header logo image


Page 9«..891011..20..»

Archive for the ‘Stem Cell Complications’ Category

Porsche Just Unveiled the Eighth Generation 911 Targa – Yahoo Lifestyle

Monday, May 18th, 2020

Click here to read the full article.

The eight-generation Porsche 911 may be 18 months old, but theres still plenty of reasons to get excited about the latest iteration of the iconic sports car. And now theres another, as the German marque has just revealed the cars eagerly anticipated Targa variants.

On Monday, Porsche debuted the incredibly stylish 992-generation Targa 4 and 4S models in a special virtual world premiere. And while news of the upcoming release of the open-top vehicles would be enough fodder more most auto enthusiasts, the marque had a surprise up its sleeve: the high-performance version of the Targa will be available with a seven-speed manual transmission at no extra charge.

More from Robb Report

First introduced in 1967, the chic Targa differentiates itself from other open-top 911s thanks to retractable roof and a full-width roll bar that sits behind the driver and passenger seats. The roof, which can be opened and closed in just 19 seconds, is made up of two magnesium segments and features sound-deadening material within its fabric, according to a press release. Meanwhile, the roll bar is similar to the one featured on the last generation of the Targa, though its been upgraded to meet the needs of the new model.

Both versions of the variant are powered by a twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter flat-six engine. In the Targa 4, this is good for 379 horsepower and 331 lb-ft of torque, while the 4Ss motor churns out an even more impressive 443 hp and 390 lb-ft of twist. (The difference between the two models specs mirrors that of the the 911 Carrera and Carrera S).This engine is mated the brands PDK dual-clutch transmission, though, and S owners can opt for the seven-speed manual if they prefer. That makes the 4S just the third 992 model to be made available with a stick shift.

Porsche didnt reveal an exact release date for the 2021 Targas, but both models are expected to go on sale in the US later this year. The standard starts at $120,650, while the high-performance version can be had for $136,550.

Best of Robb Report

Sign up for Robb Report's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

See more here:
Porsche Just Unveiled the Eighth Generation 911 Targa - Yahoo Lifestyle

Read More...

Stonehenge’s Summer Solstice Event Will Be Live Streamed For the First Time Ever – Yahoo Lifestyle

Monday, May 18th, 2020

From House Beautiful

Every year, thousands of visitors flock to Wiltshire, England, and camp out overnight for Stonehenge's annual summer solstice event which celebrates the official start of summer. However, this year's summer solstice, slated to begin at sunset on June 20, 2020 and conclude a little bit after sunrise on June 21, 2020 has been canceled due to COVID-19. While this news might come as a disappointment to many, Stonehenge isn't letting the longest day of the year go unnoticed. For the first time ever, Stonehenge will be live streaming its entire event.

"We hope that our live stream offers an alternative opportunity for people near and far to connect with this spiritual place at such a special time of year and we look forward to welcoming everyone back next year, Stonehenge director Nichola Tasker told the Salisbury Journal. While many fans of the event are heartbroken over its cancellation (including Tasker herself) she advises "please do not travel to Stonehenge this summer solstice, but watch it online instead.

Interested? Stonehenge has already created the official Facebook event here, where you'll also be able to watch the live stream the day of. According to the event's description, the live stream will start at least 30 minutes prior to Saturdays sunset on June 20th, which will approximately take place at 21:26 BST (20:26 GMT). It will go until Sunday's sunrise on June 21st at approximately 04:52 BST (03:52 GMT). The best part about this livestream is that if you miss the event (aka fall asleep), youll be able to watch it later as the live stream will be saved as a video. Thats one benefit to a digital solstice event, right?

Stay tuned, guys! An official schedule will be released soon with more events.

Follow House Beautiful on Instagram.

You Might Also Like

See more here:
Stonehenge's Summer Solstice Event Will Be Live Streamed For the First Time Ever - Yahoo Lifestyle

Read More...

FDA Approves Tabrecta, the First Targeted Drug for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and MET exon 14 – Curetoday.com

Sunday, May 10th, 2020

Tabrecta (capmatinib) will treat patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer that has a mutation leading to MET exon 14 skipping. The drug is the first targeted option for patients with lung cancer and this type of mutation.

Tabrecta is the first therapy approved by the FDA specifically to treat NSCLC with mutations that lead to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is MET exon 14 skipping.

Tabrecta is approved for patients who are new to treatment and also those who have received previous therapies, regardless of prior treatment type.

Along with the drug approval, the FDA gave the green light to a companion diagnostic, the FoundationOne CDx assay, which can identify these mutations in patients.

In epithelialmesenchymal transition(EMT), the cells that line an organ lose their polarity and ability to adhere to other cells, giving them the ability to invade tissues and organs. MET exon 14 skipping means that a segment of RNA that should prompt the production of a specific protein stops sending those messages.

The spread of cancer consists of a sequential series of events and MET exon 14 skipping is recognized as a critical event in this process, the FDA stated in a press release about the approval. Mutations leading to MET exon 14 skipping are found in 3% to 4% of patients with lung cancer, the agency stated.

Lung cancer is increasingly being divided into multiple subsets of molecularly defined populations with drugs being developed to target these specific groups, said Dr. Richard Pazdur, director of the FDAs Oncology Center of Excellence and acting director of the Office of Oncologic Diseases in the FDAs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, in the release.

Taken orally, Tabrecta works by blocking a key protein that drives metastatic NSCLC in these patients. The FDA approved it based on the results of a clinical trial involving patients with NSCLC who had mutations leading to MET exon 14 skipping; their tumors did not express the proteins EGFR or ALK.

The evaluated study population included 28 patients who had never undergone treatment for NSCLC and 69 previously treated patients. The overall response rate (ORR; the percentage of participants who experienced a prespecified amount of tumor shrinkage) for the 28 participants was 68%, with 4% having a complete response and 64% having a partial response.

The ORR for the 69 participants was 41%, with all having a partial response. Of the responding participants who had never undergone treatment for NSCLC, 47% had a duration of response lasting 12 months or longer compared with 32.1% of the responding participants who had been previously treated.

Common side effects for patients taking Tabrecta included swelling of the legs, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, shortness of breath and decreased appetite.

Tabrecta may cause serious side effects including scarring or inflammation of the lungs. It may also cause damage to liver cells or harm a developing fetus or newborn baby. Patients may be more sensitive to sunlight when they take Tabrecta and should take precautions to cover their skin and use sunscreen.

Tabrecta was approved under theFDAs accelerated approval, breakthrough designation and priority review programs, which provide for a quicker review of drugs that treat serious or life-threatening diseases and represent a meaningful advantage over existing treatments.

Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification of these results in confirmatory clinical trials.

Check back for what you need to know regarding this approval.

See original here:
FDA Approves Tabrecta, the First Targeted Drug for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and MET exon 14 - Curetoday.com

Read More...

San Diego biotech firm seeks approval for stem cell research against COVID-19 – CBS News 8

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

Personalized Stem Cells Incorporated (PSC) in Poway said the therapy could reduce the most serious complications of the infection in the lungs.

SAN DIEGO A San Diego biotech company is seeking emergency FDA approval for an experimental trial of stem cell therapy for coronavirus patients.

Personalized Stem Cells Incorporated (PSC) in Poway said the therapy could reduce the most serious complications of the infection in the lungs.

PSC CEO, Dr. Bob Harman, said the company is asking to test the treatment on a group of 20 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the first phase of a clinical trial.

"Stem cell doses will be ready for clinical trial use in May, depending on FDA approval," Harman said.

Harman said they've already scaled up production of stem cells in anticipation of FDA approval.

PSC Medical Director, Dr. Christopher Rogers, stated, "I believe this is the most promising therapy being explored by medical scientists at this time and stem cells may potentially reduce the most serious complications of coronavirus infection."

The FDA has a new program called the Coronavirus Therapeutic Accelerator Program (CTAP) to help speed up the launch of FDA clinical trials for hopeful COVID-19 therapies.

PSC was asked by the White House Coronavirus Task Force to apply to the FDA CTAP program for expedited review of their application.

PSC hopes to rapidly complete the CoronaStem 1 study and then proceed into a larger Phase 2 clinical trial and potentially into FDA compassionate use programs to reach more patients.

More information can be found on the PSC website.

See more here:
San Diego biotech firm seeks approval for stem cell research against COVID-19 - CBS News 8

Read More...

Outcomes of Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transformed Fanconi Anemia – Hematology Advisor

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

Patientswith newly diagnosed transformed Fanconi anemia (FA) have poor outcomes andshould achieve complete remission (CR) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stemcell transplantation (alloHSCT), according to results from a study published inthe American Journal of Hematology.

Stefano Giardino, MD, of the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation unit at the Istituto Giannina Gaslini in Italy, and colleagues retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 74 patients with transformed FA (36 male; median age, 14 years); 35 patients had myelodysplastic syndrome, 35 had acute leukemia, and 4 patients had high-risk cytogenetic abnormality. All patients underwent alloHSCT from 1999 to 2016.

The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute graft-vs-host disease (AGVHD) and chronic graft-vs-host disease (CGVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and incidence of relapse. To identify potential factors that may influence outcomes, the researchers assessed the type of diagnosis, preHSCT cytoreductive therapies and related toxicities, disease status prior to HSCT, donor type, and conditioning regimen.

Ata median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year OS and EFS were 42% and 39%,respectively; 5-year cumulative incidence relapse and NRM rates were 21% and40%, respectively. Patients in CR during transplant had better OS than those whostill had active disease (OS, 71% vs 37%, respectively; P =.04). No other factors had a significant effecton patient outcomes.

Of22 patients who received cytoreductive therapy prior to HSCT, 40.9% experienceda grade 3 to grade 4 toxicity event; this did not appear to effect survivalafter HSCT (3 year OS, toxicity preHSCT 48% vs no toxicity 51%; P =.98).At 100 days, the cumulative incidence of grade 2 to 4 AGVHD was 38%, and the cumulativeincidence of 5-year CGVHD was 40%.

At5 years, NRM was 40%, while incidence of relapse was 21%. Transplant-relatedevents were the cause of mortality in 81% of patients (34 of 42 deaths).

Limitationsof the study included the retrospective design and incomplete data for somevariables. The authors highlighted the large number of patients for this raredisorder as the primary strength.

Inorder to optimize the chances of the only curative option for FA in malignanttransformation, a sequential cytoreductive therapy followed by HSCT appears areasonable approach in FA patients with AL, if a previously identified donor israpidly available, wrote the authors. However, since the risk oftreatment-related complications is high, these patients should be managed inhighly specialized centers and transplant approaches aimed at reducing theoccurrence of [GVHD] and transplant-related complications should be prioritized.

Reference

Giardino S, Latour RP, Aljurf M, et al. Outcome of patients with Fanconi anemia developing myelodysplasia and acute leukemia who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis on behalf of EBMT group [published online April 8, 2020]. Am J Hematol. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25810

Read this article:
Outcomes of Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transformed Fanconi Anemia - Hematology Advisor

Read More...

Exclusive Interview with Renowned Coronavirus Researcher Dr. Camillo Ricordi – The Jewish Voice

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

by Lieba Nesis

Having the opportunity to speak with Dr. Camillo Ricordi, one of the foremost experts on stem cell research, was nothing short of extraordinary. The 63-year-old scientist is director of the Diabetes Research Institute at the University of Miami. While his specialty is pancreatic islet transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes, when coronavirus came calling he sprung into action. Since January he has been working 16 hours a day 7 days a week to help his colleagues in China, Italy and the US battle the deadly affliction. He is now conducting a clinical trial with 24 patients to test the efficacy of stem cells in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The cells which are injected directly into the lung hone in on the injury and inflammation producing an army of 200 million cells to fight the complications of the illness. Here are excerpts of my conversation with this heroic doctor who is on the front lines of this drudgerous battle.

I began by asking Ricordi if he was caught unawares by the virus: to which he responded there were simulations and warnings from individuals such as Bill Gates since 2014. However, he acknowledged until you get hit you dont think its real. Ricordi believes the virus emanated from a Wuhan lab which the NY Post and Newsweek claim was financially backed by the NIH, the CDC and the WHO, with Dr. Fauci contributing $7.4 million to the Wuhan Virology Lab. Ricordi cited the position of 200 scientists who had expressed concern of potentiating virus research in bats due to the possibility of a catastrophic leak. Ricordi is in agreement with Nobel Prize Winner Luc Montagniers assertion that the virus was engineered by inserting genes from HIV into the coronavirus in a misfired bid to find an AIDS vaccine. The bat which has a high number and rate of virus mutations was the perfect medium for creating a marginally lethal, yet highly contagious disease. With the viruses high level of changeability Ricordi was dubious as to whether the precise source of origination would ever be discovered. He also expressed concern as to the efficacy of a vaccine, since it might protect against COVID-19 but be ineffectual when a different strain called COVID-20 and 21 appeared.

One of the tricks to fighting this disease is building a strong immune system through an anti-inflammatory diet and supplements such as Vitamin C, D, Omega 3, Zinc and Resveratrol, according to Ricordi. While he is optimistic the disease will diminish during the summer months, he is equally confident a second and stronger wave will hit in the winter if lockdown procedures are relaxed-akin to what has occurred in Japan where a second state of emergency was declared on April 6th. Ricordi mentioned that China destroyed a paper proving the virus was engineered replacing it with documentation confirming natural origin leading him to conclude the disease was in fact manipulated. Ricordi is of the opinion that a cocktail will eventually be used to successfully treat the disease. Remdesivir and Hydroxychloroquine, he conceded, show immense promise if used in correct dosages and at the incipient stages of the illness before the patient becomes critically ill.

Ricordi is the most often quoted expert on stem cell research where he has successfully prevented the acceleration of aging as well as kidney and eye disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes. He has currently diverted a number of resources from diabetes to the study of COVID-19 where he has injected his 4th critically ill COVID patient with stem cells in a double blind study-the results of which will be ready in two months. The cells which were retrieved from the placenta of a baby can be used to treat more than 10,000 patients. The injections are administered intravenously with the natural first filter being the targeted area of the lungs (unlike in diabetes where a catheter has to be inserted to ensure cell transmission to the pancreas) The FDA approved his trial in a record weeks time and the 24 critically ill patients who receive the cells should see effects in weeks. Ricordis optimism is backed by science since colleagues in Israel reported zero deaths after using stem cells in 6 critically ill coronavirus patients. China had similarly favorable outcomes with no deaths in 80 seriously ill patients. Furthermore, injecting the cells is a benign procedure that takes only 10 to 15 minutes to perform. Unlike other treatments, the availability of cells abound with more than 3.8 million births in the US last year providing viable placentas. Moreover, the benefits of building a large scale emergency response repository in the form of cell banks to treat Alzheimers, severe lung damage, diabetes, and kidney disease in between pandemics would be revolutionary.

Stem cells have not been heretofore utilized due to the FDAs stringent safety requirements. Furthermore, there are significant costs associated with clinical trials where environmental sterility and quality control are carefully monitored. Ricordi raised funds from private individuals-90 percent of whom were of Italian descent. In his next larger trial he will be addressing how to stop progression of the disease in less severe cases. Ricordi stressed the importance of wearing masks and socially distancing due to the viruses airborne nature; noting that contained spaces such as cruise ships, planes, hospitals and nursing homes were especially problematic. Ricordi is currently meeting with architects to discuss how to construct pandemic resistant buildings which use ultraviolet lights in bathrooms and avoid recycled air. Our entire future will be reinvented said Ricordi, as telemedicine and home monitoring of patients will soon become commonplace. He also predicted there will be future pandemics as the distance between animals and humans continues to narrow with monkeys and bats encroaching on human habitats and vice versa-due to limited space. Moreover, Ricordi remarked bioweapons and vaccines were a disaster waiting to happen. As Ricordi rushed to attend a pivotal meeting he casually mentioned his daughter was working as an ICU nurse in California-another reason this heroic warrior felt such an urgent calling to discover an imminent cure.

Link:
Exclusive Interview with Renowned Coronavirus Researcher Dr. Camillo Ricordi - The Jewish Voice

Read More...

The disease that wastes away boys’ muscles – The Standard

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

Fifteen years ago, Scholar Muthamia was getting ready to welcome her second child. The pregnancy had no complications at all and when her son Ferdinand Mutugi Njuguna was born, he weighed a healthy 3.9 kg.Mutugi was as precocious a toddler as can be, and all was fine in the Njuguna household until the boy developed a peculiar walking style.He would push his left foot ahead while walking and he didnt seem to quite stand up straight, Muthamia says.We thought it was a unique walking style he had developed, and let him be. And weirdly, when wearing a pair of shorts or trousers, he would pull them up with his arms while walking and many assumed we were buying him over-sized clothes, she says.Later, Ferdinand began falling while walking. He also started having a hard time standing up from a sitting position. Climbing stairs became a hardship and he couldnt run as fast as he used to.He would get tired very fast and even started walking on his toes. We took him to various hospitals and eventually ended up at Kenyatta National Hospital where he was diagnosed with Duchenne muscular dystrophy,she says.

For More of This and Other Stories, Grab Your Copy of the Standard Newspaper. Read Now

Do not miss out on the latest news. Join the Standard Digital Telegram channel HERE.

View post:
The disease that wastes away boys' muscles - The Standard

Read More...

Chronic Health Conditions, Not Transplant Receipt, Linked to Symptom Prevalence in Survivors of Childhood Hematologic Malignancies – Clinical Advisor

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

Poor patient-reported outcomes insurvivors of childhood hematologic malignancies are associated with thepresence of chronic health conditions, regardless of whether patients had receivedhematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or conventional therapy,according to a study published in Blood.

Investigators compared symptomprevalence, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and risk factors in adultsurvivors. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, these patient-reportedoutcomes were compared with results of surveys and medical assessments given tomembers of a noncancer control group (242 patients). Survivors of hematologicmalignancies were organized by treatment type to either HSCT group (112patients) or conventional treatment group (1106 patients).

Compared with individuals in the noncancer group, survivors who had received HSCT reported substantially higher rates of symptom prevalence across memory (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.8), sensation (aOR, 4.7), pulmonary (aOR, 4.6), and motor/movement domains (aOR, 4.3). Physical HRQoL was also significantly worse for survivors who received HSCT, compared with patients who did not have cancer (aOR, 6.9).

The investigators found nosignificant difference between survivors from each treatment group in terms ofHRQoL and symptom prevalence by domain. Organ-specific chronic healthconditions were a greater indicator of the prevalence of most symptom domainsthan treatment type.

Some ocular symptoms showed higher cumulative prevalence among those who received HSCT compared with conventional treatment. These related to eye dryness (P <.0001), difficulty seeing while aided by glasses (P <.0001), and double vision (P =.04).

The goal of cancersurvivorship care is not merely to identify and manage medical complications,but also to improve daily functional status and HRQOL, the investigators wrote.

The researchers also indicatedthat clinicians should consider proactively screening survivors of pediatrichematologic malignancies, particularly those treated with HSCT who have chronichealth conditions, for symptoms phenotypes to aid in the early identificationof adverse events.

Reference

Yen HJ, Eissa H, Bhatt NS, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in survivors of childhood hematologic malignancies with hematopoietic stem cell transplant [published online April 2, 2020]. Blood. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003858

This article originally appeared on Hematology Advisor

Original post:
Chronic Health Conditions, Not Transplant Receipt, Linked to Symptom Prevalence in Survivors of Childhood Hematologic Malignancies - Clinical Advisor

Read More...

Tributes paid as much-loved and inspirational driving instructor dies – Warrington Guardian

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

A POPULAR driving instructor who taught hundreds of Warrington students has sadly died following a year-long illness.

Sara Ashbrook, from Latchford was diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in February last year.

After needing a stem cell transplant, Sara matched with a 21-year-old donor in the Netherlands and underwent the operation in September.

The 48-year-old mum got through the most important 100 days after the transplant, meaning it was a success.

Unfortunately, one of the drugs that Sara took to help the transplant caused her cholesterol to sky-rocket and she developed pancreatitis in January.

Sara and her husband Ste

Sara was admitted to the intensive care unit at the The Royal Liverpool University Hospital and further complications meant she was placed in a coma.

Her daughter Zoe, said: "My mum was a big music fan, she always had the radio on no matter where she was.

"She had Radio 1 with Chris Moyles on in the kitchen every morning and then in the car she would have it so loud.

"She would sing to her favourites from 80s Bananarama to the Arctic Monkeys.

"Mum and her friend would dance like maniacs in the living room to Scooter's Jumping All Over the World or with me to Rihanna's Pon de Replay.

"Mum was a kind-hearted, generous and thoughtful person.

"She encouraged us three children to think of others and was a great role model; giving blood on a regular basis, raising money for cancer research and other charities or simply donating to charity shops.

"Even when she was suffering in pain she would sit down and talk to the nurses about their day and let them vent.

"She would take them sweets, chocolate and cakes to cheer them up.

"Not long after she came out of her coma she asked me to buy some sweets for the nurses."

Sara slowly started to get better and signs of her 'amazing' personality started to show.

She was slowly weaned off the ventilator and spent time on a voice box.

Sara eventually came off ventilation but at this stage, her body started fighting numerous infections, including sepsis, which put more strain on her breathing.

This meant Sara had to be put back on ventilation and became very unwell.

Sara sadly passed away on Saturday, April 11 at 3.40pm surrounded by her family.

She is survived by her husband Ste, three children Zoe, Declan and Connor, two stepchildren, four grandchildren, her siblings and parents.

Zoe added: "Mum seemed to rise above her pain and suffering and was always putting others before her no matter what she was going through.

"She touched so many lives over the years. Everyone thought so much more of her, she became a friend to everyone she met.

"She always has been and always will be my number one inspiration."

Her family is now fundraising to help towards the fight against Leukaemia and contribute towards the University of Liverpool's Pancreatic Cancer Fund.

You can donate here http://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/remembersara

Here is the original post:
Tributes paid as much-loved and inspirational driving instructor dies - Warrington Guardian

Read More...

How GP practices should support shielded patients during the COVID-19 outbreak – GP online

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

Patients who are most at risk of severe complications from COVID-19 have been asked to 'shield' themselves. This means that they should stay at home and avoid face-to-face contact with anyone from outside of their household. Members of their household are advised to stringently follow social distancing rules.

The following patients were on the CMO's original list of high-risk patients:

The following groups have since been added to the list:

* During a webinar on Thursday 23 April, NHS England primary care medical director Dr Nikki Kanani said that patients who have had a splenectomy had also been added to the list and had been sent letters. However, this has not been updated on official guidance. She also asked practices to check to make sure that these patients had been added to the list.

**An RCGP learning module on shielded patients has also been updated to advise the patients with interstitial lung disease, some with bronchiectasis and those with pulmonary hypertension should also be included in the group. It adds: 'These patients will be identified and contacted by secondary care, but you may receive queries from them in primary care.'

#A primary care bulletin on 27 April confirmed that renal dialysis patients have been added to the shielded list. Renal units will contact patients and send them a letter.

Around 900,000 patients were identified via hospital data at the end of March and received a letter advising them to shield. Flags should have been added to GP systems to identify these people. A second phase identified a further 400,000 patients using primary care data and letters and texts started being sent to this group on 7 April.

Practices should have received advice on how to run a system search for a report containing this list of patients from their system suppliers. Current search guidance for each system provider can be found in the annex to this letter to practices.

If GPs considered there were patients on the register who should not be included, they were advised to code them low/medium risk vulnerability system suppliers should have advised the practice of which code to use. The original code will remain in the record, but any reports run will use the most-recently added code.

If these patients were on the initial central list they may have already received a letter advising them to 'shield'. Therefore practices may need to contact these patients to discuss their circumstances.

There has been some confusion about adding further patients to this list because practices were initially asked to identify additional people using guidance produced by NHS England, the BMA and the RCGP, which suggested the patient groups this could cover. NHS England later told practices to distragard this.

GPs and consultants will also be able to add additional patients to the shielding group throughout the pandemic by using appropriate codes. Any patient identified by the practice should have been sent a letter (template letters are here). Patients identified in secondary care should receive a letter from their hospital doctor, who should also inform the practice that they have identified this patient.

If GPs don't agree that a patient identified as 'high risk' by the hospital falls into this category they should discuss it with the trust. If different opinions still exist the patient should remain in the highest risk category.

Patients have also been asked to self-identify via the government website and practices should receive a list of these patients from their system supplier between 17 and 24 April. The guidance says the list of patients who will need adding to the high-risk list is likely to be very small given the review practices will have already completed.

Practices should review this new list by 28 April and determine which patients should be flagged as high, medium or low risk. For those flagged as high risk the practice will need to send them a shielding letter.

If patients not included on the register want to follow shielding advice that is there own choice. However the latest guidance says that those not on the register, but in the broader group of patients at risk (which is effectively the groups entitled to a free flu jab), should be advised to follow social distancing.

NHS Digital will pull details of the patient records that are flagged every week. This means that these people will be able to access the government's shielding support for food and medicines delivery although support is initially focused on people who have no other means of getting food and medicine. The guidance says that there may be a lag in processing this information and, if so, patients requiring urgent help should contact their local authority.

Patients are also required to register for this support here: https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus-extremely-vulnerable If someone does not have access to the internet, refer them to the phone line in the letter.

The NHS is also providing further support to patients at risk via the Goodsam App and NHS Volunteer Responders. Any health professional or local authority can refer people who require assistance. Referrals can be made via the NHS Volunteer Responders portal here https://goodsamapp.org/NHSreferral or by calling 0808 196 3382. This support is available to anyone in need and not just the highest-risk group.

A letter from NHS chief executive Sir Simon Stevens set out the steps practices should take in the second phase of the pandemic. Practices were told that patients who are shielding should be proactively contacted to'ensure they know how toaccess care, are receiving their medications', and practices should provide home visitingwhere clinically necessary.

During a webinar on 23 April, Dr Nikki Kanani said that practices should be contacting these patients to check that they understand what is happening. A presentation during the webinar suggested that these conversations should:

NHS England is setting up an expert group that will be chaired by deputry primary care medical director Dr Raj Patel, and involve input from the RCGP, to consider what healthcare support should be provided to patients who are shielding in the coming months.

According to the latest standard operating procedure (dated 6 April), practices should:

The standard operating procedure advises that these patients should be dealt with remotely wherever possible. However, if they need to be seen face-to-face they should have a home visit.

It also recommends that local areas set up separate home visiting services for these patients for when they do need a face-to-face appointment. They shouldn't attend the surgery. Strict infection control processes should be employed when visiting these patients.

Continued here:
How GP practices should support shielded patients during the COVID-19 outbreak - GP online

Read More...

Are immune-compromised kids at greater risk from Covid-19? – Health24

Tuesday, May 5th, 2020

One of the few bright spots in the Covid-19 pandemic has been the perception that children are mostly spared from its worst effects. But what about kids already at risk of contracting serious infections due to a compromised immune system? Do they have the same protection?

"One group we always worry about when it comes to viral illnesses is immunocompromised children," said Dr Reggie Duerst, director of the stem cell transplant programme at Children's Hospital of Chicago. These kids are typically more at risk of known viral illnesses, such as chickenpox, common cold viruses and flu.

But, he said, because there's so little information available on Covid-19 infections, it's hard to know how much higher the risk might be for children with compromised immune systems.

So far, he said, the incidence of Covid-19 infections in his hospital is very low.

Dr Basim Asmar, chief of infectious disease at Children's Hospital of Michigan, said it's just not clear yet whether or not children with compromised immune systems are more likely to get Covid-19 infections. It's also unclear if they would have more severe complications if they got an infection.

"We're not really sure right now. We're still learning, and every day we're learning something new. But with other viral infections, immunocompromised children tend to have a more prolonged course," Asmar said.

Dr Mehreen Arshad, a member of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and an assistant professor of paediatrics at Northwestern University in Chicago, agreed that there's just not a lot of data on children and Covid-19 yet, especially kids with compromised immune systems. She said that immunocompromised children likely have less risk from Covid-19 than older adults do, but they may have more risk than children with healthy immune systems. She added it's important to "take all precautions" to lessen the risk of infection for these children.

Which kids have a compromised immune system?

Duerst said many children who are being treated for cancer and those receiving stem cell transplants or organ transplants tend to have compromised immune systems. There are also inherited immune deficiency conditions. Children who have certain autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis or lupus, may take medications that dampen their immune system's response.

Other children who might be at a higher risk include those with cystic fibrosis and other lung diseases because their lung capacity is already compromised.

Among children who've received a stem cell transplant, the immune systems of those who get their own cells back (autologous transplant) are close to normal after a year or two, Duerst said. In kids who get stem cells from a donor (allogeneic transplant), "they are on ongoing immune suppression for three to six months, and often longer. If they have a smooth course, by two years they begin to return to normal," he said.

Kids who've had an organ transplant may remain on immune-suppressing drugs for a long time, often for life.

So, what steps do parents need to take to keep these youngsters safe?

Arshad said, "I would be a little more stringent for children with compromised immunity. Stay inside as much as possible. Don't have contact with anyone at higher risk, like grandparents, or anyone with symptoms. Don't go to stores. Avoid crowds."

She noted that "these families are used to taking precautions already. They may be more aware of the potential dangers."

Asmar agreed that it's important to follow common-sense infection prevention. And, he added, "If someone is ill within the family, even the mother or father, they should try to avoid coming in contact with the child, and should stay in a separate room."

In addition, Asmar said that children with compromised immune systems should be as up-to-date on immunisations as possible.

If your child has a compromised immune system and gets sick, Duerst said to call the physician treating the immune-compromising condition to get instructions. "There are multiple reasons you do not want to enter just any emergency room entrance," he said. But with a number of precautions and screening in place, hospitals are "still a relatively safe place to be," he added.

Arshad said that for more routine visits, kids can often be seen via telehealth. And if there's something a doctor needs to see your child for, the doctor might have your child stay in the car and come out to you.

"While we're not seeing immune-compromised children get an overwhelming number of infections, there's no reason to be complacent," she noted.

READ | Coronavirus hitting younger children harder than we thought

READ | Keep TB vaccine for babies, implore experts

READ | Up 50 000 US kids may be hospitalised with Covid-19 by year's end

See the article here:
Are immune-compromised kids at greater risk from Covid-19? - Health24

Read More...

Stem Cell Biology and Its Complications – The New York Times

Monday, April 27th, 2020

The renewed debate over embryonic stem cells highlights the advances and complications that have arisen in the field since its controversial beginnings.

The cells are a sort of blank slate, plucked from human embryos just a few days after fertilization. They tantalize scientists because they could in theory turn into any of the bodys 200 mature cell types, from blood to brain to liver to heart. They could be used to study and treat diseases and to study the basic biology of what determines a cells destiny why a heart cell becomes a heart cell, for example, instead of a brain cell.

The problem is their origin human embryos. In order to get stem cells, embryos must be destroyed. It is this fact that led to the court ruling on Monday blocking most federal financing for embryonic stem cell research.

The scientist who isolated human embryonic stem cells in 1998 struggled with this dilemma, consulting ethicists before proceeding. But in the end, the scientist, Dr. James Thomson of the University of Wisconsin, decided to go ahead because the embryos were from fertility clinics and were going to be destroyed anyway. And, he reasoned, the work could greatly benefit humanity.

Yet despite the high hopes for embryonic stem cells, progress has been slow so far there are no treatments with the cells. The Food and Drug Administration just approved the first clinical study, a dose and safety test, of human embryonic stem cells to treat spinal cord injuries.

All along, though, scientists wondered if they could sidestep the ethical debate by creating embryonic stem cells without the embryos. Every cell has the same DNA. A heart cell is different from a liver cell because it uses different genes. But all the genes to make a liver cell, or any other cell, are there in the cell. The liver genes are masked in a heart cell and vice versa. Why cant scientists find a way to unmask all of a cells genes and turn it directly into a stem cell without using an embryo?

A few years ago, two groups of researchers one led by Dr. Thomson did just that. They discovered that all they had to do was add four genes and a cell would reprogram itself back to its original state when it was a stem cell in an embryo. Like an embryonic stem cell, that reprogrammed cell seemed to be able to then turn into the many kinds of specialized cells in the body, an ability called pluripotent.

What has happened since that discovery, scientists say, is that stem cell biology turned out to be more complicated than they anticipated. Besides the stem cells from embryos, there are so-called adult stem cells found in all tissues but with limited potential because they can only turn into cells from their tissue of origin. And there are these newer cells made by reprogramming mature cells.

Now researchers are trying to figure out whether stem cells made by this reprogramming process really are the same as ones taken from embryos. Some say they found subtle differences between these cells, known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or I.P.S.C.s, and embryonic stem cells. Others are not so sure.

They say they need embryonic stem cells as a basis of comparison, a gold standard to see if the newer reprogrammed cells are as good.

We are not at the stage where you will find many investigators saying, We dont need embryonic stem cells because I.P. cells are the same, said Dr. Timothy Kamp, a stem cell researcher and professor of medicine at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. We dont know that yet.

One complication is that different labs use different methods to obtain the reprogrammed cells and to study them, Dr. Kamp said. As a result, he said, not all I.P. cells are the same.

John Gearhart, director of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, and one of the first to isolate human embryonic stem cells, said some investigators ended up with reprogrammed cells that will have little utility. They are only partly reprogrammed, he explains.

One worries about how safe and effective they are going to be if they are ever used in therapies, Dr. Gearhart said.

Dr. George Q. Daley, a stem cell researcher at Childrens Hospital in Boston, saw subtle differences in a recent study. When he just compared the two types of cells side by side with molecular tests, they looked identical. Then he tried turning them into various types of mature cells and comparing the results.

Dr. Daley published a paper in March, in Nature Biotechnology, reporting that mouse I.P.S.C.s from different tissues remembered, in a sense, where they came from. He has a similar paper under review showing the same effect with human induced pluripotent stem cells.

In the mouse study, it was harder to get pluripotent mouse cells derived from a skin cell, for example, to turn into blood cells than it was to get pluripotent stem cells made from blood cells to turn into blood cells.

They tended to remember their tissue of origin, Dr. Daley said.

Researchers need to find ways to make the cells forget where they came from, he said.

Rudolf Jaenisch, a stem cell researcher and biology professor at M.I.T., said he was not certain there were meaningful differences between human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent cells.

But to answer that question will require the use of embryonic stem cells for comparisons, Dr. Jaenisch said.

Things are very much in flux, he said. We will probably need human embryonic stem cells for a while. And then we probably will not need them anymore.

Here is the original post:
Stem Cell Biology and Its Complications - The New York Times

Read More...

How effective is PLX cell therapy in treating coronavirus? Experts answer all queries and more – India TV News

Friday, April 24th, 2020

Pluristem Therapeutics or PLX cell therapyuses placentas to grow smart cells, and programs them to secrete therapeutic proteins in the bodies of sick people. It has just treated its first American COVID-19 patient after treating seven Israelis. The patients were suffering from acute respiratory failure and inflammatory complications associated with Covid-19. Now, this theraphy is being touted as a possible 'cure'' for the deadly coronavirus with scientisst conducting varied researches on the same. In an exclusive interaction with India TV, doctors from India and abroadcame together for discussing about how effective can cell therapy be in treating coronavirus. Dr Solomon from Israel, Dr Anil Kaul from the US, DrSanjeev Chaubey from Shanghai and Dr Padma Srivastv and Dr Harsh Mahajan from India threw light upon the stem cell therapy and the possibility of incorporating the same in treating COVID-19 pateints.

Latest News on Coronavirus

Fight against Coronavirus: Full coverage

Read the original here:
How effective is PLX cell therapy in treating coronavirus? Experts answer all queries and more - India TV News

Read More...

Reversing diabetes with CRISPR and patient-derived stem cells – FierceBiotech

Friday, April 24th, 2020

Insulin injections cancontrol diabetes, but patients still experience serious complications such as kidney disease and skin infections. Transplanting pancreatic tissues containing functional insulin-producing beta cells is of limited use, because donors are scarce and patients must take immunosuppressant drugs afterward.

Now, scientists atWashington University in St. Louis havedeveloped a way to use gene editing system CRISPR-Cas9 to edit a mutation in human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and then turnthem into beta cells. When transplanted into mice, the cells reversed preexisting diabetes in a lasting way, according to results published in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

While the researchers used cells from patients with Wolfram syndromea rare childhood diabetes caused by mutations in the WFS1 genethey argue that the combination of a gene therapy with stem cells could potentially treat other forms of diabetes as well.

Virtual Clinical Trials Online

This virtual event will bring together industry experts to discuss the increasing pace of pharmaceutical innovation, the need to maintain data quality and integrity as new technologies are implemented and understand regulatory challenges to ensure compliance.

One of the biggest challenges we faced was differentiating our patient cells into beta cells. Previous approaches do not allow for this robust differentiation. We use our new differentiation protocol targeting different development and signaling pathways to generate our cells, the studys lead author, Kristina Maxwell, explained in a video statement.

Making pancreatic beta cells from patient-derived stem cells requires precise activation and repression of specific pathways, and atthe right times, to guide the development process. In a recent Nature Biotechnology study, the team described a successful method that leverages the link between a complex known as actin cytoskeleton and the expression of transcription factors that drive pancreatic cell differentiation.

This time, the researchers applied the technology to iPSCs from two patients with Wolfram syndrome. They used CRISPR to correct the mutated WFS1 gene in the cells and differentiated the edited iPSCs into fully functional beta cells.

After transplanting the corrected beta cells into diabetic mice, the animals saw their blood glucose drop quickly, suggesting the disease had been reversed. The effect lasted for the entire six-month observation period, the scientists reported. By comparison, those receiving unedited cells from patients were unable to achieve glycemic control.

RELATED:CRISPR Therapeutics, ViaCyte team up on gene-edited diabetes treatment

The idea of editing stem cells with CRISPR has already attracted interest in the biopharma industry. Back in 2018, CRISPR Therapeutics penned a deal with ViaCyte to develop off-the-shelf, gene-editing stem cell therapies for diabetes. Rather than editing iPSCs from particular patients themselves to correct a faulty gene, the pairs lead project used CRISPR to edit healthy cells so that they lackedthe B2M gene and expressed PD-L1 to protect against immune attack. The two companies unveiled positive preclinical data inSeptember.

Other research groups working on gene therapy or stem cells for diabetes include a Harvard University scientist and his startup Semma Therapeutics, whichdeveloped a method for selecting beta cells out of a mixture of cells developed from PSCs. Scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison recently proposed that removing the IRE1-alpha gene in beta cells could prevent immune T cells from attacking them in mice with Type 1 diabetes.

The Washington University team hopes its technology may help Type 1 diabetes patients whose disease is caused by multiple genetic and environmental factors as well as the Type 2 form linked to obesity and insulin resistance.

We can generate a virtually unlimited number of beta cells from patients with diabetes to test and discover new drugs to hopefully stop or even reverse this disease, Jeffrey Millman, the studys co-senior author, said in the video statement. Perhaps most importantly, this technology now allows for the potential use of gene therapy in combination with the patients own cells to treat their own diabetes by transplantation of lab-grown beta cells.

Continue reading here:
Reversing diabetes with CRISPR and patient-derived stem cells - FierceBiotech

Read More...

Discovered the physiological mechanisms underlying the most common pediatric Leukemia – Science Codex

Friday, April 24th, 2020

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is characterized by the accumulation of abnormal immature B-cell precursors (BCP) in the bone marrow (BM) and is the most common pediatric cancer. Among the different subtypes known in B-ALL, the most common one is characterized by the presence of a higher number of chromosomes than in healthy cells and is called High hyperdiploid B-ALL (HyperD-ALL). This genetic abnormality is an initiating oncogenic event affiliated to childhood B-ALL, and it remains poorly characterized.

HyperD-ALL comprises 30% of pediatric B-ALL and usually has a favorable clinical outcome, with 90% of survival in patients with this hematologic cancer. Despite this, until date, there was very little knowledge on how hyperdiploidy occurs in HyperD-ALL, as an initiating oncogenic event in B-ALL and which secondary alterations are necessary for leukemic B-ALL cells accumulation in the bone marrow, impeding the growth of healthy cells and leading to the clinical leukemia complications.

A precise knowledge of the physiopathogenic mechanisms underlying HyperD- ALL was necessary because the morbidity/mortality associated with HyperD-ALL still represents a clinical challenge due to the high number of patients suffering from this type of B-ALL. For this reason, Oscar Molina, researcher of the Group of Stem Cells, Developmental Biology, and Immunotherapy of the Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, has led research on the mechanisms underlying HyperD-ALL, unveiling how and why it happens, published in Blood Journal this April 2020.

Molina and the co-authors of the study hypothesized that the origin of the pathogenic mechanisms associated with hyperdiploidy in B-ALL could be in the moment of the cell's division, known as mitosis, which is a highly orchestrated cellular process that controls the equal distribution of the genetic material, already duplicated and compacted in chromosomes, in two "newborn" cells.

"We knew already that HyperD-ALL arises in a BCP in utero. However, the causal molecular mechanisms of hyperdiploidy in BCPs remained elusive. As faithful chromosome segregation is essential for maintaining the genomic integrity of cells, and deficient chromosome segregation leads to aneuploidy and cancer, we wanted to observe and deepen on what is happening in chromosomes' segregation in HyperD-ALL, because we suspected that by studying cell division in these cells we would find an explanation to this oncogenic process."

Molina was right. Researchers used a large cohort of primary pediatric B-ALL samples, 54. What Molina and his colleagues discovered was that three key processes and actors for correct mitosis or cell division and chromosome segregation were misfunctioning in hyperdiploid cells; that artificial disruption of these processes in blood cells with normal chromosome numbers generated hyperdiploid cells resembling those in B-ALL samples. Therefore, shedding light on the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in HyperD-ALL origin and progression.

The main proteins and processes leading to fatal error were a malfunctioning of the Condensin complex, a multiprotein complex responsible for helping condense the genetic material correctly into chromosomes; the protein Aurora B kinase, that is responsible for a correct chromosome attachment to the spindle poles, thus ensuring proper chromosome segregation; and the mitotic checkpoint, or Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC), the cell machinery involved in controlling that chromosomes are correctly separated to each pole of the cell that is dividing.

With these findings, Molina et al. have unveiled the molecular mechanisms that are altered in this frequent type of pediatric blood cancer.

"Next steps would be to study whether other subtypes of B-ALL with abnormal chromosome numbers, such as hypodiploid B-ALL, a very aggressive subtype of pediatric blood cancer characterized by lower numbers of chromosomes, share a common molecular mechanism. These studies will allow generating the first in vivo models of leukemias with abnormal chromosome numbers in mice that will be crucial to understand its origin and development, thus facilitating the development of more targeted and less toxic therapies for these pediatric blood cancers" stated Oscar Molina.

Here is the original post:
Discovered the physiological mechanisms underlying the most common pediatric Leukemia - Science Codex

Read More...

A rampage through the body – Science Magazine

Friday, April 24th, 2020

The lungs are ground zero, but COVID-19 also tears through organ systems from brain to blood vessels.

Science's COVID-19 coverage is supported by the Pulitzer Center.

The coronavirus wreaked extensive damage (yellow) on the lungs of a 59-year-old man who died at George Washington University Hospital, as seen in a 3D model based on computed tomography scans.

On rounds in a 20-bed intensive care unit one recent day, physician Joshua Denson assessed two patients with seizures, many with respiratory failure, and others whose kidneys were on a dangerous downhill slide. Days earlier, his rounds had been interrupted as his team tried, and failed, to resuscitate a young woman whose heart had stopped. All of the patients shared one thing, says Denson, a pulmonary and critical care physician at the Tulane University School of Medicine. They are all COVID positive.

As the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 approaches 2.5 million globally and deaths surpass 166,000, clinicians and pathologists are struggling to understand the damage wrought by the coronavirus as it tears through the body. They are realizing that although the lungs are ground zero, the virus' reach can extend to many organs including the heart and blood vessels, kidneys, gut, and brain.

[The disease] can attack almost anything in the body with devastating consequences, says cardiologist Harlan Krumholz of Yale University and Yale-New Haven Hospital, who is leading multiple efforts to gather clinical data on COVID-19. Its ferocity is breathtaking and humbling.

Understanding the rampage could help doctors on the front lines treat the roughly 5% of infected people who become desperately and sometimes mysteriously ill. Does a dangerous, newly observed tendency to blood clotting transform some mild cases into life-threatening emergencies? Is an overzealous immune response behind the worst cases, suggesting treatment with immune-suppressing drugs could help? And what explains the startlingly low blood oxygen that some physicians are reporting in patients who nonetheless are not gasping for breath? Taking a systems approach may be beneficial as we start thinking about therapies, says Nilam Mangalmurti, a pulmonary intensivist at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP).

What follows is a snapshot of the fast-evolving understanding of how the virus attacks cells around the body. Despite the more than 1500 papers now spilling into journals and onto preprint servers every week, a clear picture is elusive, as the virus acts like no pathogen humanity has ever seen. Without larger, controlled studies that are only now being launched, scientists must pull information from small studies and case reports, often published at warp speed and not yet peer reviewed. We need to keep a very open mind as this phenomenon goes forward, says Nancy Reau, a liver transplant physician who has been treating COVID-19 patients at Rush University Medical Center. We are still learning.

WHEN AN INFECTED PERSON expels virus-laden droplets and someone else inhales them, the novel coronavirus, called SARS-CoV-2, enters the nose and throat. It finds a welcome home in the lining of the nose, according to a recent arXiv preprint, because cells there are rich in a cell-surface receptor called angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Throughout the body, the presence of ACE2, which normally helps regulate blood pressure, marks tissues potentially vulnerable to infection, because the virus requires that receptor to enter a cell. Once inside, the virus hijacks the cell's machinery, making myriad copies of itself and invading new cells.

As the virus multiplies, an infected person may shed copious amounts of it, especially during the first week or so. Symptoms may be absent at this point. Or the virus' new victim may develop a fever, dry cough, sore throat, loss of smell and taste, or head and body aches.

If the immune system doesn't beat back SARS-CoV-2 during this initial phase, the virus then marches down the windpipe to attack the lungs, where it can turn deadly. The thinner, distant branches of the lung's respiratory tree end in tiny air sacs called alveoli, each lined by a single layer of cells that are also rich in ACE2 receptors.

Normally, oxygen crosses the alveoli into the capillaries, tiny blood vessels that lie beside the air sacs; the oxygen is then carried to the rest of the body. But as the immune system wars with the invader, the battle itself disrupts healthy oxygen transfer. Frontline white blood cells release inflammatory molecules called chemokines, which in turn summon more immune cells that target and kill virus-infected cells, leaving a stew of fluid and dead cellspusbehind (see graphic, below). This is the underlying pathology of pneumonia, with its corresponding symptoms: coughing; fever; and rapid, shallow respiration. Some COVID-19 patients recover, sometimes with no more support than oxygen breathed in through nasal prongs.

But others deteriorate, often suddenly, developing a condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome. Oxygen levels in their blood plummet, and they struggle ever harder to breathe. On x-rays and computed tomography scans, their lungs are riddled with white opacities where black spaceairshould be. Commonly, these patients end up on ventilators. Many die, and survivors may face long-term complications (see sidebar, p. 359). Autopsies show their alveoli became stuffed with fluid, white blood cells, mucus, and the detritus of destroyed lung cells.

Some clinicians suspect the driving force in many gravely ill patients' downhill trajectories is a disastrous overreaction of the immune system known as a cytokine storm, which other viral infections are known to trigger. Cytokines are chemical signaling molecules that guide a healthy immune response; but in a cytokine storm, levels of certain cytokines soar far beyond what's needed, and immune cells start to attack healthy tissues. Blood vessels leak, blood pressure drops, clots form, and catastrophic organ failure can ensue.

Some studies have shown elevated levels of these inflammation-inducing cytokines in the blood of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The real morbidity and mortality of this disease is probably driven by this out of proportion inflammatory response to the virus, says Jamie Garfield, a pulmonologist who cares for COVID-19 patients at Temple University Hospital.

But others aren't convinced. There seems to have been a quick move to associate COVID-19 with these hyperinflammatory states. I haven't really seen convincing data that that is the case, says Joseph Levitt, a pulmonary critical care physician at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

He's also worried that efforts to dampen a cytokine response could backfire. Several drugs targeting specific cytokines are in clinical trials in COVID-19 patients. But Levitt fears those drugs may suppress the immune response that the body needs to fight off the virus. There's a real risk that we allow more viral replication, Levitt says.

Meanwhile, other scientists are zeroing in on an entirely different organ system that they say is driving some patients' rapid deterioration: the heart and blood vessels.

IN BRESCIA, ITALY, a 53-year-old woman walked into the emergency room of her local hospital with all the classic symptoms of a heart attack, including telltale signs in her electrocardiogram and high levels of a blood marker suggesting damaged cardiac muscles. Further tests showed cardiac swelling and scarring, and a left ventriclenormally the powerhouse chamber of the heartso weak that it could only pump one-third its normal amount of blood. But when doctors injected dye in her coronary arteries, looking for the blockage that signifies a heart attack, they found none. Another test revealed the real cause: COVID-19.

How the virus attacks the heart and blood vessels is a mystery, but dozens of preprints and papers attest that such damage is common. A 25 March paper in JAMA Cardiology found heart damage in nearly 20% of patients out of 416 hospitalized for COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. In another Wuhan study, 44% of 36 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) had arrhythmias.

The disruption seems to extend to the blood itself. Among 184 COVID-19 patients in a Dutch ICU, 38% had blood that clotted abnormally, and almost one-third already had clots, according to a 10 April paper in Thrombosis Research. Blood clots can break apart and land in the lungs, blocking vital arteriesa condition known as pulmonary embolism, which has reportedly killed COVID-19 patients. Clots from arteries can also lodge in the brain, causing stroke. Many patients have dramatically high levels of D-dimer, a byproduct of blood clots, says Behnood Bikdeli, a cardiovascular medicine fellow at Columbia University Medical Center.

The more we look, the more likely it becomes that blood clots are a major player in the disease severity and mortality from COVID-19, Bikdeli says.

Infection may also lead to blood vessel constriction. Reports are emerging of ischemia in the fingers and toesa reduction in blood flow that can lead to swollen, painful digits and tissue death.

In the lungs, blood vessel constriction might help explain anecdotal reports of a perplexing phenomenon seen in pneumonia caused by COVID-19: Some patients have extremely low blood-oxygen levels and yet are not gasping for breath. In this scenario, oxygen uptake is impeded by constricted blood vessels rather than by clogged alveoli. One theory is that the virus affects the vascular biology and that's why we see these really low oxygen levels, Levitt says.

If COVID-19 targets blood vessels, that could also help explain why patients with pre-existing damage to those vessels, for example from diabetes and high blood pressure, face higher risk of serious disease. Recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data on hospitalized patients in 14 U.S. states found that about one-third had chronic lung diseasebut nearly as many had diabetes, and fully half had pre-existing high blood pressure.

Mangalmurti says she has been shocked by the fact that we don't have a huge number of asthmatics or patients with other respiratory diseases in her hospital's ICU. It's very striking to us that risk factors seem to be vascular: diabetes, obesity, age, hypertension.

Scientists are struggling to understand exactly what causes the cardiovascular damage. The virus may directly attack the lining of the heart and blood vessels, which, like the nose and alveoli, are rich in ACE2 receptors. By altering the delicate balance of hormones that help regulate blood pressure, the virus might constrict blood vessels going to the lungs. Another possibility is that lack of oxygen, due to the chaos in the lungs, damages blood vessels. Or a cytokine storm could ravage the heart as it does other organs.

We're still at the beginning, Krumholz says. We really don't understand who is vulnerable, why some people are affected so severely, why it comes on so rapidly and why it is so hard [for some] to recover.

THE WORLDWIDE FEARS of ventilator shortages for failing lungs have received plenty of attention. Not so a scramble for another type of equipment: kidney dialysis machines. If these folks are not dying of lung failure, they're dying of renal failure, says neurologist Jennifer Frontera of New York University's Langone Medical Center, which has treated thousands of COVID-19 patients. Her hospital is developing a dialysis protocol with a different kind of machine to support more patients. What she and her colleagues are seeing suggests the virus may target the kidneys, which are abundantly endowed with ACE2 receptors.

According to one preprint, 27% of 85 hospitalized patients in Wuhan had kidney failure. Another preprint reported that 59% of nearly 200 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China's Hubei and Sichuan provinces had protein in their urine, and 44% had blood; both suggest kidney damage. Those with acute kidney injury were more than five times as likely to die as COVID-19 patients without it, that preprint reported.

The lung is the primary battle zone. But a fraction of the virus possibly attacks the kidney. And as on the real battlefield, if two places are being attacked at the same time, each place gets worse, says co-author Hongbo Jia, a neuroscientist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences's Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology.

One study identified viral particles in electron micrographs of kidneys from autopsies, suggesting a direct viral attack. But kidney injury may also be collateral damage. Ventilators boost the risk of kidney damage, as do antiviral compounds including remdesivir, which is being deployed experimentally in COVID-19 patients. Cytokine storms can also dramatically reduce blood flow to the kidney, causing often-fatal damage. And pre-existing diseases like diabetes can increase the chances of kidney injury. There is a whole bucket of people who already have some chronic kidney disease who are at higher risk for acute kidney injury, says Suzanne Watnick, chief medical officer at Northwest Kidney Centers.

ANOTHER STRIKING SET of symptoms in COVID-19 patients centers on the brain and nervous system. Frontera says 5% to 10% of coronavirus patients at her hospital have neurological symptoms. But she says that is probably a gross underestimate of the number whose brains are struggling, especially because many are sedated and on ventilators.

Frontera has seen patients with the brain inflammation encephalitis, seizures, and a sympathetic storm, a hyperreaction of the sympathetic nervous system that causes seizurelike symptoms and is most common after a traumatic brain injury. Some people with COVID-19 briefly lose consciousness. Others have strokes. Many report losing their sense of smell and taste. And Frontera and others wonder whether, in some cases, infection depresses the brain stem reflex that senses oxygen starvationanother explanation for anecdotal observations that some patients aren't gasping for air, despite dangerously low blood oxygen levels.

ACE2 receptors are present in the neural cortex and brain stem, says Robert Stevens, an intensive care physician at Johns Hopkins Medicine. And the coronavirus behind the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemica close cousin of today's culpritwas able to infiltrate neurons and sometimes caused encephalitis. On 3 April, a case study in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, from a team in Japan, reported traces of new coronavirus in the cerebrospinal fluid of a COVID-19 patient who developed meningitis and encephalitis, suggesting it, too, can penetrate the central nervous system.

But other factors could be damaging the brain. For example, a cytokine storm could cause brain swelling. The blood's exaggerated tendency to clot could trigger strokes. The challenge now is to shift from conjecture to confidence, at a time when staff are focused on saving lives, and even neurologic assessments like inducing the gag reflex or transporting patients for brain scans risk spreading the virus.

Last month, Sherry Chou, a neurologist at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, began to organize a worldwide consortium that now includes 50 centers to draw neurological data from care patients already receive. Early goals are simple: Identify the prevalence of neurologic complications in hospitalized patients and document how they fare. Longer term, Chou and her colleagues hope to gather scans and data from lab tests to better understand the virus' impact on the nervous system, including the brain.

No one knows when or how the virus might penetrate the brain. But Chou speculates about a possible invasion route: through the nose, then upward and through the olfactory bulbexplaining reports of a loss of smellwhich connects to the brain. It's a nice sounding theory, she says. We really have to go and prove that.

A 58-year-old woman with COVID-19 developed encephalitis, with tissue damage in the brain (arrows).

Most neurological symptoms are reported from colleague to colleague by word of mouth, Chou adds. I don't think anybody, and certainly not me, can say we're experts.

IN EARLY MARCH, a 71-year-old Michigan woman returned from a Nile River cruise with bloody diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Initially doctors suspected she had a common stomach bug, such as Salmonella. But after she developed a cough, doctors took a nasal swab and found her positive for the novel coronavirus. A stool sample positive for viral RNA, as well as signs of colon injury seen in an endoscopy, pointed to a gastrointestinal (GI) infection with the coronavirus, according to a paper posted online in The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG).

Her case adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting the new coronavirus, like its cousin SARS, can infect the lining of the lower digestive tract, where ACE2 receptors are abundant. Viral RNA has been found in as many as 53% of sampled patients' stool samples. And in a paper in press at Gastroenterology, a Chinese team reported finding the virus' protein shell in gastric, duodenal, and rectal cells in biopsies from a COVID-19 patient. I think it probably does replicate in the gastrointestinal tract, says Mary Estes, a virologist at Baylor College of Medicine.

Recent reports suggest up to half of patients, averaging about 20% across studies, experience diarrhea, says Brennan Spiegel of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, coeditor-in-chief of AJG. GI symptoms aren't on CDC's list of COVID-19 symptoms, which could cause some COVID-19 cases to go undetected, Spiegel and others say. If you mainly have fever and diarrhea, you won't be tested for COVID, says Douglas Corley of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, co-editor of Gastroenterology.

The presence of virus in the GI tract raises the unsettling possibility that it could be passed on through feces. But it's not yet clear whether stool contains intact, infectious virus, or only RNA and proteins. To date, We have no evidence that fecal transmission is important, says coronavirus expert Stanley Perlman of the University of Iowa. CDC says that, based on experiences with SARS and with the coronavirus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome, the risk from fecal transmission is probably low.

The intestines are not the end of the disease's march through the body. For example, up to one-third of hospitalized patients develop conjunctivitispink, watery eyesalthough it's not clear that the virus directly invades the eye.

Other reports suggest liver damage: More than half of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in two Chinese centers had elevated levels of enzymes indicating injury to the liver or bile ducts. But several experts told Science that direct viral invasion isn't likely the culprit. They say other events in a failing body, like drugs or an immune system in overdrive, are more likely causes of the liver damage.

This map of the devastation that COVID-19 can inflict on the body is still just a sketch. It will take years of painstaking research to sharpen the picture of its reach, and the cascade of effects in the body's complex and interconnected systems that it might set in motion. As science races ahead, from probing tissues under microscopes to testing drugs on patients, the hope is for treatments more wily than the virus that has stopped the world in its tracks.

Read the rest here:
A rampage through the body - Science Magazine

Read More...

NHS’s oldest IVF clinic at risk of closure amid increasing privatisations – The Guardian

Friday, April 24th, 2020

The UKs oldest NHS fertility clinic is at risk of closure and another has been put out to private tender, as IVF provision is increasingly privatised and rationed.

Hospital bosses want to close the internationally renowned department of reproductive medicine at St Marys hospital, Manchester, saying they cannot afford to fund a 10m upgrade of the unit, the Guardian has learned.

In Leeds, the entire NHS provision of fertility and other gynaecology services was put out to tender earlier this year, with private clinics invited to bid for a 10-year contract estimated at 70m to provide reproductive care.

Two years ago North Bristol NHS trust sold off its IVF clinic to a private provider, saying it was no longer feasible because of a reduction in NHS-funded patients.

In England, the proportion of fertility treatment funded by the NHS dropped from 39% in 2012 to 35% in 2017, according to figures published last year by the regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). This is at odds with the rest of the UK, where public funding has remained stable or increased.

When it opened in 1982, four years after the first test tube baby, Louise Brown, was born in nearby Oldham, St Marys was the UKs first fully NHS funded IVF unit. It now performs over 2,000 fertility treatments every year, including around 1,200 IVF cycles, and offers highly specialised fertility preservation for cancer patients. It is also a top research centre, which led on the use of ovarian reserve tests to guide ovarian stimulation, the development of stem cell lines from human embryos, and the effects of IVF on baby birth weights.

The Manchester University NHS foundation trust (MFT) said no decisions had been made over the units future. But staff were briefed last month that the HFEA and local clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) had been told that all licensed treatment and research on the site may end by April 2021 if an alternative solution cannot be found.

MFT, which runs the hospital, is also exploring options including redeploying services and some of its 107 staff including many highly specialised roles but confirmed to staff that closure was a possibility.

The Guardian spoke to 10 members of staff at St Marys aware of the mooted closure. One said they understood the matter to be settled: St Marys have taken a proposal to the MFT group board to discontinue the IVF service and the group board have said, Yes, OK. How they discontinue it is what they need to decide next, they said.

If the change goes ahead, CCGs, which fund fertility treatment, will have to pay private clinics to carry out IVF and other fertility services. But staff at St Marys warn that the private sector will not be able to carry out some of the most specialised services currently offered by the NHS.

We offer highly specialised procedures in the NHS which private providers wont touch because they dont make money and are too difficult. For example, we aim to see women diagnosed with cancer within a week who want to freeze their eggs before they start chemotherapy. Many of these women are already very poorly and need really high quality anaesthetic care during egg collection, and that is just not available in the private sector because of the medical complications, said one source.

They added: Private clinics are also unlikely to help patients with kidney problems or heart problems. But when they come to us, we can address these issues before they begin IVF: a huge advantage of being part of a multi-disciplinary NHS Trust. Those patients will be disadvantaged if this happens.

They also expressed concerns about screening procedures in the private sector. In the NHS, anyone applying for fertility treatment undergoes a series of stringent checks, including an assessment of the welfare of the child: Our checks and ethics advisory committee often flag issues including prison sentences, a serious history of domestic violence, even people on the sex offender register. At private clinics they dont do anything like the same background checks.

A number of separate proposals were put to MFT to try to save some or all of the clinic, including turning the service into a social enterprise and forming a partnership with a private provider, as is being proposed in Leeds.

The deadline to apply to run the Leeds service was 23 March, the day the government announced the coronavirus lockdown in the UK. Shortly afterwards, clinics stopped all new treatments and the HFEA ordered private and NHS clinics to stop treating patients in the middle of an IVF cycle by 15 April.

A spokesperson for the MFT, which runs St Marys hospital, said no decision had been taken to shut the clinic permanently.

They said: Services provided by the department of reproductive medicine at St Marys hospital are regularly reviewed as part of a usual cycle to ensure that we continue to provide the best possible care and treatments for all our service users. No decisions have been made, therefore it would be inappropriate to provide any further detail before the outcome of any review has been finalised.

The HFEA said it could not disclose informal discussions between clinics and inspectors.

Many St Marys staff are worried not just about their patients and their jobs, but the logistics of closing down the clinic. Moving thousands of sperm samples and embryos held in freezers, for use in both treatment and research, was a mind-boggling challenge, said one.

One staff member said: Although possible relocation was mentioned, the fact that no viable alternative has been identified and that the cost was described as being too high left us thinking that this is not being explored and that closing the unit is the direction of travel. We are worried for our jobs but our biggest concern is for our patients, particularly those with the most complex needs who cannot be served elsewhere without high costs.

IVF provision has been put under pressure, nationally, by NHS funding cuts over the past decade leading to a postcode lottery of provision. Now only a minority of English CCGs offer the recommended three funded IVF cycles, with some refusing to fund any NHS fertility treatment at all.

Read more here:
NHS's oldest IVF clinic at risk of closure amid increasing privatisations - The Guardian

Read More...

Ozzy Osbournes Daughter Kelly Reports the Singer Is Making Mind Blowing Progress After Stem Cell Treatment – mxdwn.com

Wednesday, April 1st, 2020

Aaron Grech April 1st, 2020 - 8:11 PM

The godfather of heavy metal Ozzy Osbourne is making mind blowing health progress according to his daughter Kelly Osbourne, who recently spoke to Entertainment Tonight. The performer was receiving stem cell treatment recently, to help support his battle against complications caused by Parkinsons disease.

Seeing after one treatment of stem cell what has happened and the progress that hes made is mind-blowing, Kelly Osbourne stated. He wants to get up. He wants to do things. He wants to be part of the world again. Hes walking better. Hes talking better. His symptoms are lessening. He is building the muscle strength back that he needs after his spine surgery.

Osbourne revealed that he had Parkinsons disease at the beginning of this year during an interview withGood Morning AmericasRobin Roberts. Kelly Osbourne also explained that the her father has been feeling better as a result of his treatment, although he is still forced to stay inside due to the fears associated with the spread of COVID-19.

Everything is starting to fall into place now and it has given us so much hope, she explained. We are very grateful to the doctors that are helping him. Hes ready to get out of the house and now he cant get out of the house. He keeps saying to me, Ive been on quarantine for almost two years, and now Im feeling better and the world is on quarantine.

Osbourne has faced a slew of health complications in recent years, froma bout ofpneumonia, to a stage injury which requiredintense surgery.He has had to cancel multiple tours during the past couple of years due to his health concerns although he was in the studio last year to record his latest studio album release Ordinary Man.

Continue reading here:
Ozzy Osbournes Daughter Kelly Reports the Singer Is Making Mind Blowing Progress After Stem Cell Treatment - mxdwn.com

Read More...

Akari Therapeutics Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results and Business Highlights – PharmiWeb.com

Wednesday, April 1st, 2020

Significant Clinical Progress Across Target Indications during 2019 and 2020 Year-to-Date

NEW YORK and LONDON, March 31, 2020 - Akari Therapeutics, Plc (Nasdaq: AKTX), a biopharmaceutical company focused on innovative therapeutics to treat orphan autoimmune and inflammatory diseases where complement (C5) and/or leukotriene (LTB4) systems are implicated, today announced financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2019, as well as recent business highlights.

2019 was a very important year for the company as we generated positive clinical data across all four of our programs. For BP, AKC and HSCT-TMA, the rapid patient response we generally saw in our clinical studies validates these disease targets for nomcaopan where the specific dual action of the drug provides a potential significant differentiation with its inhibition of both the complement (C5) and leukotriene (LTB4) pathways, said Clive Richardson, Chief Executive Officer of Akari Therapeutics. In 2020, we look forward to expanding these programs further and plan on focusing on preparatory work for potential pivotal studies in anticipation of lessening the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time we are working with our employees, partners and patients to help ensure their safety and maintain continuity where possible.

Full Year 2019 and Recent Business Highlights

Akaris strategy is to focus on orphan inflammatory diseases with significant unmet medical need, where the role of the complement and leukotriene systems are implicated. Akaris lead programs are in BP, AKC, and HSCT-TMA where clinical data with nomacopan has shown rapid and sustained clinical improvement in patients. These diseases have no approved treatments.

The Company is working with clinical sites and is following regulatory and health agency guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic to help ensure the safety of its employees and patients. Our BP study has completed recruitment while our AKC study has halted recruitment with around two thirds of patients recruited. We expect delays in opening sites for our HSCT-TMA program. We expect our long-term safety program will shift to being managed on a country by country basis and some disruption is expected.

Phase II clinical trial in patients with BP

In the fourth quarter of 2019, interim Phase II trial results with nomacopan were presented at the 28th European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress. The data showed that four of the six patients were classified as at the upper limit of moderate BP. The four patients saw a rapid and significant improvement in symptoms, with a mean 63% decline in BPDAI score and mean 68% decline in blister score by Day 42, with either no or minimal early steroid treatment with one moderate patient having a flare up post Day-28. The data showed nomacopans potential as a possible treatment for BP with the additional and important benefit of reducing steroid use which has multiple adverse effects including a threefold increased risk of mortality. The Phase II trial has completed recruitment, with full data expected in the second quarter of 2020.

During the third quarter of 2019, the FDA granted orphan drug designation for nomacopan for the treatment of BP. The Company is now evaluating pivotal trial designs.

Phase III clinical trial in pediatric patients with HSCT-TMA

Initiated a pivotal Phase III trial for HSCT-TMA with nomacopan following the opening of an IND by the FDA. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, although we are looking to continue the process of site openings, we anticipate this will be delayed and hence any enrollment. This two-part Phase III study in pediatric patients with HSCT-TMA is based on guidance from the Companys end-of-Phase II meeting with the FDA. Part A of the trial is a dose confirmation study with the dosing agreed with FDA via their Model Informed Drug Development Program (MIDD). Part B of the trial is a single arm responder-based efficacy study that will follow an interim analysis of Part A and a meeting with the FDA. This devastating condition has an estimated 80% mortality rate in children, at elevated risk of dying who will be recruited to the trial and has no approved treatments. Akari has both FDA fast track pediatric patients and orphan drug designation status for this program.

Phase I/II clinical trial in patients with AKC

In 2019, the Company successfully completed Part A of the Phase I/II clinical trial in severe AKC patients who showed a rapid overall improvement of a mean 55% in the composite clinical score. The nomacopan eye drops were found to be comfortable and well tolerated with no reported drug related serious adverse events. Enrollment in the Part B placebo-controlled efficacy arm of the study has now stopped due to the COVID outbreak, but recruited patients continue to be treated. We anticipate that when the trial closes, we will have data on around two thirds of the target 19 patient study.

During the first quarter of 2020, the Company announced new preclinical data indicating that PAS-nomacopan, the long acting form of the drug, significantly reduced both retinal inflammation and intraocular VEGF. PAS-nomacopan was found to reduce intraocular VEGF levels by as much as the anti-VEGF antibody with 74% (p=0.04) and 68% (p=0.05) reductions respectively, compared to saline control. Furthermore, while clinically assessed inflammation increased in both the control and anti-VEGF groups by 49% and 33%, respectively, PAS-nomacopan treatment resulted in a 9% reduction in inflammation which represents a 58% difference compared to control assessed by retinal fundoscopy (p=0.02). This therapeutic activity across multiple pathogenic pathways (VEGF, inflammation and complement) supports the potential for nomacopan as a new mode of action for the treatment of back of the eye diseases.

PNH program

The Company continues to accumulate positive long-term treatment data, which includes more than 30 cumulative patient-years of data with 14 PNH patients across four clinical trialswith no reported drug related serious adverse events. Interim data from the Phase III CAPSTONE study on the first eight PNH patients who were all transfusion dependent at entry to the CAPSTONE trial show that all four patients randomized to nomacopan were transfusion independent for the first six months of treatment while all four patients on standard of care (SOC) remained transfusion dependent. Recruitment into the Phase III CAPSTONE study has been discontinued, although a PNH program may be re-initiated to potentially take advantage of the new high concentration formulation.

Akari has been granted orphan status from theFDA andthe European Medicines Agency(EMA) for nomacopan for treatment of PNH.

Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results

A copy of the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and posted on the Companys website at http://investor.akaritx.com/financial-information/sec-filings. You may request a copy of the Companys Form 20-F, at no cost to you, by writing to the Financial Controller of the Company at 75/76 Wimpole Street, London W1G 9RT, United Kingdom or by calling the Company at +44 20 8004 0261.

Important Message Regarding COVID-19

Public health epidemics or outbreaks could adversely impact our business. In late 2019, a novel strain of COVID-19, also known as coronavirus, was reported in Wuhan, China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China, it has now spread to several other countries, including in the United Kingdom and the United States, and infections have been reported globally. In particular, our clinical trial sites are based in areas currently affected by coronavirus. Epidemics such as this can adversely impact our business as a result of disruptions, such as travel bans, quarantines, and interruptions to access the trial sites and supply chain, which could result in material delays and complications with respect to our research and development programs and clinical trials. Moreover, as a result of coronavirus, there is a general unease of conducting unnecessary activities in medical centers. As a consequence, our ongoing trials have been halted or disrupted. It is too early to assess the full impact of the coronavirus outbreak on trials for nomacopan, but coronavirus is expected to affect our ability to complete recruitment in our original timeframe. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration and severity of the outbreak, and the actions that may be required to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact. In particular, the continued spread of the coronavirus globally, could adversely impact our operations and workforce, including our research and clinical trials and our ability to raise capital, could affect the operations of key governmental agencies, such as the FDA, which may delay the development of our product candidates and could result in the inability of our suppliers to deliver components or raw materials on a timely basis or at all, each of which in turn could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation.

About Akari Therapeutics

Akari is a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing inhibitors of acute and chronic inflammation, specifically for the treatment of rare and orphan diseases, in particular those where the complement (C5) or leukotriene (LTB4) systems, or both complement and leukotrienes together, play a primary role in disease progression. Akari's lead drug candidate, nomacopan (formerly known as Coversin), is a C5 complement inhibitor that also independently and specifically inhibits leukotriene B4 (LTB4) activity. Nomacopan is currently being clinically evaluated in four indications: bullous pemphigoid (BP), atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Akari believes that the dual action of nomacopan on both C5 and LTB4 may be beneficial in AKC and BP. Akari is also developing other tick derived proteins, including longer acting versions.

Original post:
Akari Therapeutics Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results and Business Highlights - PharmiWeb.com

Read More...

FDA Clears CytoDyn’s Phase 2 Randomized Trial to Treat Mild-to-Moderately Ill Coronavirus Patients with Leronlimab; Enrollment to Begin Immediately -…

Wednesday, April 1st, 2020

VANCOUVER, Washington, March 31, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) CytoDyn Inc. (OTC.QB: CYDY), (CytoDyn or the Company), a late-stage biotechnology company developing leronlimab (PRO 140), a CCR5 antagonist with the potential for multiple therapeutic indications, announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) just provided clearance for initiation of a Phase 2 trial with CytoDyns leronlimab to treat COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate indications. The Companys investigational new drug, leronlimab, has been administered to 10 severely ill patients with COVID-19 at a leading medical center in the New York City area under an emergency IND recently granted by the FDA. The treatment with leronlimab is intended to serve as a therapy for patients who experience mild-to-moderate respiratory complications as a result of contracting SARS-CoV-2 causing the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

The Phase 2 clinical trial is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leronlimab in patients with mild to moderate documented COVID-19 illness and calls for 75 planned patients in up to 10 centers in the United States. Patients enrolled in the trial are expected to have a treatment window of approximately 6 weeks.

Bruce Patterson, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and founder of IncellDx, a diagnostic partner and advisor to CytoDyn, commented, We are very pleased with the FDAs responsiveness to facilitate the commencement of this important Phase 2 trial. In light of the test results of the various immunologic markers from the critically ill patients treated under the emergency IND, we remain hopeful that leronlimab may be therapeutically beneficial to those COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate indications.

Nader Pourhassan, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of CytoDyn said, The FDA has been very collaborative with our team to accelerate the opportunity to introduce a potentially beneficial treatment to so many patients affected by this horrific pandemic. We hope to complete enrollment of this trial very quickly.

About Coronavirus Disease 2019SARS-CoV-2 was identified as the cause of an outbreak of respiratory illness first detected in Wuhan, China. The origin of SARS-CoV-2 causing the COVID-19 disease is uncertain, and the virus is highly contagious. COVID-19 typically transmits person to person through respiratory droplets, commonly resulting from coughing, sneezing, and close personal contact. Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses, some causing illness in people and others that circulate among animals. For confirmed COVID-19 infections, symptoms have included fever, cough, and shortness of breath. The symptoms of COVID-19 may appear in as few as two days or as long as 14 days after exposure. Clinical manifestations in patients have ranged from non-existent to severe and fatal. At this time, there are minimal treatment options for COVID-19.

About Leronlimab (PRO 140)The FDA has granted a Fast Track designation to CytoDyn for two potential indications of leronlimab for deadly diseases. The first as a combination therapy with HAART for HIV-infected patients and the second is for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.Leronlimab is an investigational humanized IgG4 mAb that blocks CCR5, a cellular receptor that is important in HIV infection, tumor metastases, and other diseases, including NASH.Leronlimab has completed nine clinical trials in over 800 people, including meeting its primary endpoints in a pivotal Phase 3 trial (leronlimab in combination with standard antiretroviral therapies in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients).

In the setting of HIV/AIDS, leronlimab is a viral-entry inhibitor; it masks CCR5, thus protecting healthy T cells from viral infection by blocking the predominant HIV (R5) subtype from entering those cells. Leronlimab has been the subject of nine clinical trials, each of which demonstrated that leronlimab could significantly reduce or control HIV viral load in humans. The leronlimab antibody appears to be a powerful antiviral agent leading to potentially fewer side effects and less frequent dosing requirements compared with daily drug therapies currently in use.

In the setting of cancer, research has shown that CCR5 may play a role in tumor invasion, metastases, and tumor microenvironment control. Increased CCR5 expression is an indicator of disease status in several cancers. Published studies have shown that blocking CCR5 can reduce tumor metastases in laboratory and animal models of aggressive breast and prostate cancer. Leronlimab reduced human breast cancer metastasis by more than 98% in a murine xenograft model. CytoDyn is, therefore, conducting aPhase 1b/2 human clinical trial in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and was granted Fast Track designation in May 2019.

The CCR5 receptor appears to play a central role in modulating immune cell trafficking to sites of inflammation. It may be crucial in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and other inflammatory conditions. Clinical studies by others further support the concept that blocking CCR5 using a chemical inhibitor can reduce the clinical impact of acute GvHD without significantly affecting the engraftment of transplanted bone marrow stem cells. CytoDyn is currently conducting a Phase 2 clinical study with leronlimab to support further the concept that the CCR5 receptor on engrafted cells is critical for the development of acute GvHD, blocking the CCR5 receptor from recognizing specific immune signaling molecules is a viable approach to mitigating acute GvHD. The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to leronlimab for the prevention of GvHD.

About CytoDynCytoDyn is a late-stage biotechnology company developing innovative treatments for multiple therapeutic indications based on leronlimab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the CCR5 receptor. CCR5 appears to play a critical role in the ability of HIV to enter and infect healthy T-cells.The CCR5 receptor also appears to be implicated in tumor metastasis and immune-mediated illnesses, such as GvHD and NASH. CytoDyn has successfully completed a Phase 3 pivotal trial with leronlimab in combination with standard antiretroviral therapies in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients. CytoDyn plans to seek FDA approval for leronlimab in combination therapy and plans to complete the filing of a Biologics License Application (BLA) in April of 2020 for that indication. CytoDyn is also conducting a Phase 3 investigative trial with leronlimab as a once-weekly monotherapy for HIV-infected patients. CytoDyn plans to initiate a registration-directed study of leronlimab monotherapy indication. If successful, it could support a label extension. Clinical results to date from multiple trials have shown that leronlimab can significantly reduce viral burden in people infected with HIV with no reported drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Moreover, a Phase 2b clinical trial demonstrated that leronlimab monotherapy can prevent viral escape in HIV-infected patients; some patients on leronlimab monotherapy have remained virally suppressed for more than five years. CytoDyn is also conducting a Phase 2 trial to evaluate leronlimab for the prevention of GvHD and a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial with leronlimab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. More information is atwww.cytodyn.com.

Forward-Looking StatementsThis press releasecontains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Words and expressions reflecting optimism, satisfaction or disappointment with current prospects, as well as words such as believes, hopes, intends, estimates, expects, projects, plans, anticipates and variations thereof, or the use of future tense, identify forward-looking statements, but their absence does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. The Companys forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance, and actual results could vary materially from those contained in or expressed by such statements due to risks and uncertainties including: (i)the sufficiency of the Companys cash position, (ii)the Companys ability to raise additional capital to fund its operations, (iii) the Companys ability to meet its debt obligations, if any, (iv)the Companys ability to enter into partnership or licensing arrangements with third parties, (v)the Companys ability to identify patients to enroll in its clinical trials in a timely fashion, (vi)the Companys ability to achieve approval of a marketable product, (vii)the design, implementation and conduct of the Companys clinical trials, (viii)the results of the Companys clinical trials, including the possibility of unfavorable clinical trial results, (ix)the market for, and marketability of, any product that is approved, (x)the existence or development of vaccines, drugs, or other treatments that are viewed by medical professionals or patients as superior to the Companys products, (xi)regulatory initiatives, compliance with governmental regulations and the regulatory approval process, (xii)general economic and business conditions, (xiii)changes in foreign, political, and social conditions, and (xiv)various other matters, many of which are beyond the Companys control. The Company urges investors to consider specifically the various risk factors identified in its most recent Form10-K, and any risk factors or cautionary statements included in any subsequent Form10-Q or Form8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, the Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of this press release.

CYTODYN CONTACTSInvestors:Dave Gentry, CEORedChip CompaniesOffice: 1.800.RED.CHIP (733.2447)Cell: 407.491.4498dave@redchip.com

More:
FDA Clears CytoDyn's Phase 2 Randomized Trial to Treat Mild-to-Moderately Ill Coronavirus Patients with Leronlimab; Enrollment to Begin Immediately -...

Read More...

Page 9«..891011..20..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick