 2027

The rest is here:
Global Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) Market to Reach US$2.4 Billion by the Year 2026 - Yahoo Finance

Read More...

Medical Nutrition Market Promising Growth Opportunities and Forecast 2027 – Digital Journal

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

Medical Nutrition Market: Complementarity of Pharmacology & Nutrition to Augur Well for Growth

As old health rules are overturned, a physiological approach that starts from health in place of disease is gaining high emphasis. Hippocrates quote, Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food has been put into practice, as individuals are considering medical nutrition and food for enhancing health and treating disease, despite the developments procured in the field of medical science.

Get Brochure of the Report @ https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=1704

The idea of disease prevention to avoid or simplify complicated therapeutics is supported by the convergence of the pharmaceutical and food industry. In the past years, literatures have stated that the gap between nutrition science and pharmacology has been narrowing, a progress stirred by both disciplines. The only substances considered pharmacologically active in the past were drugs. Progressing on these terms, medical nutrition, the new treatment pattern entails on the fact that nutrients can have an intense effect on metabolic, immunological and other pathophysiological processes of unhealthy patients.

TMR, in its new research study, reveals compelling insights into the medical nutrition space, to assist readers with data-driven decision making. According to the TMR study, revenues from the medical nutrition market closed in on a valuation of over US$ 13,000 Mn in 2018. This growth is attributed to the growing awareness of chronic diseases among consumers coupled with the various initiatives and programs commenced for the effective prevention and control of these diseases. This has led to the growing inclination towards medical nutrition supplements.

Developments in biotechnology has further resulted in the revolution of the medical nutrition market as key manufacturers are concentrating on research and development of improved and personalized medical nutrition offerings. Moreover, the development of disease-specific specialized solution for the medical nutrition markets is also observed, particularly in the developed economies.

Enquiry Before Buying: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=EB&rep_id=1704

From industry giants to first-movers, enterprises have long been in mercy of revolutionizing industry trends. Key trends shaping the medical nutrition landscape are discussed below.

Get COVID-19 Analysis https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=1704

The digestive wellness trend embodies the increasing awareness around new ingredients, nutritional products which are based on the public health recommendations and science. This is led to the reduction of sugar content of foods. According to reports, a large part of the consumer base prefers the consumption of health-improving ingredients through food, as consumers care about nutrition with which they gain a control over their health and lifestyle. Foods that help reduce the gastrointestinal symptoms including the free-from foods, added-benefits ingredients,fermented foods, prebiotics, andprobioticsare gaining focus with this trend.

Driven by key developments in technology along with the continual progress attained by the field of science, the personalized medical nutrition has become much more than just a concept. Medical nutrition solutions providers are incorporating multidisciplinary approach to set up centers that focus on development of nutritional products that cater to specific needs. The future of personalized medical nutrition is cited to be fully individualized backed with constant monitoring of personalized information including gut bacteria, biomarkers or genes.

Explore More Related Reports:

Vegetable Oils Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/vegetable-oil-market.htmlHerbal Extracts in Nutraceuticals Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/herbal-extracts-in-nutraceuticals-market.htmlMoringa Supplements Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/moringa-supplements-market.htmlChelated Minerals Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/chelated-minerals-market.htmlLivestock Cake Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/livestock-cake-market.html

About Us:

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through adhoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach right decision

Contact:

Rohit BhiseyTransparency Market Research Inc.CORPORATE HEADQUARTER DOWNTOWN,1000 N. West Street,Suite 1200, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 USATel: +1-518-618-1030USA Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453Email:[emailprotected]Website:https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

View post:
Medical Nutrition Market Promising Growth Opportunities and Forecast 2027 - Digital Journal

Read More...

57% of Organizations in India are at the Startup Stage of Genomics High-Performance Computing Infrastructure – APN News

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

Published on June 7, 2022

Bengaluru: A new whitepaper, commissioned by Lenovo & Intel, led by IDC, highlights key challenges and drivers transforming the healthcare landscape across Asia Pacific. Titled Leveraging High-Performance Compute Infrastructure to Address the Genomic Data Challenge in Life Sciences, the paper underlines humanitys greatest challenges where genomics research-led intervention could impact significantly. A key highlight from the paper states that while the pandemic-led acceleration in innovation has given a boost to the Indian healthcare sector, genomics high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructure that is key to drug/vaccine discovery & precision medicine, is still at a startup stage for nearly 57% of surveyed organizations in India. This trend is also seen across a few other APAC regions surveyed: Japan and Korea lead in having advanced (3+ years) infrastructure.

The survey was conducted across 150 pharmaceutical and biotech companies across five key markets in Asia India, Singapore, Thailand, Japan, and Korea.

Genomics and Humanitys Greatest Challenges:

When it comes to solving biggest challenges facing societies and mankind, 40% of decision makers in India are certain that genomics is fundamental to developing a precision medicine strategy to treat chronic illness, rare diseases, and lifestyle disorders. Unsurprisingly, 33% of the organizations surveyed across Asia Pacific mirror this drift, followed by 21% who believe genomics can improve development of drugs and vaccines which is also a priority for 20% organizations in India.

Distinctive aspects discovered in the white paper point to the expansive potential of genomics. One being able to impact hunger and malnutrition, which has been ranked as the second greatest challenge across 40% of decision makers. According to 30% of surveyed leaders in India, genomics could also be a game-changer in helping to improve the environment as climate change continues to be a serious cause of concern.

Commenting on this, Sinisa Nikolic, Director and Segment Leader, HPC & AI, AP, Lenovo ISG, said, The volume and type of genomics data generated is unimaginable and to make accurate decisions based on this data requires huge computing power. This gets even more difficult with complex and unscalable solutions that were found to be cautious factors for 50% of organizations in India looking for genomics solutions.

Increasing Genomic Workloads and Storage Capabilities:

The trend towards developing niche, high-value personalized health solutions is expected to boom as 83% of organizations in India anticipate their annual genomics workloads to grow more than 10% over the next two years. Similarly, for 80%, the annual spend on data storage and compute is likely to increase more than 10% in the two-years period.

Sumir Bhatia, President AP, Lenovo ISG, said, One size doesnt fit all, whether at frontend healthcare delivery or backend IT infrastructure. To catchup with the ever-growing data, the required infrastructure setup can immensely add to the capital and operational expenditure. We expect this to be a critical challenge for organizations in India working to enhance their HPC infrastructure. This is where pay-as-you-go models like Lenovo TruScale become crucial so businesses of all sizes can scale up & down as required, and easily manage their operational expenditure to address humanitys greatest challenges.

The growing storage requirement predictions could add to the existing cost burdens for 33% of organizations who are currently spending more than $1M annually on data compute, storage, and maintenance & services. Even with the challenges around scalability, flexibility, and costs, nearly half (46.7%) of the respondents are not looking to acquire new solutions to transform their HPC landscape. Surprisingly, similar feedback was given by 50 percent of the leaders in Asia.

Recognizing IT Challenges and Accelerating Genomics Transformation with HPC:

With a growing focus on making precision medicine a reality, nearly 47% of decision-makers in Indias genomics industry feel that, with the high velocity at which genome data is generated, the lack of computing power to analyze it becomes the biggest infrastructural challenge for genome sequencing. Delving further into the challenges, 40% of the respondents ranked multi-dimensionality of data as the second-big IT challenge.

Close to 97% of respondents in India are using high-performance workstations and nearly 23% also use laptops for data visualization. Interestingly, 46% are using 3D augmented reality/virtual reality (AR/VR) solutions, indicating a growing shift toward immersive visualization techniques, complemented by deep learning to enable molecular modeling and simulations.

A major challenge for researchers is the time taken to process a single genome. Fortunately, solutions like Lenovo Genomics Optimization and Scalability Tool (GOAST) reduce the time to process a single human genome from 150 hours to less than 48 minutes. This enables researchers to quickly map a cohort of people instead of spending time analyzing a single genome. HPC supports high-throughput volumes to accelerate the speed of analysis, whereas AI helps make sense of the difference between genomes. This is why we are seeing GOAST being preferred by nearly 37% of organizations in India and expecting it to grow tremendously over the next few years. Sinisa Nikolic added.

In the entire context of genomics data, cyberthreats are a key challenge for only 3% of the organizations in India, while more than 80% feel strongly of their cybersecurity strategy indicating it as lowest amongst the hurdles.

Go here to read the rest:
57% of Organizations in India are at the Startup Stage of Genomics High-Performance Computing Infrastructure - APN News

Read More...

Cellworks Singula TRI Provides Personalized OS and PFS Predictions for 18 NCCN Guideline GBM Therapies – StreetInsider.com

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

Get instant alerts when news breaks on your stocks. Claim your 1-week free trial to StreetInsider Premium here.

myCare-024-04 Study Finds Cellworks Personalized Biosimulation Provides Superior OS and PFS Predictions for GBM Patients Beyond Standard Clinical Factors

CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Cellworks Group, Inc., a world leader in Personalized Medicine in the key therapeutic areas of Oncology and Immunology, today announced results from the myCare-024-04 study, which demonstrate that the Cellworks Singula Therapy Response Index (TRI) was strongly predictive of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) for newly diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) patients. In this study, Singula TRI provided patient-specific estimates of OS and PFS for 18 NCCN guideline GBM therapies and provided predictive value beyond physician-prescribed therapy, patient age, patient sex, and MGMT methylation status.

The results from the myCare-024-04 clinical study were featured in a poster presentation with comments from Dr. Manmeet Ahluwalia, M.D., M.B.A., Chief of Medical Oncology, Chief Scientific Officer and Deputy Director at Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, at the 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting June 3-7th during the Central Nervous Systems Tumors Session and available online as Abstract 2053.

The molecular heterogeneity of GBM is a key driver for the inconsistent therapy response rates that we see in brain cancer patients and makes the disease difficult to treat, said Patrick Wen, MD, Director, Center for Neuro-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Professor, Neurology, Harvard Medical School; and Co-Principal Investigator for the myCare-024-04 clinical study. But by using a patients NGS data and Cellworks Singula to biosimulate their individual therapy responses, we can potentially improve the ability to select the most effective therapy for each GBM patient and positively effect clinical outcomes for brain cancer patients.

The significant differences in treatment response among GBM patients necessitates moving beyond population-based treatments to personalized multi-gene therapy predictions, said Dr. Manmeet Ahluwalia, M.D., M.B.A., Chief of Medical Oncology, Chief Scientific Officer and Deputy Director at Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida; and Co-Principal Investigator for the myCare-024-04 clinical study. Using Cellworks Singula TRI, we can simulate the molecular effects of cell signaling, drugs and radiation on patient-specific in silico diseased cells prior to treatment and then identify the magnitude of disease control and survival for specific anti-tumor strategies. The findings from using this approach in the myCare-024-04 study suggest that biosimulating guideline GBM therapies for newly diagnosed GBM patients can positively effect clinical outcomes.

The Cellworks Biosimulation Platform simulates how a patient's personalized genomic disease model will respond to therapies prior to treatment and identifies novel drug combinations for treatment-refractory patients. The platform is powered by the groundbreaking Cellworks Computational Omics Biology Model (CBM), a network of 7,000+ human genes, 30,000+ molecular species and 100+ signaling pathways. As part of the biosimulation process, personalized disease models are created for each patient using their cytogenetic and molecular data as input to the Cellworks CBM. The Cellworks platform analyzes the impact of specific therapies on the patients personalized disease model and generates a Singula biosimulation report with Therapy Response Index (TRI) scores from 0 to 100 that predict the efficacy of specific chemotherapies.

myCare-024-04 Clinical Study

Background

In this study, the Cellworks Singula Therapy Response Index (TRI) was used to prospectively predict the Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in a retrospective cohort of 270 IDH wildtype GBM patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with known clinical outcomes treated with physician prescribed therapies. The cohort included 162 males and 108 females with a median age of 57.5 years.

Methods

A mechanistic mulit-omcis biology model created for each patient using comprehensive genomic inputs allows biosimulation of downstream molecular effects of cell signaling, drugs and radiation on a patients personalized in silico disease model. Stratified random sampling was used to split the data into independent training (N=153) and validation (N=117) subjects. Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard and Proportional Odds models were used to model OS and PFS as a function of the pre-defined Singula TRI and clinical thresholds. Cox Proportional Hazards (PH) regression and likelihood ratio (LR) tests were used on the independent validation subjects to assess the hypothesis that Singula is predictive of OS and PFS above and beyond standard clinical factors.

Results

Using Cellworks Personalized Therapy Biosimulation, Singula TRI was significantly predictive of OS and PFS in univariate analyses and remained significantly predictive in multivariate analyses, which included patient age, patient sex, MGMT methylation status and drug class.

Conclusions

Cellworks Singula TRI facilitates selection of optimal personalized therapies by providing patient-specific estimates of OS and PFS for 18 NCCN guideline GBM therapies. This information may be used to estimate increases in OS and PFS when comparing Singula TRI recommended therapies verses standard care. These positive results suggest the utility of biosimulation-informed therapy selection to improve survival of GEA patients.

About Cellworks Group

Cellworks Group, Inc. is a world leader in Personalized Medicine in the key therapeutic areas of Oncology and Immunology. Using innovative multi-omics modeling, computational biosimulation and Artificial Intelligence heuristics, Cellworks predicts the most efficacious therapies for patients. The Cellworks unique biosimulation platform is a unified representation of biological knowledge curated from heterogeneous datasets and applied to finding cures. Backed by UnitedHealth Group, Sequoia Capital, Agilent and Artiman, Cellworks has the worlds strongest trans-disciplinary team of molecular biologists, cellular pathway modelers and software technologists working toward a common goal attacking serious diseases to improve the lives of patients. The company is based in South San Francisco, California and has a research and development facility in Bangalore, India. For more information, visit http://www.cellworks.life and follow us on Twitter @cellworkslife.

All trademarks and registered trademarks in this document are the properties of their respective owners.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220606005437/en/

Barbara ReichertReichert Communications, LLC[emailprotected]415-225-2991

Michele Macpherson, Chief Business OfficerCellworks Group, Inc.[emailprotected]650-346-9980

Source: Cellworks Group, Inc.

Original post:
Cellworks Singula TRI Provides Personalized OS and PFS Predictions for 18 NCCN Guideline GBM Therapies - StreetInsider.com

Read More...

Inspiration for the laboratory of tomorrow – Chemie.de

June 8th, 2022 1:48 am

The forums at analytica invite visitors to practical presentations and panel discussions.

Live in Munich again at last: When analytica, the worlds leading trade fair for laboratory technology, analysis and biotechnology, opens its doors from June 21 to 24, around 900 exhibitors will present their innovations. The industry is particularly looking forward to in-person dialog. There are ample opportunities for this at the trade fair stands, as well as at the analytica conference, in the forums and during the many other accompanying events. Nothing beats a real get-together, says Armin Wittmann, Exhibition Director for analytica. The attractive analytica supporting program brings the laboratory of tomorrow to life and facilitates the exchange of know-how, experience and ideas.

The analytica conference, the scientific high point of analytica, will take place on the first three days of the trade fair in the ICM, right next to the exhibition halls. Whether its nanoplastics, cancer diagnosis or antibiotic-resistant germs in the water cycle: In nearly 200 presentations and a poster show, renowned scientists from all over the world will discuss what modern analytics is capable of today, where its limits currently lie and how these can be overcome in future. The multifaceted program was put together by the German Chemical Society (Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker, GDCh), the German Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Society (Gesellschaft fr Biochemie und Molekularbiologie, GBM) and the German Society for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine e.V. (Deutsche Vereinte Gesellschaft fr Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, DGKL).

The megatrend of digitalization will be a common thread through the analytica conference program, as well as through the exhibition halls. In the Digital Transformation special show in Hall B2, visitors can experience automated workflows, networked devices and robots in action. In the neighboring forum of the same name, Agilent, Merck, Mettler Toledo, Thermo Fisher Scientific and many other companies will explain their concepts for Laboratory 4.0 in 30-minute presentations. The industry association SPECTARIS will provide an overview of the current status of a uniform OPC-UA interface for German manufacturers.

The Biotech forum (Hall A3), the Occupational Health and Safety forum and the analytica forum (both in Hall B1) likewise invite visitors to practical presentations and podium discussions. Among the highlights in the analytica forum are the expert rounds on COVID-19 research on June 22 and 23, with the likes of Professor Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit from the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg and Professor Helga Rbsamen-Schaeff, Leopoldina member and founder and Supervisory Board member of the biopharmaceutical company AiCuris. The exact dates will be announced shortly on the analytica website.

The German biotech industry has emerged as a solution to problems during the pandemic and has collected more capital in the past two years than ever before. The Finance Days on June 23 and 24 at the Biotech forum in Hall A3 will cover financing trends in the life sciences sector and answer questions about initial public offerings and global markets. With the personalized medicine themed day on June 24, analytica is also putting a particular focus on this promising sector. Representatives from associations, clusters and companies in the health care sector will discuss the potential of individualized therapies from various perspectives.

Safety in the laboratory is the number one priority in day-to-day work. The Occupational Health and Safety forum in Hall B2 will be devoted to this topic. This year at analytica, the company asecos will once again demonstrate accidents that can happen if hazardous substances are stored incorrectly in the laboratory live in their daily experimental presentations. There will also be presentations on lithium-ion batteries that are increasingly finding their way into laboratories and whose potential dangers should they be mishandled are often underestimated. The program is rounded out by presentations from companies such as Erlab, Bernd Kraft and a1-environsciences.

Anyone who wants to use analytica as a career booster can combine a trade fair visit with further training. The training and consulting firm Dr. Klinkner & Partner will be offering all-day seminars at analytica on selected topics, from laboratory IT to the validation of analytical methods. And last but not least analytica, together with the scientific society GDCh and the VBio, will be supporting young talent in the industry. As usual, the popular student information day will take place on the last day of the trade fair on June 24. Here, high-school graduates can learn about fields of study and occupational areas in chemistry, biotechnology and food chemistry.

Read more from the original source:
Inspiration for the laboratory of tomorrow - Chemie.de

Read More...

How can Nanotechnology be Used to Reverse Skin Aging? – AZoNano

May 20th, 2022 1:57 am

Although skin aging has not been related to many health complications, it has aesthetic issues. Some of the common symptoms of skin aging are changes in the skin texture (rough, dry, and itchy), discoloration, reduction in skin elasticity, and enhanced susceptibility to bruises.

Image Credit:Claire Adams/Shutterstock.com

Scientists have formulated various nano-based products to reverse, prevent or decelerate the process of skin aging. This article discusses some of the nanotechnology-based approaches to reverse skin aging.

The skin is the outermost cutaneous membrane that covers the bodys surface and provides protection from the external environment. It is primarily classified into three layers, i.e., the outer layer (epidermis), middle layer (dermis), and innermost layer (subcutaneous).

The outer epidermis layer predominantly contains keratinocytes without any blood vessels. The dermis layer contains cellular components and an extracellular matrix. The main components of the dermis include collagen fibers (tensile strength), elastic fibers (elasticity and resilience), glycoproteins (e.g., integrins, and fibulins), and glycosaminoglycans (hydration).

Studies have shown that both endogenous and exogenous factors are associated with the process of skin aging. Intrinsic aging occurs due to changes in the epithelial layers, while extrinsic aging is caused by the abnormal accumulation of elastic fibers in the dermis middle layer. Intrinsic aging is governed by the genetic traits of an individual, along with changes in their hormones and cellular mechanisms.

Some of the hormones related to skin functions are testosterone, estrogen, melatonin, cortisol, and thyroxine. For instance, hypoestrogenism occurs in postmenopausal women, making their skin thinner and drier. Oxidative stress, caused due to continual production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leads to mitochondrial DNA damage and loss of skin elasticity.

Scientists have stated that mitochondrial DNA damage and shortening of telomeres are highly correlated to aging. A decrease in collagen production with aging leads to sagging of skin.

One of the factors associated with extrinsic aging is prolonged sun exposure. The UV rays change the cellular component of the skin and cause discoloration, loss of skin elasticity, deep wrinkling, and loss of hydration. Other lifestyle-related factors, such as sleep, diet, exercise, and smoking, are linked with skin aging. Scientists revealed that smoking damages the collagen and elastic fibers present in the dermis, making the skin loose and dry.

Conventionally, many skin products contain antioxidants to counterbalance the effects of ROS and make the skin look younger. Some of the disadvantages of these skin products are restricted permeability, lack of target-specific delivery, and breakdown of active ingredients with time. Recently, the cosmetic industry, which is popularly referred to as nanocosmeceuticals, has used nanotechnology for the development of various skin products.

Some of the advantages of nanocosmeceuticals include enhanced efficacy and stability of the active ingredients in the skin product. Studies have shown that nanoparticle-based cosmeceutical formulations exhibit superior skin permeability and cause minor side effects.

Scientists have developed several nanoparticle formulations for the cosmetic industry. Some of the nanocarriers developed for anti-aging applications are as follows:

This is a popularly used nanodelivery system that significantly enhances the efficacy of a drug and reduces its side effects. These nanoparticles possess an aqueous core with phospholipid bilayers surrounding them. Liposomes are regarded as an ideal nanocarrier for skincare formulations because of their excellent penetration capacity and biocompatibility. When applied, liposomes bind to the skin cell membranes and release the active ingredients into the cell, which combats wrinkles and promotes the regeneration of skin cells. Many popular high street brands have developed liposome-based anti-aging formulations.

Niosomes are vesicle-like structures, composed of non-ionic surface-active agents. A study related to entrapping rice bran components with antioxidant properties into niosomes revealed promising anti-aging properties.

Typically, ethosomes are used to transport drugs deep into the dermis. These small, malleable nanostructures are used to deliver drugs via the transdermal route. One of the most advantageous properties of this nanostructure is that it can easily penetrate smaller pores of the skin.

In a recent study, scientists loaded rosmarinic acid into ethosomes which exhibited a significant anti-aging effect. This is because ethosomes enhanced the penetration of rosmarinic acid into the skin, and this prevented the degradation of elastin and collagen.

These arepolymeric nanoparticles where active ingredients are covalently attached to the walls. Nanocapsule-based formulations containing various active compounds, for example, Vitamin E, antioxidants, retinoids, and -carotene, have been developed for effective and targeted delivery. The development of an anti-wrinkle cream by encapsulating Vitamin C offers a slow release of the active compound for a prolonged time, preserving skin health for a longer periods.

As the same suggests, these are spherical nanoparticles in which active compounds are distributed throughout the matrix. Poly D, L lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) polymer is popularly used for the development of nanospheres.

Research has shown that Vitamin C-loaded PLGA nanospheres could penetrate melanocytes and fibroblasts in the skin and gradually release the compound. Vitamin C reduces skin blemishes and wrinkles by promoting the formation of collagen and its antioxidant properties reduce ROS levels. Therefore, this formulation has proved to be an effective anti-aging and anti-wrinkle agent.

Scientists have prepared nanoemulsions of grapeseed oil and studied its efficacy in preventing skin aging. They observed that the antioxidant property of grapeseed oil helped to keep the skin healthy. This technology has been used by many brands to develop an effective treatment to cure wrinkles and fine lines of the skin.

Fullerene is a carbon allotrope, composed of spherically attached carbon atoms. A recent study reported that fullerene nanocapsules containing ascorbic acid and Vitamin E exhibited a protective function against premature skin aging.

The rapid advancements in nanocosmeceuticals promise many innovative skin formulations that could effectively reverse skin aging. Researchers are set to discover new bioactive compounds and phytochemicals with excellent anti-aging and antioxidant properties in the future. Additionally, the development of novel nanocarriers will ensure targeted delivery of these compounds and protect them from degradation for a prolonged period.

Sharma, A. et al. (2022) Novel nanotechnological approaches for treatment of skin-aging. Journal of Tissue Viability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2022.04.010

Vaiserman, A. et al. (2021) Phyto-nanotechnology in anti-aging medicine.Aging,13(8), pp. 1081810820. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.203026

Bhatia, E. et al. (2021) Nanoparticle platforms for dermal anti-aging technologies: Insights in cellular and molecular mechanisms. Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1746

Dobke, M. and Hauch, A. (2020) Targeting facial aging with nano and regenerative technologies and procedures. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 7(1). 10.20517/2347-9264.2019.65

Agostini, A. et al. (2012) Targeted Cargo Delivery in Senescent Cells Using Capped Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles.Angewandte Chemie International Edition. DOI:10.1002/anie.201204663

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Read more:
How can Nanotechnology be Used to Reverse Skin Aging? - AZoNano

Read More...

Should Nanomaterial Synthesis Rely on Automation? – AZoNano

May 20th, 2022 1:57 am

Nanoparticles and other nanomaterials are essential components of cutting-edge science and technology, including photochemistry, energy conversion, and medicine. New research suggests that automating nanomaterial synthesis can reduce the environmental footprint of these advanced materials while at the same time improving quality and scalability.

Image Credit:Ico Maker/Shutterstock.com

The groundbreaking paper, Towards automation of the polyol process for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles makes the argument for automated synthesis to enable the manufacturing of colloids with properties that are precisely tunable and crucially for industrial nanomaterial synthesis reproducible.

The study, which was published in the journal Scientific Reports in 2022, could have a significant impact in various fields of science, as the metal nanoparticles its authors synthesized are used at the forefront in photochemistry, energy conversion, and medicine.

The interdisciplinary team behind the paper materials researchers, nanotechnology specialists, and chemical engineers from Germanys Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, and Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlins Department of Chemistry focused their research on silver nanoparticle synthesis.

Silver was a suitable test candidate for the automated synthesis method because, while it is one of the more commonly used nanoparticles due to its antibacterial properties and sensing and catalysis applications, it is difficult to produce in well-defined products. The obstacles to this are silvers high polydispersity: it is difficult to precisely control or tune silver nanoparticles sizes.

Responding to this challenge, the German researchers developed an automatic approach for on-demand silver nanoparticle synthesis. The method enables fabricators to synthesize silver nanoparticles between 3 and 5 nm, employing a modified polyol process.

To test their results, the team employed small-angle X-ray scattering, dynamic light scattering, and a number of other investigations. All results showed that the new automated synthesis method is suitable for yielding reproducible and tunable properties in synthetic colloids.

Synthetic nanomaterials are made with shapes or structural components that measure between 0.1 and 100 nm or 0.1 to 100 billionths of a meter. The metal nanoparticles that the present research focuses on find numerous applications in research, medicine, and technology contexts.

Synthesis methods for nanoparticles have to provide a high degree of control over the nanoparticles size, shape, and polydispersity while limiting the effects of aggregation or agglomeration (ensuring an even distribution). They also need to take into account the rheological properties of nanoparticle dispersions and the long-term stability of the solution.

Challenges with synthesizing nanoparticles include reproducibility and colloidal stability. These challenges mean there are limited nanoparticle-based references available, despite calls for such materials from environmental, health, and safety concerns for a number of years.

For example, gold nanoparticles are ubiquitous in nanotechnology due to their straightforward synthesis requirements, distinct size regulation, and ability to realize predictable nanoparticle sizes and dispersion.

But, despite a high demand due to silvers well-known antibacterial properties and use in catalysis, photochemistry, sensing, and optoelectronics, silver nanoparticles remain difficult to synthesize with available methods.

One available method is based on a polyol process. Here, silver nanoparticles are formed by reducing silver ions in the presence of polyacrylic acid in hot ethylene glycol. The ethylene glycol acts as both a reducing agent and a solvent.

This method is considered important because it stabilizes nanoparticles in a water-based solution by adjusting the solutions pH balance to 10, creating a negatively charged shell that means particles can remain unchanged in the suspension for over six months.

As a result, the nanoparticles produced make good candidates for reference materials. Reference materials are used in nanomaterial synthesis to quantify the size, distribution, and concentration of nanoparticles in doped materials.

Reference materials need to be made in bulk and able to remain stable for a long period of time in storage to be useful. The adapted polyol process described above can achieve these requirements, although it is not best suited for the task.

To develop reference materials like silver nanoparticles faster, researchers focused on developing an automated platform for rapid on-demand synthesis.

An automated platform could avoid the need for bulk quantities and long-term stability by offering required reference materials to researchers at minimal cost and without excessive lead-in times.

It would also enable targeted testing of nanomaterials physicochemical properties and a shorter development cycle before arriving at the desired properties.

To achieve this, the German scientists developed an automated silver nanoparticle synthesis method with the polyol process producing a colloidally stable silver.

They deployed the so-called Chemputer for the first time in the field of inorganic chemistry. The Chemputer is an automated platform that was developed by the Cronin group to execute multi-step, solution-based organic synthesis and purification tasks.

The Chemputer works in a batch mode with common laboratory items like heaters and glassware connected to a backbone made out of HPLC selection valves and syringe pumps. Liquid solutions are transferred across the backbone and manipulated along its various modules in different ways.

Every operation is controlled with a software script, which ensures a high rate of reproducibility. The accompanying software also makes it easy to adjust the synthesis conditions as required and documents all changes in the reaction log file.

Caldern-Jimnez, B. et al. (2017). Silver nanoparticles: Technological advances, societal impacts, and metrological challenges. Frontiers in Chemistry. doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00006.

Dong, H. et al. (2015). Polyol synthesis of nanoparticles: Status and options regarding metals, oxides, chalcogenides, and non-metal elements. Green Chemistry. doi.org/10.1039/C5GC00943J.

Kaabipour, S., and S. Hemmati (2021). A review on the green and sustainable synthesis of silver nanoparticles and one-dimensional silver nanostructures. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.12.9.

Wolf, J.B., et al. (2022). Towards automation of the polyol process for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Scientific Reports. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09774-w.

You, H., and J. Fang (2016). Particle-mediated nucleation and growth of solution-synthesized metal nanocrystals: A new story beyond the LaMer curve. Nano Today. doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2016.04.003.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Read the original:
Should Nanomaterial Synthesis Rely on Automation? - AZoNano

Read More...

Fabrication Methods of Ceramic Nanoparticles – AZoNano

May 20th, 2022 1:57 am

Ceramic nanoparticles are generally composed of metals and metal oxides, silicon carbide, nitrates, and carbonates like magnesium, chromium, and silicate. Because of their beneficial qualities, including strong heat tolerance and chemical stability, they have a wide variety of uses. There are a number of techniques widely used to synthesize nanoparticles of different ceramic materials.

Image Credit:GiroScience/Shutterstock.com

Ceramics are defined as having a definite solid core, arranged by the applying heat or even both heat and pressure, and consisting of a metallicand non-metallic mixture. Ceramic nanoparticles are made up of inorganic substances like aluminosilicate and are very prone to external disturbances.

Nevertheless, the nanoparticle center is not restricted to these two substances; instead, metals, metallicoxides, and metal sulfur compounds may be employed to create nanostructures of various sizes, forms, and permeability.

Ceramic nanoparticles have many benefits, including simple fabrication with appropriate size, form, and pores, and no influence on dilatation or permeability with pH values. The production of novelceramic materials for biological applications has increased rapidly in recent years.

Controlled drug discharge is among the most explored areas of ceramic nanoparticles use in bioscience, where dosage and structure are critical. Long-term stability, relatively high loadingcapability, facile inclusion of hydrophilic and hydrophobic networks, and various delivery routes are all characteristics that make these nanostructures a promising tool in managing drug release.

Usually, ceramic nanoparticles are created via solid-state processes. Raw ingredients such as oxide, hydroxide, nitrate, sulfate, or carbonate are physically combined and then processed at elevated temperatures for extended timespansto allow the nanoparticles to form. This process produces coarse-sized,aggregated nanoparticles with a reduced specificarea.

The employment of elevated temperatures to create solid-state compoundsoften results in irregular grain development and a loss of stoichiometriccontrol. Numerous modified chemical fabrication procedures have been devised to create ceramic nanoparticles with an acceptable shape at low temperatures.

The sol-gel procedure, also termed chemical solution deposition, is one method for creating nanoceramics. This comprises a liquid solution, or sol, composed of liquid-phase nanostructures and a predecessor, often a gel or polymer composed of particles submerged in a liquid.

The sol and gel are combined to form an oxide substance, which is a sort of ceramic, and the byproductis vaporized. The majority of the nanoparticles are then warmed in a procedure termed densification to generate a quality product. This process might potentially be used to create a nanocomposite by burning the gel on top of a thin layer to build a nanoceramic coating.

Another way is two-photon lithography, which employs a laser to scrape a polymer into a three-dimensional pattern. The lasers strengthen the areas it hits but keep the remainder unhardened. The unhardened substance is then dispersed to form a "shell." The shell is then covered with ceramics, alloys, metallic crystals, and so forth. The final ceramic nanotruss may be crushed and returned to its original condition.

High-temperature sintering has also been utilized to solidify nanoceramic particles. This produced a rough substance that harmed the characteristics of ceramics and increased the duration required to produce a final product. This approach also restricts the final geometry that may be created. Microwave sintering was devised to address such issues.

A magnetron generates energy by vibrating and heating the particles with electromagnetic waves. Rather than transferring heat externally, this approach instantaneously transfers heat over the entire quantity of data.

The apparatus for the fabrication is made up of many elements. For instance, the major component of the arrangement proposed by Rasche et al. (2020) is a three-zone heated flow tube reactor positioned vertically. It has a span of 6 m and can achieve temperatures of up to 1700 degrees Celsius. As individualized energy input into the separate zones is possible, the three-zone heating configuration promotes a homogenous temperature distribution.

The reaction zone for the synthesis method is an Al2O3 tube with an internal diameter of 105 millimeters. Because of its relatively strong heat transmission and damage tolerance, Al2O3 is an excellent option. Both sides of the tubes, and the fittings, are insulated with ceramics wool to prevent heat leaks and promote a consistent temperature distribution.

It must be noted that, in addition to reducing thermal losses, insulation contributes to a prolonged tube lifespan by preventing significant axial temperature differences. The processing gas is warmed to roughly 500 degrees Celsius for the same reason. To preserve the tube's longevity, heating and cooling rates must not exceed 300 K/h, which is accomplished by careful power regulation.

Synthesis and processing are critical concerns in nanotechnology to harness the unique features of nanoparticles and realize their promising utility in research and technology. Many technical strategies for fabricating nanoparticles have been investigated.

There are some fundamental issues associated with the fabrication of ceramic nanoparticles utilizing any method or technology. These include a lack of controllability of nanoparticle size and structure, and the inability to manipulate the form of synthesized nanoparticles and particle size distribution. Moreover, the toxicity of the synthesized nanoparticles is also a key concern concerning real-world biomedical applications.

Addressing these concerns is critical in developing an optimal fabrication process for ceramic nanoparticles.

Rasche, D. B., Tigges, L., & Schmid, H.-J. (2020). An apparatus to synthesize ceramic nanoparticles with a precisely adjusted temperature history and a significant mass output. Review of Scientific Instruments. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5133438

Singh, D., Singh, S., & Singh, M. R. (2016). Ceramic nanoparticles: Recompense, cellular uptake and toxicity concerns. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/21691401.2014.955106

Thomas, S. C., Harshita, Mishra, P. K., & Talegaonkar, S. (2015). Ceramic Nanoparticles: Fabrication Methods and Applications in Drug Delivery. Current Pharmaceutical Design. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612821666151027153246

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

View original post here:
Fabrication Methods of Ceramic Nanoparticles - AZoNano

Read More...

Explained: What are nanobots and how they can be used to help clean teeth? – Firstpost

May 20th, 2022 1:57 am

FP ExplainersMay 17, 2022 16:48:58 IST

If all goes as planned, root canal procedures may not be as painful as before. Researchers at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) in Bengaluru have developed tiny nanobots to help with root canal treatments.

However, what are nanobots? What role do they play? Why are they being called the future of medicine?

We provide the answer to these questions and explain how nanobots are being used to help clean teeth.

Nanobots explained

Nanobots are robots that are microscopic in nature, measured largely on the scale of nanometers. Nanobots are also known as nanomachines, nanorobots, nanomites, nanites or nanoids.

According to Techopedia, the idea behind nanobots is in having a device which can interact at the nano scale and help in understanding or manipulating structures at the nanoscale level.

Most theoreticians credit the concept of nanotechnology to physicist Richard Feynman and his speech in 1959 entitled: Theres Plenty of Room at the Bottom. In the speech, Feynman predicted the development of machines that could be miniaturised and huge amounts of information being encoded in minuscule spaces. However, it was K Eric Drexlers 1986 book, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology, which galvanised nanotechnological doctrine.

The size of nanobots has made their application most relevant in the field of medical science. Experts note that they can be used to aid in research related to cancer, AIDS and other major diseases as well as in helping brain, heart and diabetes research.

Besides medicine, nanobots can be of use are in the field of aerospace, security, defence, electronics and environmental protection.

Using nanobots for dental care

On Monday, researchers at IISc announced that they had created nanobots that can be utilised to fit through the dentinal tubules and kill bacteria.

An NDTV report said that the researchers had created nanobots, made from silicon dioxide and coated with iron which can be controlled by a device that creates a low intensity magnetic field. This new technique and study has been published by the journal Advanced Healthcare Materials.

Explaining how it worked, the researchers said that the nanobots, developed at IISc-incubated startup Theranautilus, were injected into extracted tooth samples and their movement was tracked using a microscope.

IISc said that by tweaking the frequency of the magnetic field, the researchers were able to make the nanobots move at will, and penetrate deep inside the dentinal tubules. They manipulated the magnetic field to make the surface of the nanobots generate heat, which can kill the bacteria nearby.

Hailing the success of their research, Ambarish Ghosh, professor at the Centre for Nano Science and Engineering, who led the research was quoted as telling NDTV, These studies have shown that they are safe to use in biological tissues. We are very close to deploying this technology in a clinical setting, which was considered futuristic even three years ago. It is a joy to see how a simple scientific curiosity is shaping into a medical intervention that can impact millions of people in India alone.

Other use of nanobots in medicine

Other than using nanobots in dentistry, scientists have also used nanobots to fight bacteria in a wound.

Researchers from the Institute of Bioengineering of Catalonia, in a study published in ACS, said that they had used the nanobots to deliver the necessary medicinal compounds to the wound by plunging into a liquid medium and thereby destroying pathogens.

In December 2021, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Education and Research (MIMER), Pune had developed a nano robot that is programmed to capture and isolate circulating tumor cells.

The tool was hailed as it would lead to a new rapid and accurate diagnostic method for cancer.

With inputs from agencies

Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News,India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Continue reading here:
Explained: What are nanobots and how they can be used to help clean teeth? - Firstpost

Read More...

Understanding the Health Risks of Graphene – AZoNano

May 20th, 2022 1:56 am

Graphene is a two-dimensional (2D) carbon nanomaterial, which is often referred to as super material or wonder material. Due to its unique characteristics, graphene is applied in many branches of science and technology, which makes understanding its health risks a critical aspect of its use.

Image Credit:Yurchanka Siarhei/Shutterstock.com

Graphene is a carbon allotrope with a thickness of a single atom, arranged in a honeycomb-like orientation. To date, the majority of carbon nanomaterials developed are based on graphene. Some of the key advantageous features of graphene are that it can be stacked, rolled, or wrapped to form various structures, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which are used in many industries.

As mentioned above, graphene is used in many innovative applications, including nanoelectronics, energy technology that has improved energy storage systems (e.g., highly effective batteries), medical utilities (e.g., antibacterial agents), and the development of composite materials and sensors.

Apart from the aforementioned applications, graphene has been widely applied in biomedical research. For instance, it is used in drug/gene delivery and the development of biocompatible scaffolds for cell culture and biological sensors to detect biomolecules.

Scientists reported that graphene oxide (GO), which is synthesized by fast oxidation of graphite, is an ideal nanocarrier for the efficient delivery of drugs/genes. Gene therapy is a novel approach utilized in the treatment of genetic disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, cystic fibrosis, and cancer.

Owing to the unique properties, such as high specific surface area, superior biocompatibility, enriched oxygen-containing groups, and stability, scientists have been able to load genes/drugs via chemical conjugation or physisorption methods. Recently, researchers have developed polyethyleneimine-modified GO for gene delivery.

Graphene derivatives, e.g., reduced GO (rGO) and doped graphene, have been utilized for the detection of biomolecules, such as amino acids, dopamine, thrombin, and oligonucleotide. GO-based biosensors are also used to identify DNA. Additionally, scientists have used GO for bioimaging of cellular uptake, of polyethylene glycol-modified GO, during drug delivery.

Scientists have performed various nanotoxicological studies to determine the risk factors associated with graphene applications and its derivatives. They determined the toxicological profile of graphene nanosheets in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial models.

These studies have shown that graphene damages bacterial cell membranes via direct contact with the sharp edges of the nanowalls. However, studies have shown that graphene has low toxicity on the luminal macrophages and epithelial cells.

Some of the key determining factors of graphene toxicity to human red blood cells and skin fibroblasts are particulate state, size of the particle, and oxygen content of graphene. Additionally, the functional groups present on the surface of GO nanostructures play a vital role in inducing cytotoxicity.

Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in human lung fibroblasts associated with GO are due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis. One of the potential concerns of application GO is that it can induce DNA cleavage, which could lead to many adverse effects on humans.

Unlike CNTs, minimal research is available regarding the safety of graphene. This is partly due to the initial difficulties associated with enhancing its production. Another reason for the limited knowledge could be that graphene is still in its early developmental stage.

The introduction of carbon nanomaterials in human bodies could result in its accumulation in tissues or elimination via excretion. In the case of accumulation, it could affect the proper functioning of human organs. Additionally, it is important to determine if an individual exposed to graphene induces an immune response or causes inflammation.

One of the major concerns of nanoscopic platelets of graphene-based materials is their thin, lightweight, and tough structure, which causes a detrimental effect when inhaled. Scientists stated that the flakes of carbon might be transported deep inside lung tissues, which might either induce chronic inflammatory responses or inhibit normal cellular functions.

Scientists stated that as the skin is the first interface between the body and the surrounding, it is most exposed to graphene materials. The impact of graphene and GO on the skin depends on their size and physicochemical properties.

Several studies have indicated that exposure to a high concentration of graphene and its derivative for a prolonged period causes membrane damage, indicating low toxicity to skin cells.

Several studies have shown that toxicity related to GO can be reduced by altering the surface functional groups and masking the oxygenated functional groups with a biocompatible polymer. For instance, an in vitro study revealed that compared to GO, polyvinylpyrrolidone-modified GO exhibits lower immunogenicity.

Some of the measures undertaken to minimize health risks for workers who are directly associated with the development of graphene or graphene-based technologies include utilizing stable and individual graphene nanosheets that can be easily dispersed in water to reduce aggregation problems in the body.

Other recommendations include using graphene sheets that are small enough to be engulfed by immune cells and readily removed and biodegradable forms of graphene to prevent damages caused by chronic accumulation in tissues.

Foley, T. (2021) Graphene Flagship. [Online] Available at: https://graphene-flagship.eu/graphene/news/understanding-the-health-and-safety-of-graphene/

Arvidsson, R., et al. (2018) "Just Carbon": Ideas About Graphene Risks by Graphene Researchers and Innovation Advisors.Nanoethics,12(3), pp. 199210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018-0324-y

Awodele, M.K. et al. (2018) Graphene and its Health Effect Review Article. International Journal of Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine, 3 (2), pp. 1-5.

Seabra, B.A. et al. (2014) Nanotoxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide. Chemical Research in Toxicology.2014, 27, 2. pp.159168. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx400385x

Bussy, C. et al. (2013) Safety considerations for graphene: lessons learnt from carbon nanotubes. Accounts of Chemical Research, 46(3), pp. 692701. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ar300199e

Bradley, D. (2012) Is graphene safe? Materials Today, 15 (6), pp. 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70101-3

Shen, H. et al. (2012) Biomedical applications of graphene.Theranostics,2(3), pp. 283294. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.3642

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Follow this link:
Understanding the Health Risks of Graphene - AZoNano

Read More...

Prevalence and predictors of SARS-CoV-2 | IDR – Dove Medical Press

May 20th, 2022 1:56 am

Introduction

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (initially named 2019-nCov) was discovered to be responsible for outbreaks of an unusual series of viral pneumonia of unknown origin in Wuhan. It was later named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), because of the structural similarities with SARS-CoV, that caused the outbreak of SARS in 2003.13

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped, single-stranded ribonucleic acid beta coronavirus. This highly contagious pathogen is transmitted by respiratory droplets and aerosols, direct contact of mucous membranes and probably the fecaloral route.46

This viral infection primarily targets the respiratory system, and is usually presented by fever, cough, sore throat or shortness of breath as initial symptoms.7,8 Although some patients may be asymptomatic and they are likely to spread the infection, a group of them may develop symptoms and their condition may worsen.912

Pulmonary symptoms are the most frequently reported symptoms, however recent studies proved the presence of neurological and gastrointestinal manifestations among the SARS-CoV-2 infected patients.13,14

Although real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is considered the first tool to make a definitive diagnosis of COVID-19, the high false negative results, low sensitivity and limited supplies might delay accurate diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) has been reported as an important tool to identify and investigate suspected patients with COVID-19 at an early stage.15

Many patients with mild or severe SARS-CoV-2 do not make a full recovery and have a wide range of persistent symptoms for weeks or months after infection, often of a neurological, cognitive or psychiatric nature.16

A standardized case definition for post-COVID-19 syndrome is still being developed. The Centre for Disease Control (CDC) has formulated post-COVID-19 conditions to describe health issues that persist more than four weeks after being infected with COVID-19. The World Health Organization has also developed a clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 syndrome to include individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection usually 3 months from the onset of infection with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis.17

The pathophysiological basis is not well understood, however immune reaction, inflammation, persistent viremia, relapse or reinfection are all suggested etiologies.16,18,19

To date physicians and researchers are still learning about the symptoms and signs of this novel virus. Many survivors may experience many morbidities and multiple manifestations requiring long-term monitoring. Hence the aim of this study was to determine the persistence of any symptoms or signs after clearance of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19 infection during the first wave.

During the period between August 2020 and October 2020, a multicenter cross-sectional survey was done.

A list was made of all patients who had been discharged from quarantine hospitals after recovery from COVID-19 during the period from March to May 2020. Our patients fulfilled the criteria of the World Health Organization for discontinuation of quarantine which include that the patient should have no fever for 3 consecutive days, the test results should be negative for SARS-CoV-2, with improvement of other symptoms. A stratified sampling technique was used to select a random sample from this list.

The sample size was calculated by OpenEpi, Version 3, and open-source calculator. It was found to be 384 with CI 95% and error probability of 5%.

Data on specific symptoms, which may be correlated with COVID-19, were obtained using a standardized questionnaire which was adapted and administered by the researchers to the patients by visit or phone call.

The study tool included two sections, the first one was for demographic data (age, sex, governorate, and smoking), pre-existing comorbidities, medication used, date of initial diagnosis (first positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2) and date of negative PCR for SARS-CoV-2. In addition there was a section on health-care management details (home isolation, hospital or ICU admission) including length of hospital stay, medication used, oxygen therapy and if used ventilation (invasive or non-invasive).

Patients were questioned about the presence or absence of symptoms during the acute phase of COVID-19 and if each symptom persisted at the time of the visit or phone call. Patients were asked about: sense of fever, skin rash, pruritus, bone aches, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, rhinorrhea, chest pain/tightness, palpitation, syncopal attacks, fatigue, muscle pain, joint pain/stiffness, anosmia, ageusia, headache, dizziness, numbness, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, abdominal pain, constipation, dyspepsia, dysphagia, jaundice, weight loss/gain, hematemesis, melena, visual changes, hearing changes, vertigo, low/high mood, poor sleep, agitation, self-harm, delusions, hallucinations, thought disorders, suicidal tendency, dysuria, hematuria, vaginal bleeding, abortion, puffy eyes, loss of libido, and erectile dysfunction. Date of appearance and date of resolution were reported. An open text field was added at the end of the symptoms collection sheet to add any other symptoms or possible complications of COVID-19 infection. Patients or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.

The sample size was calculated using OpenEpi, Version 3, for proportion studies. Population size (number of reported COVID-19 patients in Egypt at the time of the study) (N): ~338,000, Hypothesized % frequency of post-COVID-19 symptoms in the population (p): 50% 5, confidence interval of 95%, and design effect (for cluster surveys-DEFF): 1.

The sample size was 384 with CI 95% and error probability of 5%. However, we included 538 cases.

To achieve proper social distancing and to decrease risk of possible transmission of COVID-19, respondents were interviewed either by a visit in a non-COVID designated area or through a phone call. Paper use for documentation was also avoided. We explained to the respondents the objectives of the study and sent them an information sheet containing all details of the study to read before the interview. A written consent to participate in the study was obtained before administration of the questionnaires. This study was approved by the Damietta Faculty of Medicine Al Azhar University Ethical committee IRB 00012367.

There was no direct patient involvement in this study.

Descriptive data analysis was performed for categorical variables including frequencies and proportions. As appropriate, inferential statistics were performed between groups with the Chi square test or KruskalWallis test. Differences within groups were evaluated with the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to predict the persistence of symptoms at follow-up. P value level of significance was set at 0.05. Data entry and analysis were completed using MS Excel 2017 and data analysed using SPSS Version 25.

We started with 561 subjects, 23 were excluded either due to difficult communication or refusal of the patient to participate in the study. So, our study included 538 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections. The study flow chart is shown in Figure 1. 54.1% were male. The mean age was 41.17 (SD 14.84, range 587 years) and 18.6% were smokers. The most reported co-morbid conditions were diabetes mellitus in 17.1%, hypertension in 19.5% (5.2% were receiving ARBs and 7.6% were receiving ACEIs), COPD in 5.4%, chronic kidney disease in 1.1%, ischemic heart disease in 4.5% and immunosuppressive state in 0.4% (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Characters of Studied Patients

Figure 1 Study flow chart.

Almost half of the studied patients (51.3%) were admitted to hospital with an average hospital stay of 13.58 (SD 6.40, range 437) days, 6.5% were admitted to ICU with an average ICU stay of 9.66 (SD 5.85, range 230) days. Symptoms were mild in 61.3%, moderate in 31% and severe in 7.6% of patients (Table 2).

Table 2 Severity and Hospital Stay Characterization of Studied Patients

Frequencies of medication used in treatment of the studied patients are presented in Figure 2. Most commonly reported symptoms persisting after viral cure were fatigue, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, loss of smell, anorexia, loss of taste, diarrhea, headache, low mood, abdominal pain, nausea, muscle pain, chest pain, joint pain and poor sleep (Figure 3). Although reported in the active stage of the disease, the following symptoms were not persistent after viral clearance: abortion (reported initially in 0.6%), puffy eyes (reported initially in 0.4%), hallucination (reported initially in 0.8%), thought disorders (reported initially in 0.2%), suicidal tendency (reported initially in 0.4%), self-harm (reported initially in 0.2%), facial droop (reported initially in 0.2%), photophobia (reported initially in 1%), dysarthria (reported initially in 0.6%), vomiting (reported initially in 12.3%), wheeze (reported initially in 2%), hemoptysis (reported initially in 0.4%) and rhinorrhea (reported initially in 5.8%). The symptoms reported initially and that persisted after viral cure are presented in Table 3. Factors associated with symptoms persistence were hospital admission, disease severity, treatment with hydroxychloroquine, steroid, anticoagulant, azithromycin, multivitamins and receiving oxygen therapy; the rest of the other factors were not associated with symptom persistence in univariate analysis (Table 4). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and multivitamins were the only factors associated with symptom persistence (Table 5).

Table 3 Symptoms Persisting After Clearance of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Table 4 Factors Associated with Persistent Symptoms Persistence

Table 5 Multivariate Analysis for Predictors of Post-Covid-19 Persisting Symptoms

Figure 2 Frequencies of medication used in treatment of the studied patients.

Figure 3 Post Covid-19 acute and persistent symptoms.

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, Egypt reported 337,487 confirmed cases and 228,583 were discharged after clearance of the virus.8 Interestingly, some of those patients presented to the outpatient clinics complaining of vague symptoms resembling the acute phase symptoms that triggered the concepts of incomplete recovery or persistence of COVID-19 infection. This is an Egyptian study for assessment of the post-discharge persistent symptoms after recovery from COVID-19 and possible long-term impact of COVID19 infection.

In our study, 84.6% of patients who recovered from COVID-19 have one or more persistent symptoms. Fatigue, cough, sense of fever and dyspnea were among the most common reported symptoms followed by sore throat, anorexia, loss of taste and smell, diarrhea, headache, and low mood.

The median duration to symptom resolution among those with persistent symptoms ranged from 1 to 83 days from the negative PCR test date, with the longest duration reported for vertigo (median = 82 days; 23147 days) and numbness (median = 77 days; 1126 days).

A telephone-based report from the USA investigating 274 symptomatic COVID-19 adult outpatients, found 23 weeks are needed by about 30% of contributors to get back to their usual state. Cough, fatigue and shortness of breath at the time of testing were the most persistent symptoms. The median duration for disappearance of symptoms ranged from 48 days from the test date. The longest duration was reported for anosmia (median = 8 days; IQR = 510.5 days) and loss of taste (median = 8 days; IQR = 410 days).20

Also, a single-center study from Rome included 143 hospitalized post-COVID-19 recovered patients who were assessed 60 days following infection. Surprisingly, only about 13% were completely free of any persistent symptoms. Meanwhile, 32% had at least one or two symptoms and 55% showed three or more persistent manifestations.21

A Facebook-based survey in the Netherlands and Belgium that included a large scale of COVID-19 patients either hospitalized or non-hospitalized, confirmed or suspected, showed that only 0.7% of the respondents were symptom-free 79 days after the infection. Fatigue and dyspnea were the most common symptoms, in both hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients.22

Interestingly, 58.5% of our patients with mild COVID-19 infection have one or more persistent symptoms which is consistent with anecdotal evidence, which stated that patients with the so-called mild COVID-19 may still complain about persistent symptoms, even weeks after the onset of symptoms.23,24

In agreement with our results, Davido et al.25 reported that most of the outpatients who experienced mild symptoms attributable to COVID-19 would further present with persistent symptoms, such as sense of fever, severe fatigue, chest tightness, palpitations, muscle aches, anxiety and headaches shortly after convalescence.

In our study, fatigue persisted in about 59.1% of participants for a median of 31 days. This was in accordance with data reported from France,25 Italy21 and UK.26 Fatigue was explained by dysautonomia that was reported in the ALBA COVID registry (2.5%),27, also endocrine disturbance with hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis attenuation, reactive mood disorder such as depression or anxiety could be contributing factors for pathophysiology of post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.28,29

Similar results also reported from a single-center study in the UK that investigated 100 post-discharge COVID-19 patients showed that fatigue was the most commonly described symptom in both ICU and ward groups (72% and 60.3%, respectively).26

Contrary to our findings, a Chinese prospective cohort study of 131 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan found that by 34 weeks post-discharge 86% of patients were asymptomatic, only 1.5% had shortness of breath and 0% had fatigue. This could be attributed to the lower case severity of these patients with few co-morbidities. Moreover, underreporting could be expected due to the nature of this study focusing on evaluation of ongoing transmissibility, and participants were asked about the quarantine situation.30

Post viral infection fatigue syndrome was first described in EpsteinBarr virus (EBV) infection.31 In the previously experienced epidemics of SARS, H1N1 and Ebola, many patients with persistent fatigue were serious enough to be diagnosed as Myalgia Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). More than 50% of patients surviving SARS experienced fatigue during their recovery: 64% reported fatigue at 3 months, 54% at 6 months and 60% at 12 months.32

Fatigue and breathlessness are not uncommonly reported as persistent symptoms following community-acquired pneumonia and ICU admission, but the duration varies substantially.33,34 Hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia in several studies were found to experience breathlessness and fatigue that usually resolved in 1014 days from symptom onset.35

Among the persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms detected in our work were low mood (20.6%), poor sleep (12.6%) and poor concentration (4.8%). Our results are consistent with Garrigues et al.36 who found that after a mean of 110.9 days, the most frequently reported persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms were loss of memory, concentration and sleep disorders (34%, 28% and 30.8%, respectively). These results are in agreement with Srivastava et al. who reported that recovered COVID-19 patients suffered from a significant degree of depression and high rate of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).37

Classic neurological disorder such as loss of taste, smell, headache, numbness and vertigo were present and persist in 22.9%, 21.7%, 21.4, 19% and 12%, respectively, these results were in accordance with results from a systematic review conducted in 2022 by Whittaker et al.38

These neurological disorders are attributed to endothelial injury and microangiopathy, which was described in brain biopsies of severe form of COVID-19.39 Also, severity of condition and PTSD could be co-factor in neuropsychiatric persistence symptoms,40 in children it seems similar to the late Kawasaki syndrome that was reported after COVID-19.41

In the present study, a sense of fever was detected in 250 (46.5%) patients and persisted for 20.68 30.66 days (12 patients confirmed the presence of fever by measuring temperature) in contrast with the progressive decline observed in cases of influenza.

Ng et al. studied 142 patients with COVID-19 for persistence of fever. They observed that 12.7% had fever lasting more than 7 days (prolonged fever), and 9.9% had recurrence of fever lasting less than a day after defervescence after day 7 of illness (saddleback fever) that may be correlated to decreased levels of interleukin 1 alpha and increased levels of interferon gamma-induced protein 10 in their patients with prolonged fever.42

Moreover, it was found that COVID-19 patients may complain of low-grade fever during convalescence which was attributed to the incomplete recovery of their immunity at that stage which elucidates the recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 positivity that was noticed in many patients during convalescence.43

Among the non-respiratory manifestations that are of special concern in COVID-19 patients, were the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) symptoms. They may be solitary, they may become progressive during the course of the disease and they may occur early, which is completely different from the other coronaviruses.44

The most prevalent GI symptom in our study was anorexia which was detected in 131 patients (24.3%) as a persistent symptom after cure for 197 days. Moreover, 131 patients (24.3%) had diarrhea that continued after cure for 1100 days. Diarrhea can be explained by the change in the intestinal permeability that is caused by the virus, leading to dysfunction of the enterocytes.45 That was in agreement with the Garrigues et al.36 study in which diarrhea persisted in 29 patients (24.2%).

In our study, abdominal pain was reported in 106 patients (18.7%) and 97 patients (18%) had persistent pain after cure for 1104 days. In contrast, Kecler-Pietrzyk et al. reported anorexia, diarrhea and nausea among the common persistent symptoms, but abdominal pain was rare, particularly as the initial presenting complaint.46

Neither age nor presence of co-morbid conditions were associated with persistent symptoms in our study, whereas Tenforde et al.20 found that those with older age and chronic co-morbidities were associated with much prolonged disease.

In our work, it was found that hospital admission and the use of some drugs such as chloroquine, steroids, anticoagulants, azithromycin, multivitamins and oxygen therapy during acute COVID-19 phase, and severity of the disease were associated with persistence of symptoms. However, results of multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of chloroquine, azithromycin and multivitamins only were significantly associated with persistence of symptoms (Odds ratio 8.03, 8.89 and 10.12, respectively). This is also in accordance with results of other studies on post-viral/infectious syndromes47,48 and those with critically ill ICU (non-COVID) patients, who still suffer a variety of symptoms months after their hospitalization, what is also named post-ICU syndrome.49,50

Limitations of our study include the lack of information on symptom history before acute COVID-19 illness and being based on a single phone call interview that created an obstacle of contacting certain participants, such as those with dementia and/or learning difficulties. Also, the telephone-based survey is subjected to incomplete recall errors or recall bias. So, we recommend future interviews at monthly intervals for better characterization of symptoms progression of postCOVID19 patients. Furthermore, patients who had a negative swab result and clinical-radiological criteria suggestive of COVID-19 were not included in this study. Our study had the advantage of obtaining detailed symptom severity inquiry. In addition, this is a multi-centre study with a relatively large number of patients.

The post-COVID-19 symptoms should be carefully addressed and evaluated carefully. Those patients could suddenly seek care for what might be considered a chronic fatigue syndrome. Persistent symptomatic post-COVID-19 patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team including a psychologist, a pulmonologist, a neurologist and a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation in specialized post-COVID-19 clinics to optimize our health-care services.

The study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines of the 1975 Helsinki Declaration. This study was approved by the Damietta Faculty of Medicine Al Azhar University Ethical committee IRB 00012367. All participants were adults and all of them provided written informed consent before collection of samples. To achieve proper social distancing and to decrease risk of possible transmission of COVID-19, respondents were interviewed either by a visit in a non-COVID designated area or through a phone call. Paper use for documentation was also avoided. We explained to the respondents the objectives of the study and sent them an information sheet containing all details of the study to read before the interview. A written consent to participate in the study was obtained before administration of the questionnaires.

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

1. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270273. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7

2. Abd Ellah NH, Gad SF, Muhammad K, Batiha EG, Hetta HF. Nanomedicine as a promising approach for diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19. Nanomedicine. 2020;15(21):20852102. doi:10.2217/nnm-2020-0247

3. Abid SA, Muneer AA, Al-Kadmy IM, et al. Biosensors as a future diagnostic approach for COVID-19. Life Sci. 2021;273:119117. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119117

4. Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, Liu Y, Li X, Shan HJG. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):18311833. e1833. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055

5. Mahmood Z, Alrefai H, Hetta HF, et al. Investigating virological, immunological, and pathological avenues to identify potential targets for developing covid-19 treatment and prevention strategies. Vaccines. 2020;8(3):443. doi:10.3390/vaccines8030443

6. Moubarak M, Kasozi KI, Hetta HF, et al. The rise of SARS-CoV-2 variants and the role of convalescent plasma therapy for management of infections. Life. 2021;11(8):734. doi:10.3390/life11080734

7. Almaghaslah D, Kandasamy G, Almanasef M, Vasudevan R, Chandramohan S. Review on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: its outbreak and current status. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74(11):e13637. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13637

8. Abdellatif AA, Tawfeek HM, Abdelfattah A, Batiha GE-S, Hetta HF. Recent updates in COVID-19 with emphasis on inhalation therapeutics: nanostructured and targeting systems. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;63:102435. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102435

9. Dai W, Chen X, Xu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang: an imperceptible source of infection. Can Respir J. 2020;2020:2045341. doi:10.1155/2020/2045341

10. Magdy Beshbishy A, Hetta HF, Hussein DE, et al. Factors associated with increased morbidity and mortality of obese and overweight COVID-19 patients. Biology. 2020;9(9):280. doi:10.3390/biology9090280

11. Beshbishy AM, Oti VB, Hussein DE, et al. Factors behind the higher COVID-19 risk in diabetes: a critical review. Front Public Health. 2021;9:591982.

12. Koneru G, Batiha GE-S, Algammal AM, et al. BCG vaccine-induced trained immunity and COVID-19: protective or bystander? Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:1169. doi:10.2147/IDR.S300162

13. Iltaf S Sr., Fatima M, Salman S Sr., Salam JU, Abbas S. Frequency of neurological presentations of coronavirus disease in patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital during the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9846. doi:10.7759/cureus.9846

14. Laszkowska M, Faye AS, Kim J, et al. Disease course and outcomes of COVID-19 among hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal manifestations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;19(7):14021409.

15. Alsharif W, Qurashi A. Effectiveness of COVID-19 diagnosis and management tools: a review. Radiography. 2021;27(2):682687. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2020.09.010

16. Islam MF, Cotler J, Jason LA. Post-viral fatigue and COVID-19: lessons from past epidemics. Fatigue. 2020;8(2):6169.

17. World Health Organization. A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus, 6 October 2021; 2021.

18. Dar HA, Waheed Y, Najmi MH, et al. Multiepitope subunit vaccine design against COVID-19 based on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2: an in silico analysis. J Immunol Res. 2020;2020:8893483. doi:10.1155/2020/8893483

19. Collaborative G, Collaborative C. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study. Br J Surg. 2021;108(9):10561063.

20. Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems networkUnited States, MarchJune 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(30):993. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6930e1

21. Carf A, Bernabei R, Landi F; Group ftGAC-P-ACS. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(6):603605. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12603

22. Gortz YMJ, Van Herck M, Delbressine JM, et al. Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome? ERJ Open Res. 2020;6(4):0054202020. doi:10.1183/23120541.00542-2020

23. Garner P. Covid-19 and fatiguea game of snakes and ladders; 2020.

24. Callard F, Perego E. How and why patients made Long Covid. Soc Sci Med. 2021;268:113426. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426

25. Davido B, Seang S, Tubiana R, de Truchis P. Post-COVID-19 chronic symptoms: a postinfectious entity? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(11):14481449. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.028

26. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol. 2021;93(2):10131022.

27. Romero-Snchez CM, Daz-Maroto I, Fernndez-Daz E, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the ALBACOVID registry. Neurology. 2020;95(8):e1060e1070. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009937

28. Papadopoulos AS, Cleare A. Hypothalamicpituitaryadrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome. Nature Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(1):2232.

29. Sandler CX, Wyller VB, Moss-Morris R, et al. Long COVID and post-infective fatigue syndrome: a review. Paper presented at: Open forum infectious diseases; 2021.

30. Wang X, Xu H, Jiang H, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of discharged coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a prospective cohort study. QJM. 2020;113(9):657665. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa178

31. Hotchin NA, Read R, Smith DG, Crawford DH. Active Epstein-Barr virus infection in post-viral fatigue syndrome. J Infect. 1989;18(2):143150.

32. Tansey CM, Louie M, Loeb M, et al. One-year outcomes and health care utilization in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(12):13121320. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.12.1312

33. Petrie JG, Cheng C, Malosh RE, et al. Illness severity and work productivity loss among working adults with medically attended acute respiratory illnesses: US influenza vaccine effectiveness network 20122013. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):448455. doi:10.1093/cid/civ952

34. Wootton DG, Dickinson L, Pertinez H, et al. A longitudinal modelling study estimates acute symptoms of community acquired pneumonia recover to baseline by 10days. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(6):1602170. doi:10.1183/13993003.02170-2016

35. Wyrwich KW, Yu H, Sato R, Powers JH. Observational longitudinal study of symptom burden and time for recovery from community-acquired pneumonia reported by older adults surveyed nationwide using the CAP Burden of Illness Questionnaire. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:215223. doi:10.2147/PROM.S85779

36. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;81(6):e4e6. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.029

37. Srivastava A, Bala R, Devi TP, Anal L. Psychological trauma and depression in recovered COVID-19 patients: a telecommunication based observational study. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2021. doi:10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0381

38. Whittaker A, Anson M, Harky A. Neurological manifestations of COVID19: a systematic review and current update. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;142(1):1422. doi:10.1111/ane.13266

View post:
Prevalence and predictors of SARS-CoV-2 | IDR - Dove Medical Press

Read More...

Page 131«..1020..130131132133..140150..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick