header logo image


Page 16«..10..15161718..»

Archive for the ‘Stem Cell Negative’ Category

Merus (NASDAQ:MRUS) Stock Rating Lowered by Zacks Investment Research – Polson News

Sunday, November 3rd, 2019

Zacks Investment Research cut shares of Merus (NASDAQ:MRUS) from a hold rating to a sell rating in a research report report published on Friday morning, Zacks.com reports.

According to Zacks, Merus B.V. is a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company developing bispecific antibody therapeutics, referred to as Biclonics. The companys bispecific antibody candidate, MCLA-128, is being evaluated in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial as a potential treatment for HER2-expressing solid tumors; MCLA-117, is being developed as a potential treatment for acute myeloid leukemia and MCLA-158, which is designed to bind to cancer stem cells and is being developed as a potential treatment for colorectal cancer and other solid tumors. Merus B.V. is headquartered in Utrecht, the Netherlands.

MRUS has been the subject of a number of other reports. ValuEngine upgraded Merus from a sell rating to a hold rating in a research note on Thursday. BidaskClub upgraded Merus from a hold rating to a buy rating in a research note on Thursday, September 26th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have assigned a hold rating and six have issued a buy rating to the companys stock. The company presently has an average rating of Buy and an average price target of $23.43.

Shares of MRUS traded up $0.33 during trading hours on Friday, hitting $15.99. The stock had a trading volume of 102,700 shares, compared to its average volume of 91,051. The companys fifty day simple moving average is $17.16 and its 200 day simple moving average is $15.58. The firm has a market cap of $335.80 million, a P/E ratio of -8.69 and a beta of 0.24. Merus has a 12-month low of $11.00 and a 12-month high of $20.95.

Merus (NASDAQ:MRUS) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Monday, August 19th. The biotechnology company reported ($0.57) EPS for the quarter, missing the Zacks consensus estimate of ($0.54) by ($0.03). The firm had revenue of $6.27 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $8.62 million. Merus had a negative return on equity of 41.68% and a negative net margin of 104.10%. As a group, sell-side analysts expect that Merus will post -1.74 EPS for the current year.

A number of large investors have recently bought and sold shares of the stock. Artal Group S.A. grew its stake in Merus by 16.7% in the second quarter. Artal Group S.A. now owns 350,000 shares of the biotechnology companys stock worth $5,128,000 after purchasing an additional 50,000 shares in the last quarter. Morgan Stanley lifted its holdings in Merus by 3.1% in the second quarter. Morgan Stanley now owns 92,776 shares of the biotechnology companys stock worth $1,359,000 after acquiring an additional 2,788 shares during the last quarter. Athanor Capital LP bought a new position in Merus in the second quarter worth about $334,000. Finally, JPMorgan Chase & Co. lifted its holdings in Merus by 63.5% in the second quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. now owns 8,722 shares of the biotechnology companys stock worth $123,000 after acquiring an additional 3,389 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 52.00% of the companys stock.

Merus Company Profile

Merus N.V., a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company, engages in developing bispecific antibody therapeutics. Its bispecific antibody candidate pipeline includes MCLA-128, which is in a Phase II clinical trial for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer; and Phase I/II study for treating gastric, ovarian, endometrial, and non-small cell lung cancers.

Read More: Do You Need a Fiduciary?

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Merus (MRUS)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

See the original post:
Merus (NASDAQ:MRUS) Stock Rating Lowered by Zacks Investment Research - Polson News

Read More...

Who are Some of the Most Influential Gen Xers in the Biotech Industry? – BioSpace

Thursday, October 24th, 2019

Its no secret that Generation X is known for so many things, both positive and negative. Some call members of this group, born between the years of 1961 and 1981, slackers who lack motivation. However, this certainly isnt true for many Generation Xers, including those who have shaped and influenced the biotechnology industry we know today. The five scientists on this list collectively made many exciting strides in the field, notably because they had the technological skills to embrace and utilize advances in the realm of computer programming. Strategically combining technology with biology, which is literally the meaning of biotech, allowed the five intellectuals described here to advance healthcare, one small step at a time.

Sebastian Seung, Princeton University

Sebastian Seung, currently a professor at Princeton University's Neuroscience Institute at the Jeff Bezos Center in Neural Dynamics, works to connect neurons in the brain using computer-based technology. He came up with the Connectome Theory, which is best described as being similar to the Human Genome Project, only for the brain. By determining how the brains neurons function and connect with one another, strides may be made in treating diseases like Alzheimers. Since these neural connections seem to change frequently, computer programs are needed to help create the map. On top of his work in the fields of physics and neuroscience, Seung also gives TED talks and authors books.

Hugh Herr, BiOM, Inc.

Not only is Hugh Herr a well-known biotech leader, but hes also an avid mountain climber. In fact, the latter greatly influenced his work in the field. Back in 1982, he was involved in an incident on New Hampshires Mount Washington that tragically led to the amputation of both of his legs below the knee. But Herr refused to let that stop him from doing what he loved, so he founded BiOM, Inc in conjunction with MITs Media Lab, which makes advanced prosthetics for athletes and individuals who want to keep living their lives, despite their physical disabilities. Among other awards, his work has garnered him the 2016 Princess of Asturias Award for Technical & Scientific Research.

Jennifer Doudna, University of California Berkeley

Serving as the University of California Berkleys Li Ka Shing Chancellor Chair Professor in both the Chemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology Departments, Jennifer Doudna specializes in studying a form of genome editing known as CRISPR. In addition, Doudna determined that the Hepatitis C virus synthesizes viral proteins in a unique way, allowing the development of new vaccines for the disease. Her tireless work in the biotech field has led to several awards, ranging from the American Cancer Societys Medal of Honor to Rockefeller Universitys Pearl Meister Greengard Prize.

Karl Deisseroth, Stanford University

Controlling neurons with optogenetics, which uses light to change how those neurons fire in the brain, is the main breakthrough of Karl Deisseroth, currently the D. H. Chen Professor of Bioengineering and of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. Deisseroth has received a number of awards for his research breakthroughs, including the Fresenius Research Prize in 2017, the 2016 Harvey Prize, and the 2019 Warren Alpert Foundation Prize. Hes also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine.

Nina Tandon, Epibone

Swooping in at the tail end of Generation X, Nina Tandon is the co-founder of Epibone, a professor of Electrical Engineering at Cooper Union, and a fellow in the Lab for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering at Columbia. Her background includes degrees in BioMedical Engineering and Electrical Engineering. At Epibone, Tandon and her colleagues create bone tissue out of the stem cells. The tissue then is used for bone grafts in patients, greatly reducing the chances of rejection. Among other accolades, she has been named a Global Thinker by Foreign Policy Magazine, as well as TED Senior Fellow.

Its no secret these five creative innovators choose discovery over complacency. Together and individually, each of these Gen-Xers made inspirational and memorable discoveries that shaped the life-changing biotech industry we appreciate today.

Follow this link:
Who are Some of the Most Influential Gen Xers in the Biotech Industry? - BioSpace

Read More...

Latest Report on Stem Cell Therapy Market Future Scope Including Top key Players Anterogen Co., Ltd., RTI SurgicalInc. – The World Industry News

Thursday, October 24th, 2019

Recent research and the current scenario as well as future market potential ofGlobal Stem Cell Therapy Market Set For Rapid Growth, To Reach Around USD 4759.27 Million By 2024.The global Stem Cell Therapy Market report provides significant information about Stem Cell Therapy Market by fragmenting the market into different segments. GlobalStem Cell Therapy MarketReport concentrates on the strong analysis of the present state ofStem Cell Therapy Marketwhich will help the readers to develop innovative strategies that will act as a catalyst for the overall growth of their industry.(Sample Copy Here)This research report segments theStem Cell Therapy Marketaccording to Type, Application and regions.It highlights the information about the industries and market, technologies, and abilities over the trends and the developments of the industries. After deep research and analysis by the experts, they also disclosed the data about the strong contenders contributing in the market growth and expansion and challenging one another in terms of demand, supply, production, value estimation, revenue, and sales.

Request For Free Sample ofStem Cell Therapy MarketReport:www.zionmarketresearch.com/sample/stem-cell-therapy-market

Along with the elaborated information about the key contenders, the globalStem Cell Therapy Marketreport efficiently provides information by segmenting the market on the basis of the type services and products offerings, form of the product, applications of the final products, technology on which the product is based, and others. The report is also bifurcated the market on the basis of regions to analyze the growth pattern of the market in different geographical areas.

Major Key Players are :

The report majorly enlightens the key growth and limiting factors which majorly targets at the center of the market affecting the growth and its development in either positive or negative extent. The report also specifies the impact of regulations and policies implemented by the administration over the current growth and upcoming opportunities that may lead to the market development escalation. The report further reveals the forecast data of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market regionally [Latin America, North America, Asia Pacific, Middle & East Africa, and Europe] regarding the upcoming growth pattern for a specific time period on the basis of past information of the market data as well as current modifications in technology, products, and trends. The global Stem Cell Therapy Market report offers a superior vision of the global market, which will help clients to manage the business precisely with better growth and expansion compared to its contenders in the market.

Get Free Brochure ofStem Cell Therapy MarketReport:www.zionmarketresearch.com/requestbrochure/stem-cell-therapy-market

The Stem Cell Therapy Market report includes the leading advancements and technological up-gradation that engages the user to inhabit with fine business selections, define their future-based priority growth plans, and to implement the necessary actions. The global Stem Cell Therapy Market report also offers a detailed summary of key players and their manufacturing procedure with statistical data and profound analysis of the products, contribution, and revenue.

Abstract

The report covers the conjecture and investigation for the Stem Cell Therapy Market on a worldwide and provincial level.

The report incorporates the positive and the negative factors that are impacting the development of the market.

All the sections have been assessed dependent on the present and the future patterns.

The report incorporates the definite organization profiles of the noticeable market players.

Browse Press Release@www.zionmarketresearch.com/news/stem-cell-therapy-market

he global Stem Cell Therapy Market report conveys the information regarding the prcised escalation or decline in market growth due to several key factors. The analysts, using various analytical methodologies such as probability, SWOT analysis, among others to generate the precise forecast belonging to the growth rate and upcoming opportunities in the market growth at the global level. The global Stem Cell Therapy Market report represents the complete information of the market in an eye-catching and easily understandable way with examples, figures, graphs, and flowcharts.

This report focuses on price, sales, revenue and growth rate of each type, as well as the types and each type price of key manufacturers, through interviewing key manufacturers. Second on basis of segments by manufacturers, this report focuses on the sales, price of each type, average price ofStem Cell Therapy Market, revenue and market share, for key manufacturers.

Following 15 Chapters represents the Stem Cell Therapy Market globally:

Chapter 1,enlist the goal of global Stem Cell Therapy Market covering the market introduction, product image, market summary, development scope,Stem Cell Therapy Market presence;

Chapter 2,studies the key global Stem Cell Therapy Market competitors, their sales volume, market profits and price of Stem Cell Therapy Market in 2016 and 2025;

Chapter 3,shows the competitive landscape view of global Stem Cell Therapy Market on the basis of dominant market players and their share in the market growth in 2016 and 2025;

Chapter 4,conducts the region-wise study of the global Stem Cell Therapy Marketbased on the sales ratio in each region, and market share from 2016 to 2025;

Chapter 5,6,7,8 and 9demonstrates the key countries present in these regions which have revenue share in Stem Cell Therapy Market;

Chapter 10 and 11describes the market based on Stem Cell Therapy Market product category, wide range of applications, growth based on market trend, type and application 2016 to 2025;

Chapter 12shows the global Stem Cell Therapy Market plans during the forecast period from 2016 to 2025 separated by regions, type, and product application.

Chapter 13, 14, 15mentions the global Stem Cell Therapy Market sales channels, market vendors, dealers, market information and study conclusions, appendix and data sources.

The classification of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market is done based on the product type, segments, and end-users. The report provides an analysis of each segment together with the prediction of their development in the upcoming period. Additionally, the latest research report studies various segments of the global Stem Cell Therapy Market in the anticipated period.

Also, Research Report Examines:

Lastly, with a team of vivacious industry professionals, we offer our clients with high-value market research that, in turn, would aid them to decipher new market avenues together with new strategies to take hold of the market share.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

Browse for more Research Reports:fnfresearch.com

As one of the lead news writers at the world industry news, Hirens specialization lies in the science, technology, Health & business domains. His passion for the latest developments in cloud technology, connected devices, nanotechnology, and virtual reality, among others, shines through in the most recent industry coverage he provides. Hirens take on the impact of digital technologies across the technology, health and business domains gives his writing a fresh and modern outlook.

See original here:
Latest Report on Stem Cell Therapy Market Future Scope Including Top key Players Anterogen Co., Ltd., RTI SurgicalInc. - The World Industry News

Read More...

Multiple Myeloma Experts, Patients, Advocates and Caregivers Team Up to Hike Through Patagonia – Business Wire

Thursday, October 24th, 2019

CRANBURY, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As a part of a fundraising effort by Moving Mountains for Multiple Myeloma (MM4MM), 13 individuals will traverse Patagonias awe-inspiring and incredible landscape from Nov. 9-19. MM4MM is a joint initiative between the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF), CURE Media Group and Celgene. The upcoming climb includes survivors, caregivers, family members, myeloma doctors and team members from the organizing partners.

Since MM4MM began with its first climb in 2016, the program has raised over $2.7 million. All the funds raised go directly to the MMRF to accelerate new treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma.

As a patient founded organization, the MMRF stands together with those who are battling multiple myeloma patients, families, physicians, researchers, and our pharmaceutical partners. This team represents a microcosm of that myeloma community and demonstrates that together, we can collaborate with ever increasing momentum towards a cure, said Paul Giusti, CEO of the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation. We are thrilled to enter the fifth year of this inspiring program and to have Celgene join us in this effort to raise awareness and critical funds to continue our mission.

The MM4MM team will include four patients living with multiple myeloma:

We are so honored to be a part of yet another hike with the MMRF and Celgene, said Mike Hennessy Jr., president and CEO of MJH Life Sciences, parent company of CURE magazine. This initiative organized by Moving Mountains for Multiple Myeloma not only raises awareness and research funding for multiple myeloma but has brought together the myeloma community to take action and fight for a cure for myeloma patients.

The team will embark on a five-day trek of a lifetime through Patagonia and take on the rewarding and beautiful landscape that includes glaciers, deep valleys and challenging peaks. During this trek, the team will travel through El Chaltn and acclimatize while they experience the mighty range of peaks dominated by Monte Fitz Roy, an 11,020-foot tower with a sheer face of more than 6,000 feet. Next, the team will reach Lago San Martin, where they will traverse the terrain in daily treks, exploring a 10-mile peninsula, climbing to a condor rookery and reaching remote Andean lakes.

Celgene, Cure and the MMRF share an unwavering commitment to improving the lives of patients with multiple myeloma and we are very proud to continue our role in the Moving Mountains for Multiple Myeloma initiative, said Chad Saward, senior director, patient advocacy at Celgene Corp. We are amazed and inspired by all who are participating in this unique awareness program.

To learn more about MM4MM and to donate to multiple myeloma research, click here.

About Moving Mountains for Multiple Myeloma

Moving Mountains for Multiple Myeloma (MM4MM) is a collaboration between CURE Media Group and the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) to raise awareness and funds for myeloma research. This year, Celgene Corporation and GSK join the effort as sponsors. In addition to Patagonia, the program also led hikes up Mt. Washington and through Iceland in 2019. To date, MM4MM has raised over $2.7 million for myeloma research and included 51 patients with multiple myeloma on 7 climbs. Funds raised go directly to research, supporting the MMRF mission. For more information, visit https://www.themmrf.org/events/.

About Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of the plasma cell. It is the second most common blood cancer. An estimated 32,110 adults (18,130 men and 13,980 women) in the United States will be diagnosed with MM in 2019 and an estimated 12,960 people are predicted to die from the disease. The five-year survival rate for MM is approximately 50.7%, versus 31% in 1999.

About the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation

A pioneer in precision medicine, the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) seeks to find a cure for all multiple myeloma patients by relentlessly pursuing innovations that accelerate the development of precision treatments for cancer. Founded in 1998 by Kathy Giusti, a multiple myeloma patient, and her twin sister Karen Andrews as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, the MMRF has created the business model around cancerfrom data to analytics to the clinic. The MMRF identifies barriers and then finds the solutions to overcome them, bringing in the best partners and aligning incentives in the industry to drive better outcomes for patients. Since its inception, the organization has collected thousands of samples and tissues, opened nearly 100 trials, helped bring 10 FDA-approved therapies to market, and built CoMMpass, the single largest genomic dataset for any cancer. Today, the MMRF is building on its legacy in genomics and is expanding into immune-oncology, as the combination of these two fields will be critical to making precision medicine possible for all patients. The MMRF has raised nearly $500 million and directs nearly 90% of the total funds to research and related programs. To learn more, visit http://www.themmrf.org.

About CURE Media Group

CURE Media Group is the leading resource for cancer updates, research and education. It combines a full suite of media products, including its industry-leading website, CUREtoday.com; innovative video programs, such as CURE Connections; a series of widely attended live events; and CURE magazine, which reaches over 1 million readers, as well as the dynamic website for oncology nurses, OncNursingNews.com, and its companion publication, Oncology Nursing News. CURE Media Group is a brand of MJH Life Sciences, the largest privately held, independent, full-service medical media company in the U.S. dedicated to delivering trusted health care news across multiple channels.

Follow this link:
Multiple Myeloma Experts, Patients, Advocates and Caregivers Team Up to Hike Through Patagonia - Business Wire

Read More...

‘He is not ready to go right now’: John Elway continues to play long game with Drew Lock – The Athletic

Thursday, October 24th, 2019

John Elway knew this would happen.

After trading up to draft Drew Lock in the second round of the draft, the questions of when his training as the future would start were asked almost immediately.

Lock, the quarterback Elway had eyed throughout the pre-draft process, arrived in Denver after a four-year career in Missouris spread offense. His transition to the Broncos offense an updated version of Mike Shanahans system would take time, from the tiniest details such as his study habits and footwork to the bigger concepts of the offense.

It was paramount, Elway stressed then, that the Broncos remain patient with his development and not rush it.

We believe he has a ton of talent, but we also believe he has a lot left to work on, he said in April. When we look at it, were hoping Drew is the future. But Joe (Flacco) is the starter, is going to be the starter and hes going to...

See the rest here:
'He is not ready to go right now': John Elway continues to play long game with Drew Lock - The Athletic

Read More...

CRISPR Therapeutics: At The Top Of My Shopping List – Seeking Alpha

Thursday, October 24th, 2019

CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) has been on my watchlist for a couple of years but the stars never aligned for me to pull the trigger on a buy. Due to some recent updates, I am moving CRSP up to the top of my year-end shopping list and will be stalking an entry point in the coming weeks or months.

I intend to discuss the primary reasons why I have waited for an entry, as well as what has tempted me to start a position. In addition, I discuss some of my leading downside risks associated with this ticker and how I plan to manage my potential position over the next year.

(Image Source: CRISPR)

CRISPR Therapeutics is a leader in gene editing, specifically in the advancement of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-CRISPR-associated protein 9 "CRISPR-Cas9". CRISPR-Cas9 is a gene therapy, however, it is a revolutionary technology that intends to edit the deleterious gene. This is executed by altering explicit genomic sequences that should correct the bad gene or to alleviate the symptoms of the disease. Essentially, CRISPR is attempting to create curative gene therapies for both rare and common diseases.

CRISPR's programs can be divided up into ex vivo, where the company edits cells outside of the body and in vivo, the CRISPR-Cas9-based therapeutic targeted directly into the cells inside the body. CRISPR's leading pipeline programs take aim at hemoglobin related genetic disorders such as transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia "TDT" and severe sickle cell disease "SCD". Both conditions desperately need a curative therapy because the current standard-of-care is insufficient. In addition to gene editing, the company has several gene-edited allogeneic cell therapy programs, including a few CAR-T candidates for hematological and solid tumor cancers. Furthermore, the company is taking gene-editing into regenerative medicines to address Type 1 diabetes, as well as taking on DMD and few other indications (Figure 1).

Figure 1: CRISPR Pipeline (Source: CRSP)

CRISPR-Cas9 for gene editing was co-invented by Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier, who is one of CRISPR's founding members. The company now has the rights to Dr. Charpentier's CRISPR-Cas9 technologies, as well as some supplementary technology from other in-licensing efforts. What is more, CRISPR has a strong list of partnerships that will maximize CRISPR-Cas9's ability both clinically and commercially.

CRISPR has always been on my radar and I have admittedly traded the ticker a few times. However, I have been very cautious about investing in the company for a few reasons. One of which, is the fact that it is named after the technology associated with the gene therapies. Although there are other types of gene therapies, CRISPR appears to be the "brand" or term the market associates with all things gene therapy. Consequently, any bad news, setback, or regulatory failure in gene therapy has had a negative impact on the ticker. Essentially, CRISPR becomes a punching bag for anything that goes wrong in the industry. CRSP experienced strong selling pressure following Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT) receiving a CRL for their DMD gene therapy. As a result, the stock fell from just under $50 a share to ~$43 per share in a few days. Of course, the rest of the industry experienced some selling pressure, but it appears CRSP gets the worst of it. As a result, I have been reluctant to commit to CRSP knowing that it will always be a target for shorts.

Another reason why I have passed on CRSP was due to its early pipeline. The company's pipeline is still mostly pre-clinical, so I would have been investing in science and not a mature product portfolio. Although I am happy to invest in an early-stage biotech/pharma company, I wanted to see if the FDA was willing to allow gene-editing therapies to be put into humans considering the controversy associated with the technology.

My last reason for holding off an investment was the valuation. The company's market valuation appeared to have a premium price on it. Admittedly, the company's high-priced valuation was due to its name and the hype around the gene therapy and not from a fundamental perspective. Although I am sold on the technology, I wasn't going to commit to a long-term investment to an early-stage company that is years away from a pivotal trial, regardless of the technology was from one of the co-founders of the CRISPR-Cas9.

In general, I knew the company was too early in the regulatory process and I expected the ticker to be toyed around with by traders and analysts. Therefore, I wanted to save myself from an unwanted rollercoaster ride of an investment.

The company is now a clinical-stage gene-editing company, which eliminates one of the reasons why I decided to hold off on starting a long-term investment. CRISPR's lead product candidate, CTX001, is ex-vivo CRISPR therapy that is being developed in collaboration with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX) for TDT or severe SCD. CTX001 is essentially a process that requires the company to engineer a patient's hematopoietic stem cells to increase the levels of fetal hemoglobin "HbF" in red blood cells.

Figure 2: CTX001 SCD (Source: CRSP)

The increase of HbF has the potential to assuage the need for transfusions for TDT and SCD patients.

Figure 3: CTX001 HbF (Source: CRSP)

CRISPR Therapeutics is enrolling in both Phase I/II studies of CTX001 in TDT and severe SCD. The company expects preliminary safety and efficacy data before the year-end. So far, the first TDT patient treated with CTX001 remains "transfusion independent, greater than four months following engraftment."

Now that CXT001 is in the clinic, we can expect several catalysts to come from these programs. Again, I did believe in the technology but the market needs to see that the pre-clinical data will transfer into humans. If the data is promising, we can expect an increase in attention from the market and from Street analysts. The company is expecting to report preliminary results for CTX001 by year-end, so I wouldn't mind having some skin-in-the-game ahead of that readout.

Another reason for a buy is the expanding use of the company's CRISPR-Cas9 technology. In addition to gene editing, the CRISPR-Cas9 has the potential to generate next-gen CAR-T therapies that may be superior to the contemporary autologous CAR-T (Figure 4).

Figure 4: CAR-T Highlights (Source: CRSP)

The company has programs including CTX110, a healthy donor-derived gene-edited allogeneic CAR-T therapy targeting CD19. In pre-clinical mouse studies, the company detected that CTX110 extended the survival in CD19-positive xenograft tumors. In addition to CTX110, the company has CTX120 that is targeting BCMA in multiple myeloma and CTX130 that could target both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.

Figure 3: CTX110 & CTX120 (Source: CRSP)

In preclinical studies both CTX120 and CTX130 were able to record "complete tumor elimination" in their respective targets.

Figure 4: CTX130 (Source: CRSP)

In addition to cell-therapies, CRISPR is using their ex vivo gene-editing in regenerative medicine by using stem cells to restore or exchange damaged or malfunctioning tissue. Their leading regenerative program is diabetes with their partner, ViaCyte Inc (Figure 5).

Figure 5: In Diabetes (Source: CRSP)

CRISPR has other in vivo disease targets that impact the liver, lung and muscle. These will use the company's lipid nanoparticle-based delivery vehicles "LNPs" and AAV vectors to help deliver the genetic material.

Figure 6: Neuro & Liver (Source: CRSP)

Other notable programs include Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia "GSDIa", DMD and cystic fibrosis.

Admittedly, I have always seen CRISPR as a pure gene-editing company, however, they have a diverse pipeline and the technology to expand it into numerous other indications and areas of therapy. I expect the company will expand on their research efforts, which should increase the pending value of the company and add some catalysts to the calendar.

The company intends to advance their CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics both autonomously and in strategic partnerships (Figure 7). The company has closed three major partnerships with Vertex, Casebia/Bayer (OTCPK:BAYRY) and ViaCyte. These partnerships not only provide CRISPR with some support, but they confirm that other reputable companies see CRISPR as a leader in this field.

Figure 7: CRSP Partnerships (Source: CRSP)

As the company expands its pipeline, I anticipate an increase in the number of strategic partnerships and deals. In fact, the company recently announced a partnership with KSQ Therapeutics to in-license IP to advance their cell therapy programs.

My final reason for stalking an entry is the improved risk/reward scenario. The stock appears to have lost some momentum and has had a relatively flat 2019. The stock has recently experienced a strong pull-back, yet, the company has made substantial progress in both the pipeline and strategic collaborations.

Figure 8: CRSP Daily (Source: Trendspider)

This recent pull-back has cut the market cap down to ~$2B which I believe is fair considering the long-term outlook for the company.

Figure 9: CRSP Valuation (Source: Seeking Alpha)

Looking at the CRSP's annual revenue estimates (Figure 10), we can see the Street expects the company to have relatively flat revenues for the next couple of years and will start to experience strong revenue growth in the second half of the next decade. This rapid growth is expected to drop the forward price-to-sales ratio below 1x at some point in 2027. The sector's average price-to-sales is about 5x, so that would equal ~$13B market cap in 2027.

Figure 10: CRSP Annual Revenue Estimates (Source: Seeking Alpha)

I understand this is years away, but I expect these estimates to only improve as the company continues to add pipeline programs and other strategic partnerships. Indeed, I could wait another year or two to further reduce my risk and cost for time. However, I don't want to be left out of this ticker if the company starts reporting curative results in multiple programs. What would happen if the company demonstrates the potential to cure Type 1 diabetes? Do you think it will be trading at a $2B market cap? What about if they cure cystic fibrosis? Sickle Cell? Eliminate renal cancer with an autologous CAR-T therapy? I believe the company would be undervalued at $2B even if they only cured one of these indications. Assuming the company has at least one winner in their current pipeline, I have to say the current risk/reward is enticing enough for me to start a speculative position.

I believe the biggest threat to CRISPR comes from the impressive competition from other gene therapy companies and institutions. These include companies that are working on CRISPR-Cas9 technology such as Intellia Therapeutics (NTLA) and most notably Editas Medicine (EDIT). Other gene-editing companies such as bluebird bio (BLUE), Sangamo Therapeutics (SGMO), Cellectis (CLLS), Precision BioSciences (DTIL), and Allogene Therapeutics (ALLO) use other gene-editing platforms. There is a multitude of gene therapy companies that I didn't mention, but I think you get my point. Some of these companies are not in the same league as CRISPR, however, I believe CRISPR's biggest threat is something that is currently in a theoretical stage or perhaps hasn't been thought of yet. As gene therapy products begin to hit the market and start dethroning current standard-of-care therapies, I expect big pharma to start devoting a larger percentage of their R&D to gene therapies. As a result, more universities and institutions will start pioneering new CRISPR tech and perhaps another level of gene editing. If they are successful, they will most likely dethrone CRISPR-Cas9 as cutting-edge technology.

CRISPR is a developmental biotech company, so of course, the financials will be an issue until the company has a product on the market. At the end of Q2, the company had $427.9M in the bank. The company's R&D expenses were $39.5M for Q2, which led to a net loss of $53.7M. Usually, I would consider $428M to be a strong cash position for pre-revenue biotech, but I don't think we are seeing peak cash-burn. The company has several programs that haven't even hit the clinic yet, so we can expect that cash position to melt rapidly in the coming years. In fact, the company recently secured a $200M at-the-market sale of common stock, so we should expect the company to tap the market when they need to. Even then, investors need to accept the strong possibility the company will execute secondary offerings in the future.

CRISPR Therapeutics has evolved over the past couple of years and so has my view of a potential investment. The company's premium name brought a premium price, which generated a substantial amount of attention from traders who have created detached or arbitrary valuations for the ticker. Now, the company has moved into the clinic and will be generating data that could reveal curative level results for dreadful diseases and conditions. If CRISPR is able to gain regulatory approval, the product could replace the current standard-of-care for the indication and eventually dominate as patients demand a cure, rather than dealing with a lifetime of medications or procedures.

Due to this potential, I am moving CRSP up to the top of my shopping list as we close out 2019. I expect many of the speculative biotech names to experience end-of-the-year tax selling, so I am going to keep a close eye on the charts to see if I can get a nice discount to establish a large position. In the meantime, I rely on the chart's technicals to find an entry. Returning to figure 8, we can see the stock has returned to its previous trading range after a month of selling pressure. If the share price is able to hold this area over the next couple of weeks, I will look to click the buy button on a low volume day. If the stock breaks below $35, I will most likely hold off on a buy until the end of the year. Once I have established a position, I will look to add to my position following data readouts with a goal to have a full-sized position by the end of 2021.

Disclosure: I am/we are long SRPT. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Additional disclosure: I am also long BLUE.

Excerpt from:
CRISPR Therapeutics: At The Top Of My Shopping List - Seeking Alpha

Read More...

The Prognostic Importance of EVI1 Expression – Cancer Network

Friday, October 18th, 2019

In AML, the role of ecotropic virus integration site-1 (EVI1) expression is debated. To date, results of studies have been mixed with only some studies demonstrating EVI1 expression related to poorer survival. In a meta-analysis published in the Annals of Hematology, researchers set out to uncover the predictive capability of this marker.

As a malignant disorder in hematology usually with a poor prognosis, AML needs an accurate prediction of prognosis to indicate protocoling the appropriate therapy regimens for patients hoping for survival improvement, wrote authors, led by Xia Wu, Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province. Molecular markers increasingly play an utmost significant role in the diagnosis and risk stratification of AML.

In the current meta-analysis, Wu et al. mined 11 studies for 4767 AML patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk (ICR), according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN), or European leukemia network (ELN) guidance. The findings indicated that EVI1 expression negatively impacted OS (HR = 1.73, 95%CI 1.432.11) and event=free survival or EFS (HR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.051.31). Furthermore, EVI1 was a negative predictor of prognosis in patients with normal cytogenetics (NC) and younger patients (< 60 years).

Importantly, the investigators noted that due to location, altered EVI1 most often accompanies 3q26 rearrangements. However, it remains to be elucidated whether increased EVI1 expression is related to AML outcomes in those without 3q mutations. On a related note, higher levels of EVI1 may affect AML subgroups differently, which, according to the authors, is of utmost significance for clinical physicians.

In other findings, EVI1H expression was rarely found with NPM1, FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutations. Wu et al point to these mutations and mutations as avenues of further research.EVI1 is a transcription factor on chromosome 3. It was first discovered two decades ago in murine models. It has stem cell specific expression patterns and mediates growth of hematopoietic stem cells, and plays a role in AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and CML.

The investigators suggested that the findings of the current study could assist clinicians with risk stratification and treatment decisionsespecially because most patients are NC.

EVI1, which also goes by MECOM, encodes a 145 kDa-unique zinc finger that attaches with DNA. This transcription factor is hypothesized to interfere with granulocyte and erythroid cell differentiation, as well as promotion of megakaryocyte breakdown, to aid with the differentiation and proliferation of hematopoetic stem cells.Several drug targets for EVI1 have been suggested such those involved in leukemogenesis and stem cell maintenance. Examples include the transcription factor Pre-B Cell leukemia Homeobox 1 (PBX1) and Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN), which is a tumor suppressor gene. However, none of these targets have proven related to EVI1-deregulated AML.

Per the authors the current study had several limitations. First, most studies in the meta-analysis were observational and not randomized-controlled trials. Second, the sample contained cases of therapy-related AML and secondary AML, which have a worse prognosis and could thus confound results. Third, limited OS data precluded the ability to study AML patients without 3q alterations. Fourth, the studies were highly heterogeneous in a clinical sense.

Reference

Wu X et al. Prognostic significance of the EVI1 gene expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis. Annals of Hematology. 2019 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03774-z.

Read this article:
The Prognostic Importance of EVI1 Expression - Cancer Network

Read More...

Sernova Confirms Enduring Levels of Fasting C-Peptide in Bloodstream of First Patient in its Phase I/II Clinical Trial for Type-1 Diabetes – BioSpace

Friday, October 18th, 2019

Findings further validate Cell Pouch and therapeutic cell performance in Type-1 diabetes

LONDON, ONTARIO October 16, 2019 Sernova Corp. (TSX-V:SVA)(OTCQB:SEOVF)(FSE:PSH), a clinical- stage regenerative medicine company, is pleased to announce the detection of enduring levels of C-peptide (measured up to 30 days and ongoing), a biomarker of transplanted beta cell insulin production, in the bloodstream of a fasting patient in its ongoing Phase I/II Cell Pouch(TM) US clinical study of type-1 diabetes. The detection of fasting C-peptide in the bloodstream of our first patient, in addition to Sernovas recent announcement of glucose-stimulated C-peptide and other early efficacy indicators, demonstrate a normalizing response of the Cell Pouch therapeutic cells to the bodys varied need for insulin production. This is an important step forward and evidence of ongoing islet engraftment within the Cell Pouch.

Along with the preliminary safety and early indicators of efficacy, I am excited that we are observing C-peptide levels in the patients bloodstream after recent transplant, not only following stimulation with a meal but also when the patient is fasting. These findings represent progress in clinical outcomes and evidence of enduring islet survival and function within Sernovas Cell Pouch, said Dr. Piotr Witkowski, Director of Pancreatic, and Islet Transplant Program at the University of Chicago and study principal investigator. We look forward to reporting ongoing results in additional patients as the trial progresses.

The entry criteria of Sernovas clinical study require patients to be C-peptide negative upon enrolment. C- peptide measured in the bloodstream is a biomarker of insulin and is widely used as a measure of insulin production by islet cells. C-peptide is typically measured following overnight fasting (fasting C-peptide) and during a glucose tolerance test (glucose-stimulated C-peptide). Together these measures provide an index of the patients ability to control blood glucose through their production of insulin.

With the goal of improved blood glucose control and stabilization of fluctuating blood sugar levels commonly experienced in people with type-1 diabetes, a normalizing response can also decrease the likelihood of life threatening hypoglycemic unaware events, a key efficacy measure in the Sernova trial.

Sernovas clinical trial is continuing active recruitment and enrollment of study participants and further results will continue to be reported as the study progresses.

ABOUT SERNOVAS CLINICAL TRIAL

Sernova is conducting a Phase I/II non-randomized, unblinded, single arm, company-sponsored trial, to assess the safety and tolerability of islet transplantation into the companys patented Cell Pouch in participants with diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness. The secondary objective is to assess efficacy through a series of defined measures. Importantly, patients enrolled in Sernovas clinical trial are incapable of producing C- peptide prior to implantation of Sernovas Cell Pouch and therapeutic cells.

Eligible subjects are implanted with Cell Pouches. Following development of vascularized tissue chambers within the Cell Pouch, subjects are then stabilized on immunosuppression and a dose of purified islets, under strict release criteria, transplanted into the Cell Pouch.

A sentinel pouch is removed for an early assessment of the islet transplant. Subjects are followed for additional safety and efficacy measures for approximately six months. At this point, a decision is made with regards to the transplant of a second islet dose with subsequent safety and efficacy follow up. Patients will be then further followed for one year to assess longer-term safety and efficacy.

For more information on this clinical trial, please visit http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03513939. For more information on enrollment and recruitment details please visit http://www.pwitkowski.org/sernova.

ABOUT SERNOVAS CELL POUCH

The Cell Pouch is a novel, proprietary, scalable, implantable macro-encapsulation device designed for the long- term survival and function of therapeutic cells. The device is designed to incorporate with tissue, forming highly vascularized tissue chambers for the transplantation and function of therapeutic cells which then release proteins and hormones as required to treat disease. The device along with therapeutic cells has been shown to provide long-term safety and efficacy in small and large animal models of diabetes and has been proven to provide a biologically compatible environment for insulin-producing cells in humans.

ABOUT SERNOVA CORP.

Sernova Corp is developing regenerative medicine therapeutic technologies using a medical device and immune protected therapeutic cells (i.e., human donor cells, corrected human cells and stem-cell derived cells) to improve the treatment and quality of life of people with chronic metabolic diseases such as insulin- dependent diabetes, blood disorders including hemophilia, and other diseases treated through replacement of proteins or hormones missing or in short supply within the body. For more information, please visit http://www.sernova.com

Read more here:
Sernova Confirms Enduring Levels of Fasting C-Peptide in Bloodstream of First Patient in its Phase I/II Clinical Trial for Type-1 Diabetes - BioSpace

Read More...

InvestmentPitch Media Video Discusses Sernova Corp’s Further Validation of Cell Pouch and Therapeutic Cell Performance in Type-1 Diabetes – Video…

Friday, October 18th, 2019

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - October 17, 2019) - Sernova Corp. (TSXV: SVA) (OTCQB: SEOVF) (FSE: PSH), a clinical stage regenerative medicine company, has reported findings that further validate Cell Pouch and therapeutic cell performance in Type-1 diabetes. The Cell Pouch is a novel implantable device, that is transplanted with therapeutic cells such as insulin producing islets.

InvestmentPitch Media has produced a "video" which describes this news. If this link is not enabled, please visit http://www.InvestmentPitch.com and enter "Sernova" in the search box.

Cannot view this video? Visit:http://www.investmentpitch.com/

The device is designed to incorporate with tissue, forming highly vascularized tissue chambers for the transplantation and function of therapeutic cells which then release proteins and hormones as required to treat disease. The Cell Pouch, along with therapeutic cells, has been shown to provide long-term safety and efficacy in small and large animal models of diabetes and has been proven to provide a biologically compatible environment for insulin-producing cells in humans.

Sernova reported the detection of enduring levels of C-peptide, measured up to 30 days and ongoing, in the bloodstream of a fasting patient in its ongoing Phase I/II Cell Pouch US clinical study of type-1 diabetes. This is an important step forward and evidence of ongoing islet engraftment within the Cell Pouch, as patients enrolled in Sernova's clinical trial have been incapable of producing C-peptide, prior to implantation of Sernova's Cell Pouch and therapeutic cells.

Dr. Piotr Witkowski, Director of Pancreatic, and Islet Transplant Program at the University of Chicago and study principal investigator, stated: "Along with the preliminary safety and early indicators of efficacy, I am excited that we are observing C-peptide levels in the patient's bloodstream after recent transplant, not only following stimulation with a meal but also when the patient is fasting. These findings represent progress in clinical outcomes and evidence of enduring islet survival and function within Sernova's Cell Pouch. We look forward to reporting ongoing results in additional patients as the trial progresses."

The entry criteria of Sernova's clinical study require patients to be C-peptide negative upon enrolment. C-peptide, a biomarker of insulin and widely used as a measure of insulin production by islet cells, is typically measured following overnight fasting and during a glucose tolerance test. Together these measures provide an index of the patient's ability to control blood glucose through their production of insulin.

With the goal of improved blood glucose control and stabilization of fluctuating blood sugar levels commonly experienced in people with type-1 diabetes, a normalizing response can also decrease the likelihood of life threatening hypoglycemic unaware events, a key efficacy measure in the Sernova trial.

Sernova's clinical trial is continuing active recruitment and enrollment of study participants and further results will continue to be reported as the study progresses.

For more information on this clinical trial, please visit http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03513939. For more information on enrollment and recruitment details please visit http://www.pwitkowski.org/sernova.

Sernova Corp is developing regenerative medicine therapeutic technologies using a medical device and immune protected therapeutic cells, such as human donor cells, corrected human cells and stem-cell derived cells, to improve the treatment and quality of life of people with chronic metabolic diseases. These diseases include insulin-dependent diabetes, blood disorders including hemophilia, and other diseases treated through replacement of proteins or hormones missing or in short supply within the body.

For more information, please visit the company's website http://www.sernova.com, contact Dominic Gray, Corporate Communications, at 519-858-5126 or email dominic.gray@sernova.com.

About InvestmentPitch Media

InvestmentPitch Media leverages the power of video, which together with its extensive distribution, positions a company's story ahead of the 1,000's of companies seeking awareness and funding from the financial community. The company specializes in producing short videos based on significant news, research reports and other content of interest to its following of retail, institutional and accredited investors.

Story continues

Original post:
InvestmentPitch Media Video Discusses Sernova Corp's Further Validation of Cell Pouch and Therapeutic Cell Performance in Type-1 Diabetes - Video...

Read More...

Magenta Therapeutics Appoints Jan Pinkas as Senior Vice President, Head of Translational Sciences and Announces Transition of Chief Scientific Officer…

Friday, October 18th, 2019

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Magenta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: MGTA), a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel medicines to bring the curative power of stem cell transplant to more patients, today announced the appointment of Jan Pinkas, Ph.D., as Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences. The Company also announced that Mike Cooke, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, will leave Magenta to pursue other opportunities.

We have made tremendous progress at Magenta, with two clinical programs in multiple trials and with our targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for patient preparation advancing toward the clinic, said Jason Gardner, D. Phil., Chief Executive Officer and President, Magenta. Jan is an expert drug developer who will provide critical translational input and help us accelerate the advancement of our programs as we work to make cures possible for more patients.

Magenta is uniquely positioned as the only company taking a comprehensive approach to unlocking the power of stem cell transplant medicine, said Dr. Pinkas. I am very excited to be part of the team that is building and expanding upon this foundational and innovative work to bring potentially transformative therapies to patients.

Dr. Pinkas is a seasoned scientist with deep expertise in leading drug development programs, specifically ADCs. Prior to joining Magenta, he was Head of Translational Research & Development at Immunogen, where he led nonclinical and translational research and development-related activities for all programs in discovery through late-stage clinical development. Dr. Pinkas earned his undergraduate degree in biology from Johns Hopkins University and his doctorate in Molecular and Cellular Biology from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

As Magenta has evolved into a clinical-stage company with a robust pipeline of preclinical assets, Mike has made tremendous contributions. He has built a world-class research organization and advanced our pipeline. Mike and I agreed that now, with a well-established Magenta research platform that is generating strong conditioning ADCs, validated targets, and discovery biology, it is the right time for Mike to explore other opportunities. We wish him well in his new adventure and will always be grateful for his scientific contributions, added Dr. Gardner.

I am very proud of Magentas rapid progress since our launch three years ago, and I am particularly proud of the cutting-edge scientific work that has come from our platform, said Dr. Cooke. I am confident that the scientific groundwork we have laid will help ensure that Magenta achieves its vision to transform the lives of many patients.

About Magenta TherapeuticsHeadquartered in Cambridge, Mass., Magenta Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing novel medicines for patients with autoimmune diseases, blood cancers and genetic diseases. By creating a platform focused on critical areas of unmet need, Magenta Therapeutics is pioneering an integrated approach to allow more patients to receive one-time, curative therapies by making the process more effective, safer and easier.

Forward-Looking StatementThis press release may contain forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. The use of words such as may, will, could, should, expects, intends, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, projects, seeks, endeavor, potential, continue or the negative of such words or other similar expressions can be used to identify forward-looking statements. The express or implied forward-looking statements included in this press release are only predictions and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, without limitation risks set forth under the caption Risk Factors in Magentas Registration Statement on Form S-1, as updated by Magentas most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this press release may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although Magenta believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, except as required by law, neither Magenta nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements included in this press release. Any forward-looking statement included in this press release speaks only as of the date on which it was made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

See the article here:
Magenta Therapeutics Appoints Jan Pinkas as Senior Vice President, Head of Translational Sciences and Announces Transition of Chief Scientific Officer...

Read More...

Sphingosine 1-phosphate: Lipid signaling in pathology and therapy – Science Magazine

Friday, October 18th, 2019

Mediating systemic health

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is an important circulating lipid mediator that is derived from the metabolism of cell membranes. Its diverse homeostatic roles, particularly in immunology and vascular biology, can go awry in numerous diseases, including multiple sclerosis, cardiovascular diseases, and fibrosis. The centrality of S1P signaling has led to the development of several drugs, including two approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis. In a Review, Cartier and Hla discuss the current understanding of how one mediator can carry out so many signaling roles in different tissues, how these become dysregulated in disease, and efforts in drug development to target S1P signaling.

Science, this issue p. eaar5551

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a product of membrane sphingolipid metabolism, is secreted and acts through G proteincoupled S1P receptors (S1PRs) in vertebrates. S1PR isoforms mediate complex cellular actions either alone or in combination in most organ systems. This stable lysolipid circulates as a complex with protein chaperones that not only enables aqueous solubility but also helps facilitate specific modes of receptor signaling. However, differential concentration gradients of S1P are normally present in various compartments and are perturbed under disease conditions. The abundance of circulatory S1P and the high expression of S1PRs in exposed cellsthat is, vascular and hematopoietic cellsposes a key question of how this signaling axis is regulated. This question is of clinical relevance because the first S1PR-targeted drug, fingolimod, has been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis since 2010. Recent findings from basic research as well as insights gleaned from clinical and translational studies have enriched our understanding of how this simple lysolipid evolved as a complex regulator of multiple physiological systems and, when dysregulated, contributes to numerous diseases.

Extracellular spatial gradients of S1P, demonstrated by using S1P reporters, are tightly regulated and control fundamental processes such as hematopoietic cell trafficking, immune cell fate, and vascular integrity. The gradients are formed through location-specific function of metabolic enzymes, S1P transporters, and chaperones. Such physiological S1P gradients are altered in diseases, thus contributing to conditions such as inflammation, autoimmunity, and vascular dysfunction. S1P complexed to chaperone proteinsfor example, high-density lipoproteinbound apolipoprotein Mmediate distinct modes of receptor activation, resulting in biased receptor signaling and specific biological outcomes. S1PRs are also regulated tightly through endocytic mechanisms and receptor modulators that enhance or inhibit signal strength and duration. Various signaling mechanisms of this simple lysolipid mediator has helped reveal its multiple actions in the immune system, which include adaptive immune cell localization in various compartments (egress versus retention), fate switching, survival, and activation that influences both cell-mediated and humoral immunity. In the cardiovascular system, high expression of multiple S1PR isoforms in various cell types regulate development, homeostasis, and physiology. Current S1PR-targeted drugs that aim to tame autoimmunity exhibit considerable cardiovascular-adverse events. In the central nervous system (CNS), widespread application of S1PR-targeted drugs in autoimmune neuroinflammatory diseases has stimulated research that revealed the broad but poorly understood effects of S1P signaling in neurodevelopment, the neurovascular unit, neurons, and glia. Furthermore, in addition to the involvement of pathological S1P signaling in acute ischemic conditions of various organs, chronic dysregulated S1P signaling has been implicated in fibrotic diseases of lung, heart, liver, and kidney.

Considerable challenges remain to fully harness the new knowledge in S1P pathobiology to translational utility in clinical medicine. Approaches that mimic S1P chaperones, S1P neutralizing agents, modulation of transporters, biased agonists and antagonists of S1PR isotypes, and sphingolipid metabolic enzyme modulators provide viable pathways to therapy. Focusing on the immune system, such approaches may widen the autoimmunity therapeutic landscape and provide new directions in cancer and chronic inflammatory diseases. For cardiovascular diseases, ischemic conditions as well as chronic heart failure are likely candidates for future translational efforts. Although further work is needed, S1P-targeted approaches may also be useful in regenerative therapies for the aging and diseased myocardium. The CNS-targeted efforts may cross into neurodegenerative diseases, given the success with S1PR-targeted drugs in reducing brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Other potential applications include approaches in pain management and neurodevelopmental disorders. Such strategies, although challenging, are greatly helped by findings from basic research on S1P pathobiology as well as pharmacological and clinical insights derived from the application of S1P-targeted therapeutics.

Extracellular S1P gradients created by transporters, chaperones (ApoM+HDL), and metabolic enzymes (LPP3) interact with S1PRs on the cell surface. Receptor activity, transmitted by means of G proteins, is regulated by multiple mechanisms, including -arrestin coupling, endocytosis, and receptor modulators. The resultant cellular changes influence multiple organ systems in physiology and disease.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a metabolic product of cell membrane sphingolipids, is bound to extracellular chaperones, is enriched in circulatory fluids, and binds to G proteincoupled S1P receptors (S1PRs) to regulate embryonic development, postnatal organ function, and disease. S1PRs regulate essential processes such as adaptive immune cell trafficking, vascular development, and homeostasis. Moreover, S1PR signaling is a driver of multiple diseases. The past decade has witnessed an exponential growth in this field, in part because of multidisciplinary research focused on this lipid mediator and the application of S1PR-targeted drugs in clinical medicine. This has revealed fundamental principles of lysophospholipid mediator signaling that not only clarify the complex and wide ranging actions of S1P but also guide the development of therapeutics and translational directions in immunological, cardiovascular, neurological, inflammatory, and fibrotic diseases.

Read this article:
Sphingosine 1-phosphate: Lipid signaling in pathology and therapy - Science Magazine

Read More...

Rocket Pharmaceuticals Announces Upcoming Presentations at the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Annual Congress – Business Wire

Friday, October 18th, 2019

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: RCKT) (Rocket), a leading U.S.-based multi-platform gene therapy company, today announces data presentations at the upcoming European Society of Cell and Gene Therapy (ESGCT) 27th Annual Congress taking place October 2225, 2019, in Barcelona, Spain. Presentations at this years meeting include four oral presentations and one poster presentation related to Rockets lentiviral pipeline programs for Fanconi Anemia (FA), Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD), Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD), and Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO).

Details for Rockets oral and poster presentations are as follows:Title: Towards Haematopoietic Stem Cell-Targeted Gene Therapy of Infantile Malignant OsteopetrosisSession Title: Skeletal Muscle & Bone Gene TherapySession Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2019Session Time: 5:30 PM 7:30 PM CESTRoom: 116-117

Title: Gene Therapy for Patients with Fanconi AnaemiaSession Title: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials IISession Date: Thursday, October 24, 2019Session Time: 8:30 AM - 10:30 AM CESTRoom: 113-117

Title: First Steps of a Lentiviral Gene Therapy Clinical Trial for Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencySession Title: Blood DiseasesSession Date: Thursday, October 24, 2019Session Time: 2:45 PM - 4:45 PM CESTRoom: 211

Title: Broad Applicability of NHEJ-Mediated Gene Editing to Correct Mutations in a Variety of Fanconi Anaemia GenesSession Title: New Approaches in Gene EditingSession Date: Friday, October 25, 2019Session Time: 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM CESTRoom: 113-115

Title: Stable Transduction of Long-Term HSCs Under Optimized GMP-Conditions for the Gene Therapy of LAD-I PatientsSession Title: Poster Session IISession Date: Thursday, October 24, 2019Session Time: 1:15 PM - 2:45 PM CESTPoster Number: P228

Full results from the ESGCT presentations will be available online at the conclusion of the presentation: https://www.rocketpharma.com/esgct-presentations/

About Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCKT) (Rocket) is an emerging, clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing first-in-class gene therapy treatment options for rare, devastating diseases. Rockets multi-platform development approach applies the well-established lentiviral vector (LVV) and adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy platforms. Rocket's first two clinical programs using LVV-based gene therapy are for the treatment of Fanconi Anemia (FA), a difficult to treat genetic disease that leads to bone marrow failure and potentially cancer, and Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I), a severe pediatric genetic disorder that causes recurrent and life-threatening infections which are frequently fatal. Rockets first clinical program using AAV-based gene therapy is for Danon disease, a devastating, pediatric heart failure condition. Rockets pre-clinical pipeline programs for bone marrow-derived disorders are for Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) and Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO). For more information about Rocket, please visit http://www.rocketpharma.com.

Rocket Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsVarious statements in this release concerning Rocket's future expectations, plans and prospects, including without limitation, Rocket's expectations regarding the safety, effectiveness and timing of product candidates that Rocket may develop, to treat Fanconi Anemia (FA), Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency-I (LAD-I), Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD), Infantile Malignant Osteopetrosis (IMO) and Danon disease, and the safety, effectiveness and timing of related pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, may constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws and are subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should not place reliance on these forward-looking statements, which often include words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "will give," "estimate," "seek," "will," "may," "suggest" or similar terms, variations of such terms or the negative of those terms. Although Rocket believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, Rocket cannot guarantee such outcomes. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, without limitation, Rocket's ability to successfully demonstrate the efficacy and safety of such products and pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, its gene therapy programs, the pre-clinical and clinical results for its product candidates, which may not support further development and marketing approval, the potential advantages of Rocket's product candidates, actions of regulatory agencies, which may affect the initiation, timing and progress of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials of its product candidates, Rocket's and its licensors ability to obtain, maintain and protect its and their respective intellectual property, the timing, cost or other aspects of a potential commercial launch of Rocket's product candidates, Rocket's ability to manage operating expenses, Rocket's ability to obtain additional funding to support its business activities and establish and maintain strategic business alliances and new business initiatives, Rocket's dependence on third parties for development, manufacture, marketing, sales and distribution of product candidates, the outcome of litigation, and unexpected expenditures, as well as those risks more fully discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in Rocket's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All such statements speak only as of the date made, and Rocket undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

See the original post:
Rocket Pharmaceuticals Announces Upcoming Presentations at the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Annual Congress - Business Wire

Read More...

Comparing of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. (SPPI) and Provention Bio Inc. (NASDAQ:PRVB) – MS Wkly

Friday, October 18th, 2019

As Biotechnology businesses, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:SPPI) and Provention Bio Inc. (NASDAQ:PRVB), are affected by compare. This especially applies to their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

Table 1 highlights Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Provention Bio Inc.s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Profitability

Table 2 provides us Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Provention Bio Inc.s return on equity, net margins and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Provention Bio Inc. has shares held by institutional investors as follows: 75.6% and 6.3%. Insiders held 1.3% of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. shares. On the other hand, insiders held about 7.2% of Provention Bio Inc.s shares.

Performance

Here are the Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Half Yearly, Yearly and YTD Performance of both pretenders.

For the past year Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. had bearish trend while Provention Bio Inc. had bullish trend.

Summary

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. beats Provention Bio Inc. on 5 of the 9 factors.

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. develops and commercializes oncology and hematology drug products. The company markets six drug products, including FUSILEV for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and rescue after high-dose methotrexate therapy in osteosarcoma, and to diminish toxicity and counteract the effects of impaired methotrexate elimination and of inadvertent overdosage of folic acid antagonists; FOLOTYN, a folate analogue metabolic inhibitor to treat patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL; ZEVALIN injection for patients with follicular non-Hodgkins lymphoma; MARQIBO, a sphingomyelin/cholesterol liposome-encapsulated formulation for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia; BELEODAQ injection for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL; and EVOMELA for use as a conditioning treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients. It is also developing ROLONTIS for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; QAPZOLA for intravesical instillation in post-transurethral resection of bladder tumors in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; and POZIOTINIB for treating breast and lung cancer. The company sells its drugs through a direct sales force in the United States; and through distributors in Europe. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has licensing and development agreement with Cell Therapeutics, Inc.; license agreement with Merck & Cie AG, Sloan-Kettering Institute, and Cydex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; development and commercialization collaboration agreement with Allergan, Inc.; collaboration agreement with Nippon Kayaku Co., LTD.; licensing and collaboration agreement with Onxeo DK; and co-development and commercialization agreement with Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company. The company was formerly known as NeoTherapeutics, Inc. and changed its name to Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in December 2002. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was founded in 1987 and is headquartered in Henderson, Nevada.

Provention Bio, Inc., a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, focuses on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics and cutting-edge solutions to intercept and prevent immune-mediated diseases. Its products candidates include PRV-031 teplizumab and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that is in Phase III clinical trial for the interception of type one diabetes (T1D); PRV-6527, oral CSF-1R inhibitor, which is in Phase 2a clinical trial for the treatment of Crohn's disease; PRV-300, anti-TLR3 mAb, which is in Phase 1b clinical trial for the treatment of ulcerative colitis; PRV-3279 for the treatment of lupus; and PRV-101, a multivalent coxsackie virus vaccine for the prevention of acute Coxsackie Virus B Vaccine and the prevention of the onset of T1D. The company was incorporated in 2016 and is based in Oldwick, New Jersey.

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with our FREE daily email newsletter.

Continue reading here:
Comparing of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc. (SPPI) and Provention Bio Inc. (NASDAQ:PRVB) - MS Wkly

Read More...

Comparing of Trillium Therapeutics Inc. (TRIL) and Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:CDTX) – MS Wkly

Friday, October 18th, 2019

As Biotechnology businesses, Trillium Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:TRIL) and Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:CDTX), are affected by compare. This especially applies to their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation, institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

In table 1 we can see Trillium Therapeutics Inc. and Cidara Therapeutics Inc.s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Profitability

Table 2 has Trillium Therapeutics Inc. and Cidara Therapeutics Inc.s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

Institutional investors held 40.67% of Trillium Therapeutics Inc. shares and 69.6% of Cidara Therapeutics Inc. shares. Insiders held 0.26% of Trillium Therapeutics Inc. shares. Insiders Comparatively, held 1.5% of Cidara Therapeutics Inc. shares.

Performance

Here are the Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, Half Yearly, Yearly and YTD Performance of both pretenders.

For the past year Trillium Therapeutics Inc.s stock price has bigger decline than Cidara Therapeutics Inc.

Summary

On 6 of the 9 factors Trillium Therapeutics Inc. beats Cidara Therapeutics Inc.

Trillium Therapeutics Inc., a clinical-stage immuno-oncology company, develops therapies for the treatment of cancer. The companys lead program is TTI-621, a SIRPaFc fusion protein that acts a soluble decoy receptor preventing CD47 from delivering its inhibitory signal, which is in Phase I clinical trial for advanced hematologic malignancies and solid tumors therapy. Its product candidates also include TTI-622, an IgG4 SIRPaFc protein for combination therapy; bromodomain inhibitor; and epidermal growth factor receptor antagonist, which are in preclinical development stage, as well as undisclosed immuno-oncology targets that are in the discovery Phase. The company was formerly known as Stem Cell Therapeutics Corp. and changed its name to Trillium Therapeutics Inc. in June 2014. Trillium Therapeutics Inc. was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Mississauga, Canada.

Cidara Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, focuses on the discovery, development, and commercialization of novel anti-infectives for the treatment of various diseases. Its lead product candidate is CD101 IV, a novel molecule in the echinocandin class of antifungals for the treatment and prevention of serious, invasive fungal infections. The company also develops CD201, a novel bispecific antimicrobial immunotherapy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections, including those caused by pathogens harboring the mcr-1 plasmid. In addition, it develops a proprietary immunotherapy technology platform Cloudbreak, which is designed to create compounds that direct immune system to attack and eliminate bacterial, fungal or viral pathogens. The company was formerly known as K2 Therapeutics, Inc. and changed its name to Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. in June 2014. Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. was founded in 2012 and is based in San Diego, California.

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with our FREE daily email newsletter.

See more here:
Comparing of Trillium Therapeutics Inc. (TRIL) and Cidara Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:CDTX) - MS Wkly

Read More...

Global Cell Isolation Market Will Reach USD 15.16 Billion By 2025 – Daily Market Updates

Thursday, October 10th, 2019

The leading research firm Zion Market Research published a research report containing 110+ pages on "Cell Isolation Market by Product (Instruments and Consumables), by Cell Type (Animal and Human), by Cell Source (Adipose Tissue, Embryonic/Cord Blood Stem Cells, and Bone Marrow), by Technique (Surface Marker-Based Cell Isolation, Centrifugation-Based Cell Isolation, and Filtration-Based Cell Isolation), by Application (Cancer Research, Biomolecule Isolation, Tissue Regeneration & Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cell Research, In Vitro Diagnostics, and Others), and By End-User (Hospitals & Diagnostic Laboratories, Research Laboratories & Institutes, Biotechnology & Biopharmaceutical Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Merck KGaA, Beckman Coulter Inc., Terumo BCT, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., and Others): Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis, and Forecast, 20182025", which serves with all-inclusive, highly-effective, and thoroughly analyzed information in a well-organized manner, based on actual facts, about the Cell Isolation Market. The whole information from scratch to the financial and management level of the established industries associated with the Cell Isolation Market at the global level is initially acquired by the dedicated team. The gathered data involves the information about the industrys establishment, type and the form of products it manufactures, annual sales and revenue generation, the demand of the manufactured product in the market, marketing trends followed by the industry, and a lot more important information.

The industry analysts begin their task by compiling this huge pile of information, graphically expressing, anticipating the future market growth, offering the ways to improve the business, and many other important viewpoints explained by them in the Global Cell Isolation Market report.

Request Sample Copy of Cell Isolation Market Research Report @ https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/sample/cell-isolation-market

The Global Cell Isolation Market report elucidates the comprehensive analysis of the market-derived on the basis of regional division:

The report comprises precise analytical information related to market forecasts for several upcoming years. The report also includes the particulars about the valuation of macro and microelements significant for the growth of already established Cell Isolation Market contenders and emerging new companies.

The industries majorly comprise the global leading industries:

Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Merck KGaA, Beckman Coulter Inc., Terumo BCT, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

Request for PDF Brochure of This Report: https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/requestbrochure/cell-isolation-market

Report Brief:

The report covers forecast and analysis for the Global Cell Isolation Market on a global and regional level.

The report includes the positive and negative factors that are influencing the growth of the market.

Detailed information about market opportunities are discussed.

The key target audience for the market has been determined in the report.

The revenue generated by the prominent industry players has been analyzed in the report.

The market numbers have been calculated using top-down and bottom-up approaches.

The Global Cell Isolation Market has been analyzed using Porters Five Forces Analysis.

The market is segmented on the basis of Component, applications, connectivity, and end-user, which in turn bifurcated on the regional level as well.

All the segments have been evaluated based on present and future trends.

The report deals with the in-depth quantitative and qualitative analyses of the Cell Isolation Market.

The report includes detailed company profiles of the prominent market players.

Inquiry more about this report @ https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/inquiry/cell-isolation-market

The Global Cell Isolation Market report also delivers the accurately estimated pattern of CAGR to be followed by the market in the future. The numerous highlighted features and enactment of the Cell Isolation Market are examined based on the qualitative and quantitative technique to deliver the whole scenario of the current and future evaluation in a more effective and better understandable way.

The report covers a forecast and an analysis of the Cell Isolation Market on a global and regional level. The study provides historical data from 2015 to 2018 along with a forecast from 2019 to 2027 based on revenue (USD Billion). The study includes the drivers and restraints of the Cell Isolation Market along with their impact on the demand over the forecast period. Additionally, the report includes the study of opportunities available in the Cell Isolation Market on a global level.

In order to give the users a comprehensive view of the Cell Isolation Market, we have included a competitive landscape and an analysis of Porters Five Forces model for the market. The study encompasses a market attractiveness analysis, wherein all the segments are benchmarked based on their market size, growth rate, and general attractiveness.

For More Information, Read Detail Report Here: https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/cell-isolation-market

About Us:

Zion Market Research is an obligated company. We create futuristic, cutting edge, informative reports ranging from industry reports, company reports to country reports. We provide our clients not only with market statistics unveiled by avowed private publishers and public organizations but also with vogue and newest industry reports along with pre-eminent and niche company profiles. Our database of market research reports comprises a wide variety of reports from cardinal industries. Our database is been updated constantly in order to fulfill our clients with prompt and direct online access to our database. Keeping in mind the clients needs, we have included expert insights on global industries, products, and market trends in this database. Last but not the least, we make it our duty to ensure the success of clients connected to usafter allif you do well, a little of the light shines on us.

Contact Us:

Zion Market Research

244 Fifth Avenue, Suite N202

New York, 10001, United States

Tel: +49-322 210 92714

USA/Canada Toll-Free No.1-855-465-4651

Email: sales@zionmarketresearch.com

Website: https://www.zionmarketresearch.com

Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Read this article:
Global Cell Isolation Market Will Reach USD 15.16 Billion By 2025 - Daily Market Updates

Read More...

Global Stem Cell Therapy Market To Record Impressive Growth, Revenue To Surge To USD 4759.27 Million By 2024 – Industry News Reports

Thursday, October 10th, 2019

The leading research firm Zion Market Research published a research report containing 110+ pages on "Stem Cell Therapy Market by Type (Allogenic SCs and Autologous SCs) by Therapeutic Application (Musculoskeletal Disorders, Wounds & Injuries, Cardiovascular Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Immune System Diseases, and Others), by Cell Source (Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal SCs, Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal SCs, Embryonic SCs, and Other Sources), and by End User (Hospitals and ASCs): Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast, 2017 2024", which serves with all-inclusive, highly-effective, and thoroughly analyzed information in a well-organized manner, based on actual facts, about the Stem Cell Therapy Market. The whole information from scratch to the financial and management level of the established industries associated with the Stem Cell Therapy Market at the global level is initially acquired by the dedicated team. The gathered data involves the information about the industrys establishment, type and the form of products it manufactures, annual sales and revenue generation, the demand of the manufactured product in the market, marketing trends followed by the industry, and a lot more important information.

The industry analysts begin their task by compiling this huge pile of information, graphically expressing, anticipating the future market growth, offering the ways to improve the business, and many other important viewpoints explained by them in the Global Stem Cell Therapy Market report.

Request a Sample Report, To Get Brief Information About This Report@ http://www.zionmarketresearch.com/sample/stem-cell-therapy-market

The Global Stem Cell Therapy Market report elucidates the comprehensive analysis of the market-derived on the basis of regional division:

The report comprises precise analytical information related to market forecasts for several upcoming years. The report also includes the particulars about the valuation of macro and microelements significant for the growth of already established Stem Cell Therapy Market contenders and emerging new companies.

Some of the leading global leading market players profiles included in this report are:

Anterogen Co., Ltd., RTI SurgicalInc., Pharmicell Co., Ltd., MEDIPOST Co., Ltd., JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Holostem Terapie Avanzate S.r.l., NuVasiveInc., and AlloSource.

Request PDF Brochure to Receive Summary of This Report @www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/stem-cell-therapy-market

Report Brief:

The report covers forecast and analysis for the Global Stem Cell Therapy Market on a global and regional level.

The report includes the positive and negative factors that are influencing the growth of the market.

Detailed information about market opportunities are discussed.

The key target audience for the market has been determined in the report.

The revenue generated by the prominent industry players has been analyzed in the report.

The market numbers have been calculated using top-down and bottom-up approaches.

The Global Stem Cell Therapy Market has been analyzed using Porters Five Forces Analysis.

The market is segmented on the basis of Component, applications, connectivity, and end-user, which in turn bifurcated on the regional level as well.

All the segments have been evaluated based on present and future trends.

The report deals with the in-depth quantitative and qualitative analyses of the Stem Cell Therapy Market.

The report includes detailed company profiles of the prominent market players.

The Global Stem Cell Therapy Market report also delivers the accurately estimated pattern of CAGR to be followed by the market in the future. The numerous highlighted features and enactment of the Stem Cell Therapy Market are examined based on the qualitative and quantitative technique to deliver the whole scenario of the current and future evaluation in a more effective and better understandable way.

The report covers a forecast and an analysis of the Stem Cell Therapy Market on a global and regional level. The study provides historical data from 2015 to 2018 along with a forecast from 2019 to 2027 based on revenue (USD Billion). The study includes the drivers and restraints of the Stem Cell Therapy Market along with their impact on the demand over the forecast period. Additionally, the report includes the study of opportunities available in the Stem Cell Therapy Market on a global level.

In order to give the users a comprehensive view of the Stem Cell Therapy Market, we have included a competitive landscape and an analysis of Porters Five Forces model for the market. The study encompasses a market attractiveness analysis, wherein all the segments are benchmarked based on their market size, growth rate, and general attractiveness.

Detail Information on This Research Report is Available Here:www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/stem-cell-therapy-market

About Us:

Zion Market Research is an obligated company. We create futuristic, cutting edge, informative reports ranging from industry reports, company reports to country reports. We provide our clients not only with market statistics unveiled by avowed private publishers and public organizations but also with vogue and newest industry reports along with pre-eminent and niche company profiles. Our database of market research reports comprises a wide variety of reports from cardinal industries. Our database is been updated constantly in order to fulfill our clients with prompt and direct online access to our database. Keeping in mind the clients needs, we have included expert insights on global industries, products, and market trends in this database. Last but not the least, we make it our duty to ensure the success of clients connected to usafter allif you do well, a little of the light shines on us.

Contact Us:

Zion Market Research

244 Fifth Avenue, Suite N202

New York, 10001, United States

Tel: +49-322 210 92714

USA/Canada Toll-Free No.1-855-465-4651

Email: [emailprotected]

Website: http://www.zionmarketresearch.com

Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

See the rest here:
Global Stem Cell Therapy Market To Record Impressive Growth, Revenue To Surge To USD 4759.27 Million By 2024 - Industry News Reports

Read More...

Global Cell Expansion Market Share to Surpass USD 24921.3 Million By 2024: Zion Market Research – The Industry Today News

Thursday, October 10th, 2019

The leading research firm Zion Market Research published a research report containing 110+ pages on "Cell Expansion Market: by Product Type (Instruments, Consumables, and Disposables), by Application (Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Cancer and Cell-based Research and Other Applications), and by End-user (Research Institutes, Biopharmaceutical and Biotechnology Becton and Dickinson Company, Corning Incorporation, Danaher Corporation, GE Healthcare, Miltenyi Biotec, Merck Millipore, Sigma Aldrich Corporation, Stemcell Technologies, Terumo BCT, Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc. among others., Cell Banks and Other End Users For Different Cell Type(Human Cells and Animal Cells)) Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2017 2024", which serves with all-inclusive, highly-effective, and thoroughly analyzed information in a well-organized manner, based on actual facts, about the Cell Expansion Market. The whole information from scratch to the financial and management level of the established industries associated with the Cell Expansion Market at the global level is initially acquired by the dedicated team. The gathered data involves the information about the industrys establishment, type and the form of products it manufactures, annual sales and revenue generation, the demand of the manufactured product in the market, marketing trends followed by the industry, and a lot more important information.

The industry analysts begin their task by compiling this huge pile of information, graphically expressing, anticipating the future market growth, offering the ways to improve the business, and many other important viewpoints explained by them in the Global Cell Expansion Market report.

Request a Sample Report, To Get Brief Information About This Report@ http://www.zionmarketresearch.com/sample/cell-expansion-market

The Global Cell Expansion Market report elucidates the comprehensive analysis of the market-derived on the basis of regional division:

The report comprises precise analytical information related to market forecasts for several upcoming years. The report also includes the particulars about the valuation of macro and microelements significant for the growth of already established Cell Expansion Market contenders and emerging new companies.

Some of the leading global leading market players profiles included in this report are:

Becton and Dickinson Company, Corning Incorporation, Danaher Corporation, GE Healthcare, Miltenyi Biotec, Merck Millipore, Sigma Aldrich Corporation, Stemcell Technologies, Terumo BCT, Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc. among others.

Request PDF Brochure to Receive Summary of This Report @www.zionmarketresearch.com/requestbrochure/cell-expansion-market

Report Brief:

The report covers forecast and analysis for the Global Cell Expansion Market on a global and regional level.

The report includes the positive and negative factors that are influencing the growth of the market.

Detailed information about market opportunities are discussed.

The key target audience for the market has been determined in the report.

The revenue generated by the prominent industry players has been analyzed in the report.

The market numbers have been calculated using top-down and bottom-up approaches.

The Global Cell Expansion Market has been analyzed using Porters Five Forces Analysis.

The market is segmented on the basis of Component, applications, connectivity, and end-user, which in turn bifurcated on the regional level as well.

All the segments have been evaluated based on present and future trends.

The report deals with the in-depth quantitative and qualitative analyses of the Cell Expansion Market.

The report includes detailed company profiles of the prominent market players.

The Global Cell Expansion Market report also delivers the accurately estimated pattern of CAGR to be followed by the market in the future. The numerous highlighted features and enactment of the Cell Expansion Market are examined based on the qualitative and quantitative technique to deliver the whole scenario of the current and future evaluation in a more effective and better understandable way.

The report covers a forecast and an analysis of the Cell Expansion Market on a global and regional level. The study provides historical data from 2015 to 2018 along with a forecast from 2019 to 2027 based on revenue (USD Billion). The study includes the drivers and restraints of the Cell Expansion Market along with their impact on the demand over the forecast period. Additionally, the report includes the study of opportunities available in the Cell Expansion Market on a global level.

In order to give the users a comprehensive view of the Cell Expansion Market, we have included a competitive landscape and an analysis of Porters Five Forces model for the market. The study encompasses a market attractiveness analysis, wherein all the segments are benchmarked based on their market size, growth rate, and general attractiveness.

Detail Information on This Research Report is Available Here:www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/cell-expansion-market

About Us:

Zion Market Research is an obligated company. We create futuristic, cutting edge, informative reports ranging from industry reports, company reports to country reports. We provide our clients not only with market statistics unveiled by avowed private publishers and public organizations but also with vogue and newest industry reports along with pre-eminent and niche company profiles. Our database of market research reports comprises a wide variety of reports from cardinal industries. Our database is been updated constantly in order to fulfill our clients with prompt and direct online access to our database. Keeping in mind the clients needs, we have included expert insights on global industries, products, and market trends in this database. Last but not the least, we make it our duty to ensure the success of clients connected to usafter allif you do well, a little of the light shines on us.

Contact Us:

Zion Market Research

244 Fifth Avenue, Suite N202

New York, 10001, United States

Tel: +49-322 210 92714

USA/Canada Toll-Free No.1-855-465-4651

Email: sales@zionmarketresearch.com

Website: http://www.zionmarketresearch.com

Sorry! The Author has not filled his profile.

Read the original:
Global Cell Expansion Market Share to Surpass USD 24921.3 Million By 2024: Zion Market Research - The Industry Today News

Read More...

11 Abnormal Pap Smear Causes You Should Know – HPV Negative?

Tuesday, October 8th, 2019

Many diseases that women suffer from could have been properly managed if they were detected and diagnosed early with health screening tests that are recommended to undergo regularly.

These medical checks are meant to detect traces or symptoms of serious health issues such as cancer or HPV infections, with a Pap Smear test is one of such screening procedures.

A Pap smear, also known as the Papanicolaou test, is a quick and relatively painless test carried out to screen for cancer or precancer symptoms in the cervix. Women are compelled to undergo regular Pap smear tests when they visit the gynecologist.

The process of carrying out a Pap smear test involves getting some of the cells in the patients cervix, and examining them under a microscope to see if there are any abnormal cells in the sample. The discovery of abnormal cells is an indication that the patient might be prone to suffering from cervical cancer or precancerous indication of cervical dysplasia.

The recommended next steps after a Pap smear test will depend on the kind of abnormality and other relevant results discovered in the cells diagnosis:

When Pap screening test results show abnormal, it is understandable that your first immediate reaction is shocked and alarmed, as abnormal Pap smears results may indicate there is abnormal cells or infection known as dysplasia.

According to Australia Cancer Council, around 1 in 10 Pap smears show abnormal results, with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common cause of abnormal Pap smears.

Further evaluation would be required to determine if the HPV strains discovered are high-risk HPV type that have the tendency to cause cancer, or its low-risk HPV types that can cause warts.There are over 100 different types of HPV, with the high-risk HPV16 and HPV18 strains cause 70% of cervical cancers and precancerous cervical lesions.

The distortion of normal cells features in the cervix can occur when high-risk HPV strains find their way into the cervix to work against the skin cells and make them abnormal. This is a medical condition called cervical dysplasia.

The low-risk HPV virus that causes genital warts can cause abnormal results on a Pap smear, says MedlinePlus. If you have these symptoms, you may need a colposcopy or more frequent Pap smears.

Having abnormal Pap smear does not mean you have cancer.

While the common cause of abnormal Pap smear test results is the presence of HPV, this is not an indication that the patient is definitely infected by HPV and has cervical cancer, because there are also patients who have HPV-negative abnormal pap smear test results without any HPV detected.

Dr. Duncan Burkholder discusses abnormal pap smear and HPV in brief video below.

According to the American Pregnancy Association, WebMD, Queensland Government, Medscape, and SteadyHealth

Besides HPV, the other abnormal Pap smear causes include vaginal infections as well as some common sexually transmitted diseases (STD) that can cause cervix inflammation and lead to abnormal Pap test results:

>> You Can Test Trichomoniasis, Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at Home with OTC Test Kit

As revealed by OncoLink, when the results of a Pap smear tests indicate the presence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS):

HPV test is reported as either HPV positive or HPV negative:

By conducting the tests above, the physicians will have more convincing evidence to back up the Pap smear tests. They would also know if the patient is being affected by other gynecological issues.

The standard process before the commencement of treatment is to carry out a Colposcopy, a typical biopsy with comprehensive study of tissue samples from the patients cervix with a microscope.

The results of the Colposcopy will determine the treatment process that should be started. At this stage, the level of abnormality of the cells would have been ascertained.

Treatment processes aim at eliminating the abnormal cells:

In video below, Dr. Stephen Buckley and Dr. discussed abnormal Pap smear treatment and steps to take following an abnormal Pap smear results depend on severity of cell changes.

Read the original:
11 Abnormal Pap Smear Causes You Should Know - HPV Negative?

Read More...

How to change positive numbers to negative … – ExtendOffice

Tuesday, October 8th, 2019

How can you quickly change all positive numbers or values to negative in Excel? The following methods can guide you to quickly change all positive numbers to negative in Excel.

Change positive numbers to negative with Paste Special function

Change positive numbers to negative with VBA code

Change positive numbers to negative or vice versa with Kutools for Excel

Change or convert positive numbers to negatives and vice versa:

With Kutools for Excels Change Sign of Values utility, you can change the positive numbers to negative or vice versa, reverse the sign of numbers, fix trailing negative signs, and so on.

You can change positive numbers to negative with Paste Special function in Excel. Please do as follows.

1. Tap number -1 in a blank cell and copy it.

2. Highlight the range that you want to change, then right-click and choose Paste Special from the context menu to open the Paste Special dialog box. See screenshot:

3. Then select All option from the Paste, and Multiply from the Operation.

4. And then click OK, all of the positive numbers have been changed to negative numbers.

5. At last, you can delete the number -1 as you need.

Using VBA code, you can also change positive numbers to negative, but you must know how to use a VBA. Please do as the following steps:

1. Select the range that you want to change.

2. Click Developer >Visual Basic, a new Microsoft Visual Basic for applications window will be displayed, click Insert > Moduleand then copy and paste the following codes in the module:

3. Click button to run the code, a dialog is popped out for you to select a range that you want to convert the posItive values to negative. See screenshot:

4. Click Ok, then the positive values in the selected range is converted to negative at once.

You can also use Kutools for Excels Change Sign of Values tool to quickly change all positive numbers to negative.

If you have installed Kutools for Excel, you can change positive numbers to negative as follows:

1. Select the range you want to change.

2. Click Kutools > Content > Change Sign of Values, see screenshot:

3. And in the Change Sign of Values dialog box, select Change all positive values to negative option.

4. Then click OK or Apply. And all of the positive numbers have been converted to negative numbers.

Tips: To change or convert all the negative numbers to positive, please choose Change all negative values to positive in the dialog box as following screenshot shown:

Kutools for Excels Change Sign of Values can also fix trailing negative signs, change all negative values to positive and so on. For more detailed information about Change Sign of Values, please visit Change Sign of Values feature description.

Click to Download and free trial Kutools for Excel Now!

Related articles:

Change negative numbers to positive

Reverse signs of values in cells

Fix trailing negative signs in cells

Kutools for Excel Solves Most of Your Problems, and Increases Your Productivity by80%

Office Tab Brings Tabbed interface to Office, and Make Your Work Much Easier

See the rest here:
How to change positive numbers to negative ... - ExtendOffice

Read More...

4. The Adult Stem Cell | stemcells.nih.gov

Saturday, October 5th, 2019

For many years, researchers have been seeking to understand the body's ability to repair and replace the cells and tissues of some organs, but not others. After years of work pursuing the how and why of seemingly indiscriminant cell repair mechanisms, scientists have now focused their attention on adult stem cells. It has long been known that stem cells are capable of renewing themselves and that they can generate multiple cell types. Today, there is new evidence that stem cells are present in far more tissues and organs than once thought and that these cells are capable of developing into more kinds of cells than previously imagined. Efforts are now underway to harness stem cells and to take advantage of this new found capability, with the goal of devising new and more effective treatments for a host of diseases and disabilities. What lies ahead for the use of adult stem cells is unknown, but it is certain that there are many research questions to be answered and that these answers hold great promise for the future.

Adult stem cells, like all stem cells, share at least two characteristics. First, they can make identical copies of themselves for long periods of time; this ability to proliferate is referred to as long-term self-renewal. Second, they can give rise to mature cell types that have characteristic morphologies (shapes) and specialized functions. Typically, stem cells generate an intermediate cell type or types before they achieve their fully differentiated state. The intermediate cell is called a precursor or progenitor cell. Progenitor or precursor cells in fetal or adult tissues are partly differentiated cells that divide and give rise to differentiated cells. Such cells are usually regarded as "committed" to differentiating along a particular cellular development pathway, although this characteristic may not be as definitive as once thought [82] (see Figure 4.1. Distinguishing Features of Progenitor/Precursor Cells and Stem Cells).

Figure 4.1. Distinguishing Features of Progenitor/Precursor Cells and Stem Cells. A stem cell is an unspecialized cell that is capable of replicating or self renewing itself and developing into specialized cells of a variety of cell types. The product of a stem cell undergoing division is at least one additional stem cell that has the same capabilities of the originating cell. Shown here is an example of a hematopoietic stem cell producing a second generation stem cell and a neuron. A progenitor cell (also known as a precursor cell) is unspecialized or has partial characteristics of a specialized cell that is capable of undergoing cell division and yielding two specialized cells. Shown here is an example of a myeloid progenitor/precursor undergoing cell division to yield two specialized cells (a neutrophil and a red blood cell).

( 2001 Terese Winslow, Lydia Kibiuk)

Adult stem cells are rare. Their primary functions are to maintain the steady state functioning of a cellcalled homeostasisand, with limitations, to replace cells that die because of injury or disease [44, 58]. For example, only an estimated 1 in 10,000 to 15,000 cells in the bone marrow is a hematopoietic (bloodforming) stem cell (HSC) [105]. Furthermore, adult stem cells are dispersed in tissues throughout the mature animal and behave very differently, depending on their local environment. For example, HSCs are constantly being generated in the bone marrow where they differentiate into mature types of blood cells. Indeed, the primary role of HSCs is to replace blood cells [26] (see Chapter 5. Hematopoietic Stem Cells). In contrast, stem cells in the small intestine are stationary, and are physically separated from the mature cell types they generate. Gut epithelial stem cells (or precursors) occur at the bases of cryptsdeep invaginations between the mature, differentiated epithelial cells that line the lumen of the intestine. These epithelial crypt cells divide fairly often, but remain part of the stationary group of cells they generate [93].

Unlike embryonic stem cells, which are defined by their origin (the inner cell mass of the blastocyst), adult stem cells share no such definitive means of characterization. In fact, no one knows the origin of adult stem cells in any mature tissue. Some have proposed that stem cells are somehow set aside during fetal development and restrained from differentiating. Definitions of adult stem cells vary in the scientific literature range from a simple description of the cells to a rigorous set of experimental criteria that must be met before characterizing a particular cell as an adult stem cell. Most of the information about adult stem cells comes from studies of mice. The list of adult tissues reported to contain stem cells is growing and includes bone marrow, peripheral blood, brain, spinal cord, dental pulp, blood vessels, skeletal muscle, epithelia of the skin and digestive system, cornea, retina, liver, and pancreas.

In order to be classified as an adult stem cell, the cell should be capable of self-renewal for the lifetime of the organism. This criterion, although fundamental to the nature of a stem cell, is difficult to prove in vivo. It is nearly impossible, in an organism as complex as a human, to design an experiment that will allow the fate of candidate adult stem cells to be identified in vivo and tracked over an individual's entire lifetime.

Ideally, adult stem cells should also be clonogenic. In other words, a single adult stem cell should be able to generate a line of genetically identical cells, which then gives rise to all the appropriate, differentiated cell types of the tissue in which it resides. Again, this property is difficult to demonstrate in vivo; in practice, scientists show either that a stem cell is clonogenic in vitro, or that a purified population of candidate stem cells can repopulate the tissue.

An adult stem cell should also be able to give rise to fully differentiated cells that have mature phenotypes, are fully integrated into the tissue, and are capable of specialized functions that are appropriate for the tissue. The term phenotype refers to all the observable characteristics of a cell (or organism); its shape (morphology); interactions with other cells and the non-cellular environment (also called the extracellular matrix); proteins that appear on the cell surface (surface markers); and the cell's behavior (e.g., secretion, contraction, synaptic transmission).

The majority of researchers who lay claim to having identified adult stem cells rely on two of these characteristicsappropriate cell morphology, and the demonstration that the resulting, differentiated cell types display surface markers that identify them as belonging to the tissue. Some studies demonstrate that the differentiated cells that are derived from adult stem cells are truly functional, and a few studies show that cells are integrated into the differentiated tissue in vivo and that they interact appropriately with neighboring cells. At present, there is, however, a paucity of research, with a few notable exceptions, in which researchers were able to conduct studies of genetically identical (clonal) stem cells. In order to fully characterize the regenerating and self-renewal capabilities of the adult stem cell, and therefore to truly harness its potential, it will be important to demonstrate that a single adult stem cell can, indeed, generate a line of genetically identical cells, which then gives rise to all the appropriate, differentiated cell types of the tissue in which it resides.

Adult stem cells have been identified in many animal and human tissues. In general, three methods are used to determine whether candidate adult stem cells give rise to specialized cells. Adult stem cells can be labeled in vivo and then they can be tracked. Candidate adult stem cells can also be isolated and labeled and then transplanted back into the organism to determine what becomes of them. Finally, candidate adult stem cells can be isolated, grown in vitro and manipulated, by adding growth factors or introducing genes that help determine what differentiated cells types they will yield. For example, currently, scientists believe that stem cells in the fetal and adult brain divide and give rise to more stem cells or to several types of precursor cells, which give rise to nerve cells (neurons), of which there are many types.

It is often difficultif not impossibleto distinguish adult, tissue-specific stem cells from progenitor cells, which are found in fetal or adult tissues and are partly differentiated cells that divide and give rise to differentiated cells. These are cells found in many organs that are generally thought to be present to replace cells and maintain the integrity of the tissue. Progenitor cells give rise to certain types of cellssuch as the blood cells known as T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and natural killer cellsbut are not thought to be capable of developing into all the cell types of a tissue and as such are not truly stem cells. The current wave of excitement over the existence of stem cells in many adult tissues is perhaps fueling claims that progenitor or precursor cells in those tissues are instead stem cells. Thus, there are reports of endothelial progenitor cells, skeletal muscle stem cells, epithelial precursors in the skin and digestive system, as well as some reports of progenitors or stem cells in the pancreas and liver. A detailed summary of some of the evidence for the existence of stem cells in various tissues and organs is presented later in the chapter.

It was not until recently that anyone seriously considered the possibility that stem cells in adult tissues could generate the specialized cell types of another type of tissue from which they normally resideeither a tissue derived from the same embryonic germ layer or from a different germ layer (see Table 1.1. Embryonic Germ Layers From Which Differentiated Tissues Develop). For example, studies have shown that blood stem cells (derived from mesoderm) may be able to generate both skeletal muscle (also derived from mesoderm) and neurons (derived from ectoderm). That realization has been triggered by a flurry of papers reporting that stem cells derived from one adult tissue can change their appearance and assume characteristics that resemble those of differentiated cells from other tissues.

The term plasticity, as used in this report, means that a stem cell from one adult tissue can generate the differentiated cell types of another tissue. At this time, there is no formally accepted name for this phenomenon in the scientific literature. It is variously referred to as "plasticity" [15, 52], "unorthodox differentiation" [10] or "transdifferentiation" [7, 54].

To be able to claim that adult stem cells demonstrate plasticity, it is first important to show that a cell population exists in the starting tissue that has the identifying features of stem cells. Then, it is necessary to show that the adult stem cells give rise to cell types that normally occur in a different tissue. Neither of these criteria is easily met. Simply proving the existence of an adult stem cell population in a differentiated tissue is a laborious process. It requires that the candidate stem cells are shown to be self-renewing, and that they can give rise to the differentiated cell types that are characteristic of that tissue.

To show that the adult stem cells can generate other cell types requires them to be tracked in their new environment, whether it is in vitro or in vivo. In general, this has been accomplished by obtaining the stem cells from a mouse that has been genetically engineered to express a molecular tag in all its cells. It is then necessary to show that the labeled adult stem cells have adopted key structural and biochemical characteristics of the new tissue they are claimed to have generated. Ultimatelyand most importantlyit is necessary to demonstrate that the cells can integrate into their new tissue environment, survive in the tissue, and function like the mature cells of the tissue.

In the experiments reported to date, adult stem cells may assume the characteristics of cells that have developed from the same primary germ layer or a different germ layer (see Figure 4.2. Preliminary Evidence of Plasticity Among Nonhuman Adult Stem Cells). For example, many plasticity experiments involve stem cells derived from bone marrow, which is a mesodermal derivative. The bone marrow stem cells may then differentiate into another mesodermally derived tissue such as skeletal muscle [28, 43], cardiac muscle [51, 71] or liver [4, 54, 97].

Figure 4.2. Preliminary Evidence of Plasticity Among Nonhuman Adult Stem Cells.

( 2001 Terese Winslow, Lydia Kibiuk, Caitlin Duckwall)

Alternatively, adult stem cells may differentiate into a tissue thatduring normal embryonic developmentwould arise from a different germ layer. For example, bone marrow-derived cells may differentiate into neural tissue, which is derived from embryonic ectoderm [15, 65]. Andreciprocallyneural stem cell lines cultured from adult brain tissue may differentiate to form hematopoietic cells [13], or even give rise to many different cell types in a chimeric embryo [17]. In both cases cited above, the cells would be deemed to show plasticity, but in the case of bone marrow stem cells generating brain cells, the finding is less predictable.

In order to study plasticity within and across germ layer lines, the researcher must be sure that he/she is using only one kind of adult stem cell. The vast majority of experiments on plasticity have been conducted with adult stem cells derived either from the bone marrow or the brain. The bone marrow-derived cells are sometimes sortedusing a panel of surface markersinto populations of hematopoietic stem cells or bone marrow stromal cells [46, 54, 71]. The HSCs may be highly purified or partially purified, depending on the conditions used. Another way to separate population of bone marrow cells is by fractionation to yield cells that adhere to a growth substrate (stromal cells) or do not adhere (hematopoietic cells) [28].

To study plasticity of stem cells derived from the brain, the researcher must overcome several problems. Stem cells from the central nervous system (CNS), unlike bone marrow cells, do not occur in a single, accessible location. Instead, they are scattered in three places, at least in rodent brainthe tissue around the lateral ventricles in the forebrain, a migratory pathway for the cells that leads from the ventricles to the olfactory bulbs, and the hippocampus. Many of the experiments with CNS stem cells involve the formation of neurospheres, round aggregates of cells that are sometimes clonally derived. But it is not possible to observe cells in the center of a neurosphere, so to study plasticity in vitro, the cells are usually dissociated and plated in monolayers. To study plasticity in vivo, the cells may be dissociated before injection into the circulatory system of the recipient animal [13], or injected as neurospheres [17].

The differentiated cell types that result from plasticity are usually reported to have the morphological characteristics of the differentiated cells and to display their characteristic surface markers. In reports that transplanted adult stem cells show plasticity in vivo, the stem cells typically are shown to have integrated into a mature host tissue and assumed at least some of its characteristics [15, 28, 51, 65, 71]. Many plasticity experiments involve injury to a particular tissue, which is intended to model a particular human disease or injury [13, 54, 71]. However, there is limited evidence to date that such adult stem cells can generate mature, fully functional cells or that the cells have restored lost function in vivo [54]. Most of the studies that show the plasticity of adult stem cells involve cells that are derived from the bone marrow [15, 28, 54, 65, 77] or brain [13, 17]. To date, adult stem cells are best characterized in these two tissues, which may account for the greater number of plasticity studies based on bone marrow and brain. Collectively, studies on plasticity suggest that stem cell populations in adult mammals are not fixed entities, and that after exposure to a new environment, they may be able to populate other tissues and possibly differentiate into other cell types.

It is not yet possible to say whether plasticity occurs normally in vivo. Some scientists think it may [14, 64], but as yet there is no evidence to prove it. Also, it is not yet clear to what extent plasticity can occur in experimental settings, and howor whetherthe phenomenon can be harnessed to generate tissues that may be useful for therapeutic transplantation. If the phenomenon of plasticity is to be used as a basis for generating tissue for transplantation, the techniques for doing it will need to be reproducible and reliable (see Chapter 10. Assessing Human Stem Cell Safety). In some cases, debate continues about observations that adult stem cells yield cells of tissue types different than those from which they were obtained [7, 68].

More than 30 years ago, Altman and Das showed that two regions of the postnatal rat brain, the hippocampus and the olfactory bulb, contain dividing cells that become neurons [5, 6]. Despite these reports, the prevailing view at the time was that nerve cells in the adult brain do not divide. In fact, the notion that stem cells in the adult brain can generate its three major cell typesastrocytes and oligodendrocytes, as well as neuronswas not accepted until far more recently. Within the past five years, a series of studies has shown that stem cells occur in the adult mammalian brain and that these cells can generate its three major cell lineages [35, 48, 63, 66, 90, 96, 104] (see Chapter 8. Rebuilding the Nervous System with Stem Cells).

Today, scientists believe that stem cells in the fetal and adult brain divide and give rise to more stem cells or to several types of precursor cells. Neuronal precursors (also called neuroblasts) divide and give rise to nerve cells (neurons), of which there are many types. Glial precursors give rise to astrocytes or oligodendrocytes. Astrocytes are a kind of glial cell, which lend both mechanical and metabolic support for neurons; they make up 70 to 80 percent of the cells of the adult brain. Oligodendrocytes make myelin, the fatty material that ensheathes nerve cell axons and speeds nerve transmission. Under normal, in vivo conditions, neuronal precursors do not give rise to glial cells, and glial precursors do not give rise to neurons. In contrast, a fetal or adult CNS (central nervous systemthe brain and spinal cord) stem cell may give rise to neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes, depending on the signals it receives and its three-dimensional environment within the brain tissue. There is now widespread consensus that the adult mammalian brain does contain stem cells. However, there is no consensus about how many populations of CNS stem cells exist, how they may be related, and how they function in vivo. Because there are no markers currently available to identify the cells in vivo, the only method for testing whether a given population of CNS cells contains stem cells is to isolate the cells and manipulate them in vitro, a process that may change their intrinsic properties [67].

Despite these barriers, three groups of CNS stem cells have been reported to date. All occur in the adult rodent brain and preliminary evidence indicates they also occur in the adult human brain. One group occupies the brain tissue next to the ventricles, regions known as the ventricular zone and the sub-ventricular zone (see discussion below). The ventricles are spaces in the brain filled with cerebrospinal fluid. During fetal development, the tissue adjacent to the ventricles is a prominent region of actively dividing cells. By adulthood, however, this tissue is much smaller, although it still appears to contain stem cells [70].

A second group of adult CNS stem cells, described in mice but not in humans, occurs in a streak of tissue that connects the lateral ventricle and the olfactory bulb, which receives odor signals from the nose. In rodents, olfactory bulb neurons are constantly being replenished via this pathway [59, 61]. A third possible location for stem cells in adult mouse and human brain occurs in the hippocampus, a part of the brain thought to play a role in the formation of certain kinds of memory [27, 34].

Central Nervous System Stem Cells in the Subventricular Zone. CNS stem cells found in the forebrain that surrounds the lateral ventricles are heterogeneous and can be distinguished morphologically. Ependymal cells, which are ciliated, line the ventricles. Adjacent to the ependymal cell layer, in a region sometimes designated as the subependymal or subventricular zone, is a mixed cell population that consists of neuroblasts (immature neurons) that migrate to the olfactory bulb, precursor cells, and astrocytes. Some of the cells divide rapidly, while others divide slowly. The astrocyte-like cells can be identified because they contain glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), whereas the ependymal cells stain positive for nestin, which is regarded as a marker of neural stem cells. Which of these cells best qualifies as a CNS stem cell is a matter of debate [76].

A recent report indicates that the astrocytes that occur in the subventricular zone of the rodent brain act as neural stem cells. The cells with astrocyte markers appear to generate neurons in vivo, as identified by their expression of specific neuronal markers. The in vitro assay to demonstrate that these astrocytes are, in fact, stem cells involves their ability to form neurospheresgroupings of undifferentiated cells that can be dissociated and coaxed to differentiate into neurons or glial cells [25]. Traditionally, these astrocytes have been regarded as differentiated cells, not as stem cells and so their designation as stem cells is not universally accepted.

A series of similar in vitro studies based on the formation of neurospheres was used to identify the subependymal zone as a source of adult rodent CNS stem cells. In these experiments, single, candidate stem cells derived from the subependymal zone are induced to give rise to neurospheres in the presence of mitogenseither epidermal growth factor (EGF) or fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). The neurospheres are dissociated and passaged. As long as a mitogen is present in the culture medium, the cells continue forming neurospheres without differentiating. Some populations of CNS cells are more responsive to EGF, others to FGF [100]. To induce differentiation into neurons or glia, cells are dissociated from the neurospheres and grown on an adherent surface in serum-free medium that contains specific growth factors. Collectively, the studies demonstrate that a population of cells derived from the adult rodent brain can self-renew and differentiate to yield the three major cell types of the CNS cells [41, 69, 74, 102].

Central Nervous System Stem Cells in the Ventricular Zone. Another group of potential CNS stem cells in the adult rodent brain may consist of the ependymal cells themselves [47]. Ependymal cells, which are ciliated, line the lateral ventricles. They have been described as non-dividing cells [24] that function as part of the blood-brain barrier [22]. The suggestion that ependymal cells from the ventricular zone of the adult rodent CNS may be stem cells is therefore unexpected. However, in a recent study, in which two molecular tagsthe fluorescent marker Dil, and an adenovirus vector carrying lacZ tagswere used to label the ependymal cells that line the entire CNS ventricular system of adult rats, it was shown that these cells could, indeed, act as stem cells. A few days after labeling, fluorescent or lacZ+ cells were observed in the rostral migratory stream (which leads from the lateral ventricle to the olfactory bulb), and then in the olfactory bulb itself. The labeled cells in the olfactory bulb also stained for the neuronal markers III tubulin and Map2, which indicated that ependymal cells from the ventricular zone of the adult rat brain had migrated along the rostral migratory stream to generate olfactory bulb neurons in vivo [47].

To show that Dil+ cells were neural stem cells and could generate astrocytes and oligodendrocytes as well as neurons, a neurosphere assay was performed in vitro. Dil-labeled cells were dissociated from the ventricular system and cultured in the presence of mitogen to generate neurospheres. Most of the neurospheres were Dil+; they could self-renew and generate neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes when induced to differentiate. Single, Dil+ ependymal cells isolated from the ventricular zone could also generate self-renewing neurospheres and differentiate into neurons and glia.

To show that ependymal cells can also divide in vivo, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was administered in the drinking water to rats for a 2- to 6-week period. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) is a DNA precursor that is only incorporated into dividing cells. Through a series of experiments, it was shown that ependymal cells divide slowly in vivo and give rise to a population of progenitor cells in the subventricular zone [47]. A different pattern of scattered BrdU-labeled cells was observed in the spinal cord, which suggested that ependymal cells along the central canal of the cord occasionally divide and give rise to nearby ependymal cells, but do not migrate away from the canal.

Collectively, the data suggest that CNS ependymal cells in adult rodents can function as stem cells. The cells can self-renew, and most proliferate via asymmetrical division. Many of the CNS ependymal cells are not actively dividing (quiescent), but they can be stimulated to do so in vitro (with mitogens) or in vivo (in response to injury). After injury, the ependymal cells in the spinal cord only give rise to astrocytes, not to neurons. How and whether ependymal cells from the ventricular zone are related to other candidate populations of CNS stem cells, such as those identified in the hippocampus [34], is not known.

Are ventricular and subventricular zone CNS stem cells the same population? These studies and other leave open the question of whether cells that directly line the ventriclesthose in the ventricular zoneor cells that are at least a layer removed from this zonein the subventricular zone are the same population of CNS stem cells. A new study, based on the finding that they express different genes, confirms earlier reports that the ventricular and subventricular zone cell populations are distinct. The new research utilizes a technique called representational difference analysis, together with cDNA microarray analysis, to monitor the patterns of gene expression in the complex tissue of the developing and postnatal mouse brain. The study revealed the expression of a panel of genes known to be important in CNS development, such as L3-PSP (which encodes a phosphoserine phosphatase important in cell signaling), cyclin D2 (a cell cycle gene), and ERCC-1 (which is important in DNA excision repair). All of these genes in the recent study were expressed in cultured neurospheres, as well as the ventricular zone, the subventricular zone, and a brain area outside those germinal zones. This analysis also revealed the expression of novel genes such as A16F10, which is similar to a gene in an embryonic cancer cell line. A16F10 was expressed in neurospheres and at high levels in the subventricular zone, but not significantly in the ventricular zone. Interestingly, several of the genes identified in cultured neurospheres were also expressed in hematopoietic cells, suggesting that neural stem cells and blood-forming cells may share aspects of their genetic programs or signaling systems [38]. This finding may help explain recent reports that CNS stem cells derived from mouse brain can give rise to hematopoietic cells after injection into irradiated mice [13].

Central Nervous System Stem Cells in the Hippocampus. The hippocampus is one of the oldest parts of the cerebral cortex, in evolutionary terms, and is thought to play an important role in certain forms of memory. The region of the hippocampus in which stem cells apparently exist in mouse and human brains is the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus. In mice, when BrdU is used to label dividing cells in this region, about 50% of the labeled cells differentiate into cells that appear to be dentate gyrus granule neurons, and 15% become glial cells. The rest of the BrdU-labeled cells do not have a recognizable phenotype [90]. Interestingly, many, if not all the BrdU-labeled cells in the adult rodent hippocampus occur next to blood vessels [33].

In the human dentate gyrus, some BrdU-labeled cells express NeuN, neuron-specific enolase, or calbindin, all of which are neuronal markers. The labeled neuron-like cells resemble dentate gyrus granule cells, in terms of their morphology (as they did in mice). Other BrdU-labeled cells express glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) an astrocyte marker. The study involved autopsy material, obtained with family consent, from five cancer patients who had been injected with BrdU dissolved in saline prior to their death for diagnostic purposes. The patients ranged in age from 57 to 72 years. The greatest number of BrdU-labeled cells were identified in the oldest patient, suggesting that new neuron formation in the hippocampus can continue late in life [27].

Fetal Central Nervous System Stem Cells. Not surprisingly, fetal stem cells are numerous in fetal tissues, where they are assumed to play an important role in the expansion and differentiation of all tissues of the developing organism. Depending on the developmental stage of an animal, fetal stem cells and precursor cellswhich arise from stem cellsmay make up the bulk of a tissue. This is certainly true in the brain [48], although it has not been demonstrated experimentally in many tissues.

It may seem obvious that the fetal brain contains stem cells that can generate all the types of neurons in the brain as well as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, but it was not until fairly recently that the concept was proven experimentally. There has been a long-standing question as to whether or not the same cell type gives rise to both neurons and glia. In studies of the developing rodent brain, it has now been shown that all the major cell types in the fetal brain arise from a common population of progenitor cells [20, 34, 48, 80, 108].

Neural stem cells in the mammalian fetal brain are concentrated in seven major areas: olfactory bulb, ependymal (ventricular) zone of the lateral ventricles (which lie in the forebrain), subventricular zone (next to the ependymal zone), hippocampus, spinal cord, cerebellum (part of the hindbrain), and the cerebral cortex. Their number and pattern of development vary in different species. These cells appear to represent different stem cell populations, rather than a single population of stem cells that is dispersed in multiple sites. The normal development of the brain depends not only on the proliferation and differentiation of these fetal stem cells, but also on a genetically programmed process of selective cell death called apoptosis [76].

Little is known about stem cells in the human fetal brain. In one study, however, investigators derived clonal cell lines from CNS stem cells isolated from the diencephalon and cortex of human fetuses, 10.5 weeks post-conception [103]. The study is unusual, not only because it involves human CNS stem cells obtained from fetal tissue, but also because the cells were used to generate clonal cell lines of CNS stem cells that generated neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, as determined on the basis of expressed markers. In a few experiments described as "preliminary," the human CNS stem cells were injected into the brains of immunosuppressed rats where they apparently differentiated into neuron-like cells or glial cells.

In a 1999 study, a serum-free growth medium that included EGF and FGF2 was devised to grow the human fetal CNS stem cells. Although most of the cells died, occasionally, single CNS stem cells survived, divided, and ultimately formed neurospheres after one to two weeks in culture. The neurospheres could be dissociated and individual cells replated. The cells resumed proliferation and formed new neurospheres, thus establishing an in vitro system that (like the system established for mouse CNS neurospheres) could be maintained up to 2 years. Depending on the culture conditions, the cells in the neurospheres could be maintained in an undifferentiated dividing state (in the presence of mitogen), or dissociated and induced to differentiate (after the removal of mitogen and the addition of specific growth factors to the culture medium). The differentiated cells consisted mostly of astrocytes (75%), some neurons (13%) and rare oligodendrocytes (1.2%). The neurons generated under these conditions expressed markers indicating they were GABAergic, [the major type of inhibitory neuron in the mammalian CNS responsive to the amino acid neurotransmitter, gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA)]. However, catecholamine-like cells that express tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, a critical enzyme in the dopamine-synthesis pathway) could be generated, if the culture conditions were altered to include different medium conditioned by a rat glioma line (BB49). Thus, the report indicates that human CNS stem cells obtained from early fetuses can be maintained in vitro for a long time without differentiating, induced to differentiate into the three major lineages of the CNS (and possibly two kinds of neurons, GABAergic and TH-positive), and engraft (in rats) in vivo [103].

Central Nervous System Neural Crest Stem Cells. Neural crest cells differ markedly from fetal or adult neural stem cells. During fetal development, neural crest cells migrate from the sides of the neural tube as it closes. The cells differentiate into a range of tissues, not all of which are part of the nervous system [56, 57, 91]. Neural crest cells form the sympathetic and parasympathetic components of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), including the network of nerves that innervate the heart and the gut, all the sensory ganglia (groups of neurons that occur in pairs along the dorsal surface of the spinal cord), and Schwann cells, which (like oligodendrocytes in the CNS) make myelin in the PNS. The non-neural tissues that arise from the neural crest are diverse. They populate certain hormone-secreting glandsincluding the adrenal medulla and Type I cells in the carotid bodypigment cells of the skin (melanocytes), cartilage and bone in the face and skull, and connective tissue in many parts of the body [76].

Thus, neural crest cells migrate far more extensively than other fetal neural stem cells during development, form mesenchymal tissues, most of which develop from embryonic mesoderm as well as the components of the CNS and PNS which arises from embryonic ectoderm. This close link, in neural crest development, between ectodermally derived tissues and mesodermally derived tissues accounts in part for the interest in neural crest cells as a kind of stem cell. In fact, neural crest cells meet several criteria of stem cells. They can self-renew (at least in the fetus) and can differentiate into multiple cells types, which include cells derived from two of the three embryonic germ layers [76].

Recent studies indicate that neural crest cells persist late into gestation and can be isolated from E14.5 rat sciatic nerve, a peripheral nerve in the hindlimb. The cells incorporate BrdU, indicating that they are dividing in vivo. When transplanted into chick embryos, the rat neural crest cells develop into neurons and glia, an indication of their stem cell-like properties [67]. However, the ability of rat E14.5 neural crest cells taken from sciatic nerve to generate nerve and glial cells in chick is more limited than neural crest cells derived from younger, E10.5 rat embryos. At the earlier stage of development, the neural tube has formed, but neural crest cells have not yet migrated to their final destinations. Neural crest cells from early developmental stages are more sensitive to bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) signaling, which may help explain their greater differentiation potential [106].

The notion that the bone marrow contains stem cells is not new. One population of bone marrow cells, the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), is responsible for forming all of the types of blood cells in the body. HSCs were recognized as a stem cells more than 40 years ago [9, 99]. Bone marrow stromal cellsa mixed cell population that generates bone, cartilage, fat, fibrous connective tissue, and the reticular network that supports blood cell formationwere described shortly after the discovery of HSCs [30, 32, 73]. The mesenchymal stem cells of the bone marrow also give rise to these tissues, and may constitute the same population of cells as the bone marrow stromal cells [78]. Recently, a population of progenitor cells that differentiates into endothelial cells, a type of cell that lines the blood vessels, was isolated from circulating blood [8] and identified as originating in bone marrow [89]. Whether these endothelial progenitor cells, which resemble the angioblasts that give rise to blood vessels during embryonic development, represent a bona fide population of adult bone marrow stem cells remains uncertain. Thus, the bone marrow appears to contain three stem cell populationshematopoietic stem cells, stromal cells, and (possibly) endothelial progenitor cells (see Figure 4.3. Hematopoietic and Stromal Stem Cell Differentiation).

Figure 4.3. Hematopoietic and Stromal Stem Cell Differentiation.

( 2001 Terese Winslow, Lydia Kibiuk)

Two more apparent stem cell types have been reported in circulating blood, but have not been shown to originate from the bone marrow. One population, called pericytes, may be closely related to bone marrow stromal cells, although their origin remains elusive [12]. The second population of blood-born stem cells, which occur in four species of animals testedguinea pigs, mice, rabbits, and humansresemble stromal cells in that they can generate bone and fat [53].

Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Of all the cell types in the body, those that survive for the shortest period of time are blood cells and certain kinds of epithelial cells. For example, red blood cells (erythrocytes), which lack a nucleus, live for approximately 120 days in the bloodstream. The life of an animal literally depends on the ability of these and other blood cells to be replenished continuously. This replenishment process occurs largely in the bone marrow, where HSCs reside, divide, and differentiate into all the blood cell types. Both HSCs and differentiated blood cells cycle from the bone marrow to the blood and back again, under the influence of a barrage of secreted factors that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration (see Chapter 5. Hematopoietic Stem Cells).

HSCs can reconstitute the hematopoietic system of mice that have been subjected to lethal doses of radiation to destroy their own hematopoietic systems. This test, the rescue of lethally irradiated mice, has become a standard by which other candidate stem cells are measured because it shows, without question, that HSCs can regenerate an entire tissue systemin this case, the blood [9, 99]. HSCs were first proven to be blood-forming stem cells in a series of experiments in mice; similar blood-forming stem cells occur in humans. HSCs are defined by their ability to self-renew and to give rise to all the kinds of blood cells in the body. This means that a single HSC is capable of regenerating the entire hematopoietic system, although this has been demonstrated only a few times in mice [72].

Over the years, many combinations of surface markers have been used to identify, isolate, and purify HSCs derived from bone marrow and blood. Undifferentiated HSCs and hematopoietic progenitor cells express c-kit, CD34, and H-2K. These cells usually lack the lineage marker Lin, or express it at very low levels (Lin-/low). And for transplant purposes, cells that are CD34+ Thy1+ Lin- are most likely to contain stem cells and result in engraftment.

Two kinds of HSCs have been defined. Long-term HSCs proliferate for the lifetime of an animal. In young adult mice, an estimated 8 to 10 % of long-term HSCs enter the cell cycle and divide each day. Short-term HSCs proliferate for a limited time, possibly a few months. Long-term HSCs have high levels of telomerase activity. Telomerase is an enzyme that helps maintain the length of the ends of chromosomes, called telomeres, by adding on nucleotides. Active telomerase is a characteristic of undifferentiated, dividing cells and cancer cells. Differentiated, human somatic cells do not show telomerase activity. In adult humans, HSCs occur in the bone marrow, blood, liver, and spleen, but are extremely rare in any of these tissues. In mice, only 1 in 10,000 to 15,000 bone marrow cells is a long-term HSC [105].

Short-term HSCs differentiate into lymphoid and myeloid precursors, the two classes of precursors for the two major lineages of blood cells. Lymphoid precursors differentiate into T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells. The mechanisms and pathways that lead to their differentiation are still being investigated [1, 2]. Myeloid precursors differentiate into monocytes and macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, megakaryocytes, and erythrocytes [3]. In vivo, bone marrow HSCs differentiate into mature, specialized blood cells that cycle constantly from the bone marrow to the blood, and back to the bone marrow [26]. A recent study showed that short-term HSCs are a heterogeneous population that differ significantly in terms of their ability to self-renew and repopulate the hematopoietic system [42].

Attempts to induce HSC to proliferate in vitroon many substrates, including those intended to mimic conditions in the stromahave frustrated scientists for many years. Although HSCs proliferate readily in vivo, they usually differentiate or die in vitro [26]. Thus, much of the research on HSCs has been focused on understanding the factors, cell-cell interactions, and cell-matrix interactions that control their proliferation and differentiation in vivo, with the hope that similar conditions could be replicated in vitro. Many of the soluble factors that regulate HSC differentiation in vivo are cytokines, which are made by different cell types and are then concentrated in the bone marrow by the extracellular matrix of stromal cellsthe sites of blood formation [45, 107]. Two of the most-studied cytokines are granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-3 (IL-3) [40, 81].

Also important to HSC proliferation and differentiation are interactions of the cells with adhesion molecules in the extracellular matrix of the bone marrow stroma [83, 101, 110].

Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. Bone marrow (BM) stromal cells have long been recognized for playing an important role in the differentiation of mature blood cells from HSCs (see Figure 4.3. Hematopoietic and Stromal Stem Cell Differentiation). But stromal cells also have other important functions [30, 31]. In addition to providing the physical environment in which HSCs differentiate, BM stromal cells generate cartilage, bone, and fat. Whether stromal cells are best classified as stem cells or progenitor cells for these tissues is still in question. There is also a question as to whether BM stromal cells and so-called mesenchymal stem cells are the same population [78].

BM stromal cells have many features that distinguish them from HSCs. The two cell types are easy to separate in vitro. When bone marrow is dissociated, and the mixture of cells it contains is plated at low density, the stromal cells adhere to the surface of the culture dish, and the HSCs do not. Given specific in vitro conditions, BM stromal cells form colonies from a single cell called the colony forming unit-F (CFU-F). These colonies may then differentiate as adipocytes or myelosupportive stroma, a clonal assay that indicates the stem cell-like nature of stromal cells. Unlike HSCs, which do not divide in vitro (or proliferate only to a limited extent), BM stromal cells can proliferate for up to 35 population doublings in vitro [16]. They grow rapidly under the influence of such mitogens as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) [12].

To date, it has not been possible to isolate a population of pure stromal cells from bone marrow. Panels of markers used to identify the cells include receptors for certain cytokines (interleukin-1, 3, 4, 6, and 7) receptors for proteins in the extracellular matrix, (ICAM-1 and 2, VCAM-1, the alpha-1, 2, and 3 integrins, and the beta-1, 2, 3 and 4 integrins), etc. [64]. Despite the use of these markers and another stromal cell marker called Stro-1, the origin and specific identity of stromal cells have remained elusive. Like HSCs, BM stromal cells arise from embryonic mesoderm during development, although no specific precursor or stem cell for stromal cells has been isolated and identified. One theory about their origin is that a common kind of progenitor cellperhaps a primordial endothelial cell that lines embryonic blood vesselsgives rise to both HSCs and to mesodermal precursors. The latter may then differentiate into myogenic precursors (the satellite cells that are thought to function as stem cells in skeletal muscle), and the BM stromal cells [10].

In vivo, the differentiation of stromal cells into fat and bone is not straightforward. Bone marrow adipocytes and myelosupportive stromal cellsboth of which are derived from BM stromal cellsmay be regarded as interchangeable phenotypes [10, 11]. Adipocytes do not develop until postnatal life, as the bones enlarge and the marrow space increases to accommodate enhanced hematopoiesis. When the skeleton stops growing, and the mass of HSCs decreases in a normal, age-dependent fashion, BM stromal cells differentiate into adipocytes, which fill the extra space. New bone formation is obviously greater during skeletal growth, although bone "turns over" throughout life. Bone forming cells are osteoblasts, but their relationship to BM stromal cells is not clear. New trabecular bone, which is the inner region of bone next to the marrow, could logically develop from the action of BM stromal cells. But the outside surface of bone also turns over, as does bone next to the Haversian system (small canals that form concentric rings within bone). And neither of these surfaces is in contact with BM stromal cells [10, 11].

It is often difficultif not impossibleto distinguish adult, tissue-specific stem cells from progenitor cells. With that caveat in mind, the following summary identifies reports of stem cells in various adult tissues.

Endothelial Progenitor Cells. Endothelial cells line the inner surfaces of blood vessels throughout the body, and it has been difficult to identify specific endothelial stem cells in either the embryonic or the adult mammal. During embryonic development, just after gastrulation, a kind of cell called the hemangioblast, which is derived from mesoderm, is presumed to be the precursor of both the hematopoietic and endothelial cell lineages. The embryonic vasculature formed at this stage is transient and consists of blood islands in the yolk sac. But hemangioblasts, per se, have not been isolated from the embryo and their existence remains in question. The process of forming new blood vessels in the embryo is called vasculogenesis. In the adult, the process of forming blood vessels from pre-existing blood vessels is called angiogenesis [50].

Evidence that hemangioblasts do exist comes from studies of mouse embryonic stem cells that are directed to differentiate in vitro. These studies have shown that a precursor cell derived from mouse ES cells that express Flk-1 [the receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in mice] can give rise to both blood cells and blood vessel cells [88, 109]. Both VEGF and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) play critical roles in endothelial cell differentiation in vivo [79].

Several recent reports indicate that the bone marrow contains cells that can give rise to new blood vessels in tissues that are ischemic (damaged due to the deprivation of blood and oxygen) [8, 29, 49, 94]. But it is unclear from these studies what cell type(s) in the bone marrow induced angiogenesis. In a study which sought to address that question, researchers found that adult human bone marrow contains cells that resemble embryonic hemangioblasts, and may therefore be called endothelial stem cells.

In more recent experiments, human bone marrow-derived cells were injected into the tail veins of rats with induced cardiac ischemia. The human cells migrated to the rat heart where they generated new blood vessels in the infarcted muscle (a process akin to vasculogenesis), and also induced angiogenesis. The candidate endothelial stem cells are CD34+(a marker for HSCs), and they express the transcription factor GATA-2 [51]. A similar study using transgenic mice that express the gene for enhanced green fluorescent protein (which allows the cells to be tracked), showed that bone-marrow-derived cells could repopulate an area of infarcted heart muscle in mice, and generate not only blood vessels, but also cardiomyocytes that integrated into the host tissue [71] (see Chapter 9. Can Stem Cells Repair a Damaged Heart?).

And, in a series of experiments in adult mammals, progenitor endothelial cells were isolated from peripheral blood (of mice and humans) by using antibodies against CD34 and Flk-1, the receptor for VEGF. The cells were mononuclear blood cells (meaning they have a nucleus) and are referred to as MBCD34+ cells and MBFlk1+ cells. When plated in tissue-culture dishes, the cells attached to the substrate, became spindle-shaped, and formed tube-like structures that resemble blood vessels. When transplanted into mice of the same species (autologous transplants) with induced ischemia in one limb, the MBCD34+ cells promoted the formation of new blood vessels [8]. Although the adult MBCD34+ and MBFlk1+ cells function in some ways like stem cells, they are usually regarded as progenitor cells.

Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells. Skeletal muscle, like the cardiac muscle of the heart and the smooth muscle in the walls of blood vessels, the digestive system, and the respiratory system, is derived from embryonic mesoderm. To date, at least three populations of skeletal muscle stem cells have been identified: satellite cells, cells in the wall of the dorsal aorta, and so-called "side population" cells.

Satellite cells in skeletal muscle were identified 40 years ago in frogs by electron microscopy [62], and thereafter in mammals [84]. Satellite cells occur on the surface of the basal lamina of a mature muscle cell, or myofiber. In adult mammals, satellite cells mediate muscle growth [85]. Although satellite cells are normally non-dividing, they can be triggered to proliferate as a result of injury, or weight-bearing exercise. Under either of these circumstances, muscle satellite cells give rise to myogenic precursor cells, which then differentiate into the myofibrils that typify skeletal muscle. A group of transcription factors called myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) play important roles in these differentiation events. The so-called primary MRFs, MyoD and Myf5, help regulate myoblast formation during embryogenesis. The secondary MRFs, myogenin and MRF4, regulate the terminal differentiation of myofibrils [86].

With regard to satellite cells, scientists have been addressing two questions. Are skeletal muscle satellite cells true adult stem cells or are they instead precursor cells? Are satellite cells the only cell type that can regenerate skeletal muscle. For example, a recent report indicates that muscle stem cells may also occur in the dorsal aorta of mouse embryos, and constitute a cell type that gives rise both to muscle satellite cells and endothelial cells. Whether the dorsal aorta cells meet the criteria of a self-renewing muscle stem cell is a matter of debate [21].

Another report indicates that a different kind of stem cell, called an SP cell, can also regenerate skeletal muscle may be present in muscle and bone marrow. SP stands for a side population of cells that can be separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. Intravenously injecting these muscle-derived stem cells restored the expression of dystrophin in mdx mice. Dystrophin is the protein that is defective in people with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy; mdx mice provide a model for the human disease. Dystrophin expression in the SP cell-treated mice was lower than would be needed for clinical benefit. Injection of bone marrow- or muscle-derived SP cells into the dystrophic muscle of the mice yielded equivocal results that the transplanted cells had integrated into the host tissue. The authors conclude that a similar population of SP stem cells can be derived from either adult mouse bone marrow or skeletal muscle, and suggest "there may be some direct relationship between bone marrow-derived stem cells and other tissue- or organ-specific cells" [43]. Thus, stem cell or progenitor cell types from various mesodermally-derived tissues may be able to generate skeletal muscle.

Epithelial Cell Precursors in the Skin and Digestive System. Epithelial cells, which constitute 60 percent of the differentiated cells in the body are responsible for covering the internal and external surfaces of the body, including the lining of vessels and other cavities. The epithelial cells in skin and the digestive tract are replaced constantly. Other epithelial cell populationsin the ducts of the liver or pancreas, for exampleturn over more slowly. The cell population that renews the epithelium of the small intestine occurs in the intestinal crypts, deep invaginations in the lining of the gut. The crypt cells are often regarded as stem cells; one of them can give rise to an organized cluster of cells called a structural-proliferative unit [93].

The skin of mammals contains at least three populations of epithelial cells: epidermal cells, hair follicle cells, and glandular epithelial cells, such as those that make up the sweat glands. The replacement patterns for epithelial cells in these three compartments differ, and in all the compartments, a stem cell population has been postulated. For example, stem cells in the bulge region of the hair follicle appear to give rise to multiple cell types. Their progeny can migrate down to the base of the follicle where they become matrix cells, which may then give rise to different cell types in the hair follicle, of which there are seven [39]. The bulge stem cells of the follicle may also give rise to the epidermis of the skin [95].

Another population of stem cells in skin occurs in the basal layer of the epidermis. These stem cells proliferate in the basal region, and then differentiate as they move toward the outer surface of the skin. The keratinocytes in the outermost layer lack nuclei and act as a protective barrier. A dividing skin stem cell can divide asymmetrically to produce two kinds of daughter cells. One is another self-renewing stem cell. The second kind of daughter cell is an intermediate precursor cell which is then committed to replicate a few times before differentiating into keratinocytes. Self-renewing stem cells can be distinguished from this intermediate precusor cell by their higher level of 1 integrin expression, which signals keratinocytes to proliferate via a mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase [112]. Other signaling pathways include that triggered by -catenin, which helps maintain the stem-cell state [111], and the pathway regulated by the oncoprotein c-Myc, which triggers stem cells to give rise to transit amplifying cells [36].

Stem Cells in the Pancreas and Liver. The status of stem cells in the adult pancreas and liver is unclear. During embryonic development, both tissues arise from endoderm. A recent study indicates that a single precursor cell derived from embryonic endoderm may generate both the ventral pancreas and the liver [23]. In adult mammals, however, both the pancreas and the liver contain multiple kinds of differentiated cells that may be repopulated or regenerated by multiple types of stem cells. In the pancreas, endocrine (hormone-producing) cells occur in the islets of Langerhans. They include the beta cells (which produce insulin), the alpha cells (which secrete glucagon), and cells that release the peptide hormones somatostatin and pancreatic polypeptide. Stem cells in the adult pancreas are postulated to occur in the pancreatic ducts or in the islets themselves. Several recent reports indicate that stem cells that express nestinwhich is usually regarded as a marker of neural stem cellscan generate all of the cell types in the islets [60, 113] (see Chapter 7. Stem Cells and Diabetes).

The identity of stem cells that can repopulate the liver of adult mammals is also in question. Recent studies in rodents indicate that HSCs (derived from mesoderm) may be able to home to liver after it is damaged, and demonstrate plasticity in becoming into hepatocytes (usually derived from endoderm) [54, 77, 97]. But the question remains as to whether cells from the bone marrow normally generate hepatocytes in vivo. It is not known whether this kind of plasticity occurs without severe damage to the liver or whether HSCs from the bone marrow generate oval cells of the liver [18]. Although hepatic oval cells exist in the liver, it is not clear whether they actually generate new hepatocytes [87, 98]. Oval cells may arise from the portal tracts in liver and may give rise to either hepatocytes [19, 55] and to the epithelium of the bile ducts [37, 92]. Indeed, hepatocytes themselves, may be responsible for the well-know regenerative capacity of liver.

Chapter 3|Table of Contents|Chapter 5

Historical content: June 17, 2001

View post:
4. The Adult Stem Cell | stemcells.nih.gov

Read More...

Page 16«..10..15161718..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick