header logo image


Page 46«..1020..45464748..»

Archive for the ‘Longevity’ Category

Financing longevity – The Economist

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

X[o~_j$)Vym/7MvGjB8ZL]nv&'{MSYY%v{ON'q!BB6fC,Wru=gKt}1.=GU'hD;>AMQ""q%xK;J Z8t VP"shrFBZKR6.}NjQ!{h6>+}[gD4Xl#&}v+jCppD*d JYZV0%o08*DnhE*v%G7k1NBpKk~PJKFDv$gA OfMqb5de+No"]Kf4Av1it{'ctGQW7-len+L=7Cz;Xl*!{5.]h,z2aY,%}x3:.!;6} FmcR`pFFgF_E0:fEns~GUput3%:'_Wgp6%P]np ;x"@(aa,-;Gxl+m}~D{6^xB08 h,SVjj#4?@-d]3P!?J[qeNF ^5xq`rOM,a(xIdQzraA1B0VoOWm=6 Qv~;cK8 |^*[ng>A>EE@eQDP sJr LEBGZf*c"{bxuLk1QI3DA`N,N( %i`(2Xg8TlxqL"s"fEe^'#AM3c(z; ITY(:ADdQB" :2D2A21`'qyUTJ!"tF:,B"T)siT<7^)LYqBB$ iy&{7aB"2L8o~Gp0 Qf,Yu7m. !JPrzjB5%bDGGj*q4x&(;(BTf{;g)r7 ILcXHvu iW8FU5ZQt|BTcSJ J-xw n/v]p&KF`[je1YOj:EpX A^p,#td(7mEa&Q09`>mOk#WNI<l^ 8?%pa"MAV`f LJ-UY gjg04/&BVaT!5HD*| j:y89B^TMk9`U'K':!'vlX?`/t %vuY%C&tM _z-z/k9{D4/,h<={=f2cPa2DEV4'!o'0L'DGQRh+oL/<;3: [vx`a>]_`~!smuZtznOF?F~o.Lmj`n?&}bywM_U]}:7U?v^gv6oG}qOmbw@;w0Gjn: ++73+/1*Dh/'6SOy?'4V 8=zz"F {?r=5/x]s8poNB'ZmfN )C?;Aoni$%Y%YN6v'|m/! ;p7'3J/q );'8|qC/ <1Oi{4v|=q3ZkKMx6m'p}>hChDi"m:kC;zq N#;Z'u/Vl{,?l9-_<Pv"NkOSxE;jh9I:%zsV=O:G[G-1K/y}[AM+wk$_G>tPqnMfxCX{Aw KwOtKjHY#t/]C>ENhlM>7,% n5t.GK;)gOaK:u<^mC=_^`?UiMUPa0N3h6^ Mw0~ZoH~S5;q1qw6O|ZnZ,$fuNH+q^B15z $UP2N3u2?mU:05fJ0>4f8!odpRk?LjFdSMAX^B:*'MD?'V:$9_V]*N]$68CyG.Yjl.]r0zHU[L%xu2vW$D.IEl/Kq-GFXT[$+@|!@@{Nu/ e5mb1[|q%D,s>A5'uuKH5 L%ceBv jE?z )UhzwF btlkVODO`wAV1;cx6 U6aZ22GK)s5AN(`C== [APh ^QgI9SL[ighp->f7F_rGWMaUBXg jiN=$ `<}> WVo6C-~<~*jDC/qa_O 36Se_^~]~vO3Y"m H]VcZsX GU4r1M[:'m:Q.R.&$)h[SE%1g9deROKsFxo;Q-_RA 3VrMk4DZH/K?Q*sl~'0OLap-'b" vF0GL6'A{ne~FQw}, X(e2rQ[D)~gMq<@ }"siO#E9g,ZF|RJJ7q]w2Myk'&AS0O-Z_2{D6v C]n0~@,B/;^Mb8mOe #Ij@>7/Lo,#,I#-",%n^0U @@V[Je]IxXY{7^+ >0S_UIY,M*ctqQ)P`rMA:*F%VR@ Hc6"8 TT.(f(PLd6"98>& |rFO<_}c/99H$G QN~D21 );`nhR4hFuCLtt[MDzvd3Mj02doE)d^}o,gB]#[J!(?fa)[oVH_M23Lo'%Iwn1'%) w @B_F>0%F`;%x$s:}G]0S2a6f@-JqZ 4*7&jSp6UqAb +-_$8 kY gJT(_/m>t `e.[~F] z5-5/EFP#F~mVv C?Ex^;tIg 3?5daCcUAh"gvWu FF;LWWzvfbU{1j5{gp}H`rR]Rs 0lN.nB ,C~ZB24prszLU5PafaCzokStIi2'fQ4HOL V=!%K$>VEN-}[B"|[8~(9I H KgH&Q $$5BGK!%@@BXZ;RzgX4|TW>%<3Rhc|*$"4hb*$A@ G #^Q8@! 4nO[o6p3LIj{C~-TY(Q`9n }/ Nt!%Q%A&v9z!_b@xAzUySGkqdfo?wc#u(:.#8E-_wvyi.}P~(J6h5,`S_'JyVo{ 7QO^T;7/-Y1dsnH9:r*=%y# 3GtB1rt2a9Dp(dc,:,C82Q|{pA|MP;IBH&PiC&7(tQ"fs-r,WEeK_n.MYG 0v]b*,L_T(0hcDME8=} ?=oK| zNWT)?S,{`aNT$Ng3CJSpmEz5ZsOfc;!OH(k }0y`iT9WP1Z0[k4VukMU||i.0r]%ij^1g%R(w+N%UcX+qj}b8g}ro7Omu4RcI ~mEH"m&zsxx4ms#KCUMQm}q5^r:|m>,_lh)C-A^^EEoaj/Z"5C[+cUA{'Fbpj-k%FVh(ADkz;v>n:s|{wjdq`/SOPx}]em-nrvSh4Xh eb?Uf?W7Br""Y;e4w` wv}^F& *e^m'OF.[_XSLOuG9P?3O-EQ gLGe:3"#2=LYK"]),}D&wRi#`LT"`b%K)[N4NgSOM?~$?h6Gfs h6GeC')oNynoW(Tf!S!,7}>@%(kcE),1@#BPX;|~c=t$b!k62[|=R0Fdg;Sl-HG-m~Rf"$(U*W|N'Vp?b{B]z=*D#C*)qeXRHC()N60{,,`?@QgxF54%O$n>&&)7#w]/pHG9G66OlNlE?9 qi{m Ji[A^/(s!]i1=:.tA9&t$2:&'#OuZQnp{SCUl?I"LI,BQS#a1>bv62>9}x9%d|2h|~aQ9zR|UdeP{q N11uCY`|2 '.9sctl:CJ0x2?N*b"f/P!;I-CoJfuHN~8iWl7s*OoF}!LjO_5)5]r8]n s[7ga:COZ0ohQi9>bj(9]CXsgY4LL+vcE-v:cpL.20=MM,12a^=M3 ij%*g@5 jW Z~cn)aN@IF}Q)vAeS&( G5nDoeN*sN}O-$nkrTh|,%t&xdBYX-3awhX]Y1/0xWN_O0 Vh3]S-e6|J3hy|ou8%geFXPW+L;iY6 LQl:$rBP=n/d'u@u=qI6@E ~}s[q5|[$l>:ske,b[f6 +c?9e,ewn3r AVhn"Radm+IXP"B9!z#k$MWoDvgdeClG(wu>X8#'1H36%8F(t2Qs/"VsScb0t$:3+S YA M~rXEvE`~UW I21y|}vp17;0zQ>qJ5O` #x9w?poWd#EX[dRfcC?kb!V?|F~eV'uw0 j,6!Pee%@0'lE38kWjqLs XyWk0+'<$c'ad*:{8jg$4B3@>)vC!6%5gK"~OzDxe|1Cv'P Xx%zR;*oJj~<{Kl]9g}1}' ~K+''}.z=k>[j[;~9G]|?M&~Gm3{?6,xdaBHy1Q`Xg@U<;Y92lMMNj6mDheu~uP#yKaAW`tYw6^(T@:VEI RIjVr)3@5W._dP|-T{RD@il ETe+im/nx97a &T%qpxaf7)f&yr$/!aZ+4p%Y*5$Fr3NIz#I)z0h[)(Kq H U."Fts),]Quat7 H6!Lx_]uS?mEW4*Soc'/&qOT$.6mmXsCmQD8O6;HC+N>xOU^,tYc)@5v_FF(C|fi>$g5Gxk@ZaB:` VxB!oEFm8z" K5E8$4[!;gVdNS(#j6) /sV&^zieSiKD]=wPQZ*:QRj`r')^S5H#)h^v}~b'W*O0J2}>Q_uxI<=[8UV wzuW`_~)x_jJ&*$AkxfEZ|#xF7RXAd@CX?An6Dh")`Dq'09^}30cOMVvwS?YD5(G CB;/ on?TJM<@R9|R{'Ak1VRO7tY/bZ>m*c?sh^VY9Pb[aL,pU W5M'CN&yE1D)2*{0-V boQhiO.l:h3l|Rl&nwOV"i[3 ak*2?z4:TKM,lTY_=u62oj@_6R3R(1 drCA90 B.loc[oQT"[@UGPD)0IKE2RVZyXZT)Rs N4E;E*^@w<>[Hz~Am?J27|fO^/Rha#QT&da#}(4Jc[8p #Bv:d0u7!%]"):y/*8&]bOT!d&|+NKw'%d[JXJY|93Lq'DyIK-k|03jT?a'L]UHK[#f6!(;}d9ZA~*-:yZW9Z_Y6nlzF;1Ir9xxgi_"&XKU=3:ZfN]G3A3jiz2j98gyxmJ%q$+s@,Az$.7 xhjp)*Dmq!uk,wBt3bb8mMv'Aqyk#o[8MXq.8-h;YW(l8:0~FX5'9^YI4iSt&) &YKs7#%]:BHU'oBCs,r4u"8G0'o3Bp1{ss6PsX=%s=X@VbOifl`:Z,aByUKWwglR0tb~Z+Zf1pyWWs 07 &przR|gL=h~[x,Twb|s`}7W'j#G_E/b4!a@Z5YX"[>TWGn2 if8BAzV2.o4b;@k+7#Ek>3=f|'A>qjK6Im |g_:]vog-Smb@?]e(0W4HwY3_UEMF SzfF%yR>7!) u5@&7aV>)}J5gpB0)!FU BK]3AD-VbSlH3GVUAajq4 2 9_IBhg&8x/h?L}huVy6k"CeK(i+hyB:leU}-gSy$DE$f(}[&0<,C";R#foLPn5{b 0' Mm#$F7go+sB[0Hj?,LwrMZWUKnG> 4|x./|C.b7V.5)77B##<{{JavgF>sfHM4]Y9Q~|hgQ1nO^fu+_f 3AR#K-_&g7kA08=YW4~ KX^YO4Omms! sE^[1Ul0Y'qb*BM.b)T( 1OgGs`.TQ6 [L4J6:An&ftg:V9xV%%*MK8DPQ$E}sof^uD-cLPvDUe[HX1VDh Vf0Kel5ZB)C1D N!bRK"S-(qJ}o@)`F|qB1gRK>3MLJxGgEw_7ROaZClI=arHU>"/HY%2h4HJ#D.j/A ("?Iw"7nE< VUT &Z>WQ_K.?*"^!wMbE%^~7gZ)C=Wk j%cPx786HP!]M _Q)-XeC|evz6,|B3, 'Pur~A; ~;9h.r7Xm[tuQ6Io SLKXpK+OX'1~?+anXG;9,BxGT>1/W=aWjLq-2j::|_$|640Kq_t!qlC1-_O{WEGezli=j#Ux,%$pg+fC97#63y'8Pn8ldr]{-VahUG~F_-8zHi&I$} y*w^Hl2.Yvt|grFk>}%,hY&w$Y;0d22V(S}8FX=+rM;+++% aX5xDZ"VO;mw"_;BU9+LWS8sJ>|P x!&; W22HDp[ Y?&vLg;mX0C_-d!oT.(@?`]A:. ;s6#zN?Tfcf B*UfeUXtnTOx9aE^uZ"Juz5."r&h5@in=BAtN8Q=~l&r^~oA*Z?taUB:kv2w"XG9UbFAVJ8RyC>l _W7WdV EcHAK(M[,y&KE4afWjlQY$8(@6U,Aep(3fMn,tZ5oQI H.*2U:Pf rD+d`MbwO`;9saK_)M=Rd:f bha_Es^rl8PC-AC1>r36DV'~1}LgKW|.a^pF//}{2;cylG :/n a=R^0elNGoZ&kelkE47Wj&Nez-,9At 4Eh`l6W p546enAKre?Po[][:KpxJ;JPbEdfpk'U

FLE@Dvmnom7nm31t`=VvUh{}HvE}B?f}m=>;Zy[mu95bMB1c_+D*Vbd)!

\VmXA5ZW7!TMl6eWq6Se`}pqj=';&2YH0ob@jEu74=9a-/ `W+.dhW{_).&x,qVp=#JWI> H_I,[5LNkr z.FLBXH}sCjE8 H%{|BIdX1;-~v2/[X:JzKu+u&VX=fm37`DQy4' #UH$`8 G BAoFvik279RyDo9Ds}!A|9QZr]3 pD|Pxr0eG;pW_8@LY~]1bXb.QHbnELH2D% UAd2kPMS3w'yN7@{^,Wd-[4G`NjW3"J_ zd~2{"I8J4daA4Q5::yB|TzQ"PXgTJ0zU#:;|Yr_B&,hGXAfY& DBNFPz5z&"rYlo 9TKx!y*B@n|*g!J^Kse]aC7Vy$6Ea7 =j.'5vZeJ i}^|>cgxMJfUkyGeSD*):)c`QLe?W |htS ~bl@eB|iVj:4~N"$eVR2n4s-wtSy5rK+^b -Q@!UDTA&D PKB'k!M^VWrDN-*C)Y%npA7mzZY W#IjRf '/vl4#Fltp{0Qag9qO]5?WrU)-PvW'hh%W'UT3mB!l%~QBWmes 'ebF(H j aRQf Uzc07EX%GIh~ntAc~;We ha/6Z 1;4%>!.GaSwX#`"An4uoS4`F1"+S0Oa~95NFV!t9SFA9nDbqF;Q9]U ooI8 mnYRp[Wj]@q)K#6nD By_3a~ Z4".y3mM.wbAzx^/M#u+cRnIXU}'KT`APyH3]Tr!){D h/d8;B*qPGBal>b3~h6`UK6!YdVD|rR`8ZiXQ | FaV>X RbwtIJJ:#M-:FTCF~@ $X.E0pLH' V'A(DE?7!Rl1 >uacykC2&(U(^&kHX@mXi1Ie)Y8%zm/+Mhb"L9dap,`HdI&(ux&0TL+5|.e

IJ'P-F/ZX`3b`G(43K"%`3l@#Rk,:@;LeG2vU0e fPxRRbe;F{l%C1K@V O//J2iB*(&J?D!J,Egg!V2MB`K-;G|{2NfLo27F1+i_*2&X 2WAOtw*K~$./sNa(ao^%hVg(;_[`E@^KBX.bS}9S3xs;A.H`wBv @%Pt}E(6jl. 7rBiU4qilY`oxJiwBxencXng5aIdWU Lx|.7kW@r#b7Wyjq546m*;qM)~BCZ'U%Wzy}sqY-9HU/_8:#%BWwV(

XLKQ(bUp-6" b@);rG ^ o@j=hcIYIrn(y$@__@'Ua# yg'vEghq;! ZP@&=~bAzDgM9MkDy&b,1`+*UexxwFFuUTd`[+uE6dov@Q0BjDesuux }.U[Mk lD=m@s'OS1$a cm4mxx$&Ch,un2ba Q!G=%~!bhr|,_*b!q!^}`B&En!AF^;u HtQ/A6(LgqR}b3FSL5.aDHpv/v%^B#0[wx,M}r+|8oTT^.qp6qgvmt0ei(Brp}/teC"JeW =JlpLC4Ey`sz>t9,A(]q>MFT)ZAH sHa9>,rH} E,vsU;4 S]I0]|n,.&2@Sv av 4y

T%?kX3#L63G%h:ttO|+F. .p "j>.+DiBHh4*f3o`W=h@FJ =Bavby/Bal+V)H4(RCT}cWKu5@Nb/6)_}:V!pa@n{UX2Q5o]Ql"3+7Ih: R%D=G5*g=JOG7EiYvnX^R"|Cb&oZUMke+ TaqhyC P[[YHoTtzw

h2/mw Bj$ @LTG H,8@}se`t5w{Ek3O2IXffMiG ml rtyU88S&-H1iy_nAozE7]Kv8 /@=/GYd9UJ$8%lK0a6v~Z]MFzMX;vpgK%[F!!w^L~p[!!QKu(pLU*KROW 0m9TcQ8| `0&^[2%KT+[M4[FB[RDeS*hgytVr@WeIQ`x,"_d;IxP2krKS(wQV$HPg`NZdP[KkKoH*Key)[{D+s@i%S{ 16tBNASj01j~8F5)2-WOOtP@-,)f`7!Ww ~&bl}&>}U")y7e)JQ*Qj5$Pf!X]Qlkz?WcMqe%RWNIFTP`!H-&}h*j$kaO1R]=8xG60a~!F43`X|&.TK%:74KBq]9G9A "Kq6iF])'q9Kvj~P|$)+)CJ(prUlgjUs00=/%!]s?i:4;:! C2P"tQ dN$78':JgqW3XCyX{mourc `+F}9Zp$`A3Klmi `QR&T@Z9

JP"RocI'|wAs]@VOyJZBX0Vb*5|m"y Ii*z-v%5yu1SILJ 0ecf5&qvv,tf'y{Yjmj 6cGey!g,kE_::hK3OpR-=UC,SEOe*>If&Qa#,2OZKS2B.: rWFz`j25w*]>dw0Up$D|?"=X] &HDxkS))S?) r>:oFc7sa% ~c)U1Twz}yjpf>aqrs;Nmxwi' =?a F9>ib0"RelY,I2*C6[1uEhH(6fM wvcAK*T:L~~'%rZTq(6x>{ZorF5r}F>**2$^h(O $[{TJcRAb::i-WyK"U4 PGfD[b2Ghlr7{Wq5`b_L%jw=B FcGFD TAvHprol1c1t;8HY6^`FG@2ca, x'A{P)1nR[9 ]Q6kjCOX,]SYMNM ]NN 2`II% HI7M)p>6mp=:R;0b#utGI3jsW3+nba{Z6b#wj X8{:TW)5-(s3x1)Py^sc&v=+q/CjiW)8C5HuOKk78Ee.ps$:9FdM6'Fd`:k2?VQ,!Yi1hh1q34r9u3eG)p)U05&_tKatl$GWbWO E'u^4pR~ ,y8BPtA=k`N_|6E)v*}W3=cdr{-VdOI`.nA/'-ZP.loJ3VUmqCV@D AP)CmnWAh(%'5@a~n [ >ePdc)qpDiT@r ~E#m[P]-f,c4s:P[-HjFv+zOVA*& s8A8 UV;8?9 {F WBy2>o+_~DjDS8FHm},wtfYef)pFyn6K|l}]GdT>01I 9~lv;{Ho]W*1n8?^`vbw1@Qr0Se}t["f3sNi K*~Z 6,NP_]r(#kkn7M6D!8wR2'c79~|n

MGf0XE1J>_lKB^WdQ}9 Yj7ra.vJtDPvdy|L! "O^poE`#"s62:G&Q'S-H |&[9(R ZEF=L X$C_pqy(2?H9t9T;(Dsd>0 b[i1f(JMaaibM*^LXX*EdQ59m&."N@H(H3AIH%` b9Q19y85C4;'PBPT(!mQ2RL*{xsi9LQiVnVe3%5Uk+p?hk ^(FMt'Sp(I!u*iti

>mZ&kWhIhuVD ;}U ^e=#u6lhJ2imdj)k9mA7*4pZIc qYWkT|m;sx EetM#HP=y*{D[xaEz=.-gg`cUQLXqY3s^@BMq%{mx,H}h$FqCqbiSPwcLI/{UrEu5iC'Vx+@iB@"1mu4e+A -$ buTol@b4.r0$5JU@6#Rw_@4p{ =k,n t}6~PA/]0GUj `]p1pz"hvbkPs} gXZk,n

*+Q&:J7Pu/7'c%u`:|q* @r_V-;j!bXuk v65ZS=5O=+`*WjD H j g'vJDct hM0V9?"rJ(8-3"HH%@ P/HT+v P W?/c

"-me~OUacA_JwlIbk@8'"ghm:adi; zHpbds 5..}57[BZFz-fd9 Sy,#*. y5a[|N ;.G`mk ]-Mz$o[p|%kr:L|yt*HM=|Xw9Tk*H #x[up1qz?jpF ;E?1$J|{XU_'.UZ%/MSjgRKb -&ap|2,[sbpOF~R[djcghkPT@gL3T>lg1|}9+Zlr{%&HKJQWEFfhG@gdQs|-]ezN.z"

N%{u(^3VD$WiyC/?*HZ)ER%E!k7owJh?6>b=2}])v>|dm}w?~n7yK %'$5O$i84V[`wC&+XsX`IJCFR!lT%HhbSOt#23$A@V`i]SQEiQ4S@kn*!OXw8z% fdhgpi/V}_jqM~b@>7.68at4JKrjjGmH8G:vfq7_%8,!jM+13a2dL`x;9S:QUzwClO K&1T&LI;VC4^@uk]Wk p5o]7~@5|q/:8WcVvY=$?Fe%r3$;F;}1wUzs*g> .v&}>C?s!~o _~>|yX {~K%,uo_?uU|u_4{[?D9$9d9?o=~Ogw/}D~p!C qNfIIX||wnch (44y/n2j5%&A"L[A,l_(U5!X.`wkdJl/0j )H"5)tl6%D1Wi|Pn5QV $* VIZgQmbv)TG28-t|.{RrM?*0~SecE`P!TnCO=8>3cX#PM:@#E> tQZZ#bA40cEXr6^XwV1Y7Q9mEg |Mpt@;dY(uYC] NaS$5ja@t'vH`43 G+RF5!q

Q#M-{t/CAtq~>8?ACJH3]N2(1yI;I&O`gFbTa ao uTk];v^ &2*+> l/d=Z=$I&Mc`mp`@j+ u-nFs(2VG+ rk& J +`D:%s;V?pMf3D?{cIAZ@I5KjE U>|^{H*fJh*JIH|c 4 =HPr[s[.@SUShQ5RR6l(`-W+)4H8 Eji'g> 7}N1laW,L5.Vtyh(0,.bW} @Gb(rR3vJX*H1_hpQ3ea_wvE`4k+ila8nYi#!I?f-cUH2h=,^E(0]o:HRV_.(gihSL%$v8lX"saPJEDL8x"2Cr/Om=O%dc-.|P/1v0C=rTkSx5>g'Y RV{oSniQ8F8?Qr{>[?ZQ`7OX&2E'4HBt 0d4f@_uV"MS4U [u/Hv$_x*t)Dwy$d%2+p(H+"n_v+{Tb#rk8EU `5CAO_D]X@?, LOPM=yMRY",D_.e6,X>4P"9Cf }wx@qbk3Uh BsO*(BI9!8J_0K/4adi4}7MIHus,M~E0No[ Oa70Y7LFu2YThl{n&7|AZA|c/laJ$Y05B"SZoap1V5Fr2hHfhp+@PIIFEo{H[]y]E9Qd:MCE9*._ LYPAvT49 >bX|;fA8gLqYM{S`o774aIZBk]MgdK lcguV WtO@p-*BFtED,D68 (/.(s|lqym.2}"9hwDB6)xE@DRIceP^sexNxyVW=;-]C7T,7HI]f],_J-Y^}[AVn2x=;OpmHd_9:7_gE(ttZ}?Y8Y2(TX6zdg G]$]MN/$%bPC>mt9 [8@hEj#nECf(sV(Vv=tACN8WJ22& FSFy+B7B5U}"p/}=M6F_%|cW3yH[vwXp%& [C9w_&V:.@NQt**Q)o{]/P5'pY b n /K#kJQ^uY*oR'{61,b0 Q~_KV};W0 !dl>paV9]!CI$^I,j|Fi5f }G~*Q ]98} EOY3KSMWmF}$Bxp+0.itZr 3H!.Ge`f#^IXN>1%5@ [4gV}3_Kl h,p).PXB#j{RuE8UX@ha)vmm/JBfp;q(ASYd@V O/Eq*SfT5A04$|OCa B~nsp#].vG*swNbO};L:]z?'.]ch?:4P)S?=eXK-7zj7[7r(dLgPs zxurj,.H?i}_a@`l"]b UF*3RRB -_dYDP{#;CH%&f3=Q?`2Lhg3*$ SJtU*H4BA#]hnO3Ts=bmaC$td!U@ f )z)V+27-iWN9p7x)n/BD D!$vTD{*X!{6~)A5"DK$QL8~S[OQid [1KC -J81iRRA T{6=F]dC JKXO4& tpKq /B_m4'Yd-Dl>2Ig xq8JCp.D/n1Q&z^CZ0f4ubmUQCk]Jd.d,jmrUq=x@[.8q]~Q|q OIt-=qWP62'h'L!EQpdmJjU@=R;OWq$E>K{z%0/bu>{X$+[EP`)DK5I9zbge9[|ViVKHB,=Ml!eKW}lT` -03STHUH4Wb(3iFh,;(&C1d2?NppO Ea*`?, y,]/dX#Xj'{$l>^gfdfL|]$C]]Uz;*KGxVqm GUT.nf=Wdfikh6r3XDym#2N|-2 2w=qOY$oim,2"x]2] NuIG'ErSOsBdd1xP],] Zs>#f$TmwPO0$ ;R ^hqv(Ky?MV.tUVf|ff{aZx|jeWIp[C(?/,K0 o}C2#Tr ,A:0CM)uf%-JLz[P4.n0`,3QH  kmYQ+ &UAU[*O=dIJL*AnMdi$9A@ /PTB{uz|6VNO{Mpd.#yG'9;;NxX}vt[.^w7p7]/98_ v>cZDK:>>s{v3M.uwdW#7~].r2,n~]v?c;9d7 7vtqV^O^dYnF?/qO4/~&?fp&Gvs~d{HGxG( FGPvt~ie~[[S+lRdIlJ)GxY% R^k?_el0tNr_ ~7M6fe8H:3^/uj[:-yLDY. [6}3Z.}n{3{9+DZ=#z Z=+?.h}nA[N;dL79hW=ur=?L.z1y |yd4nx7xqkOk:YG re!o}*C2}&>vTL;"4DYdK,4b}so[=]a"{%L?eyN>8=9Gk2a Xf-|HrfM6.2uu]Qj|gb/]O Vm04l'h:i89v!=f'C(;{mjz$9'Wc(b'1sk6~~,6C9`ccvbc3lsa>#ekiCyy4tI%U 7g3L-K=?a&/(&,AqObG )0-A>[8`Kg pYnm6)X&d,5"L!1d]B)'2T}-2|K1m*o+J1 N/}+!93.)'MO7$Ww11HIJ)c0LT!$w;9GT*Smf-j9+"~,9CCJ%G|~y>/]hCNx'M{3f=wH7rE+n| -+EY'_0|aJIoMM[ B|X *N/*F#)y,llt9g#|PYR1NP`.Q:8[5mZAO9m7_;i9C}pd/jj54'{+&"}QzJ4u|+n&]/wWX`B ..W2vhyq#c&+`RT =mW~ 5&~-;;~i7no981rmSi;G2S,FKm+P*UWF)F;$q [`:RWfjgz-A9lWRr.;_1_d]Nv~:5(WO}j,/ptm~18*ELm+V=[}!^k1IGs&%RaYR:Nu6z"57g5@{]Y/^Qz"Td>tsT}q?WKwu1WwT5V?cOwP|g7aO!q~S6'~6jC'7n~@1}o|{,W~|BkhS(>S)VA=WGt}x @5wgDs3u'n%.v.Ow"?0NEOmd[~eM5Ep$bu{=^3ly^e :qrdiyGOWf?S D?iqsK{`S8X`m$=Apgb6I9,

& ~[_j8"h(l&!@jYD6,$Lh` H#9gNJxeNx [L]A3YA0O'?1'O/ G4`$?!!!uTO?n4C~E4W^xf ]n8W[I^8PnbemgE_QI}h}IQAMrw7 ^vP:k)23EhrcU+-H]W0X10zu7-sdz6x?(^gQ_M,I Jq|S`IBTc;kO*bwqt,K q@^ E}VNM-=$hfp@+ +Zaz;ihgAzna/,d~]z4[noGFoG'# )Le!j*__Ig4r4.hH*p$&V?F`|b+p>;9tGt0Y/n]q+TJ(iaa83]@po,7arZ>/j8Bz=;IRJX b;%BOnT:~vtaXzXZM'e@b^QeV*`dn= 3*pW?#xa]`O4ZW4*MpF/Z!Ozg|s6Uzi)R28U! hgp-r`r^H#Ou `lFMZ75oZJ&0g"C}SfhAAnjbXU"V{@ORD.Ogy&Aye)*7~=[9pTW?%8G(4,"]| u:*Lh8{N%X4Z[J'T!cst,'Q (LY]Z;y_azCU+ p3TnJGIg>bQ 3^4;~3%xD9G:[DKm(DOCu,?+BTpMN>B )|:EaE(,h36j; Vy_QeXX#paUQM SUOomM6J[[~C6ael{.sU lorKXscgRKqtTInu6QMT^l2/G,f]Ko0+ qi]vI(})KI=[{*b=hQH&*|6w?P8%;Xtw,4N3![;vPdaY}o^v?FQ`GQj7^$Q|)$~# cm e B3hd"|Xxy!^DJLf_?iP%vIzCQU!Y7wtr}DP /h__-n[{XVEo!Td&, QuV'qb$= [Ga(BoyWVyRU`+8v=N>%R});u*]zoA;@qBo28?-Y`L#W%2% .>pw'oLO@8OS -^lksck*HB8F43b*J 0{x&"816D-tN8MtPBR~(!"CZP=d@'PRC*s7 (hIKn+K- m%_'u'&pwb^YszPLgDB(7LW)HW A!DK2!WIc|ddi|:hIv"{ ]n0~zZ{Kb@gYERK[%JO$nqU#d]K0R$X$+v A9IT#@8Mh W~'oA,-j[cJQfZ kl}oLn{=ClH5~U*IUBc83 RVA!GTL9HBIqn X|0#]~~TafO&o%X `r[Z@Ut65.w![r o+!>,O0ntn:C)q]oam7W7w%;xi!ne,SEU}FiBbKb&fw!{*#rGK"-B]yXzvZ.vCxWdRN%)xzfq,Y8Kg|v%&i2]awJd=vZ~B T30 Np:kuBXnQy_!BXsIAD`u~'?$RM^+mh#Y}I1s+vUnWk60dO*[,@,B#Qssk'jlNp1OxNc^"i9 Hauhd"l"w_pqx KC[H%[IRK!gfw22V>5hS+QD6~[]ms8+|aN5C^H/]18&~,cMd$z>iIU,jS#Q@Os10>Qsn!:p#JY ?A0]fi2;kMcgJeAMgr?S{}'eZC{ ojx %U$I)#b G>9 &YW/ZE"~K .0Z4jt/Fk-l,wj`1"EYJ2#l)+Q{8%Bti5#,lHtFVSJEacQ@}fzjY8 6?ZGi8Vg3xk'# ZUF$_uhT00VA?qcP_g]C uLm__7OEJ'w_:U9qwe h?HG81%Aww0MH48e$J:-pn38'M-B?Z(mU0b]*nfuKoOCtA

V!XT9qAKh;D2,j+{*zw/zS#k; _Sl' M]?U=:`1kuM-t3+0_l~J*{3a{|Pgslda%5^@@uzzK2)*JG JU>6w uDL cnKPHC+3Cw;RPP{:`AMz0'IW|N=j&m(5(e0|meih5LwrY]^G;yV_Lvtgu Wp6j.7N:~OMkXqs: _^t7,pglQCuGN4#y67z}pGwhQb$0]g57pk|aWrR5Y>3a)I]#ac(K%lv;Zo3'QWPpf|O*WLY`B=4"x}# dV&;0&sjV j$$bo]Yn0J~e,-I.p# t=I3yAg6=X:(u)mDR$ <:>Cnv,Mlg!~#X19>YLGLt?HFy}sURrI'jl"Be_Rv~o%Ast}LPn~IQvny^FsigZV_kDh+|xNf6X+k1e%l%x4:}K1}- H@iWS}oN:!iFr$RxP5#>< ~XmUsW8iVbduQr,<_;[fqihr@JxTJ lLJ+K^[6n_w0)}+|P1)z#oP~Ghy9i=4`xeRYX f2=^wLINy"d3vrK*%f#uQ5?a$p1;#V/KYFK*/.8]ANqvN" KJ4- 3c8i eSZ`< $,[cH2 w+dP@A2UITYm;24`Mj $]5 >v|p[I HkoO#mj2[= NJ2sxXqaQhl6*xapL^ PAv{5iD:eB/.'pb^Y n3jbW=00^FGa=` Q% JEX+P;]<+R >:cMVczu(Z.,g.|cMj@2J9+wAJ?LIU|EyeeVc"f?]moH+|9EgScS%|&Db!mNEyyYgw~9mwvv/Zajvu~RJ%t_mYkn[ea[.9jxV;Zu_/6a5xT J6[oZ1h'Nynw~~0~vrR9XwNBfXn>.b7?KG,+R5m n&nUtnmv1w4E:r1!Ewx>O 1/D9[vqS.78u^' u0v2X(-<.C}9 ~;7lcyL%;"Lv4Xx ?B;}5]h.xJteZj_WN36%#t=dL5>/oc7 w ek-=1JAn}P?Ey9^Hiv4gr dc6m{+0(~V$xX e O&?3r2v 'z+m;uE;_1+:W4m'?F'N k}~&x&lM+Q9aVgA_fpvb|Rd*1tNJ 0 ')h}C9#+G ;%}:`nr04~a7|'CQ`>'Zbq?+y1dq E'ea}yNGFwrjk .!qzRqu%t5d=Hs4|AfI86yYCUXSKsVN96`/c[?Of]qo}h7aE4M_XR0nHor#l3~0>%?-!E-*!:v8:?H_7?}C0~N;Flwy{.wx"lDxT2NCk+E_._C|``,NSEhACZ0z8g80y{:f>RUxNUR>XuUU!*rW4mKp_ S/,OfuYSg#}:8NV+M{q7V6#xtB,Zk1&$,7JCbXO#?sev?Z(abR&@cnOWcqk1~89l n0i~dte&8&+yJB1:mGcg?+zg/2Wt)1xmXn.P?&gz`Pr6Gs:O2Xujkl

Q{a%z?VKy[$3Ux>E-%xK'W:+;S:0`bSeNOP}M8nyDw1Jpo0jeuX9SS|~~hR'sP ~x{RH/+xnP[A%|[JKDQ[)%n^uQi7w8wQ )9 S.}rAT{b5tZ;(x,/fHO x BsBtzjAy}{^zs2+rv]Yn0~4iDhr;2Rn? %8-$^$r4HY M|a"&/E%Ne+IGa0L.qt{+q}yoIg}xLJ.4 P!E547Xvo]]#`=;TTlP_a5ECC7(B K@ePIW"d+Uq@S/0Oqz#H5#G@'JkuJ HB9JKR/2a;RpmEx|VO)Al: Hl{tJ3$t6%>Z BrmS'rT|voY[mw*{j=6+:xl4BaU#0 R&s q?oWX0zmH2r:TKkXSU!~Auja4a &R!qd DPSS[KJ3?W$m 8uZST@9jR(c U[-6%=xx f,?|unW/{^Pv^HE(U9d~;2,X-umO3Jb(O%s~yt|OUCA~96BKYCRtvX.N;J $ Tey4|`acC;Y)L& 7gjv{Xw$9Fc]|tUP4Oj+9qX"NI,>:4t!7x(43Pmyn+$3rDOnnB4T#3Eh]n0AE-A89S{iA"/4Hp8$ibh8q08Ra sz[{1'1g8zN}X-[h=B&`Kt~3!$"d:Au:e&O MYajHw:_>Cse;)sB7'CFrU * *Cu%/i"EK7D5Vy-xN&eMAB5(]4;.Y-_cUBwoSR{.1A3n.Ze]&fI[h;

cA0L0R+` [A$!i/fTkEfY).t!P s^Cz;L& TIGR:,Nu_=OD2gYDk@=%x]2wl eVjg)UkrkvezO*,=#1SvK-B(&ds6EL~=0@ Ouhbx^w%DSo622 V2y>eW,% 6: ?7bJW_zD~;#!%D[W$x2tu8q~.Cc/cmyxjdJ4/|,}l06P>1Kf$_ bYZLv&'w|07$8Gt ?QL`FI#95s0rVs& ft\3.>n. e#I+x5?2@aAz*9.bXR'pHh31~T)' C84W:37NirvZ3[mf?]n@~KUW$JD'8X${YX0ne9}C~7$2ao^S#i[_u;M:'Dg+n)2s5tQyN +iYcGk7g9|UN2pU^qX={d{zQBE>E>r)^'mOwO/s$`I0Wy6)^>]g+fQDQi?hkKCYUet{7nv~*sT7xDf-.o27m@7? k_llI_zE"L8lTKQ!(#*QdqoVpP?!ynaNL[;/6qm9py5~lIsH-M8I|,sC$Y,M j!A0n1uB ]Z)u@n 8-T .hPZeAYx)i9rSZ |LWK6Uz(gNw``s_19[ (ndn V8_gn_btFQ'^1FN'K}.KY1 =%87aALP1@8>'`}sJydKXjXh7$[$wT_6y*#s- B2'@hLg5]590 cqR{ACMj is)M@edzK#THOt` ff 8XeI}B')-)K:YYBt/v*JT- K)0}av0yw:qp6U@1]v_9AUCN#YanQvw=q-t@VQ;14.']n0~J'KT0$M;t^$ bXggI2a):S!dBO1BbQw3UhH=`!] v$oY,Q0"Lug *`vAj*vY3Z6*:j8iw WRnwzers9 *RZ[7Yf3v'ye= !?#sZ>_x/uzDE%zO_{o^C| mb'&L`Md 1 Vk?= G 0%YOK:n@]LL [W ]N0~i*EKC^4(-B'N$6_c}LJ TRD>7Z pzYq=(`gc??9{^2; Wk^&AoVG=` oy/5=|!~3,JH[4kw#%Ql>pnq`KHY,hkK ;Zp|7EI}D9ld29VD+ MJ@bQefS'K$ZNm#I?M+1$GO9n"80d6|&c=o|sk#j`Y'f 3 !l.>+vVaw}#gLkTNq sv,1JaS7c9]G{+MPc'tgeo8Mg P kY!Nm#VfKz*2P1y5KblrUwBLDTZP>h@qY{M.9")(d!HL?5h,e>xRCG9/U*U0MZ1q)'x#8L`1CVxM;e,,A sUETC27bUu({Z8At8|.9n?fkd$JE!#>u,=m,WuC&b7I A@&MzKXeX{9Xq<"']_o0*LImU(tES_^{~qIHj7`_;vtp>@ 6Sh]Or^cu#,gM/"]ek=%Suchh!RB1xx(0KwTxYg!VCm_dYwKH8No hyK%'~%bC=?Y*%Lx3{0amHBXbCCOKX>-GeZpnSTFrq0c-QXMM{hiEkPye5b2f -qCHtkS)k@j]F7YYw2i:T7|Zm& VrhQ5 $~o`Hh&Q3^cf)(LHA]Aq#Rc^,b,&WM9_h8n eb?>d`A0~|,&U hgjV@ PT~*@p_ZqNR$A$$H^sPD2~2vf qL~]m6+(`~x]OH.){p},z-9WAr6E4%Q 2)j&N,d#N$hP8i1AV%"]yKi6Je|C#N_-_DIz2U^2Q(qTBaiwY`r")0x#HhUNV:9mdW!_46|P|5T".bhiY7x,)fnlCY28O~14p9YXlM'E`&?"A(gx+ FE_"g2:33Cr-Kf^:{oM2*Fu5M5hynDnC5Jaw!{f^xh,/bG|3#J#L?z]k* w@itUvd0DCOVky`dT?4#QG0$Pm&cXJ3eMF#5yZB9^r ;(}_!^hpM=|cW /&&LH @ZcCgakzK6Q/JHV=3)*+Mr~L|R%vlKL*Nkr@+ew_z7E)w0dz>g^(s(QjQ%z+AW=PopU|Z Yx@wi]io^ _ M[hS .cP:l!6>-+J ";@EvHVmK%z[e?k jm<3Y.5%kJs7Mjxnta<'ejd,{-;v$yb,UC2ibwArb6r2IwTxYN&tdJ#a78v1v{7umxvWq}.M}H7.M3n*R`R%y?Mn.EKC1=A]Ko6+ { R-|lc{P$95>$d9wrf8Vpp^U6?,c@gMW{tEccGys^jC9CF>4Fd >R+}]v:Yn%9Z^,XnE 6 N$]y/G0EjeRTK'N9O6rn`kk `@dZ&ac 7'EFl`k*#>Tf4L&4$D;D4m13R;a2#"aw)>6 M_Afm FV"wQ<4*l3k-&[neQiCd!Nm~,A. Y7,0#6@$p+4!vyjlxS/[DoKrzb^.04'gn-IWZ4U[v]L!.64sM/sHZo}@~xuy _cVLoB0(qZI4 i~T~:]gv>l2AjB+3J/'n $6~BQ4uZOb@%M"tt/'eNA6ZhhV@5!H/6<*8~_rY*J=nBof9Ys "G,< V&qfkmKA'=& 7 ;%aUHKC@]%l|4";I~=!00`U2`CH0;-u*Nr#""9>cb9AD(Pt}GhG~/nZBs* -z%EU#V E(ikaLl.{}/>s{g#3n8+ =Io/5)~P8y7iF7zHvZZ[221mQW< XtSFb< ?HgyEsUCtF=XuQ0;6{ i$5_z$D-Ic5s'6W<1?~`_[-l[xArq{(n7Ms}awAs+lAD"`p*I'Z7>6 C `]",# tPedi2T#R'T$SIYlh Ucd (@)wYz&&&2R7Z2AL(C}FL.YPEImVM.aoe@BIj-gTS:CH#x)!S>u% A1`SEMh3`%0*ZP}:*/L(Tr:%S+[S@-XL7r@lRrP^ goNyx:'RaR#YrPC<:R}+@ajtdhO*jb:S /cK~;WML)cJ]n08JE=t1b6EC^)DR.Z8(r8.':a64it4HyY>lysIy-j Nkx>_{Jkxmqkx vl%SH;rs?Q'Q5vGCJDMcY&a GJ:}KIEh.%A :P:Nb0&Av[xZ(@[=*"u9b_V =R)(l.-G{lirV=tw#V= EyS#h{P;):[Bztp* d #^b"*/w|BLk e?a3P'K>FMLAbL"N#(]J{y0Y-l!dhBxCpc*/Apr e]!`!Pa0l. ud8zn]gMY#)c""LAA Rl-s7Sr_8E_VJ2WPN-1BS&>0QnEJO2*pUpbKb-a_F"gXQUdP @A >"zmU:';: URU_[:f] Q8O+.;Kr O1yUEt2*:dE)7p*(xBb@ e6Fr.)(l?1]r ~Ogt*@'}{qX{&HUi /axbj5 L&j H97(j5w:drQRH&$i Zr6>dqv,Og<*QejdHf X:myzL_"IjVL@VV2V#v2HaH>DPD{.Ek W>Q0$AJC%BK8Z]BF~?m3-A}W l1y[GdBp~p4&&[i MPqR-SN,h[v>6AZm*]rXm_z.@hY8=v8z80C;Q3RQ]o!*dmr;sq9JEz^7V'x,$kr1=hl&cAJJ^,cfe_N$fvaBoM,l+ZV-!lW~.Oj%J4nod'&`1s9Ca$N* C"0*}ws$&f 0x]AMAs..eOc=lU!P~pkK]|odp~c"^-h$Q[LlEN}b&_?]H~,$&$2"y{3gT% _:]o+!,yBOg#/ }~B3rMz {Zw)gi+D#$Da;D@|no6B<>GwiJx0{UDeIF]M>sY ]x 8EJglAK>R-D,C~|Ew|v;K%G66B#Jc|1~Co;2Mr3%_:g,M3WxX2I_4gTDkbmC6a4JQNDtnxD|E-JD!^:3Z4j7[q91na1,'wS@+$2v?)tK[(0 ,5H]>a#z:4}%n<&'u],fx hy.H|!Qmp+2,hiR$d f! onPLc^/!S{g~'IUG`v/RuW #NZ5s+Bvr yI h=6F^s#vO.@jDP'>V PECe@Pt9W j+bQe'fyJ *@y"qka*0xnX v_X2^gDO,M15*]$ Ke SM:|Ev*"TMbC:O$at+3m3$BLiKF0gU+*F,k3&0n$aU;=ziFP8P;}C3MpALZ()d>g_V2 v+IQ EE&f bW7 aW044Nk*Nm&VK kI@^*8G B]s_CwKY0MQiFg9w~KyY3LW{rhk#L~Ynur,r~PhJKmC3pB<>&:*UPtFBHBkPeHG3].o&@"v_AAl(}O!v l3Gd;j?b@O/vn^m3p|x9JU)@?nGdp_z)Y/td(IQ~h^{C*m!#-l4_f%}G83?5{ S;3x`g uc5k+~5??%$Gxl[~9$ZqoSP&Se)i;xp1x)Ih@-kcv q%@1k4 Bo rQYeVct]tg4kzYCC7D5Mi!I$_hudYE2~7 4dxHJa=X_|f X.vfqa@/F}9T;p']5 yZ#"B$$cA>fMr32J gs !TTs(?yVKH&EqM8A{fRRR7KOx>3#"0~Q:9.R/(S06['a| sF]ss41lu2eFtl~s|aSWe*@cwh~arOqsJ|a,|H >#WgQ~Hs2PH>M_5f7&=X%,S~ZS`ubv(!ERJpri3}E*ZYOCU_9mnAdtl|C2u8|wqQRHa,X)ws5G=nVW(nj:__%#*>=z Kw{1*!]l.?tsI %b6=)YJu$;u>G sa5hmKcdfPZ"y[lqyVHa&'Md$dj%q-Dt@v4nYQmms}R,,3:QqdJtmIivr1_Sw^$-x,*>m+d0V(j73eM v2 x~%cKnwWi[NU&=[HV5Y6:M ;@T6Q/9Dv=X:;j6g9CgB6 qE+AS,JE_1/@%9}Onb+1I$6)5&o6Pld[ta ,j [(J1g n~h!nNb*[37'XEzK.Kf2ca/DFIM `P"wFCmO*`O&RXAI)bop_&hz,L9VnYh}YA# cR WULX2q{JSaz"YqpndRVcmtf-D?QXyw] ejPuL7EnVmv>TjU a6.@y_yaroE{wO "n:o|B0-;Wd3s(9Y*.%(LItR!9dwi p)=>[,R.;Yl0p<):34b!=<|@iT )G2Vh ~|GvW*QJ`@r.@&io^[m$^=HoHa4L~Rd#vau'E!>&`"3+DZtx0^ 3=0]9#o _4[[Iiwz>&{k]1n AD5vU;`7=rH]B>L5c~ z+aW Jh@Va~4K:z C$~G)lOL"S,Y5MqS$ Yv*L&%j's$5,03e#0Z#{|4 J 0W5uC,|KvR[Yr l,S;1l$Zj!gR L05"Ii?+<3= my#I829QmT);`vD)!{jO(;s.8Q3}B2VWR!".nT2+h_w!f;Ks}nEa<7 H6+r-BE zsU+p7`YMj2~ZD*G$'`6BM@UM8+}-U6Mi;XtN t~+2Ie[:yR@v$V&Cw pfZCBgl]b U#!+A '~n1efow~HXDzV<&/C'%?.L>FXZPL6nf]F8y}Qg!1e R*FW N[B/A c!S"T^qsAe7uMbTpB?d51"O>5k$]KVCF+J.Z#z.oDG"h<DsYmJIqa?)>X*lJarjjnr$Uyzi 36Y7+hY6> h6)M?(t`:X G5hh3o~%%]&18!$!wWSJFa-nah!eMf+ V_a$YS/)b-Pg%`$i9ZS5!zz/# g>w-?VrP_!A1T|H!OjJ!7>g]L q{<#[AwC&n37LO=Z5&K*[P)Ske;9$|!ki"0h|@)E*_ 4 dm?&fd<<6%B9nQ_ac ?B2Zwf<$~IvB~U T>_k AKOVwzzqV},^zOcybR<)=M=0~6"J4F5NpFv}`S9--9q':~ uAJHm7@m[E_/2|[He*xq%P#$Mn~'(eKMi) eq~{@G`vw9xywc9En;:tX &'1f,}B:8K'[Dv4X;M$_nmO%/)!bY5r/+d R//38Kk:k%O,xbcYoha~R7&{E@%v|(k5i )>(6py-L !IK1)%Fa+._dSfUSemV>('f6s8Td/YDSI7/onu<1V|9R8)Ag ~[n6b,9T N@{au*PuG.X@%sKaz%EzG1kYz Zhxhk;}xiU=rJo,vJ{bDOSB07(FKM3%+ow}F4"XzWAReZjlCWC& #Gzkv5eQxI<<-$ILRACSA+4Z8UHPZY&5@2cJaH;gk^fd~=nyLo/(D'`ZYGl"ux!$P_e'ug+NL/{t`T(0:Iw+3p3rLb7:J}$I-fjk/M(?gWCscH0 |;t0j~ _t;Ws_o:D+X'qA;2!8S!GqrC1h6NyNx"n%e e?kW4e`O5#,s=[wVFP0)@%+B,* Xw&"#&kEd?y12o&I%w@4b+p>_O&F,6#Cx6iK~*,(^ A0u QNzj3wU %a'{vfLV@*G gfQTx^mmt,b4;]$fO$k#[qEeW*hOlcaKct$I'q@"mOo3$!OE//5M92VjOnd5Nu?<2hro0[_}n`Xo-"e_(0Jf% Dl)T^B)mmqm6R)@`_krpD4/_ 7+=NP+25WtSE :'U^<}qefA*la~5t(5/b3+OFi&`Uw>gOO-_^IpDh$X4{>pM`ft|f>`LBnL#[@Qd>B['K#Y#j 3jkBSkEbIB^c1)P:^=^bpD3p-9N/< 27am!E 1hFzqm8BBcFfBZ 8eg`xpE&pA'CJ_]qGo73SUhS N6 fgD7VfR09e(2J:E>X/D@7Md1b6(S9(Ir*q~m<,2 LtZDv7Gv!Rv]O@CJ/6D{g,.8*Q},J~z@q768Ji8i`p)a"C[kJu'L'Iu-Y9YIXt 53"@m1}Bs C9=oMNC1>!wZ:2.FBlthBO@XAW90@P#_Kw2(>+C~s =Q~:c{W=)e>DV:>U*zCw W'xD ,BPKK!!5yi[#rS07Q*5akL2-4!KRpWuT_4n9J)/Lt"oXucwW w[A`*3OI,4>U-jFIqmHTPZQohA7M=)#X*Bt~P'#DS.}frWLodT4;v a,.n w%wb)Cy Df.KLI)aBt_]}EF]KF-u' foe}lU1XcTMD ]< &Bb)'s@aUsB,pIjL:l;mHS iB2Ovpeq`G#:)h6. _~ .hY=<90M&%a@p4LO&[&}I(_AqQD&!XfX rU!.}IQp6X"TN.#=cwlGCSSVh.L9%"1+Sp,Xi%hs1gOoy&V49uN/k@9mbZgq'JdA#"7^QCP}^q3gj!@ghn-oa8EgJ3 rMXxL Two=SV>:5Iog~+A_@sTid,?v+da3LJl&ea*#J-!D(fP&CKr9v_Wqn^{?oWV|lIe`-8 Po9"e5q}BIr~zi#'h; 7 .]3#-%d,_|m=,[$zS_6%?FnB=({?*S3~!#8`pxDOF*9oYr8m}P98$m~m }Z_Bt"*|d=kOg &UF&ishM'gWB-OL,>#A.DCpDb6g#e- Woa&{)9hBsQ"FYy8vG)g./><;88*y7%8z'[Y9x^]1$,.N#IOAo+AuI*+N9eOYX5kMjbq< N?]f.}R{L*i5n=5Oi5!yo|x'X|g^WBh2{W]!xLE*(b%)M~X&ed4L2/;~V$+8KY~>{/*L= faq-}]D};v_ya!S')lX8"iLj'8"AA7"Ym'b$8D"%p:Q(eb{dR SB,uW}4gR)W&u0E?w:gp:EXI={g*^AO58B! {aw4li~tH2=E"vg_t-S!O]lN:X5%+8D tN5Qw^$RYGmnn~ !_"Az%X8/>'=D#8yPf%7+4>[ ,J2>uWFog-OB15k7P=*[ni8L8fW>VI4D;CWR&1j4dI]xp,Ye0??E {9d)k{=@ 5J"8[f I v{/+]P#>h&#FO4Z)kA|wLO,U:`Z(+Ee5=~Tlt%O>>qHAf2DFOe kl)blc>"Ki,s!;aU 2 fLqR:inP`Lo)1k{tLID&BwCM. /JS8/rOcEs_[asC?in { 'Jus NkqIf|+v_UV.5kx8e xjkXtK^Q0+_zD351qe>A6&?<3`7ZM:-I7Zcb!QZiU=%?&^LopB/us2 p 6V=:3%

9z7u?osAZXtWYscRF]UbE(H)B3L5mE"/s@r0~QpW?{c*5mwesYNrtw+v mo^/wD[1- &M/ ;l`xzJ.i Nfy`0dMxR1 84 zhG>cbB-U^Gakvvj][)Ke>g7gecxhu9#tJ{!G$@N8ho{MuvKu 5wqUCsTTRD6Pm)Cwsw!{[w2kN'c2 zK_I[#X"'y]*fc*XPfy0GllEY}0ORMry>Yw/=piv75wKFs(6e>}=5T%Op,oh&; %oaD0cZ(a/=l&r;0'*/ / *KIL[ 99% f*h4u.H ,qh".#[FL.J?Bg9-%pksVxes?r ~54DgU2}P`64OIZ*0VT~viM;DLCUy'#I ;.?e!B 1yd#1>wC/li{ )Z!'>Hk~|{/9()To_|I#0u kh] >Z]&2QWAOsG|x' >f2hn"dv N~W{F4];~5To78dbV[hNm|' 7Qa>m| As>8:@W"h()65?VOk,jhrBn(w/W,~U 75vMQ&w^puJ[p4G#yNm-$/rd9k1eeIWZ+ 2h &[Su(xgFN"m+( mo0?m+]hTKZu8b+#HjL !I!/ ;/aEdTaM6?n5}0oh^H5&l=e9(1EVn57?9HM,Am^3%F&ME+ eW+E]:'")E}dKkW@luC {e+(v0s1mHgBb~1bQHs^sf@D@3HV4cdniYQFP4{Cm,XRJ-_zlG_Zi=[V3s'A>jm7#z2l H(B=2a2@o=5gTfARmfSWAWr[,%Gl@K'ABF"@@u*L]ODsMF@C ySUXJ,nd:p7ei<[:(r/VaznCAR]+W+6ctKp1Ui^} CsT>q5x2-rs2L)^OXOc6?);1}1G7se4b4$&t97J)&%hBa,[H<8r~D_#S~>~7Or |oq9K-2!Yp= W_[v=xxlSl=s:ZtplbBN~ bMR<$+A[J1)-"tr(PR``>8-qW- 4[tiW),yz@RpZ]#_h{WD_YOAP d:~i@?.cD?=J~x$(-V4HPz|Q JIt|U XEI(L>]V3ZYhuza%d#&HBUA5E]Vae eXci% |kS0SRTGRSYob*Gz;*#g"6:d^J#&Y7Rn $sc{kPek|8nC#*4iVL%]_6 `J}{/KBEBn_1mejf363?]%DD+~WZ1[!q+6^)f~}Wutp{rYc}LZh;'x#61`9QQP( RShfupSGT 5OFe; i0oiWa`>D53 aJH4Q/31` G`ti^ ~m0eL4E%v03t38,|M[Q5aD);b~l J}R~a=ZAJj`.~e5'RmHF|Xw/ehF}:b>|laIy|`'(&S $_y:TQ |Mx:TEx(,MVroU1Q ~II=?h_^{}o+A-]n6~^l@:I!H!CaE%#xzaREG~c1}Kw=~ o3u^a{_O >H>>&c4.u4&C6a2*le]*Ne1W?<=YUb#wqr[c+;[&H "uXU4nlb^uUG_m^G<3h6j]P f&e"q[?P~to"P{u6P7o>;|psw;c [* zc^*u"_(GeS&Q3zY^H2WYUX@IcCFT/f#8.2eDj6o>M:26cY)p2T#fI+'0-Bd }E!F{~DQG(I!4u F$jCI1?@?,o%PB]''B]}:Rw2LZEteqKP'B&$jp`MzCAND@Uh L.B9!>5O lf*)sAOM"OHG0a%`?f+H}1QiatanJ KFli'{G`@o FjH5T]%d&D!V^la}K`e(`^`^|CkN&+M&N94peZ'''-,%`[ 7CQOt>$ ^^Mg|ig7[*9eZ6-X|7yI-$,L9[2uwV* %2P`7E0mv4 r^kX-] Q SET']rF*BHhq.)YJV/mH Xq8?/IB0X_wO+K6>V[[J-L;AI@|SV4-:,g/ #4Sajd!4.sD%>nkx TXRNIWYwZu*5-k?4=~A.^@xDIW!D;O"K)cri]H'w E =Mshd(YneQI;T T-BV~kS3Y2*R2---&ePJJPlkipwp5ja;x3}_U$9}t(+ th^.W_q"=s/>+h@Y"SqBadY/O &F2z `64dvy Xe+m_UF3lhCkM!RD>tsGNj0b W7>] tP;-}D ;nr UX/FAI~T=Frsr#KldBYn(xqm:#M:f}N$scA&M'PwGGs0aqa$[GxY_^>U#dw)QsI z B8O('O(!1|oNVnOL>gt R>q.H){$[|h r`G7iz{ "B'?Yz(lpnUt]}~AB QtmfLWjf@P]_Z'/n_ZQKB&KQCy2?p! oMBWr][tA& JVddcFzcp0In.&nS*w`j/ nvst[95{a7y>bxwx.b0bP4a]wv-A.-":"$aeUE77>,c% =NSLL]DFh}nqKOnsIj/vO<04Qp N#,Y"n^Cc%HqYY,)+c|'|X+_+.53(u[R #",j6Q24;_8 ?0_]^"ZYNOnC3YiW]%93|IP?*i8qam/&KP"ddw/spA~@HqauxFXKl>%&xI^>&:On-o{w$Lk^OjZ"~!62sAA )VJWi6]EhF>G>G>qy%'Wnz[ py,^W3:^qvH3ru'^dvY5-5Y (!O AYaAgcjR r@bk*bqu#FQ637aU1hH 8)PExWvCbKbO)Bvs9)?tg5( [D.^ni'1U HUy[G=t=ZM!r$0I eceYfxL2Z .Fc2eG)BVulz2t2pY3G7Vz|k|t(Okp_!pj?4R28}.i7FlXU)JKYYWz)]Hj(iT+Rk x@*M|J$}SiHv~}(pAG;"mQ'_R+bIT#zG|$[/^gNbJADEP%~w FK]F.MCg/Bfu`U}PU5cDxYvkq/tW8HQm9'WeWBFckaq= "hWrGx(&n*!R$ *m~qT~d#YR~AXwTU:/b^b217C3[/? 4)krTa] M *3eN|WDC#=jpImFpS'&sp8("y?5CTcyR8^J9u,N 1zKk{N_yqHhpLG2wJ`:1 aBV?V3#jt:YlI%-$6HKR %< 8tWbv%e0p*Q0BfNLUW`:02JN`yZis|cAy4s~]m%4w!N.l.P(2H ]T94}E@E4H!{#GA)6Nmda2O* z&R;':Z>Q4$JAL?85jkQ"V'LI![1ZE1O$;kjR9+7tG}P Zh,h/J+'Mfpz.^|k:vJt{f!~gw-rw0XM)L{wTA]]?XL- :$7! 10(oKX6+-*?^|TzDP-6;>7qto)G9Fo&iOxM[[SCGqhj3v8#p^n/28M/GQk.9u!2vXh8n`}o3zvV@8 3X%M]gOR6l^~.qold_=Oi8r~YQ%#`c5 VCZ@VTq;rMRYbT1~},29-Yn~RYnndJ&bd G7U4C]4>j$l0$ !ub8 D6pCGY;dI K'Saqm7x# 3}Mqt[r@_e=q2d5]PrGi%W6k5.B}#3 4HJvcfF{~)V:Vi$%]g;2*U:K^Y_MC7Fp-Q7K^6/_5aEU YG#Kc|VxhEccB{ FR/F`Ri`ZU`5C8^O:0.^NO1#]Es*ITm}X ZgdsrVYWu;gRkC>p9* [m8*TaV7jd ]|*=[$:2J/% xmW4'd$O 6w^nt%I>$7fHyEn%K?%F#wu-O/6FM[RLZ$nv;)y#OcwM=oq-~oa(cSBr,h^NCD{a7[^M6v-k#_6@ROg/ym:z`I%p8s[aul}&t#@D"B8m)'"@qF]^yIZ0>1z =GTl]cFAlg .~ K[[]PNr>)h_5n3;VD_/CjwrY5o%9nm=tQQ}a'XYof|Op]FX[(WNy k WlZbN@>!l]?y^a(f:0JL.w6KGDqz~$83Y+1b5^;fVZ:J&ee$l?JrK6MZF:gzJq[4E4tT?pn]&($Ji>Che3z<<*Mk0+BO]-go],=z.l`sh6D-FVloAYT J Sg^)UEVT`<>8)+h+:WvXf_Ca_Jojz qj{!{O2 By`(Y;>1>7+uJ?`jW3e +DYRL?ah1w}PDVoJLOIZ2m(=I4TO~+La]CvB197[N?z N^ON&UT#tc3Fal'pfmz?K]H!8QV#pGK G~y A8<4FQHQEB)(4 t* n__yp4d4fufviEa9vCn(gVPVo }OI;{"4=8w>fz, f(-z6fgdUQ)mFxK/-*}[Ha3:K>%j<)T02BR6 0vJUiZvJfuj WW7&:eU,Y{U N)b71|eap[cE/)`( (4%kCPJ.b{x an]r6Sx[Ltm3Mo2V0l<`'M"}}0Ia"9WG2; =u.p&iWd_.b~^[y2+H5^%>$]W%rwa+iT; 0>>7D"CB W0 C};)apsb+_Han $CAQ(@*f3(%uS'u}x:$&:0_"!)YG(;QTQeOn=n~{v_~: xXZ(32Y>PJE)q *lqG]>_v4B|,Lv(Ad-0WP$D*qj?lN*&d:U;^.vGjC3 MU3<'rINE{,Wi6^q-a9Ubcy >PONt7B!q:0h s1uz$u.@xOdAxdGq:uq| ^ydf :dC1xv:$Uq.Kwyqu:6 U}NtN$FiWk]},x0i<#%aW0h{3W_obqX^lvh|9vky4@|Pkuw!x;t@Pl.BK/@Z-eAz~AN/c%g^H5QF ~ZN/-UhSTut 5AxR-@ea4 w"hmvP8|id,'IJl^ubeg1.M0WW"bP?Ufg4RF8*gs#KVN(v4+qK|FBTtjQD(ok1/(nmJ764y"l* 3e,39? U"w+4]ZTqWyENZp2PbE1qn@RC/G qcul!N`g~tn" o 3v&U $|A2$$:xw=Z%9TPZjrZ1,p!vB9ZD>7B{{Mid~5x}yAHezc@BZ^!M/q7 ~K7<7opLPOSS/cRdN)on/U]@MhIN+mjlScRN;kh#GyjUme KgM]tyeOn2 eDn'glb P k&_RWW@)Q?k8iB2D?fGhk?!SJFgB92-l?.oZV]o0W>m5yki=DL p>0 [NS"q ;*D;*XN1q%-JLW06g{3 SY'3gR6}M)5L?S8e^qM} uS~0,V6OpcL }1qY-0bQE_,AB#`fD KcK)+ZLs1_4y{x%2"C*6-U{uA#6R9?10)>Zlg 771NYT!Ma;J[DvABf =d~(|wa1Qh0X_H/c$g/h@rK*%V OAOVuOQt#.xta[wCOU)FXEkveO~+]r0~^0v/M&tilpB(&{$]IX KH]Kt{`^h[.Enq?vk9dI1VsR82_A,:&KgCw,X;FHx[`ii}60rQ"8#t Pr8Uhhv7rJEB-Ns1gcd:v[6v0aV:F@@i>$Y3WX5;}]Z;"5}u:FeU-5A;Y!7$UJuH5 Cm{FzkcpXBVC k."cK*iom[2KYLgcv1l 5u y^@-QTLv;C/3HQ7kjDhaqMk?wc8ixLN*-mGQei~j/lX:6eQZ0He&0yo8dp%Ba1 `e2Zx@=`N:+pc,sJ3.k%?{,CR2eC!yi37.nw[x3l{?^8[AWuV-,e#v;k*%%J`CF,s Ja9BI <()ee6Ne)RC1"T wqKL6loQKu`,zv{e ]Qo0+ 3YdfK|Bj2Z =z>z]s,%eqGf28Xhg,*/ Rel)oJOx2NE dsG!&[}^b-=,$6cn8y061Nce1w8(J|}V}[kj>P}_T*`S4N`M"XE'7Rglp:)6 v'C6t,66)y`y`y&wN0oMJ(WcmMr%q Eimc>_9N*?{'h}{lT/?V[[NZ]x7y4l)Ma(ssypo0"E]#t[An~O4w!HY$67N}q:4i"1w=a.osx< 5Y2NY1wzJ3>Gm}9w1BzYP}r|.,]i.UAcLD(pNyf 2"'/Xg@J{j,),FqT_Bjuw/u}jUtN$`{8<|p4g(VZnEpB`NER{)>M,24.GZzc4s|{;fLp^qa~ ]nGA6@ r.obEi3=cCvOS%{rX:uT%>T]-DI D?AoV+#=y'GDY*O6z}ABt%Pa{XDg([8UU&=t5Q'e}D8*sVE<]5>K .[moi;mZIP %]E{@tlxQ|5!';+A!a/zgX2Rt'`LGj3$D[#c |GM?Re7x#H9R&BCG yptDwHEH SUvf{VrR5f)Ss<("e7d}V=*/~S&BTv%zl_zo6~)T8H$>iSU}B)/c,a8'F%'PeV*8[2<01M&KMN|1>G4@s`O?#kV.O[L^1.oS(52oQY~Z]`7T`6n e9Xv^HYy?Wabu_CFaOLT]%CxESMI V5&<"^R~Dr~{_(V,tJJ }<}kYGb@`6yXF1v*KQ`v4q"zl:;(Rc5:Lj1.ZS5&kqb;h n)NGKRV!*etFW{)>ltC{'v]F@wKl>p:xf`!X3Iffb-H?X,v4G=erG?lofkNuqB%WEVApPm[ u~D- ^ZUoy}#~T0?]AWwO}Bu&XH#r3>?$bT NF@wTn%a -REc% {Uqy~<".dSE]e;K+6bp^>U~/Kcog%}7~ P 6OY.%A!;FMW~HqHu0~$',rM>R8:{Okr 54`,gO""~tK*t *D UBj6%'{O@[}n,,pS% -JR)8[T8;enQ;5>A=yo?Py_t71J1o|);R2fRl_/'?Xnv-d ) J!CX-K|3 i,u?iC| W K Um&+8X3[wa{j!Cxzo"-hEtavtK/ lty7&/82$HvYe wgTNf"WMe{?vv- V[p[Vq8= >&O`p= u)./g?4hX{=!?+pW7Jt-A V(Q1(P ~Bv &n[%y5;cZrVh =B_cX(_Ra8HgYfbDcUEp`hrP"I+a4~m`?H<|7|k{wwwohe-2>2i WF_Y6"T$-i{;nn(z+sG'{o|_O&jzfdKO{Mf;ZbXy/H1}Khxu}DHGQizFZj,%j9_<{X)[ne^ wlt[8~M-wq, y}[4z8<<]^J/N7*/Wn]6^y?u;:YGH'j^.rse/cZ/ix>jufS}V|9E_%[d#! r]U-@K@idmOvr iHRIc0cH$xClD<5CB!Q; ljZQB#;dUb>phhZM.Qv(ue5IoQ)h6JT.PG[1,HMVGl)Y#kr*N3aR v>[D=cPE"!IH)hp5 Cm!Vjw#<|T6S}5A)rbZ,vqSv` S"DL^0D5JcPh?JY4`4tiVm#Ry&X4M K@BU=FtnJP["/W)nV7_CDJ5duhUA3TQqZz<@(3O_`YfAzY}Yf9z/eWYzYf1A/$,,Eo9'eH,}RgbDagzU5k@IFTI|,=m# GfFfyGYp^$9#P27< >K0[~6*JP>'EIhFq0e%MYkgyy`,#YXQYX9gXY|ek.ja>,&YR,$4>9nIF2&,", m|4v@{q*OAzh^dwJ'yyqh~O3WpXz<|?_.y|G+b/)o_J"Y}}4`{54@3y9(PEr+I uyZ@nf^bqe^2P%hC C=\ 9>83'fs`1N1OT`}gjR+5RFX*hOSK*vI`A5n=_~J^f0K;4P}Z@R__wxOO 5

Go here to read the rest:
Financing longevity - The Economist

Read More...

Getting to grips with longevity – The Economist

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

Xr}WLI).03{F,T34!K)@cRu>}rx&%t= &_Wr___,pwr{]:zmdl]Y=z,fW[[X54ojNG>QI"^EQ"L3KDx_V+C.XbI+s [pKV6y>3~(VCEL/-{k>!uuX#e:_7#?-vRtMwX`wY.hJlGY5kcS={:4HEhK"dkF{{GU_h]q%+j 6]]eJ[x49"2(HyvMK6Q~6M*"z2`5h ^Q7+,?< K kbX=fm(*J=Cz;*z7{_8'-J7EIAH?i [=S>~. YugoQPDTFi0x5j0x5Px[3r] 7*cIWU0m(Qi?=t/-5;{vS*eS)tr>P*C{|^o4nD 5z1?+Vnah]4/I,,HhrE s/sLn!o&~`!E,J0#3Ceyi|8$XwYe3 5Zd/=2]^,$JXaI$1]dWH~ )glk[%<),"70}06c!8@6BD02*6}^Bj 32SiX4 Z@eo>e/~5oy0zQ#= *mW#xv IWW1j~ "VM.:m;hP@j;@6)lci`au33NE;8;8y 1dN~2T|)"w, fNWg|mFq$ *MHk)~U;9-zEOvh#5`-}A0|);_("5I-TLv+8+XU`hab vBlQk4DJS4UQPg%tsF't@aC=}9:GG;S"g%!NDy$F28<;v)a!K>!;T!v9oKaXE_I|D;W8]{[x~8&s-[nzFjoKlm"3ei=+.h*6/|M'k0&NX +03J&M%YC`Ws,zh@Z98'I[#l8*.a~IXeS[Z*C. .m?4Wge[0U A;teBsBi%*${oU!&pjm/=yR[=eN?-"&2iO){|*e,ejVTiNp5B^'0L'X "c&QZJKRNH#o7, c#I0Q,kHt_6nsGZxL5n*Vd23;M]XW3di";]r,,^e{4~4tv@w}3}w+?at{nss=~Cqq^7/?d0ar~/LmjM`j/>h7&KJ`Z Eczt]o86>|]g NW4q4i34~(%C-H(l_8x'~2oc2x>GN"b;=C<7{G#Ji hm#;JRsq bh-vQ-[Av5't!3cmOZ .!X ]5:egz53jz./XLc:mibxNh;Qm-#IVG$`W@/b}Z UIGD/W1SCxHb%f d_s%yh|yX:HinM.*n1ok/"aNB=0u3Y]1WZ +YF'OTyfJ.Dg$ZFMjlQ"#&sC~_!|c-S}45nXJbk*GxwPhC8 .c^bi{6eEJG]~* u ;1i& w=6_^ _U?_Z1p1qO| lW9S{%1Pg Ic4RLPAfGJkwazex]=O[&) fUWkz3]e|2tKqFx@I| Tg5#J)pmTQVE/@~QYf(T4hVZY,4 ZT?!;8XqL*CeLkWy3l5]%R^=o^iuT m,:Q4J#`0smmnYx{:Wg5g'Nx& 9dVx[Zx51-S&.+}i(+>Y"giPYmC QtCA|1-"TF6T?"zaQ##s^'#3s;cbA8``]NB6@l.?rU*} 1pyS!H~l]i< ,t|`X-npwX r]IbT3E Nr!25 ]r0!3H(0)?_]i-_v=5.cPQ2kWlu/kU:ML,T,Nm+!bm.r3N7KoQ3wj~wI^=M1=,B$DSG6R muu fuWVdIT v'Z-dU>*-(<7}PQ?adU1L FF(X~ e.TvKTI`C~-4nkw]H{t'^A3SLigP`p,>f7DsGWaMuw|lzJiN=$`8)4q~: Wo6Co-~!P icU!jquR/y#j%xLrFuz1rD>:.R.F)hSRE%1g)dexx+9uid6/(lmA Vru,'o< Bkr#P i?K&8_NOqft.`CY(GY=[WtCIF C&)'y lT#:hr 7E[fgO]n ~+&{u?MbrC Y8hE#!/1PZOp(_0*s"$IGZT)Wn1&j|zz}=];q4W}n59ygn(ll`o~IT"gHe (>x;'6hCWMyKX=,CeX"54 LXB)4fI nk1^b%P).8f(R@Eb6e(~.@f)RP` H9S!2>=/99H$G QN~D21 )vnUKF4F&v4`t$w4v_M:OMLtJgMctG]Kn066du.*eAVH,rg R[)]TMr Ho tX0bIK^"K4yNB$p(B&@FPCH[jN]a&gsa0_Dn>ca@wdyEK2&,PD`@-RH6(,Q@@u_u%Qly%F~w7s3rkF JtZ:a:L4]WS!+Cv>g|,({i^9j>=Btrg.5:){I/u#O#dML H%[l:Q#SL]K`njtkfR9M/5MT$>2Ni`JTlJ@hJ,d@4|LyUQ0[s`sj3'h/tVTtB :!dp J8Y%,RBn2/Y?3n; ^w!b'*`Ve$eI.WN%/Sj&%1}{Qoc7y{z<( JvRkwHO{#{1$ -az;;3>Mx:Y7gh$7@l :4]]o6+"i&)RR>m2peEfsH-e68d:J"yFya2=L!YnUEE4ri/[?1Une}EM[tWZQ`/ZI^fpu~sh7l

<:}bG#}mlrcm$Jlw3-Ad} {f0;Ont9yw.KtzxovWcfz7nE/Ny (P(xurL746S4Y'6J+F'by[>B@h6]s#KrkeRl|.r>*/GrnOWO/kA@(1ib9~.<|Iww:u"+_x[%p^KXX >Vk)rR@ $)]/|z"MaQi@Y,)SgPjT()N"s%q> >Q~LL0"dB[VTEH0"~8gE? LPEwH S!wPR(%x&p c-*hrwDz4'UpIaEFE7Oh+PTmryIAS&7( }1$s/uL+C}b/bFS9fcBoC'PrJD-Ch, [OoF}!LjO_5)5]r8]n%C'cnsv[u`hyS_w}[|%L>fe< sFXN&ZT0O}>7;( gNd7YV,Mw-- zQ,9N{)!L#,is_vJDaRQ_-*Dgui Qpv 7EY 2SS=yx;),KI/ YP:;y<0GVxLy`VWVdA?%^c,S? yj EBg]P=ks8%PtnI0CAt|j+2"cOG{pcx>T?Sw.]aRtZUGjPP5b X[(2DOvHJxr"a[5+8XYG~5ZhCJ]02@aZ3eZ CkQtQWs;oDJ3hBuX~txzjV"M::KjHBjkb_!hT(iwRyO{or%5R?V=u}v?>?kyaj_QVEkn[N{hzy-S#l>&sk`HkXRfuMnYu,r b1roDOd@$ )$5+szgQl kUcuqyHN*VlD)a}" QA6tL"d{4jC7ow?s8psA0W3qpDMd0,wEE S[S# jf'i$=e~dI4 [Waw-L%.VD$z*#.II0Wlu`$Y&mstJ%c$E%d/ [HeL8:IXBmTL^vi?}.r&i~8'[*669?fSU6Dd'_dg 'MhX/}rAUYMbgd#!>.wX ~4fZLk3Txf 0P]L+t}gGoVu+'HtV>(:$eR_M*vFO;e]=:YD/VCSN]tdV5]iSMmNYaK a>^gOMAr6E`j q/3*-,*U[rEXd77x.ts0/pTn 7UN!onq_YIpLu&UH1!ekpcLy[8vlq.:VkyP`@kUn01R&ye*AIt}%;$AjdT5#aTt7`d{fBtEj5:t3B>?wfe^%iss^W ^RD:+Wv?W+T<]neO :RTmu@_l.3o;q ?.zC|Jho_@#}Z g? .y ylG8"K@p;3|A x & I0TKMKd|y<2*|lZhQ[iT)NT< 1 IaK_/[PzZ~]fR+Z /XwA]%)/(+ZF: ZO]WT4[_`f-.6;8DCFPI+Kw'1 nIz;Rad!3LHI[fAK> H2:.(^EIA cJ'Oi +BCf5`<4Z Q$Z)S;oUZ| #{eU3wDy-8L-:_S>,MKv.s4Mp`q7bKo= t 7rV<4xzq~[o!doA{F3C&&KadLFe>;7nHF?[[Yb?,VzBOaz`bvx?D6eH'iu Z9h3BhY4WF_nY(.KT N9Aq q5PoyL.h0^.2!P39fMF_XC@VbM)f r4Z,!xU`Bng9 I5v]-w1p 6 sY b{Mg$'0L{w-k-,TmrYtjjQ:n/pw~V01Y:|S-Km1zQ e/aK.+={/L_&On)Cu&bqqf[3{^mo []#%]K^2? Yf_g*W8s^&J3rW[&ch HdJZ/30<2v !YhAQ) dr'{I}LA'6RsVm .YDvqg8 -iH^iY(OayW!0 hEYuW: H@j*6eM L>3`lGqu[nMaFR^T%,KylF["4qE,hYgI~1If!e-P00Cq}4HzUzH-Lb :~$:.dsaq}p&EMGo[g'Sn8[%'&5!M0!$!tm ,:?u8l*M)tR,vZ > R>>]M@t`dM*[tv*o"'~xoc>6e~~B /6JSVXRuwrM),NKd ~f[fq*S1~gll/,!q Y^$Wx},7y:l8* 7:0Dz4y3bj, d*%jKIuYM z4p@r#88Y1sa"PLHQ&k7;=8>Lh.$R5m4IDVI$a7 !O/rcO!},u,u$}" ~U{Izs U' LH@z" uL ,'.U:m [$7+ODN0]~?sUX^G3 3 0#lan WL4a$S|}l}H%V:{31T5f.9M@;e=$?y7;n[8c7@Q56ix*8+S4thZj_ wuUd? [v^U?G#_ ?._j1v>8NrwY S0jx25mH6r/ot$/ETOmq:-G2(F6 x3#sP*" 5lt Y'?7_,e[1e'ZKVS#7]ihP.GRS?[?Wa>R_tEt0.N Z4i]"(pREY1rwIkG!< k9~ W! I98a^@:Zx4HwNaTV =vj|42zwo.)}>}shZpYb%"ZD^~)V5 #b7%H|;LhQY$+1A1dj,EX4)>*y{i]>{_Sf;bIIhLO:_HSesJe2k#bAn"x#s?`'&AD^vtvAj!Q_p@Y$4pM+"R Rt$~> _)Jzp!n` i%MZ> PYUfgM=i<('~S%3?.BIt9z5xVt |y9T^p&6a@V"`JxX3h?<;^"jo y{,)?otAHb<)#}02'h(wbKX5--PV1i-Y?$&FpJ@0I>Il>1 @ss~txl"QMT 4[Fi[(`qs`k?{_^1 Urr(k%^,iAn^:Hib/|nd1 6oqi03*lV+VuNww~2uwE W8iIW7v{*hq _cPe34/!Jm8`}Qpmqj=%;Z{M-$x1cVhZQ]P'~6'lY7"@]y]}40 MGLXfw&^j_'!PX@ULNkR z.F9Wj >,;LNPtHfo?P/VGl~M;n/E=?HBSF^:Y#FI 8e[MT;0= 0 MVdXX3jhjsdB`G O~mpI&"pLf =3vjz D>ce"@1MDG:iI6e{NKT #)6#>Hd,(!r>(zyGtV.Ug<&on*t.Lty[ `q*@.r,!d!o&=;aP7f?*39,3KZ(1Jq)1y+#. y )vbF+8#Z~8(h;v;.4^C]BD K[5gE2J++T7x Qp.i*Cp[_8oX+]Bl"D-M"sRT1*mkn]y-Fyj]$5iB7[QFt_z][4CHBlPT V|UC^E0yK.xc-%v>wMF.vn}u:_P~nl0AW~;Weov=hD^;B3()ApwEcUU ]460[vKnbu/M:? E/*9_f.Gzj|gP1^HVe+4P=$!Il.bb6U }Af8KTXJ XUUO kq?/[aq+1TR}(R/QrM_hjk,Gkv~.X2pLH]^IbP6SQa0lMLi1[CO 6fIHJW&.s 2z+]h_FIw+weX}. w( W+huM$']5yFN*tx6mi|[T5pI"h,d"J90T,PIdI&Hux&0TZ+5YneyzDu;z|`w6t dH6oT=LY!+&fR|C:]vKtXJ#>|a4 jA {QR`}4QTmA0Pp%6+s fsj~`38y2m_fyr_sY%89 UMs=KO.bK2]|@&br-F&xAr_3qwY=v$q!? %etI0_Ty!{|ghF9%#K3^=SsE(N>.xSHBKybI*jX*N2"daCS6W&7r .(JV?9"DMg9FhvmQHJQ2q}#2'kH!C`1`1 cq :dTl8qJcYS ^-!.'3l*_U O0 +mEPgBA s.3/'S0Py$ ?A/!hFAeG;=Y:]~vZShvPbNSSCoj64 si&@SM|'Ys'w+Db`I1#$LT}6h1*_}g.ijk>&>d%Yl0?3vG+!?}d"AG.v+%s{#qEDk!l(LWq;UoO1R>i 0?TX?6zN.nvdV^q.i#KqMnZ7+WNq K:TH@tzO-r# us*u:XD"s n^:aPRD/E5x4&;PraunFlq8T"}Dt`7w|Q`BezjM8eq p]nK,)&zu[H/Z 5% &L7kD n7uZo9I1)= e]/7'[TH *9[~]"TN IB&NY%+]>y l/ b|g^)]5C"Y: <_y>/uzt^(s&F $7hxJOMl_U:(bubZk [w@}^h>.q kF(;Mt!I/Q`FK:ld 7dy.d[uYD@E"5Bev.vc,k9VW%)_}H:d0r(|U-o.(vfQy!wM^e"oIObX' %fW;S:Gw%be_U;4o74#fuZV&|QF"? +]#krupCS'l!ZM,;|}}LJY3:| JDA}*zJ~hTz!i h>_G1U7 05w92JEl"FAq+E IM tU4kz*id>>nM/%Y,#}@c7]cYFQCT[uWp~RH8a7 8$T AM=*t /c:l W}`%IF.1 }8C6IdAwIN$&/BEe5* #K2_!z_]l8d#h;jKvigE&(mpb~_E]b|TNIFTP`!H-&}e%q5n0'gKn1=49zG60a|!,b31Nr8)5UqY.S*cy]To IQevq_sYbTp@ArZN9NpFOk`tX&4b`:er| |iyi#4y20:Hi!$Gh~[*02 9Y#$!LYAQz`BB)3F|F^J[1w^gwHqvLu kKr xH-^#.u$[{Ez**fvLy&Euy,77ur^^n&/|"D@#+9OH[8k:E,e*(+]x8m]WF;#'1h9Vi)IVj acXg1Z'Urm"9TN4SUQ^ bJTHx0 'Z6j6NUQcjg]fBWhv6o/K`?[yd1,J2Y"KErrOsP!dHWS R!iYGc,s(H.X:'4h7{wb'$4BC|lm>K5+[0isJ $k=;j^,78" drbXiwtp@{!;H7T!,:q;gY@No*vu`8("m_IXWX]x &H~D)ykS))S$Lx$(b1y?~>1?qwM I_;d'L7n -0f{ffl@]Z4H)Ov9?(K **"S?8II*@>[G~/8&$vjj6okYtwHgeh^i.>CJr( IvE>]u>WP'T+YROtRP.8W}'4S6IABDn"-t2"^fD$Q4VI;m_&zLn%m(TKlt`'Te+|2 m 7YGA/UxYS{TVRxepJd_hh o4JST}` PD :/;>d+6K|XXj5ab/Bl-5XD ~uzM`U?

View original post here:
Getting to grips with longevity - The Economist

Read More...

High IQ in Childhood Linked to Longevity – Anti Aging News

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

751 0 Posted on Jul 07, 2017, 6 a.m.

Study reveals a correlation between higher childhood intelligence and lower risk of leading causes of death over ones lifetime.

Those who exhibited high intelligence in their childhood years have a reduced lifetime risk for the top causes of death like heart disease, respiratory disease, stroke, dementia and smoking-related cancers. This finding was recently published in The BMJ.

About the Study

A group of University of Edinburgh researchers sought to study the association between IQ scores gauged at 11 years-old and the top causes of death in people upwards of age 79.It is the largest study centered on reporting the causes of death throughout the course of life. The findings show that lifestyle, especially smoking tobacco, is a critically important factor in the effect of IQ on differences in lifespan. Prior studies showed that those with improved intelligence tended to live slightly longer than individuals with less intelligence. However, these studies were mainly based on information derived from male conscripts tracked to the mid-adulthood years.

The findings were derived from data from more than 33,000 men and over 32,000 women born in Scotland back in 1936. These individuals took a childhood intelligence exam at age 11. Their cause of death was identified up to December of 2015. Causes of death for these individuals ranged from stroke to heart disease, digestive disease, cancer, dementia and external causes like suicide or death resulting from an injury.

The Results

Once a number of different factors (age, socioeconomic status, sex) that had the potential to impact the results were accounted for, the research team determined that those whohad a higher childhood IQ score enjoyeda decreased risk of death until the age of 79. As an example, a high score on the childhood IQ test was tied to a 28 percent decrease in risk of death due to respiratory disease. A high score was associated with a 25 percent reduction in risk of death induced by coronary disease. Those who scored high on the childhood IQ test had a 24 percent reduction in risk of death stemming from a stroke.

Other important associations were found for deaths from dementia, digestive disease, injury and cancers related to smoking. There was no association between IQ score and death from cancers that did not relate to smoking.

Why the Study has Merit

Thoughthe study's authors identified study limitations that had the potential to introduce bias, the study is widely considered to be meritorious. The large population sample combined with the 68-year follow-up along with the adjustment for vitally important co-founders gives the study credence. Key associations were intact after additional adjustments for smoking as well as socioeconomic status. This suggests that such factors do not completely account for differences in mortality. Additional studies should consider measures of the cumulative load of these risk factors across the life course.

It can be concluded that childhood intelligence is strongly tied to causes of death that are dependent on previously identified risk factors. The study suggests smoking and its distribution across the socioeconomic spectrum is critically important. Yet it is undetermined if this study tells the whole story or if intelligence indicates something deeper. Perhaps there is a genetic basis to IQ's relation to lifespan.

More:
High IQ in Childhood Linked to Longevity - Anti Aging News

Read More...

Maine woman celebrates 100th birthday, says wine is secret to … – WCSH-TV

Saturday, July 8th, 2017

Bangor woman celebrates big 100

Zach Blanchard, WLBZ 1:48 PM. EDT July 07, 2017

BANGOR, Maine (NEWS CENTER) Florence Bearse celebrated her 100th birthday in Bangor Thursday.

Known for her no-nonsense attitude and sense of humor at the Westgate Center for Rehabilitation, Florence did not shy away from sharing her secret: wine.

I like my wine. Don't take it away from me, she said.

The event was complete with all the fixings, including birthday cake, balloons and gifts.

Bearse said she ran a restaurant in Lagrange where she dedicated her life to serving others.

"The people have taken me I think. They understand me. That I'm crazy, Bearse joked.

Originally from Massachusetts, she said it did not take long to find the beauty of Maine.

"Maine is beautiful. I tell everybody, You want a trip? Go to Maine, she said.

Florence spent much of her time joking around during the party, making faces and laughing.

She even had some advice for those looking to make it as far as she has:

"Don't take any bologna, Bearse said.

2017 WLBZ-TV

Read the original here:
Maine woman celebrates 100th birthday, says wine is secret to ... - WCSH-TV

Read More...

Eating for Longevity: Foods for a Long, Healthy Life

Monday, January 16th, 2017

It Can Help Your Heart continued...

Make sure you have salmon and other fish like trout and herring. Theyre high in omega-3 fatty acids, which help reduce the risk of heart disease and slightly lower blood pressure, among other benefits. Shoot for two servings a week.

You should also know thatthe fiber in veggies -- also found in whole grains -- helps lower your odds of cardiovascular disease. It also helps digestion and regularity, which often are a problem for older adults.

Remember that no one food is going to help your heart, any more than just one would help your brain or your bones or your muscles or any other part of your anatomy.

You need a complete, healthy diet.

If youre eating a lot of fish but, in addition to that, youre living on ice cream and candy and stuff like that, Rock says, its not going to save you.

A loss of memory, a big worry among some older adults, has been linked to, among other things, a lack of vitamin B12. You can get that in:

Alzheimers disease has been linked to chronic inflammation, which can be caused by foods like white bread, french fries, red meat, sugary beverages, and margarine.

The science is still emergingon the relationship between some foods and brain health. Check with your doctor or dietitian.

There was some issue with the Food and Drug Administration disallowing food claims for memory loss, says Adam Drewnowski, the director of the Nutritional Sciences Program at the University of Washington.

I would not want to identify a specific food that prevents memory loss. I probably would tell someone that if you want to be functioning well, then some fruits and antioxidants will do better for you than another slice of cake.

Antioxidants, found in many vegetables and in fruits like blueberries, help reduce inflammation. They also help you get rid of damaging stuff created when you convert food into energy.

Again, though, its important to realize that good brain function may be as much about what you dont eat as what you do.

Originally posted here:
Eating for Longevity: Foods for a Long, Healthy Life

Read More...

Longevity

Tuesday, December 6th, 2016

Turning 40 involves incorporating new mantras in order to survive the day. "Don't sweat the small stuff." That is a really good one and it probably applies to all ages. "Don't cry over spilled milk," ...

When your lips are chapped, your nose is running, and youre trying to save money on your heating bill, the last thing you want to eat is a salad. But that doesnt mean you cant eat a healthy dinner....

During the past 50 years, with increased life expectancy and the impact of feminism, we've witnessed a sea change in our concepts of sexuality, motherhood, and age-appropriate behavior. Feminist Molly...

Suicide is the single biggest killer of men under the age of 45 in the UK. That introduction was my shortest ever, but it really needed to be for such a shockingly large statistic. When I first read i...

You dont need the latest yoga bralette, the fanciest juice cleanse, or a personal trainer to eat healthy, stay fit and sane, keep your house clean the natural way, and be good to the planet. If those...

I am qualified to teach both Yoga and Pilates, and though my preference, by and large, is Yoga, I am going to try and make this as non-biased as possible. I began my Yoga journey 8 years ago but Pilat...

If youre anything like me, you occasionally realize that your closet is full of scratchy, stuffy, too-small shirts, pants, and dresses that you simply never wear. Whether you Konmari it (does this s...

Yoga makes you feel and look more youthful. It literally slows the aging process by stretching the body. Muscles can be developed two ways: by building them up into hard little knots of power, which i...

Ammonia makes you cough and choke, Comet smells like the bathrooms of Miss Hannigans orphanage. But you want to make your home or apartment shine like the top of the Chrysler building! You just want ...

Turning 40 is a milestone. Granted, it isn't as exciting as turning 100, but if you still haven't entered menopause and men still look at you when you pass them on the street, you are in pretty good s...

If you follow any food blogs, youve most likely seen the recent storm of posts about Japanese cheesecake. Food bloggers have quickly fallen in love with it, from its name (cheesecake, whats not to l...

See the original post:
Longevity

Read More...

Longevity myths – Wikipedia

Tuesday, December 6th, 2016

This article is about myths related to the mythology of humans or other beings living to mythological ages. For validated specific supercentenarian claims by modern standards, see List of the verified oldest people. For modern, or complete, unvalidated supercentenarian claims, see Longevity claims.

Longevity myths are traditions about long-lived people (generally supercentenarians), either as individuals or groups of people, and practices that have been believed to confer longevity, but for which scientific evidence does not support the ages claimed or the reasons for the claims.[1][2] While literal interpretations of such myths may appear to indicate extraordinarily long lifespans, many scholars[3] believe such figures may be the result of incorrect translation of numbering systems through various languages coupled by the cultural and or symbolic significance of certain numbers.

The phrase "longevity tradition" may include "purifications, rituals, longevity practices, meditations, and alchemy"[4] that have been believed to confer greater human longevity, especially in Chinese culture.[1][2]

Modern science indicates various ways in which genetics, diet, and lifestyle affect human longevity. It also allows us to determine the age of human remains with a fair degree of precision.

The Hebrew Bible, the Torah, Joshua, Job, and 2 Chronicles mention individuals with lifespans up to the 969 years of Methuselah.

Some apologists[who?] explain these extreme ages as ancient mistranslations that converted the word "month" to "year", mistaking lunar cycles for solar ones: this would turn an age of 969 "years" into a more reasonable 969 lunar months, or 78 years of the Metonic cycle.[5]

Donald Etz says that the Genesis 5 numbers were multiplied by ten by a later editor.[6] These interpretations introduce an inconsistency as the ages of the first nine patriarchs at fatherhood, ranging from 62 to 230 years in the manuscripts, would then be transformed into an implausible range such as 5 to 18 years.[7] Others say that the first list, of only 10 names for 1,656 years, may contain generational gaps, which would have been represented by the lengthy lifetimes attributed to the patriarchs.[8] Nineteenth-century critic Vincent Goehlert suggests the lifetimes "represented epochs merely, to which were given the names of the personages especially prominent in such epochs, who, in consequence of their comparatively long lives, were able to acquire an exalted influence."[9]

Those biblical scholars that teach literal interpretation give explanations for the advanced ages of the early patriarchs. In one view man was originally to have everlasting life, but as sin was introduced into the world by Adam,[10] its influence became greater with each generation and God progressively shortened man's life. [11] In a second view, before Noah's flood, a "firmament" over the earth (Genesis 1:68) contributed to people's advanced ages.[12]

Abraham's wife Sarah is the only woman in the Old Testament whose age is given. She was 127 (Genesis 23:1).

Chapter 2 of Falun Gong by Li Hongzhi (2001) states, "A person in Japan named Mitsu Taira lived to be 242 years old. During the Tang Dynasty in our country, there was a monk called Hui Zhao [, 526815[17]] who lived to be 290 [288/289] years old. According to the county annals of Yong Tai in Fujian Province, Chen Jun [] was born in the first year of Zhong He time (881 AD) under the reign of Emperor Xi Zong during the Tang Dynasty. He died in the Tai Ding time of the Yuan Dynasty (1325 AD), after living for 444 years."[18]

Like Methuselah in Judaism, Bhishma among the Hindus is believed to have lived to a very advanced age and is a metaphor for immortality. His life spans four generations and considering that he fought for his great-nephews in the Mahabharata War who were themselves in their 70s and 80s, it is estimated that Bhishma must have been between 130 and 370 years old at the time of his death.

According to 19th-century scholars, Abdul Azziz al-Hafeed al-Habashi ( ) lived 673/674 Gregorian years or 694/695 Islamic years, from 5811276 of the Hijra.[23]

In Twelver Shiism, Muhammad al-Mahdi is believed to currently be in hiding (Major Occultation) and still alive.

Extreme lifespans are ascribed to the Tirthankaras, For instance, Neminatha was said to have lived for over 10,000 years before his ascension, Naminatha was said to have lived for over 20,000 years before his ascension, Munisuvrata was said to have lived for over 30,000 years before his ascension, Mllntha was said to have lived for over 56,000 years before his ascension, Aranatha was said to have lived for over 84,000 years before his ascension, Kunthunatha was said to have lived for over 100,000 years before his ascension, and Shantinatha was said to have lived even for over 700,000 years before his ascension.[24]

These include claims prior to approximately 150 CE, before the fall of the Roman empire.

A book Macrobii ("Long-livers") is a work devoted to longevity. It was attributed to the ancient Greek author Lucian, although it is now accepted that he could not have written it. Most examples given in it are lifespans of 80 to 100 years, but some are much longer:

Some early emperors of Japan ruled for more than a century, according to the tradition documented in the Kojiki, viz., Emperor Jimmu and Emperor Kan.

The reigns of several shahs in the Shahnameh, an epic poem by Ferdowsi, are given as longer than a century:

In Roman times, Pliny wrote about longevity records from the census carried out in 74 AD under Vespasian. In one region of Italy many people allegedly lived past 100; four were said to be 130, others even older. The ancient Greek author Lucian is the presumed author of Macrobii (long-livers), a work devoted to longevity. Most of the examples Lucian gives are what would be regarded as normal long lifespans (80100 years).

Age claims for the earliest eight Sumerian kings in the major recension of the Sumerian King List were in units and fractions of shar (3,600 years) and totaled 67 shar or 241,200 years.[30]

In the only ten-king tablet recension of this list three kings (Alalngar, [...]kidunnu, and En-men-dur-ana) are recorded as having reigned 72,000 years each.[8][31] The major recension assigns 43,200 years to the reign of En-men-lu-ana, and 36,000 years each to those of Alalngar and Dumuzid.[30]

The first 18 Hng kings of Vietnam were reported to live at least over 200 years each. Their reigns lasted from 2879 BC to 258 BC.

These include longevity claims made in a country or region in the modern era, ordered alphabetically by country or region.

Deaths officially reported in Russia in 1815 listed 1068 centenarians, including 246 supercentenarians (50 at age 120155 and one even older).[34]Time magazine considered that, by the Soviet Union, longevity had elevated to a state-supported "Methuselah cult".[74] The USSR insisted on its citizens' unrivaled longevity by claiming 592 people (224 male, 368 female) over age 120 in a 15 January 1959 census[75] and 100 citizens of Russia alone ages 120 to 156 in March 1960.[76] Such later claims were fostered by Georgian-born Joseph Stalin's apparent hope that he would live long past 70.[74]Zhores A. Medvedev, who demonstrated that all 500-plus claims failed birth-record validation and other tests,[74] said Stalin "liked the idea that [other] Georgians lived to be 100".[76]

Swedish death registers contain detailed information on thousands of centenarians going back to 1749; the maximum age at death reported between 1751 and 1800 was 147.[83]

Swiss anatomist Albrecht von Haller collected examples of 62 people ages 110120, 29 ages 120130, and 15 ages 130140.[85]

Cases of extreme longevity were listed by James Easton in 1799, who covered 1712 cases documented between 66 BCE and 1799, the year of publication;[90] Charles Hulbert also edited a book containing a list of cases in 1825. Some extreme longevity claims include:

A periodical The Aesculapian Register, written by physicians and published in Philadelphia in 1824, listed a number of cases, including several purported to have lived over 130. The authors said the list was taken from the Dublin Magazine.[100]

The idea that certain diets can lead to extraordinary longevity (ages beyond 130) is not new. In 1909, lie Metchnikoff believed that drinking goat's milk could confer extraordinary longevity. The Hunza diet, supposedly practiced in an area of northern Pakistan, has been claimed to give people the ability to live to 140 or more.[108] There has been no proof that any diet has led humans to live longer than the genetically-recognized maximum[citation needed] however Caloric restriction diets have increased lifespans of rodents significantly.

Traditions that have been believed to confer greater human longevity include alchemy.[4]

The Fountain of Youth reputedly restores the youth of anyone who drinks of its waters. The New Testament, following older Jewish tradition, attributes healing to the Pool of Bethesda when the waters are "stirred" by an angel.[112]Herodotus attributes exceptional longevity to a fountain in the land of the Ethiopians.[113] The lore of the Alexander Romance and of Al-Khidr describes such a fountain, and stories about the philosopher's stone, universal panaceas, and the elixir of life are widespread.

After the death of Juan Ponce de Len, Gonzalo Fernndez de Oviedo y Valds wrote in Historia General y Natural de las Indias (1535) that Ponce de Len was looking for the waters of Bimini to cure his aging.[114]

Originally posted here:
Longevity myths - Wikipedia

Read More...

Life extension – Wikipedia

Wednesday, November 30th, 2016

Life extension science, also known as anti-aging medicine, indefinite life extension, experimental gerontology, and biomedical gerontology, is the study of slowing down or reversing the processes of aging to extend both the maximum and average lifespan. Some researchers in this area, and "life extensionists", "immortalists" or "longevists" (those who wish to achieve longer lives themselves), believe that future breakthroughs in tissue rejuvenation, stem cells, regenerative medicine, molecular repair, gene therapy, pharmaceuticals, and organ replacement (such as with artificial organs or xenotransplantations) will eventually enable humans to have indefinite lifespans (agerasia[1]) through complete rejuvenation to a healthy youthful condition.

The sale of purported anti-aging products such as nutrition, physical fitness, skin care, hormone replacements, vitamins, supplements and herbs is a lucrative global industry, with the US market generating about $50billion of revenue each year.[2] Some medical experts state that the use of such products has not been proven to affect the aging process and many claims regarding the efficacy of these marketed products have been roundly criticized by medical experts, including the American Medical Association.[2][3][4][5][6]

The ethical ramifications of life extension are debated by bioethicists.

During the process of aging, an organism accumulates damage to its macromolecules, cells, tissues, and organs. Specifically, aging is characterized as and thought to be caused by "genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication."[7]Oxidation damage to cellular contents caused by free radicals is believed to contribute to aging as well.[8][8][9]

The longest a human has ever been proven to live is 122 years, the case of Jeanne Calment who was born in 1875 and died in 1997, whereas the maximum lifespan of a wildtype mouse, commonly used as a model in research on aging, is about three years.[10] Genetic differences between humans and mice that may account for these different aging rates include differences in efficiency of DNA repair, antioxidant defenses, energy metabolism, proteostasis maintenance, and recycling mechanisms such as autophagy.[11]

Average lifespan in a population is lowered by infant and child mortality, which are frequently linked to infectious diseases or nutrition problems. Later in life, vulnerability to accidents and age-related chronic disease such as cancer or cardiovascular disease play an increasing role in mortality. Extension of expected lifespan can often be achieved by access to improved medical care, vaccinations, good diet, exercise and avoidance of hazards such as smoking.

Maximum lifespan is determined by the rate of aging for a species inherent in its genes and by environmental factors. Widely recognized methods of extending maximum lifespan in model organisms such as nematodes, fruit flies, and mice include caloric restriction, gene manipulation, and administration of pharmaceuticals.[12] Another technique uses evolutionary pressures such as breeding from only older members or altering levels of extrinsic mortality.[13][14] Some animals such as hydra, planarian flatworms, and certain sponges, corals, and jellyfish do not die of old age and exhibit potential immortality.[15][16][17][18]

Theoretically, extension of maximum lifespan in humans could be achieved by reducing the rate of aging damage by periodic replacement of damaged tissues, molecular repair or rejuvenation of deteriorated cells and tissues, reversal of harmful epigenetic changes, or the enhancement of telomerase enzyme activity.[19][20]

Research geared towards life extension strategies in various organisms is currently under way at a number of academic and private institutions. Since 2009, investigators have found ways to increase the lifespan of nematode worms and yeast by 10-fold; the record in nematodes was achieved through genetic engineering and the extension in yeast by a combination of genetic engineering and caloric restriction.[21] A 2009 review of longevity research noted: "Extrapolation from worms to mammals is risky at best, and it cannot be assumed that interventions will result in comparable life extension factors. Longevity gains from dietary restriction, or from mutations studied previously, yield smaller benefits to Drosophila than to nematodes, and smaller still to mammals. This is not unexpected, since mammals have evolved to live many times the worm's lifespan, and humans live nearly twice as long as the next longest-lived primate. From an evolutionary perspective, mammals and their ancestors have already undergone several hundred million years of natural selection favoring traits that could directly or indirectly favor increased longevity, and may thus have already settled on gene sequences that promote lifespan. Moreover, the very notion of a "life-extension factor" that could apply across taxa presumes a linear response rarely seen in biology."[21]

Much life extension research focuses on nutritiondiets or supplementsas a means to extend lifespan, although few of these have been systematically tested for significant longevity effects. The many diets promoted by anti-aging advocates are often contradictory.[original research?] A dietary pattern with some support from scientific research is caloric restriction.[22][23]

Preliminary studies of caloric restriction on humans using surrogate measurements have provided evidence that caloric restriction may have powerful protective effect against secondary aging in humans. Caloric restriction in humans may reduce the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis.[24]

The free-radical theory of aging suggests that antioxidant supplements, such as vitaminC, vitaminE, Q10, lipoic acid, carnosine, and N-acetylcysteine, might extend human life. However, combined evidence from several clinical trials suggest that -carotene supplements and high doses of vitaminE increase mortality rates.[25]Resveratrol is a sirtuin stimulant that has been shown to extend life in animal models, but the effect of resveratrol on lifespan in humans is unclear as of 2011.[26]

There are many traditional herbs purportedly used to extend the health-span, including a Chinese tea called Jiaogulan (Gynostemma pentaphyllum), dubbed "China's Immortality Herb."[27]Ayurveda, the traditional Indian system of medicine, describes a class of longevity herbs called rasayanas, including Bacopa monnieri, Ocimum sanctum, Curcuma longa, Centella asiatica, Phyllanthus emblica, Withania somnifera and many others.[27]

The anti-aging industry offers several hormone therapies. Some of these have been criticized for possible dangers to the patient and a lack of proven effect. For example, the American Medical Association has been critical of some anti-aging hormone therapies.[2]

Although some recent clinical studies have shown that low-dose growth hormone (GH) treatment for adults with GH deficiency changes the body composition by increasing muscle mass, decreasing fat mass, increasing bone density and muscle strength, improves cardiovascular parameters (i.e. decrease of LDL cholesterol), and affects the quality of life without significant side effects,[28][29][30] the evidence for use of growth hormone as an anti-aging therapy is mixed and based on animal studies. There are mixed reports that GH or IGF-1 signaling modulates the aging process in humans and about whether the direction of its effect is positive or negative.[31]

Some critics dispute the portrayal of aging as a disease. For example, Leonard Hayflick, who determined that fibroblasts are limited to around 50cell divisions, reasons that aging is an unavoidable consequence of entropy. Hayflick and fellow biogerontologists Jay Olshansky and Bruce Carnes have strongly criticized the anti-aging industry in response to what they see as unscrupulous profiteering from the sale of unproven anti-aging supplements.[4]

Politics relevant to the substances of life extension pertain mostly to communications and availability.[citation needed]

In the United States, product claims on food and drug labels are strictly regulated. The First Amendment (freedom of speech) protects third-party publishers' rights to distribute fact, opinion and speculation on life extension practices. Manufacturers and suppliers also provide informational publications, but because they market the substances, they are subject to monitoring and enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which polices claims by marketers. What constitutes the difference between truthful and false claims is hotly debated and is a central controversy in this arena.[citation needed]

Research by Sobh and Martin (2011) suggests that people buy anti-aging products to obtain a hoped-for self (e.g., keeping a youthful skin) or to avoid a feared-self (e.g., looking old). The research shows that when consumers pursue a hoped-for self, it is expectations of success that most strongly drive their motivation to use the product. The research also shows why doing badly when trying to avoid a feared self is more motivating than doing well. Interestingly, when product use is seen to fail it is more motivating than success when consumers seek to avoid a feared-self.[32]

The best-characterized anti-aging therapy was, and still is, CR. In some studies calorie restriction has been shown to extend the life of mice, yeast, and rhesus monkeys significantly.[33][34] However, a more recent study has shown that in contrast, calorie restriction has not improved the survival rate in rhesus monkeys.[35] Long-term human trials of CR are now being done. It is the hope of the anti-aging researchers that resveratrol, found in grapes, or pterostilbene, a more bio-available substance, found in blueberries, as well as rapamycin, a biotic substance discovered on Easter Island, may act as CR mimetics to increase the life span of humans.[36]

More recent work reveals that the effects long attributed to caloric restriction may be obtained by restriction of protein alone, and specifically of just the sulfur-containing amino acids cysteine and methionine.[37][38] Current research is into the metabolic pathways affected by variation in availability of products of these amino acids.

There are a number of chemicals intended to slow the aging process currently being studied in animal models.[39] One type of research is related to the observed effects a calorie restriction (CR) diet, which has been shown to extend lifespan in some animals[40] Based on that research, there have been attempts to develop drugs that will have the same effect on the aging process as a caloric restriction diet, which are known as Caloric restriction mimetic drugs. Some drugs that are already approved for other uses have been studied for possible longevity effects on laboratory animals because of a possible CR-mimic effect; they include rapamycin,[41]metformin and other geroprotectors.[42]MitoQ, Resveratrol and pterostilbene are dietary supplements that have also been studied in this context.[36][43][44]

Other attempts to create anti-aging drugs have taken different research paths. One notable direction of research has been research into the possibility of using the enzyme telomerase in order to counter the process of telomere shortening.[45] However, there are potential dangers in this, since some research has also linked telomerase to cancer and to tumor growth and formation.[46]

Future advances in nanomedicine could give rise to life extension through the repair of many processes thought to be responsible for aging. K. Eric Drexler, one of the founders of nanotechnology, postulated cell repair machines, including ones operating within cells and utilizing as yet hypothetical molecular computers, in his 1986 book Engines of Creation. Raymond Kurzweil, a futurist and transhumanist, stated in his book The Singularity Is Near that he believes that advanced medical nanorobotics could completely remedy the effects of aging by 2030.[47] According to Richard Feynman, it was his former graduate student and collaborator Albert Hibbs who originally suggested to him (circa 1959) the idea of a medical use for Feynman's theoretical micromachines (see nanotechnology). Hibbs suggested that certain repair machines might one day be reduced in size to the point that it would, in theory, be possible to (as Feynman put it) "swallow the doctor". The idea was incorporated into Feynman's 1959 essay There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom.[48]

Some life extensionists suggest that therapeutic cloning and stem cell research could one day provide a way to generate cells, body parts, or even entire bodies (generally referred to as reproductive cloning) that would be genetically identical to a prospective patient. Recently, the US Department of Defense initiated a program to research the possibility of growing human body parts on mice.[49] Complex biological structures, such as mammalian joints and limbs, have not yet been replicated. Dog and primate brain transplantation experiments were conducted in the mid-20th century but failed due to rejection and the inability to restore nerve connections. As of 2006, the implantation of bio-engineered bladders grown from patients' own cells has proven to be a viable treatment for bladder disease.[50] Proponents of body part replacement and cloning contend that the required biotechnologies are likely to appear earlier than other life-extension technologies.

The use of human stem cells, particularly embryonic stem cells, is controversial. Opponents' objections generally are based on interpretations of religious teachings or ethical considerations. Proponents of stem cell research point out that cells are routinely formed and destroyed in a variety of contexts. Use of stem cells taken from the umbilical cord or parts of the adult body may not provoke controversy.[51]

The controversies over cloning are similar, except general public opinion in most countries stands in opposition to reproductive cloning. Some proponents of therapeutic cloning predict the production of whole bodies, lacking consciousness, for eventual brain transplantation.

Replacement of biological (susceptible to diseases) organs with mechanical ones could extend life. This is the goal of 2045 Initiative.[52]

For cryonicists (advocates of cryopreservation), storing the body at low temperatures after death may provide an "ambulance" into a future in which advanced medical technologies may allow resuscitation and repair. They speculate cryogenic temperatures will minimize changes in biological tissue for many years, giving the medical community ample time to cure all disease, rejuvenate the aged and repair any damage that is caused by the cryopreservation process.

Many cryonicists do not believe that legal death is "real death" because stoppage of heartbeat and breathingthe usual medical criteria for legal deathoccur before biological death of cells and tissues of the body. Even at room temperature, cells may take hours to die and days to decompose. Although neurological damage occurs within 46 minutes of cardiac arrest, the irreversible neurodegenerative processes do not manifest for hours.[53] Cryonicists state that rapid cooling and cardio-pulmonary support applied immediately after certification of death can preserve cells and tissues for long-term preservation at cryogenic temperatures. People, particularly children, have survived up to an hour without heartbeat after submersion in ice water. In one case, full recovery was reported after 45 minutes underwater.[54] To facilitate rapid preservation of cells and tissue, cryonics "standby teams" are available to wait by the bedside of patients who are to be cryopreserved to apply cooling and cardio-pulmonary support as soon as possible after declaration of death.[55]

No mammal has been successfully cryopreserved and brought back to life, with the exception of frozen human embryos. Resuscitation of a postembryonic human from cryonics is not possible with current science. Some scientists still support the idea based on their expectations of the capabilities of future science.[56][57]

Another proposed life extension technology would combine existing and predicted future biochemical and genetic techniques. SENS proposes that rejuvenation may be obtained by removing aging damage via the use of stem cells and tissue engineering, telomere-lengthening machinery, allotopic expression of mitochondrial proteins, targeted ablation of cells, immunotherapeutic clearance, and novel lysosomal hydrolases.[58]

While many biogerontologists find these ideas "worthy of discussion"[59][60] and SENS conferences feature important research in the field,[61][62] some contend that the alleged benefits are too speculative given the current state of technology, referring to it as "fantasy rather than science".[3][5]

Gene therapy, in which nucleic acid polymers are delivered as a drug and are either expressed as proteins, interfere with the expression of proteins, or correct genetic mutations, has been proposed as a future strategy to prevent aging.[63][64]

A large array of genetic modifications have been found to increase lifespan in model organisms such as yeast, nematode worms, fruit flies, and mice. As of 2013, the longest extension of life caused by a single gene manipulation was roughly 150% in mice and 10-fold in nematode worms.[65]

In The Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins describes an approach to life-extension that involves "fooling genes" into thinking the body is young.[66] Dawkins attributes inspiration for this idea to Peter Medawar. The basic idea is that our bodies are composed of genes that activate throughout our lifetimes, some when we are young and others when we are older. Presumably, these genes are activated by environmental factors, and the changes caused by these genes activating can be lethal. It is a statistical certainty that we possess more lethal genes that activate in later life than in early life. Therefore, to extend life, we should be able to prevent these genes from switching on, and we should be able to do so by "identifying changes in the internal chemical environment of a body that take place during aging... and by simulating the superficial chemical properties of a young body".[67]

According to some lines of thinking, the ageing process is routed into a basic reduction of biological complexity,[68] and thus loss of information. In order to reverse this loss, gerontologist Marios Kyriazis suggested that it is necessary to increase input of actionable and meaningful information both individually (into individual brains),[69] and collectively (into societal systems).[70] This technique enhances overall biological function through up-regulation of immune, hormonal, antioxidant and other parameters, resulting in improved age-repair mechanisms. Working in parallel with natural evolutionary mechanisms that can facilitate survival through increased fitness, Kryiazis claims that the technique may lead to a reduction of the rate of death as a function of age, i.e. indefinite lifespan.[71]

One hypothetical future strategy that, as some suggest, "eliminates" the complications related to a physical body, involves the copying or transferring (e.g. by progressively replacing neurons with transistors) of a conscious mind from a biological brain to a non-biological computer system or computational device. The basic idea is to scan the structure of a particular brain in detail, and then construct a software model of it that is so faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain.[72] Whether or not an exact copy of one's mind constitutes actual life extension is matter of debate.

The extension of life has been a desire of humanity and a mainstay motif in the history of scientific pursuits and ideas throughout history, from the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh and the Egyptian Smith medical papyrus, all the way through the Taoists, Ayurveda practitioners, alchemists, hygienists such as Luigi Cornaro, Johann Cohausen and Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland, and philosophers such as Francis Bacon, Ren Descartes, Benjamin Franklin and Nicolas Condorcet. However, the beginning of the modern period in this endeavor can be traced to the end of the 19th beginning of the 20th century, to the so-called fin-de-sicle (end of the century) period, denoted as an end of an epoch and characterized by the rise of scientific optimism and therapeutic activism, entailing the pursuit of life extension (or life-extensionism). Among the foremost researchers of life extension at this period were the Nobel Prize winning biologist Elie Metchnikoff (1845-1916) -- the author of the cell theory of immunity and vice director of Institut Pasteur in Paris, and Charles-douard Brown-Squard (1817-1894) -- the president of the French Biological Society and one of the founders of modern endocrinology.[73]

Sociologist James Hughes claims that science has been tied to a cultural narrative of conquering death since the Age of Enlightenment. He cites Francis Bacon (15611626) as an advocate of using science and reason to extend human life, noting Bacon's novel New Atlantis, wherein scientists worked toward delaying aging and prolonging life. Robert Boyle (16271691), founding member of the Royal Society, also hoped that science would make substantial progress with life extension, according to Hughes, and proposed such experiments as "to replace the blood of the old with the blood of the young". Biologist Alexis Carrel (18731944) was inspired by a belief in indefinite human lifespan that he developed after experimenting with cells, says Hughes.[74]

In 1970, the American Aging Association was formed under the impetus of Denham Harman, originator of the free radical theory of aging. Harman wanted an organization of biogerontologists that was devoted to research and to the sharing of information among scientists interested in extending human lifespan.

In 1976, futurists Joel Kurtzman and Philip Gordon wrote No More Dying. The Conquest Of Aging And The Extension Of Human Life, (ISBN 0-440-36247-4) the first popular book on research to extend human lifespan. Subsequently, Kurtzman was invited to testify before the House Select Committee on Aging, chaired by Claude Pepper of Florida, to discuss the impact of life extension on the Social Security system.

Saul Kent published The Life Extension Revolution (ISBN 0-688-03580-9) in 1980 and created a nutraceutical firm called the Life Extension Foundation, a non-profit organization that promotes dietary supplements. The Life Extension Foundation publishes a periodical called Life Extension Magazine. The 1982 bestselling book Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach (ISBN 0-446-51229-X) by Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw further popularized the phrase "life extension".

In 1983, Roy Walford, a life-extensionist and gerontologist, published a popular book called Maximum Lifespan. In 1988, Walford and his student Richard Weindruch summarized their research into the ability of calorie restriction to extend the lifespan of rodents in The Retardation of Aging and Disease by Dietary Restriction (ISBN 0-398-05496-7). It had been known since the work of Clive McCay in the 1930s that calorie restriction can extend the maximum lifespan of rodents. But it was the work of Walford and Weindruch that gave detailed scientific grounding to that knowledge.[citation needed] Walford's personal interest in life extension motivated his scientific work and he practiced calorie restriction himself. Walford died at the age of 80 from complications caused by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Money generated by the non-profit Life Extension Foundation allowed Saul Kent to finance the Alcor Life Extension Foundation, the world's largest cryonics organization. The cryonics movement had been launched in 1962 by Robert Ettinger's book, The Prospect of Immortality. In the 1960s, Saul Kent had been a co-founder of the Cryonics Society of New York. Alcor gained national prominence when baseball star Ted Williams was cryonically preserved by Alcor in 2002 and a family dispute arose as to whether Williams had really wanted to be cryopreserved.

Regulatory and legal struggles between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Life Extension Foundation included seizure of merchandise and court action. In 1991, Saul Kent and Bill Faloon, the principals of the Foundation, were jailed. The LEF accused the FDA of perpetrating a "Holocaust" and "seeking gestapo-like power" through its regulation of drugs and marketing claims.[75]

In 2003, Doubleday published "The Immortal Cell: One Scientist's Quest to Solve the Mystery of Human Aging," by Michael D. West. West emphasised the potential role of embryonic stem cells in life extension.[76]

Other modern life extensionists include writer Gennady Stolyarov, who insists that death is "the enemy of us all, to be fought with medicine, science, and technology";[77]transhumanist philosopher Zoltan Istvan, who proposes that the "transhumanist must safeguard one's own existence above all else";[78] futurist George Dvorsky, who considers aging to be a problem that desperately needs to be solved;[79] and recording artist Steve Aoki, who has been called "one of the most prolific campaigners for life extension".[80]

In 1991, the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine (A4M) was formed as a non-profit organization to create what it considered an anti-aging medical specialty distinct from geriatrics, and to hold trade shows for physicians interested in anti-aging medicine. The A4M trains doctors in anti-aging medicine and publicly promotes the field of anti-aging research. It has about 26,000 members, of whom about 97% are doctors and scientists.[81] The American Board of Medical Specialties recognizes neither anti-aging medicine nor the A4M's professional standing.[82]

In 2003, Aubrey de Grey and David Gobel formed the Methuselah Foundation, which gives financial grants to anti-aging research projects. In 2009, de Grey and several others founded the SENS Research Foundation, a California-based scientific research organization which conducts research into aging and funds other anti-aging research projects at various universities.[83] In 2013, Google announced Calico, a new company based in San Francisco that will harness new technologies to increase scientific understanding of the biology of aging.[84] It is led by Arthur D. Levinson,[85] and its research team includes scientists such as Hal V. Barron, David Botstein, and Cynthia Kenyon. In 2014, biologist Craig Venter founded Human Longevity Inc., a company dedicated to scientific research to end aging through genomics and cell therapy. They received funding with the goal of compiling a comprehensive human genotype, microbiome, and phenotype database.[86]

Aside from private initiatives, aging research is being conducted in university laboratories, and includes universities such as Harvard and UCLA. University researchers have made a number of breakthroughs in extending the lives of mice and insects by reversing certain aspects of aging.[87][88][89][90]

Though many scientists state[91] that life extension and radical life extension are possible, there are still no international or national programs focused on radical life extension. There are political forces staying for and against life extension. By 2012, in Russia, the United States, Israel, and the Netherlands, the Longevity political parties started. They aimed to provide political support to radical life extension research and technologies, and ensure the fastest possible and at the same time soft transition of society to the next step life without aging and with radical life extension, and to provide access to such technologies to most currently living people.[92]

Leon Kass (chairman of the US President's Council on Bioethics from 2001 to 2005) has questioned whether potential exacerbation of overpopulation problems would make life extension unethical.[93] He states his opposition to life extension with the words:

"simply to covet a prolonged life span for ourselves is both a sign and a cause of our failure to open ourselves to procreation and to any higher purpose ... [The] desire to prolong youthfulness is not only a childish desire to eat one's life and keep it; it is also an expression of a childish and narcissistic wish incompatible with devotion to posterity."[94]

John Harris, former editor-in-chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, argues that as long as life is worth living, according to the person himself, we have a powerful moral imperative to save the life and thus to develop and offer life extension therapies to those who want them.[95]

Transhumanist philosopher Nick Bostrom has argued that any technological advances in life extension must be equitably distributed and not restricted to a privileged few.[96] In an extended metaphor entitled "The Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant", Bostrom envisions death as a monstrous dragon who demands human sacrifices. In the fable, after a lengthy debate between those who believe the dragon is a fact of life and those who believe the dragon can and should be destroyed, the dragon is finally killed. Bostrom argues that political inaction allowed many preventable human deaths to occur.[97]

Life extension is a controversial topic due to fear of overpopulation and possible effects on society.[98] Biogerontologist Aubrey De Grey counters the overpopulation critique by pointing out that the therapy could postpone or eliminate menopause, allowing women to space out their pregnancies over more years and thus decreasing the yearly population growth rate.[99] Moreover, the philosopher and futurist Max More argues that, given the fact the worldwide population growth rate is slowing down and is projected to eventually stabilize and begin falling, superlongevity would be unlikely to contribute to overpopulation.[98]

A Spring 2013 Pew Research poll in the United States found that 38% of Americans would want life extension treatments, and 56% would reject it. However, it also found that 68% believed most people would want it and that only 4% consider an "ideal lifespan" to be more than 120 years. The median "ideal lifespan" was 91 years of age and the majority of the public (63%) viewed medical advances aimed at prolonging life as generally good. 41% of Americans believed that radical life extension (RLE) would be good for society, while 51% said they believed it would be bad for society.[100] One possibility for why 56% of Americans claim they would reject life extension treatments may be due to the cultural perception that living longer would result in a longer period of decrepitude, and that the elderly in our current society are unhealthy.[101]

Religious people are no more likely to oppose life extension than the unaffiliated,[100] though some variation exists between religious denominations.

Most mainstream medical organizations and practitioners do not consider aging to be a disease. David Sinclair says: "Idon't see aging as a disease, but as a collection of quite predictable diseases caused by the deterioration of the body".[102] The two main arguments used are that aging is both inevitable and universal while diseases are not.[103] However, not everyone agrees. Harry R. Moody, Director of Academic Affairs for AARP, notes that what is normal and what is disease strongly depends on a historical context.[104] David Gems, Assistant Director of the Institute of Healthy Ageing, strongly argues that aging should be viewed as a disease.[105] In response to the universality of aging, David Gems notes that it is as misleading as arguing that Basenji are not dogs because they do not bark.[106] Because of the universality of aging he calls it a 'special sort of disease'. Robert M. Perlman, coined the terms aging syndrome and disease complex in 1954 to describe aging.[107]

The discussion whether aging should be viewed as a disease or not has important implications. It would stimulate pharmaceutical companies to develop life extension therapies and in the United States of America, it would also increase the regulation of the anti-aging market by the FDA. Anti-aging now falls under the regulations for cosmetic medicine which are less tight than those for drugs.[106][108]

Originally posted here:
Life extension - Wikipedia

Read More...

Fight Aging! Reports from the front line in the fight …

Sunday, November 27th, 2016

Linking Excess Fat Tissue, Immune Dysfunction, and Cellular Senescence in Aging

Loading...

Cellular senescence is one of the root causes of aging, and there are at present serious, well-funded efforts underway to produce rejuvenation therapies based on the selective destruction of senescent cells in old tissues. This progress is welcome, but it could have started a long time ago. It has taken many years of advocacy and the shoestring production of technology demonstrations to finally convince the broader community of scientists and funding institutions that the evidence has long merited serious investment in treatments to clear senescent cells. This is what it is, and now we must look to the future, for all that it has been a long, uphill battle. Cellular senescence is today having its time in the sun. Many research groups are linking the mechanisms of senescence to other aspects of aging; senescent cells are showing up in many more research papers than in past years, now that there is more of a scientific and financial incentive to search carefully for their influence. I think that declaring cellular senescence to be the causal nexus of aging, as one research group did, is going overboard a little, as there are, after all, other independent causes of aging, forms of metabolic waste and damage that would cause death and disease even if cellular senescence did not exist. Nonetheless, it is gratify to watch the spreading realization that cellular senescence plays a role in many areas of health and biology associated with aging. The advent of therapies that can remove senescent cells promises to produce sweeping beneficial effects on aging and disease.

There is a set of fairly well established threads of research that link aging with visceral fat tissue and immune dysfunction in the form of chronic inflammation. Visceral fat produces an accelerated pace of aging by generating greater chronic inflammation, producing an hostile tissue environment of inappropriate signals that attract immune cells and then cause those cells to become dysfunctional. The more fat there is the more inflammation it creates. This is thought to be the primary mechanism by which obesity increases the risk and severity of age-related disease. All of the common age-related diseases are accelerated in their progression by higher levels of chronic inflammation. The material difference between a lot of fat and a normal amount of fat is well demonstrated by a study in which researchers produced life extension in mice through surgical removal of visceral fat, but there is a mountain of data on human health to show that people who are overweight will suffer a shorter life expectancy and more age-related illness, and that this effect scales by the amount of excess fat tissue. How do senescent cells fit into this picture? One of the characteristic features of senescent cells is that they produce greater levels of chronic inflammation via the secretion of signal molecules such as cytokines. Of late, researchers have shown that senescent cells are found in the immune system, as in other cell populations. Given this, it should not be a surprise to find that cellular senescence can be implicated in the way in which visceral fat accelerates aging: their presence in visceral fat tissue and the immune cells interacting with that tissue fits right in with the broader picture of inflammation and bad cellular behavior.

Obesity accelerates T cell senescence in murine visceral adipose tissue

Visceral obesity is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and a sustained whole-body proinflammatory state, which may underlie metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. VAT inflammation associated with obesity involves a complex network of responses of immune cell components, including acquired immune cells such as various subsets of T cells and B cells and innate immune cells such as macrophages. Among these cells, CD4+ T cells have been recognized as a central regulator of chronic VAT inflammation. The number of CD4+ T cells in VAT increases as the tissue expands in obesity. Factors that drive CD4+ T cell expansion and into proinflammatory effectors in VAT during the development of high-fat diet-induced (HFD-induced) obesity may include MHC class II-associated antigens, possibly self-peptides, because the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of CD4+ T cells in VAT is limited, and deficiency of MHC class II protects mice from high fat diet (HFD)-induced VAT inflammation and insulin resistance. However, the obesity-associated immune background underlying chronic inflammation in VAT remains elusive.

Significant changes occur in the overall T cell populations with age. In CD4+ T cells, proportions of naive (CD44loCD62Lhi) cells sharply decline in ontogeny, with an age-dependent increase in cells of the memory phenotype (CD44hiCD62Llo). Among CD44hiCD4+ T cells, a unique population expressing programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and CD153 actually increases with age in mice. The CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cell population shows compromised proliferation and regular T cell cytokine production on T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation but secretes large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, such as osteopontin. These CD4+ T cells also show signatures of cell senescence, including a marked increase in senescence-related gene expression and nuclear heterochromatin foci, and are termed senescence-associated T cells (SA-T cells). Notably, the age-dependent development of SA-T cells, which may include autoreactive cells, is dependent on B cells. As such, the increase in SA-T cells is suggested to be involved in part in immune aging phenotypes such as impaired acquired immune capacity, increased proinflammatory traits, and high risk for autoimmunity.

In the present study, we demonstrate that CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cells are remarkably increased and preferentially accumulated in the VAT of HFD-fed mice in a B cell-dependent manner and that these CD4+ T cells show functional and genetic features strongly resembling SA-T cells that increase in secondary lymphoid tissues with age. We also indicate that the CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cells play a crucial role in inducing chronic VAT inflammation and metabolic disorder via secretion of large amounts of osteopontin. We demonstrated that adoptive transfer of CD153+PD-1+CD44hiCD4+ T cells, but not other CD4+ T cells, from HFD-fed spleens into VAT of ND-fed mice recapitulates the features of VAT inflammation, including a striking increase in CD11chiCD206lo macrophages and expression of proinflammatory cytokine genes. It is noteworthy that CD153+PD-1+CD4+ T cells in VAT of HFD-fed mice show features indistinguishable from those of CD153+ SA-T cells, which gradually increase systemically with age. The age-dependent increase in CD153+ SA-T cells may partly underlie the immune aging, including a reduction in acquired immunity and an increase in the inflammatory trait and autoimmunity risk. Obesity is also associated with diminished resistance against infection, chronic low-grade inflammation, and a greater susceptibility to autoimmunity. It has been suggested that the increase in CD153+ SA-T cells in chronological aging and systemic autoimmunity is attributable to a robust, homeostatic T cell proliferation, but the precise mechanism underlying the accumulation of these T cells in VAT of HFD-fed mice remains to be investigated. Nonetheless, it is an intriguing possibility that the predisposition often associated with obesity may partly be a systemic manifestation of the premature increase in CD153+ SA-T cells in VAT, since adipose tissues can constitute up to 50% to 60% of total BW in severe obesity.

Loading...

Both birds and bats have great longevity for their size in comparison to mammalian species that do not fly, which has led researchers to theorize that the metabolic demands of flight lead to the evolution of cell structures that are more resistant to the damage of aging. Energy metabolism revolves around the mitochondria, the power plants of the cells, and so this in turn points to an important role for mitochondrial function and damage to mitochondria in determining aging and longevity, both across species and in individuals. There are good correlations between mitochondrial composition, the degree to which mitochondrial structures can resist oxidative damage, and mammalian life span, for example. Researchers here take a more reductionist approach to the question of why bats are exceptionally long-lived, and begin by mapping the RNA of a bat species:

Of all mammals, bats possess some of the most unique and peculiar adaptations that render them as excellent models to investigate the mechanisms of extended longevity and potentially halted senescence. They are considered the 'Methusalehs' among mammals due to their exceptional and surprising longevity given their body size and metabolic rate. Typically mammals that are small have a high metabolic rate (e.g. shrews) and do not live for a long time. However, despite their small size and high metabolic rate bats can live for an exceptionally long time, with the oldest recorded Brandt's bat (wild caught as an adult) ever recaptured being more than 41 years old with a body weight of 7 grams. Indeed, to get a positive correlation between longevity and body size in mammals, bats must be removed from the analyses. By comparing the ratio of expected longevity to that predicted from the 'non-bat placental mammal' regression line (longevity quotient - LQ) only 19 species of mammals are longer lived than man, one of these species being the naked mole rat and the other 18 are bats. This suggests that bats have some underlying mechanisms that may explain their exceptional longevity.

MicroRNA (miRNA) are a subset of short endogenous non-coding RNA that play a significant role in post-transcriptional regulation, via repression of translation. Since the first miRNA was discovered in 1993, a multitude of miRNA have subsequently been identified, and implicated in the regulation of the vast majority of biological pathways including cell cycle regulation, metabolism, tumorigenesis, as well as immune response. However, the role of miRNA regulation in mammalian ageing and the onset of age-related diseases has only recently been established. In mammals, various miRNA have been shown to be differentially expressed during ageing, most of which appear to be generally tissue-specific. In addition to tissue-specific ageing, it is increasingly evident that many miRNA regulate gene expressions in well-known ageing pathways, most notably in the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway.

Despite being the second largest order of mammals (~1200 species), there is a scarcity of genomic and transcriptomic bat resources. To date, only five well-annotated bat genomes are publically available. Phylogenomic studies of bat genomes and other mammalian species reveal that a number of genes are under positive selection in bats. These genic adaptations have been correlated with traits such as echolocation, powered flight, hibernation, immunity and longevity. For example, specific non-synonymous mutations in GHR and IGF1R, key ageing-related genes, were detected in several long-lived vespertilionid bats (M. brandtii, M. lucifugus and Eptesicus fuscus), while a large proportion of genes involved in DNA repair (RAD50, KU80, MDM2, etc.) and the NF-B pathway (c-REL and ATM2, etc.) were reported to be under positive or divergent selection in M. davidii and P. alecto. These results suggest bats may better detect and repair DNA damage. Intriguingly, positive selection was also detected in mitochondrial-encoded and nuclear-encoded oxidative phosphorylation genes in bats, which may explain their efficient energy metabolism necessary for flight. Apart from comparative genome analysis, only a small number of transcriptomic studies on bats using have been carried out, focused primarily on the characteristics of hibernation, immunity, echolocation and phylogeny. However, the molecular mechanisms of adaptations affecting longevity are still far from understood, especially with respect to gene regulation.

In the present study, we sequenced six small RNA libraries from whole blood sampled from wild-caught greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis) and for the first time made genome-wide comparisons of both miRNomes and mRNA transcriptomes between bat and non-bat mammalian species (human, pig and cow). The profiling of the M. myotis blood miRNome showed a large number of bat-specific miRNA involved in regulating important pathways related to immunity, tumorigenesis and ageing. Comparative analyses of both miRNomes and transcriptomes also revealed distinctive longevity mechanisms in bats. Several up-regulated miRNA possibly act as tumor suppressors. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed protein-coding genes showed that up-regulated genes in bats compared to other mammals were mainly involved in mitotic cell cycle and DNA damage repair pathways while a high number of down-regulated genes were enriched in mitochondrial metabolism. The results and data presented here show unique regulatory mechanisms for protection against tumorigenesis, reduced oxidative stress, and robust DNA repair systems, likely contribute to the extraordinary longevity of bats.

Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3227-8

Loading...

Very few genetic variants robustly correlate with longevity across different study populations, and those that do, such as variants of APOE and FOXO3A, have small effects, only visible in the mortality statistics of large numbers of people. This indicates that the genetics of longevity, the way in which variations in metabolism and the response to high levels of age-related cell and tissue damage in later life can produce modestly different mortality rates, is a matter of many thousands of tiny, interacting contributions, very sensitive to environmental factors. It appears ever less likely that there will be any easy, small number of genetic changes that can be made to humans in order to produce significant lengthening of life. Thus the study of genetics and longevity isn't the place to be looking for cost-effective ways to produce radical life extension of decades and more. This paper is one of many recent illustrations of this point; none of the described problems would be anywhere near as much of a challenge if there was a large genetic effect on aging and longevity with simple, narrow origins there to be found. That would stand out from the data much more readily.

The results of many genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of complex traits suffer from a lack of replication. Differences in population genetic structures among study populations are considered to be possible contributors to this problem. One aspect of population structure - the differences in genetic frequencies among subgroups of individuals comprising the population - was traditionally linked with the effects of population stratification. Another one - the presence of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in many parts of the human genome including those that contain causal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - was actively exploited in GWAS of complex traits. Methods of fine mapping following the "discovery" phase are used for evaluating causal SNPs. One could expect that the non-replication problem due to differences in LD patterns among study populations in GWAS would disappear if the detected marker SNP is a causal one, i.e., if it contributes to the variability of a trait. It turns out that the differences in LD levels around a functional SNP may still contribute to the non-replication problem.

The estimated associations in this case depend on whether the detected functional SNP is in LD with another functional SNP, the effects of these SNPs on the trait in the absence of LD (pure effects), and on the level of LD between corresponding SNP loci. This property has important consequences for interpretation of the results of genetic analyses of complex traits. In the presence of LD the estimated effects of a causal SNP may be spurious and may incorrectly characterize the biological relationships between the SNP and the trait. In contrast the pure effect of a given causal SNP estimated in the absence of LD with other such SNPs may correctly characterize the biological connections between the SNP and the trait. Therefore, for example, performing genetic analyses of African populations (that have lower levels of LD patterns for many SNP pairs than populations of European origin) has the potential to reduce bias in the estimated effects of functional SNPs on a trait caused by the presence of LD between functional loci. This condition is, however, not sufficient because of the possible presence of hidden gene/gene interaction effects, gene/environment correlations, and gene/environment interaction effects.

Human lifespan and many other aging, health and longevity related traits are multifactorial phenotypes, that is, they are affected by many genetic and non-genetic factors. The relationships between genes and these phenotypes have special features that distinguish them from other complex traits, influence methods of their genetic analyses, and affect the interpretation of the research results. The genetic variants that influence aging, health, and longevity related traits generate age dependent changes in the population genetic structure, i.e., changes in the frequencies of genetic variants and in the levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among them. This feature has important implications for studies focused on the replication of GWAS research findings: independent populations involved in such studies often have different genetic structures, due in part to the differences in the population age distribution at the time of biospecimen collection. As a result, the frequencies of the genetic variants associated with these traits and their LD patterns may differ even if the genetic structures in the corresponding population cohorts were the same at birth.

Detecting statistically significant associations of genetic variants with complex traits is not the end of the genetic analyses. One reason is that the relationship between a detected marker SNP and the complex trait of interest is not, necessarily, a causal one. More often these relationships serve as proxies for the real effect of some unobserved causal SNPs (due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the marker and causal SNPs), and, hence, do not have a direct biological effect on the phenotype. To generate insights about the biological mechanisms responsible for the trait's variability one has to identify the causal SNPs responsible for the association signal. To identify such SNPs a number of efficient fine-mapping procedures have been recommended. The main limitation of existing methods is that they seek to identify a single causal variant which is independent of (not in LD with) other causal variants. Since this is not sufficiently realistic, a new approach that allows for efficient detection of multiple causal variants has been proposed. The case where two or more causal SNPs are in LD creates additional problems for interpretation of the results of genetic association studies.

In this paper we show that the estimates of the effects of a causal SNP on lifespan depend on the genetic structure of the population under study (e.g., the level of LD of the SNP with other causal SNPs). Genetic association studies of this trait using data from populations with different LD levels are likely to produce different results. We show that differences in population genetic structures can explain why genetic variants favorable for longevity in one population appear as harmful risk factors in another population. Population structure may also be responsible for the age-specific effects of genetic variants on mortality risk. Differences in genetic structures in distinct populations may be responsible for the low level of replicability of GWAS of human aging, health, and longevity related traits.

Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2016.00188

Loading...

I stumbled upon an interesting open access paper a few days ago, linked below, in which the authors present their view of immunosenescence, the age-related failure of the immune system, as being in part a process wherein some cells of the adaptive immune system change their characteristics and function to become more like innate immune system cells. It makes for interesting reading, though it is worth bearing in mind that the immune system as a whole is fantastically complex, and in many ways still a dark and unmapped forest. It is easy to theorize unopposed when there is such a lot of empty space remaining on the map, making it hard to argue concretely about the relative importance of various mechanisms and observations. This poor understanding of the intricacies of the immune system is why autoimmune diseases and immune aging are largely lacking in effective treatments, and why the best of the prospective cures are those that sidestep the entire question of specific causes and mechanisms in face of the Gordian strategy of destroying the entire immune system in order to start over with new stem cells and immune cells.

As you might know, the immune system of most higher animals is two-layered. The layer that evolved first, and which remains the entirety of the immune system in lower animals such as insects, is known as the innate immune system. It reacts quickly, generates inflammation, and reacts in the same, predictable way to every threat. It has no memory and does not reconfigure its operations in response to circumstances and history. Later in evolutionary history, a second layer known as the adaptive immune system came into being, a more sophisticated set of functions resting on top of the existing innate mechanisms. The innate immune system reacts to intruders, and then the adaptive immune system records the nature of the threat and responds in its own manner, augmenting the attack. As the name suggests, the adaptive immune system maintains a memory and adjusts its operations in order to more aggressively destroy pathogens that it has encountered in the past. As anyone in the field will tell you, however, this high level picture of cleanly divided dualism is overly simplistic, however. There are numerous grey areas and incompletely understood complexities at the border between the two sides of the immune system.

Given that the adaptive immune system can adapt, its failure with aging is in large part a matter of acquired misconfiguration. There is only a small influx of new immune cells in adults, and this puts an effective limit on the number of immune cells that is supported at any one time. The inevitable problem in a space-limited system that keeps a continual record of history is that it runs out of space: evolutionary pressures produced the trade-off of a system that works very well out of the gate in young people, but fails sometime in later life. An old adaptive immune system is burdened with too many cells devoted to memory and too few cells devoted to attacking new threats. That is on top of the progressive failures that occur due to the the growing burden of the molecular damage that accompanies aging: persistent metabolic waste products such as cross-links and lipofuscin, mitochondrial damage, diminished stem cell activity, and so forth. The innate immune system has its own problems that arise from this damage, but is less prone of the issue of misconfiguration.

Understanding exactly how aging progressively harms the intricate choreography of the immune response is a massive project, and nowhere near completion. It is possible to judge how far along researchers are in this work by the side effect of the quality of therapies for autoimmune disease, which are malfunctions in immune configuration, and largely incurable at the present time. From a practical point of view, and as mentioned above, the best prospects for effective treatments in the near future involve destroying and recreating the immune system. That works around our comparative ignorance by removing all of the problems that researchers don't understand in addition to ones that they do. Destroying the immune system can only be done with chemotherapy at the moment, which no-one would undergo unless there was no choice in the matter given that it has significant negative effects on long-term health, but once new methods of selective immune cell destruction are developed, lacking side-effects, then we can start to talk about treating immune aging by rebooting the immune system.

Convergence of Innate and Adaptive Immunity during Human Aging

Aging is associated with a general decline in immune function, contributing to a higher risk of infection, cancer, and autoimmune diseases in the elderly. Such faulty immune responses are the result of a profound remodeling of the immune system that occurs with age, generally termed as immunosenescence. While the number of nave T cells emerging from the thymus progressively decreases with age as a result of thymic involution, the memory T cell pool expands and exhibits significant changes in the phenotype and function of antigen-experienced T cells, particularly evident in the CD8+ T cell compartment. Chronic immune activation due to persistent viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), is one of the main drivers contributing to the accumulation of highly differentiated antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes that have characteristics of replicative senescence. In combination with the depletion of the peripheral pool of nave T cells, the accumulation of these terminally differentiated T cells with age skews the immune repertoire and has been implicated in the impaired immune responses to new antigens and vaccination in the elderly

Natural killer cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes are the two major cell lineages with constitutive cytotoxic activity and have a crucial role in the recognition and killing of abnormal cells. However, the paradigm for the recognition of target cells is fundamentally different between these two cell types: conventional CD8+ T cells rely on the T cell receptor (TCR) to recognize specific peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex class-I (MHC-I) molecules, whereas NK cells use a repertoire of germ line-encoded receptors to detect "missing self" or "altered-self" antigens and directly kill abnormal cells, without prior sensitization. Besides antigen specificity, the development of immunological memory is conventionally another distinctive feature between NK and T cells, categorizing them into distinct arms of the immune system and the innate and adaptive immune system, respectively.

Nevertheless, accumulating evidence supports the existence of NK cell memory, as well as evidence for TCR-independent responses mediated by CD8+ T lymphocytes, suggesting that the conventional limits between the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system may be not as distinct as first thought. NK and T lymphocytes have a common origin from a lymphoid progenitor cell in the bone marrow, and recent comparative proteomic and transcriptomic studies have demonstrated a remarkably close proximity between effector CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells, reiterating an evolutionary ancestry and shared biology between the two cell lineages.

An increasing body of literature reveals the existence of subsets of T cells with features that bridge innate and adaptive immunity. These cells typically co-express a TCR and NK cell lineage markers, distinguishing them from NK cells and other innate lymphoid cells, which lack the expression of a TCR or somatically rearranged receptors. Functionally, innate-like T cells respond to TCR ligation but are also able to respond rapidly to danger signals and pro-inflammatory cytokines, independently of TCR stimulation, resembling innate cells. Recently, subsets of conventional CD8+ T cells expressing NK cell markers and intraepithelial T cells have been included in this vaguely defined group of innate-like T cells. Despite the similarities in phenotype and function, there are clear differences in ontogeny and tissue distribution between them.

In this review, we will discuss recent evidence that aging is associated with the expansion of a subset of conventional CD8+ T cells with phenotypic, functional, and transcriptomic features that resemble NK cells. Such innate-like CD8+ T cells have the characteristics of terminally differentiated T cells, and the acquisition of functional NK receptors is most likely part of a general reprograming of the CD8+ T cell compartment during human aging, to ensure broad and rapid effector functions. We propose that innate-like CD8+ T cells share important features with other innate-like T cells; however, fundamental differences in origin and development separate them from truly innate cells. Interestingly, these cells are also differentially affected by aging, suggesting distinct roles in immune responses at different times of life. Evidence indicates that chronological aging is associated with accumulation of cells combining features of both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system, most likely to compensate for functional defects of conventional NK and CD8+ T cells with age. We propose that senescent CD8+ T cells should not be seen as a dysfunctional population but instead a functionally distinct subset, which uses recently acquired NK cell machinery to maintain rapid effector functions throughout life. Contrary to the classic paradigm that peripheral TCR ligation is essential for T cell activation, this subset of highly differentiated T cells has impaired TCR responsiveness and may be non-specifically activated by inflammatory cytokines or after ligation of innate receptors. The switch to an innate mode of function may shed light on the mechanisms that allow highly differentiated CD8+ T cells to maintain functionality, despite the loss of TCR signal functions.

Our understanding of the physiological significance of the expression of NKRs on T cells is still incomplete, and the identification of the molecular mechanisms and the transcriptional regulators underpinning the development of innate features in T cells is essential. Most importantly, it will be important to understand how the intersection between innate and adaptive immune features may be manipulated to enhance immune function and to use this information to develop new approaches to improve immunity in the elderly.

Loading...

There are many possible answers to the question of why women have a longer life expectancy than men, but no real consensus on which of the candidate mechanisms are the important ones. It is interesting to note that, in an age in which rejuvenation therapies are starting to arrive, the research community has a better idea of how to bring aging under medical control, and thus make natural variations in longevity irrelevant, than of how to definitively determine the mechanisms causing those natural variations between groups of humans. Fully understanding our biochemistry is a massive undertaking, far greater in scope than merely wrestling degenerative aging into submission by addressing its root causes. Biology is enormously complex, and working with statistical demographic data or evolutionary theory doesn't tend to produce firm answers, only helping to narrow down the directions for further inquiry.

People worldwide are living longer, healthier lives. A new study of mortality patterns in humans, monkeys and apes suggests that the last few generations of humans have enjoyed the biggest life expectancy boost in primate history. The gains are partly due to advances in medicine and public health that have increased the odds of survival for human infants and reduced the death toll from childhood illness. Yet males still lag behind females - not just in humans but across the primate family tree, the researchers find. "The male disadvantage has deep evolutionary roots."

An international team compiled records of births and deaths for more than a million people worldwide, from the 18th century to the present. The data included people in post-industrial societies such as Sweden and Japan, people born in pre-industrial times, and modern hunter-gatherers, who provide a baseline for how long people might have lived before supermarkets and modern medicine. The researchers combined these measurements with similar data for six species of wild primates that have been studied continuously for three to five decades, including sifaka lemurs, muriqui monkeys, capuchins, baboons, chimpanzees and gorillas. The data confirm a growing body of research suggesting that humans are making more rapid and dramatic gains than ever before seen in the primate family tree. For example, in the last 200 years life expectancy in Sweden has jumped from the mid-30s to over 80, meaning that a baby born today can hope to live more than twice as long as one born in the early 19th century. The data show that today's longest-lived human populations have a similar 40- to 50-year advantage over people who live traditional lifestyles, such as the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania and the Ach people of Paraguay.

In contrast, these modern hunter-gatherers - the best lens we have into the lives of early humans - live on average just 10 to 20 years longer than wild primates such as muriquis or chimpanzees, from which human ancestors diverged millions of years ago. "We've made a bigger journey in lengthening our lifespan over the last few hundred years than we did over millions of years of evolutionary history." One indicator of healthcare improvement is infant mortality, which strikes fewer than 3 in 1000 babies born in Sweden or Japan today. But it was more than 40 times higher for those born two centuries ago, and is still high among hunter-gatherers and wild primates.

The researchers also studied lifespan equality, a measure similar to income equality that indicates whether longevity is distributed evenly across society, or only enjoyed by a few. They found that, for both humans and wild primates, every gain in average lifespan is accompanied by a gain in lifespan equality. That is, for a population to be very long-lived, everyone must benefit more or less equally, with fewer individuals left behind. The researchers were surprised to find that the longevity of human males has yet to catch up with females, and the improvements in males aren't spread as evenly. A girl born in Sweden in the early 1800s could expect to outlive her male counterparts by an average of three to four years. Two hundred years later, despite Swedes adding 45 years to their average lifespan, the gulf that separates the sexes has barely budged. The life expectancy gender gap isn't just true for humans. Females outlived males in almost every wild primate population they looked at.

Link: https://today.duke.edu/2016/11/life-expectancy-grows-men-still-lagging

Loading...

In the field of tissue engineering, this is the era of organoids. Researchers are limited in the size of tissue they can produce because of the lack of a robust method of generating the blood vessel networks needed to support large tissue sections, but are otherwise making significant progress in the generation of functional organ tissue. Initially this is producing the greatest benefit for further research and development, allowing tests to be conducted in living tissue at a much faster pace and lower cost. For many tissue types, however, organoids also offer the possibility of benefits realized through transplantation, as in many cases they are capable of integrating with existing organ tissue to improve its function.

Scientists report using human pluripotent stem cells to grow human intestinal tissues that have functioning nerves in a laboratory. The paper puts medical science a step closer to using human pluripotent stem cells (which can become any cell type in the body) for regenerative medicine and growing patient-specific human intestine for transplant. "One day this technology will allow us to grow a section of healthy intestine for transplant into a patient, but the ability to use it now to test and ask countless new questions will help human health to the greatest extent." This ability starts with being able to model and study intestinal disorders in functioning, three-dimensional human organ tissue with genetically-specific patient cells. The technology will also allow researchers to test new therapeutics in functioning lab-engineered human intestine before clinical trials in patients.

Researchers started out by subjecting human pluripotent stem cells to a biochemical bath that triggers their formation into human intestinal tissue in a petri dish. The process was essentially the same as that used in a 2010 study, which reported the first-ever generation of three-dimensional human intestinal organoids in a laboratory. Intestinal tissues from the initial study lacked an enteric nervous system, which is critical to the movement of waste through the digestive tract and the absorption of nutrients. The gastrointestinal tract contains the second largest number of nerves in the human body. When these nerves fail to work properly it hinders the contraction of intestinal muscles. To engineer a nervous system for the intestinal organoids already growing in one petri dish, researchers generated embryonic-stage nerve cells called neural crest cells in a separate dish. The neural crest cells were manipulated to form precursor cells for enteric nerves. The challenge at this stage was identifying how and when to incorporate the neural crest cells into the developing intestine. "We tried a few different approaches largely based on the hypothesis that, if you put the right cells together at the right time in the petri dish, they'll know what do to. It was a long shot, but it worked." The appropriate mix caused enteric nerve precursor cells and intestines to grow together in a manner resembling developing fetal intestine.

A key test for the engineered intestines and nerves was transplanting them into a living organism - in this case laboratory mice with suppressed immune systems. This allowed researchers to see how well the tissues grow and function. Study data show the tissues work and are structured in a manner remarkably similar to natural human intestine. They grow robustly, process nutrients and demonstrate peristalsis - series of wave-like muscle contractions that in the body move food through the digestive tract.

Link: https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/news/release/2016/hirschsprungs-intestinal-nerve-disorder

Loading...

The first rejuvenation therapies to work well enough to merit the name will be based on the SENS vision: that aging is at root caused by a few classes of accumulated cell and tissue damage, and biotechnologies that either repair that damage or render it irrelevant will as a result produce rejuvenation. Until very recently, no medical technology could achieve this goal, and few research groups were even aiming for that outcome. We are in the midst of a grand transition, however, in which the research and development community is finally turning its attention to the causes of aging, understanding that this is the only way to effectively treat and cure age-related disease. Age-related diseases are age-related precisely because they are caused by the same processes of damage that cause aging: the only distinctions between aging and disease are the names given to various collections of symptoms. All of frailty, disease, weakness, pain, and suffering in aging is the result of accumulated damage at the level of cells and protein machinery inside those cells. Once the medical community becomes firmly set on the goal of repairing that damage, we'll be well on the way to controlling and managing aging as a chronic condition - preventing it from causing harm to the patient by periodically repairing and removing its causes before they rise to the level of producing symptoms and dysfunction. The therapies of the future will be very different from the therapies of the past.

The full rejuvenation toolkit of the next few decades will consist of a range of different treatments, each targeting a different type of molecular damage in cells and tissues. In this post, I'll take a look at the likely order of arrival of some of these therapies, based on what is presently going on in research, funding, and for-profit development. This is an update to a similar post written four years ago, now become somewhat dated given recent advances in the field. Circumstances change, and considerable progress has been made in some lines of research and development.

1) Clearance of Senescent Cells

It didn't take much of a crystal ball four years ago to put senescent cell clearance in first place, the most likely therapy to arrive first. All of the pieces of the puzzle were largely in place at that time: the demonstration of benefits in mice; potential means of clearance; interested research groups. Only comparatively minor details needed filling in. Four years later no crystal ball is required at all, given that Everon Biosciences, Oisin Biotechnologies, SIWA Therapeutics, and UNITY Biotechnology are all forging ahead with various different approaches to the selective destruction of senescent cells. No doubt many groups within established Big Pharma entities are also taking a stab at this, more quietly, and with less press attention. UNITY Biotechnology has raised more than $100 million to date, demonstrating that there is broad enthusiasm for this approach to the treatment of aging and age-related disease.

With the additional attention and funding for this field, more methods of selective cell destruction have been established, and there is now a greater and more detailed understanding of the ways in which senescent cells cause harm, contributing to the aging process. Senolytic drugs that induce apoptosis have been discovered; senescent cells are primed to enter the programmed cell death process of apoptosis, and so a small nudge to all cells via a drug treatment kills many senescent cells but very few normal cells. Researchers have established that senescent cells exist in the immune system, and may be important in immune aging. Similarly, the immune cells involved in the progression of atherosclerosis are also senescent, and removing them slows the progression of that condition. Other research has shown that removing senescent cells from the lungs restores lost tissue elasticity and improves lung function. Beyond these specific details, senescent cells clearly contribute to chronic inflammation in aging, and that drives the progression of near all common age-related conditions. The less inflammation the better. These effects are caused by the signals secreted by senescent cells: that their harm is based on signaling explains how a small number of these cells, perhaps 1% by number in an aged organ, can cause such widespread havoc.

2) Immune System Destruction and Restoration

At the present time it is a challenge to pick second place. A number of fields are all equally close to realization, and happenstance in funding decisions, regulatory matters, or technical details yet to be uncovered will make the difference. The destruction and recreation of the immune system wins out because it is already possible, already demonstrated to be successful, and just missing one component part that would enable it to be used by ordinary, healthy, older people. At present researchers and clinicians use chemotherapy to destroy immune cells and the stem cells that create them. Repopulation of the immune system is carried out via cell transplants that are by now a safe and proven application of stem cell medicine, little different from the many varieties of first generation stem cell therapy. This approach has been used to cure people with multiple sclerosis, and has been attempted with varying degrees of success for a number of other autoimmune conditions for going on fifteen years now: there are researchers with a lot of experience in this type of therapy.

The catch here is that chemotherapy is a damaging experience. The cost of undergoing it is high, both immediately, and in terms of negative impact on later health and life expectancy, similar to that resulting from a life spent smoking. It only makes sense for people who are otherwise on their way to an early death or disability, as is the case for multiple sclerosis patients. However, there are a number of approaches very close to practical realization that will make chemotherapy obsolete for the selective destruction of immune cells and stem cells - approaches with minimal or no side-effects. A combined approach targeting c-kit and CD47 was demonstrated earlier this year, for example. Sophisticated cell targeting systems such as the gene therapy approach developed for senescent cell clearance by Oisin Biotechnologies could also be turned to stem cell or immune cell destruction, given suitable markers of cell chemistry. There are quite a few of these, any one of which would be good enough.

Replacing the chemotherapy with a safe, side-effect-free treatment would mean that the established programs for immune system restoration could immediately expand to become a useful, effective treatment for immunosenescence, the age-related failure of the immune system. This is in part a problem of configuration: a lifetime of exposure to persistent pathogens such as herpesviruses leaves too much of the immune system uselessly devoted to specific targets that it cannot effectively clear from the body, and too little left ready to fight new threats and destroy malfunctioning cells. Then there are various forms of autoimmunity that become prevalent in older people, not all of which are in any way fully understood - consider just how recently type 4 diabetes was discovered, for example. Clearing out the entire immune system, all of its memory and quirks, and restarting it fresh with a new supply of stem cells is a good approach to many of the issues in the aged immune system. Not all of them, but many of them, and considering the broad influence immune function has over many other aspects of health and tissue function, it seems a worthwhile goal.

3) Clearance of the First Few Types of Amyloid

There are about twenty different types of amyloid, misfolded proteins that form solid deposits. Not all are robustly associated with age-related dysfunction, but of those that are, some progress has been made towards effective therapies based on clearance. Last year, a clinical trial of transthyretin amyloid clearance produced good results. This type of amyloid is associated with heart disease, and is thought to be the primary cause of death in supercentenarians. This year researchers finally demonstrated clearance of amyloid- in humans, after a long series of failures. Amyloid- is one of the forms of metabolic waste that accumulates in Alzheimer's disease.

So these types of rejuvenation therapy already exist in the sense of prototypes and trial treatments. To the degree that they are effective and safe, everyone much over the age of 40 should be undergoing a course of treatment every few years. In practice, since both of the above mentioned therapies are tied up in the slow-moving edifice of Big Pharma regulatory capture, it will be a long time before they make it to the clinic in any way that is accessible to an ordinary individual. The most likely path to that goal is for other groups outside that system to reverse engineer the basic technology from the scientific publications, implement their own methodologies, and market it in other regulatory regions, making it available via medical tourism. This is how stem cell medicine progressed, and seems likely to be the way that any other very significant field will also move forward.

4) Clearance of Glucosepane Cross-Links

Clearance of cross-links in the extracellular matrix of tissues is, like senescent cell destruction, one of the most exciting of early rejuvenation therapies. It is a single target that influences a great many aspects of aging: if we look at just the cross-link-induced loss of elasticity in blood vessels alone, that has a major influence on mortality through hypertension and consequent impact on cardiovascular health. It is also a single target in the sense that near all persistent cross-links important to aging in humans so far appear to be based on one compound, glucosepane. Thus all that is needed is one drug candidate.

Four years ago, the situation for glucosepane clearance looked pretty bleak. The funding was minimal, and the tools for working with glucosepane in living tissues didn't exist. Researchers avoided the whole topic, as making any progress would require a lot of funding and effort to even get to the point of starting in earnest. The SENS Research Foundation and their allies have since made major inroads into this challenge, however. Last year, a method of cheaply and reliably synthesizing glucosepane was established, and now the road is open to anyone who wants to try their hand at drug discovery. That is now underway in the Spiegel Lab, among others, and I'd hope to see the first potential drug candidates emerge at some point in the next couple of years.

5) Thymic Rejuvenation to Increase the Supply of Immune Cells

Another possible approach to partially restore lost function in the aging immune system is to increase the pace at which new immune cells are created. This is a very slow pace indeed in older people, due in large part to the age-related decline of the thymus. The thymus acts as a nursery for the maturation of T cells, and its atrophy thus restricts the rate at which new cells enter circulation. There has been some progress towards engineering of replacement active thymus tissue, as well as methods of providing signal proteins that instruct the old thymus to regenerate and begin to act in a more youthful manner. Transplants of young thymus organs into old mice has demonstrated that this class of approach can produce a meaningful improvement in immune function, and thereby extend healthy life. This is one of a number of regenerative approaches that is on the verge, just waiting for someone to start a company or join the final two dots together and get moving.

6) Mitochondrial Repair

Mitochondria, the power plants of the cell, are herds of bacteria-like organelles that bear their own DNA. This DNA becomes damaged in the course of normal cellular processes, and certain forms of mitochondrial DNA damage - to the thirteen genes needed for oxidative phosphorylation - produce malfunctioning mitochondria that can overtake their cells, either by replicating more readily or being more resistant to quality control mechanisms. Such cells become dysfunctional exporters of harmful signals and oxidized proteins, something that contributes to the progression of atherosclerosis via increased amounts of oxidized lipids in the bloodstream, to pick one example. If we're lucky, a substantial proportion of these cells will become senescent as a result of their mutant mitochondria, and will thus be destroyed by senescent cell clearance therapies. Regardless of whether or not that is true, a method of either repairing or working around this type of damage is needed.

Most of the possible approaches may or may not work well, because of the replication advantage that damaged mitochondria have over normal mitochondria, and are still to be tested in practice rather than theory or demonstration: upregulation of existing repair mechanisms; delivery of extra functional mitochondrial DNA or whole mitochondria; and so forth. The SENS approach is somewhat more radical, involving gene therapy to introduce copies of the thirteen genes into the cell nucleus, altered to ensure that the proteins produced can migrate back to the mitochondria where they are needed. Mitochondria will thus have the necessary protein machinery for correct function regardless of the state of their DNA. This has been demonstrated for three of the thirteen genes of interest, numbers two and three just this year, and getting that far has taken the better part of ten years at a low level of funding. It is likely that things will go faster in the future, now that there is a for-profit company, Gensight Biologics working on the problem in addition to non-profit groups, but it is still the case that the bulk of the work remains to be done.

Will it be useful to have therapies that fix half the problem, moving six or seven genes to the cell nucleus? Will that reduce the impact on aging by half? Hard to say until it is done and demonstrated in mice. Halfway there is probably a target reached by 2020 or so at the present pace. Mitochondrial function appears from all the evidence to be an important aspect of aging, so it is to my eyes worth trying at the halfway point to see what the outcome is.

7) A Robust Cure for Cancer

Some might find it counterintuitive that a universal cure for cancer is not last in this list. We've all been educated to think of cancer as the greatest challenge for medical science, the problem to be solved last of all. Nonetheless, a more rapid arrival of a generally applicable cure for cancer looks to be the likely course of events, as the basis for a treatment that can in principle put a halt to all cancer at all stages of development is currently in the earliest stages of development. All cancers depend absolutely on the ability to continually lengthen telomeres, and so avoid the Hayflick limit on cell replication. Telomere lengthening occurs through the activity of telomerase or the less well understood alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanisms: these two are a small set of targets for modern medicine, and researchers are working on the challenge. If telomerase and ALT can both be blocked, temporarily and either globally throughout the body or selectively in cancerous tissue, then cancer will wither and become controllable. This is too fundamental a part of cellular biochemistry for the rapid mutational evolution of cancer cells to work around, as they can for many of the standard approaches to cancer treatment at the present time. Stem cell populations will suffer while telomerase activity is blocked, as they require telomere lengthening for self-renewal, but that is a lesser problem when compared to cancer and one that the stem cell research community will become increasingly able to address in the years ahead.

8) Reversing Stem Cell Aging

The stem cell industry is massively funded, and is on a collision course with stem cell aging. Most of the conditions that one would want to use stem cell therapies to treat are age-related conditions. Researchers must thus ensure that the altered cellular environment, the damage of aging, doesn't prevent the treatments from working - that pristine cells can integrate and work well, not immediately die or decline in response to an age-damaged stem cell niche. On the whole, the research community isn't engaging aggressively with this goal, however. Possible reasons for this include the fact that most stem cell treatments, even without addressing issues of the aged tissue environment, represent a considerable improvement in the scope of what is possible to achieve through modern medicine. So the incentive to go further is perhaps not as strong as it might otherwise be.

Stem cell populations become damaged by age, falling into quiescence or declining in overall numbers. They should be replaced with new populations, but while simple in concept, and even achieved for some cell types, such as the blood stem cells that produce immune cells, this is easier said than done for the body as a whole. Every tissue type is its own special case. There are hundreds of types of cell in the body. Each supporting stem cell population has so far required specific methodologies to be developed, and specific behaviors and biochemistry to be laboriously mapped. It isn't even entirely clear that researchers have found all of the stem cell or stem-like cell populations of interest. There is an enormous amount of work to be done here, and at the moment the field is still largely in the phase of getting the basics, the maps, and the reliable therapeutic methods sorted out for a few of the better understood tissue types, bone marrow and muscles in particular. So this seems at the present time like a long-term prospect, despite the high levels of funding for this line of medical research and development.

9) Clearance of Other Amyloids, Aggregates, and Sundry Lysosomal Garbage

A good portion of aging is driven by the accumulation of waste products, either because they are hard for our biochemistry to break down, is the case for glucosepane cross-links and many of the components of lipofuscin that degrade lysosomal function in long-lived cells, or because clearance systems fail over time, as appears likely to be the case for the amyloid- involved in Alzheimer's disease. There are a lot of these compounds: a score of amyloids, any number of lipofuscin constituents, the altered tau that shows up in tauopathies, and so on and so forth. In many cases there isn't even a good defensible link between a specific waste compound and specific age-related diseases: the waste is one contribution buried in many contributions, and the research community won't start putting numbers to relative importance until it is possible to clear out these contributions one by one and observe the results.

A range of research groups are picking away at individual forms of waste, some with large amounts of funding, some with very little funding, but this is a similar situation to that I outlined above for stem cell aging. There is a huge amount of work to accomplish because there are many targets to address, and with few exceptions, such as amyloid-, it is unclear which of the targets are the most important. They will all have to be addressed, in some order, but there are only so many researchers and only so much funding. We can hope that as the first effective therapies make it into the clinic, most likely for the clearance of forms of amyloid, there will be a growing enthusiasm for work on ways to remove other types of metabolic waste.

Loading...

The big question in the study of the comparative biology of regeneration is the degree to which mammals retain the mechanisms needed for the exceptional regeneration found in species such as zebrafish and salamanders. The individuals of these highly regenerative species are capable of regrowing fins, limbs, and major portions of internal organs. Has evolution removed this machinery from mammals, or only buried it, leaving it dormant and awaiting activation? This experiment, in which the molecular signals provided via transplanted extracellular matrix material from zebrafish are shown to enhance heart regeneration in mice, argues for the latter theory. The heart in mammals is among the least regenerative of tissues, and does not recover well from damage, but there is considerable room for improvement in the healing processes for all mammalian tissues. Zebrafish and other highly regenerative species heal without scars and without loss of function, something that cannot be said for mammals.

Many lower forms of life on earth exhibit an extraordinary ability to regenerate tissue, limbs, and even organs - a skill that is lost among humans and other mammals. Now, researchers have used the components of the cellular "scaffolding" of a zebrafish to regenerate heart tissues in mammals, specifically mice, as well as exhibiting promising results in human heart cells in vitro. The researchers found that a single administration of extracellular matrix (ECM) material from zebrafish hearts restored the function of the heart and regenerated adult mouse heart tissues after acute myocardial infarction. The study also found that the zebrafish ECM protected human cardiac myocytes - specialized cells that form heart muscle - from stresses.

ECM are the architectural foundations of tissues and organs; not only do they provide a "scaffolding" on which cells can grow and migrate, they assist in the signaling necessary for the organ to develop, grow, or regenerate. In mammals, the heart quickly loses the ability to regenerate after the organism is born, except for a brief period after birth. In lower animals, such as zebrafish, the heart retains that ability throughout their lives: up to 20 percent of a zebrafish's heart can be damaged or removed, and within days the heart's capacity has been fully restored. The researchers first separated the ECM from the cells so that the recipient heart would not reject the treatment. They did this by freezing the zebrafish cardiac tissue, causing the cell membranes to burst and allowing the researchers to retrieve the ECM, a process called decellularization. They then injected the ECM into the hearts of mice with damaged heart muscles and watched the hearts repair themselves. It is difficult to inject foreign cells into a body because the body will recognize them as foreign and reject them. That's not the case with ECM because it is composed of collagen, elastin, carbohydrates and signaling molecules and has no cell surface markers, DNA or RNA from the donor, and so the recipient is less likely to reject the treatment.

Restored function starts almost immediately, and healing is noticeable as early as five days after treatment; within a week, his team could see the heart beating more strongly than the hearts of the untreated animals. The researchers tested the effectiveness of ECM from normal zebrafish and from zebrafish with damaged hearts, in which the ECM had already begun the healing process. They found that while both types of ECM were effective in repairing damage to the mice hearts, the ECM obtained from the zebrafish hearts that were healing were even more potent in restoring heart function in the mice. The researchers are now working on a process to regenerate nerves in mammals using the same process and hope to expand the heart treatments to larger animals in a future study.

Link: http://www.news.pitt.edu/news/how-do-you-mend-broken-heart

Loading...

Heterochronic parabiosis involves joining the circulatory systems of an old and a young mouse. This produces harmful effects on the young mouse and beneficial effects on the old mouse. There is considerable interest in the research community in identifying the molecular signals involved. So far theory has focused on delivery of beneficial signals from young blood to the old individual, but here researchers present evidence to suggest it may be more a matter of diluting detrimental signals present in the old blood. This has implications for efforts to build therapies based on transfusions of young blood: if dilution is the primary mechanism, those efforts will have little to no effect.

A new study found that tissue health and repair dramatically decline in young mice when half of their blood is replaced with blood from old mice. The study argues against the rejuvenating properties of young blood and points to old blood, or molecules within, as driving the aging process. "Our study suggests that young blood by itself will not work as effective medicine. It's more accurate to say that there are inhibitors in old blood that we need to target to reverse aging." In 2005, researchers found evidence for tissue rejuvenation in older mice when they are surgically joined to younger mice so that blood is exchanged between the two. Despite remaining questions about the mechanism underlying this rejuvenation, media coverage of the study fixated on the potential of young blood to reverse the aging process, and on comparisons to vampires, which was not the takeaway from the study. In the years since the 2005 study, scientists have spent millions to investigate the potential medical properties of youthful blood with enterprises emerging to infuse old people with young blood. "What we showed in 2005 was evidence that aging is reversible and is not set in stone. Under no circumstances were we saying that infusions of young blood into elderly is medicine."

While the experimental model used in the 2005 study found evidence that some aspects of aging may be reversed, the techniques used in the study do not allow scientists to precisely control the exchange of blood, which is necessary to dig deeper into blood's effect on aging. When two mice are sutured together, a technique called parabiosis, blood is not the only thing that is exchanged in this setup; organs are also shared, so old mice get access to younger lungs, thymus-immune system, heart, liver and kidneys. In surgical suturing it takes weeks to a month for the effects of blood to take place and the precise timing is not actually known. Nor is the precise amount of the exchanged blood. In the new study, researchers developed an experimental technique to exchange blood between mice without joining them so that scientists can control blood circulation and conduct precise measurements on how old mice respond to young blood, and vice versa. In the new system, mice are connected and disconnected at will, removing the influence of shared organs or of any adaptation to being joined. One of the more surprising discoveries of this study was the very quick onset of the effects of blood on the health and repair of multiple tissues, including muscle, liver and brain. The effects were seen around 24 hours after exchange.

With the new experimental setup, the research team repeated the experiments from 2005. In each test, blood was exchanged between an old mouse and a young mouse until each mouse had half its blood from the other. The researchers then tested various indicators of aging in each mouse, such as liver cell growth as well as liver fibrosis and adiposity (fat), brain cell development in the region that is needed for learning and memory, muscle strength and muscle tissue repair. In many of these experiments, older mice that received younger blood saw either slight or no significant improvements compared to old mice with old blood. Young mice that received older blood, however, saw large declines in most of these tissues or organs. The most telling data was found when researchers tested blood's impact on new neuron production in the area of the brain where memory and learning are formed. In these experiments, older mice showed no significant improvement in brain neuron stem cells after receiving younger blood, but younger mice that received older blood saw a more than twofold drop in brain cell development compared to normal young mice. The researchers think that many benefits seen in old mice after receiving young blood might be due to the young blood diluting the concentration of inhibitors in the old blood.

Link: http://news.berkeley.edu/2016/11/22/young-blood-does-not-reverse-aging-in-old-mice-uc-berkeley-study-finds/

Loading...

Cryonics is the low-temperature preservation of at least the brain following death, leaving open the possibility of restoration to life in a future in which molecular nanotechnology and total control of cellular biochemistry are mature industries. As individuals, each of us is the data of the mind, no more, no less, and that data is stored in the form of fine physical structures, most likely those of the synapses connecting neurons. If that structure is preserved sufficiently well, then the individual is not yet gone - only ceased for the moment. Early cryopreservations involved straight freezing to liquid nitrogen temperatures, and this likely caused great damage to the structures of the brain due to ice crystal formation. Modern cryopreservations use cryoprotectants and staged cooling to achieve vitrification of tissues with minimal ice crystal formation. There the degree of damage is much reduced, contingent on sufficient perfusion of cryoprotectant and the quality of the other aspects of the process. These technologies are also under development by groups in the organ transplantation and tissue engineering communities: reversible vitrification of organs would solve a great many logistical problems. From the present state of the science, that goal isn't very far distant. Proof of concept vitrification, thawing, and transplantation of mammalian organs has taken place in the laboratory. Even without present reversibility, however, the merits of cryonics stand: people who are preserved are not dead and gone, just dead, with a chance to return. A chance of unknown size, yes, but that is a big improvement over the grave and certain oblivion.

Cryonics suffers from being a small industry. People encountering the concept for the first time tend look at it askance because it is a small community and thus not the usual end of life choice. Then they make up reasons in their own minds as to why it won't work, or is stupid, or illogical, or otherwise wrong, simply because it is not the norm. It takes multiple exposures to a topic for most people to come around and actually engage with what is known rather than with their own knee-jerk reaction to the topic. In the normal run of things, however, few people actually encounter the ideas of cryonics; it doesn't get all that much press, and since it is such a small industry and surrounding community, few people encounter those involved as they make their way through life. Thus public awareness and understanding of the long-standing cryonics industry seems to advance by a series of infrequent great leaps rather than ongoing incremental gains, each such leap driven by the high-profile cryopreservation of a sympathetic or noted individual that attracts a short-lived mob of press attention. First there is a flood of commentary from those who know next to nothing of cryonics and are quick to condemn it for being different, then a following wave of more thoughtful commentary, for and against, and finally some few of the many people who read the coverage choose to dig further, peruse some of the mountain of literature written on cryonics over the past 40 years, and conclude that cryonics does make sense and is a good idea. So the community of supporters and those signed up as members of a cryonics organization grows a little.

The latest leap forward was spurred by the cryopreservation of a terminally ill young lady in the UK, unusual for its surrounding legal case regarding consent and self-determination. The UK has a cryonics support organization, as is the case for many countries, but like most parts of the world lacks a cryonics provider. This may be why so much of the initial commentary has been from those fairly new to the idea, and has been unusually hostile in tone when compared to the media attention of the past five years or so. Being the UK, there is also a considerable focus on regulation, since the bias over there, in the media at least, is very much towards the idea that nothing must ever happen without government involvement - all that is not explicitly allowed is forbidden, any new endeavor must be quickly regulated by a new government office, and so forth. Sadly the US has been heading in that direction quite energetically since the turn of the century; it has been a sad thing to watch taking place. Cultural differences aside, many cryopreservations are carried out under difficult circumstances, and this was one of them. The ideal preservation takes place at the cryonics provider location, or very close by, within a known window of time, and cooldown is rapid following death so as to minimize damage. Departures from that ideal have a cost, both monetary and in the quality of the preservation, but the people involved here by all accounts did the best possible under the circumstances, hampered by the existing regulatory environment that prevents near every possible approach that could make things easier, cheaper, and more reliable.

Below find a very small selection of the recent attention given to this case. There is a lot more out there, if you are interested enough to go looking, ranging from ignorant and hostile to thoughtful and considered. The incorrect term "cryogenics" is bandied around, as is the mistaken idea that cryopreservation involves freezing: the press is ever haphazard when it comes to accuracy, and it doesn't become much better if you glance at what the wisdom of the crowds produced at social news sites in this case. Ultimately this matter, just as any cryopreservation, boils down to issues of self-determination and responsibility for the self. Sadly this is a topic that many members of our society, and especially those in the media and positions of power, seem to find offensive and undesirable: the idea that people can make decisions for themselves, and that those decisions should be respected. But we live in a world in which there is no choice so personal that it will not be interfered with by regulators and lawmakers, and that seems true whether or not the individual is young enough to be considered by those with power effectively the property of his or her parents. (Which is an entirely different iniquity in and of itself). As adults with a lifetime of experience people have just as much trouble in matters of self-determination at the end of life. Witness the political and legal battles over euthanasia, for example, in which childhood is extended indefinitely and the uncaring minions of the state take on the role of distant and forbidding parents. How free are we, really, when it is declared illegal to decide on matters of our own bodies and our own lives, and those who help will be jailed for the crime of compassionate if they are found out?

14-year-old girl who died of cancer wins right to be cryogenically frozen

A 14-year-old girl who said before dying of cancer that she wanted a chance to live longer has been allowed by the high court to have her body cryogenically frozen in the hope that she can be brought back to life at a later time. The court ruled that the teenager's mother, who supported the girl's wish to be cryogenically preserved, should be the only person allowed to make decisions about the disposal of her body. Her estranged father had initially opposed her wishes. During the last months of her life, the teenager, who had a rare form of cancer, used the internet to investigate cryonics. She sent a letter to the court: "I have been asked to explain why I want this unusual thing done. I'm only 14 years old and I don't want to die, but I know I am going to. I think being cryo-preserved gives me a chance to be cured and woken up, even in hundreds of years' time. I don't want to be buried underground. I want to live and live longer and I think that in the future they might find a cure for my cancer and wake me up. I want to have this chance. This is my wish."

The judge wrote: "I was moved by the valiant way in which she was facing her predicament. The scientific theory underlying cryonics is speculative and controversial, and there is considerable debate about its ethical implications. On the other hand, cryopreservation, the preservation of cells and tissues by freezing, is now a well-known process in certain branches of medicine, for example the preservation of sperm and embryos as part of fertility treatment. Cryonics is cryopreservation taken to its extreme." The judge said the girl's family was not well off but that her mother's parents had raised the money. A voluntary UK group of cryonics enthusiasts, who were not medically trained, had offered to help make arrangements. Co-operation of a hospital was required. The hospital trust in the case was willing to help although it stressed it was not endorsing cryonics. "On the contrary, all the professionals feel deep unease about it," the judge said.

The Human Tissue Authority (HTA), which regulates organisations which remove, store and use human tissue, had been consulted but said it had no remit to intervene in such a case. "The HTA would be likely to make representations that activities of the present kind should be brought within the regulatory framework if they showed signs of increasing," the judge said. The HTA said: "We are gathering information about cryopreservation to determine how widespread it is currently, or could become in the future, and any risks it may pose to the individual, or public confidence more broadly. We are in discussion with key stakeholders on the possible need for regulatory oversight." The government may need to intervene in future, the judge said: "It may be that events in this case suggest the need for proper regulation of cryonic preservation in this country if it is to happen in future."

Cryonics debate: 'Many scientists are afraid to hurt their careers'

Read the rest here:
Fight Aging! Reports from the front line in the fight ...

Read More...

Aging of wine – Wikipedia

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2016

The aging of wine is potentially able to improve the quality of wine. This distinguishes wine from most other consumable goods. While wine is perishable and capable of deteriorating, complex chemical reactions involving a wine's sugars, acids and phenolic compounds (such as tannins) can alter the aroma, color, mouthfeel and taste of the wine in a way that may be more pleasing to the taster. The ability of a wine to age is influenced by many factors including grape variety, vintage, viticultural practices, wine region and winemaking style. The condition that the wine is kept in after bottling can also influence how well a wine ages and may require significant time and financial investment.[1][2] The quality of an aged wine varies significantly bottle-by-bottle, depending on the conditions under which it was stored, and the condition of the bottle and cork, and thus it is said that rather than good old vintages, there are good old bottles. There is a significant mystique around the aging of wine, as its chemistry was not understood for a long time, and old wines are often sold for extraordinary prices. However, the vast majority of wine is not aged, and even wine that is aged is rarely aged for long; it is estimated that 90% of wine is meant to be consumed within a year of production, and 99% of wine within 5 years.[3]

The Ancient Greeks and Romans were aware of the potential of aged wines. In Greece, early examples of dried "straw wines" were noted for their ability to age due to their high sugar contents. These wines were stored in sealed earthenware amphorae and kept for many years. In Rome, the most sought after winesFalernian and Surrentinewere prized for their ability to age for decades. In the Book of Luke, it is noted that "old wine" was valued over "new wine" (Luke 5:39). The Greek physician Galen wrote that the "taste" of aged wine was desirable and that this could be accomplished by heating or smoking the wine, though, in Galen's opinion, these artificially aged wines were not as healthy to consume as naturally aged wines.[4]

Following the Fall of the Roman Empire, appreciation for aged wine was virtually non-existent. Most of the wines produced in northern Europe were light bodied, pale in color and with low alcohol. These wines did not have much aging potential and barely lasted a few months before they rapidly deteriorated into vinegar. The older a wine got the cheaper its price became as merchants eagerly sought to rid themselves of aging wine. By the 16th century, sweeter and more alcoholic wines (like Malmsey and Sack) were being made in the Mediterranean and gaining attention for their aging ability. Similarly, Riesling from Germany with its combination of acidity and sugar were also demonstrating their ability to age. In the 17th century, two innovations occurred that radically changed the wine industry's view on aging. One was the development of the cork and bottle which allowed producers to package and store wine in a virtually air-tight environment. The second was the growing popularity of fortifying wines such as Port, Madeira and Sherries. The added alcohol was found to act as a preservative, allowing wines to survive long sea voyages to England, The Americas and the East Indies. The English, in particular, were growing in their appreciation of aged wines like Port and Claret from Bordeaux. Demand for matured wines had a pronounced effect on the wine trade. For producers, the cost and space of storing barrels or bottles of wine was prohibitive so a merchant class evolved with warehouses and the finances to facilitate aging wines for a longer period of time. In regions like Bordeaux, Oporto and Burgundy, this situation dramatically increased the balance of power towards the merchant classes.[4]

There is a widespread misconception that wine always improves with age,[3] or that wine improves with extended aging, or that aging potential is an indicator of good wine. Some authorities state that more wine is consumed too old than too young.[5] Aging changes wine, but does not categorically improve it or worsen it. Fruitness deteriorates rapidly, decreasing markedly after only 6 months in the bottle.[5] Due to the cost of storage, it is not economical to age cheap wines, but many varieties of wine do not benefit from aging, regardless of the quality. Experts vary on precise numbers, but typically state that only 510% of wine improves after 1 year, and only 1% improves after 510 years.[3][5]

In general, wines with a low pH (such as Pinot Noir and Sangiovese) have a greater capability of aging. With red wines, a high level of flavor compounds, such as phenolics (most notably tannins), will increase the likelihood that a wine will be able to age. Wines with high levels of phenols include Cabernet Sauvignon, Nebbiolo and Syrah.[4] The white wines with the longest aging potential tend to be those with a high amount of extract and acidity. The acidity in white wines, acting as a preservative, has a role similar to that of tannins in red wines. The process of making white wines, which includes little to no skin contact, means that white wines have a significantly lower amount of phenolic compounds, though barrel fermentation and oak aging can impart some phenols. Similarly, the minimal skin contact with ros wine limits their aging potential.[1][2][5]

After aging at the winery most wood-aged Ports, Sherries, Vins doux naturels, Vins de liqueur, basic level Ice wines and sparkling wines are bottled when the producer feels that they are ready to be consumed. These wines are ready to drink upon release and will not benefit much from aging. Vintage Ports and other bottled-aged Ports & Sherries will benefit from some additional aging.[4]

Champagne and other sparkling wines are infrequently aged, and frequently have no vintage year (no vintage, NV), but vintage champagne may be aged.[4] Aged champagne has traditionally been a peculiarly British affectation, and thus has been referred to as le got anglais "the English taste",[6] though this term also refers to a level of champagne sweetness. In principle champagne has aging potential, due to the acidity, and aged champagne has increased in popularity in the United States since the 1996 vintage.[7] A few French winemakers have advocated aging champagne, most notably Ren Collard (19212009).[8] In 2009, a 184-year-old bottle of Perrier-Jout was opened and tasted, still drinkable, with notes of "truffles and caramel", according to the experts.[9]

A guideline provided by Master of Wine Jancis Robinson[5]

A guideline provided by Master of Wine Jancis Robinson. Note that vintage, wine region and winemaking style can influence a wine's aging potential so Robinson's suggestion of years are very rough estimates of the most common examples of these wines.[5]

The ratio of sugars, acids and phenolics to water is a key determination of how well a wine can age. The less water in the grapes prior to harvest, the more likely the resulting wine will have some aging potential. Grape variety, climate, vintage and viticultural practice come into play here. Grape varieties with thicker skins, from a dry growing season where little irrigation was used and yields were kept low will have less water and a higher ratio of sugar, acids and phenolics. The process of making Eisweins, where water is removed from the grape during pressing as frozen ice crystals, has a similar effect of decreasing the amount of water and increasing aging potential.[2][5]

In winemaking, the duration of maceration or skin contact will influence how much phenolic compounds are leached from skins into the wine. Pigmented tannins, anthocyanins, colloids, tannin-polysaccharides and tannin-proteins not only influence a wine's resulting color but also act as preservatives. During fermentation adjustment to a wine's acid levels can be made with wines with lower pH having more aging potential. Exposure to oak either during fermentation or after (during barrel aging) will introduce more phenolic compounds to the wines. Prior to bottling, excessive fining or filtering of the wine could strip the wine of some phenolic solids and may lessen a wine's ability to age.[1][4]

The storage condition of the bottled wine will influence a wine's aging. Vibrations and heat fluctuations can hasten a wine's deterioration and cause adverse effect on the wines. In general, a wine has a greater potential to develop complexity and more aromatic bouquet if it is allowed to age slowly in a relatively cool environment. The lower the temperature, the more slowly a wine develops.[4] On average, the rate of chemical reactions in wine double with each 18F (8C) increase in temperature. Wine expert Karen MacNeil, recommends keeping wine intended for aging in a cool area with a constant temperature around 55F (13C). Wine can be stored at temperatures as high as 69F (20C) without long term negative effect. Professor Cornelius Ough of the University of California, Davis believes that wine could be exposed to temperatures as high as 120F (49C) for a few hours and not be damaged. However, most experts believe that extreme temperature fluctuations (such as repeated transferring a wine from a warm room to a cool refrigerator) would be detrimental to the wine. The ultra-violet rays of direct sunlight should also be avoided because of the free radicals that can develop in the wine and result in premature oxidation.[2][12]

Wines packaged in large format bottles, such as magnums and 3 liter Jeroboams, seem to age more slowly than wines packaged in regular 750 ml bottles or half bottles. This may be because of the greater proportion of oxygen exposed to the wine during the bottle process. The advent of alternative wine closures to cork, such as screw caps and synthetic corks have opened up recent discussions on the aging potential of wines sealed with these alternative closures. Currently there are no conclusive results and the topic is the subject of ongoing research.[1][4]

One of the short-term aging needs of wine is a period where the wine is considered "sick" due to the trauma and volatility of the bottling experience. During bottling the wine is exposed to some oxygen which causes a domino effect of chemical reactions with various components of the wine. The time it takes for the wine to settle down and have the oxygen fully dissolve and integrate with the wine is considered its period of "bottle shock". During this time the wine could taste drastically different from how it did prior to bottling or how it will taste after the wine has settled. While many modern bottling lines try to treat the wine as gently as possible and utilize inert gases to minimize the amount of oxygen exposure, all wine goes through some period of bottle shock. The length of this period will vary with each individual wine.[2][5]

The transfer of off-flavours in the cork used to bottle a wine during prolonged aging can be detrimental to the quality of the bottle. The formation of cork taint is a complex process which may result from a wide range of factors ranging from the growing conditions of the cork oak, the processing of the cork into stoppers, or the molds growing on the cork itself.[1][2]

During the course of aging, a wine may slip into a "dumb phase" where its aromas and flavors are very muted. In Bordeaux this phase is called the age ingrat or "difficult age" and is likened to a teenager going through adolescence. The cause or length of time that this "dumb phase" will last is not yet fully understood and seems to vary from bottle to bottle.[12]

As red wine ages, the harsh tannins of its youth gradually give way to a softer mouthfeel. An inky dark color will eventually lose its depth of color and begin to appear orange at the edges, and then later eventually turning brown. These changes occur due to the complex chemical reactions of the phenolic compounds of the wine. In processes that begin during fermentation and continue after bottling, these compounds bind together and aggregate. Eventually these particles reach a certain size where they are too large to stay suspended in the solution and precipitate out. The presence of visible sediment in a bottle will usually indicate a mature wine. The resulting wine, with this loss of tannins and pigment, will have a paler color and taste softer, less astringent. The sediment, while harmless, can have an unpleasant taste and is often separated from the wine by decanting.[5]

During the aging process, the perception of a wine's acidity may change even though the total measurable amount of acidity is more or less constant throughout a wine's life. This is due to the esterification of the acids, combining with alcohols in complex array to form esters. In addition to making a wine taste less acidic, these esters introduce a range of possible aromas. Eventually the wine may age to a point where other components of the wine (such as a tannins and fruit) are less noticeable themselves, which will then bring back a heightened perception of wine acidity. Other chemical processes that occur during aging include the hydrolysis of flavor precursors which detach themselves from glucose molecules and introduce new flavor notes in the older wine and aldehydes become oxidized. The interaction of certain phenolics develop what is known as tertiary aromas which are different from the primary aromas that are derived from the grape and during fermentation.[2][4]

As a wine starts to mature, its bouquet will become more developed and multi-layered. While a taster may be able to pick out a few fruit notes in a young wine, a more complex wine will have several distinct fruit, floral, earthy, mineral and oak derived notes. The lingering finish of a wine will lengthen. Eventually the wine will reach a point of maturity, when it is said to be at its "peak". This is the point when the wine has the maximum amount of complexity, most pleasing mouthfeel and softening of tannins and has not yet started to decay. When this point will occur is not yet predictable and can vary from bottle to bottle. If a wine is aged for too long, it will start to descend into decrepitude where the fruit tastes hollow and weak while the wine's acidity becomes dominant.[4]

The natural esterification that takes place in wines and other alcoholic beverages during the aging process is an example of acid-catalysed esterification. Over time, the acidity of the acetic acid and tannins in an aging wine will catalytically protonate other organic acids (including acetic acid itself), encouraging ethanol to react as a nucleophile. As a result, ethyl acetate the ester of ethanol and acetic acidis the most abundant ester in wines. Other combinations of organic alcohols (such as phenol-containing compounds) and organic acids lead to a variety of different esters in wines, contributing to their different flavours, smells and tastes. Of course, when compared to sulfuric acid conditions, the acid conditions in a wine are mild, so yield is low (often in tenths or hundredths of a percentage point by volume) and take years for ester to accumulate.[1]

Coates Law of Maturity is a principle used in wine tasting relating to the aging ability of wine. Developed by the British Master of Wine, Clive Coates, the principle states that a wine will remain at its peak (or optimal) drinking quality for a duration of time that is equal to the time of maturation required to reach its optimal quality. During the evolution (aging) of a wine certain flavors, aromas and textures appear and fade. Rather than developing and fading in unison, these traits each operate on a unique evolutionary path and time line. The principle allows for the subjectivity of individual tastes because it follows the logic that positive traits that appeal to one particular wine taster will continue to persist along the principle's guideline while for another taster these traits might not be positive and therefore not applicable to the guideline. Wine expert Tom Stevenson has noted that there is logic in Coates' principle and that he has yet to encounter an anomaly or wine that debunks it.[13]

An example of the principle in practice would be a wine that someone acquires when it is 9 years of age, but finds it dull. A year later the drinker finds this wine very pleasing in texture, aroma and mouthfeel. Under the Coates Law of Maturity the wine will continue to be drunk at an optimal maturation for that drinker until it has reached 20 years of age at which time those positive traits that the drinker perceives will start to fade.[13]

There is a long history of using artificial means to try to accelerate the natural aging process. In Ancient Rome a smoke chamber known as a fumarium was used to enhance the flavor of wine through artificial aging. Amphorae were placed in the chamber, which was built on top of a heated hearth, in order to impart a smoky flavor in the wine that also seemed to sharpen the acidity. The wine would sometimes come out of the fumarium with a paler color just like aged wine.[14] Modern winemaking techniques like micro-oxygenation can have the side effect of artificially aging the wine. In the production of Madeira and rancio wines, the wines are deliberately exposed to excessive temperatures to accelerate the maturation of the wine. Other techniques used to artificially age wine (with inconclusive results on their effectiveness) include shaking the wine, exposing it to radiation, magnetism or ultra-sonic waves.[4] More recently, experiments with artificial aging through high-voltage electricity have produced results above the remaining techniques, as assessed by a panel of wine tasters.[15] Other artificial wine-aging gadgets include the "Clef du Vin", which is a metallic object that is dipped into wine and purportedly ages the wine one year for every second of dipping. The product has received mixed reviews from wine commentators.[16]

The rest is here:
Aging of wine - Wikipedia

Read More...

Why I Hope to Die at 75 – The Atlantic

Saturday, November 12th, 2016

Seventy-five.

Thats how long I want to live: 75 years.

This preference drives my daughters crazy. It drives my brothers crazy. My loving friends think I am crazy. They think that I cant mean what I say; that I havent thought clearly about this, because there is so much in the world to see and do. To convince me of my errors, they enumerate the myriad people I know who are over 75 and doing quite well. They are certain that as I get closer to 75, I will push the desired age back to 80, then 85, maybe even 90.

I am sure of my position. Doubtless, death is a loss. It deprives us of experiences and milestones, of time spent with our spouse and children. In short, it deprives us of all the things we value.

But here is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived. It robs us of our creativity and ability to contribute to work, society, the world. It transforms how people experience us, relate to us, and, most important, remember us. We are no longer remembered as vibrant and engaged but as feeble, ineffectual, even pathetic.

By the time I reach 75, I will have lived a complete life. I will have loved and been loved. My children will be grown and in the midst of their own rich lives. I will have seen my grandchildren born and beginning their lives. I will have pursued my lifes projects and made whatever contributions, important or not, I am going to make. And hopefully, I will not have too many mental and physical limitations. Dying at 75 will not be a tragedy. Indeed, I plan to have my memorial service before I die. And I dont want any crying or wailing, but a warm gathering filled with fun reminiscences, stories of my awkwardness, and celebrations of a good life. After I die, my survivors can have their own memorial service if they wantthat is not my business.

Let me be clear about my wish. Im neither asking for more time than is likely nor foreshortening my life. Today I am, as far as my physician and I know, very healthy, with no chronic illness. I just climbed Kilimanjaro with two of my nephews. So I am not talking about bargaining with God to live to 75 because I have a terminal illness. Nor am I talking about waking up one morning 18 years from now and ending my life through euthanasia or suicide. Since the 1990s, I have actively opposed legalizing euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. People who want to die in one of these ways tend to suffer not from unremitting pain but from depression, hopelessness, and fear of losing their dignity and control. The people they leave behind inevitably feel they have somehow failed. The answer to these symptoms is not ending a life but getting help. I have long argued that we should focus on giving all terminally ill people a good, compassionate deathnot euthanasia or assisted suicide for a tiny minority.

I am talking about how long I want to live and the kind and amount of health care I will consent to after 75. Americans seem to be obsessed with exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins and supplements, all in a valiant effort to cheat death and prolong life as long as possible. This has become so pervasive that it now defines a cultural type: what I call the American immortal.

I reject this aspiration. I think this manic desperation to endlessly extend life is misguided and potentially destructive. For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop.

What are those reasons? Lets begin with demography. We are growing old, and our older years are not of high quality. Since the mid-19th century, Americans have been living longer. In 1900, the life expectancy of an average American at birth was approximately 47 years. By 1930, it was 59.7; by 1960, 69.7; by 1990, 75.4. Today, a newborn can expect to live about 79 years. (On average, women live longer than men. In the United States, the gap is about five years. According to the National Vital Statistics Report, life expectancy for American males born in 2011 is 76.3, and for females it is 81.1.)

In the early part of the 20th century, life expectancy increased as vaccines, antibiotics, and better medical care saved more children from premature death and effectively treated infections. Once cured, people who had been sick largely returned to their normal, healthy lives without residual disabilities. Since 1960, however, increases in longevity have been achieved mainly by extending the lives of people over 60. Rather than saving more young people, we are stretching out old age.

The American immortal desperately wants to believe in the compression of morbidity. Developed in 1980 by James F. Fries, now a professor emeritus of medicine at Stanford, this theory postulates that as we extend our life spans into the 80s and 90s, we will be living healthier livesmore time before we have disabilities, and fewer disabilities overall. The claim is that with longer life, an ever smaller proportion of our lives will be spent in a state of decline.

Compression of morbidity is a quintessentially American idea. It tells us exactly what we want to believe: that we will live longer lives and then abruptly die with hardly any aches, pains, or physical deteriorationthe morbidity traditionally associated with growing old. It promises a kind of fountain of youth until the ever-receding time of death. It is this dreamor fantasythat drives the American immortal and has fueled interest and investment in regenerative medicine and replacement organs.

But as life has gotten longer, has it gotten healthier? Is 70 the new 50?

Not quite. It is true that compared with their counterparts 50 years ago, seniors today are less disabled and more mobile. But over recent decades, increases in longevity seem to have been accompanied by increases in disabilitynot decreases. For instance, using data from the National Health Interview Survey, Eileen Crimmins, a researcher at the University of Southern California, and a colleague assessed physical functioning in adults, analyzing whether people could walk a quarter of a mile; climb 10 stairs; stand or sit for two hours; and stand up, bend, or kneel without using special equipment. The results show that as people age, there is a progressive erosion of physical functioning. More important, Crimmins found that between 1998 and 2006, the loss of functional mobility in the elderly increased. In 1998, about 28 percent of American men 80 and older had a functional limitation; by 2006, that figure was nearly 42 percent. And for women the result was even worse: more than half of women 80 and older had a functional limitation. Crimminss conclusion: There was an increase in the life expectancy with disease and a decrease in the years without disease. The same is true for functioning loss, an increase in expected years unable to function.

This was confirmed by a recent worldwide assessment of healthy life expectancy conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington. The researchers included not just physical but also mental disabilities such as depression and dementia. They found not a compression of morbidity but in fact an expansionan increase in the absolute number of years lost to disability as life expectancy rises.

How can this be? My father illustrates the situation well. About a decade ago, just shy of his 77th birthday, he began having pain in his abdomen. Like every good doctor, he kept denying that it was anything important. But after three weeks with no improvement, he was persuaded to see his physician. He had in fact had a heart attack, which led to a cardiac catheterization and ultimately a bypass. Since then, he has not been the same. Once the prototype of a hyperactive Emanuel, suddenly his walking, his talking, his humor got slower. Today he can swim, read the newspaper, needle his kids on the phone, and still live with my mother in their own house. But everything seems sluggish. Although he didnt die from the heart attack, no one would say he is living a vibrant life. When he discussed it with me, my father said, I have slowed down tremendously. That is a fact. I no longer make rounds at the hospital or teach. Despite this, he also said he was happy.

As Crimmins puts it, over the past 50 years, health care hasnt slowed the aging process so much as it has slowed the dying process. And, as my father demonstrates, the contemporary dying process has been elongated. Death usually results from the complications of chronic illnessheart disease, cancer, emphysema, stroke, Alzheimers, diabetes.

Take the example of stroke. The good news is that we have made major strides in reducing mortality from strokes. Between 2000 and 2010, the number of deaths from stroke declined by more than 20 percent. The bad news is that many of the roughly 6.8 million Americans who have survived a stroke suffer from paralysis or an inability to speak. And many of the estimated 13 million more Americans who have survived a silent stroke suffer from more-subtle brain dysfunction such as aberrations in thought processes, mood regulation, and cognitive functioning. Worse, it is projected that over the next 15 years there will be a 50 percent increase in the number of Americans suffering from stroke-induced disabilities. Unfortunately, the same phenomenon is repeated with many other diseases.

So American immortals may live longer than their parents, but they are likely to be more incapacitated. Does that sound very desirable? Not to me.

The situation becomes of even greater concern when we confront the most dreadful of all possibilities: living with dementia and other acquired mental disabilities. Right now approximately 5 million Americans over 65 have Alzheimers; one in three Americans 85 and older has Alzheimers. And the prospect of that changing in the next few decades is not good. Numerous recent trials of drugs that were supposed to stall Alzheimersmuch less reverse or prevent ithave failed so miserably that researchers are rethinking the whole disease paradigm that informed much of the research over the past few decades. Instead of predicting a cure in the foreseeable future, many are warning of a tsunami of dementiaa nearly 300 percent increase in the number of older Americans with dementia by 2050.

Half of people 80 and older with functional limitations. A third of people 85 and older with Alzheimers. That still leaves many, many elderly people who have escaped physical and mental disability. If we are among the lucky ones, then why stop at 75? Why not live as long as possible?

Even if we arent demented, our mental functioning deteriorates as we grow older. Age-associated declines in mental-processing speed, working and long-term memory, and problem-solving are well established. Conversely, distractibility increases. We cannot focus and stay with a project as well as we could when we were young. As we move slower with age, we also think slower.

It is not just mental slowing. We literally lose our creativity. About a decade ago, I began working with a prominent health economist who was about to turn 80. Our collaboration was incredibly productive. We published numerous papers that influenced the evolving debates around health-care reform. My colleague is brilliant and continues to be a major contributor, and he celebrated his 90th birthday this year. But he is an outliera very rare individual.

American immortals operate on the assumption that they will be precisely such outliers. But the fact is that by 75, creativity, originality, and productivity are pretty much gone for the vast, vast majority of us. Einstein famously said, A person who has not made his great contribution to science before the age of 30 will never do so. He was extreme in his assessment. And wrong. Dean Keith Simonton, at the University of California at Davis, a luminary among researchers on age and creativity, synthesized numerous studies to demonstrate a typical age-creativity curve: creativity rises rapidly as a career commences, peaks about 20 years into the career, at about age 40 or 45, and then enters a slow, age-related decline. There are some, but not huge, variations among disciplines. Currently, the average age at which Nobel Prizewinning physicists make their discoverynot get the prizeis 48. Theoretical chemists and physicists make their major contribution slightly earlier than empirical researchers do. Similarly, poets tend to peak earlier than novelists do. Simontons own study of classical composers shows that the typical composer writes his first major work at age 26, peaks at about age 40 with both his best work and maximum output, and then declines, writing his last significant musical composition at 52. (All the composers studied were male.)

This age-creativity relationship is a statistical association, the product of averages; individuals vary from this trajectory. Indeed, everyone in a creative profession thinks they will be, like my collaborator, in the long tail of the curve. There are late bloomers. As my friends who enumerate them do, we hold on to them for hope. It is true, people can continue to be productive past 75to write and publish, to draw, carve, and sculpt, to compose. But there is no getting around the data. By definition, few of us can be exceptions. Moreover, we need to ask how much of what Old Thinkers, as Harvey C. Lehman called them in his 1953 Age and Achievement, produce is novel rather than reiterative and repetitive of previous ideas. The age-creativity curveespecially the declineendures across cultures and throughout history, suggesting some deep underlying biological determinism probably related to brain plasticity.

We can only speculate about the biology. The connections between neurons are subject to an intense process of natural selection. The neural connections that are most heavily used are reinforced and retained, while those that are rarely, if ever, used atrophy and disappear over time. Although brain plasticity persists throughout life, we do not get totally rewired. As we age, we forge a very extensive network of connections established through a lifetime of experiences, thoughts, feelings, actions, and memories. We are subject to who we have been. It is difficult, if not impossible, to generate new, creative thoughts, because we dont develop a new set of neural connections that can supersede the existing network. It is much more difficult for older people to learn new languages. All of those mental puzzles are an effort to slow the erosion of the neural connections we have. Once you squeeze the creativity out of the neural networks established over your initial career, they are not likely to develop strong new brain connections to generate innovative ideasexcept maybe in those Old Thinkers like my outlier colleague, who happen to be in the minority endowed with superior plasticity.

Maybe mental functionsprocessing, memory, problem-solvingslow at 75. Maybe creating something novel is very rare after that age. But isnt this a peculiar obsession? Isnt there more to life than being totally physically fit and continuing to add to ones creative legacy?

One university professor told me that as he has aged (he is 70) he has published less frequently, but he now contributes in other ways. He mentors students, helping them translate their passions into research projects and advising them on the balance of career and family. And people in other fields can do the same: mentor the next generation.

Mentorship is hugely important. It lets us transmit our collective memory and draw on the wisdom of elders. It is too often undervalued, dismissed as a way to occupy seniors who refuse to retire and who keep repeating the same stories. But it also illuminates a key issue with aging: the constricting of our ambitions and expectations.

We accommodate our physical and mental limitations. Our expectations shrink. Aware of our diminishing capacities, we choose ever more restricted activities and projects, to ensure we can fulfill them. Indeed, this constriction happens almost imperceptibly. Over time, and without our conscious choice, we transform our lives. We dont notice that we are aspiring to and doing less and less. And so we remain content, but the canvas is now tiny. The American immortal, once a vital figure in his or her profession and community, is happy to cultivate avocational interests, to take up bird watching, bicycle riding, pottery, and the like. And then, as walking becomes harder and the pain of arthritis limits the fingers mobility, life comes to center around sitting in the den reading or listening to books on tape and doing crossword puzzles. And then

Maybe this is too dismissive. There is more to life than youthful passions focused on career and creating. There is posterity: children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

But here, too, living as long as possible has drawbacks we often wont admit to ourselves. I will leave aside the very real and oppressive financial and caregiving burdens that many, if not most, adults in the so-called sandwich generation are now experiencing, caught between the care of children and parents. Our living too long places real emotional weights on our progeny.

Unless there has been terrible abuse, no child wants his or her parents to die. It is a huge loss at any age. It creates a tremendous, unfillable hole. But parents also cast a big shadow for most children. Whether estranged, disengaged, or deeply loving, they set expectations, render judgments, impose their opinions, interfere, and are generally a looming presence for even adult children. This can be wonderful. It can be annoying. It can be destructive. But it is inescapable as long as the parent is alive. Examples abound in life and literature: Lear, the quintessential Jewish mother, the Tiger Mom. And while children can never fully escape this weight even after a parent dies, there is much less pressure to conform to parental expectations and demands after they are gone.

Living parents also occupy the role of head of the family. They make it hard for grown children to become the patriarch or matriarch. When parents routinely live to 95, children must caretake into their own retirement. That doesnt leave them much time on their ownand it is all old age. When parents live to 75, children have had the joys of a rich relationship with their parents, but also have enough time for their own lives, out of their parents shadows.

But there is something even more important than parental shadowing: memories. How do we want to be remembered by our children and grandchildren? We wish our children to remember us in our prime. Active, vigorous, engaged, animated, astute, enthusiastic, funny, warm, loving. Not stooped and sluggish, forgetful and repetitive, constantly asking What did she say? We want to be remembered as independent, not experienced as burdens.

At age 75 we reach that unique, albeit somewhat arbitrarily chosen, moment when we have lived a rich and complete life, and have hopefully imparted the right memories to our children. Living the American immortals dream dramatically increases the chances that we will not get our wishthat memories of vitality will be crowded out by the agonies of decline. Yes, with effort our children will be able to recall that great family vacation, that funny scene at Thanksgiving, that embarrassing faux pas at a wedding. But the most-recent yearsthe years with progressing disabilities and the need to make caregiving arrangementswill inevitably become the predominant and salient memories. The old joys have to be actively conjured up.

Of course, our children wont admit it. They love us and fear the loss that will be created by our death. And a loss it will be. A huge loss. They dont want to confront our mortality, and they certainly dont want to wish for our death. But even if we manage not to become burdens to them, our shadowing them until their old age is also a loss. And leaving themand our grandchildrenwith memories framed not by our vivacity but by our frailty is the ultimate tragedy.

Seventy-five. That is all I want to live. But if I am not going to engage in euthanasia or suicide, and I wont, is this all just idle chatter? Dont I lack the courage of my convictions?

No. My view does have important practical implications. One is personal and two involve policy.

Once I have lived to 75, my approach to my health care will completely change. I wont actively end my life. But I wont try to prolong it, either. Today, when the doctor recommends a test or treatment, especially one that will extend our lives, it becomes incumbent upon us to give a good reason why we dont want it. The momentum of medicine and family means we will almost invariably get it.

My attitude flips this default on its head. I take guidance from what Sir William Osler wrote in his classic turn-of-the-century medical textbook, The Principles and Practice of Medicine: Pneumonia may well be called the friend of the aged. Taken off by it in an acute, short, not often painful illness, the old man escapes those cold gradations of decay so distressing to himself and to his friends.

My Osler-inspired philosophy is this: At 75 and beyond, I will need a good reason to even visit the doctor and take any medical test or treatment, no matter how routine and painless. And that good reason is not It will prolong your life. I will stop getting any regular preventive tests, screenings, or interventions. I will accept only palliativenot curativetreatments if I am suffering pain or other disability.

This means colonoscopies and other cancer-screening tests are outand before 75. If I were diagnosed with cancer now, at 57, I would probably be treated, unless the prognosis was very poor. But 65 will be my last colonoscopy. No screening for prostate cancer at any age. (When a urologist gave me a PSA test even after I said I wasnt interested and called me with the results, I hung up before he could tell me. He ordered the test for himself, I told him, not for me.) After 75, if I develop cancer, I will refuse treatment. Similarly, no cardiac stress test. No pacemaker and certainly no implantable defibrillator. No heart-valve replacement or bypass surgery. If I develop emphysema or some similar disease that involves frequent exacerbations that would, normally, land me in the hospital, I will accept treatment to ameliorate the discomfort caused by the feeling of suffocation, but will refuse to be hauled off.

What about simple stuff? Flu shots are out. Certainly if there were to be a flu pandemic, a younger person who has yet to live a complete life ought to get the vaccine or any antiviral drugs. A big challenge is antibiotics for pneumonia or skin and urinary infections. Antibiotics are cheap and largely effective in curing infections. It is really hard for us to say no. Indeed, even people who are sure they dont want life-extending treatments find it hard to refuse antibiotics. But, as Osler reminds us, unlike the decays associated with chronic conditions, death from these infections is quick and relatively painless. So, no to antibiotics.

Obviously, a do-not-resuscitate order and a complete advance directive indicating no ventilators, dialysis, surgery, antibiotics, or any other medicationnothing except palliative care even if I am conscious but not mentally competenthave been written and recorded. In short, no life-sustaining interventions. I will die when whatever comes first takes me.

As for the two policy implications, one relates to using life expectancy as a measure of the quality of health care. Japan has the third-highest life expectancy, at 84.4 years (behind Monaco and Macau), while the United States is a disappointing No. 42, at 79.5 years. But we should not care about catching up withor measure ourselves againstJapan. Once a country has a life expectancy past 75 for both men and women, this measure should be ignored. (The one exception is increasing the life expectancy of some subgroups, such as black males, who have a life expectancy of just 72.1 years. That is dreadful, and should be a major focus of attention.) Instead, we should look much more carefully at childrens health measures, where the U.S. lags, and shamefully: in preterm deliveries before 37 weeks (currently one in eight U.S. births), which are correlated with poor outcomes in vision, with cerebral palsy, and with various problems related to brain development; in infant mortality (the U.S. is at 6.17 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, while Japan is at 2.13 and Norway is at 2.48); and in adolescent mortality (where the U.S. has an appalling recordat the bottom among high-income countries).

A second policy implication relates to biomedical research. We need more research on Alzheimers, the growing disabilities of old age, and chronic conditionsnot on prolonging the dying process.

Many people, especially those sympathetic to the American immortal, will recoil and reject my view. They will think of every exception, as if these prove that the central theory is wrong. Like my friends, they will think me crazy, posturingor worse. They might condemn me as being against the elderly.

Again, let me be clear: I am not saying that those who want to live as long as possible are unethical or wrong. I am certainly not scorning or dismissing people who want to live on despite their physical and mental limitations. Im not even trying to convince anyone Im right. Indeed, I often advise people in this age group on how to get the best medical care available in the United States for their ailments. That is their choice, and I want to support them.

And I am not advocating 75 as the official statistic of a complete, good life in order to save resources, ration health care, or address public-policy issues arising from the increases in life expectancy. What I am trying to do is delineate my views for a good life and make my friends and others think about how they want to live as they grow older. I want them to think of an alternative to succumbing to that slow constriction of activities and aspirations imperceptibly imposed by aging. Are we to embrace the American immortal or my 75 and no more view?

I think the rejection of my view is literally natural. After all, evolution has inculcated in us a drive to live as long as possible. We are programmed to struggle to survive. Consequently, most people feel there is something vaguely wrong with saying 75 and no more. We are eternally optimistic Americans who chafe at limits, especially limits imposed on our own lives. We are sure we are exceptional.

I also think my view conjures up spiritual and existential reasons for people to scorn and reject it. Many of us have suppressed, actively or passively, thinking about God, heaven and hell, and whether we return to the worms. We are agnostics or atheists, or just dont think about whether there is a God and why she should care at all about mere mortals. We also avoid constantly thinking about the purpose of our lives and the mark we will leave. Is making money, chasing the dream, all worth it? Indeed, most of us have found a way to live our lives comfortably without acknowledging, much less answering, these big questions on a regular basis. We have gotten into a productive routine that helps us ignore them. And I dont purport to have the answers.

But 75 defines a clear point in time: for me, 2032. It removes the fuzziness of trying to live as long as possible. Its specificity forces us to think about the end of our lives and engage with the deepest existential questions and ponder what we want to leave our children and grandchildren, our community, our fellow Americans, the world. The deadline also forces each of us to ask whether our consumption is worth our contribution. As most of us learned in college during late-night bull sessions, these questions foster deep anxiety and discomfort. The specificity of 75 means we can no longer just continue to ignore them and maintain our easy, socially acceptable agnosticism. For me, 18 more years with which to wade through these questions is preferable to years of trying to hang on to every additional day and forget the psychic pain they bring up, while enduring the physical pain of an elongated dying process.

Seventy-five years is all I want to live. I want to celebrate my life while I am still in my prime. My daughters and dear friends will continue to try to convince me that I am wrong and can live a valuable life much longer. And I retain the right to change my mind and offer a vigorous and reasoned defense of living as long as possible. That, after all, would mean still being creative after 75.

Go here to read the rest:
Why I Hope to Die at 75 - The Atlantic

Read More...

Longevity – Wikipedia

Thursday, October 20th, 2016

The word "longevity" is sometimes used as a synonym for "life expectancy" in demography - however, the term "longevity" is sometimes meant to refer only to especially long-lived members of a population, whereas "life expectancy" is always defined statistically as the average number of years remaining at a given age. For example, a population's life expectancy at birth is the same as the average age at death for all people born in the same year (in the case of cohorts). Longevity is best thought of as a term for general audiences meaning 'typical length of life' and specific statistical definitions should be clarified when necessary.

Reflections on longevity have usually gone beyond acknowledging the brevity of human life and have included thinking about methods to extend life. Longevity has been a topic not only for the scientific community but also for writers of travel, science fiction, and utopian novels.

There are many difficulties in authenticating the longest human life span ever by modern verification standards, owing to inaccurate or incomplete birth statistics. Fiction, legend, and folklore have proposed or claimed life spans in the past or future vastly longer than those verified by modern standards, and longevity narratives and unverified longevity claims frequently speak of their existence in the present.

A life annuity is a form of longevity insurance.

Various factors contribute to an individual's longevity. Significant factors in life expectancy include gender, genetics, access to health care, hygiene, diet and nutrition, exercise, lifestyle, and crime rates. Below is a list of life expectancies in different types of countries:[3]

Population longevities are increasing as life expectancies around the world grow:[1][4]

The Gerontology Research Group validates current longevity records by modern standards, and maintains a list of supercentenarians; many other unvalidated longevity claims exist. Record-holding individuals include:[citation needed]

Evidence-based studies indicate that longevity is based on two major factors, genetics and lifestyle choices.[5]

Twin studies have estimated that approximately 20-30% the variation in human lifespan can be related to genetics, with the rest due to individual behaviors and environmental factors which can be modified.[6] Although over 200 gene variants have been associated with longevity according to a US-Belgian-UK research database of human genetic variants,[7] these explain only a small fraction of the heritability.[8] A 2012 study found that even modest amounts of leisure time physical exercise can extend life expectancy by as much as 4.5 years.[9]

Lymphoblastoid cell lines established from blood samples of centenarians have significantly higher activity of the DNA repair protein PARP (Poly ADP ribose polymerase) than cell lines from younger (20 to 70 year old) individuals.[10] The lymphocytic cells of centenarians have characteristics typical of cells from young people, both in their capability of priming the mechanism of repair after H2O2 sublethal oxidative DNA damage and in their PARP gene expression.[11] These findings suggest that elevated PARP gene expression contributes to the longevity of centenarians, consistent with the DNA damage theory of aging.[12]

A study of the regions of the world known as blue zones, where people commonly live active lives past 100 years of age, speculated that longevity is related to a healthy social and family life, not smoking, eating a plant-based diet, frequent consumption of legumes and nuts, and engaging in regular physical activity.[13] In a cohort study, the combination of a plant based diet, normal BMI, and not smoking accounted for differences up to 15 years in life expectancy.[14] Korean court records going back to 1392 indicate that the average lifespan of eunuchs was 70.0 1.76 years, which was 14.419.1 years longer than the lifespan of non-castrated men of similar socio-economic status.[15] The Alameda County Study hypothesized three additional lifestyle characteristics that promote longevity: limiting alcohol consumption, sleeping 7 to 8 hours per night, and not snacking (eating between meals), although the study found the association between these characteristics and mortality is "weak at best".[16] There are however many other possible factors potentially affecting longevity, including the impact of high peer competition, which is typically experienced in large cities.[17]

In preindustrial times, deaths at young and middle age were more common than they are today. This is not due to genetics, but because of environmental factors such as disease, accidents, and malnutrition, especially since the former were not generally treatable with pre-20th century medicine. Deaths from childbirth were common in women, and many children did not live past infancy. In addition, most people who did attain old age were likely to die quickly from the above-mentioned untreatable health problems. Despite this, we do find many examples of pre-20th century individuals attaining lifespans of 75 years or greater, including Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Cato the Elder, Thomas Hobbes, Eric of Pomerania, Christopher Polhem, and Michelangelo. This was also true for poorer people like peasants or laborers. Genealogists will almost certainly find ancestors living to their 70s, 80s and even 90s several hundred years ago.

For example, an 1871 census in the UK (the first of its kind, but personal data from other censuses dates back to 1841 and numerical data back to 1801) found the average male life expectancy as being 44, but if infant mortality is subtracted, males who lived to adulthood averaged 75 years. The present male life expectancy in the UK is 77 years for males and 81 for females, while the United States averages 74 for males and 80 for females.

Studies have shown that black American males have the shortest lifespans of any group of people in the US, averaging only 69 years (Asian-American females average the longest).[18] This reflects overall poorer health and greater prevalence of heart disease, obesity, diabetes, and cancer among black American men.

Women normally outlive men, and this was as true in pre-industrial times as today. Theories for this include smaller bodies (and thus less stress on the heart), a stronger immune system (since testosterone acts as an immunosuppressant), and less tendency to engage in physically dangerous activities.

There is a current debate as to whether or not the pursuit of longevity is a worthwhile health care goal for the United States. Bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel, who is also one of the architects of ObamaCare, has stated that the pursuit of longevity via the compression of morbidity explanation is a "fantasy" and that life is not worth living after age 75; therefore longevity should not be a goal of health care policy.[19] This has been refuted by neurosurgeon Miguel Faria, who states that life can be worthwhile in healthy old age; that the compression of morbidity is a real phenomenon; that longevity should be pursued in association with quality of life.[20] Faria has discussed how longevity in association with leading healthy lifestyles can lead to the postponement of senescence as well as happiness and wisdom in old age.[21]

All of the biological organisms have a limited longevity, and different species of animals and plants have different potentials of longevity. Misrepair-accumulation aging theory [22][23] suggests that the potential of longevity of an organism is related to its structural complexity.[24] Limited longevity is due to the limited structural complexity of the organism. If a species of organisms has too high structural complexity, most of its individuals would die before the reproduction age, and the species could not survive. This theory suggests that limited structural complexity and limited longevity are essential for the survival of a species.

Longevity traditions are traditions about long-lived people (generally supercentenarians), and practices that have been believed to confer longevity.[25][26] A comparison and contrast of "longevity in antiquity" (such as the Sumerian King List, the genealogies of Genesis, and the Persian Shahnameh) with "longevity in historical times" (common-era cases through twentieth-century news reports) is elaborated in detail in Lucian Boia's 2004 book Forever Young: A Cultural History of Longevity from Antiquity to the Present and other sources.[27]

The Fountain of Youth reputedly restores the youth of anyone who drinks of its waters. The New Testament, following older Jewish tradition, attributes healing to the Pool of Bethesda when the waters are "stirred" by an angel.[28] After the death of Juan Ponce de Len, Gonzalo Fernndez de Oviedo y Valds wrote in Historia General y Natural de las Indias (1535) that Ponce de Len was looking for the waters of Bimini to cure his aging.[29] Traditions that have been believed to confer greater human longevity also include alchemy,[30] such as that attributed to Nicolas Flamel. In the modern era, the Okinawa diet has some reputation of linkage to exceptionally high ages.[31]

More recent longevity claims are subcategorized by many editions of Guinness World Records into four groups: "In late life, very old people often tend to advance their ages at the rate of about 17 years per decade .... Several celebrated super-centenarians (over 110 years) are believed to have been double lives (father and son, relations with the same names or successive bearers of a title) .... A number of instances have been commercially sponsored, while a fourth category of recent claims are those made for political ends ...."[32] The estimate of 17 years per decade was corroborated by the 1901 and 1911 British censuses.[32] Mazess and Forman also discovered in 1978 that inhabitants of Vilcabamba, Ecuador, claimed excessive longevity by using their fathers' and grandfathers' baptismal entries.[32][33]Time magazine considered that, by the Soviet Union, longevity had been elevated to a state-supported "Methuselah cult".[34]Robert Ripley regularly reported supercentenarian claims in Ripley's Believe It or Not!, usually citing his own reputation as a fact-checker to claim reliability.[35]

The U.S. Census Bureau view on the future of longevity is that life expectancy in the United States will be in the mid-80s by 2050 (up from 77.85 in 2006) and will top out eventually in the low 90s, barring major scientific advances that can change the rate of human aging itself, as opposed to merely treating the effects of aging as is done today. The Census Bureau also predicted that the United States would have 5.3 million people aged over 100 in 2100. The United Nations has also made projections far out into the future, up to 2300, at which point it projects that life expectancies in most developed countries will be between 100 and 106 years and still rising, though more and more slowly than before. These projections also suggest that life expectancies in poor countries will still be less than those in rich countries in 2300, in some cases by as much as 20 years. The UN itself mentioned that gaps in life expectancy so far in the future may well not exist, especially since the exchange of technology between rich and poor countries and the industrialization and development of poor countries may cause their life expectancies to converge fully with those of rich countries long before that point, similarly to the way life expectancies between rich and poor countries have already been converging over the last 60 years as better medicine, technology, and living conditions became accessible to many people in poor countries. The UN has warned that these projections are uncertain, and cautions that any change or advancement in medical technology could invalidate such projections.[36]

Recent increases in the rates of lifestyle diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease, may eventually slow or reverse this trend toward increasing life expectancy in the developed world, but have not yet done so. The average age of the US population is getting higher[37] and these diseases show up in older people.[38]

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel examined how much mortality from various causes would have to drop in order to boost life expectancy and concluded that most of the past increases in life expectancy occurred because of improved survival rates for young people. She states that it seems unlikely that life expectancy at birth will ever exceed 85 years.[39]Michio Kaku argues that genetic engineering, nanotechnology and future breakthroughs will accelerate the rate of life expectancy increase indefinitely.[40] Already genetic engineering has allowed the life expectancy of certain primates to be doubled, and for human skin cells in labs to divide and live indefinitely without becoming cancerous.[41]

However, since 1840, record life expectancy has risen linearly for men and women, albeit more slowly for men. For women the increase has been almost three months per year, for men almost 2.7 months per year. In light of steady increase, without any sign of limitation, the suggestion that life expectancy will top out must be treated with caution. Scientists Oeppen and Vaupel observe that experts who assert that "life expectancy is approaching a ceiling ... have repeatedly been proven wrong." It is thought that life expectancy for women has increased more dramatically owing to the considerable advances in medicine related to childbirth.[42]

Mice have been genetically engineered to live twice as long as ordinary mice. Drugs such as deprenyl are a part of the prescribing pharmacopia of veterinarians specifically to increase mammal lifespan. A large plurality of research chemicals have been described at the scientific literature that increase the lifespan of a number of species.

Some argue that molecular nanotechnology will greatly extend human life spans. If the rate of increase of life span can be raised with these technologies to a level of twelve months increase per year, this is defined as effective biological immortality and is the goal of radical life extension.

Currently living:

Non-living:

Certain exotic organisms do not seem to be subject to aging and can live indefinitely. Examples include Tardigrades and Hydras. That is not to say that these organisms cannot die, merely that they only die as a result of disease or injury rather than age-related deterioration (and that they are not subject to the Hayflick limit).

Longevity

Here is the original post:
Longevity - Wikipedia

Read More...

Can meditation slow rate of cellular aging? Cognitive …

Friday, September 30th, 2016

Abstract

Understanding the malleable determinants of cellular aging is critical to understanding human longevity. Telomeres may provide a pathway for exploring this question. Telomeres are the protective caps at the ends of chromosomes. The length of telomeres offers insight into mitotic cell and possibly organismal longevity. Telomere length has now been linked to chronic stress exposure and depression. This raises the question of how might cellular aging be modulated by psychological functioning.

We consider two psychological processes or states that are in opposition to one another--threat cognition and mindfulness--and their effects on cellular aging. Psychological stress cognitions, particularly appraisals of threat and ruminative thoughts, can lead to prolonged states of reactivity. In contrast, mindfulness meditation techniques appear to shift cognitive appraisals from threat to challenge, decrease ruminative thought, and reduce stress arousal. Mindfulness may also directly increase positive arousal states.

We review data linking telomere length to cognitive stress and stress arousal and present new data linking cognitive appraisal to telomere length. Given the pattern of associations revealed so far, we propose that some forms of meditation may have salutary effects on telomere length by reducing cognitive stress and stress arousal and increasing positive states of mind and hormonal factors that may promote telomere maintenance. Aspects of this model are currently being tested in ongoing trials of mindfulness meditation.

Keywords: meditation, mindfulness, stress, appraisal, rumination, telomere length, telomerase

Chronological age is the ultimate predictor of disease and death. However, tremendous individual variability is found in onset of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is of great scientific and clinical interest to identify markers of biological age, as well as factors that influence them. Telomere length (TL) appears to be such an indicator. TL shortens with chronological age, predicts risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) independent of age, and is shortened in people with age-related diseases, including atherosclerosis and diabetes.1 Stress appears to influence the rate of telomere shortening.2 Here we examine links between TL, stress arousal, and stress cognitions, and consider how mindfulness meditation might alter these pathways, as well as have direct effects independent of stress pathways.

There are specific types of stress cognitions that lead to greater stress arousal and thus may impact cell longevity. Threat appraisals enhance negative emotional responses to a stressor by construing it as a threat to oneself and amplifying the significance of the stressor. In addition to the content of an appraisal, the process of rumination about negative appraisals prolongs the stress arousal, and can induce distress about the emotional response itself. These two types of stress cognition then trigger negative emotional responses tied to specific forms of physiological arousal (high catabolic, low anabolic profiles) which can impair telomere length.

Mindfulness is a psychological process that acts on specific parts of this cognitive content and process, disrupting the stress pathways and possibly having direct salutary effects on physiological arousal systems. Based on a combination of empirical data and speculation, we propose that these processes, stress cognition and mindfulness, may be linked to cellular aging, shown in . Below we offer a selective review on the literatures of cell aging (telomeres and telomerase), stress cognition (threat appraisals and rumination) and their effects on arousal relevant to telomere maintenance, and lastly, the potential impact of mindfulness and meditation on these stress processes.

Model of Mindfulness Meditation Effects on Telomere Length through Positive and Stressful Cognitive States

Telomeres provide a unique model for understanding cell aging and senescence. Telomeres are the protective nucleoprotein structures capping the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, consisting of a simple repeat sequence (TTAGGG). When cells divide, the end of the telomere cap may not be replicated because the DNA polymerase does not function properly at the end of a DNA strand.3 Therefore telomeres tend to shorten with mitosis so that cells in older organisms have on average shorter telomeres than cells in younger organisms.

Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein reverse transcriptase cellular enzyme that counteracts TL shortening and adds telomeric DNA to shortened telomeres. Telomerase thus forestalls shortened telomeres from signaling the cell to cease dividing or to die. Telomerase promotes cell longevity even in the face of critically shortened telomeres.4 Conversely, cells with short telomeres without telomerase are at highest risk of fusions, senescence, and apoptosis.5,6 Thus, it is in part the interaction between short telomeres and low telomerase activity that appears to increase the risk of cell death.7

Telomere shortening and replicative senescence is thought to be indicative of bodily aging. Several genetic premature aging syndromes are characterized by cell sencescence (Werner Syndrome, Progeria Hutchinson Guilford, and ataxia teleangiecstasia); at least when subjects cells are examined in vitro, and are characterized by signs of accelerated aging and early mortality.8 There is a proliferation of research in this area, and many studies show that TL is linked to a variety of disease states. Shorter TL is related to aspects of cardiovascular disease, such as plaques,9 heart attacks10 greater calcific aortic valve stenosis 11, vascular dementia 12 and degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis13 and osteoporosis.14 It has also been related to diabetes15,16 and general risk factors for chronic disease, including obesity and insulin resistance.16,17 Lastly, TL in leukocytes predicted earlier mortality in a community sample, and in samples with Alzheimers disease and history of stroke.18-20

Given the role of telomere maintenance to cell longevity and apparently human longevity, it is important to find the nexus of how psychological function might affect this longevity system. We first examined whether young healthy women under chronic stress had shorter telomeres than those with low levels of life stress. We found that objective stress (years of caregiving) and perceptions of life stress were both related to shorter telomere length.21 We have found similar relationships with dementia caregivers and controls (unpublished data). Others have since found shortened telomeres in major depression,22 and in those with lower socioeconomic status.23 Thus, stressful life circumstances, stress appraisals, and severe distress, appear to be related to greater telomere shortening.

It is nevertheless difficult to predict who is most vulnerable to telomere shortening when exposed to similar conditions of chronic stress. Here we briefly review some of the important psychological (cognitive and emotional) aspects of stress, and then physiological stress mediators that are likely related to cell aging as well. We note, however, that psychological function is only one of many factors influencing telomere length in adulthood, and a lifespan approach may be the best way to understand telomere length at any one moment in time 24.

Given the huge individual variance in perception and reaction to common stressful events, the process of coping with challenge is an important mediator of emotional reactions25 and presumably physiological reactivity.

A prevailing model for understanding what makes a situation stressful is Lazarus and Folkmans (1984) Stress and Coping Theory.26 Situations where a goal that matters to the person is at stake and the demands of the situation outweigh the persons resources for coping with it can cause feelings of stress. We may feel stressed when a situation harms or threatens important goals (threat appraisals). In contrast, in a stressful situation, a person might see the possibility of doing well at coping and thus perceive the stressor as a challenge (challenge appraisals). Here, we focus on threat appraisals, which according to our model is the harmful type of stress, linked to cell aging.

Cognitive appraisal in turn affects choice of coping strategy. Coping refers to constantly changing (moment to moment) cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage the demands of a stressful situation.26 A key aspect of the appraisal process is the evaluation of personal control over the outcome. Situations in which there is the possibility of control usually call for behaviorally active, problem-focused coping strategies; situations in which nothing can be done usually call for cognitive strategies that help the person accept the situation or regulate their emotional responses to it.27,28 Accurate appraisals are important to enact effective coping (e. g., to prevent mismatches such as attempting to exert control over an uncontrollable situation).

In our original study on stress and cell aging among maternal caregivers, we examined perceptions of life stress, using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS),29 among healthy women (n = 65), some caring for a child with a chronic condition and others caring for healthy children. As reported elsewhere, the full scale score assessing stress-related feelings and thoughts over the last month was significantly related to shorter TL (r = 0.31), after covarying age and body mass index.2 Here we examine which aspects of stress perception on the PSS are linked to TL. Three of the 10 items were significantly related to TL, and these items represent the three core components of perceived stress: the two cognitive components, which include the perception that demands outweigh coping resources and a loss of control, represented by the question difficulties were piling up so high I could not overcome them, (r = 0.40, p < .002) and feeling unable to control important things in life (r = 0.28, p < .05); and the face-valid emotional component of stress represented by the question feeling nervous or stressed, (r = 0.40, p < .002). This item analysis suggests that specific stress cognitions may be related to TL, at least in this sample of women.

Appraisals also drive emotional states. Threat appraisals drive negative emotions (such as fear and anxiety), whereas challenge appraisals can foster both negative (e.g., anxiety) and positive emotions (e.g., feeling energized and elated).26,30 According to Stress and Coping Theory, 26 the coping process begins when an event is appraised as threatening or challenging. These appraisals prompt both emotional states and coping efforts. If the event is resolved favorably, a positive emotional state (e.g., relief, satisfaction) ensues. If the event is resolved unfavorably or if it remains unresolved, a negative emotional state results (e.g., anger, guilt, anxiety) and the coping process continues through reappraisal and continued rounds of coping.

Many people in modern societies are dealing with at least one, if not multiple, chronic life stressor, such as financial, relationship, work or caregiving stressors. What are the coping mechanisms people use to maintain positive affect and a positive outlook? In dealing with chronic stressors, the negative emotion associated with unfavorable resolution can in some cases motivate positive changes. Negative states motivate meaning-focused coping processes such as those that draw on important goals and values, 31-33 including goal-directed problem-focused coping, positive reappraisal, benefit finding and benefit reminding about a specific situation, 34 and infusion of ordinary events with meaning.35 These coping processes result in positive emotion, which serve important coping functions: they provide a psychological time-out from the distress associated with chronic stress and help motivate and sustain ongoing efforts to cope with the negative effects of the chronic stressor.36

There appears to be such a strong drive to experience positive emotions, such that people facing chronic adversity may be driven to reorganize their outlook on life. In the course of coping with chronic stress, people often develop cognitive shifts or changes in ones mental filter that promotes positive appraisals. These are distinct from acute stress appraisals and coping strategies. We call these cognitive shifts psychological thriving.37 Thriving includes a range of positive appraisals such as greater appreciation of life, or self growth (new skills and feeling empowered). These changes are not tied to specific situations, but rather serve as meta-cognitions about ones life. These shifts may stay with a person (i.e., become ingrained schemas) and affect future appraisals as well. We suspect that psychological thriving shifts situational appraisals of everyday minor stressors toward challenge appraisals, and decreases rumination. In this way, psychological thriving may promote a state of enhanced allostasis, a state where one has lower basal stress arousal, more efficient reactivity peaks, quicker recovery, and greater anabolic functioning after stress, as described in detail elsewhere.37,38

We do not know which individual or situation factors, in the course of chronic stress, cause some people to engage in positive coping, while others remain more fixed in their thinking. It is possible that mindfulness training can help foster positive coping and eventually psychological thriving.

Here, we report a preliminary test of one aspect of this model, the link between acute stress appraisals and telomere length. We asked whether acute appraisals to a standardized stressor are linked to telomere length. In the maternal caregiver study described above, we also examined response to an acute laboratory psychosocial stressor, an adapted form of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST).39 Before the stressor, we measured thoughts and emotions linked to threat and challenge appraisals based on theory and research.27,40,41 Participants rated how much they felt each of 6 emotions, including worried, anxious, or fearful (threat emotions) and eager, confident, and hopeful (challenge emotions). They also rated expectations for the task, including anticipated success, difficulty of the task, perceptions of control over the task, and effort they would need to exert.

An exploratory factor analysis was performed requesting two factors, with a varimax rotation. All items loaded on one of two factors, with loadings of .59 or higher, accounting for 51% of the total variance, supporting the existence of threat and challenge appraisal factors. The threat factor (Eigenvalue of 2.8) included the threat emotions and scoring high on expected difficulty. The challenge factor (Eigenvalue of 2.4) included scoring high on challenge emotions, high anticipated success, high perceived control, and expecting to exert high effort. Factor scores were created and examined independently and as a ratio of challenge to threat, in case relative levels of appraisal mattered. There were no correlations between TL with challenge (.07) or threat (r = .00) factors, suggesting that neither type of appraisal alone is associated with telomere shortening. However, the ratio of challenge to threat was significantly correlated with longer telomeres (r = .26, p < .05), suggesting that appraising a standardized stressor as more challenging than threatening may be related to longer TL. Appraisals are complex, even with a short lab stressor. In response to the upcoming laboratory stressor, people made both challenge and threat appraisals. Given the correlation between appraisal ratio and TL, and that telomere length is a cumulative measure, one that changes slowly over years, it appears that the predominant appraisal, determined by the relative balance of appraisals, is likely related to habitual ways of responding to small daily stressors.

The neuroendocrine system and autonomic nervous system which regulate the stress response are important physiological mediators between emotional stress and illness. Chronic stress can depress levels of heart rate variability or vagal tone, an index of the counterregulatory response to sympathetic arousal. For example, low vagal tone has been related to work stress42, depression43 and low socioeconomic status.44

Chronic stress can lead to dysregulation of the hypothalamic pituitary axis, which can take many forms, such as a blunted diurnal rhythm of cortisol or elevated basal levels.45,46 Flattened rhythm in turn can predict various indicators of physical and mental health, such as coronary calcification47 and metastatic breast cancer progression.48 Chronic stress can suppress levels of certain anabolic hormones, such as DHEA or insulin like growth factor 49 and can increase levels of insulin and visceral fat 50. Anabolic hormones such as testosterone appear to suppress or counterregulate the catabolic and sympathetic stress response 51 thus playing an important role in endocrine balance. Lastly, acute and chronic stress appear to increase levels of oxidative stress.52 These relationships between stress and neuroendocrine balance have been reviewed extensively elsewhere.49,53-55

Strong positive and negative emotions associated with appraisals can induce changes in physiological arousal systems. A primary construct for understanding appraisal and arousal is perceived control. Perceptions of control help determine whether a situation is appraised as a threat or challenge, and these appraisals in turn are primary determinants of physiological stress responses. Classic stress research has shown that feeling a lack of control over a stressor, including a sense of unpredictability and uncertainty, stimulates cortisol reactivity.56 A meta-analysis across studies of psychological laboratory stressors showed that conditions of social evaluative threat (perceptions that ego relevant aspects of ones identity will be negatively judged) and low control, are potent stimulants of the adrenal gland, with additive effects for both.57

Little research has examined positive emotions and physiology, and no research to our knowledge has compared high vs. low arousal positive states. Positive emotional states may promote a more salutary pattern of arousal. High arousal positive states, such as sports competition, vicariously experiencing winning, or experiencing challenge appraisals while successfully coping with an acute stressor, may activate certain anabolic hormones such as testosterone and DHEA-S.58-60 Lower arousal emotions, such as feeling composed, calm and peaceful are associated with greater vagal tone (parasympathetic activity) 61 and possibly to higher DHEA.62 Low DHEA at baseline has also been related to greater subsequent threat appraisals and negative affect in response to a stressor, suggesting it promotes affective vulnerability to acute stress.63 Thus, there are likely bidirectional relationships between neuroendocrine balance of anabolic and catabolic hormones, and appraisals. We suggest that the anabolic (mainly androgens and vagal tone) response to positive states, both high arousal states (challenge) and low arousal states (relaxation) may be one key to the effects of mindfulness on physical health (See , Positive states).

When a coping outcome is appraised as unfavorable and the goal remains highly valued, people feel more negative affect and may engage in rumination, repetitive thought that is not goal directed. Depressive rumination, a negative self-focus on assumed basic faults, can prolong negative mood and over time predict depression.64 Negative affect and rumination may further lead to prolonged cardiovascular recovery.65-67 State rumination has been related to higher salivary cortisol after acute stress.68

As yet few studies attempt to link cell aging to stress arousal. In our initial study of healthy young women, those with shorter telomeres excreted higher levels of both cortisol and epinephrine in their urine overnight, 69 suggesting chronically elevated stress response system activity. When examining telomerase, we found that low telomerase was related to greater basal hemodynamic arousal (heart rate, blood pressure), lower heart rate variability, and greater sympathetic reactivity to lab stress.69 Low telomerase was related to lower resting vagal tone and a greater dip in vagal tone in response to an acute lab stressor independent of resting vagal tone.

Endocrine and biochemical milieu can affect rate of telomere shortening with each cell division. Oxidative stress, characterized by excess free radicals, shortens telomeres, whereas telomerase can rebuild and thus lengthen the telomere. Further, in vitro evidence in various cell lines suggests that certain anabolic hormones, including growth hormone, 70 IGF-1,71-73 and estrogen, 74,75 can promote telomerase activity. In contrast, insulin and insulin resistance are related to telomere shortness.17 These same pathways may be affected by chronic stress and meditation, discussed further below.

Here we review meditation techniques theorized to positively modulate stress-related cognitive processes and arousal with implications for cellular aging. We first outline the theoretical claims and practice of mindfulness meditation, in particular, based on a large body of theory and research in this area, and examine other forms of meditation when applicable. We then review research linking mindfulness states, mindfulness meditation, and other types of meditation to aspects of stress cognition, coping, and emotional reactivity. Lastly, we review research linking meditation to stress arousal.

At the outset, we note the Buddhist origins of mindfulness meditation techniques and acknowledge that scientific understandings of mindfulness have developed largely independent of Buddhist paradigms, theory, and goals (for a discussion on this issue, see 76,77). Mindfulness meditation has been adapted to Western secular contexts to treat patients with a variety of physical and psychological conditions and research to date has predominantly focused on its efficacy to improve these conditions and examine underlying mechanisms. In contrast, in Buddhist settings, mindfulness is one aspect of a set of integrated spiritual practices, beliefs, and teachings aimed at achieving insight into the nature and cause of suffering and realizing spiritual freedom.77 These differing goals and contexts have implications for the understanding of mindfulness and so we emphasize the importance of not mistaking secular, therapeutic conceptualizations of mindfulness, as we focus on here, for Buddhist conceptualizations. Notwithstanding these issues, we would argue that the adaptation of mindfulness to Western contexts retains at least some of its essential ingredients and appears to be beneficial. Thus, it is within this larger context that we aim to review the scientific literature on mindfulness. We specifically focus on the relation of mindfulness to stress related cognitions, affect, and coping processes using Stress and Coping theory as a framework to propose mechanisms through which mindfulness, and other forms of meditation, may positively impact stress arousal and cellular aging.

Mindfulness is considered an inherent aspect of consciousness that can be enhanced through a variety of mental training techniques collectively referred to as mindfulness meditation. Mindfulness, translated from the Pali word sati (Sanskrit: smrti), literally means to remember. In the traditional Buddhist context, it means to adhere to an object of consciousness with a clear mental focus in a given moment 78. This simple definition contrasts with the multidimensional conceptualization of mindfulness by contemporary Western scientists. Although scientists have yet to agree on a precise definition,76,79-81 the most commonly cited one belongs to pioneer Jon Kabat-Zinn, who defined it as paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment and non-judgmentally 82 (p.4). Kabat-Zinn adds an attitudinal dimension to the state of mindfulnesss, that of nonjudgmentalness. Other researchers following his lead have described the attitude as one of curiosity and acceptance80 or kindness, compassion, and patience. 83 Thus, in addition to characterizing mindfulness as a form of attention regulation as in the Buddhist definition, scientists emphasize the importance of the cognitive and emotional manner in which attention is deployed.

Instructions for the formal practice of mindfulness meditation entail purposefully directing attention to ones experience in the present moment with an attitude of open curiosity and acceptance.80 An upright sitting posture with minimal movement is encouraged (with eyes either open or closed) to allow the body to relax and the mind to remain alert. Attention is directed to a pre-determined object, usually localized sensations involving respiration, such as those at the tip of the nose (external objects can also be used, such as a picture). Novice practitioners usually report that after a short period of time, they become distracted by thoughts, feelings, sounds, or physical sensations and their focus on the intended object is lost. At this point, the instruction is to notice these experiences (distractions) fully without judgment, to let them go, and return attention back to its intended object. Instructions for attending to distractions vary - from silently applying a specific label to the object (e.g., anger, anticipation, sound) to applying the general term thinking to any thought, to not making any mental notation whatsoever. Labeling an experience is believed to strengthen recognition of it and this may be particularly helpful for some individuals or when experiencing intense distractions. The process of becoming distracted and returning the attention is repeated over and over again during formal mindfulness practice. The goal is to increase awareness of present-moment experience to increasingly subtle levels and to strengthen stability of attention. The goal is not to ignore or get rid of thought in order to have a blank mind, but to notice with full attention whatever arises. In this sense, there are no distractions; whatever is noticed in the field of awareness can be observed. Interestingly, it can be painful to observe thoughts one wishes to avoid, so in this sense, the practice cultivates a willingness to experience discomfort and reduces attempts to escape it. At the other extreme, the goal is not to indulge in pleasant thought or achieve a pleasant experience (although this may occur), but to remain aware of each experience as it occurs.

A fundamental shift in the relation to thought and other objects of awareness is considered a pivotal, key mechanism of mindfulness training. This metacognitive process has been referred to as decentering and reperceiving, processes which have been similarly defined.79,84 Here we use the term reperceiving, which is defined as a shift in perspective in that what was previously subject becomes object (p. 378); or, in other words, consciousness becomes awareness of thought rather than thought itself. This shift in perspective is hypothesized to lead to the realization that I am not that thought allowing for greater flexibility in how to respond to thought or any experience when it occurs. This insight is argued to have manifold salutary effects on psychological functioning further elaborated below.81 We feel this is a key process for defusing stress cognitions, as described in detail below (under appraisal and rumination sections).

Mindful states of consciousness are not confined to formal meditation practice, but are thought to carry over into daily activities. Additionally, as mindfulness is considered an innate capacity of human consciousness, individuals without formal training are thought to vary in the extent to which they are mindful. As such, self-report measures of dispositional mindfulness have been developed using non-meditators 85,86. Effects of mindfulness training have most commonly been studied a) in the context of an eight-week group intervention program, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) 87 or variations of this program tailored to meet the needs of specific populations, b) using brief inductions of mindfulness in laboratory settings, or c) comparing experienced meditators to controls, findings of which are highlighted below.

As noted, a central aspect of mindfulness training involves the self-regulation of attention. In support, recent studies find improved performance on attention-related behavioral tasks after mindfulness training. Jha and colleagues found improved ability to orient attention in response to an environmental cue, enhancing response accuracy and reaction time on a computerized task among MBSR participants compared to meditation-nave participants.88 The researchers also found individuals who completed a one-month mindfulness-based residential retreat increased accuracy of a target location when no prior cue was presented compared to controls, indicating an enhanced vigilant state of alertness. These findings suggest that mindfulness enhances attention-related responsiveness to environmental cues and ability to maintain alertness.

In line with these findings, two studies have shown that meditation training is associated with inhibition of habitual responding on the classic Stroop task, in which participants are asked to name the colored text of a word rather than the word itself (e.g., the correct response to the word red appearing in blue-colored font is blue). 89,90 Although a contrived laboratory task, the findings support the suggestion that automatic, top-down information processing is reduced following certain forms of meditation practice. One implication of the deautomatization of thought is that it should lead to enhanced ability to notice nuanced details of experience from a fresh perspective and inhibit reliance on memories, expectations, and schemas during information processing.91

Meditation training has further been shown to reduce elaborative processing of previous stimuli thereby increasing attentional resources to present-moment experience.92 The distribution of attentional resources as measured by performance on an attentional-blink task improved after a 3-month intensive mindfulness-based meditation retreat compared to controls.92 Scalp-recorded brain potentials showed reduced brain-resource allocation to the first target embedded in a rapid stream of stimuli enabling increased identification of the second target.

Enhanced attention-related processes are hypothesized to improve early detection of potential stressors and increase the probability that effective coping will be implemented in a timely manner (Teasdale et al, 1995). Increased awareness of present-moment experience may also disrupt ruminative thought processes that play a role in prolonged stress reactivity and vulnerability to mental illness (Teasdale et al, 1995).

In addition, training in present-moment awareness appears to increase interoceptive processes, which involve awareness of visceral signals and subtle emotional feelings thought to be important in emotion regulation.93 Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, increased neural activity of brain regions involved in processing present-moment experience was found following eight weeks of mindfulness training compared to controls.94 Specifically, viscerosomatic brain areas showed greater activation (including the insula, secondary somatosensory cortex and infereior parietal lobule) when meditators compared to novices were asked to maintain an experiential momentary experience vs. a narrative self-focus after presentation of personality traits.94 In a study of long-term mindfulness meditation practitioners, magnetic resonance imaging revealed greater cortical thickness in brain regions associated with interoception, including the right anterior insula, compared to controls.95 These studies provide neural evidence that mindfulness meditation cultivates interoceptive awareness, which is thought to play a key role in maintaining present moment awareness and regulating emotions.

In regards to cognitive appraisals, to the extent mindfulness reduces identification with self-related cognition and goals through enhanced attention to present-moment experience and reperceiving, situations may be appraised as less threatening. Heppner and Kernis 96 argue that individuals who report greater dispositional mindfulness are less likely to interpret ambiguous behavior by others as reflecting hostile intent, and report less anger and desire to retaliate. In a mindfulness meditation induction experiment (as described in Heppner et al, 2007, citing unpublished analyses), participants exposed to a brief mindfulness practice (mindful eating of a raisin) displayed less aggressive behavior following social rejection compared to control participants. They suggest these participants may have experienced reduced reactivity to social threat because they attributed less hostile intent to the actor. In a study of relationship stress among romantic couples, those with higher dispositional mindfulness reported relatively more positive perceptions of their partner and relationship after discussing a conflict in a laboratory setting.97 A randomized waitlist-controlled trial of an abbreviated MBSR program conducted among adults at their work-site, found reductions in global appraisals of life stress (using the Perceived Stress Scale) compared to control group participants.98

These studies support the notion that mindfulness facilitates interpretation of situations as less threatening, perhaps due to less activation of self-relevant concerns, so that events are responded to more thoughtfully, rather than reacted to through automatic filters of cognitive and emotional processes. Mindfulness is argued to promote cognitive balance, the ability to see clearly beyond assumptions, preventing common and habitual cognitive distortions.99

Mindfulness may also improve coping with events that are appraised as threatening in which there is little possibility of control. Mindfulness may serve to increase a sense of control, not simply by reacting more coolly, (with attenuated cycles of negative thoughts and emotions), but by lessening ones perceived need to be in control, especially when situations are determined to be uncontrollable. In one controlled mindfulness-based meditation intervention of 28 healthy participants, those in the treatment group reported both increases in sense of control over life and increased willingness to let go of control efforts (greater use of acceptance/yielding to cope with stressors).100

Mindfulness training also improves the ability of patients to cope with a variety of chronic disease-related stressors that often afford limited opportunities for control. A meta-analysis of 20 studies examining effects of MBSR in patients with chronic illnesses (including cancer, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain) as well as those seeking to reduce stress, found a moderate effect size (Cohens d = ~.50) across observational, waitlist-controlled, and active-controlled studies.101 Improvements in psychological functioning (e.g., anxiety and depressive symptoms, copying style) were observed in addition to improvements in physical health symptoms, including pain and physical impairment and function. Large, well-controlled studies that assess the active ingredients of mindfulness are still needed, yet the accumulated studies offer encouragement that MBSR is helpful in enhancing patients ability to cope with a wide range of chronic illnesses.

Several other forms of meditation have been shown to reduce threat appraisals and enhance adaptive coping. A randomized controlled trial of mantra meditation (repeating a spiritually-related word or phrase throughout the day, including a focus on noticing and interrupting stressful thoughts) showed an increase in positive reappraisal, the tendency to reframe situations in a more positive light.102 Robins, McCain et al. 2006 conducted an uncontrolled study of Tai Chi, a form of moving meditation focusing on breath, in a sample of 59 participants with HIV. Although they found no changes in other types of coping, there was a significant increase in positive reappraisal.103

Lastly, a randomized study of Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) which incorporates a variety of somatic and cognitive techniques including meditation, progressive muscle relaxation, cognitive restructuring, assertiveness training, and anger management, examined responses to a standardized laboratory stressor (TSST, described above). They found that those in CBSM made fewer stress appraisals, both threat and challenge, and experienced greater expected control. These appraisals mediated lower cortisol responses to the stressor.104 A similar study followed 28 students, randomized to CBSM or a waitlist control group, and measured stress appraisals before a naturalistic stressor (an exam). Compared to the control group, those who received CBSM were less likely to appraise the exam as threatening (although equally likely to appraise it as challenging, thus changing the appraisal ratio), and had marginally greater perceived competence.105 These studies show that forms of meditation practice and stress reduction other than mindfulness also reduce stress-related cognitions, partly by shifting appraisals of events from threatening to positive and/or challenging.

One key way in which mindfulness may protect one from the negative effects of stress is by decreasing rumination. Increasing awareness of present-moment experience may disrupt ruminative thought processes that play a role in prolonged stress reactivity. 106 The typical instructions for mindfulness meditation, to notice thoughts and let them go, target the discursive mind the tendency to revisit the same thoughts repeatedly. As thoughts and feelings are experienced as transient mental events occurring within a wider context of awareness, attenuation of automatic identification and reactivity to them may occur. Over time, this more objective perspective on mental content, referred to as meta-cognitive awareness, may interrupt ruminative thinking, increase the ability to evaluate the accuracy of thoughts, and allow greater freedom of choice in responding to thoughts and emotions.84

The practice of changing how one relates to thoughts and emotions contrasts with cognitive behavioral therapies that emphasize changing the content of thoughts. Mindfulness practice involves first allowing awareness of thought and then becoming less engaged or attached to the thoughts themselves before attempting to evaluate their accuracy.99 This type of non-reactivity to inner experiences such as negative thoughts is one factor of a multi-factorial self-report measure of mindfulness.86

There are several studies that examine mindfulness and rumination. Mindfulness, as an individual difference variable, is related to less rumination.107,108 Conversely, mindfulness is negatively related to the more trait-like automatic habit of negative thinking,108 suggesting that it may prevent tonic dysphoria and low self esteem, in addition to playing a role in coping with stressors. A recent randomized trial suggests that mindfulness training reduces ruminative thought and distraction to a larger extent than somatic relaxation. This reduction in rumination is thought to be key to reducing distress.109

Mindfulness may also influence the secondary response to negative emotions that perpetuates the cycle of negative thoughts (distress about distress). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT), based on the MBSR program, specifically targets rumination and negative thought patterns associated with depression. A primary goal of the MBCT intervention developed for people with a history of depression is to shift the way participants relate to depressive thoughts and emotions, a process referred to as decentering, in that thoughts are experienced more objectively as passing events in the mind rather than accurate reflections of reality. The program has been found to be effective for reducing depression relapse in currently non-depressed patients in randomized usual-care controlled trials.84,110 Using semi-structured interview techniques to elicit memories of mildly depressive situations, the researchers found that mindfulness training increased the ability of participants to view their depressive thoughts and emotions with greater discrimination, evaluate the appropriateness of their thoughts and feelings, and gain greater perspective that their thoughts were self-generated rather than accurate reflections of reality.

Mindfulness is theorized to enhance emotion regulation skills by increasing awareness of emotions, increasing the willingness to tolerate and accept distressing or uncomfortable emotions, and reducing emotional reactivity to provocative events and emotions themselves.111

The proposal that mindfulness improves affect regulation through enhanced awareness of emotional processes is supported by three studies on reactivity to emotional stimuli. In one study, participants were asked to label emotions expressed on human faces while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Individuals scoring higher on a measure of trait mindfulness showed enhanced prefrontal cortical regulation of affect and reduced bilateral amygdala activity (typically associated with negative affective states) during affect labeling compared to a control labeling task.112 Furthermore, those with high vs. low trait mindfulness showed strong negative associations between areas of prefrontal cortex and right amygdala activity. These findings point to neural substrates that may underlie aspects of the reperceiving process in which consciousness is shifted from identification with emotion to conscious awareness of emotion. The effect of this cognitive shift may be to disrupt or inhibit automatic affective responses, reducing their intensity and duration.112,113

Brief mindfulness-based meditation training has been shown to reduce reactivity to emotional stimuli and increase willingness to be exposed to or tolerate negative stimuli. Participants who participated in a 15-minute focused breathing exercise akin to exercises taught in MBSR, reported less negative affect in response to images known to elicit negative emotions compared to two control groups instructed to either let their minds wander for 15 minutes or worry about certain aspects of their lives.111 The mindfulness participants also continued to report moderate levels of positive affect throughout exposure to emotionally neutral images and were more willing to view additional negative images compared to the control groups.

In a randomized waitlist-controlled MBSR trial among employees, Davidson and colleagues (2003) found an increased pattern of left-sided anterior brain activation, known to be associated with state and trait positive affect, in response to positive and negative mood inductions in MBSR participants compared to waitlist group from pre to post intervention. Left-sided anterior activation has been associated with quicker emotional recovery following a negative event.114 These studies indirectly support the idea that mindfulness promotes adaptive regulation of emotion.

In addition, mindfulness is linked to greater emotional well-being across studies with differing methodologies, including correlations of self-report levels of mindfulness with self-report emotional well-being, mindfulness induction experiments conducted in laboratories, and clinical trial interventions, as reviewed by Brown et al (2007). Trait levels of mindfulness have been associated with fewer emotional disturbances (e.g., depressive and anxiety symptoms), greater affective balance high positive affect and low negative affect, and less difficulties with emotional regulation.85,86 In a 2-week experience-sampling study, reports of greater state mindfulness were associated with affective balance (higher positive affect and lower negative affect), independent of trait mindfulness.85

Mindfulness is also although thought to increase intensity and frequency of positive and pro-social emotions, including empathy, kindness and compassion for self and others (Wallace and Shapiro, 2006). A randomized study of mindfulness-based stress reduction demonstrated increased scores on a measure of empathy, the capacity to notice and feel what another is feeling.115

In summary, the early research reviewed above suggests that mindfulness appears to reduce stress cognitions both the negative content of threat appraisals, the ruminative process of revisiting negative thoughts, as well as the secondary response of feeling distress about feeling distress.

In addition to mitigating stress-related cognitions and emotions, some types of meditation appear to reduce markers of stress arousal, both through the HPA axis, increasing vagal tone, and reducing markers of sympathetic arousal. Transcendental meditation (TM), a concentrative technique that uses silent repetition of a word or phrase as the object of awareness, has been the most extensively studied meditative technique. It appears to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure to levels comparable to pharmacologic treatment116 and improves heart rate variability compared to an active control group.117 It also appears to lower basal cortisol and lead to greater cortisol peaks in response to an acute stressor,118-120 a profile that might be described as enhanced allostasis.38,121 TM and a similar type of concentrative meditation (the relaxation response technique) are also characterized by decreased oxygen consumption,122,123 carbon dioxide elimination,124,125 and salutary EEG patterns (theta and alpha activation).126

Little research has evaluated specifically the effects of mindfulness meditation on HPA axis arousal or autonomic activity127 although similar effects as those found with transcendental meditation and the relaxation response could be predicted to occur. In one uncontrolled MBSR intervention study, cancer patients consistently showed decreased daily average cortisol values after one year of follow-up .128 In a second study, lower cortisol responses to mental stress were observed after five days of practicing an integrated mind-body meditation approach incorporating mindfulness compared to a randomized relaxation control group.129 However, one caveat is that mindfulness includes acknowledgement of distressing thoughts and feelings, which may initially increase arousal and emotional activity, but viewed as a developmental process, may progressively lead to decreased reactivity through enhanced awareness, tolerance of discomfort, and acceptance. Thus, for beginners, and periodically for experienced practitioners, mindfulness meditation is expected to produce increases in physiologic arousal.130

Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of CBSM on reducing peripheral stress arousal. CBSM training reduced urinary free cortisol and epinephrine in clinical samples.131,132 In one study of healthy participants, CBSM led to lower cortisol reactivity in response to a standardized laboratory stressor within 2 weeks104 and, to a lesser extent, four months after the intervention.133 To the extent that mindfulness or other forms of meditation promote the ability to buffer oneself from social evaluative threat -- recognizing that negative social judgments or reflected appraisals of the self (what one thinks others think about oneself) do not necessarily represent reality or a threat to ones self-worth, practitioners should indeed become less stress reactive.

Although concentrative and mindfulness meditation techniques may reduce HPA axis and autonomic arousal, the brain appears to respond to specific types of meditation in ways that may represent an adaptive attentional state to appraise stimuli. An fMRI study of meditation practitioners (who practiced Kundalini meditation in which focused attention on respiration is linked to silent repetition of a phrase found increased activation of localized neural structures involved in attention (frontal and parietal cortex) and control of the autonomic nervous system (pregenual anterior cingulate, amygdala, midbrain, and hypothalamus) compared to a control nonmeditative condition.134 These data suggest that as some meditation practices produce deep physical relaxation evidenced by reductions in autonomic and HPA arousal, these practitioners were engaged in an active attentional state of autonomic control, countering the notion that meditation is a state of mental as well as physical relaxation.

Further evidence suggests that meditation effects are not simply the result of volitionally reduced peripheral arousal. Results of a study comparing neural correlates of mindfulness meditation and respiratory biofeedback found that while some regions are engaged by both tasks, mindfulness meditation activates additional neural regions (e.g., right anterior insula).135 Thus, while some forms of meditation engage attentional resources to induce a hypometablic state benefical for managing stress-related arousal, they also appear to modulate cognitive and emotional processes involved in the appraisal of stress, such as interoception.

Several meditation studies have measured markers of positive health, such as anabolic hormones, and these may have relevance for cellular aging. As discussed above and reviewed elsewhere, several stress reduction interventions have induced increased heart rate variability and increased anabolic hormones such as DHEA.136 Several uncontrolled studies of TM show healthier profiles of arousal, including greater levels of DHEA-S.120,137

Across controlled studies, mindfulness meditation appears to improve physical health symptoms and functioning across a variety of disorders, and increases measures of mental health, including reduced negative affect and increased quality of life.138,139 It is thought that these positive effects are mediated in part by reductions in psychological and physiological stress. TM has been linked to reduced cardiovascular disease risk factors and in controlled trials, has reduced blood pressure116 and carotid artery atherosclerosis 140 as reviewed by Walton and colleagues.1412893

Oxidative stress may be an important mediator between stress and disease. It is linked to cardiovascular disease, as well as telomere shortening. Although few studies have examined oxidative stress balance, two initial studies found that meditation practitioners (TM and Zen) had lower levels of a marker of oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation).142,143

Stress cognitions are important for survival, but if they are based on distorted perceptions, they may promote excessive stress arousal, creating a harmful milieu for cellular longevity. During the longevity conference that these proceedings are based upon, H.H. the Dalai Lama explained that emotions based on reason and analysis, tend to drive meaningful behavior. In contrast, emotions based on false projections or fear-based beliefs are harmful to longevity. Here, as shown in , we speculate that certain types of meditation can increase awareness of present moment experience leading to positive cognitions, primarily by increasing meta-cognitive awareness of thought, a sense of control (and decreased need to control), and increased acceptance of emotional experience. These cognitive states and skills reduce cognitive stress and thus ability for more accurate appraisals, reducing exaggerated threat appraisals and rumination, and distress about distress. These positive states are thus stress-buffering. Increasing positive states and decreasing stress cognitions may in turn slow the rate of cellular aging.

There is some indirect support of aspects of this hypothesis involving stress cognitions. In our previous study, perceived life stress -- primarily an inability to cope with demands and feeling a lack of control, and higher nocturnal stress hormones (cortisol and catecholamines) were related to shorter telomere length.2 Trait negative mood was related to lower telomerase activity, a precursor of telomere shortening.144 Here we presented preliminary data from the same sample linking telomere length to higher proportions of challenge appraisals relative to threat appraisals in response to a standardized stressor. The results suggest that the relative balance of threat to challenge cognitions may be important in buffering against the long term wear and tear effects of stressors. To the extent that meditation mitigates stress-related cognitions and propagation of negative emotions and negative stress arousal, a longstanding practice of mindfulness or other forms of meditation may indeed decelerate cellular aging.

We also speculate about the physiological mechanisms. Above we have reviewed data linking stress arousal and oxidative stress to telomere shortness. Meditative practices appear to improve the endocrine balance toward positive arousal (high DHEA, lower cortisol) and decrease oxidative stress. Thus, meditation practices may promote mitotic cell longevity both through decreasing stress hormones and oxidative stress and increasing hormones that may protect the telomere. There is much evidence of neuroendocrine and physical health benefits from TM, which has a longer history of study than MBSR. The newer studies of mindfulness meditation are promising, and offer insight into specific cognitive processes of how it may serve as an antidote to cognitive stress states.

This field of stress induced cell aging is young, our model is highly speculative, and there are considerable gaps in our knowledge of the potential effects of meditation on cell aging. Several laboratories are working on diverse aspects of this model, which will soon allow it to be evaluated in light of the empirical data.

24. Epel ES. Telomeres: A new psychobiomarker for a lifespan approach? Current Directions in Psychology. 2008 in press.

26. Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1984.

31. Folkman S, Moskowitz J. The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications. Psychology Press; Hove, UK: 2007. Positive affect and meaning-focused coping during significant psychological stress; pp. 193208.

33. Park CL, Folkman S. Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology. 1997;2:115144.

34. Tennen H, Affleck G. Benefit-finding and benefit-reminding. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psycholog. 584-597. Oxford University Press; London: 2002.

35. Folkman S, Moskowitz J, Ozer E, Park C. Positive meaningful events and coping in the context of HIV/AIDS. In: Gottlieb B, editor. Coping with Chronic Stress. Plenum; New York: 1997. pp. 293314.

36. Lazarus RS, Kanner AD, Folkman S. Emotions: A cognitive-phenomenological analysis. In: Plutchik R, Kellerman H, editors. Theories of emotion. Academic Press; New York: 1980.

37. Bower J, Low C, Moskowitz J, Sepah S, Epel E. Pathways from benefit finding to physical health: Enhanced psychological and physiological responses to stress. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2008 in press.

38. Epel E, McEwen B, Ickovics J. Embodying psychological thriving: Physical thriving in response to stress. Journal of Social Issues. 1998;54:301322.

49. Epel E, Burke H, Wolkowitz O. Psychoneuroendocrinology of Aging: Focus on anabolic and catabolic hormones. In: Aldwin C, Spiro A, Park C, editors. Handbook of Health Psychology of Aging. Guildford Press; 2007. pp. 119141.

53. Sterling P, Eyer J. Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In: Fisher S, Reason J, editors. Handbook of Life Stress: Cognition and Health. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 1988. pp. 629649.

60. Mendes WB, Ayduk O, Epel ES, Akinola M, Gyurak A. When stress is good for you: Neuroendocrine concomitants of physiological thriving. Harvard University; Boston: 2008.

62. Whitmore R, Maninger N, Wolfson W, Mendes WB, Epel ES. Relaxation increases DHEA; Paper presented at: Society of Behavioral Medicine; San Diego. 2008.

77. Rosch E. More than mindfulness: When you have a tiger by the tail, let it eat you. Taylor & Francis; United Kingdom: 2007.

78. Rosch E. More Than Mindfulness: When You Have a Tiger by the Tail, Let It Eat You. Psychological Inquiry. 2007 in press.

80. Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, et al. Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2004 Fal11(3):230241.

81. Brown K, Ryan R, Creswell JD. Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry. 2007;18(4):211237.

82. Kabat-Zinn J. Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion; New York: 1994.

87. Kabat-Zinn J. Full Catastrophe Living. Dell Publishing; New York: 1990.

91. Siegel D. The Mindful Brain. W.W. Norton and Company; New York: 2007.

96. Heppner WL, Kernis MH. Quiet ego functioning: The complementary roles of mindfulness, authenticity, and secure high self-esteem. Taylor & Francis; United Kingdom: 2007.

135. Lazar SW. Neural correlates of respiratory control during mindfulness meditation: Behavioral influences on respiration; Paper presented at: American Psychosomatic Society; Baltimore. 2008.

The rest is here:
Can meditation slow rate of cellular aging? Cognitive ...

Read More...

Happiness – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wednesday, September 28th, 2016

Happiness is a mental or emotional state of well-being defined by positive or pleasant emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy.[1] Happy mental states may also reflect judgements by a person about their overall well-being.[2] A variety of biological, psychological, economic, religious and philosophical approaches have striven to define happiness and identify its sources. Various research groups, including positive psychology and happiness economics are employing the scientific method to research questions about what "happiness" is, and how it might be attained.

The United Nations declared 20 March the International Day of Happiness to recognise the relevance of happiness and well-being as universal goals.

Philosophers and religious thinkers often define happiness in terms of living a good life, or flourishing, rather than simply as an emotion. Happiness in this sense was used to translate the Greek Eudaimonia, and is still used in virtue ethics. There has been a transition over time from emphasis on the happiness of virtue to the virtue of happiness.[3] Since the turn of the millennium, the human flourishing approach, advanced particularly by Amartya Sen has attracted increasing interest in psychological, especially prominent in the work of Martin Seligman, Ed Diener and Ruut Veenhoven, and international development and medical research in the work of Paul Anand.[citation needed]

A widely discussed political value expressed in the United States Declaration of Independence of 1776, written by Thomas Jefferson, is the universal right to "the pursuit of happiness."[4] This suggests a subjective interpretation but one that nonetheless goes beyond emotions alone.[citation needed]

Happiness is a fuzzy concept and can mean many different things to many people. Part of the challenge of a science of happiness is to identify different concepts of happiness, and where applicable, split them into their components. Related concepts are well-being, quality of life and flourishing. At least one author defines happiness as contentment.[5] Some commentators focus on the difference between the hedonistic tradition of seeking pleasant and avoiding unpleasant experiences, and the eudaimonic tradition of living life in a full and deeply satisfying way.[6]

The 2012 World Happiness Report stated that in subjective well-being measures, the primary distinction is between cognitive life evaluations and emotional reports.[7] Happiness is used in both life evaluation, as in How happy are you with your life as a whole?, and in emotional reports, as in How happy are you now?, and people seem able to use happiness as appropriate in these verbal contexts. Using these measures, the World Happiness Report identifies the countries with the highest levels of happiness.[citation needed]

Since the 1960s, happiness research has been conducted in a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including gerontology, social psychology, clinical and medical research and happiness economics. During the past two decades, however, the field of happiness studies has expanded drastically in terms of scientific publications, and has produced many different views on causes of happiness, and on factors that correlate with happiness,[8] but no validated method has been found to substantially improve long-term happiness in a meaningful way for most people.

Sonja Lyubomirsky concludes in her book The How of Happiness that 50 percent of a given human's happiness level is genetically determined (based on twin studies), 10 percent is affected by life circumstances and situation, and a remaining 40 percent of happiness is subject to self-control.[citation needed]

The results of the 75-year Grant Study of Harvard undergraduates show a high correlation of loving relationship, especially with parents, with later life wellbeing.[9]

In the 2nd Edition of the Handbook of Emotions (2000), evolutionary psychologists Leda Cosmides and John Tooby say that happiness comes from "encountering unexpected positive events". In the 3rd Edition of the Handbook of Emotions (2008), Michael Lewis says "happiness can be elicited by seeing a significant other". According to Mark Leary, as reported in a November 1995 issue of Psychology Today, "we are happiest when basking in the acceptance and praise of others". Sara Algoe and Jonathan Haidt say that "happiness" may be the label for a family of related emotional states, such as joy, amusement, satisfaction, gratification, euphoria, and triumph.[10]

It has been argued that money cannot effectively "buy" much happiness unless it is used in certain ways.[11] "Beyond the point at which people have enough to comfortably feed, clothe, and house themselves, having more money - even a lot more money - makes them only a little bit happier."[according to whom?] A Harvard Business School study found that "spending money on others actually makes us happier than spending it on ourselves".[12]

Meditation has been found to lead to high activity in the brain's left prefrontal cortex, which in turn has been found to correlate with happiness.[13]

Psychologist Martin Seligman asserts that happiness is not solely derived from external, momentary pleasures,[14] and provides the acronym PERMA to summarize Positive Psychology's correlational findings: humans seem happiest when they have

There have also been some studies of how religion relates to happiness. Causal relationships remain unclear, but more religion is seen in happier people. This correlation may be the result of community membership and not necessarily belief in religion itself. Another component may have to do with ritual.[15]

Abraham Harold Maslow, an American professor of psychology, founded humanistic psychology in the 1930s. A visual aid he created to explain his theory, which he called the hierarchy of needs, is a pyramid depicting the levels of human needs, psychological, and physical. When a human being ascends the steps of the pyramid, he reaches self-actualization. Beyond the routine of needs fulfillment, Maslow envisioned moments of extraordinary experience, known as peak experiences, profound moments of love, understanding, happiness, or rapture, during which a person feels more whole, alive, self-sufficient, and yet a part of the world. This is similar to the flow concept of Mihly Cskszentmihlyi.[citation needed]

Self-determination theory relates intrinsic motivation to three needs: competence, autonomy, and relatedness.

Cross-sectional studies worldwide support a relationship between happiness and fruit and vegetable intake. Those eating fruits and vegetables each day have a higher likelihood of being classified as very happy, suggesting a strong and positive correlation between fruit and vegetable consumption and happiness.[16] Whether it be in South Korea,[17] Iran,[18] Chile,[19] USA,[20] or UK,[21] greater fruit and vegetable consumption had a positive association with greater happiness, independent of factors such as smoking, exercise, body mass index, or socio-economic factors.

Religion and happiness have been studied by a number of researchers, and religion features many elements addressing the components of happiness, as identified by positive psychology. Its association with happiness is facilitated in part by the social connections of organized religion,[22] and by the neuropsychological benefits of prayer[23] and belief.

There are a number of mechanisms through which religion may make a person happier, including social contact and support that result from religious pursuits, the mental activity that comes with optimism and volunteering, learned coping strategies that enhance one's ability to deal with stress, and psychological factors such as "reason for being." It may also be that religious people engage in behaviors related to good health, such as less substance abuse, since the use of psychotropic substances is sometimes considered abuse.[24][25][26][27][28][29]

The Handbook of Religion and Health describes a survey by Feigelman (1992) that examined happiness in Americans who have given up religion, in which it was found that there was little relationship between religious disaffiliation and unhappiness.[30] A survey by Kosmin & Lachman (1993), also cited in this handbook, indicates that people with no religious affiliation appear to be at greater risk for depressive symptoms than those affiliated with a religion.[31] A review of studies by 147 independent investigators found, "the correlation between religiousness and depressive symptoms was -.096, indicating that greater religiousness is mildly associated with fewer symptoms."[32]

The Legatum Prosperity Index reflects the repeated finding of research on the science of happiness that there is a positive link between religious engagement and wellbeing: people who report that God is very important in their lives are on average more satisfied with their lives, after accounting for their income, age and other individual characteristics.[33]

Surveys by Gallup, the National Opinion Research Centre and the Pew Organisation conclude that spiritually committed people are twice as likely to report being "very happy" than the least religiously committed people.[34] An analysis of over 200 social studies contends that "high religiousness predicts a lower risk of depression and drug abuse and fewer suicide attempts, and more reports of satisfaction with sex life and a sense of well-being. However, the links between religion and happiness are always very broad in nature, highly reliant on scripture and small sample number. To that extent there is a much larger connection between religion and suffering (Lincoln 1034)."[32] And a review of 498 studies published in peer-reviewed journals concluded that a large majority of them showed a positive correlation between religious commitment and higher levels of perceived well-being and self-esteem and lower levels of hypertension, depression, and clinical delinquency.[35] A meta-analysis of 34 recent studies published between 1990 and 2001 found that religiosity has a salutary relationship with psychological adjustment, being related to less psychological distress, more life satisfaction, and better self-actualization.[36] Finally, a recent systematic review of 850 research papers on the topic concluded that "the majority of well-conducted studies found that higher levels of religious involvement are positively associated with indicators of psychological well-being (life satisfaction, happiness, positive affect, and higher morale) and with less depression, suicidal thoughts and behaviour, drug/alcohol use/abuse."[37]

However, there remains strong disagreement among scholars about whether the effects of religious observance, particularly attending church or otherwise belonging to religious groups, is due to the spiritual or the social aspectsi.e. those who attend church or belong to similar religious organizations may well be receiving only the effects of the social connections involved. While these benefits are real enough, they may thus be the same one would gain by joining other, secular groups, clubs, or similar organizations.[38]

Terror management theory maintains that people suffer cognitive dissonance (anxiety) when they are reminded of their inevitable death. Through terror management, individuals are motivated to seek consonant elements symbols which make sense of mortality and death in satisfactory ways (i.e. boosting self-esteem).

Research has found that strong belief in religious or secular meaning systems affords psychological security and hope. It is moderates (e.g. agnostics, slightly religious individuals) who likely suffer the most anxiety from their meaning systems. Religious meaning systems are especially adapted to manage death anxiety because they are unlikely to be disconfirmed (for various reasons), they are all encompassing, and they promise literal immortality.[39][40]

Whether emotional effects are beneficial or adverse seems to vary with the nature of the belief. Belief in a benevolent God is associated with lower incidence of general anxiety, social anxiety, paranoia, obsession, and compulsion whereas belief in a punitive God is associated with greater symptoms. (An alternative explanation is that people seek out beliefs that fit their psychological and emotional states.)[41]

Citizens of the world's poorest countries are the most likely to be religious, and researchers suggest this is because of religion's powerful coping abilities.[42][43] Luke Galen also supports terror management theory as a partial explanation of the above findings. Galen describes evidence (including his own research) that the benefits of religion are due to strong convictions and membership in a social group.[44][45][46]

Happiness forms a central theme of Buddhist teachings.[47] For ultimate freedom from suffering, the Noble Eightfold Path leads its practitioner to Nirvana, a state of everlasting peace. Ultimate happiness is only achieved by overcoming craving in all forms. More mundane forms of happiness, such as acquiring wealth and maintaining good friendships, are also recognized as worthy goals for lay people (see sukha). Buddhism also encourages the generation of loving kindness and compassion, the desire for the happiness and welfare of all beings.[48][49][unreliable source?]

Happiness or simcha (Hebrew: ) in Judaism is considered an important element in the service of God.[50] The biblical verse "worship The Lord with gladness; come before him with joyful songs," (Psalm 100:2) stresses joy in the service of God.[citation needed] A popular teaching by Rabbi Nachman of Breslov, a 19th-century Chassidic Rabbi, is "Mitzvah Gedolah Le'hiyot Besimcha Tamid," it is a great mitzvah (commandment) to always be in a state of happiness. When a person is happy they are much more capable of serving God and going about their daily activities than when depressed or upset.[51]

The primary meaning of "happiness" in various European languages involves good fortune, chance or happening. The meaning in Greek philosophy, however, refers primarily to ethics. In Catholicism, the ultimate end of human existence consists in felicity, Latin equivalent to the Greek eudaimonia, or "blessed happiness", described by the 13th-century philosopher-theologian Thomas Aquinas as a Beatific Vision of God's essence in the next life.[52] Human complexities, like reason and cognition, can produce well-being or happiness, but such form is limited and transitory. In temporal life, the contemplation of God, the infinitely Beautiful, is the supreme delight of the will. Beatitudo, or perfect happiness, as complete well-being, is to be attained not in this life, but the next.[53]

While religion is often formalised and community-oriented, spirituality tends to be individually based and not as formalised. In a 2014 study, 320 children, ages 812, in both public and private schools, were given a Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire assessing the correlation between spirituality and happiness. Spirituality and not religious practices (praying, attending church services) correlated positively with the child's happiness; the more spiritual the child was, the happier the child was. Spirituality accounted for about 326% of the variance in happiness.[54]

The Chinese Confucian thinker Mencius, who 2300 years ago sought to give advice to the ruthless political leaders of the warring states period, was convinced that the mind played a mediating role between the "lesser self" (the physiological self) and the "greater self" (the moral self) and that getting the priorities right between these two would lead to sage-hood. He argued that if we did not feel satisfaction or pleasure in nourishing one's "vital force" with "righteous deeds", that force would shrivel up (Mencius,6A:15 2A:2). More specifically, he mentions the experience of intoxicating joy if one celebrates the practice of the great virtues, especially through music.[55]

Al-Ghazali (10581111) the Muslim Sufi thinker wrote the Alchemy of Happiness, a manual of spiritual instruction throughout the Muslim world and widely practiced today.[citation needed]

The Hindu thinker Patanjali, author of the Yoga Sutras, wrote quite exhaustively on the psychological and ontological roots of bliss.[56]

In the Nicomachean Ethics, written in 350 BCE, Aristotle stated that happiness (also being well and doing well) is the only thing that humans desire for its own sake, unlike riches, honor, health or friendship. He observed that men sought riches, or honor, or health not only for their own sake but also in order to be happy. Note that eudaimonia, the term we translate as "happiness", is for Aristotle an activity rather than an emotion or a state.[57] Thus understood, the happy life is the good life, that is, a life in which a person fulfills human nature in an excellent way. Specifically, Aristotle argues that the good life is the life of excellent rational activity. He arrives at this claim with the Function Argument. Basically, if it's right, every living thing has a function, that which it uniquely does. For humans, Aristotle contends, our function is to reason, since it is that alone that we uniquely do. And performing one's function well, or excellently, is one's good. Thus, the life of excellent rational activity is the happy life. Aristotle does not leave it that, however. For he argues that there is a second best life for those incapable of excellent rational activity.This second best life is the life of moral virtue.[citation needed]

Many ethicists make arguments for how humans should behave, either individually or collectively, based on the resulting happiness of such behavior. Utilitarians, such as John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, advocated the greatest happiness principle as a guide for ethical behavior.[citation needed]

Friedrich Nietzsche savagely critiqued the English Utilitarians' focus on attaining the greatest happiness, stating "Man does not strive for happiness, only the Englishman does." Nietzsche meant that the making happiness one's ultimate goal, the aim of one's existence "makes one contemptible;" Nietzsche instead yearned for a culture that would set higher, more difficult goals than "mere happiness." Thus Nietzsche introduces the quasi-dystopic figure of the "last man" as a kind of thought experiment against the utilitarians and happiness-seekers; these small, "last men" who seek after only their own pleasure and health, avoiding all danger, exertion, difficulty, challenge, struggle are meant to seem contemptible to Nietzsche's reader. Nietzsche instead wants us to consider the value of what is difficult, what can only be earned through struggle, difficulty, pain and thus to come to see the affirmative value suffering and unhappiness truly play in creating everything of great worth in life, including all the highest achievements of human culture, not least of all philosophy.[58][59]

According to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, man's last end is happiness: "all men agree in desiring the last end, which is happiness."[60] However, where utilitarians focused on reasoning about consequences as the primary tool for reaching happiness, Aquinas agreed with Aristotle that happiness cannot be reached solely through reasoning about consequences of acts, but also requires a pursuit of good causes for acts, such as habits according to virtue.[61] In turn, which habits and acts that normally lead to happiness is according to Aquinas caused by laws: natural law and divine law. These laws, in turn, were according to Aquinas caused by a first cause, or God.[citation needed]

According to Aquinas, happiness consists in an "operation of the speculative intellect": "Consequently happiness consists principally in such an operation, viz. in the contemplation of Divine things." And, "the last end cannot consist in the active life, which pertains to the practical intellect." So: "Therefore the last and perfect happiness, which we await in the life to come, consists entirely in contemplation. But imperfect happiness, such as can be had here, consists first and principally in contemplation, but secondarily, in an operation of the practical intellect directing human actions and passions."[62]

Common market health measures such as GDP and GNP have been used as a measure of successful policy. On average richer nations tend to be happier than poorer nations, but this effect seems to diminish with wealth.[63][64] This has been explained by the fact that the dependency is not linear but logarithmic, i.e., the same percentual increase in the GNP produces the same increase in happiness for wealthy countries as for poor countries.[65][66][67][68] Increasingly, academic economists and international economic organisations are arguing for and developing multi-dimensional dashboards which combine subjective and objective indicators to provide a more direct and explicit assessment of human wellbeing. Work by Paul Anand and colleagues helps to highlight the fact that there many different contributors to adult wellbeing, that happiness judgement reflect, in part, the presence of salient constraints, and that fairness, autonomy, community and engagement are key aspects of happiness and wellbeing throughout the life course.

Libertarian think tank Cato Institute claims that economic freedom correlates strongly with happiness[69] preferably within the context of a western mixed economy, with free press and a democracy. According to certain standards, East European countries (ruled by Communist parties) were less happy than Western ones, even less happy than other equally poor countries.[70]

However, much empirical research in the field of happiness economics, such as that by Benjamin Radcliff, professor of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame, supports the contention that (at least in democratic countries) life satisfaction is strongly and positively related to the social democratic model of a generous social safety net, pro-worker labor market regulations, and strong labor unions.[71] Similarly, there is evidence that public policies that reduce poverty and support a strong middle class, such as a higher minimum wage, strongly affects average levels of well-being.[72]

It has been argued that happiness measures could be used not as a replacement for more traditional measures, but as a supplement.[73] According to professor Edward Glaeser, people constantly make choices that decrease their happiness, because they have also more important aims. Therefore, the government should not decrease the alternatives available for the citizen by patronizing them but let the citizen keep a maximal freedom of choice.[74]

It has been argued that happiness at work is one of the driving forces behind positive outcomes at work, rather than just being a resultant product.[75]

Several scales have been used to measure happiness:

The UK began to measure national well being in 2012,[83] following Bhutan which already measured gross national happiness.[citation needed]

A correlation has been found between hormone levels and happiness. SSRIs, such as Prozac, are used to adjust the levels of seratonin in the clinically unhappy. Researchers, such as Alexander, have indicated that many peoples usage of narcotics may be the unwitting result of attempts to readjust hormone levels to cope with situations that make them unhappy.[84]

A positive relationship has been found between the volume of gray matter in the right precuneus area of the brain and the subject's subjective happiness score.[85] Interestingly meditation, including mindfulness, based interventions have been found to correlate with a significant gray matter increase within the precuneus.[86][87][88][89][90]

In 2005 a study conducted by Andrew Steptow and Michael Marmot at University College London, found that happiness is related to biological markers that play an important role in health.[91] The researchers aimed to analyze whether there was any association between well-being and three biological markers: heart rate, cortisol levels, and plasma fibrinogen levels. Interestingly, the participants who rated themselves the least happy had cortisol levels that were 48% higher than those who rated themselves as the most happy. The least happy subjects also had a large plasma fibrinogen response to two stress-inducing tasks: the Stroop test, and tracing a star seen in a mirror image. Repeating their studies three years later Steptow and Marmot found that participants who scored high in positive emotion continued to have lower levels of cortisol and fibrinogen, as well as a lower heart rate.[citation needed]

In Happy People Live Longer (2011),[92] Bruno Frey reported that happy people live 14% longer, increasing longevity 7.5 to 10 years and Richard Davidson's bestseller (2012) The Emotional Life of Your Brain argues that positive emotion and happiness benefit long-term health.[citation needed]

However, in 2015 a study building on earlier research found that happiness has no effect on mortality.[93] "This "basic belief that if you're happier you're going to live longer. That's just not true."[94] Consistent results are that "apart from good health, happy people were more likely to be older, not smoke, have fewer educational qualifications, do strenuous exercise, live with a partner, do religious or group activities and sleep for eight hours a night."[94]

Happiness does however seem to have a protective impact on immunity. The tendency to experience positive emotions was associated with greater resistance to colds and flu in interventional studies irrespective of other factors such as smoking, drinking, exercise, and sleep.[95][96]

Despite a large body of positive psychological research into the relationship between happiness and productivity,[97][98][99] happiness at work has traditionally been seen as a potential by-product of positive outcomes at work, rather than a pathway to success in business. However a growing number of scholars, including Boehm and Lyubomirsky, argue that it should be viewed as one of the major sources of positive outcomes in the workplace.[75][100]

Continue reading here:
Happiness - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read More...

What Happens When We All Live to 100? – The Atlantic

Saturday, September 24th, 2016

For millennia, if not for eonsanthropology continuously pushes backward the time of human originlife expectancy was short. The few people who grew old were assumed, because of their years, to have won the favor of the gods. The typical person was fortunate to reach 40.

Beginning in the 19th century, that slowly changed. Since 1840, life expectancy at birth has risen about three months with each passing year. In 1840, life expectancy at birth in Sweden, a much-studied nation owing to its record-keeping, was 45 years for women; today its 83 years. The United States displays roughly the same trend. When the 20th century began, life expectancy at birth in America was 47 years; now newborns are expected to live 79 years. If about three months continue to be added with each passing year, by the middle of this century, American life expectancy at birth will be 88 years. By the end of the century, it will be 100 years.

Viewed globally, the lengthening of life spans seems independent of any single, specific event. It didnt accelerate much as antibiotics and vaccines became common. Nor did it retreat much during wars or disease outbreaks. A graph of global life expectancy over time looks like an escalator rising smoothly. The trend holds, in most years, in individual nations rich and poor; the whole world is riding the escalator.

Projections of ever-longer life spans assume no incredible medical discoveriesrather, that the escalator ride simply continues. If anti-aging drugs or genetic therapies are found, the climb could accelerate. Centenarians may become the norm, rather than rarities who generate a headline in the local newspaper.

Pie in the sky? On a verdant hillside in Marin County, Californiahome to hipsters and towering redwoods, the place to which the Golden Gate Bridge leadssits the Buck Institute, the first private, independent research facility dedicated to extending the human life span. Since 1999, scientists and postdocs there have studied ways to make organisms live much longer, and with better health, than they naturally would. Already, the institutes researchers have quintupled the life span of laboratory worms. Most Americans have never heard of the Buck Institute, but someday this place may be very well known.

Buck is not alone in its pursuit. The University of Michigan, the University of Texas, and the University of California at San Francisco are studying ways to slow aging, as is the Mayo Clinic. Late in 2013, Google brought its trove of cash into the game, founding a spin-off called the California Life Company (known as Calico) to specialize in longevity research. Six months after Calicos charter was announced, Craig Venter, the biotech entrepreneur who in the 1990s conducted a dramatic race against government laboratories to sequence the human genome, also founded a start-up that seeks ways to slow aging.

Should research find a life-span breakthrough, the proportion of the U.S. population that is elderlyfated to rise anyway, considering declining fertility rates, the retirement of the Baby Boomers, and the continuing uplift of the escalatormay climb even more. Longer life has obvious appeal, but it entails societal risks. Politics may come to be dominated by the old, who might vote themselves ever more generous benefits for which the young must pay. Social Security and private pensions could be burdened well beyond what current actuarial tables suggest. If longer life expectancy simply leads to more years in which pensioners are disabled and demand expensive services, health-care costs may balloon as never before, while other social needs go unmet.

With each passing year, the newly born live about three months longer than those born the prior year.

But the story might have a happy ending. If medical interventions to slow aging result in added years of reasonable fitness, life might extend in a sanguine manner, with most men and women living longer in good vigor, and also working longer, keeping pension and health-care subsidies under control. Indeed, the most-exciting work being done in longevity science concerns making the later years vibrant, as opposed to simply adding time at the end.

Postwar medical research has focused on specific conditions: there are heart-disease laboratories, cancer institutes, and so on. Traditional research assumes the chronic later-life diseases that are among the nations leading killerscardiovascular blockage, stroke, Alzheimersarise individually and should be treated individually. What if, instead, aging is the root cause of many chronic diseases, and aging can be slowed? Not just life span but health span might increase.

Drugs that lengthen health span are becoming to medical researchers what vaccines and antibiotics were to previous generations in the lab: their grail. If health-span research is successful, pharmaceuticals as remarkable as those earlier generations of drugs may result. In the process, society might learn the answer to an ancient mystery: Given that every cell in a mammals body contains the DNA blueprint of a healthy young version of itself, why do we age at all?

Here in our freezers we have 100 or so compounds that extend life in invertebrates, says Gordon Lithgow, a geneticist at the Buck Institute. He walks with me through labs situated on a campus of modernistic buildings that command a dreamlike view of San Pablo Bay, and encourage dreamlike thoughts. The 100 compounds in the freezer? What we dont know is if they work in people.

The Buck Institute bustles with young researchers. Jeans and San Francisco 49ers caps are common sightsthis could be a Silicon Valley software start-up were not microscopes, cages, and biological-isolation chambers ubiquitous. The institute is named for Leonard and Beryl Buck, a Marin County couple who left oil stocks to a foundation charged with studying why people age, among other issues. When the institute opened, medical research aimed at slowing aging was viewed as quixoticthe sort of thing washed-up hippies talk about while sipping wine and watching the sunset. A mere 15 years into its existence, the Buck Institute is at the bow wave of biology.

In one lab, researchers laboriously tamper with yeast chromosomes. Yeast is expedient as a research subject because it lives out a lifetime before an analysts eyes, and because a third of yeast genes are similar to human genes. Deleting some genes kills yeast; deleting others causes yeast to live longer. Why deleting some genes extends life isnt knownBuck researchers are trying to figure this out, in the hope that they might then carry the effect over to mammals. The work is painstaking, with four microscopes in use at least 50 hours a week.

Buck employs Lilliputian electrocardiogram machines and toy-size CT scanners to examine the internal organs of mice, since the goal is not just to make them live longer but to keep them healthy longer, with less cancer or heart disease. Researchers curious about aging mainly work with mice, worms, flies, and yeast, because they are small and easily housed, and because they dont live long, so improvements to life expectancy are quickly observable. Twenty years ago it was a really big deal to extend the life span of worms. Now any postdoc can do that, says Simon Melov, a Buck geneticist. Experiments funded by the National Institute on Aging have shown that drugs can extend a mouses life span by about a quarter, and Buck researchers have been able to reverse age-related heart dysfunction in the same animal. Think how the world would be upended if human longevity quickly jumped another 25 percent.

The rubber will meet the road with human trials. We hope to find five to 10 small molecules that extend healthy life span in mice, then stage a human trial, says Brian Kennedy, the Buck Institutes CEO. A drug called rapamycinbeing tested at the institute and elsewhereseems closest to trial stage and has revolutionary potential. But in addition to being ethically fraught, human trials of a life-extension substance will be costly, and might take decades. The entry of Googles billions into the field makes human trials more likely. Calico is tight-lipped about its plansthe company agreed to let me visit, then backed out.

Anti-aging research is not without antecedents, some of which offer notes of caution. A generation ago, Linus Pauling, a winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry, proposed that megadoses of vitamin C would retard aging. It turned out that at megadoses, vitamins can become toxic. If you take vitamins, swallow the amounts recommended by the Food and Drug Administration.

A decade ago, a biotech start-up called Sirtris sought to devise drugs that mimic the supposed health-giving properties of red wine. GlaxoSmithKline bought Sirtris for $790 million in todays dollars, money the company may wish it had back: Sirtris experiments have yet to lead to any practical product.

About 15 years ago, Bruce Ames, an accomplished scientist at the University of California at Berkeley, proposed that acetylcarnitine, which regulates the mitochondria of cells, combined with an antioxidant, might retard aging while treating mild Alzheimers. Antioxidant has become a buzzword of supplement marketing and Dr. Ozstyle quackery. Too much antioxidant would be unhealthy, since oxidation is essential to the bodys respiration. Ames thought he had found a compound that safely moderates the pace at which cells use themselves up. He began dosing himself with acetylcarnitine, and continues to work at Berkeley, at age 85; whether he would have enjoyed such longevity anyway is unknowable. Pharmaceutical companies have shown little interest in Amess ideabecause it occurs naturally, acetylcarnitine cannot be patented, and, worse from Big Pharmas standpoint, the substance is inexpensive.

Today, lab results show a clear relationship between a restricted-calorie diet and longevity in mice. That eating less extends the life spans of small mammals is the strongest finding of anti-aging research to this point. A restrictive diet seems to put mouse cells into a state vaguely similar to hibernation; whether caloric restriction would work in people isnt known. A campaign against calories might seem to possess broad practical appeal, since whats recommendedeating lesscosts nothing. But if the mice are any indication, one would need to eat a lot less, dropping caloric intake to the level at which a person feels hunger pangs throughout the day. Caloric restriction is a fad diet in Northern California, Melov told me. We had a caloric-restriction group come in to visit the institute. They did not look at all healthy.

Recently, separate teams at Harvard, Stanford, and UC San Francisco reported that transferring the blood of adolescent mice into old, declining mice had a rejuvenating effect on the latter. The thought of the old rich purchasing blood from the young poor is ghoulish on numerous levels. The research goal is to determine what chemical aspect of youthful blood benefits mature tissue. Perhaps compounds in adolescent blood excite dormant stem cells, and a drug could be developed that triggers the effect without transfusion.

The Buck Institute and other labs have been looking for health-span DNA that may exist in other mammals. Whales are a lot less likely than people are to get cancer. Polar bears consume an extremely high-fat diet yet dont develop arterial plaque. If the biological pathways for such qualities were understood, a drug might be designed to trigger the effect in people. Mimicking what nature has already developed seems more promising than trying to devise novel DNA.

In worms, genes called daf-2 and daf-16 can change in a way that causes the invertebrates to live twice as long as is natural, and in good vigor. A molecular biologist named Cynthia Kenyon, among the first hires at Calico, made that discovery more than two decades ago, when she was a researcher at UC San Francisco. By manipulating the same genes in mice, Kenyon has been able to cause them to live longer, with less cancer than mice in a control group: that is, with a better health span. The daf-16 gene is similar to a human gene called foxo3, a variant of which is linked to exceptional longevity. A drug that mimics this foxo3 variant is rumored to be among Calicos initial projects.

A long time has passed since Kenyons eureka moment about worm genes, and shes still far from proving that this insight can help people. But the tempo of the kind of work she does is accelerating. Twenty years ago, genetic sequencing and similar forms of DNA research were excruciatingly time-consuming. New techniques and equipment have altered that: for instance, one Silicon Valley lab-services firm, Sequetech, advertises, Go from [cell] colony to sequence in a day. The accelerating pace of genetic-information gathering may come in handy for health-span research.

The Buck Institute became cautiously optimistic about rapamycin when its life-extension properties were noticed in yeast. Lab mice dosed with rapamycin are dying off more slowly than they would naturally, and many of the old mice appear energetic and youthful. Devised to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, rapamycin seems to alter some chemistry associated with cellular senescence. (More on that later.) If the drug turns out to delay aging in people, it would be the greatest off-label pharmaceutical use ever. But dont ask your doctor for a prescriptionhealth-span therapy based on rapamycin is years away, if it ever happens. Kennedy, the Buck Institute CEO, does not dose himself with rapamycin, whose side effects are not understood.

Researchers at the Buck Institute are lean: societys obesity problems are not in evidence there. Everyone takes the stairs; elevators are viewed as strictly for visitors. If there is a candy machine on the 488-acre grounds, it is well hidden. I met some researchers for lunch in a glass-and-chrome conference room (Bucks buildings were designed by I. M. Pei and fairly shout Give me an architecture award!). Lunch was an ascetic affair: water and a small sandwich with greens; no sides, soda, or cookies. Kennedy says he seldom eats lunch, and runs up to 20 miles weekly. Yet, even doing everything right by the lights of current assumptions about how to stave off aging, at age 47, Kennedy has wrinkle lines around his eyes.

Except with regard to infectious diseases, medical cause and effect is notoriously hard to pin down. Coffee, salt, butter: good, bad, or neither? Studies are inconclusive. Why do some people develop heart disease while others with the same habits dont? The Framingham Heart Study, in its 66th year and following a third generation of subjects, still struggles with such questions. You should watch your weight, eat more greens and less sugar, exercise regularly, and get ample sleep. But you should do these things because they are common sensenot because there is any definitive proof that they will help you live longer.

The uncertainty inherent in the practice of medicine is amplified when the subject is longevity, because decades might pass before anyone knows whether a particular drug or lifestyle modification does any good. Scrutinizing the very old has not been the gold mine some researchers hoped it would be. Lifestyle studies of centenarians can be really puzzling, Kennedy says. They smoke more and drink less than we might guess. Few are vegetarians. Nothing jumps out as a definitive cause of their long lives.

Among the first wide-scale efforts to understand gerontology was the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, begun by federal researchers in 1958 and ongoing. Its current director, Luigi Ferrucci, says, The study has determined that disabilities among the elderly often have warning signs that can be detected in youth, and this insight might lead to early-life interventions that decrease late-life chronic disease. But on some of the big questions, such as whether longevity is caused mainly by genes or mainly by lifestyle and environment, we just have no idea at all.

Studies of twins suggest that about 30 percent of longevity is inherited. This is one of the factors that make researchers optimisticif 30 percent of longevity is inherited, perhaps laboratories can design a compound that causes anyones blood chemistry to mimic what happens in the bodies of those who were born with the DNA for long life. But when we sequence the genome, only 1 percent seems linked to longevity, Ferrucci told me. The other 99 percent of the presumed genetic effect is unexplained.

At medical conferences, Ferrucci likes to show physicians and researchers an elaborate medical profile of an anonymous patient, then ask them to guess her age. Guesses are off by as much as 20 years too high or low, he says. This is because medically, we do not know what age is. The sole means to determine age is by asking for date of birth. Thats what a basic level this research still is at.

Aging brings with it, of course, senescence. Cellular senescence, a subset of the overall phenomenon, is a subject of fascination in longevity research.

The tissues and organs that make up our bodies are prone to injury, and the cells are prone to malfunctions, cancer being the most prominent. When an injury must be healed, or cancerous tissue that is dividing must be stopped, nearby cells transmit chemical signals that trigger the repair of injured cells or the death of malignant ones. (Obviously this is a simplification.) In the young, the system works pretty well. But as cells turn senescent, they begin to send out false positives. The bodys healing ability falters as excess production of the repair signal leads to persistent inflammation, which is the foundation of heart disease, Alzheimers, arthritis, and other chronic maladies associated with the passage of time. Cars wear out because they cannot repair themselves; our bodies wear out because they lose the ability to repair themselves. If the loss of our ability to self-repair were slowed down, health during our later years would improve: a longer warranty, in the auto analogy.

If we can figure out how to eliminate senescent cells or switch off their secretions, says Judith Campisi, who runs the Buck Institutes research on this topic, then we could prevent or lessen the impact of many chronic diseases of aging. Its not a coincidence that incidence of these chronic diseases increases sharply after the age of 50, a time when senescent cells also increase in number. If you believe, as many scientists do, that aging is a prime cause of many chronic diseases, it is essential that we understand the accumulation of senescent cells. Rapamycin excites longevity researchers because it seems to switch off the repair signal mistakenly sent by senescent cells. Mayo Clinic researchers are studying other substances that dampen the effects of cellular senescence; some have proved to keep mice fit longer than normal, extending their health span. Many elderly people decline into years of progressive disability, then become invalids. If instead most people enjoyed reasonable vigor right up to the end, that would be just as exciting for society as adding years to life expectancy.

Big medical efforts tend to be structured as assaults on specific conditionsthe war on cancer and so on. One reason is psychological: a wealthy person who survived a heart attack, or lost a parent to one, endows a foundation to study the problem. Another reason is symbolic: we tend to view diseases as challenges thrown at us by nature, to be overcome one by one. If the passage of time itself turns out to be the challenge, interdisciplinary study of aging might overtake the disease-by-disease approach. As recently as a generation ago, it would have seemed totally crazy to suppose that aging could be cured. Now curing aging seems, well, only somewhat crazy.

The life-expectancy escalator has for nearly two centuries risen about three months a year, despite two world wars, the 1918 influenza pandemic, the AIDS epidemic, and the global populations growing sevenfoldthe latter deceptively important, because crowded conditions are assumed to more readily communicate disease. Will life-span increases continue regardless of what may happen in biotech? The yea position is represented by James Vaupel, the founder of Germanys Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research; the nay by Jay Olshansky, a professor of public health at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

In 2002, Vaupel published an influential article in Science documenting the eerily linear rise in life expectancy since 1840. Controversially, Vaupel concluded that reductions in mortality should not be seen as a disconnected sequence of unrepeatable revolutions but rather as a regular stream of continuing progress. No specific development or discovery has caused the rise: improvements in nutrition, public health, sanitation, and medical knowledge all have helped, but the operative impetus has been the stream of continuing progress.

Vaupel called it a reasonable scenario that increases will continue at least until life expectancy at birth surpasses 100. His views havent changed. The data still support the conclusions of the 2002 paper. Linear rise in life expectancy has continued, Vaupel told me earlier this year. In a recent report, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that the age-adjusted U.S. death rate declined to a record low in 2011. Today the first four causes of death in the United States are chronic, age-related conditions: heart disease, cancer, chronic lower-respiratory diseases, and stroke. As long as living standards continue to improve, Vaupel thinks, life expectancy will continue to increase.

On the opposite side of this coin, Olshansky told me the rise in life expectancy will hit a wall soon, if it hasnt already. He noted, Most of the 20th-century gains in longevity came from reduced infant mortality, and those were onetime gains. Infant mortality in the United States trails some other nations, but has dropped so muchdown to one in 170that little room for improvement remains. Theres tremendous statistical impact on life expectancy when the young are saved, Olshansky says. A reduction in infant mortality saves the entire span of a persons life. Avoiding mortality in a young personsay, by vaccinesaves most of the persons life. Changes in medicine or lifestyle that extend the lives of the old dont add much to the numbers. Olshansky calculates that if cancer were eliminated, American life expectancy would rise by only three years, because a host of other chronic fatal diseases are waiting to take its place. He thinks the 21st century will see the average life span extend another 10 years or so, with a bonus of more health span. Then the increase will slow noticeably, or stop.

Whether human age may have a biological limit does not factor into this debate. A French woman who lived from 1875 to 1997, Jeanne Calment, had the longest confirmed life span, at 122. Shes obviously an outlier, and while outliers dont tell us much, they do hint at whats possible. Her age at death was well beyond the average life span that either Vaupel or Olshansky are contemplating in their analyses. And in any case, various experts, at various times across the past century, have argued that life span was nearing a ceiling, only to be proved wrong.

Diminishing smoking and drunk driving have obviously contributed to declining mortality. Homicide has fallen so muchshootings arent necessarily down, but improved trauma response saves more victimsthat murder is no longer among the top 15 causes of death in the United States. Other health indicators seem positive as well. All forms of harmful air and water emissions except greenhouse gases are in long-term decline. Less smog, acid rain, and airborne soot foster longevitythe old are sensitive to respiratory diseasewhile declining levels of industrial toxins may contribute to declining cancer rates. Life expectancy can be as much as 18 years shorter in low-income U.S. counties than in high-income counties, but Obamacare should correct some of that imbalance: Romneycare, enacted in 2006 and in many ways Obamacares precursor, reduced mortality in low-income Massachusetts counties. These and many other elements of Vaupels stream of continuing progress seem to favor longevity. So does climate change: people live longer in warm climates than cold, and the world is warming.

Popular attention tends to focus on whether what we gulp down determines how long we live: Should people take fish oil and shop for organic probiotic kefir? The way our homes, families, and friendships are organized may matter just as much. Thomas Perls, a professor at Boston Medical Center who analyzes the genomes of centenarians, notes that Seventh-Day Adventists enjoy about a decade more life expectancy than peers of their birth years: They dont drink or smoke, most are vegetarians, they exercise regularly even when old, and take a true weekly day of rest. But what really strikes Perls about Seventh-Day Adventists is that they maintain large social groups. Constant interaction with other people can be annoying, but overall seems to keep us engaged with life.

For years, the American social trend has been away from constant interaction with other peoplefewer two-parent homes, fewer children per home, declining participation in religious and community activities, grandparents living on their own, electronic interaction replacing the face-to-face in everything from work to dating. Prosperity is associated with smaller households, yet the large multigeneration home may be best for long life. There are some indications that the Great Recession increased multigeneration living. This may turn out to boost longevity, at least for a time.

The single best yardstick for measuring a persons likely life span is education. John Rowe, a health-policy professor at Columbia University and a former CEO of Aetna, says, If someone walked into my office and asked me to predict how long he would live, I would ask two things: What is your age, and how many years of education did you receive?

Jay Olshanskys latest research suggests that American women with no high-school diploma have experienced relatively small life-span increases since the 1950s, while the life expectancy of highly educated women has soared since then. Today the best-educated Americans live 10 to 14 years longer than the least educated, on average. Nothing pops out of the data like the link between education and life expectancy, Olshansky says. The good news is that the share of the American population that is less educated is in gradual decline. The bad news is that lack of education seems even more lethal than it was in the past.

Education does not sync with life expectancy because reading Dostoyevsky lowers blood pressure; college is a proxy for other aspects of a persons life. Compared with the less educated, people with a bachelors degree have a higher income, smoke less, are less likely to be overweight, and are more likely to follow doctors instructions. College graduates are more likely to marry and stay married, and marriage is good for your health: the wedded suffer fewer heart attacks and strokes than the single or divorced.

Many of the social developments that improve longevitybetter sanitation, less pollution, improved emergency roomsare provided to all on an egalitarian basis. But todays public high schools are dreadful in many inner-city areas, and broadly across states including California. Legislatures are cutting support for public universities, while the cost of higher education rises faster than inflation. These issues are discussed in terms of fairness; perhaps health should be added as a concern in the debate. If education is the trump card of longevity, the top quintile may pull away from the rest.

Society is dominated by the oldold political leaders, old judges. With each passing year, as longevity increases, the intergenerational imbalance worsens. The old demand benefits for which the young must pay, while people in their 20s become disenchanted, feeling that the deck is stacked against them. National debt increases at an alarming rate. Innovation and fresh thinking disappear as energies are devoted to defending current pie-slicing arrangements.

This isnt a prediction about the future of the United States, but rather a description of Japan right now. The Land of the Rising Sun is the worlds grayest nation. Already the median age is 45 (in the U.S., by comparison, it is 37), and it will jump to 55 by 2040. As Nicholas Eberstadt, a demographer at the American Enterprise Institute, has noted, median age in the retirement haven of Palm Springs, California, is currently 52 years. Japan is on its way to becoming an entire nation of Palm Springs residents.

The number of Americans 65 or older could reach 108 million in 2050. Thats like adding three more Floridas, inhabited entirely by seniors.

Japans grayness stems from a very low fertility ratenot enough babies to bring down the average ageand strict barriers against immigration. The United States remains a nation of immigrants, and because of the continual inflow of young people, the U.S. median age wont go haywire even as life expectancy rises: the United Nations World Population Prospects estimates that the U.S. median age will rise to 41 by mid-century.

Nonetheless, that Japan is the first major nation to turn gray, and is also the deepest in debt, is not encouraging. Once, Japan was feared as the Godzilla of global trade, but as it grayed, its economy entered a long cycle of soft growth. In 2012 the centrist Democratic Party of Japan, then holding the Diet, backed a tax whose goal was not to pay down what the country owes but merely to slow the rate of borrowing. The party promptly got the heave-ho from voters. Last year Japans public debt hit $10 trillion, twice the nations GDP.

Sheila Smith, a Japan specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations, told me, Young people in Japan have some of the worlds worst voter-participation rates. They think the old have the system so rigged in their favor, theres no point in political activity. The young dont seem excited by the future. News accounts of young Japanese becoming so apathetic that theyve lost interest in having sex sound hard to believe, but may bear some truth.

Young urban Japanese surely are aware that their elders are ringing up bills to be handed to them, but theyre also aware that if funding for the retired is cut, Grandma may want to move into their very small apartment. As life expectancy rises, a Japanese person entering the happy-go-lucky phase of early adulthood may find that parents and grandparents both expect to be looked after. Because the only child is common in Japans newest generation, a big cast of aging people may turn to one young person for financial support or caregiving or both. Acceding to public borrowing may have become, to young Japanese, a way to keep older generations out of the apartmenteven if it means crushing national debt down the road.

That America may become more like Japansteadily older, with rising debt and declining economic growthis unsettling. From the second half of the George W. Bush administration until 2013, U.S. national debt more than doubled. The federal government borrowed like there was no tomorrow. The debt binge, for which leaders of both political parties bear blame, was a prelude to the retirement of the Baby Boomers. Tomorrow has a way of coming.

Suppose the escalator slows, and conservative assumptions about life expectancy prevail. In a 2009 study, Olshansky projected future demographics under the hit a wall scenario. The number of Americans 65 or older, 43 million today, could reach 108 million in 2050that would be like adding three more Floridas, inhabited entirely by seniors. The oldest old cohort, those 85 and older, may increase at least fivefold, to more than 6 percent of the U.S. citizenry. Olshansky projected that by 2050, life expectancy will extend three to eight years past the age used by the Social Security Administration to assess the solvency of its system, while forecasting that by 2050, Medicare and Social Security will rack up between $3.2 trillion and $8.3 trillion in unfunded obligations. (State and local governments have at least another $1 trillion in unfunded pension liabilities.) These disconcerting numbers flow from the leading analyst who thinks that the life-span increase is slowing down.

When President Obama took office, Social Securitys trustees said the current benefits structure was funded until 2037. Now the Congressional Budget Office says the year of reckoning may come as soon as 2031. States may be funding their pension obligations using fuzzy math: New York issues promissory notes; Illinois and New Jersey sell debt instruments distressingly similar to junk bonds. Many private pension plans are underfunded, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, which on paper appears to insure them, is an accident looking for a place to happen. Twice in the past three years, Congress has voted to allow corporations to delay contributions to pension plans. This causes them to pay more taxes in the present year, giving Congress more to spend, while amplifying problems down the road. Social Securitys disability fund may fail as soon as late 2016. Medicare spending is rising faster than Social Security spending, and is harder to predict. Projections show the main component of Medicare, its hospital fund, failing by 2030.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that over the next decade, all federal spending growth will come from entitlementsmainly Social Security and Medicareand from interest on the national debt. The nonpartisan think tank Third Way has calculated that at the beginning of the Kennedy presidency, the federal government spent $2.50 on public investmentsinfrastructure, education, and researchfor every $1 it spent on entitlements. By 2022, Third Way predicts, the government will spend $5 on entitlements for every $1 on public investments. Infrastructure, education, and research lead to economic growth; entitlement subsidies merely allow the nation to tread water.

If health span can be improved, the costs of aging-related disability may be manageable. Not that long ago, vast sums were spent on iron lungs and sanitariums for treatment of polio: preventing the disease has proved much less expensive than treating it. If chronic ailments related to aging can be prevented or significantly delayed, big-ticket line items in Medicare might not go off the rails.

But if health span does not improve, longer life could make disability in aging an economic crisis. Today, Medicare and Medicaid spend about $150 billion annually on Alzheimers patients. Absent progress against aging, the number of people with Alzheimers could treble by 2050, with society paying as much for Alzheimers care as for the current defense budget.

Many disabilities associated with advanced years cannot be addressed with pharmaceuticals or high-tech procedures; caregivers are required. Providing personal care for an aged invalid is a task few wish to undertake. Already many lists of careers with the most job openings are headed by caregiver or nurses aide, professions in which turnover is high.

As longevity increases, so too does the number of living grandparents. Families that once might have had one oldest old relative find themselves with three or four, all expecting care or money. At the same time, traditional family trees are being replaced with diagrams that resemble maps of the London Underground. Will children of blended families feel the same obligation to care for aging stepparents as they feel for biological parents? Just the entry of the phrase birth parent into the national lexicon suggests the magnitude of the change.

With Japan at the leading edge of lengthening life expectancy, its interest in robotics can be eerie. Foxconn, the Asian electronics giant, is manufacturing for the Japanese market a creepy mechanized thing named Pepper that is intended to provide company for the elderly. More-sophisticated devices may be in store. A future in which large numbers of very old, incapacitated people stare into the distance as robot attendants click and hum would be a bad science-fiction movie if it didnt stand a serious chance of happening.

As the population ages, so do the political powers that beand theyre aging in place. Computerized block-by-block voting analysis and shameless gerrymanderingMarylands new sixth congressional district is such a strange shape, it would have embarrassed Elbridge Gerrylock incumbents into power as never before. Campaign-finance laws appear to promote reform, but in fact have been rigged to discourage challengers. Between rising life expectancy and the mounting power of incumbency, both houses of Congress are the oldest theyve ever been: the average senator is 62 years old; the average representative, 57.

A graying Congress would be expected to be concerned foremost with protection of the status quo. Government may grow sclerotic at the very time the aging of the populace demands new ideas. Theres already a tremendous advantage to incumbency, one experienced political operative told me. As people live longer, incumbents will become more entrenched. Strom Thurmond might not be unusual anymore. Many from both parties could cling to power too long, freezing out fresh thinking. It wont be good for democracy. The speaker was no starry-eyed radical: he was Karl Rove.

Now think of the Supreme Court as life expectancy increases. The nine justices on the first Court sat an average of nine years; the last nine to depart, an average of 27 years. John Paul Stevens, the most recent to retire, was a justice for 35 years. If Clarence Thomas lives to the actuarial life expectancy of a male his current age, he could be a Supreme Court justice for 40 years.

The Framers would be aghast at the idea of a small cadre of unelected potentates lording it over the body politic for decades. When the Constitution was written, no one could have anticipated how much life span would increase, nor how much power the Supreme Court would accrue. If democracy is to remain vibrant as society ages, campaign laws must change to help challengers stand a chance versus incumbents, and the Constitution must be amended to impose a term limit on the Supreme Court, so confirmation as a justice stops being a lifetime appointment to royalty.

In 1940, the typical American who reached age 65 would ultimately spend about 17 percent of his or her life retired. Now the figure is 22 percent, and still rising. Yet Social Security remains structured as if longevity were stuck in a previous century. The early-retirement option, added by Congress in 1961start drawing at age 62, though with lower benefitsis appealing if life is short, but backfires as life span extends. People who opt for early Social Security may reach their 80s having burned through savings, and face years of living on a small amount rather than the full benefit they might have received. Polls show that Americans consistently underestimate how long they will livea convenient assumption that justifies retiring early and spending now, while causing dependency over the long run.

James Vaupel has warned that refusing to acknowledge longevitys steady march distorts peoples decisions about how much to save and when to retire and gives license to politicians to postpone painful adjustments to Social Security. Ronald Reagan was the last president to push through legislation to account for life-span changes. His administration increased the future eligible age of full Social Security benefits from 65 to 66 or 67, depending on ones birth year. Perhaps 99 percent of members of Congress would agree in private that retirement economics must change; none will touch this third rail. Generating more Social Security revenue by lifting the payroll-tax cap, currently $117,000, is the sole politically attractive option, because only the well-to-do would be impacted. But the Congressional Budget Office recently concluded that even this soak-the-rich option is insufficient to prevent insolvency for Social Security. At least one other change, such as later retirement or revised cost-of-living formulas, is required. A fair guess is that the government will do nothing about Social Security reform until a crisis strikesand then make panicked, ill-considered moves that foresight might have avoided.

Americans may decry government gridlock, but they cant blame anyone else for their own decisions. Peoples retirement savings simply must increase, though this means financial self-discipline, which Americans are not known for. Beyond that, most individuals will likely need to take a new view of what retirement should be: not a toggle switchno work at all, after years of full-time laborbut a continuum on which a person gradually downshifts to half-time, then to working now and then. Lets call it the retirement track rather than retirement: a phase of continuing to earn and save as full-time work winds down.

Widespread adoption of a retirement track would necessitate changes in public policy and in employers attitudes. Banks dont think in terms of smallish loans to help a person in the second half of life start a home-based business, but such lending might be vital to a graying population. Many employers are required to continue offering health insurance to those who stay on the job past 65, even though they are eligible for Medicare. Employers premiums for these workers are much higher than for young workers, which means employers may have a logical reason to want anyone past 65 off the payroll. Ending this requirement would make seniors more attractive to employers.

Many people may find continuing to work but under the lower-stress circumstances of part-time employment to be preferable to a gold watch, then idleness. Gradual downshifting could help ease aging people into volunteer service roles, where theres never any end of things to do. The retirement track could be more appealing than traditional retirement. A longer health span will be essential to making it possible.

Understanding the evolutionary biology of aging might help the quest for improved health span. Each cell of the body contains DNA code for a fresh, healthy cell, yet that blueprint is not called on as we grow old. Evolutionists including Alfred Russel Wallace have toyed with the idea of programmed deaththe notion that natural selection wants old animals to die in order to free up resources for younger animals, which may carry evolved genetic structures. Current thinking tends to hold that rather than trying to make older animals die, natural selection simply has no mechanism to reward longevity.

Felipe Sierra, a researcher at the National Institute on Aging, says, Evolution doesnt care about you past your reproductive age. It doesnt want you either to live longer or to die, it just doesnt care. From the standpoint of natural selection, an animal that has finished reproducing and performed the initial stage of raising young might as well be eaten by something, since any favorable genetic quality that expresses later in life cannot be passed along. Because a mutation that favors long life cannot make an animal more likely to succeed at reproducing, selection pressure works only on the young.

A generation ago, theorists suspected that menopause was an evolutionary adaptation exclusive to the Homo genuswomen stop expending energy to bear children so they can care longer for those already born, as mothers and grandmothers. This, the theory goes, increases childrens chances of survival, allowing them to pass along family genes. Yet recent research has shown that animals including lions and baboons also go through menopause, which increasingly looks more like a malfunction of aging cells than a quality brought about by selection pressure. As for the idea that grandparents help their grandchildren prosper, favoring longevitythe grandmother effectthis notion, too, has fared poorly in research.

The key point is: if nothing that happens after a person reproduces bears on which genes flourish, then nature has never selected for qualities that extend longevity. Evolution favors strength, intelligence, reflexes, sexual appeal; it does not favor keeping an organism running a long time. For example, a growing body needs calcium, so nature selected for the ability to metabolize this element. In later life, calcium causes stiffening of the arteries, a problem that evolution has no mechanism to correct, since hardened arteries do not occur until its too late for natural selection to side with any beneficial mutation. Testosterone is essential to a youthful man; in an aging man, it can be a factor in prostate cancer. Evolution never selected for a defense against that.

Similar examples abound; the most important may be senescent cells. Natural selection probably favors traits that reduce the risk of cancer, because cancer can strike the young before reproductive age is reached. Senescence doesnt occur until evolution is no longer in play, so natural selection has left all mammal bodies with a defect that leads to aging and death.

If senescence could be slowed, men and women hardly would become immortal. Violence, accidents, and contagious disease still would kill. Even if freed of chronic conditions, eventually our bodies would fail.

But it is not credulous futurism to suppose that drugs or even genetic therapy may alter the human body in ways that extend longevity. Brian Kennedy, of the Buck Institute, notes, Because natural selection did not improve us for aging, theres a chance for rapid gains. The latest BMWs are close to perfect. How can an engineer improve on them? But the Model T would be easy to improve on now. When young, genetically we are BMWs. In aging, we become Model Ts. The evolutionary improvements havent started yet.

In the wild, young animals outnumber the old; humanity is moving toward a society where the elderly outnumber the recently arrived. Such a world will differ from todays in many outward aspects. Warm-weather locations are likely to grow even more popular, though with climate change, warm-weather locations may come to include Buffalo, New York. Ratings for football, which is loud and aggressive, may wane, while baseball and theatergoing enjoy a renaissance. The shift back toward cities, initiated by the educated young, may give way to another car-centric suburban and exurban growth phase.

The university, a significant aspect of the contemporary economy, centuries ago was a place where the fresh-faced would be prepared for a short life; today the university is a place where adults watch children and grandchildren walk to Pomp and Circumstance. The university of the future may be one that serves all ages. Colleges will reposition themselves economically as offering just as much to the aging as to the adolescent: courses priced individually for later-life knowledge seekers; lots of campus events of interest to students, parents, and the community as a whole; a pleasant college-town atmosphere to retire near. In decades to come, college professors may address students ranging from age 18 to 80.

Products marketed to senior citizens are already a major presence on television, especially during newscasts and weathercasts. Advertising pitched to the elderly may come to dominate the airwaves, assuming there still is television. But consumerism might decline. Neurological studies of healthy aging people show that the parts of the brain associated with reward-seeking light up less as time goes on. Whether its hot new fashions or hot-fudge sundaes, older people on the whole dont desire acquisitions as much as the young and middle-aged do. Denounced for generations by writers and clergy, wretched excess has repelled all assaults. Longer life spans may at last be the counterweight to materialism.

If health span extends, the nuclear family might be seen as less central. Bearing and raising children would no longer be the all-consuming life event.

Deeper changes may be in store as well. People in their late teens to late 20s are far more likely to commit crimes than people of other ages; as society grays, the decline of crime should continue. Violence in all guises should continue downward, too. Horrible headlines from Afghanistan or Syria are exceptions to an overall trend toward less warfare and less low-intensity conflict. As Steven Pinker showed in the 2011 book Better Angels of Our Nature, total casualties of combat, including indirect casualties from the economic harm associated with fighting, have been declining, even as the global population has risen. In 1950, one person in 5,000 worldwide died owing to combat; by 2010, this measure was down to one person in 300,000. In recent years, far more people have been killed by car crashes than by battle. Simultaneously, per capita military expenditure has shrunk. My favorite statistic about the world: the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reports that, adjusting to todays dollars, global per capita military spending has declined by one-third in the past quarter century.

The end of the Cold War, and the proxy conflicts it spawned, is an obvious influence on the subsiding of warfare, as is economic interconnectedness. But aging may also be a factor. Counterculture optics notwithstanding, polls showed that the young were more likely to support the Vietnam War than the old were; the young were more likely to support the 2003 invasion of Iraq, too. Research by John Mueller, a political scientist at Ohio State University, suggests that as people age, they become less enthusiastic about war. Perhaps this is because older people tend to be wiser than the youngand couldnt the world use more wisdom?

Older people also report, to pollsters and psychologists, a greater sense of well-being than the young and middle-aged do. By the latter phases of life, material and romantic desires have been attained or given up on; passions have cooled; and for most, a rich store of memories has been compiled. Among the core contentions of the well-being research of the Princeton University psychologist Daniel Kahneman is that in the end, memories are all you keepwhats in the mind matters more than what you own. Regardless of net worth, the old are well off in this sense.

Should large numbers of people enjoy longer lives in decent health, the overall well-being of the human family may rise substantially. In As You Like It, Jaques declares, Man in his time plays many parts, his acts being seven ages. The first five embody promise and powerinfant, schoolboy, lover, soldier, and success. The late phases are entirely negativepantaloon, a period as the butt of jokes for looking old and becoming impotent; then second childishness, a descent into senile dependency. As life expectancy and health span increase, the seven ages may demand revision, with the late phases of life seen as a positive experience of culmination and contentment.

Further along may be a rethinking of life as better structured around friendship than around family, the basic unit of human society since the mists of prehistory. In the brief life of previous centuries, all a man or woman could hope to accomplish was to bear and raise children; enervation followed. Today, life is longer, but an education-based economy requires greater investments in childrencontemporary parents are still assisting offspring well into a childs 20s. As before, when the child-rearing finally is done, decline commences.

But if health span extends, the nuclear family might be seen as less central. For most people, bearing and raising children would no longer be the all-consuming life event. After child-rearing, a phase of decades of friendships could awaitpotentially more fulfilling than the emotionally charged but fast-burning bonds of youth. A change such as this might have greater ramifications for society than changes in work schedules or health-care economics.

Regardless of where increasing life expectancy leads, the direction will be into the unknownfor society and for the natural world. Felipe Sierra, the researcher at the National Institute on Aging, puts it this way: The human ethical belief that death should be postponed as long as possible does not exist in naturefrom which we are now, in any case, diverging.

See the original post:
What Happens When We All Live to 100? - The Atlantic

Read More...

Caligula – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Friday, September 23rd, 2016

Caligula ()[1] was the popular nickname of Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (31 August AD 12 24 January AD 41), Roman emperor (AD 3741). Born Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus (not to be confused with Julius Caesar), Caligula was a member of the house of rulers conventionally known as the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Caligula's biological father was Germanicus, and he was the nephew and adopted son of Emperor Tiberius. The young Gaius earned the nickname "Caligula" (meaning "little soldier's boot", the diminutive form of caliga, hob-nailed military boot) from his father's soldiers while accompanying him during his campaigns in Germania.

When Germanicus died at Antioch in AD 19, his wife Agrippina the Elder returned with her six children to Rome, where she became entangled in a bitter feud with Tiberius. The conflict eventually led to the destruction of her family, with Caligula as the sole male survivor. Untouched by the deadly intrigues, Caligula accepted the invitation to join the Emperor in AD 31 on the island of Capri, where Tiberius had withdrawn five years earlier. With the death of Tiberius in AD 37, Caligula succeeded his grand uncle and adoptive grandfather as emperor.

There are few surviving sources about the reign of Emperor Caligula, although he is described as a noble and moderate ruler during the first six months of his reign. After this, the sources focus upon his cruelty, sadism, extravagance, and sexual perversity, presenting him as an insane tyrant. While the reliability of these sources is questionable, it is known that during his brief reign, Caligula worked to increase the unconstrained personal power of the emperor, as opposed to countervailing powers within the principate. He directed much of his attention to ambitious construction projects and luxurious dwellings for himself, and initiated the construction of two aqueducts in Rome: the Aqua Claudia and the Anio Novus. During his reign, the empire annexed the Kingdom of Mauretania as a province.

In early AD 41, Caligula was assassinated as a result of a conspiracy by officers of the Praetorian Guard, senators, and courtiers. The conspirators' attempt to use the opportunity to restore the Roman Republic was thwarted: on the day of the assassination of Caligula, the Praetorian Guard declared Caligula's uncle, Claudius, the next Roman emperor.

Gaius Julius Caesar (named in honor of his famous relative) was born in Antium (modern Anzio and Nettuno[2]) on 31 August 12 AD, the third of six surviving children born to Germanicus and his second cousin Agrippina the Elder.[3] Gaius had two older brothers, Nero and Drusus,[3] as well as three younger sisters, Agrippina the Younger, Julia Drusilla and Julia Livilla.[3] He was also a nephew of Claudius, Germanicus' younger brother and future emperor.[4]

Agrippina the Elder was the daughter of Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa and Julia the Elder.[3] She was a granddaughter of Augustus and Scribonia on her mother's side. Through Agrippina, Augustus was the maternal great-grandfather of Gaius.[3]

As a boy of just two or three, Gaius accompanied his father, Germanicus, on campaigns in the north of Germania.[5] The soldiers were amused that Gaius was dressed in a miniature soldier's outfit, including boots and armour.[5] He was soon given his nickname Caligula, meaning "little (soldier's) boot" in Latin, after the small boots he wore.[6] Gaius, though, reportedly grew to dislike this nickname.[7]

Suetonius claims that Germanicus was poisoned in Syria by an agent of Tiberius, who viewed Germanicus as a political rival.[8]

After the death of his father, Caligula lived with his mother until her relations with Tiberius deteriorated.[9] Tiberius would not allow Agrippina to remarry for fear her husband would be a rival.[10] Agrippina and Caligula's brother, Nero, were banished in 29 AD on charges of treason.[11][12]

The adolescent Caligula was then sent to live with his great-grandmother (and Tiberius's mother) Livia.[9] After her death, he was sent to live with his grandmother Antonia.[9] In 30 AD, his brother, Drusus Caesar, was imprisoned on charges of treason and his brother Nero died in exile from either starvation or suicide.[12][13] Suetonius writes that after the banishment of his mother and brothers, Caligula and his sisters were nothing more than prisoners of Tiberius under the close watch of soldiers.[14]

In 31 AD, Caligula was remanded to the personal care of Tiberius on Capri, where he lived for six years.[9] To the surprise of many, Caligula was spared by Tiberius.[15] According to historians, Caligula was an excellent natural actor and, recognizing danger, hid all his resentment towards Tiberius.[9][16] An observer said of Caligula, "Never was there a better servant or a worse master!"[9][16]

Caligula claimed to have planned to kill Tiberius with a dagger in order to avenge his mother and brother: however, having brought the weapon into Tiberius's bedroom he did not kill the Emperor but instead threw the dagger down on the floor. Supposedly Tiberius knew of this but never dared to do anything about it.[17] Suetonius claims that Caligula was already cruel and vicious: he writes that, when Tiberius brought Caligula to Capri, his purpose was to allow Caligula to live in order that he "...prove the ruin of himself and of all men, and that he was rearing a viper for the Roman people and a Phaethon for the world."[18]

In 33 AD, Tiberius gave Caligula an honorary quaestorship, a position he held until his rise to emperor.[19] Meanwhile, both Caligula's mother and his brother Drusus died in prison.[20][21] Caligula was briefly married to Junia Claudilla, in 33, though she died in childbirth the following year.[22] Caligula spent time befriending the Praetorian prefect, Naevius Sutorius Macro, an important ally.[22] Macro spoke well of Caligula to Tiberius, attempting to quell any ill will or suspicion the Emperor felt towards Caligula.[23]

In 35 AD, Caligula was named joint heir to Tiberius's estate along with Tiberius Gemellus.[24]

When Tiberius died on 16 March 37 AD, his estate and the titles of the principate were left to Caligula and Tiberius's own grandson, Gemellus, who were to serve as joint heirs. Although Tiberius was 78 and on his death bed, some ancient historians still conjecture that he was murdered.[22][25]Tacitus writes that the Praetorian Prefect, Macro, smothered Tiberius with a pillow to hasten Caligula's accession, much to the joy of the Roman people,[25] while Suetonius writes that Caligula may have carried out the killing, though this is not recorded by any other ancient historian.[22] Seneca the elder and Philo, who both wrote during Tiberius's reign, as well as Josephus record Tiberius as dying a natural death.[26] Backed by Macro, Caligula had Tiberius's will nullified with regard to Gemellus on grounds of insanity, but otherwise carried out Tiberius's wishes.[27]

Caligula accepted the powers of the principate as conferred by the senate and entered Rome on 28 March amid a crowd that hailed him as "our baby" and "our star", among other nicknames.[28] Caligula is described as the first emperor who was admired by everyone in "all the world, from the rising to the setting sun."[29] Caligula was loved by many for being the beloved son of the popular Germanicus,[28] and because he was not Tiberius.[30] Suetonius said that over 160,000 animals were sacrificed during three months of public rejoicing to usher in the new reign.[31][32] Philo describes the first seven months of Caligula's reign as completely blissful.[33]

Caligula's first acts were said to be generous in spirit, though many were political in nature.[27] To gain support, he granted bonuses to the military, including the Praetorian Guard, city troops and the army outside Italy.[27] He destroyed Tiberius's treason papers, declared that treason trials were a thing of the past, and recalled those who had been sent into exile.[34] He helped those who had been harmed by the imperial tax system, banished certain sexual deviants, and put on lavish spectacles for the public, including gladiatorial games.[35][36] Caligula collected and brought back the bones of his mother and of his brothers and deposited their remains in the tomb of Augustus.[37]

In October 37 AD, Caligula fell seriously ill, or perhaps was poisoned. He soon recovered from his illness, but many believed that the illness turned the young emperor toward the diabolical: he started to kill off or exile those who were close to him or whom he saw as a serious threat. Perhaps his illness reminded him of his mortality and of the desire of others to advance into his place.[38] He had his cousin and adopted son Tiberius Gemellus executed an act that outraged Caligula's and Gemellus's mutual grandmother Antonia Minor. She is said to have committed suicide, although Suetonius hints that Caligula actually poisoned her. He had his father-in-law Marcus Junius Silanus and his brother-in-law Marcus Lepidus executed as well. His uncle Claudius was spared only because Caligula preferred to keep him as a laughing stock. His favorite sister Julia Drusilla died in 38 AD of a fever: his other two sisters, Livilla and Agrippina the Younger, were exiled. He hated being the grandson of Agrippa and slandered Augustus by repeating a falsehood that his mother was actually conceived as the result of an incestuous relationship between Augustus and his daughter Julia the Elder.[39]

In AD 38, Caligula focused his attention on political and public reform. He published the accounts of public funds, which had not been made public during the reign of Tiberius. He aided those who lost property in fires, abolished certain taxes, and gave out prizes to the public at gymnastic events. He allowed new members into the equestrian and senatorial orders.[40]

Perhaps most significantly, he restored the practice of democratic elections.[41]Cassius Dio said that this act "though delighting the rabble, grieved the sensible, who stopped to reflect, that if the offices should fall once more into the hands of the many... many disasters would result".[42]

During the same year, though, Caligula was criticized for executing people without full trials and for forcing his supporter Macro to commit suicide.[43]

According to Cassius Dio, a financial crisis emerged in AD 39.[43]Suetonius places the beginning of this crisis in 38.[44] Caligula's political payments for support, generosity and extravagance had exhausted the state's treasury. Ancient historians state that Caligula began falsely accusing, fining and even killing individuals for the purpose of seizing their estates.[45]

Historians describe a number of Caligula's other desperate measures. In order to gain funds, Caligula asked the public to lend the state money.[46] He levied taxes on lawsuits, weddings and prostitution.[47] Caligula began auctioning the lives of the gladiators at shows.[45][48] Wills that left items to Tiberius were reinterpreted to leave the items instead to Caligula.[49] Centurions who had acquired property by plunder were forced to turn over spoils to the state.[49]

The current and past highway commissioners were accused of incompetence and embezzlement and forced to repay money.[49] According to Suetonius, in the first year of Caligula's reign he squandered 2.7 billion sesterces that Tiberius had amassed.[50] His nephew Nero Caesar both envied and admired the fact that Gaius had run through the vast wealth Tiberius had left him in so short a time.[51]

A brief famine of unknown extent occurred, perhaps caused by this financial crisis, but Suetonius claims it resulted from Caligula's seizure of public carriages;[45] according to Seneca, grain imports were disturbed because Caligula repurposed grain boats for a pontoon bridge.[52]

Despite financial difficulties, Caligula embarked on a number of construction projects during his reign. Some were for the public good, though others were for himself.

Josephus describes Caligula's improvements to the harbours at Rhegium and Sicily, allowing increased grain imports from Egypt, as his greatest contributions.[53] These improvements may have been in response to the famine.[citation needed]

Caligula completed the temple of Augustus and the theatre of Pompey and began an amphitheatre beside the Saepta.[54] He expanded the imperial palace.[55] He began the aqueducts Aqua Claudia and Anio Novus, which Pliny the Elder considered engineering marvels.[56] He built a large racetrack known as the circus of Gaius and Nero and had an Egyptian obelisk (now known as the "Vatican Obelisk") transported by sea and erected in the middle of Rome.[57]

At Syracuse, he repaired the city walls and the temples of the gods.[54] He had new roads built and pushed to keep roads in good condition.[58] He had planned to rebuild the palace of Polycrates at Samos, to finish the temple of Didymaean Apollo at Ephesus and to found a city high up in the Alps.[54] He planned to dig a canal through the Isthmus of Corinth in Greece and sent a chief centurion to survey the work.[54]

In 39, Caligula performed a spectacular stunt by ordering a temporary floating bridge to be built using ships as pontoons, stretching for over two miles from the resort of Baiae to the neighboring port of Puteoli.[59] It was said that the bridge was to rival that of the Persian king, Xerxes, crossing of the Hellespont.[59] Caligula, who could not swim,[60] then proceeded to ride his favorite horse, Incitatus, across, wearing the breastplate of Alexander the Great.[59] This act was in defiance of a prediction by Tiberius's soothsayer Thrasyllus of Mendes that Caligula had "no more chance of becoming emperor than of riding a horse across the Bay of Baiae".[59]

Caligula had two large ships constructed for himself, which were recovered from the bottom of Lake Nemi during the dictatorship of Benito Mussolini. The ships were among the largest vessels in the ancient world. The smaller ship was designed as a temple dedicated to Diana. The larger ship was essentially an elaborate floating palace with marble floors and plumbing. Thirteen years after being raised, the ships were burned during an attack in the Second World War, and almost nothing remains of their hulls, though many archeological treasures remain intact in the museum at Lake Nemi and in the Museo Nazionale Romano (Palazzo Massimo) at Rome.[citation needed]

In AD 39, relations between Caligula and the Roman Senate deteriorated.[61] The subject of their disagreement is unknown. A number of factors, though, aggravated this feud. The Senate had become accustomed to ruling without an emperor between the departure of Tiberius for Capri in AD 26 and Caligula's accession.[62] Additionally, Tiberius's treason trials had eliminated a number of pro-Julian senators such as Asinius Gallus.[62]

Caligula reviewed Tiberius's records of treason trials and decided, based on their actions during these trials, that numerous senators were not trustworthy.[61] He ordered a new set of investigations and trials.[61] He replaced the consul and had several senators put to death.[63]Suetonius reports that other senators were degraded by being forced to wait on him and run beside his chariot.[63]

Soon after his break with the Senate, Caligula faced a number of additional conspiracies against him.[64] A conspiracy involving his brother-in-law was foiled in late 39.[64] Soon afterwards, the Governor of Germany, Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Gaetulicus, was executed for connections to a conspiracy.[64]

In AD 40, Caligula expanded the Roman Empire into Mauretania and made a significant attempt at expanding into Britannia even challenging Neptune in his campaign. The conquest of Britannia was fully realized by his successors.

Mauretania was a client kingdom of Rome ruled by Ptolemy of Mauretania. Caligula invited Ptolemy to Rome and then suddenly had him executed.[65] Mauretania was annexed by Caligula and subsequently divided into two provinces, Mauretania Tingitana and Mauretania Caesariensis, separated by the river Malua.[66] Pliny claims that division was the work of Caligula, but Dio states that in 42 AD an uprising took place, which was subdued by Gaius Suetonius Paulinus and Gnaeus Hosidius Geta, and the division only took place after this.[67] This confusion might mean that Caligula decided to divide the province, but the division was postponed because of the rebellion.[68] The first known equestrian governor of the two provinces was Marcus Fadius Celer Flavianus, in office in 44 AD.[68]

Details on the Mauretanian events of 3944 are unclear. Cassius Dio wrote an entire chapter on the annexation of Mauretania by Caligula, but it is now lost.[69] Caligula's move seemingly had a strictly personal political motive fear and jealousy of his cousin Ptolemy and thus the expansion may not have been prompted by pressing military or economic needs.[70] However, the rebellion of Tacfarinas had shown how exposed Africa Proconsularis was to its west and how the Mauretanian client kings were unable to provide protection to the province, and it is thus possible that Caligula's expansion was a prudent response to potential future threats.[68]

There seems to have been a northern campaign to Britannia that was aborted.[69] This campaign is derided by ancient historians with accounts of Gauls dressed up as Germanic tribesmen at his triumph and Roman troops ordered to collect seashells as "spoils of the sea".[71] The few primary sources disagree on what precisely occurred. Modern historians have put forward numerous theories in an attempt to explain these actions. This trip to the English Channel could have merely been a training and scouting mission.[72] The mission may have been to accept the surrender of the British chieftain Adminius.[73] "Seashells", or conchae in Latin, may be a metaphor for something else such as female genitalia (perhaps the troops visited brothels) or boats (perhaps they captured several small British boats).[74]

When several client kings came to Rome to pay their respects to him and argued about their nobility of descent, he allegedly cried out the Homeric line:[75] "Let there be one lord, one king."[76] In AD 40, Caligula began implementing very controversial policies that introduced religion into his political role. Caligula began appearing in public dressed as various gods and demigods such as Hercules, Mercury, Venus and Apollo.[77] Reportedly, he began referring to himself as a god when meeting with politicians and he was referred to as "Jupiter" on occasion in public documents.[78][79]

A sacred precinct was set apart for his worship at Miletus in the province of Asia and two temples were erected for worship of him in Rome.[79] The Temple of Castor and Pollux on the forum was linked directly to the imperial residence on the Palatine and dedicated to Caligula.[79][80] He would appear here on occasion and present himself as a god to the public. Caligula had the heads removed from various statues of gods and replaced with his own in some temples.[81] It is said that he wished to be worshipped as "Neos Helios," the "New Sun." Indeed, he was represented as a sun god on Egyptian coins.[82]

Caligula's religious policy was a departure from that of his predecessors. According to Cassius Dio, living emperors could be worshipped as divine in the east and dead emperors could be worshipped as divine in Rome.[83]Augustus had the public worship his spirit on occasion, but Dio describes this as an extreme act that emperors generally shied away from.[83] Caligula took things a step further and had those in Rome, including senators, worship him as a tangible, living god.[84]

Caligula needed to quell several riots and conspiracies in the eastern territories during his reign. Aiding him in his actions was his good friend, Herod Agrippa, who became governor of the territories of Batanaea and Trachonitis after Caligula became emperor in AD 37.[85]

The cause of tensions in the east was complicated, involving the spread of Greek culture, Roman Law and the rights of Jews in the empire.

Caligula did not trust the prefect of Egypt, Aulus Avilius Flaccus. Flaccus had been loyal to Tiberius, had conspired against Caligula's mother and had connections with Egyptian separatists.[86] In AD 38, Caligula sent Agrippa to Alexandria unannounced to check on Flaccus.[87] According to Philo, the visit was met with jeers from the Greek population who saw Agrippa as the king of the Jews.[88] Flaccus tried to placate both the Greek population and Caligula by having statues of the emperor placed in Jewish synagogues.[89] As a result, riots broke out in the city.[90] Caligula responded by removing Flaccus from his position and executing him.[91]

In AD 39, Agrippa accused Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, of planning a rebellion against Roman rule with the help of Parthia. Herod Antipas confessed and Caligula exiled him. Agrippa was rewarded with his territories.[92]

Riots again erupted in Alexandria in AD 40 between Jews and Greeks.[93] Jews were accused of not honoring the emperor.[93] Disputes occurred in the city of Jamnia.[94] Jews were angered by the erection of a clay altar and destroyed it.[94] In response, Caligula ordered the erection of a statue of himself in the Jewish Temple of Jerusalem,[95] a demand in conflict with Jewish monotheism.[96] In this context, Philo wrote that Caligula "regarded the Jews with most especial suspicion, as if they were the only persons who cherished wishes opposed to his".[96]

The Governor of Syria, Publius Petronius, fearing civil war if the order were carried out, delayed implementing it for nearly a year.[97] Agrippa finally convinced Caligula to reverse the order.[93]

Philo of Alexandria and Seneca the Younger describe Caligula as an insane emperor who was self-absorbed, angry, killed on a whim, and indulged in too much spending and sex.[98] He is accused of sleeping with other men's wives and bragging about it,[99] killing for mere amusement,[100] deliberately wasting money on his bridge, causing starvation,[101] and wanting a statue of himself erected in the Temple of Jerusalem for his worship.[95] Once, at some games at which he was presiding, he ordered his guards to throw an entire section of the crowd into the arena during intermission to be eaten by animals because there were no criminals to be prosecuted and he was bored.[102][clarification needed]

While repeating the earlier stories, the later sources of Suetonius and Cassius Dio provide additional tales of insanity. They accuse Caligula of incest with his sisters, Agrippina the Younger, Drusilla, and Livilla, and say he prostituted them to other men.[103] They state he sent troops on illogical military exercises,[69][104] turned the palace into a brothel,[46] and, most famously, planned or promised to make his horse, Incitatus, a consul,[105] and actually appointed him a priest.[79]

The validity of these accounts is debatable. In Roman political culture, insanity and sexual perversity were often presented hand-in-hand with poor government.[106]

Caligula's actions as emperor were described as being especially harsh to the senate, to the nobility and to the equestrian order.[107] According to Josephus, these actions led to several failed conspiracies against Caligula.[108] Eventually, officers within the Praetorian Guard led by Cassius Chaerea succeeded in murdering the emperor.[109] The plot is described as having been planned by three men, but many in the senate, army and equestrian order were said to have been informed of it and involved in it.[110]

The situation had escalated when, in 40 AD, Caligula announced to the senate that he planned to leave Rome permanently and to move to Alexandria in Egypt, where he hoped to be worshiped as a living god. The prospect of Rome losing its emperor and thus its political power was the final straw for many. Such a move would have left both the senate and the Praetorian Guard powerless to stop Caligula's repression and debauchery. With this in mind Chaerea convinced his fellow conspirators to put their plot into action quickly.

According to Josephus, Chaerea had political motivations for the assassination.[111] Suetonius sees the motive in Caligula calling Chaerea derogatory names.[112] Caligula considered Chaerea effeminate because of a weak voice and for not being firm with tax collection.[113] Caligula would mock Chaerea with names like "Priapus" and "Venus".[114]

On 22 January 41 (Suetonius gives the date as 24 January), Cassius Chaerea and other guardsmen accosted Caligula as he addressed an acting troupe of young men during a series of games and dramatics held for the Divine Augustus.[115] Details recorded on the events vary somewhat from source to source, but they agree that Chaerea stabbed Caligula first, followed by a number of conspirators.[116] Suetonius records that Caligula's death resembled that of Julius Caesar. He states that both the elder Gaius Julius Caesar (Julius Caesar) and the younger Gaius Julius Caesar (Caligula) were stabbed 30 times by conspirators led by a man named Cassius (Cassius Longinus and Cassius Chaerea).[117] By the time Caligula's loyal Germanic guard responded, the Emperor was already dead. The Germanic guard, stricken with grief and rage, responded with a rampaging attack on the assassins, conspirators, innocent senators and bystanders alike.[118]

The cryptoporticus (underground corridor) beneath the imperial palaces on the Palatine Hill where this event took place was discovered by archaeologists in 2008.[119]

The senate attempted to use Caligula's death as an opportunity to restore the republic.[120] Chaerea tried to persuade the military to support the senate.[121] The military, though, remained loyal to the idea of imperial monarchy.[121] The grieving Roman people assembled and demanded that Caligula's murderers be brought to justice.[122] Uncomfortable with lingering imperial support, the assassins sought out and stabbed Caligula's wife, Caesonia, and killed their young daughter, Julia Drusilla, by smashing her head against a wall.[123] They were unable to reach Caligula's uncle, Claudius; after a soldier, Gratus, found Claudius hiding behind a palace curtain he was spirited out of the city by a sympathetic faction of the Praetorian Guard [124] to the nearby Praetorian camp.[125]

Claudius became emperor after procuring the support of the Praetorian Guard. He ordered the execution of Chaerea and of any other known conspirators involved in the death of Caligula.[126] According to Suetonius, Caligula's body was placed under turf until it was burned and entombed by his sisters. He was buried within the Mausoleum of Augustus; in 410, during the Sack of Rome ashes in the tomb were scattered.

The history of Caligula's reign is extremely problematic as only two sources contemporary with Caligula have survived the works of Philo and Seneca. Philo's works, On the Embassy to Gaius and Flaccus, give some details on Caligula's early reign, but mostly focus on events surrounding the Jewish population in Judea and Egypt with whom he sympathizes. Seneca's various works give mostly scattered anecdotes on Caligula's personality. Seneca was almost put to death by Caligula in AD 39 likely due to his associations with conspirators.[127]

At one time, there were detailed contemporaneous histories on Caligula, but they are now lost. Additionally, the historians who wrote them are described as biased, either overly critical or praising of Caligula.[128] Nonetheless, these lost primary sources, along with the works of Seneca and Philo, were the basis of surviving secondary and tertiary histories on Caligula written by the next generations of historians. A few of the contemporaneous historians are known by name. Fabius Rusticus and Cluvius Rufus both wrote condemning histories on Caligula that are now lost. Fabius Rusticus was a friend of Seneca who was known for historical embellishment and misrepresentation.[129] Cluvius Rufus was a senator involved in the assassination of Caligula.[130]

Caligula's sister, Agrippina the Younger, wrote an autobiography that certainly included a detailed explanation of Caligula's reign, but it too is lost. Agrippina was banished by Caligula for her connection to Marcus Lepidus, who conspired against Caligula.[64] The inheritance of Nero, Agrippina's son and the future emperor, was seized by Caligula. Gaetulicus, a poet, produced a number of flattering writings about Caligula, but they too are lost.

The bulk of what is known of Caligula comes from Suetonius and Cassius Dio. Suetonius wrote his history on Caligula 80 years after his death, while Cassius Dio wrote his history over 180 years after Caligula's death. Cassius Dio's work is invaluable because it alone gives a loose chronology of Caligula's reign.

A handful of other sources add a limited perspective on Caligula. Josephus gives a detailed description of Caligula's assassination. Tacitus provides some information on Caligula's life under Tiberius. In a now lost portion of his Annals, Tacitus gave a detailed history of Caligula. Pliny the Elder's Natural History has a few brief references to Caligula.

There are few surviving sources on Caligula and no surviving source paints Caligula in a favorable light. The paucity of sources has resulted in significant gaps in modern knowledge of the reign of Caligula. Little is written on the first two years of Caligula's reign. Additionally, there are only limited details on later significant events, such as the annexation of Mauretania, Caligula's military actions in Britannia, and his feud with the Roman Senate.

All surviving sources, except Pliny the Elder, characterize Caligula as insane. However, it is not known whether they are speaking figuratively or literally. Additionally, given Caligula's unpopularity among the surviving sources, it is difficult to separate fact from fiction. Recent sources are divided in attempting to ascribe a medical reason for his behavior, citing as possibilities encephalitis, epilepsy or meningitis. The question of whether or not Caligula was insane (especially after his illness early in his reign) remains unanswered.

Philo of Alexandria, Josephus and Seneca state that Caligula was insane, but describe this madness as a personality trait that came through experience.[92][131][132] Seneca states that Caligula became arrogant, angry and insulting once becoming emperor and uses his personality flaws as examples his readers can learn from.[133] According to Josephus, power made Caligula incredibly conceited and led him to think he was a god.[92]Philo of Alexandria reports that Caligula became ruthless after nearly dying of an illness in the eighth month of his reign in AD 37.[134]Juvenal reports he was given a magic potion that drove him insane.

Suetonius said that Caligula suffered from "falling sickness", or epilepsy, when he was young.[135] Modern historians have theorized that Caligula lived with a daily fear of seizures.[136] Despite swimming being a part of imperial education, Caligula could not swim.[137] Epileptics are discouraged from swimming in open waters because unexpected fits in such difficult rescue circumstances can be fatal.[138] Additionally, Caligula reportedly talked to the full moon.[63] Epilepsy was long associated with the moon.[139]

Some modern historians think that Caligula suffered from hyperthyroidism.[140] This diagnosis is mainly attributed to Caligula's irritability and his "stare" as described by Pliny the Elder.

On 17 January 2011, police in Nemi, Italy, announced that they believed they had discovered the site of Caligula's burial, after arresting a thief caught smuggling a statue which they believed to be of the emperor.[141] The claim has been met with scepticism by Cambridge historian Mary Beard.[142]

Quadrans celebrating the abolition of a tax in AD 38 by Caligula. The obverse of the coin contains a picture of a Pileus which symbolizes the liberation of the people from the tax burden.

Welsh actor Emlyn Williams was cast as Caligula in the never-completed 1937 film I, Claudius.[143]

American actor Jay Robinson famously portrayed a sinister and scene-stealing Caligula in two epic films of the 1950s, The Robe (1953) and its sequel Demetrius and the Gladiators (1954).[144]

A feature-length historical film Caligula was completed in 1979, in which Malcolm McDowell played the lead role. The film alienated audiences with explicit sex and violence. Although reviews were overwhelmingly negative (though McDowell's performance as the title character was praised), the film is considered to be a cult classic.[145]

David Brandon portrayed Caligula in the 1982 Italian exploitation film Emperor Caligula, the Untold Story which was directed by Joe D'Amato.[citation needed]

Courtney Love appeared as Caligula in a fake trailer for Gore Vidal's Caligula, ostensibly a remake of the 1979 film, but actually a parodic short film by conceptual artist Francesco Vezzoli.[143]

Szabolcs Hajdu portrayed Caligula in the 1996 film Caligula.[citation needed]

Caligula, by French author Albert Camus, is a play in which Caligula returns after deserting the palace for three days and three nights following the death of his beloved sister, Drusilla. The young emperor then uses his unfettered power to "bring the impossible into the realm of the likely".

In the 1934 novel I, Claudius by English writer Robert Graves, Caligula is presented as being a murderous sociopath from his childhood, who became clinically insane early in his reign. At the age of only seven, he drove his father Germanicus to despair and death by secretly terrorising him. Graves's Caligula commits incest with all three of his sisters and is implied to have murdered Drusilla.

In the BBC series based on Graves' novel (where the role is played by John Hurt), Caligula, although unhinged since early childhood, becomes dangerously psychotic after an apparent epileptic seizure and awakens believing that he has metamorphosed into the god Zeus. He kills Drusilla while trying to reenact the birth of Athena by cutting his child from her womb.

In 1941, Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote I Am a Barbarian. The story is pitched as a free translation of the memoirs of Britannicus (a fictional character created by Burroughs) who was the slave of Caligula from early childhood till Caligula's death.

The character Ellsworth Toohey in Ayn Rand's 1943 novel The Fountainhead references Caligula in his climactic speech to Peter Keating stating, "Remember the Roman Emperor who said he wished humanity had a single neck so he could cut it? People have laughed at him for centuries. But we'll have the last laugh. We've accomplished what he couldn't accomplish. We've taught men to unite. This makes one neck ready for one leash."

The play The Reckoning of Kit and Little Boots, by Nat Cassidy, examines the lives of the Elizabethan playwright Christopher Marlowe and Caligula, with the fictional conceit that Marlowe was working on a play about Caligula around the time of his own murder. It emphasizes the similarities between the two charactersboth stabbed to death at 29, both in part as a result of their controversial religious perspectives. The play focuses on Caligula's love for his sister Drusilla and his deep-rooted loathing for Tiberius. It received its world premiere in New York City in June 2008.[146][147]

Eugene O'Neill's play Lazarus Laughed features the young Caligula as one of its pinnacle characters, where he is portrayed as a psychopath who believes he will only be happy once Tiberius is dead and he is the Caesar.

Canadian death metal band Ex Deo released an album called Caligula, styled as Caligvla. The band's video, "I Caligula", features Caligula and other members of his court that were important in his rule.

The Dickies' 1989 album Second Coming includes the song "Caligula," which relates his origins and reign of terror.

Welsh musician John Cale performed a song called "Caligula", which was part of his cycle composed for the centenary of the Christmas truce in December 2014.[148]

German thrash metal band Sodom released Decision Day in 2016, it includes the song Caligula. Two weeks before the release of the album, they released a lyrical music video of the song.

In The Smiths song "Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now" Caligula is referenced in the lyric 'Caligula would have blushed'.

Caligula has been portrayed in a number of television series:

Visit link:
Caligula - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read More...

Longevity Book – amazon.com

Saturday, September 3rd, 2016

New York Times bestseller

Cameron Diaz follows up her #1 New York Times bestseller, The Body Book, with a personal, practical, and authoritative guide that examines the art and science of growing older and offers concrete steps women can take to create abundant health and resilience as they age.

Cameron Diaz wrote The Body Book to help educate young women about how their bodies function, empowering them to make better-informed choices about their health and encouraging them to look beyond the latest health trends to understand their bodies at the cellular level. She interviewed doctors, scientists, nutritionists, and a host of other experts, and shared what shed learnedand what she wished shed known twenty years earlier.

Now Cameron continues the journey she began, opening a conversation with her peers on an essential topic that that for too long has been taboo in our society: the aging female body. In The Longevity Book, she shares the latest scientific research on how and why we age, synthesizing insights from top medical experts and with her own thoughts, opinions, and experiences.

The Longevity Book explores what history, biology, neuroscience, and the womens health movement can teach us about maintaining optimal health as we transition from our thirties to midlife. From understanding how growing older impacts various bodily systems to the biological differences in the way aging effects men and women; the latest science on telomeres and slowing the rate of cognitive decline to how meditation heals us and why love, friendship, and laughter matter for health, The Longevity Book offers an all-encompassing, holistic look at how the female body agesand what we can all do to age better.

Excerpt from:
Longevity Book - amazon.com

Read More...

Intermittent fasting for health and longevity / Getting …

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

One of the primary topics covered on this blog is intermittent fasting (IF). Many approach IF as a diet or weight loss method. I know from research, personal experience and conversations with others that IF can indeed be an effective way to drop unwanted pounds. However, viewing IF as merely a new way to diet entirely misses what I believe is the most important reason to pursue it: the activation of hormetic processes that foster improved health, keep degenerative diseases at bay, and hold out the promise of a longer, more vibrant life. These benefits are a known consequence of calorie restriction, but intermittent fasting offers a more comfortable and versatile way to reap the benefits of calorie restriction without the sense of deprivation, the loss of lean body mass, and the metabolic risks that have been associated with simple calorie restriction.

It is because Ive found intermittent fasting to be an attractive practice, both scientifically and personally, that I was so excited to be invited to give a lecture on IF at The 3rd Door, an innovative health and fitness studio, cafe and social center in downtown Palo Alto. The fitness director at The Third Door, Johnny Nguyen, is himself an advocate and practitoner of IF, which he blogs about with great flair and common sense at The Lean Saloon. The talk gave me an opportunity to reframe intermittent fasting in the terms of the philosophy of Hormetism, or applied hormesis that I write about on this blog. I believe that the framework of hormesis helps to make sense of why IF works, and why it is so much more than a diet.

What follows is a video of my talk on the benefits of intermittent fasting, presented on May 18, 2011 at The 3rd Door. I would like to thank Dianne Giancarlo and Johnny Nguyen for inviting me to speak, Vaciliki Papademetriou for technical assistance, Francesca Freedman for introducing me to The Third Door, Tom Merson for the still photos and Ken Becker for the masterful video production.

The talk is divided in to five sections for ease of viewing. It was followed by a 30 minute question and answer session, which I will upload as soon as the video production is complete:

Part 1: The benefits of calorie restriction

Part 2: Calorie restriction and hormesis

Part 3: Intermittent fasting and diet myths

Part 4: How intermittent fasting turns you into a flex fuel vehicle

Part 5: Practical advice on how to get started with intermittent fasting

Within the coming week, I will add here a recording of the 30-minute question and answer session following the talk.

If the above talk was of interest, you can find more detailed information in two of my other posts:

Follow this link:
Intermittent fasting for health and longevity / Getting ...

Read More...

My Longevity – Life expectancy calculator, life expectancy …

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Our aim is to help you understand how long you might live and what you can do about it.

"How long will I live"and "what could I do to live longer?" are vital questions for everyone.

Most people want answers to how long will I live and what can I do about it.

Most people have no idea how long they might live. The starting point is your current age.You could then use the Australian Life Tables but these are only averages and also fail to factor in ongoing improvements in mortality.They don't explain that the longer you live,the longer you're likely to live. Or that ageing is a personal journey.

Few people really understand how many factors influence their ageing and life expectance.The starting point is your current age. The Australian Life Tables give average life expectancies but are not useful at a personal level - we are all different! Also, they do not allow for the trend for successive generations to be living longer and ageing better.

Many different factors influence how long you will live. The Australian Life Tables give averages for each age group . However none of us is "average"and the personal differences can be very important.Each generation is living longer than the last. The "official" tables do not take full account of these changes in life expectancy or the personal nature of ageing.

On our website you can learn about your own situation. The first step is to complete a simple analysis.The questions cover these five key areas.

You can learn more about your own life expectancy by completing a simple analysis. Five key areas are covered by the questions

You can learn more about whether or not you may live longer than average by answering questions which cover five key areas.

The rest is here:
My Longevity - Life expectancy calculator, life expectancy ...

Read More...

Aging and Longevity News for Senior Citizens

Thursday, August 4th, 2016

Dr. Carin van Zyl talks to Jose Garcia Flores about his treatment. His wife listens.

Aging & Longevity

Need for palliative care highlighted by new aid-in-dying laws

Contrary to some patients fears, palliative care doctors are not there to hasten death

By Anna Gorman, Kaiser Health News

Dec. 1, 2015 More times than she can count, Dr. Carin van Zyl has heard terminally ill patients beg to die. They tell her they cant handle the pain, that the nausea is unbearable and the anxiety overwhelming.

Aging & Longevity

Aid-In-Dying advocacy group ready for battles after California victory

Check map to see if your state is considering aid-in-dying or already has it

Dec. 1, 2015 - Fresh off a political triumph in California, the nations chief advocacy group for physician-assisted suicide laws, Compassion & Choices, is mobilizing for many more battles on behalf of terminally ill patients. More...

Aging & Longevity

Retirement may not be bliss many expect before reaching age 65

Key factors physical impairment, chronic medical conditions, approach of death depress seniors

Nov. 14, 2015 - A new study punches a hole in the balloon of happiness and bliss that many have associated with turning age 65, which is generally considered the age we become senior citizens. The new study says we become more depressed from age 65 onward. More...

Aging & Longevity

Aid-in-Dying Bill to become law in California

Gov. Jerry Brown says it is what he would want; terminally ill can buy lethal medication

Oct. 5, 2015 - California Gov. Jerry Brown says it all came down to what he would want in the face of his own death, when he signed landmark legislation today to allow terminally ill patients to obtain lethal medication to end their lives.

Aging & Longevity

Do you know that person or is aging memory just confusing you?

Scientists have identified part of hippocampus that creates, processes this type of memory

Aug. 20, 2015 - You see a person at the store. They look familiar. Is this an old classmate or do they just look alike? Or is your aging brain just confusing you. One tiny spot in the hippocampus of the brain has the answer, scientists have discovered.

Aging & Longevity

Is longevity linked to intelligence shorter life may surprise many

First research to seek answer confirms some smart people live longer but its mostly genetic

Aug. 3, 2015 We probably know a lot of people who are going to a die a lot early than they think, if new research is accurate. There is a recognized tendency for more intelligent people to live longer, but it may not be because they are smarter.

Aging & Longevity

Senior citizens can follow five easy steps to avoid heart failure

These simple lifestyle factors cut risk of heart failure after age 65

June 14, 2015 Senior citizens people age 65 and older can follow five simple healthy behaviors and their risk of heart failure will be cut in half, says a large, multi-year study. More...

Aging & Longevity

Have they found a path to longevity without severe fasting

Study with mice and humans indicates severe fasting may not be only answer

June 14, 2015 Success in extending the lifespan of mice with a calorie-restricted diet for only eight days a month led scientist to try it with a small group of people and it appears to have worked. More...

Aging & Longevity

Tablets can help senior citizens cross the 'digital divide'

They make it easier for older people to get online, breaking down barriers that kept them from getting connected

June 9, 2015 - Too often, senior citizens are introduced to the digital world through a computer or tiny hand-held phone. And, too often, they find the challenge too much for their resolve. There is an easier way, according to new research, and its called a tablet. More...

Aging & Longevity

Seniors who have trouble sorting out different smells face shorter lives

This is not first study to find smell as factor in longevity.

June 3, 2015 A new study supports earlier findings that when older people have trouble distinguishing between odors they appear to have a shorter life span. The latest study of people on Medicare found a high death rate for those with the worse smell test scores, which was the same finding of a study released last October. More...

Aging & Longevity

This is despite higher rates of multiple underlying conditions on admission

May 26, 2015 - Patients aged 80 and above are significantly less likely to be carefully examined or aggressively treated after surgery than their younger counterparts, reveals a national audit of hospital deaths in Australia, published in the online journal BMJ Open. More...

Aging & Longevity

Elder Orphans emerges to identify childless, unmarried, vulnerable baby boomers

22 percent of Americans over age 65 currently or at risk to remain unsupported, vulnerable while elderly, says new research

May 20,2015, Great Neck, NY - With an aging Baby Boomer population and increasing numbers of childless and unmarried seniors, nearly one-quarter of Americans over age 65 are currently or at risk to become "elder orphans," a vulnerable group requiring greater awareness and advocacy efforts, according to new research by a North Shore-LIJ geriatrician and palliative care physician. More...

Aging & Longevity

Longevity facts revealed in 50 year study of men who made it to 100

Among interesting discovers: longevity more closely related to mothers than fathers; 20% had dementia; cardiovascular disease big killer

May 5, 2015 A 50-year study of men born in 1913 has found that only 10 of 855 (1.2%) lived to become centenarians 100 years of age. The study provides interesting insight after the age of 80 as to the causes of death and the numbers with dementia. The researchers also have some ideas on what it takes to reach the age of 100. More...

Aging & Longevity

Senior citizens need to understand Cognitive Aging not Alzheimers or dementia

New free report from Institute of Health is a good source for understanding the mental challenges of aging

By Tucker Sutherland, editor-publisher, SeniorJournal.com

April 23, 2015 As one who for years nursed a mother as she faded into the abyss of Alzheimers and has written extensively on senior citizen topics, I am stunned at how little we know about cognitive aging. Still, AD and memory problems come up almost every time two or more senior citizens get together. A new book that is available free from the Institute of Medicine has already made me a whole lot better informed on cognitive aging and I hope it gets wide distribution. More...

Aging & Longevity

Senior citizens jubilant after a good house cleaning, so the research shows

Keeping their homes maintained more important physically, mentally than where they live, what they own

April 16, 2015 - Senior citizens who keep a clean and orderly home tend to feel emotionally and physically better after tackling house chores. The reason for this jubilance is the exercise it takes to get the job done, according to new findings by a Case Western Reserve University school of nursing researcher. More...

Aging & Longevity

Can aging face become more likeable, feminine with plastic surgery?

Study in Journal of American Medical Association says there is more to the surgery than looking younger

April 9, 2015 Senior citizens usually think of facial plastic surgery as a way to look younger. A new study the first to examine perceptions after plastic surgery has found it does more than make you look youthful. It concludes that women who have certain procedures are perceived as having greater social skills and are more likeable, attractive and feminine. More...

Aging & Longevity

Chronically lonely seniors likely to turn to physicians for social contact

More doctors' office visits by older adults suffering chronic loneliness

April 3, 2015 - Experiences of loneliness and social isolation can lead to increased health care use among seniors, finds new research from the University of Georgia College of Public Health. More...

Aging News from other media

Great-grandma skydives and swims with sharks for 100th birthday

March 16, 2015 - Georgina Harwood celebrated her 100th year in style Saturday by skydiving in Cape Town, South Africa. Her friends and family joined her, watching safely from the ground. You might say she's the coolest 100-year-old person that has ever lived, considering she started skydiving at age 92. Read more, see video - Mashable

Aging News from other media

Seven financial scams that target seniors

March 6, 2015 - As many senior citizens spend their retirement traveling with family, pursuing second careers or becoming more active in the community, con artists are creating devious schemes to prey on their accumulated wealth. Fox Business

Aging & Longevity

Aging in Place sounds great but may not be for Boomers or their parents

There is a lot more going on at the group home to support successful aging

Feb. 25, 2015 - Baby boomers trying to pick the best living arrangements for themselves or their parents as they age should be wary of a phrase they coined in their younger years: If it feels good, do it. More...

Aging & Longevity

When one half of elderly couple stops driving it impacts both

Having a spouse who still drives does not remove the consequences of driving cessation for senior citizens

Feb. 24, 2015 Even if just one member of a senior couple stops driving, negative consequences result for both the driver and non-driver, according to a new study from the University of Missouri. It recommends that the elderly, and their adult children, carefully discuss and plan for the transition to driving cessation. More...

Aging News Other Media

At 90, She's Designing Tech for Aging Boomers

Jan. 20, 2015 - In Silicon Valley's youth-obsessed culture, 40-year-olds get plastic surgery to fit in. But IDEO, the firm that famously developed the first mouse for Apple, has a 90-year-old designer on staff. Barbara Beskind says her age is an advantage. "Everybody who ages is going to be their own problem-solver," she says. And designers are problem-solvers. More at NPR

Aging & Longevity

What is successful aging? Gerontologists still trying to reach agreement

Is the bottom line of successful aging for many elderly Americans simply surviving with reasonable cognition and some mobility, or is it much broader

Feb. 16, 2015 The debate over defining successful aging is raging again among the professionals in the field of gerontology. Despite books, years of research and numerous analytical articles in the past, there are 16 articles in the latest issue of The Gerontologist. One suggests those in the U.S. define it in more multidimensional terms than do most scholars. More...

Aging & Longevity

Love is in the air and here is proof you are never too old to fall in love

Residents at retirement communities around the country find love in their golden years

Feb. 12, 2015 - As Valentines Day approaches, seniors across the country who have lost their sweethearts are finding love again - but this time, it is with fellow residents in senior living communities, according to Holiday Retirement, that operates homes for senior citizens. More...

Aging & Longevity

Is surgery a viable option for patients age 80 plus with acute spinal conditions?

Study found no difference in complications, mortality when compared to younger patients

Read the original:
Aging and Longevity News for Senior Citizens

Read More...

Page 46«..1020..45464748..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick