header logo image


Page 22«..10..21222324..3040..»

Archive for the ‘Preventative Medicine’ Category

Housing advocates call for expanded aid to those struggling to pay rent or find housing – WABI

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2020

BANGOR, Maine (WABI) - Housing advocates from several organizations held a live online event Monday to highlight the challenges many renters face right now.

Several Mainers shared their stories of having no money for rent or being unable to find safe housing.

The pandemic has thrown a spotlight on some of the ways vulnerable populations have been under-served.

They called for a moratorium on evictions and foreclosures, a cancellation of rent and housing for the homeless.

They also want the Maine Housing Authority emergency rent relief fund expanded.

Crystal Cron, President of Prsente! Maine, led the discussion.

The public health of our community depends on the health of the entire public. We need to protect all of us and ensure that the basic needs of our community are met during this public health crisis and always. Housing is the preventative medicine we need to keep our community safe in the next crisis. Lets make sure we learn from this crisis and get people secure housing right now.

You can find a link to the full recorded livestream below.

Link:
Housing advocates call for expanded aid to those struggling to pay rent or find housing - WABI

Read More...

COVID-19 antibody and diagnostic testing continues to increase locally – Steamboat Pilot and Today

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2020

STEAMBOAT SPRINGS As the accuracy of COVID-19 antibody tests improve and become more readily available, questions linger about the information those tests can provide.

Of the 1,000 tests the Steamboat Emergency Center obtained, theyve only administered several hundred at this point, according to Dr. Jesse Sandhu. As a result of the low testing number, he said its too soon to get a sense of how many Routt County residents have been exposed to the virus.

However, Sandhu said theyve been surprised thus far at how many people are testing positive for the antibodies.

Steamboat Emergency Center is also using multiple levels of verification, including a PCR diagnostic test as well as sending some of the antibody tests to a lab for the more sensitive ELISA test.

Support Local JournalismDonate

The point is the antibodies are there, Sandhu said. We are getting a surprisingly decent amount of positives.

Most of the people going in for the antibody tests believe they were exposed to COVID-19 around February or March, Sandhu said, before testing was available to anyone other than the most critically ill.

At a local level, Sandhu said one of the most valuable pieces of information that can come from the centers data subset will be in tracking people with antibodies to see if they get reinfected with the virus.

Only then can doctors and scientists better understand what level if any of immunity people have who have previously been exposed to COVID-19.

As of last week, UCHealth is also offering antibody test and diagnostic testing to anyone who wants it in Colorado.

Many people have been interested in getting antibody tested, because they want to know if they have been exposed to COVID-19, or they want to know if they are possibly immune to COVID-19, said UCHealth Chief Innovation Officer Dr. Richard Zane in a news release. Unfortunately, for now, the only thing we can tell you is that, if you have antibodies, you have been exposed to COVID-19. We cannot tell you, yet, whether you are immune to it.

While there has been a lot of concern about the accuracy of antibody tests, the tests being used by the Steamboat Emergency Center and UCHealth Yampa Valley Medical Center are authorized by the Food and Drug Administration.

There are only a few FDA-authorized tests currently on the market.

The antibody tests that UCHealth now provides have been evaluated by the FDA and far exceed the agencys requirements for accuracy and specificity, according to a UCHealth news release. These are among the few antibody tests authorized by the FDA, and they are among the most accurate being offered in the nation. The test UCHealth is offering is greater than 98% specific, meaning that there are fewer than one in 1,000 errors.

The test being used at the Steamboat Emergency Center has a specificity of 96%.

There are many commercial tests available and being utilized at other medical facilities, Sandhu said. Many of these test are not accurate and do not have FDA authorization. Always ask the brand of the test being used and cross reference it on the FDA site to make sure it is truly authorized.

While most insurance plans do cover both the antibody and diagnostic tests, health care providers are recommending patients check with their individual plans.

In terms of out-of-pocket costs, Steamboat Emergency Center is offering the antibody test for $199. Yampa Valley Medical Center offers theirs for $100.

We have very high confidence in the antibody test UCHealth is now able to offer, said Dr. Laura Sehnert, the hospitals chief medical officer. However, we still have a lot to learn about what it truly means to have COVID-19 antibodies how long theyll last, if theyll prevent re-infection, etc.

The presence of COVID-19 antibodies does not mean you can forget everything weve done over the last few months, Sehnert explained. Our community has done a great job social distancing, wearing masks and performing hand hygiene. As Steamboat Springs begins to welcome back second homeowners and visitors, it remains of the utmost importance for all of us to continue to practicing these behaviors.

Sandhu notes that while people are hoping the summer season slows the virus down, that is far from a certainty at this point. He also observed that people may concentrate travel plans to places like Routt County, knowing there is low disease prevalence, and it is easier to social distance.

But he is excited about getting more antibody data going forward, especially as the early results provide evidence that more people had it then realized. Some of the people who tested positive for antibodies are reaching out to others they had close contact with around the time they were sick, Sandhu said, and encouraging them to also get an antibody test.

In terms of diagnostic testing, the Routt County Department of Public Health will continue to offer drive-thru testing through June and July. And as supplies increase, they continue to opening up testing to more people, including asymptomatic volunteers.

Kari Ladrow, public health director for Routt County, also emphasized the importance of contact tracing going forward.

Contact tracing is one of the cornerstones of preventative medicine and public health and is particularly crucial in the current pandemic by identifying individuals who have been exposed quickly and isolating, quarantining and testing them, Ladrow said in a news release. Community participation in the process of contact tracing is critical for virus suppression and continued economic and community recovery.

The disease mitigation efforts our county has undertaken appear to have been very effective, Routt County Public Health Medical Officer Brian Harrington said in a May 27 news release. The opening of restaurants and short-term lodging represent factors that could increase the presence and transmission of COVID 19 in our community. I emphasize that COVID-19 remains in our community.

Just this weekend, we had a resident of Craig test positive, Harrington continued. That resident had been in our county while infected with the COVID-19 infection. It is important that people in Routt County continue to practice social distancing, wear face masks in public and stay at home if sick with COVID-19 symptoms until they have contacted their primary care provider or gotten a negative COVID-19 test.

To reach Kari Dequine Harden, call 970-871-4205, email kharden@SteamboatPilot.com or follow her on Twitter @kariharden.

Continue reading here:
COVID-19 antibody and diagnostic testing continues to increase locally - Steamboat Pilot and Today

Read More...

Outdoor enthusiasts reminded that tick season is in full swing – ECM Publishers

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2020

As the temperatures continue to rise and the days grow longer, many rural Minnesotans start spending more time outdoors. Campers, hikers, hunters or those enjoying a bit of recreation time in a park or any wooded area are likely familiar with a small, eight legged creature that could cause a lot of trouble: ticks.

Morrison County itself is noted as a high-risk area for people contracting Lyme disease, and according to David Neitzel, an infectious disease epidemiology researcher with the Minnesota Department of Health, central Minnesota is unfortunately a hotbed for ticks in general.

The state is home to 12 species of ticks, but the ticks most interested in human blood, and most dangerous to humans, Neitzel said, are the blacklegged tick, formerly called the deer tick and the American dog tick, a standard wood tick.

Although dog ticks are usually just an unwelcome pest, they can carry diseases that transmit to humans such as the Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Tularemia, although it is rare. This tick is widespread across the state and can inhabit wooded and prairie type areas, they are typically brown with cream colored markings, Neitzel said.

In central Minnesota in general the blacklegged tick numbers seem to be much higher than in other parts, he said.

The blacklegged tick is just 1/2 to 2/3 the size of its wood tick counterpart, and carries Lyme disease, the most common tick-borne disease.

Blacklegged ticks prefer woods and brushy habitat. If youre not walking around in the woods, youre not likely to come into contact with these ticks and the diseases that they transmit, he said.

Blacklegged ticks are not found in open areas as they are susceptible to dry weather and can die just by drying out, which is why they prefer the comfort of the damp leaves on the forest floor.

If we have some nice humid weather some ticks come out and they are ready to feed unfortunately, Neitzel said.

A difference in biology is also why a common wood tick doesnt spread Lyme disease. Neitzel said they can contract it when they are in early stages of life, but as they grow, the disease bacteria cant sustain itself in the body of a wood tick, however a blacklegged tick makes a perfect host.

Lyme disease and anaplasmosis, all those disease agents live in small animals like white footed mice, chipmunks and other common small mammals that we find across Minnesota. The ticks get infected with those disease agents when they feed on those small mammals, Neitzel said.

Ticks only feed once in each life stage, he said, so after hatching from an egg the larvae will find a small mammal to feed on, then as a nymph and an adult they may attach to a larger host like a white tail deer or a human, possibly spreading a disease. Adult female ticks need their largest meal at that stage so they can lay thousands of eggs and start the cycle over.

Tick season starts as soon as the snow melts and adult sightings will fade out by July, Neitzel said. Then a second wave of adults will come out during the fall, another time to be cautious in the woods.

More important though is the nymph stage, that intermediate stage. They come out from mid-May to mid-July theyre about a millimeter in length, pure black/brown color really hard to see unless youre looking closely for them. A lot of people never really know they are bitten by a tick and thats the riskiest life stage because theyre so hard to see, he said.

Because of their small size, Neitzel said he likes to tell people to take even more precaution when they stop seeing adult ticks and think the season is over. Since ticks are cold blooded, they move faster in warm weather and are able to crawl from an ankle to the top of a head in maybe 20 minutes, Neitzel said. However a tick can be found anywhere constricted and warm such as an armpit, back of the knee or near the belt-line.

A tick can be present on a host for up to five days, Neitzel said, and if someone finds an engorged tick on themselves, its likely there was time to transmit whatever disease it was carrying.

For Lyme disease a tick needs to be attached for one to two days before it transits the bacteria. So the quicker you check yourself for ticks and the quicker you can get them off of you, the better, he said.

Luckily, making a point to search for ticks after every trip to the woods can drastically decrease the chance of contracting Lyme disease. Since his position requires him to attract ticks, Neitzel doesnt use repellent, and has relied on the search and remove method for years.

A shower will unfortunately not kill a wood tick, Neitzel said. Ticks breathe through holes on the side of their body and need very little oxygen, so if theyre submerged, they simply close the holes and can hunker down for hours if needed.

So, if a person isnt looking to attract ticks, they may want to take some precautions.

Some basic recommendations are to wear long light pants and pull long socks over the top of them to spot ticks quickly, then Neitzel recommends a repellent with Deet or Permethrin.

A lot of people that live in central Minnesota say I live out in the woods. I cant put on repellent every time I go outside, thats just not practical. We agree that itd be hard to do all the time, but Permethrin-based repellents are really good in that you can take the pants that you wear when you do yard work and you can treat those pants with Permethrin and the repellent lasts for several weeks even through multiple washings, he said.

Neitzel also said assuredly that Permethrin, also a treatment for head lice, has a very low toxicity to humans and does not slough after its dry, so children and pets exposed wont be affected.

About 40% of adult blacklegged ticks carry Lyme disease and about 20% of nymph ticks carry the disease, but again because of their size more people are infected with Lyme disease during nymph peak season, Neitzel said.

If someone has been in a wooded area in the past month and develops any unexplained rash or rashes with fever, muscle aches, fatigue or similar symptoms, Neitzel recommends a trip to the doctor. The sooner a person knows the better, he said, so if a tick is found obviously remove it and watch the bite location. The saliva from the tick can be irritating so a little redness may occur but if it worsens or turns into that unmistakable bullseye, its time to go in.

Only 63% of Lyme disease cases showed presentation of bullseye according to MDH. In 2018, 950 confirmed Lyme disease cases were reported in Minnesota with an additional 591 probable cases that did not meet clinical criteria but showed laboratory evidence of infection.

The number of cases has been on a steady incline showing a median range of 913 cases from 2000 to 2008, increasing to 1,203 cases from 2009 to 2017.

Each year 400 to 600 cases of anaplasmosis, another disease transmitted by a blacklegged tick, are reported by MDH, and about a quarter of cases are hospitalized each year. Other more rare diseases spread by blacklegged ticks include: babesiosis, Powassan virus disease and ehrlichiosis.

You dont have to go very far to find a tick infected with one of these disease agents and quite often ticks will be carrying more than one, Neitzel said.

Often when people go out into nature, they bring along their dogs, who can also contract Lyme disease. Dr. Amanda Craft at Animal Haven Veterinary Clinic in Little Falls said they talk to clients every day about ticks, prevention and treatment options.

Just within the last five years, Craft said there has been a lot of advancement in preventative medicine for dogs. Most clinics offer topical or oral treatment and some can last up to 12 weeks.

The products you find through a veterinarian are much more effective, are better studied and they are a lot safer than over the counter products, she said.

A topical treatment works by repelling ticks and an oral product will kill the ticks once they bite the dog. There is also a preventative vaccine for Lyme disease, so Craft said if all precautions are taken, risk to a dog is pretty low.

Preventing ticks from attaching to dogs is also important as they can contract anaplasmosis.

A lot of times when I tell people their dog has Lyme disease or anaplasmosis theyll say they were familiar with it because theyve had it which I find really interesting. It just shows how prevalent it is, said Craft.

Symptoms of Lyme disease infection for dogs include: fever, limping, poor appetite, soreness or not seeming like themselves. The diseases are so prevalent that Craft tests for them each year when she runs the annual heartworm disease test.

The ones that come in that are really ill that we see and diagnose and treat are ones that have no protection sometimes if theyre covered by a vaccine they are seeing less symptoms, she said.

We see a lot less disease in dogs that are treated with preventative measures that people are aware of and they dont want their dogs to get sick, she said.

A dog with untreated Lyme disease can go into kidney failure, Craft said, so paying attention to pets and taking precautions is the best way to prevent them from becoming very ill. The diseases can be treated with a simple antibiotic but catching it early is key.

Animals are so good at hiding illness that sometimes theyre sick for a while and get to the point where treatment is not an option, she said.

As for cats or rabbits, Craft said there is a topical preventative, but there isnt a Lyme disease vaccine. She said those animals are more likely to become anemic from ticks than they are to contract a disease.

For all pets, the search and remove method along with any preventative treatments, is the best way to prevent tick-borne diseases.

View original post here:
Outdoor enthusiasts reminded that tick season is in full swing - ECM Publishers

Read More...

Coronavirus medicine ready within 6 months, antibody discoverer says – NL Times

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2020

A medicine against the coronavirus may be ready within the coming six months, professor of cell biology Frank Grosveld of Erasmus University, said to NPO Radio 1. Grosveld and several other scientists discovered the first coronavirus antibodies in March, sparking hopes for a medicine.

Over the past weeks, much progress was made in testing the medicine on living beings, Grosveld said. "The medicine will be there in five, six months." An American company will be developing the medicine, but he could not say which company exactly.

Grosveld is hopeful that the impact of this medicine will be enormous. "This antibody responds to SARS1, it also works on the current coronavirus, which is also known as SARS2. If there is a SARS3, it is likely to respond well to it," he said. "You can use it as a medicine if you are already infected, and as a preventative for high-risk groups."

According to the professor, the Dutch government pushed several hundred thousand euros into this research.

Read more from the original source:
Coronavirus medicine ready within 6 months, antibody discoverer says - NL Times

Read More...

Highly Respected Telemedicine Expert, Dr. Bob Arnot, Joins eCare21 Team Along With Alan Morell, Creative Management Partners, as Senior Advisor -…

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2020

Orlando, FL, June 02, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- via NEWMEDIAWIRE -- eCare21 is pleased to announce that Dr. Bob Arnot, MD will join the company as Chief Medical Officer.Dr. Bob is a best-selling author, Emmynomineeand Dupont award-winning correspondent,producer, writer and recently joined the team atCOVID-19 Urgent Resource Video Education (CURVE)withMassachusetts General Hospital.

Dr. Arnot is also focusing on Machine Learning solutions with his broad background in systems architecture and user interface design. He has strong media and communication skills, is a Doctor of Medicine (MD) and has experience working with Google, Apple, NBC News, MSNBC, and HIMSS. Dr Bobs second focus is food technology with his deep background in analytical chemistry and human trials.

In addition, eCare21 is pleased to announce the engagement of THE CREATIVE MANAGEMENT AGENCY: Creative Management Partners LLC, and its CEO, Alan Morell, as the companys Senior Advisor with the goal of building the eCare21 brand within the rapidly expanding Senior Care and Virtual Care markets. Mr. Morell has 30 years of global experience in the successful development and management of talent, literary, TV and film packaging, commercial rights, corporate consulting, media positioning, sponsorship of live events and intellectual property (IP) rights. Mr. Morell is one of only a few in the sports, entertainment and arts industries who has represented and managed clients that have won the prestigious awards: Grammy; Tony; Oscar; Emmy, ESPY and Victors.

Vadim Cherdak, PhD, founder and CEO of eCare21, said, We are thrilled at the opportunity to work with Dr. Bob, one of the most recognized TV and media medical ambassadors and with his Uber-Agent, Alan Morell, who has made so many major books, movies, and TV programs happen. Mr. Morell manages more doctors than any agency in the world and we are excited to have his #1 doctor, Dr. Bob, join our team. We are looking forward to bringing Telehealth and advanced health care solutions to the home of every senior in the US and around the world.

When I was introduced to eCare21 by my longtime valued client, Dr. Bob Arnot, and my client Matt Weisensee, it was clear the team at eCare21 had built something very special, said Alan Morell, and preventative care technology would become essential, especially in these COVID-19 new normal times. I quickly realized we would need to leverage the reach of Broadcast Media to gain the attention of the majority of seniors who suffer from chronic illnesses. eCare21s patient-centric Virtual Care platform provides an easy-to-use, comprehensive turn-key solution that includes Telehealth and remote monitoring combined with patient engagement services to help avert potentially adverse health issues. In addition, after vetting Founder/CEO, Vadim Cherdak, and President/COO, Pete Stevenson, I found eCare21 Senior Management, with their cutting-edge Virtual Care solution, to have superior skillsets and expertise with high integrity who can implement their mission and be Wall Street friendly. I am honored to work with them, and I know Dr. Bob is as well.

About eCare21

eCare21 (eCare21.com) is a patient-centric Virtual Care Platformthat combines Telehealth, Remote Patient Monitoring and Chronic Care Management into unified SaaS solution for post-acute care for seniors. eCare21 is the first end-to-end solution for Virtual Care that creates a seamless workflow for delivering healthcare in the home to improve patient outcomes. eCare21 translates the remote patient encounters into billable events and generates a clean, compliant bill aligned with CMS policy. The eCare21 mobile Apps have been recognized as one of the best Apps for caregiving three years in row. For more details on the eCare21 Virtual Care Solution Powered by Dell Technologies: Clickherefor a short video.

Vadim Cherdak732-586-6842vcherdak@ecare21.com

Continued here:
Highly Respected Telemedicine Expert, Dr. Bob Arnot, Joins eCare21 Team Along With Alan Morell, Creative Management Partners, as Senior Advisor -...

Read More...

High-Potency Pot Tied to Big Rise in Psychiatric Issues – HealthDay News

Friday, May 29th, 2020

FRIDAY, May 29, 2020 (HealthDay News) -- Marijuana has long been linked to a host of mental health risks, but the potent strains sold today may amplify those dangers, new research suggests.

"We know that people who use cannabis are more likely to report mental health problems than those who don't use cannabis, but we don't fully understand how recent increases in the strength and potency of cannabis affects this," explained study author Lindsey Hines, a senior research associate from the University of Bristol Medical School in England.

For the study, researchers examined data from a large, ongoing British study and focused on more than 1,000 people who were born in the early 1990s and reported recent pot use when they were 24. The scientists were also able to track which participants had suffered mental health problems as adolescents.

Among those who said they had used pot in the previous year, 13% said they had used high-potency cannabis.

Those who used high-potency pot were four times more likely to have problems with marijuana and two times more likely to suffer from anxiety than those who consumed lower-potency weed, the researchers found.

"People who use cannabis are more likely to report mental health problems than those who don't use cannabis, but reducing the potency and regularity of their cannabis use may be effective for lessening likelihood of harms from use," Hines said in a university news release.

"In countries where cannabis is sold legally, limiting the availability of high-potency cannabis may reduce the number of individuals who develop cannabis use disorders, prevent cannabis use escalating to a regular behavior, and reduce impacts on mental health," she added.

The report was published online May 28 in the journal JAMA Psychiatry.

This is not the first time marijuana has been tied to mental health problems: Research published in April in the journal Advances in Preventative Medicine found nearly half of people who have been or are now dependent on pot have some form of mental illness or dependence on another drug. That compares with 8% of people with no history of pot dependence.

Study author Esme Fuller-Thomson told HealthDay at the time that the study doesn't answer which came first, nor does it prove heavy pot use causes mental problems, but it does show a strong link.

"Not everyone that uses pot is going to develop mental health problems," said Fuller-Thomson, director of the Institute for Life Course and Aging at the University of Toronto.

Fuller-Thomson said she was concerned that legalization of pot will worsen mental health problems, especially among teens and young adults. Most users start as teens, and marijuana can harm the developing brain.

"My kids have to walk by three shops selling marijuana on their way to high school," she said. "We're now doing this very dangerous experiment on adolescents and young adults."

One psychiatrist agreed the trend is troubling.

As legalization of recreational marijuana spreads across the United States, more people are showing up in ERs with psychotic symptoms after consuming too much pot, said Dr. Itai Danovitch, chairman of psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles.

"If somebody gets too high, they use more than intended, they can have psychotic symptoms. That typically resolves as the drug wears off," Danovitch said.

But some unlucky souls with a family history of mental illness might wind up with a full-fledged psychotic disorder that requires extended treatment, he noted.

"That risk is concentrated among a minority of people who have an existing vulnerability to develop a psychotic disorder, a family history of psychosis," Danovitch explained. "There are environmental factors that influence whether somebody develops schizophrenia who has a risk. It appears cannabis probably is one of those factors."

More information

For more on cannabis, head to the U.S. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Medicine.

SOURCES: University of Bristol, news release, May 28, 2020; Advances in Preventative Medicine, April 15, 2020

Read the original:
High-Potency Pot Tied to Big Rise in Psychiatric Issues - HealthDay News

Read More...

Anna Spivey named ND American Legionnaire of the Year – Cavalier County Extra

Friday, May 29th, 2020

You know her when you see her. What many may not know is that a common figure in the Langdon community was nominated by Langdon Post #98 to be the North Dakota American Legion Legionnaire of the Year. Anna Spivey was announced as the 2019 recipient of the Legionnaire of the Year Award in the March issue of the ND American Legion News publication.

I knew they had nominated me, but I was surprised I had won. I feel that people must appreciate what I do, but I just try to do for the Legion and the community what I can with no expectation of reward, Spivey said.

Anna has 23 continuous years of membership with Post #98 following a long involvement in military life as both an active duty member and spouse of an active member. She hasnt been as active as she has been in the past with involvement in the county museum, Frost Fire, and, of course, veteran-related activities such as American Legion and veteran services.

I do these things, and Im always trying to promote and make people aware of what is available in the community. The Legion has all these youth programs. I try to make sure that information is put out. I just try to benefit the community, Spivey shared.

Anna was raised in the Wales area and graduated from Langdon High School. Upon graduation, she entered the US Army and attended basic training at Ft. McClennan, Ala.. Upon completion she was trained in the medical field at Ft. Sam Houston, Texas, then on to Ft. Benning, Ga., where she worked as a health nurse and in preventative medicine.

My duty assignment was army health nurse. We taught prenatal classes for parents and did all the immunizations for military dependents of our service members. The army health nurse would do basically what a public health nurse does, Spivey explained.

During her time in the military, she met Linwood Spivey, a career soldier who was also in the medical field as a combat medic. They were married and became proud parents of two sons. Linwood served two tours in Vietnam, one in Korea and was stationed in Germany twice. Over the course of her husbands career, Spivey was active and involved in their military lifestyle wherever they were stationed.

I have always tried to be helpful to people. On the last tour to Germany, I was part of like the advisory board for our commissary which would be like our grocery store. I was asked to be on that board. I was active with the Red Cross, teaching first aide classes and CPR classes, Spivey said.

Post #98 Commander Harvey Metzger shared that the decision to nominate Spivey for the Legionnaire of the Year was easy. Her commitment to service, not only to the Legion but to the community, is shown when, on her own initiative, she promotes the activities of the American Legion. Spivey does this not only for the local Post events but those of the Department and National as well. Anna is a member of the Posts Color Guard and Honor Guard. She is always a volunteer in helping with Legion baseball, selling anniversary coins, and placing 'Helmets for Heroes' throughout the county. She is active in getting the word out for Boys and Girls State and the oratorical contest. She supports any of Post 98 activities and fundraisers, often providing suggestions for events that she feels strongly about holding.

You can always count on her at the local Post #98 to help out whenever needed. I believe women can make a difference in the American Legion. We appreciate her and her service, Metzger said.

Spivey would have been recognized during the American Legions Department Convention usually held in late June, but due the current health crisis, the convention has been canceled. Recognition for her achievement has left the humble Spivey at a loss for words and surprised as she always tried to operate under the radar.

I try to stay in the background. I just try to make sure the information is put out in the community - what is available to people. I also try to help as I can. Of course, now Im reaching an age where its more difficult, Spivey said.

Spivey tries to promote the Legion and other service organizations as much as she can. She wants to take the opportunity to encourage younger generations to participate and begin helping to serve their community. Spivey is ready to mentor anyone who is interested to learn how to become the next Legionnaire of the Year.

The rest is here:
Anna Spivey named ND American Legionnaire of the Year - Cavalier County Extra

Read More...

Major changes coming to Anderson health care in wake of virus – Independent Mail

Friday, May 29th, 2020

Mike Ellis, Anderson Independent Mail Published 7:43 a.m. ET May 28, 2020 | Updated 7:46 a.m. ET May 28, 2020

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

This story is part of a series begun by USA TODAY capturing what America looks like as state economies slowly reopen. The Rebuilding America project examines what consumers can expect in key drivers of SC commerce.

Healthcare in Anderson County is likely to see fundamental changes in the wake of coronavirus.

Much of the fallout is not yet clear, but it will certainly accelerate telehealth, which isessentially meeting with doctors over video calls instead of in person, and will also accelerate changes in how billing works, said twoexperts from AnMed Health, Anderson County's main health care provider.

An independent physician, Dr. Shane Purcell, agreed those are the major two changes that can be predicted from the coronavirus pandemic at this time.

Purcell said that he would add a third change. His practice has been stable with no layoffsthroughout the coronavirus pandemic as other health systems, including AnMed Health, have had layoffs. Thatcould drive more health care providers and patients into practices like his.

Purcell is one of several doctors atDirect Access MD, an Anderson area family practice that operates outside of traditional insurance and government healthcare models and uses a membership model.

AnMed Health staff and bystanders take photos and video of F-16 planes from The South Carolina Air National Guard 169th Fighter Wing flying over the hospital in Anderson, S.C. Monday, April 27, 2020.(Photo: Ken Ruinard / staff)

Recent: AnMed Health to furlough employees, reduce salary of leadership because of coronavirus

Telehealth may be the most visible change to patients as medical offices go further and faster on long-existing trends in response to coronavirus concerns, said Michael Seemuller, a physician in family practice at Wren Medicine and chair of AnMed Health'sQuality and Safety Committee.

There are a lot of medical appointments that had been done in the past in person that can be done over a video chat, and it will likely become more widely used as people work to avoid potential infections and get comfortable with the format, he said.

The challenge with telehealth is that there is a lot that can be done remotely, such as routine visits, but there will always be people who need to see a doctor physically, for certain tests or checkups, Seemuller said.

Perhaps the biggest challenge, however, is access to telehealth, saidJuana Slade, chief diversity officer for AnMed Health.

She said she recently did a routine medical visit online, it took her 20 minutes.

But that is 20 minutes for someone who is familiar with computers, has the time and space to take 20 minutes and has Internet access that can often require money and locations that not everyone has, she said.

Fixing access in telehealth leads into the other major change, Sladesaid.

Virtual appointments: Coronavirus pandemic drives exponential growth of telehealth in the Upstate

The billing changes may not be as visible as telehealth to most people but may be more meaningful, the experts said.

AnMed Health, and other health systems,had already been working on value-based health care, which shiftsbilling from a per-procedure to an outcome-based billing process, Slade said.

The change will be driven by contractual incentives both from outside vendors and providers and from AnMed Health employees, she said.

Employees look at two wood pallets left on a wall on South Fant Street at AnMed Health, painted with words of encouragement and thanks in Anderson Thursday.(Photo: Ken Ruinard / staff)

If a hospital had been doing 100 of a given procedure with 85 good outcomes, it would have been paid more than if it did 90 of the same procedure with 85good outcomes. The new system aims to give contractual incentives on the outcome, rather than procedure side, and could result in fewer procedures being done because fewer are necessary, Slade said.

Doing fewer procedures would mean less income, illustrated by the furloughs at AnMed Health and in the broader health care economy. But changing the measurable to outcomes could lead to better health overall by nipping problems early, when they are cheaper, which also is better for people, Sladesaid. It also could help improve bottom-line revenue by reducing costs.

The change in emphasis to value-based billingcould help communities by focusing on underlying problems, shesaid.

Instead of treating heart attacks at the emergency room, typically the most expensive way to get health care, it would give AnMed Health incentives to treat a particular few blocks, for example, with preventative medicine like regular doctor's appointments that can be done virtually, Sladesaid.

The change won't be easy, and there are a lot of hurdles.

Slade estimates that 10 percent of health outcomes are up to the work of doctors and medical staff, the rest is the patient's responsibility, and a lot of the patient's outcome will be closely tied to factors like availability of healthy foods and good jobs, of education access and opportunities for health activities.

That means AnMed Health will be working a lot more with police and business communities to get those outcomes, Sladesaid.

Sarah Crowder of St. John's United Methodist Church decorate a cross with a white ribbon for health care workers to go with blue ribbons, before Maundy Thursday in the fellowship hall in Anderson Monday.(Photo: Ken Ruinard / staff)

And because much of this will tie back to regular, and increasingly virtual, doctor's visits, Internet access will be a big factor in any success.

The fallout from coronavirus has so far included furloughs for health care workers and others, it will likely have many other consequences for people's health and the financial structure of health care models in the country.

Many of those are unknown or subject to change, but an increase in telehealth and changes to billing structures are two fairly reliable predictions about the future of health care in Anderson County.

Read or Share this story: https://www.independentmail.com/story/news/2020/05/28/how-anderson-experts-see-healthcare-changing-due-coronavirus-telehealth/5178531002/

Go here to read the rest:
Major changes coming to Anderson health care in wake of virus - Independent Mail

Read More...

Members Of The Board Of Aldermen Question St. Louis Health Director’s Qualifications – St. Louis Public Radio

Friday, May 29th, 2020

Updated at 10:15 p.m. May 27 with Mayor Lyda Krewson's announcement that Dr. Fred Echols will be acting health director

Members of the St. Louis Board of Alderman are questioning Dr. Fred Echols qualifications to be the city's health director.

After learning that Echols no longer has a license to practice medicine, the boards Rules Committee scheduled a meeting this week to investigate his credentials.

As a result, Echols has had to defend his expertise, and city officials and medical professionals have defended his record. But late Wednesday, Mayor Lyda Krewson announced that she and Echols agree that it's in the city's best interests to amend his appointment to acting director.

Under the city charter, the health director must have one of the following qualifications: be a licensed physician, have a master's in public health, or be certified by the American Board of Preventative Medicine and Public Health.

Echols graduated from the Boston University School of Medicine and served as a Navy doctor. He completed a public health training program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and worked at the Illinois Department of Public Health and the St. Louis County Department of Public Health as an infectious disease specialist.

While Echols held a license to practice medicine in the Navy, he let it lapse after he completed his military service and started working in public and community health.

Krewson hired Echols as the citys health director early last year. Echols lack of a license surfaced earlier this spring when he testified in a lawsuit Arch City Defenders filed against the city that sought to block city officials from removing a homeless tent encampment downtown.

Echols and city attorney Julian Bush submitted a correction to Echols testimony in which he originally stated he was licensed to practice medicine. He had misheard the question and worked to correct the record as soon as he could, Echols said.

Alderwoman Sharon Tyus, D-1st Ward, called a joint meeting of the Health and Human Services and Rules committees on Wednesday to investigate Echols qualifications.

One of things thats important about civil service is that we vet people and make sure they meet the qualifications and make sure theyre not being unfairly advantaged or disadvantaged, said Tyus, who chairs the Rules Committee.

Tyus has been critical of the Health Departments response to the coronavirus pandemic, saying she is disappointed by a lack of testing in areas of north St. Louis where many have become ill from the virus.

When Alderwoman Megan Green, D-15th Ward, asked Bush if Echols meets the requirements outlined in the city charter, Bush said regretfully that Echols did not.

I think hes done a splendid job as director of health and hospitals; I think he almost satisfies those requirements, but hes not quite there. And I say that with great regret, Bush said.

Echols told members of the committees Wednesday that he has the educational qualifications to serve as director. He also defended his record, saying the department has worked tirelessly to promote better health for the citys poorest residents and black people in particular.

As long as Im in this role, my heart is in this community, he said. My integrity is really important to me as I move forward. Whether Im in the city or somewhere else, I always want to be truthful and forthcoming with information, particularly as it relates to me and my role and the impact that may have.

Dr. Will Ross, chairman of the Joint Board of Health and Hospitals, told the committee that the training Echols received at the CDC is equal to a public health degree.

I can say, based on my extensive knowledge of public health training programs, this program is robust enough to qualify anyone to serve in a public health leadership position, Ross said.

Krewson said that Echols experience and training are sterling and that he is fully qualified for the position.

Some seek to discredit this highly qualified physician; it is unclear what their motive is, Krewson wrote in a letter to the Board of Aldermen.

Dr. Echols credentials as an MD with extensive public health training are far superior to the minimum qualifications allowed by the city charter, she wrote.

In announcing the decision to amend Echols' appointment to acting director, Krewson wrote in a Facebook post that Echols has the training and experience necessary for the job.

Krewson wrote that in light of that distraction, and the opinion of Bush, she, Echols and Ross had decided it was best for Echols to serve as acting health director.

The committee is expected to resume the hearing Thursday.

Follow Sarah on Twitter: @petit_smudge

Our priority is you. Support coverage thats reliable, trustworthy and more essential than ever.Donate today.

Send questions and comments about this story to feedback@stlpublicradio.org

Continue reading here:
Members Of The Board Of Aldermen Question St. Louis Health Director's Qualifications - St. Louis Public Radio

Read More...

Healthcare precautions likely to persist for near future – Tuscaloosa News

Friday, May 29th, 2020

For the foreseeable future, the preventative measures installed throughout the healthcare community to prevent the spread of coronavirus spread arent expected to go anywhere.

That, at least, is the prediction by those in local medical and senior care industries for the coming weeks and months as Tuscaloosa begins its slow crawl back to pre-COVID-19 conditions.

"I just think theres a lot of unknowns," said Dr. Phillip K. Bobo, "and the next month to month-and-a-half will be critical."

Bobo, a founding partner of Emergi-Care Clinic who has worked in the fields of emergency and family medicine for more than four decades, said he expects society to slowly return to normal as long as people believe it to be safe.

And that, he said, will take a while as many wait to see whether reopening restaurants and non-essential businesses will lead to a sharp increase of coronavirus cases.

"Theyre going tend to stay away from places that they think there will be a high likelihood of contact restaurants, obviously; all medical: hospitals doctors office, clinics, surgery centers all of those are going to have a slow comeback, I think," Bobo said. "If theres a second surge, then we dont know. If theres not a second surge and we survive it and we get into the fall (and) if theres no surge and people are doing better and were out functioning more and we have events ... I think itll come back more rapidly."

Until then, those needing medical procedures can expect to undergo scrutiny and safety measures. And those wanting to visit will still have to wait.

At DCH Health Systems Northport Medical Center and Regional Medical Center in Tuscaloosa, visitation either has been limited or not allowed at all.

Andy North, the hospital systems vice president of marketing and communications, said a number of preventative measures have been put in place since the coronavirus awareness took hold in early- to mid-March. These include universal masking of staff, physicians and visitors, temperature checks of everyone prior to entry, Plexiglas sneeze guards installed at most points of consumer interaction and, on most days, remote site screening services.

And while the Alabama Department of Public Health allowed elective surgeries to resume on May 1, there are currently no plans to relax these measures and, if necessary, the additional services may be halted.

"As a safeguard, the results of a COVID-19 test will be obtained on each patient prior to proceeding with the surgery," North said. "In addition, the current no visitation policy and processes will remain in place for now.

And in places where people are at risk, professionals are getting creative.

While no positive coronavirus cases have been reported at the Crimson Village assisted living facility off 18th Avenue East, Executive Director Rebecca Dennis said she intends to keep it that way.

"The biggest thing were up against right now is these residents are lacking the socialization," she said.

To provide some level of interactivity, Dennis said Crimson Village officials have taken to providing FaceTime conversations with residents and their relatives or bringing residents to windows to see their families through the safety of glass.

But, for now, there are no plans to allow face-to-face interactions like those that took place before the coronavirus arrived.

And, Dennis said, shes not sure when -- or if life will return to normal for Crimson Village seniors.

"Right now, Im not letting them come any closer than the front door," Dennis said. "And as far as physical contact, I dont think the health department or CDC is going to permit families to come in and do huggings and touchings any time soon.

"I know its going to continue for the next few weeks and probably several months. Whats the old saying? Well just have to play it by ear."

Read more:
Healthcare precautions likely to persist for near future - Tuscaloosa News

Read More...

Drug touted by Trump to treat COVID-19 linked to higher death risk: study – WHTC News

Friday, May 29th, 2020

Friday, May 22, 2020 9:18 a.m. EDT by Thomson Reuters

By Michael Erman and Ankur Banerjee

(Reuters) - The anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine, which U.S. President Donald Trump says he has been taking and has urged others to use, was tied to an increased risk of death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, a large study published on Friday showed.

In the study https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/article/s0140673620311806 that looked at more than 96,000 people hospitalized with COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus, those treated with hydroxychloroquine or the related chloroquine had higher risk of death and heart rhythm problems than patients who were not given the medicines.

The study, published in the Lancet medical journal, showed no benefit for coronavirus patients taking the drugs.

Demand for the decades-old hydroxychloroquine has surged as Trump repeatedly promoted its use against the coronavirus, urging people to try it. "What have you got to lose?" he asked.

Trump said this week he has been taking hydroxychloroquine as a preventative medicine despite a lack of scientific evidence.

The Lancet study authors suggested that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine should not be used to treat COVID-19 outside of clinical trials until studies confirm their safety and efficacy in such patients.

There is a frantic search for drugs to treat COVID-19 at the same time that multiple research teams pursue a safe and effective vaccine to combat a pathogen that has killed more than 335,000 people worldwide and sickened millions more.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has allowed healthcare providers to use the drugs for COVID-19 through an emergency-use authorization, but has not approved them to treat it.

Dr. Mandeep Mehra, one of the study's authors, said the research shows that the FDA should withdraw that authorization.

"That will help move this towards more, stronger evidence because it will then force the use of these drugs only in the setting of control trials," Mehra said in an interview. "That would be an extremely wise decision."

The FDA has said that, for safety reasons, hydroxychloroquine should be used only for hospitalized COVID-19 patients or those in clinical trials. The drug has been tied to dangerous heart rhythm problems.

The Lancet study looked at data from 671 hospitals where 14,888 patients were given either hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, with or without an antibiotic, and 81,144 patients were not given such treatments.

Both drugs have shown evidence of effectiveness against the coronavirus in a laboratory setting, but studies in patients had proven inconclusive. Several small studies in Europe and China spurred interest in using hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19, but were criticized for lacking scientific rigor.

Several more recent studies have not shown the drug to be an effective COVID-19 treatment. Last week, two studies published in the medical journal BMJ showed that patients given hydroxychloroquine did not improve significantly over those who were not.

Hydroxychloroquine is used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis as well as malaria.

Hospitalized patients tend to have a more severe version of COVID-19. Some proponents of the drugs for COVID-19 argue that they may need to be administered at an earlier stage to be effective.

There are ongoing randomized, controlled clinical trials to study the drug's effectiveness in preventing infection by the coronavirus as well as treating mild to moderate COVID-19. Some of those may yield results within weeks.

(Reporting by Ankur Banerjee and Manas Mishra in Bengaluru and Michael Erman in New York; Editing by Saumyadeb Chakrabarty, Bill Berkrot, Jonathan Oatis and Will Dunham)

Read the rest here:
Drug touted by Trump to treat COVID-19 linked to higher death risk: study - WHTC News

Read More...

Surviving the coronavirus crisis: A Hopi perspective – Navajo Times

Friday, May 29th, 2020

BACAVI, Ariz.

Standing in his cornfield, Ahkima Honyumptewa said everything about the traditional Hopi lifestyle is meant to strengthen the body, mind and spirit.

Ive always had a connection to this land and a culture to lean on, said the 39-year-old Honyumptewa, who is of the Snake Clan. He suggests the best thing to do during this time of pandemic is to stay engaged in productive activities.

Thats how you can get out of all this craziness mentally, he said. What Im doing to get through is a lot of arts and crafts and farming. Directing energy toward anything constructive, including learning new skills, is a perfect way to make use of this time, and grow as a person, says Honyumptewa. If you keep busy and focused on something productive, youre mind is developing, he said.

As a Hopi farmer, Honyumptewa stresses the importance of going back to some of the basic traditional staples and modeling that for the young people. An award-winning artist, his schedule is that of discipline and structure, including getting up early every morning to work on his craft.

His artwork depicts the seasonal Katsina dances that occur in Hopi. I show the people what we see, he said. I portray it in paintings.

Honyumptewa says he enjoys sharing his culture through his work, which draws a lot of positive feedback, especially from young people. They are just in awe, he said. They take it to heart.

He also makes Hopi textiles and has won numerous awards, including Best of Show for weaving at the 2019 Museum of Northern Arizona Hopi show for a traditional manta, a shawl used for protection.

A dedicated runner, Honyumptewa puts in his miles across the mesas every week in the midday sun.

Be careful in life, but dont be afraid to live life, advises Honyumptewa. Be humble and truthful and we will get through this.

We catch sicknesses because our bodies are out balance, whether its a virus or a cold, said Honyumptewa. All of that is caused by an imbalance.

He said people who behave in a negative way or are mean to other people make themselves more vulnerable, because the energy builds and builds until explodes.

You start getting health problems and youre more vulnerable to sickness when your attitude and your whole being is devoted to to negativity, he said. Not only does it affect the person, he says, but everybody around them. Thats not how were supposed be acting, he said. Were supposed to be the other way. Were supposed to be honest, respectful, and kind.

Honyumptewa believes that people can best help others by first helping themselves through self-knowledge and healing. The number one way to fight any sickness or disease is through happiness, not only loving yourself but loving others, he said. The more you feel that positive energy, the more you protect yourself from harm.

Exercising, eating healthy, and studying new things are key to that, he said. He recommends learning about history, other cultures, sages, and practices such as martial arts and yoga. Study the truth to better the mind, he said.

Honyumptewa believes the best way to serve is through virtue. When you help people you start to gain trust and build connections, he said. As you generate more and more positive energy, you have enough to give it away, he said.

The more positive things you do, the more people want to be around you, said Honyumptewa. Even the animals want to be around you. This relates to the laws of karma, he says, which keep everything in balance. Treat people the way you want to be treated, he said. We all want to be treated with respect.

That also applies to leadership, he said, which keeps a people balanced. Without that, a nation is in chaos, he said. Theres corruption, mistrust, bribery. He believes that is the case with the United States government today. There are all kinds of side deals that the government does that we dont even know about as people, he said. Thats why I dont like this way of life because its like one big crime syndicate. This government robs and steals from the people our energies, our spirits, our selves.

Thats why the world is falling apart, he says, because we are all distracted. The real anti-Christ is someone pretending to be God, said Honyumptewa. Theyre covering it all up behind closed doors.

He says real, true people dont go around claiming they can do things, they just do it out of the goodness of their heart. Most importantly, we never ask anything in return, he said. Everything is supposed to be given freely. He says that is how you know the real medicine men. They dont go out advertising, he said.

Honyumptewa believes people should learn to depend on their own goodness and energy. The only way it works is through good, through compassion, and unconditional love, he said.

As a steward for the land, Honyumptewa feels a strong responsibility to take care of it. We were put here for a reason, he said. This is the center for all spiritual development. He said that was the whole purpose of Hopi migration, which led to Oraibi, from where he descends. The whole Southwest is the spiritual center and what we do here magnifies by ten, he said. If were not strong enough mentally, physically and spiritually, we can hurt ourselves if were unaware of that power that is here.

He says the power can be used for bad or good. For example, if you exercise and train on this land, you can develop ten times faster than anywhere else, he says. Thats why this land is so important, said Honyumtewa. Its a sacred, sacred spot.

Even the Bible talks about the area, he says. Everyone around the world knows this spot as the Garden of Eden, said Honyumptewa. Thats what the Hopi Mesas are, the actual spot of creation.

In the old days, there were springs flowing out of the mesas and water was abundant, he said. He believes all of North and South America belongs to the Natives. That was our responsibility as Native cultures of this land, to migrate and send spiritual roots into the ground, said Honyumptewa. That way the land knows who we are; it feels us.

Long ago, everyone knew that all things were connected, he said. Everything was intertwined, the planting, the ceremonies, the races, everyday life, he said. Thats why we were told not to go away from our culture because of our connection with the earth.

Honyumptewa says today it is a minority who are living by the old ways that served as a natural form of preventative medicine. His advice is to work toward giving up cravings and bad habits, born of this modern world.

It takes patience and time, he said. You just cant give up on yourself. Honyumptewa urges people not be afraid of death, which is a natural part of life, he said.

Life and death is a continuous cycle that repeats itself over and over again, he said. We evolve from stage to stage. Humanity is our teacher, said Honyumptewa. Its a teaching tool spiritually, he said. It teaches us how to connect universally.

He says politics and technology should be avoided, as they are meaningless to spiritual development and are a waste of time. We want to learn things now that will develop our spirit lifetimes from now, he said. The only way to progress through the cycle of life and death is enlightenment.

Related

More here:
Surviving the coronavirus crisis: A Hopi perspective - Navajo Times

Read More...

The benefits and the costs of home DNA tests – Health and Happiness – Castanet.net

Friday, May 29th, 2020

Photo: Contributed

Is the wealth of information about your individual health risks worth the anxiety of knowing?

DNA testing kits have made it possible to access previously unmined information about your health. As a huge advocate of preventative medicine, Ive explored the pros and cons of accessing this wealth of information to see whether your spit is worth the price tag and the consequences.

Firstly, what is it? Companies like 23andMe offer a home-based saliva collection kit you spit in the tube and send it to the lab. From there, your DNA is extracted from the spit and a process called genotyping analyses the DNA.

You then receive a report with your health predispositions (diseases you are more likely to get due to your genes) and your carrier status of certain diseases, such as cystic fibrosis.

The most obvious benefit of getting your DNA tested is identifying your personal health predispositions. For instance, the report might indicate youre at risk of getting type 2 diabetes, or heart disease. With this information, you can make changes to your lifestyle to help prevent these diseases from occurring, such as quitting smoking, drinking less caffeine or eating less sugar.

Despite these benefits, it is important to consider the emotional stress of receiving unfortunate results. Finding out you are at high risk of Alzheimers has a huge emotional impact on an individual and their family, especially as there is little you can do to prevent it.

Personally, I wouldnt want to know Im at high risk for a disease I cant do anything about I think the anxiety the knowledge would cause wouldnt be worth the information.

Its also important to note that genealogy results arent definitive. For instance, they may identify the gene that can cause high cholesterol, which in turn can increase the risk of heart disease. However, the test doesnt take into account any other personal or environmental factors, such as your diet, exercise and lifestyle. Without input from your own family doctor or a genetic counsellor, the results cannot be taken as gospel.

The uses of genealogy DNA databases extend beyond personal use for health and ancestry information, and this is the part where I begin to question the safety of using these kits. Although companies have rigorous privacy policies, they do still keep your DNA and information in a database in order to identify future clients that may be within your family tree.

This data is vulnerable to hackers, but also to police and immigration officials. The CBSA uses genealogy DNA testing in an immigration setting to ascertain a persons identity, such as the country they originate from.

From the uses we know about, to those yet to be found Im not sure I want my DNA in a database with unknown potential.

There are also important financial implications that accompany genetic testing, such as the fact that some insurance companies now say you must disclose any genetic risk information you are aware of, which can mean higher premiums for health, life and travel insurance.

Having mused over the idea for several weeks, with my mouse hovering over the Add to Cart button more than once, Ive decided genetic testing is not for me, for now. I personally dont think you should need a genetic test to tell you to live a healthier lifestyle to exercise more, eat more greens and get better sleep.

If its something youre thinking about, or have done, I would love to hear your thoughts on it. If not, take it from me get out for a cycle or a run, spend more time with your family and eat some broccoli with a smile on your face.

See more here:
The benefits and the costs of home DNA tests - Health and Happiness - Castanet.net

Read More...

From the Archive | Part two: Class, health and medicine – newframe.com

Friday, May 29th, 2020

Mike Haynes is a professor of economics at the University of Wolverhampton in the United Kingdom. His article, Capitalism, class, health and medicine, was published in 2009 by International Socialism and is republished with permission.

I ask myself how, as a physician, I find myself up to my ears with the problems of society, writes Michael Marmot. It is a question that committed doctors have been asking for several generations as they try to explain and cope with the way that illness is moulded by society. Evidence for the social gradient is astonishingly widespread. It affects us all. It is not just about the contrast between the rich and poor but is so fine grained that if we graph illness against some indicator of relative position we see that as relative position improves so does health. Wilkinson calculated that 50 to 75% of the differences in average life expectancy in rich countries are now determined by differences bound up in the distribution of income and related factors. Table 3 shows how this is reflected in the pattern of key illnesses in the UK.

Why should this be? Material need cannot be ignored. Income poverty is not the basis for a good life, and societies with the greatest levels of inequality will also have the largest numbers of poor people. But it is relative poverty and position that matter most. So what is going on? The biomedical answer seems to be that vulnerability and susceptibility to illness and death are related to the degree of adversity in our lives. Some exercise is good for you but relentless physical demands in circumstances over which you have no control drain the body. Similarly, some stress is good for you but relentless worrying about job, home, family, etc not only drains you emotionally but feeds back into physical and mental ill health:

The relationship among the nervous system, the endocrine system, and the immune system is emerging as the pathway that can help our understanding of the changes in health which are associated with changing social and economic conditions.

In other words, although illness arises from bodily processes it is really a product of social organisation. And this is crucial because health follows the social gradient it is not just about improving the conditions of the poorest. In health terms it is in our collective and individual interest to tackle the problem more systematically. As Marmot puts it:

Much of the discussion about social inequities in health has focused on the health disadvantage of the lower class. This is analogous to seeing social problems as particular to a disadvantaged minority, rather than a problem for society as a whole.

Table 3: The UK disease pattern by social group 1991-3, standardised rates per 100,000 for men aged 20-64.

Source: Acheson, 1997.

Marmots argument here is partly a reformulation of RH Tawneys famous comment that what thoughtful rich people call the problem of poverty, thoughtful poor people call with equal justice the problem of riches but it is more. The steeper the social gradient, not only the bigger the health gap between those at the top and those at the bottom, but also the lower the average position of all. The countries with the longest life expectancy are not the wealthiest but those with the smallest spread of income and the smallest proportion of the population in relative poverty. There is therefore a problem with thinking that because I am near the top in UK terms (and the level of inequality in the UK is one of the highest) I will live longer than someone at the bottom or in the middle. This is true. But it is also true that you would live longer still if society were more equal. It was realised in the 1990s that the mortality rate for the lowest social class in Sweden [with less inequality] is less than that for the top social class in the United Kingdom.

The narrow biomedical mechanism that produces this has three elements. The first is the psycho-social impact of pressure on bodily processes. This is socially determined. The second is our health behaviour and how we respond in terms of what we eat, whether we smoke and drink, take exercise, etc. This too is socially determined. The third is how supportive our family, friends and social networks are. This is also socially determined. Only then does the fourth issue, healthcare, become a central issue and, when it does, it too is socially determined.

If we look at our lifestyles as a whole, their patterns reflect either the accumulation of advantage or disadvantage. The story starts in the womb with fetal development, it is manifest in the early years, at primary and secondary school. It is then compounded by what type of job we get and how precarious our employment is, and so on. But why can this not be explained by people at the top choosing wisely and those at the bottom choosing badly?

The really interesting aspect of the social approach to health is how careful the analysis is of what conditions our behaviour. The cleverness of the Whitehall Studies of UK civil servants is a good example. The researchers took a large group in which the members appeared to be similar and apparently had some more positive elements in their work conditions. They then designed a study of how work, position, life, social situation, etc interacted and combined. This analysis allowed them to nail the myth that top managers are prone to more heart attacks because of pressure. They are not and we now know why. With responsibility comes status, power, control, means to relieve stress (membership of the gym, a night at the opera, a holiday villa) often arranged by your secretary and so on. As you move lower down, peoples lives become more bound up with lower status, less control and the need to battle and juggle a host of other commitments. It is the harassed worker on the shopfloor or in the office who is more at risk of a heart attack and, beneath them, the cleaner doing two jobs on the minimum wage. This also explains negative health behaviours and why these should give rise to different incidences of disease when the same immediate causal factors, eg smoking, appear to be present.

But some readers may be puzzling about a theoretical problem in the link between social class and the health gradient. Those who insist that we live in a class society have to defend themselves not only against those who deny the reality of class but also those who want to define it simply in terms of hierarchy. It is here that we run up against the fundamental weakness of the argument about social gradients in health. It is clear that they exist, but what causes them? What is the cause of the cause? To solve this problem we have to look behind the gradients and explore what determines the different incomes, jobs and degree of control that people have over their lives. This means that the central thing has to be class analysis and showing how any gradient is structured by ownership and control and not least, in capitalism, by ownership and control of the means of production.

Here several related concepts are absolutely central alienation, exploitation, class and class conflict. Inequalities are a consequence of how these interact and it is from this that social gradients and gradients of ill health flow. Marmot makes occasional gestures towards this but they are weak and inconsistent. The same is true of Wilkinson even though he has a more systematic grasp of the social side. To insist on the importance of this is not just about adding an additional layer of possibly superfluous explanation. It makes the argument stronger in terms of its logic and explanatory power, and it gives it a clearer political thrust because it also forces us to consistently address the political economy of both health causation and the limits of reform within the system.

Alienation, for example, is fundamental to explaining both our loss of control of social processes and the way that they are turned against us, and our resulting inability to relate to one another as proper human beings. Exploitation gives us the possibility of understanding how and why the rewards go to the few who make so little contribution to our real wealth. And class and class conflict help us to understand the resulting texture of social relationships and their antagonisms.

We can make these arguments work in a more precise fashion too. As organisations have become more powerful the argument arises about who has effective disposition of capital and labour within them. The key social argument here is that the more your position gives you control over capital and labour, control over yourself, your work, the work and lives of others, the lower the levels of ill health. The more your life is controlled by others the less the level of health. The social gradient is not simply about who has what but the capacity to command people and resources the very issue that is at the centre of class analysis.

But to take this analysis further we need people whose expertise is the analysis of capitalisms social structures to link up with the people whose expertise is in health and illness. One of the most creative ways of making the connection was set out nearly three decades ago by Eric Olin Wright. Wright took on the argument that class was disappearing in modern society because of the alleged explosion of groups in the middle. These groups appeared to stand between capital and labour; they had what he called contradictory class locations. He then devised a way of mapping these contradictions, focusing crucially on how much control of capital and labour they had. It becomes obvious in his analysis that these intermediate groups often have little and are therefore closer to labour than capital. This reflects what many of us understand intuitively: the badge may say manager but we all know that in reality it means some low-grade supervisory responsibilities that do not preclude trade union membership and even militancy.

Using these ideas to map how capitalism really operates and divides us has an obvious attraction for those seeking to more systematically underpin the analysis of health gradients, and some researchers have already looked in this direction. But heres the problem. Almost immediately Wright had set out this argument, he retreated under the pressure of the anti-class theorists. This has meant that it has fallen to others to defend this extension of class analysis as a way to understand capitalism. But it has also acted as a disincentive to use the argument to tighten the theoretical and empirical links between class and health.

But this argument raises other political issues and not least for the medical establishment. Prevention, as everyone knows, is better than cure. The most sophisticated and effective healthcare in the world cannot produce results as good as simply remaining healthy in the first place. But creating healthy societies and individuals largely results from action outside the health sector. Healthcare can never remove the gradients in causation, only deal with some of the consequences.

This type of argument is difficult to make. We are rightly appalled by inadequacies in healthcare but we tend to take for granted the inequalities in health causation. It is awful that when Julie had her heart attack in her 50s she had to wait 30 minutes for an ambulance; then there was the four-hour wait in accident & emergency and the dirty wards on which she eventually died. But the prior question is why she had a heart attack in her 50s and why Jane, who worked as a cleaner in the same office, had one a couple of years later and died before help could get there?

We need to take any argument about the role of medicine in health in two stages. The first is to stress the absolute importance of what is called primary prevention and not to fall into the trap of thinking that we can leave the causes of illness alone and focus on better treatment. Primary prevention saves lives but primary prevention may not involve medical measures in the narrow sense at all. Only three out of the 39 proposals made by the 1997 Acheson Report of the Inquiry into Inequalities in Health related directly to health service provision. If the problem is a choice between a worse treatment and a better one, we should obviously demand the better one. But the issue should not be about whether we can afford treatments but whether we can afford people to be ill. It is often said that medical costs will always rise. This is an absurd argument in itself because it ignores the way in which the drive for profit is behind the cost rises that exist. But even if it were true, reducing the numbers of ill people in the first place would reduce the cost problems. The less people that you have to treat, the more you can afford to spend on making those who have the genuine misfortune (and not the socially determined one) to fall ill. The real problem then is to alter the fundamentals of the generation of illness caused by class society.

Primary prevention is therefore politically challenging. There has always been a minority tendency in the medical establishment that links health improvement to real social reform, and within this group a smaller one still who continue to insist that so long as capitalism and class society exist we will remain trapped in unequal lives and unequal deaths. But many health professionals also see the immediate attraction of the medical fix. And so do we as patients once we get trapped in ill health. Even the members of the team that produced the original Black Report were split on this issue. According to Sir Douglas Black:

We were all agreed that education and preventative measures, specifically directed towards the socially deprived, were necessary. But the sociological members of the group considered that the consequent expenditure should be obtained by diversion from acute services. On the other hand the medical members felt that the acute services played a vital role in the prevention of chronic disability and could not be further cut back without serious effects on emergency care, on the training of doctors for both hospital work and for family practice and on the length of waiting lists. We spent a long time, without real success trying to resolve this matter.

This fudge is not enough. Consider the problem of mental ill health. Its burden continues to rise in the advanced world. There is a big question over whether the medical fix actually works. But suppose the evidence was clearer that it did. It would still not be enough for three reasons. First, it is inconceivable that enough professionals could be trained and employed to treat the many millions of casualties of our psychologically toxic social environment one at a time. Second, if the problem is the toxic environment then once people are returned to it their symptoms are likely to recur. Third, this approach does nothing to stop new cases appearing. But the same logic applies to other areas. Britain, for example, is acknowledged to have one of the poorest records in the advanced world for longer-term survival after major incidents like cancer and heart attacks. You can now guess that there may be two explanations for this. One is medical the weaknesses of early identification, treatment and follow up. The other is inequality. If inequality increases your chances of getting a life threatening disease, then however good the medical fix the pressure will be on again once you return to the environment that helped to cause the illness in the first place.

At this point, however, many take fright. It seems easier to imagine that the way forward is to work on medical solutions to ill health and demand more resources for these. But this takes us to the second issue of whether a health system run for profit can ever rationally answer human need. The answer is an unequivocal no. The first simple rule of healthcare is Tudor Harts inverse care law, which says that the availability of good medical care tends to vary inversely with the need for the population served [and this] operates more completely where medical care is most exposed to market forces. A national health system has to be based on principles of comprehensiveness, universality and equitability. Supply and demand, internal and external markets, subvert these principles and undermine the capacity of rational health planning. They even undermine the very sources of information which would make such planning possible. The result is variation in the coverage of basic services. With this comes a huge loss in real efficiency.

A second simple rule of healthcare then emerges: the more the logic of capitalism determines the supply of healthcare, the higher the costs, the larger the management layer, and the greater the diversion of resources away from treatment and care and into private hands. With this level of irrationality in the system we can then move to a third simple rule of healthcare: the more the logic of capitalism determines the supply of healthcare, the more the healthcare system itself may become a threat to social health.

Here is the original post:
From the Archive | Part two: Class, health and medicine - newframe.com

Read More...

How healthy are you, really? – 9Coach

Friday, May 29th, 2020

Heads up, ACT readers: According to a recent survey, your lifestyle is one of the healthiest in the country! In the inaugural AIA Vitality Wellbeing Index report, you score big on physical activity, you're non-smoking and you've ditched those sugary drinks. Take a flexible and well-hydrated bow.

For the rest of us, well it could be time for a friendly wake-up call, because the lifestyle choices we make now will contribute to our wellbeing long-term.

Lifestyle is often the driver of non-communicable diseases (think cardiovascular disease, diabetes, respiratory disease and cancer) which are responsible for 90 per cent of premature deaths in Australia and New Zealand and, according to the World Health Organization, may make you more susceptible to COVID-19.

The good news is that a bit of preventative healthcare can help. "Proactive preventative healthcare means taking small steps now to improve and maintain all aspects of your life," explains preventative health expert Dr Zac Turner.

"By having a lifestyle focus which considers the impact of exercise, diet, smoking and alcohol, it can enable great health outcomes."

While the ACT is ahead of the rest of the country with 18 per cent of the population meeting the physical activity guidelines, the recommended 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week is something we can all aim for.

Trainer and co-founder of Sydney's Flow Athletic, Ben Lucas, agrees. "A moderate intensity is an intensity that makes you work hard enough to burn off three to six times more energy per minute than when you are sitting," he says.

"Take a very brisk walk, ride a bike at a medium effort, do some light toning/strength training that doesn't involve the heaviest weights or some high intensity interval training."

Victoria tops the country on nutrition, the survey revealed, while NSW is all over the recommended daily fruit guidelines, and Tasmania has the most veggie eaters.

But it's not hard for every Australian to get on track. Integrative medicine practitioner Madeline Calfas says the biggest no-no is sugar, which can lead to health issues like diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure.

"The best way to ensure you truly have a healthy diet is to follow the J.E.R.F. protocol: Just Eat Real Food," she advises. "By minimisingfoods that don't come from a packet, you can not only avoid hidden sugars, but you are also avoiding preservatives and additives that can wreak havoc in our bodies."

Smoking? Stop, or at least start cutting down, says Dr Turner. "If you go from 20 a day to 13, then nine, to six and then three, for example, over a three-month period there will be a significant improvement in your health," he says. "If you stop all together, in five to seven years you will get your lungs back to a pre-smoking state."

As for how much is OK when it comes to your favourite tipple, lifetime alcohol guidelines say we shouldn't consume more than two standard drinks a day.

"Drinking every day, or binge drinking more than four standard drinks on one day, means that you are putting your body at risk of alcohol-related illness such as fatty liver disease, diabetes, heart disease and depression," explains Calfas.

"Also, try to reduce the number of sugary drinks and cocktails you consume it's not just the alcohol that's the issue here."

Got all that? Turns out this preventative health lark is actually quite straightforward.

"Yes," agrees Dr Turner. "It's really all about keeping healthy people healthy."

And that's important no matter where you live.

AIA, with AIA Vitality, is on a mission to get all Australians making the small changes they need to become the healthier version of themselves. Head to aia.com.au/onelife for more healthy-living inspiration.

Original post:
How healthy are you, really? - 9Coach

Read More...

What quarantine was like in 1947: the fascinating story of the Middle East’s cholera outbreak – The National

Friday, May 29th, 2020

The coronavirus pandemic may seem to be on a scale the Middle East has not seen before and in many ways, it is.

But the world and the region is no stranger to outbreaks of disease.

In fact, the UAE's first brush with a potential large-scale epidemic may have been in 1947, the year cholera tore through Egypt, Iraq and Syria, and arrived in Dubai, then part of the Trucial States, which was under British rule at the time.

The disease caused panic among the British, who put people into quarantine, grounded flights, sent for huge stocks of vaccines from London and went door-to-door to ensure people were inoculated against infection.

Because of the 1947 scare, the country was well equipped to address the outbreak

Sara Farhan, historian

It was this outbreak that caused some of the first examples of large-scale border closures, travel restrictions, quarantine, contact tracing and flight groundings.

And while the two diseases are very different (cholera is a bacterial infection that is transmitted via excrement in water, and Covid-19 is a respiratory illness transmitted by infected people or surfaces), the method in which outbreaks were dealt with 73 years ago provide a fascinating insight into how our healthcare has both developed, and remained the same.

The National has studied the 228-page report, A Outbreak of Cholera in the Trucial Coast, held by the British Library, and worked with a historian to determine how this could have informed the response to the 2020 pandemic.

"This is a lesson of how early state mitigation can prevent an outbreak," Sara Farhan, assistant professor of history and medicine historian at the American University of Sharjah, says.

"The scare prompted local officials to embark on an inoculation campaign, invest in advancing the health apparatus of their sheikhdoms, and ensure that should an outbreak occur, they would be adequately prepared to address it promptly and swiftly."

In September 1947, Egypt was experiencing a cholera outbreak that had yielded 20,804 cases and 10,277 deaths a staggering 50 per cent mortality rate. The epidemic went on to reach Syria, and neighbouring countries such as Iraq and Palestine. August 1947 was also when India was partitioned; during which, a devastating cholera outbreak killed millions across India and Pakistan.

This was all of great concern to the British, who wielded great influence over Egypt through its proprietorship of the Suez Canal, and were wary of the country's proximity to the Arabian Gulf and its trade routes. They feared that an outbreak in the Trucial States was only a matter of time.

"In the aftermath of the Second World War, British troops were in India, Iraq, Egypt, and the Trucial States to name a few. The connection between these areas facilitated a marvellous exchange of vibrant culture, people and ideas. These interactions also facilitated the communication of diseases," Farhan says.

"Cholera outbreaks emerged in the 19th century and quickly reached pandemic status through increased communication and improved transportation."

Much the same as Covid-19, cholera spread quickly through trade and ports, and caused economic and agricultural devastation.

The first case of cholera arrived in Dubai on November 4, 1947. In a letter, the residency agent of Sharjah informed the political agent in Bahrain of a case of cholera and two suspected deaths from the disease.

Immediately, demands were made to find out the patient's movements for the past 10 days, as well as their contacts. It was then requested that anyone the cholera patients had come into contact with, as well as the patient themselves, be isolated.

So, could this have been a very early form of contact tracing?

Perhaps, says Farhan. But it was also an instant and aggressive measure by the Brits to stymie the disease, as they "anticipated an outbreak similar to that reported in Egypt".

In Dubai, the report of the infected case outlined a servant dying after vomiting and purging. "He looked dried up," it says.

People who had come into contact with the deceased were moved to another house on the outskirts of the city.

"Under the circumstances, Dubai and Sharjah must be considered as infected localities and necessary quarantine restrictions imposed," the report says. "Till the contrary is proved by the non occurrence of further cases for a period of at least three weeks."

The next day, a letter to Bahrain outlined the fact the Trucial States had "limited resources to counter the outbreak" and a request was made for quarantine medical officer, Captain MLA Steele, to be permitted to fly to Sharjah by RAF plane "immediately".

In the following days, 20,000 cases of the cholera vaccine were sent for from Sharjah to London and a request was made that "inoculation is energetically carried out".

Quarantine efforts and border closures across the Arabian Gulf came quickly afterwards.

On November 6, Iraq closed its borders to travellers from India, Pakistan and the Arabian Gulf.

In Kuwait, travellers arriving from Egypt were quarantined for six days.

"The main reason for the isolation of Kuwait and Bahrain from Iraq is fear that travellers may leak through from Egypt without undergoing quarantine," a letter dated November 14, says.

"A case of America Oil Company employees who went to Kuwait from Egypt by air, stayed there, 'passed a day or two' and then flew on to Baghdad where they did not reveal they had recently been in Egypt and stayed at a hotel in quarantine."

Later, as guidelines were updated, the residency agent in Sharjah was instructed to stop all passenger traffic by dhows or steamer heading to Bahrain. Boats from Karachi and Bombay were ordered to have cholera inoculation certificates.

The scare led to the inoculation of a quarter of the populations of Sharjah and Dubai a cost-effective measure to dealing with the alternative a devastating cholera outbreak

Other travellers were warned they may suffer four days' delay "due to steamers being placed in quarantine at the entrance of the [Iraqi] port".

Cholera inoculation certificates were later introduced as mandatory for other countries.

"The policies were indicative that local officials were specifically isolating areas where there was a cholera outbreak Syria, Pakistan, India and Iraq," Farhan says.

And even 1947 wasn't immune from misinformation. As we are experiencing on social media amid the coronavirus outbreak, it isn't always easy to tell fact from fiction.

On November 8, Bahrain's political agent sent a seemingly contradictory report to all agents in the area, saying there was no cholera outbreak in Dubai as there was "bacteriological proof lacking".

"As a precaution Dubai is being treated as cholera infected and preventative measures are being taken," the same report says.

"The only means at our disposal of suppressing the epidemic is preventative inoculation and to try his best to inoculate every resident in Dubai."

Doctors then went door-to-door vaccinating the city's residents.

But to confuse matters further, at the same time, authorities in Dubai and in Bahrain were alerted to a report by the BBC that had "specifically mentioned Dubai as the port at which cholera had broken out". Questions abounded as to where the erroneous information had come from.

A report at the time from Sharjah to Bahrain reads: "The news about cholera was not sent by anyone from the Trucial Coast to BBC. On the 4th of November, the Officer Commanding, Royal Air Force, Sharjah, wired to Royal Air Force Headquarters informing them of the outbreak of cholera in Dubai as reported to him by the Medical Officer and it is very likely that the Royal Air Force or others passed on the information to BBC."

Farhan says this announcement "puzzled local health officials as only three cases were recorded and a handful of suspected cases."

"Nonetheless, local officials quickly adopted the policies of neighbouring countries. Sharjah grounded the Royal Air Force, and limited entry into the country."

Daily case counts were also enforced, much the same as they are today.

This came after a dressing down for the Bahrain resident from his counterpart in Kuwait on November 14 for his tardiness: "A report three days old is useless. I require an up-to-date daily telegraph report until Trucial Coast is officially declared free from infection."

Case counts were then sent each day.

Farhan says "it really forced local authorities to adopt preventive measures".

"The scare led to the inoculation of a quarter of the populations of Sharjah and Dubai a cost-effective measure to dealing with the alternative a devastating cholera outbreak."

Subsequent daily reports from Sharjah to Bahrain outlined zero new cases until November 21, two weeks after the first case.

That was the day Iraq relaxed its quarantine restrictions and resumed some flights, except its Cairo to Baghdad route.

Dhows from Bahrain, Kuwait and the Arabian Gulf were once more allowed to enter Iraq's Shatt Al Arab port after a traveller underwent one stool (faecal) examination. This was also on the understanding crew and passengers had been twice inoculated against cholera.

After another week of zero cases, as promised, Dubai relaxed its quarantine restrictions and Iraq relaxed all border restrictions.

However, people coming from Egypt were still required to undergo a stool examination and quarantine for six days.

In the end, the 1947 cholera outbreak in the Trucial States amounted to 12 suspected and three confirmed cases.

So how was a more sinister outbreak avoided? After all, this occurred a year before the World Health Organisation was formally founded, which put in place a more streamlined way of combatting and tracking infectious diseases.

Shortly after the inauguration of the WHO, all participating countries were required to report disease outbreaks, which were later published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record.

And it wasn't for another year, on January 1, 1949, that streamlined instructions for travellers arriving into the Trucial Coast were laid out.

"The scare in the Trucial States led to the delivery of a surplus of anti-cholera remedies as well as the inoculation of a quarter of the local population. It also led to the expansion of the public health apparatus," Farhan says.

"By 1949, the Trucial States began to take serious measures to advance its health apparatus. Hospitals, clinics, as well as vaccination policies and health protocols were implemented."

And the healthcare system in the region continued to be tested. Also in January 1949, Bahrain experienced a smallpox outbreak, which resulted in another contact tracing and quarantine drive.

So, could the 1947 cholera outbreak have informed our response to 2020's Covid-19 pandemic? It certainly laid the foundations for our healthcare system and large-scale disease outbreak response.

And lessons learnt in 1947 certainly stymied a pandemic situation 23 years later.

Farhan points to August 1970, when another cholera outbreak reached the Trucial States.

"Because of the 1947 scare, the country was well equipped to address the outbreak," she says.

Much has changed in the past 73 years. The UAE's healthcare system has rapidly developed and modernised. But our basic response remains the same. Perhaps, 70 years from now, we will be looking back to the Covid-19 response as the event that shaped our response to the next pandemic. Because there will be another one.

Updated: May 29, 2020 04:19 PM

See the original post:
What quarantine was like in 1947: the fascinating story of the Middle East's cholera outbreak - The National

Read More...

Treating rebound headaches with early preventative meds best choice, study finds – Henry Herald

Wednesday, May 27th, 2020

Your head is pounding yet again. You grab another round of pain meds, only to find they no longer work.

You may be suffering from a MOH -- a medication overuse headache -- brought on when the very medications you relied on for relief suddenly become the enemy.

Some 60 million people around the world suffer from headaches brought on by the overuse of medication. It typically happens to people who suffer from migraines, cluster headaches or tension-type headaches who are using medications that don't work.

When the pain doesn't ease, they take another pill, thus setting the scene for what is often known as a "rebound" headache.

Instead of a headache that might call for pain medications two or three times a week, people with MOH now have a headache nearly every day, typically upon awakening. For many, this is a new level of chronic pain -- and there's no miracle pill to fix it.

Is cold turkey best?

Withdrawal therapy is currently the only treatment for this disorder, sometimes combined with physical or behavioral therapy and preventative medicine treatments, sometimes called "bridge therapies."

Those preventative medicine treatments include anticonvulsants, antidepressants, beta blockers and calcium channel blockers that might help control withdrawal pain without risking medication overuse headaches. At times a patient may be given injections of Botox or antibodies designed to thwart migraines.

But not always. In Denmark, for example, guidelines suggest a complete withdrawal, totally discontinuing any pain medications for two months before other options are provided.

"Withdrawal has been recommended for years in European Guidelines, including the most recent published from May 2020," said Dr. Rigmor Jensen, a professor of headache and neurological pain who directs the Danish Headache Center at the University of Copenhagen, and is lead author on a new study to see if those recommendations were right.

In fact, doctors have long debated whether any preventative treatments were necessary to help patients wean off medications -- believing the vast majority of patients did just as well with a cold-turkey approach.

After all, most withdrawal headaches tend to improve in less than a week, although some patients did need to be hospitalized, especially if they were withdrawing from opioids.

"In placebo-controlled studies for preventive treatment, the effect has been modest," Jensen said. "So, we decided to compare these treatment strategies directly in this study to clarify the question."

Jensen and his coauthors hypothesized that withdrawal alone, or withdrawal with preventatives, would work better in reducing overall headache days per month than a preventative approach.

However, the results of their study, published Tuesday in the journal JAMA Neurology, surprised the authors.

While all three treatments were effective in reducing MOH, the largest reductions in headache and migraine days, days with short-term medication use and days with headache pain intensity were seen in the withdrawal plus preventive medicine group.

In addition, people who withdrew from meds with the help of preventatives had a significantly higher chance of being cured of their medication overuse headaches than patients who used preventatives or withdrawal alone.

"We were surprised of the study results and the excellent adherence to the treatment," Jensen said. "We now recommend withdrawal and early start of preventive treatment."

"Having good medical evidence to support the common practice of both stopping the offending agent or agents, and starting a patient on prevention medication right away, will clear up some of the controversy and confusion," said Dr. Rachel Colman, director of the Low-Pressure Headache Program at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.

Doctors should use this study to "provide patients with guidance, support and hopefully relief from a disabling condition," said Coleman, who was not involved in the study and is a member of the National Headache Foundation Health Care Professionals Leadership Council.

Coleman also pointed out that due to timing of the trial, the study did not include the newest options for prevention, called CGRP monoclonal antibodies, that have become available in the last two years. These are a new class of medication created specifically for migraine headaches.

However, Jensen said that going "cold-turkey" may still have some benefits for patients, especially those with less severe rebound headaches. Prior studies have found that when patients feel their actions exert control over their headaches, it can help them from overusing medications in the future.

"Patients who withdraw completely experience that a headache can disappear by itself, and that experience is important when talking about preventing relapse into a new medication overuse," Jensen said.

What causes a MOH?

Just how much pain medication will cause a rebound headache depends on the medicine.

According to the American Migraine Foundation, over-the-counter pain relievers, such as aspirin, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, naproxen and indomethacin, can cause MOH when used 15 or more days per month.

It will only take about 10 days of use for medications that combine caffeine, aspirin and acetaminophen to contribute to a MOH. Ten days is also the max for tryptamine- and ergotamine-based drugs often prescribed for migraines, as well as any of the opiates: oxycodone, tramadol, butorphanol, morphine, codeine or hydrocodone.

Just 200 milligrams of coffee will also trigger a medication overdose headache. That's just one cup of coffee combined with a coke and a plain chocolate bar.

It's not just pain in the head either. Often MOH can cause memory issues, difficulty concentrating, depression, anxiety, irritability, restlessness and nausea.

Now, more than ever, the world needs trustworthy reportingbut good journalism isnt free.Please support us by subscribing or making a contribution today.

Here is the original post:
Treating rebound headaches with early preventative meds best choice, study finds - Henry Herald

Read More...

Letter to the editor: Can they hate Trump any more? – TribLIVE

Wednesday, May 27th, 2020

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to ourTerms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sentvia e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

Read more here:
Letter to the editor: Can they hate Trump any more? - TribLIVE

Read More...

Leading Thrombosis Specialists Issue Clinical Guidance on the Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients…

Wednesday, May 27th, 2020

CHAPEL HILL, N.C., May 27, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --Leading thrombosis specialists from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis(ISTH) and World Thrombosis Day(WTD) Steering Committee recommend administering either standard preventative or larger doses of heparin (blood thinning medicine) to combat excessive clotting in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients from the time of hospital admission, unless they have contraindications to those medications.

This proposed "universal" intervention strategy is a change from the current practice of using only preventative levels of such medications after individual venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment of hospitalized patients.

The recommendations are published in a new paper, titled "Clinical Guidance on the Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19," published on May 27, 2020 in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH). The peer-reviewed paper outlines new practical guidance on the prevention and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

The recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary panel of thrombosis experts as a response to widespread clinical reports of unusual, difficult-to-control clotting in COVID-19 patients."Early reports suggest COVID-19 is one of the most thrombotic disease states we've ever seen," said lead author Alex Spyropoulos, M.D., member of the WTD Steering Committee. Co-authors include leading scientists from six countries (see below for list).

In issuing new guidance, the authors analyzed reports from colleagues around the world who observed that patients hospitalized with COVID-19 had a high incidence of thrombotic events (blood clots). The authors caution that the data are based on anecdotal reporting rather than rigorous scientific research. Thus, guidance may change as data improves, though the scientists generally agree the recommendations are sufficiently supported to be adopted into practice.

"We consider this a living document," Spyropoulos said. "This is a very fast-moving target. The data are important, but even more important is our need to take care of patients now. We see this correlation with clotting, and we must act."

"In the United Kingdom, we are seeing high rates of blood clots in our patients even as they receive standard doses of blood thinners," said Professor Beverley Hunt, M.D., OBE, WTD Steering Committee Chair. "These patients seem to need larger doses than other sick patients. We need to know the best doses going forward."

Additional research is in development in the UK at this time, via a clinical trial named REMAP-CAP, to capture the response of COVID-19 patients to different dosing levels of blood thinning medications. This will provide more guidance for healthcare professionals globally, Hunt said.

While much remains unknown, the authors have concluded that patients with severe cases of COVID-19 develop VTE at a much higher rate than severely ill patients in general. VTE is a condition in which blood clots form (most often) in the deep veins of the leg (known as deep vein thrombosis or DVT), and can travel in the circulation to lodge in the lungs (known as pulmonary embolism, or PE). The development of this condition in hospitalized COVID-19 patients results in a much higher risk of death, particularly in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease.

COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are three to six times more likely to experience DVT than a patient in ICU for some other reason, such as congestive heart failure.

The authors also noted that the clots exhibit particular characteristics. Clots that lead to cardiac events, such as heart attacks and strokes, are typically large. In COVID-19 patients, however, in addition to the usual large clots seen in these patients, smaller clots (microthrombi) are also present in the lungs.

Clinicians have not identified a specific cause of blood clotting in COVID-19 patients, but believe it is due to the extreme immune response to COVID-19 that causes very sticky blood. Early research on COVID-19 found that blood clots are playing a role in a significant percentage of all COVID-19 deaths in the United States. Patients in the United States, however, are not routinely given blood thinners, in contrast to patients in the United Kingdom.

For more information on the paper, "Clinical Guidance on the Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19," visit https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111/jth.14929.

Co-authors include: Jerrold H. Levy (United States), Walter Ageno (Italy), Jean Marie Connors (United States), Beverley J. Hunt (United Kingdom), Toshiaki Iba (Japan), Marcel Levi (United Kingdom), Charles Marc Samama (France), Jecko Thachil (United Kingdom), Dimitrios Giannis (United States), and James D. Douketis (Canada)

SOURCE International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

http://www.isth.org

Read more here:
Leading Thrombosis Specialists Issue Clinical Guidance on the Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients...

Read More...

Drug Touted by Trump as COVID-19 Treatment Tied to Increased Risk of Death: Study – The New York Times

Wednesday, May 27th, 2020

(Reuters) - The anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine, which U.S. President Donald Trump says he has been taking and has urged others to use, was tied to an increased risk of death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, a large study published on Friday showed.

In the study https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/article/s0140673620311806 that looked at more than 96,000 people hospitalized with COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus, those treated with hydroxychloroquine or the related chloroquine had higher risk of death and heart rhythm problems than patients who were not given the medicines.

The study, published in the Lancet medical journal, showed no benefit for coronavirus patients taking the drugs.

Demand for the decades-old hydroxychloroquine has surged as Trump repeatedly promoted its use against the coronavirus, urging people to try it. "What have you got to lose?" he asked.

Trump said this week he has been taking hydroxychloroquine as a preventative medicine despite a lack of scientific evidence.

The Lancet study authors suggested that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine should not be used to treat COVID-19 outside of clinical trials until studies confirm their safety and efficacy in such patients.

There is a frantic search for drugs to treat COVID-19 at the same time that multiple research teams pursue a safe and effective vaccine to combat a pathogen that has killed more than 335,000 people worldwide and sickened millions more.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has allowed healthcare providers to use the drugs for COVID-19 through an emergency-use authorization, but has not approved them to treat it.

Dr. Mandeep Mehra, one of the study's authors, said the research shows that the FDA should withdraw that authorization.

"That will help move this towards more, stronger evidence because it will then force the use of these drugs only in the setting of control trials," Mehra said in an interview. "That would be an extremely wise decision."

The FDA has said that, for safety reasons, hydroxychloroquine should be used only for hospitalized COVID-19 patients or those in clinical trials. The drug has been tied to dangerous heart rhythm problems.

The Lancet study looked at data from 671 hospitals where 14,888 patients were given either hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, with or without an antibiotic, and 81,144 patients were not given such treatments.

Both drugs have shown evidence of effectiveness against the coronavirus in a laboratory setting, but studies in patients had proven inconclusive. Several small studies in Europe and China spurred interest in using hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19, but were criticized for lacking scientific rigor.

Several more recent studies have not shown the drug to be an effective COVID-19 treatment. Last week, two studies published in the medical journal BMJ showed that patients given hydroxychloroquine did not improve significantly over those who were not.

Hydroxychloroquine is used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis as well as malaria.

Hospitalized patients tend to have a more severe version of COVID-19. Some proponents of the drugs for COVID-19 argue that they may need to be administered at an earlier stage to be effective.

There are ongoing randomized, controlled clinical trials to study the drug's effectiveness in preventing infection by the coronavirus as well as treating mild to moderate COVID-19. Some of those may yield results within weeks.

(Reporting by Ankur Banerjee and Manas Mishra in Bengaluru and Michael Erman in New York; Editing by Saumyadeb Chakrabarty, Bill Berkrot, Jonathan Oatis and Will Dunham)

Original post:
Drug Touted by Trump as COVID-19 Treatment Tied to Increased Risk of Death: Study - The New York Times

Read More...

Page 22«..10..21222324..3040..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick