header logo image


Page 25«..1020..24252627..3040..»

Archive for the ‘Gene therapy’ Category

5 Biotech Stocks That Could Be Worth a Look After an Analyst Started Coverage – Barron’s

Wednesday, August 26th, 2020

Text size

Newly-hired analyst Danielle Brill launched coverage at Raymond James this week with a 490-page survey of her favorite biotech stocks. Atop the list are hematology drugmaker Acceleron Pharma and the gene therapy developer uniQure.

Brill thinks Acceleron (ticker: XLRN) could rise at least 60%, while uniQure (QURE) could nearly double. Shes also partial to the neurology stock Acadia Pharmaceuticals (ACAD), the hematology stock Global Blood Therapeutics (GBT), and Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT).

Acceleron has two potential blockbusters, writes Brill in her Monday report. In partnership with Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY), the company recently launched sales of an anemia drug Reblozyl. An investigational drug called sotatercept did well in Phase 2 trials for pulmonary arterial hypertension, a serious congenital disease that can require lung transplants.

After its November 2019 launch, sales of Reblozyl rose to $55 million in the June 2020 quarter as a treatment for beta thalassemia and for a particular type of blood cancer. Brill thinks that the drugs annual sales could exceed $3 billion by the end of the decade, yielding annual royalties of over $750 million for Acceleron. As for sotatercept, she thinks its annual sales could hit $2 billion.

So Raymond James rates Acceleron a Strong Buy, and Brill believes its $92 stock could hit $155.

She also has a Strong Buy on uniQure, saying that its stock could rise more than 90% from its recent price of $39, to at least $75. The shares sold off this year after uniQure licensed its investigational treatment for a kind of hemophilia at a price some investors thought was too low. But Brill thinks the deal made commercial sense and gave uniQure cash to advance its just-started clinical trials of a gene therapy for the deadly neurological disorder Huntingtons disease, which killed songwriter Woody Guthrie, among others.

The first couple of Huntingtons patients were dosed with the gene therapy in June and suffered no safety problems. Brill expects uniQure to have efficacy data in 2021. If the Huntingtons gene therapy succeeds, she predicts a $7 billion annual market for uniQure.

Acadia Pharmaceuticals gets an Outperform rating from Brill. The stock sank from $57 to its current level of $38, after the June news that Acadias drug Nuplazid failed a pivotal trial as a treatment for depression. Nuplazid is already approved as a treatment for psychosis from Parkinsons disease and it allowed Acadia to have 2019 revenue of $340 million, with a loss of $235 million, or $1.60 a share.

By April of next year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will decide whether to approve Nuplazid for the large market of dementia patients who suffer psychosis. If approved, the added sales could ultimately exceed $3 billion a year, predicts Brill, while bringing Acadia to profitability by 2022. Good news on Nuplazid would lift Acadia stock to her target of $65.

Global Blood is one of a number of companies bringing long-overdue treatments to the blood disorder known as sickle cell disease. Brill rates its stock an Outperform. In December 2019, the company launched the drug Oxbryta and sales have taken off nicely. If the drugs adoption continues, Brill predicts that it could accrue more than 30,000 patients worldwide, brining annual sales close to $2 billion. That would bring in more than $9 a share in earnings by 2025, she says, and merits her price target of $115 for Global Bloods stock, which currently goes for $64.

Another Outperform rating goes to Sarepta Therapeutics, which aims to add a gene therapy to its approved treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Data on the gene therapys Phase 2 study will come out in the first quarter of 2021. Brill is optimistic, based on improvements seen in the three of the four patients treated in the Phase 1 trial. The stock market reaction to next years Phase 2 results will be dramatic, she predicts, sending Sarepta shares up or down by $100. Shes a believer and has a $200 price target on the $149 stock.

Write to Bill Alpert at william.alpert@barrons.com

Go here to see the original:
5 Biotech Stocks That Could Be Worth a Look After an Analyst Started Coverage - Barron's

Read More...

Expression Therapeutics Announces Success in Developing a Stem Cell Lentiviral Gene Therapy for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) – PRNewswire

Monday, August 24th, 2020

ATLANTA, Aug. 24, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Primary HLH is a family of devastating primary immune deficiencies with limited treatment options and no gene therapies under clinical testing. Expression Therapeutics has developed a promising and potentially curative gene therapy candidate for familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) type 3 (FHL3). Untreated, FHL3 presents as a hyper-inflammatory state with multi-organ damage leading to premature death. Expression Therapeutics expects to rapidly progress candidates for other common forms of primary HLH as well.

"We are excited to announce this expansion of our gene and cell therapy pipeline beyond our lead stem cell lentiviral gene therapy candidate for hemophilia A that is entering Phase 1 clinical testing. Through ongoing research and development incorporating our core technology platforms, Expression Therapeutics has been able to rapidly generate promising therapeutic candidates for our HLH portfolio and several other critical disease areas with significant unmet clinical need," said Christopher Doering, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer of Expression Therapeutics.

Proof of concept for stem cell lentiviral gene therapy of FHL3 was demonstrated using primary patient cells and a genetic mouse model of FHL3. A key component in this success was the integration of one of Expression Therapeutics' core technology platforms that facilitates the rapid generation of transgenes with superior potency. Our lead candidate successfully restored exocytosis and cytolytic function to primary patient cells as well as a murine disease model strongly supporting the advancement of this pipeline product candidate.

"We believe there are three key aspects to FHL3 that make it a strong candidate for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) lentiviral vector (LV) gene therapy. First, preclinical and clinical studies suggest that less than 20% genetically corrected cells are required to reverse most FHL3 disease symptoms. Second, because of the autologous nature of stem cell-based lentiviral gene therapy, the grave risk of graft vs host disease is eliminated. Third, with stem cell-based lentiviral gene therapy there will be no wait time to find a sufficiently human leukocyte antigen-matched donor," said Trent Spencer, Ph.D., President of Expression Therapeutics.

According to Deanna Fournier, Executive Director of the Histiocytosis Association, "We are very excited about the possibilities this work offers. Our HLH community, and the entire histiocytosis community, is very hopeful and excited about the future!"

Expression Therapeutics is a biotechnology company based in Atlanta and Cincinnati. The current therapeutic pipeline includes advanced gene therapies for hemophilia, neuroblastoma, T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and primary immunodeficiencies such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

For inquiries, please contact:

Ashley WalshDirector of Corporate DevelopmentExpression Therapeutics 1860 Montreal RoadTucker, Georgia 30084[emailprotected]+1 312.637.2975www.expressiontherapeutics.com

SOURCE Expression Therapeutics

http://www.expressiontherapeutics.com

Excerpt from:
Expression Therapeutics Announces Success in Developing a Stem Cell Lentiviral Gene Therapy for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) - PRNewswire

Read More...

Audentes’ rare disease gene therapy programme indefinitely delayed after third patient death – PMLiVE

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Audentes Therapeutics has indefinitely delayed plans to seek regulatory approval for its rare disease gene therapy after the death of a third patient involved in a clinical trial of the drug.

This was the third death of a patient involved in the Audentes ASPIRO clinical trial, which is evaluating its AT132 gene therapy in patients with X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLTM), a rare neuromuscular disease.

XLTM mainly affects males and causes muscle weakness that ranges in severity from mild to life-threatening. In severe forms of the disease, the weakened muscle make breathing difficult and can lead to respiratory failure. The genetic disorder has a mortality rate of around 25% by the age of ten.

AT132 is an aden-associated virus (AAV) based gene therapy that is designed to deliver the MTM1 gene deficient in XLMTM. According to Audentes, preliminary findings show that the immediate cause of death of the third patient was gastrointestinal bleeding.

The patient ws one of three study participants who had received AT132 at a dose of 3x1014 vg/kg, the higher dose, who subsequently began to demonstrate signs of liver dysfunction within three to four weeks after initial dosing.

The three patients also demonstrated evidence of pre-existing hepatobiliary disease, although over half of the patients enrolled in the study also showed evidence of the same pre-existing conditions.

Audentes, which was bought by Japanese pharma company Astellas last year, was forced to put the ASPIRO trial on hold in June after disclosing the first two patient deaths.

Audentes, together with the ASPIRO investigators and independent Data Monitoring Committee, continues to closely monitor all patients enrolled in the study. Additionally, Audentes investigation into why these three patients developed progressive liver dysfunction is ongoing, the company said in a statement.

Although the study is currently on hold, Audentes maintained that there are no other patients involved in the trial that are known to be experiencing similar liver disfunction.

The company plans to provide further information on the ASPIRO programme based on both ongoing data collection and future regulatory status updates.

Go here to see the original:
Audentes' rare disease gene therapy programme indefinitely delayed after third patient death - PMLiVE

Read More...

Outlook on the Worldwide Gene Therapy Industry to 2024 – Insights & Forecast with Potential Impact of COVID-19 – GlobeNewswire

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Dublin, Aug. 24, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Global Gene Therapy Market (by Cell Type, Vector Type, Application, End-User & Region): Insights & Forecast with Potential Impact of COVID-19 (2020-2024)" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

The global gene therapy market is expected to reach US$ 6.42 billion in 2024, witnessing growth at a CAGR of 19.29%, over the period 2020-2024.

Growth in the gene therapy market has accrued due to the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, rising healthcare expenditure, expanding urbanization, growth of gene therapy clinical trials and upsurge in economic growth. The market is anticipated to experience certain trends like rapid adoption of personalized medicine, growing occurrence of genetic disorders, advancements in gene therapy and increasing R&D funding. The growth of the market would be challenged by side effects of gene therapy and ethical and safety concerns and high cost of the treatment.

The global gene therapy market has been segmented on the basis of cell type, vector type, application, end-user and region. Depending on the cell type, the market can be bifurcated into somatic cell gene therapy and germ cell gene therapy. According to the vector type, the global gene therapy market can be categorized into retrovirus & gammaretrovirus, adeno-associated viruses (AAV), lentivirus, adenovirus, modified herpes simplex virus and non-viral plasmid vector. Whereas, on the basis of application, the market can be split into oncological disorders, neurological disorders, infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, rare diseases and others. Further, in terms of end-user, the global gene therapy market can broadly be segmented into hospitals, specialty treatment centers and other end-users.

The fastest-growing regional market is North America due to the rising incidence of cancer and other target diseases, increasing favorable reimbursement scenario in the region and improvements in healthcare infrastructure. Further, the sudden outbreak of COVID-19 is causing an adverse disruption on the overall economy and society, affecting the rate of gene therapy procedures and clinical trials, which is expected to negatively impact the growth of the global gene therapy market during the forecasted period.

Scope of the report:

Key Topics Covered:

1. Market Overview

2. Impact of COVID-192.1 Economic Impact2.2 Decline in Global GDP2.3 Decline in Industrial Production2.4 Impact on Gene Therapy2.5 Impact on Clinical Trials of Gene Therapy

3. Global Market Analysis3.1 Global Gene Therapy Market by Value3.2 Global Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.3 Global Gene Therapy Market by Cell Type3.3.1 Global Somatic Cell Gene Therapy Market by Value3.3.2 Global Somatic Cell Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.3.3 Global Germ Cell Gene Therapy Market by Value3.3.4 Global Germ Cell Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.4 Global Gene Therapy Market by Vector Type3.4.1 Global Retrovirus & Gammaretrovirus Gene Therapy Market by Value3.4.2 Global Retrovirus & Gammaretrovirus Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.4.3 Global Adeno-Associated Viruses Gene Therapy Market by Value3.4.4 Global Adeno-Associated Viruses Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.4.5 Global Lentivirus Gene Therapy Market by Value 3.4.6 Global Lentivirus Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.4.7 Global Adenovirus Gene Therapy Market by Value3.4.8 Global Adenovirus Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.4.9 Global Modified Herpes Simplex Virus Gene Therapy Market by Value 3.4.10 Global Modified Herpes Simplex Virus Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.4.11 Global Non-Viral Plasmid Vector Gene Therapy Market by Value3.4.12 Global Non-Viral Plasmid Vector Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.5 Global Gene Therapy Market by Application3.5.1 Global Oncological Disorders Gene Therapy Market by Value3.5.2 Global Oncological Disorders Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.5.3 Global Neurological Disorders Gene Therapy Market by Value3.5.4 Global Neurological Disorders Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.5.5 Global Infectious Disease Gene Therapy Market by Value3.5.6 Global Infectious Disease Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.5.7 Global Cardiovascular Diseases Gene Therapy Market by Value3.5.8 Global Cardiovascular Diseases Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.5.9 Global Rare Diseases Gene Therapy Market by Value 3.5.10 Global Rare Diseases Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.6 Global Gene Therapy Market by End-User3.6.1 Global Hospitals & Clinics Gene Therapy Market by Value3.6.2 Global Hospitals & Clinics Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.6.3 Global Specialty Treatment Centers Gene Therapy Market by Value3.6.4 Global Specialty Treatment Centers Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value3.7 Global Gene Therapy Market by Region

4. Regional Market Analysis4.1 North America4.1.1 North America Gene Therapy Market by Value4.1.2 North America Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.2 Europe4.2.1 Europe Gene Therapy Market by Value4.2.2 Europe Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.2.3 Europe Gene Therapy Market by Indication4.2.4 Europe Large B-Cell Lymphoma Gene Therapy Market by Value4.2.5 Europe Large B-Cell Lymphoma Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.2.6 Europe Inherited Retinal Disease Gene Therapy Market by Value4.2.7 Europe Inherited Retinal Disease Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.2.8 Europe ADA-SCID Gene Therapy Market by Value4.2.9 Europe ADA-SCID Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.2.10 Europe Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Gene Therapy Market by Value4.2.11 Europe Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.3 Asia Pacific4.3.1 Asia Pacific Gene Therapy Market by Value4.3.2 Asia Pacific Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value4.4 RoW4.4.1 RoW Gene Therapy Market by Value4.4.2 RoW Gene Therapy Market Forecast by Value

5. Market Dynamics5.1 Growth Drivers5.1.1 Increasing Prevalence of Chronic Diseases5.1.2 Rising Healthcare Expenditure5.1.3 Expanding Urbanization 5.1.4 Growth of Gene Therapy Clinical Trials5.1.5 Upsurge in Economic Growth5.2 Key Trends and Developments5.2.1 Rapid Adoption of Personalized Medicines5.2.2 Growing Occurrence of Genetic Disorders5.2.3 Advancements in Gene Therapy5.2.4 Increasing R&D Funding5.3 Challenges5.3.1 Side Effects of Gene Therapy5.3.2 Ethical and Safety Concerns5.3.3 High Cost of Treatment

6. Competitive Landscape6.1 Global Market6.1.1 Revenue Comparison of Key Players6.1.2 Market Capitalization Comparison of Key Players6.1.3 R&D Comparison of Key Players

7. Company Profiles7.1 Roche Holding AG7.1.1 Business Overview7.1.2 Financial Overview7.1.3 Business Strategies7.2 Pfizer Inc.7.2.1 Business Overview7.2.2 Financial Overview7.2.3 Business Strategies7.3 Novartis International AG7.3.1 Business Overview7.3.2 Financial Overview7.3.3 Business Strategies7.4 GlaxoSmithKline PLC7.4.1 Business Overview7.4.2 Financial Overview7.4.3 Business Strategies7.5 Bristol Myers Squibb Co. (Celgene Corporation)7.5.1 Business Overview7.5.2 Financial Overview7.5.3 Business Strategies7.6 Gilead Sciences, Inc.7.6.1 Business Overview7.6.2 Financial Overview7.6.3 Business Strategies

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/gjuirj

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Read the original:
Outlook on the Worldwide Gene Therapy Industry to 2024 - Insights & Forecast with Potential Impact of COVID-19 - GlobeNewswire

Read More...

Could gene therapy stem the damage of Parkinson’s? – Health24

Monday, August 24th, 2020

It may be possible to protect Parkinson's patients' brains from further damage by turning off a "master regulator" gene, researchers report.

"One of the biggest challenges in treating Parkinson's, other than the lack of therapies that impede disease progression, is that the disease has already laid waste to significant portions of the brain by the time it is diagnosed," said researcher Viviane Labrie, an associate professor at the Van Andel Institute, in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

"If we can find a way to protect critical brain cells from Parkinson's-related damage early on, we could potentially delay or even prevent symptom onset," she suggested in an institute news release.

Deadly for brain cells

Labrie and her colleagues compared the brains of Parkinson's patients and people without the neurodegenerative disease and found that a master regulator gene called TET2 was overactive in the brains of those with Parkinson's. That resulted in a heightened immune response and reactivation of the cell cycle.

While restarting the cell cycle is normal for many types of cells, it's deadly for brain cells, the study authors explained.

The researchers also found that reducing TET2 activity in mouse brains protects brain cells from inflammatory damage and the resulting neurodegeneration seen in Parkinson's disease patients.

These and other findings suggest that lowering TET2 activity could provide a new way to preserve brain cells in Parkinson's patients, according to the authors of the study published in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

A complex disease

For example, reducing TET2 activity might be used after a patient has a major inflammatory event, such as an infection, to relieve residual inflammation without interfering with its normal, healthy role in the body.

"Parkinson's is a complex disease with a range of triggers. Temporarily reducing TET2 activity could be one way to interfere with multiple contributors to the disease, especially inflammatory events, and protect the brain from loss of dopamine-producing cells," Labrie said.

"More work is needed before a TET2-based intervention can be developed, but it is a new and a promising avenue that we already are exploring," she concluded.

Image credit: iStock

Excerpt from:
Could gene therapy stem the damage of Parkinson's? - Health24

Read More...

Wary hemophilia patients are willing to wait longer for a safe gene therapy – STAT

Monday, August 24th, 2020

The Food and Drug Administrations rejection of a gene therapy for hemophilia A on Wednesday surprised many hematology researchers and Wall Street watchers who expected speedy approval for the one-time treatment to end the inherited bleeding disorder.

For one family in Indianapolis active in the hemophilia patient community, the decision was disappointing, but also appreciated.

Its a sad day because for a lot of people, they were ready to go, Michelle Rice, whose two sons have severe forms of hemophilia A, told STAT. But its also a good day, said Rice, who has a mild case of the disease and serves as chief external affairs officer for the National Hemophilia Foundation, because I think this community has fought long and hard for safety to be a priority.

advertisement

Hemophilia A is a genetic disorder in which the body fails to produce a protein called Factor VIII that is crucial for blood clotting. It affects about 20,000 people in the U.S., almost all men. The bleeding episodes and joint damage it causes are kept under control by frequent infusions costing about $300,000 per year.

BioMarins gene therapy, called Roctavian, is designed to fix that inherited defect, but the therapys impact on Factor VIII levels seems to wane over time. A year after treatment, patients in BioMarins clinical trial had Factor VIII levels of 64.3 international units per deciliter on average. After two years, that number fell by more than half. Four years after treatment, the average was 24.2 IU/dL, a 63% decline from the first year.

advertisement

The FDA has asked for two more years of data to better establish the durability of the gene therapy. That means the one-time treatment, if approved, will be delayed until at least 2022.

Roctavian is one of three gene therapies for hemophilia A now being developed. Roche, which acquired Spark Therapeutics gene therapy program when it bought the biotech earlier this year, and the partnership of Pfizer and Sangamo Therapeutics are at work on similar one-time therapies. Each is a year or more away from filing for FDA approval.

Len Valentino, CEO of the National Hemophilia Foundation, applauded the FDAs push for more durability data. He is a hematologist and former vice president, strategy lead in hematology, at Spark.

I think its good for the patient community because we need to protect our patients at all costs, he said. This is a community thats been through a tremendous amount of grief in the past with first HIV and AIDS and then hepatitis C. So I think protecting our community is of the utmost importance. And at this point, theres just too many unknowns that we dont understand the answers to.

In the 1970s and 1980s, about half of all people with hemophilia became infected with HIV after being transfused with contaminated blood products. Many patients with severe hemophilia developed AIDS, and thousands died. Infection with hepatitis C was also common when patients relied on infusions of clotting factors from human plasma, before the availability of recombinant factor VIII and IX made their treatments safer.

In the 80s, our population was decimated by HIV. Then in the late 80s, early 90s, a lot of them got hepatitis C, Rice said. My older son was one of them.

The more than a dozen products now available are safer, she said, and the treatments have made a huge difference for her older son, now 30, preventing the bleeding episodes that used to mean he was in the hospital every 7 to 10 days. Her younger son, who is 25, has fared better. Spontaneous bleeds are rare and prophylactic infusions several times a week have become as routine as brushing your teeth, Rice said.

Right now, were comfortable with where we are, she said. Were comfortable with the way our bodies feel.

Valentino called current therapies to treat hemophilia good, safe, and effective. At this point, the unmet medical need for hemophilia A is not great because I think the standard of care is quite good at this point.

There are two other sticking points for Rice and her sons, who arent pinning their hopes on any gene therapy: It doesnt change the genes you pass down to your children. And she wonders how long its benefits will last.

Everybody wants to see gene therapy. I can tell you that from the time my oldest was born, I was hearing gene therapy is going to be here in 10 years, she said. Its not that people in the community are not excited about it. I think they very much are excited about it. I feel like were probably closer than weve ever been getting here. And my kids have said were not going to rule it out forever.

Follow this link:
Wary hemophilia patients are willing to wait longer for a safe gene therapy - STAT

Read More...

A gene therapy for inherited blindness using dCas9-VPRmediated transcriptional activation – Science Advances

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Abstract

Catalytically inactive dCas9 fused to transcriptional activators (dCas9-VPR) enables activation of silent genes. Many disease genes have counterparts, which serve similar functions but are expressed in distinct cell types. One attractive option to compensate for the missing function of a defective gene could be to transcriptionally activate its functionally equivalent counterpart via dCas9-VPR. Key challenges of this approach include the delivery of dCas9-VPR, activation efficiency, long-term expression of the target gene, and adverse effects in vivo. Using dual adeno-associated viral vectors expressing split dCas9-VPR, we show efficient transcriptional activation and long-term expression of cone photoreceptor-specific M-opsin (Opn1mw) in a rhodopsin-deficient mouse model for retinitis pigmentosa. One year after treatment, this approach yields improved retinal function and attenuated retinal degeneration with no apparent adverse effects. Our study demonstrates that dCas9-VPRmediated transcriptional activation of functionally equivalent genes has great potential for the treatment of genetic disorders.

Various inherited disorders are caused by mutations in genes for which counterparts with similar function but distinct expression pattern exist. CRISPR-Casmediated transcriptional activation (transactivation) of such functionally equivalent genes is one attractive therapeutic strategy to compensate for the function of their mutant counterparts. Different transcriptional activators have been fused to catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) proteins and evaluated regarding their transactivation efficiency. Among the tested candidates, the catalytically inactive dCas9 fused to transcriptional activators (dCas9-VPR) transactivating module shows high efficiency across different species and cell types (1). However, because of its size (5.8 kb), dCas9-VPR exceeds the genome packaging capacity of recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors, which are currently the gold standard for gene delivery to native tissues and for gene therapy. A previous study provided a proof of principle for reconstitution of split dCas9-VPR using dual rAAVs in vitro and in vivo in wild-type (WT) mice (2). Nonetheless, the therapeutic potential of this tool has not been evaluated in disease models so far. In particular, the long-term effects, such as efficiency and expression of the transactivated gene as well as the potential adverse effects, remained largely unexplored.

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) affect several million people worldwide. Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common IRD subtype and primarily affects rod photoreceptors (3). By contrast, achromatopsia (ACHM) is among the most frequent IRDs affecting the cones (4). Many genes associated with RP or ACHM encode members of the phototransduction cascade in rods or cones. The key phototransduction molecules in these cells are encoded by distinct yet functionally equivalent genes, and mutations in many of these genes, such as the visual pigments (opsins) or cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) ion channels, are associated with different types of blinding disorders. Mutations in the rhodopsin gene (RHO) are the leading cause for RP, whereas mutations in the cone CNG channel genes (CNGA3 and CNGB3) are the most frequent cause for ACHM. While rods only express rhodopsin, most mammals including mice express two opsin types in cones, the short wavelengthsensitive S-opsin (Opn1sw) and the medium wavelengthsensitive M-opsin (Opn1mw). CNG channels are heterotetrameric complexes composed of the channel function defining CNG A and the modulatory CNG B subunit. The native rod CNG channels contain CNGA1 and CNGB1 and their cone counterparts CNGA3 and CNGB3 subunits, respectively. A previous study has shown that rod and cone CNG A subunits can also form functional units with the CNG B subunits from the other photoreceptor type, i.e., CNGA1 with CNGB3 and CNGA3 with CNGB1 (5). Given the functional similarity between native and chimeric CNG channels, activation of the respective functionally equivalent gene in rods or cones appears an attractive treatment option. Recent work on mouse models has shown that rhodopsin and cone opsins are also functionally equivalent (69). This suggests that activation of genes encoding for cone opsins in rods could compensate for the defective rhodopsin in the respective animal models.

Here, using dCas9-VPR, we were able to efficiently transactivate the Rho homolog Opn1mw and the rod-specific Cnga3 homolog Cnga1 in vitro. Using a dual rAAV vector system for split dCas9-VPRmediated Opn1mw activation in a rhodopsin-deficient mouse model for RP, we also demonstrate that this treatment results in safe and efficient long-term expression, gain in retinal function, and delay of retinal degeneration.

To test for the feasibility and efficiency of ectopic activation of nonexpressed or poorly expressed genes, we transfected different mouse cell lines with dCas9-VPR in combination with single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) binding to the promoter region of either murine Cnga1 or Opn1mw (Fig. 1A). As the transactivation efficiency can be increased with a growing number of sgRNAs (1), we used a combination of three sgRNAs for each of the genes. Transactivation of Cnga1 was addressed in 661W cells, immortalized derivatives of murine cones lacking Cnga1 expression (10). As 661W cells express Opn1mw endogenously, we used mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells for transactivation of this gene.

(A) Binding position of the three sgRNAs used for targeting dCas9-VPR to the promoter of the Cnga1 or Opn1mw gene, respectively. The relative distance of each sgRNA to the transcription start site (TSS) of the target gene is given in base pairs. (B) Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from 661W cells cotransfected with dCas9-VPR and either Cnga1 or lacZ sgRNAs. Cnga1 expression was normalized to the lacZ control. (C) qRT-PCR from MEF cells cotransfected with dCas9-VPR and either Opn1mw or lacZ sgRNAs. Opn1mw expression was normalized to the lacZ control. A two-tailed unpaired t test with Welchs correction was used for statistical analysis in (B) and (C). (D to G) qRT-PCR from 661W-pb (D and E) or MEF-pb cells (F and G) cultured at different doxycycline (DOX) concentrations as indicated. Cnga1 expression was normalized to DOX (500 ng/ml), and Opn1mw and dCas9-VPR expression was normalized to DOX (0 ng/ml).

In 661W cells transiently cotransfected with the dCas9-VPR cassette and Cnga1-specific sgRNAs, we observed efficient transactivation of Cnga1 on the transcript level, which was absent in control cells expressing the lacZ sgRNA (Fig. 1B and fig. S1A). Nevertheless, no Cnga1 protein signal was detectable in cells labeled with a specific antibody under these conditions.

When addressing the Opn1mw transactivation in MEF cells, we detected Opn1mw transcript in both nave and in lacZ sgRNAexpressing cells, indicating endogenous expression of Opn1mw in this cell line (fig. S1B). The efficiency of dCas9-mediated transactivation is known to correlate negatively with the basal expression level of a given gene (1). Nevertheless, despite the basal Opn1mw expression, a robust transactivation of Opn1mw was detectable in MEF cells coexpressing dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs (Fig. 1C and fig. S1B). A combination of another set of three Opn1mw sgRNAs could not further improve the transactivation efficiency (fig. S1, C and D). These results show that, in transiently transfected cells, both Cnga1 and Opn1mw can be efficiently transactivated using dCas9-VPR.

Next, we analyzed whether Cnga1 protein can be detected in a transfection-independent system. For this, we created 661W and MEF cell lines with stable integration of expression cassettes for doxycycline (DOX)inducible dCas9-VPR in combination with Cnga1, Opn1mw, or lacZ-specific sgRNAs [661WpiggyBac (pb) and MEF-pb, respectively]. When analyzing the Cnga1 transcript in the 661W cells, we detected a DOX concentrationdependent transactivation of this gene. However, robust Cnga1 transactivation was also present in the absence of DOX, suggesting a leaky activity of the DOX-dependent promoter driving dCas9-VPR expression. Moreover, an increase in Cnga1 expression was only obtained for the lowest DOX concentration (5 ng/ml), whereas Cnga1 levels were decreasing with further increase in drug concentration (Fig. 1D). Thus, when exceeding the optimal DOX concentration, there was an inverse correlation between dCas9-VPR transcript levels and the efficiency of Cnga1 transactivation (Fig. 1E). Very similar results were obtained in MEF cells stably expressing the dCas9-VPR cassette and Opn1mw sgRNAs, indicating that this effect was gene independent (Fig. 1, F and G). In contrast to Cnga1, there was no apparent Opn1mw transactivation in MEFs stably expressing dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs in the absence of DOX, which is most likely due to the endogenous basal expression of this gene in this cell line.

In summary, these results suggest that an optimal window for transactivation exists in which sufficient levels of dCas9-VPR protein support maximal levels of gene expression. Upon exceeding the optimal dCas9-VPR levels, there is a gradual decrease in transactivation efficiency.

Next, we assessed the Cnga1 and M-opsin protein expression in the corresponding stable cell lines treated with the optimal DOX concentration. Under these conditions, no evident increase in M-opsin protein expression was detectable when compared to the control cells (fig. S1E). For Cnga1, however, we could detect a robust signal that was absent in the lacZ sgRNAexpressing 661W cell line (Fig. 2A). To address whether functional channels can be formed from the proteins expressed from the transactivated Cnga1 locus, we conducted electrophysiological recordings in 661W cells cultured under optimal DOX concentration. In contrast to the lacZ control cell line lacking any CNG channel-like responses, several Cnga1 channelspecific characteristics including guanosine 3,5-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) sensitivity, calcium, and magnesium blockage and outward rectification could be measured upon transactivation of this gene (Fig. 2, B to D). This indicates that successful transactivation by dCas9-VPR can lead to fully functional Cnga1 channels.

(A) Immunostainings of 661W-pb cells stably expressing dCas9-VPR and lacZ- (sglacZ, top row) or Cnga1-specific sgRNAs (sgCnga1, bottom row) in the presence of DOX (5 ng/ml) using Cas9- and Cnga1-specific antibodies. Scale bar, 30 m. (B) Representative current traces recorded from inside out patches of DOX-induced 661W-pb cells in the presence of 300 M cGMP (left, ICNG) or cGMP and Ca2+/Mg2+ (right, Iblock). (C) Quantification of the cGMP-induced currents in the absence (ICNG) or presence of Ca2+/Mg2+ (Iblock) (unpaired t test with Welchs correction, two-tailed). (D) Current-voltage plot of cGMP-induced currents from sgCnga1 or sglacZ membrane patches.

Owing to the limited genome packaging capacity of rAAVs, the entire dCas9-VPR cassette cannot be packaged into a single rAAV vector for in vivo delivery. To circumvent this limitation, two recent studies took advantage of the split intein technology to reconstitute (d)Cas9-VPR or its derivatives at the protein level upon codelivery of two separate dual rAAVs, each of which expressing one half of the split SpCas9 cassette (2, 11). The split intein-mediated reconstitution efficiency is known to depend on the position of the intein integration within the corresponding protein (12). The aforementioned studies addressed the transactivation of (d)Cas9-VP(R) split either after the amino acid position E573 (11) or V713 (fig. S1F) (2). Nevertheless, to our best knowledge, no quantitative or comparative data with respect to the reconstitution efficiency resulting from these two approaches are available so far. As such data would be very helpful to achieve optimal results in vivo, we first set out to compare the reconstitution efficiency for both approaches side-by-side at the protein level. To this end, we transiently cotransfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells with plasmids encoding the SpCas9 halves intersected after the E573 or V713 position (fig. S1G) and quantified the resulting reconstitution efficiency. We found that the reconstitution efficiency of the SpCas9 variant split after V713 (56.9 2.1%) was considerably higher than its counterpart split after the E573 position (33.3 2.1%) (fig. S1H).

Next, we examined whether the coexpression of split dCas9-V713-VPR fragments also leads to efficient transactivation of Cnga1 and Opn1mw in the respective cells. While the transactivation efficiency for both target genes originating from the split dCas9-VPR was lower than from full-length dCas9-VPR, it still appeared robust and high enough in relation to the respective controls (fig. S1, I and J). Together, we show that dCas9-VPR split after the V713 position can transactivate both Cnga1 and Opn1mw in cell culture experiments and was therefore used for the subsequent in vivo experiments.

We next focused on activation of Opn1mw in rod photoreceptors to provide an in vivo proof of concept for transactivation of functionally equivalent genes using split dCas9-VPR dual AAVs. For this purpose, we coinjected titer-matched dual rAAVs expressing split dCas9-VPR under control of a human rhodopsin promoter and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs (Fig. 3A). Given the high percentage of rods, an activation of Opn1mw in this cell type is expected to superimpose the endogenous Opn1mw mRNA and protein signal originating from the more sparse cones, which make up only 3% of the total photoreceptor population in mice. For initial experiments, we used WT (+/+) animals subretinally injected on postnatal day 28 (P28) with split dCas9-VPR dual rAAVs. Four weeks after injection, a robust increase in Opn1mw transcript levels was observed in eyes coinjected with dual rAAVs compared to saline-injected eyes (Fig. 3B). This up-regulation of Opn1mw transcript was also confirmed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) (fig. S2A). Moreover, we could detect a strong M-opsin signal using an M-opsinspecific antibody in rod photoreceptor outer segments (Fig. 3C). This rod photoreceptorspecific expression of M-opsin was absent in untreated retinas, which only show M-opsin signal in cone photoreceptors (Fig. 3D). Encouraged by this finding, we addressed whether S-opsin (Opn1sw), another Rho homolog and potential candidate for transactivation in rhodopsin-deficient mice, can also be transactivated in rods using the same approach. Akin to Opn1mw, in retinas expressing split dCas9-VPR dual rAAVs and Opn1sw-specific sgRNAs, we could also detect S-Opsin protein in rod outer segments (Fig. 3, E and F). Notably, there was an evident variability in protein expression of transactivated M-Opsin and S-Opsin from experiment to experiment (fig. S2, B to E).

(A) Scheme of split dCas9-VPR and sgRNA encoding dual rAAV vectors used for transactivation of Opn1mw (B to D) and Opn1sw (E and F) in C57Bl/6J WT (+/+) mice. (B) qRT-PCR for Opn1mw expression upon transactivation 4 weeks after injection (Opn1mw-ta). The expression was normalized to control eyes injected with NaCl solution (saline, n = 6 eyes, paired t test, two-tailed). (C to F) Immunolabeling of two +/+ mice injected with Opn1mw- (C) or Opn1sw-transactivating dual AAVs (E). The contralateral eyes (D and F) of both mice served as control (untreated) (D and F). Peanut agglutinin (PNA; magenta) was used as marker for cones. Scale bars, 30 m.

Next, we also tested whether Opn1mw transactivation is sufficient to ameliorate the RP phenotype in the heterozygous rhodopsin-deficient (Rho+/) RP mouse model (13). In contrast to Rho/ mice, which completely lack rod outer segments from birth, heterozygous mice are capable of developing shortened but functional outer segments (13, 14), which is expected to be an important prerequisite for treatments requiring injections at later time points. Rho+/ mice were subretinally injected on P14 with titer-matched dual rAAV vectors expressing the split dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw sgRNAs. The contralateral control eye was injected with a NaCl (saline) solution. As Rho+/ mice show a slow course of retinal degeneration (13), we assessed the effects of our treatment 1 year after injection. Retinal degeneration is accompanied by a reduction of photoreceptors, a condition that can be addressed noninvasively by optical coherence tomography (OCT) measuring the thickness of the outer nuclear layer (ONL). OCT recordings from eyes expressing split dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw sgRNAs revealed an increase in the ONL thickness compared to the contralateral saline-injected eye, suggesting that our treatment is capable of delaying the degeneration (Fig. 4A and fig. S2F). Similar results were obtained when comparing the ONL thickness between treated and saline-injected eyes using an independent method based on histological analysis of retinal cryosections (fig. S2G).

(A) OCT measurements from Rho+/ mice injected with a NaCl solution (+/ saline, n = 10 eyes) or dual rAAVs expressing split dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs (+/ treated, n = 10 eyes). Age-matched C57Bl/6J WT mice (+/+, n = 14 eyes) were used as controls. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukeys post hoc test. (B and C) Averaged photopic and scotopic traces of the same Rho+/ and WT mice at 10 cd.s/m2. (D and E) Quantification of light-adapted photopic a- and b-wave amplitudes of the same groups. (F and G) Dark-adapted scotopic a- and b-wave amplitudes of the same groups plotted against different light intensities. All P values for each comparison (+/ treated versus +/ saline, +/ treated versus +/+, and +/ saline versus +/+) are shown in fig. S5E.

To assess beneficial effects of our approach on rod-mediated (scotopic) and cone-mediated (photopic) retinal function, electroretinography (ERG) measurements were performed in dark- and light-adapted Rho+/ mice, respectively (Fig. 4, B to G, and figs. S3 and S4). The associated statistical analysis has been conducted in two different ways: (i) We performed a multiple comparison test to compare the ERG amplitudes at the different light intensities of all three groups (WT and treated or saline-injected Rho+/ mice; Fig. 4), and (ii) we made a paired comparison of ERG amplitudes between treated and saline-injected eyes only (fig. S5).

In light-adapted animals, an increase in the a-wave amplitude of dual rAAVinjected eyes at the highest light flash intensity was achieved compared to saline-injected eyes and untreated WT animals (Fig. 4D). Moreover, when performing a pairwise comparison of the treated eyes to the corresponding saline-injected counterparts only, an increase in photopic a-wave amplitudes could be observed for the two highest flash intensities (fig. S5A). This suggests that under these conditions, M-opsin expressing rods might respond to cone-activating intensities. A slight tendential improvement was also detectable in the photopic b-wave amplitudes in treated eyes at the highest flash intensity (Fig. 4E and fig. S5B). When addressing the rod-mediated function in dark-adapted animals, we could measure a slight tendency for improvement of the scotopic a-wave toward WT-like responses (Fig. 4F and fig. S5C). In comparison, a robust trend toward an improvement of the scotopic b-wave was observed when comparing the treated eyes to their saline-injected counterparts (Fig. 4G and fig. S5D). This trend was more pronounced with increasing light intensities, further supporting the assumption that treated rods expressing M-opsin are capable of responding to cone-activating stimuli. The individual P values for all ERG measurements shown in Fig. 4 are summarized in fig. S5E. Conclusively, these data suggest that Opn1mw transactivation can ameliorate retinal degeneration and results in partially improved retinal function in the Rho+/ RP mouse model.

In another set of experiments, we also analyzed the expression of M-opsin protein and markers for potential gliosis, apoptosis, or immune response in the retinas of the mice used for OCT and ERG measurements. Analogous to the results obtained in WT mice (cf. Fig. 3C and fig. S2), we found a considerable expression of transactivated M-opsin in the rod outer segments of injected animals, which, however, varied between animals (Fig. 5, A and B, and figs. S6 and S7). Furthermore, to assess the translational potential of this approach, we examined whether our treatment induced persistent gliosis or immune responses, which would be accompanied by proliferation of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)positive Mller glia or ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1)positive microglial or mononuclear cells in the retina. Immune labeling of the retinas with these markers revealed no obvious increase in the number of glial, microglial, or mononuclear cells between the different groups in contrast to retinas of rd1 (retinal degeneration 1) mice exhibiting a fast retinal degeneration peaking on P13 (Fig. 5, C to H, and fig. S8) (15). To investigate whether photoreceptor degeneration is caused by apoptosis in the Rho+/ mouse model, we conducted a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay on retinal sections from the treated Rho+/ mice (Fig. 6, A and B). In this assay, we could detect a low but considerable number of TUNEL-positive cells, indicating that apoptosis is the underlying mechanism for the photoreceptor loss in this mouse model. Moreover, by comparing the number of TUNEL-positive cells per area in the transduced versus untransduced part of the treated retinas, we show that Opn1mw transactivation reduces apoptosis (Fig. 6C). These data further emphasize the beneficial effects of our treatment on photoreceptor survival.

(A and B) Representative immunostainings of retinas from Rho+/ mouse #1 injected with either split dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs (A) (treated) or NaCl (B) (saline, contralateral eye). Peripherin-2 antibody (PRPH2, cyan) was used as rod and cone outer segment marker and PNA (magenta) as marker for cones. (C to F) Immunolabeling of the same retinas with Iba1 or GFAP (cyan) to visualize microglial cells or reactive gliosis in the treated (C and E) and saline-injected contralateral eye (D and F). (G and H) Immunolabeling of retinas from Pde6b-deficient (rd1) mice on P13 with Iba1 (G, cyan) or GFAP (H, cyan) served as a positive control. Scale bars, 30 m.

(A) Representative sections of the immunolabeled retina from Rho+/ mouse #1 injected with split dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs showing a transduced (left) or untransduced (right) area of the same retina 1 year after injection. (B) Immunolabeling of the rd1 mouse retina on P13 served as a positive control. TUNEL staining (magenta, top) was used to visualize apoptosis, PRPH2 (cyan) was used as rod and cone outer segment marker (bottom). Scale bar, 30 m. (C) Quantification of TUNEL+ cells in transduced versus untransduced areas of retinas from eight Rho+/ mice injected with split dCas9-VPR and Opn1mw-specific sgRNAs. A paired t test (two-tailed) was used for statistical analysis.

The interpretation of the results obtained so far was largely based on the comparison of the treated Rho+/ mice to the saline-injected contralateral eye. To address whether the injection of saline might induce some effects on its own, we characterized the retinal degeneration and function, reactive gliosis, recruitment of immune reactive cells, and apoptosis in age-matched (1-year-old) untreated Rho+/ mice and compared these parameters side by side to those obtained from saline-injected control eyes. Except for a very slight decrease in the photopic b-wave amplitude at one single light flash intensity (0.1 cd.s/m2) upon saline injection, there were no noticeable differences in any of these parameters between the two groups (fig. S9). The injection of the saline solution thus most likely does not affect the interpretation of our results and the treatment success.

In this study, we provide the first evidence that ectopic transcriptional activation of functionally equivalent genes using split dCas9-VPR can ameliorate a disease phenotype, further expanding the spectrum of possibilities for treatment of genetic disorders. Given that many IRD-linked genes expressed in rods or cones are encoded by functionally equivalent genes, the transactivation approach provides an attractive option for therapy of these diseases for several reasons: (i) Transactivation of functionally equivalent genes can be used for the treatment of large and frequent IRD genes, such as ABCA4 or MYO7A, which cannot be efficiently reconstituted using classical dual AAV vectors. ABCA4 and MYO7A belong each to a large protein family with many functionally equivalent partners expressed across different cell types. Some of these partners, e.g., ABCA1 or MYO7B, show a very high structural conservation to ABCA4 and MYO7A, respectively, with at least 50% amino acid identity and 65% amino acid similarity and therefore represent highly attractive candidates for transactivation. (ii) A transactivation approach can also be used for therapy of genes with autosomal dominant inheritance, for which gene delivery has to be combined with simultaneous knockout of the diseased allele. Recent studies demonstrated that sgRNAs with shortened spacer lengths (<16 bases) repress the catalytic activity of Cas9-VPR (16, 17). A strategy combining catalytically active Cas9-VPR with sgRNAs of shortened spacer lengths for transactivation and with standard sgRNAs (usually 20 bases spacer length) for simultaneous down-regulation of the diseased gene can, e.g., be used for the treatment of the most common rhodopsin P23H gain-of-function mutation but should also be applicable to other mutations in RHO or to other genes with autosomal-dominant inheritance. (iii) Owing to the possibility of multiplexing in CRISPR-Cas approaches, transactivation could potentially also be used for the treatment of more complex (retinal) diseases, such as those caused by mutations in two or multiple genes (1820). (iv) The (d)Cas9-VPRmediated transactivation approach is mutation independent and thus allows for the treatment of a large number of patients.

Using alternative activation strategies, two recent studies demonstrated that CRISPR-Cas9based transactivation of structurally and functionally related genes can ameliorate the phenotypes of two different mouse models for muscular dystrophy (21, 22). Additional work is necessary to compare the transactivation efficiency, long-term effects, and safety between these approaches and dCas9-VPR side by side to determine the best treatment strategy for the individual disorders. It also remains to be investigated whether other split position within dCas9-VPR (23) or other technologies for reconstitution of large coding sequences might further improve the transactivation efficiency and/or the therapeutic outcome of dCas9-VPRbased approaches. Unlike its catalytically active counterpart, dCas9 and its fusion variants do not cause single or double strand breaks at the genomic level. Studies addressing the off-targets of dCas9-VPR at the transcript level revealed that such off-target rates are very low or nondetectable (1, 2), further emphasizing the therapeutic potential of this approach. We demonstrate herein that the split dCas9-VPR technology can induce long-term expression and morphological as well as functional phenotypic changes in an animal model with no apparent adverse effects, such as gliosis or invasion of immune cells. These promising results might therefore help pushing this approach toward first clinical trials. Notably, as in previous retinal gene therapy studies in mice, we could not fully rescue the WT-like retinal function or morphology. One possible reason is that a single subretinal injection with conventional rAAV capsids usually covers only up to one third of the retina, and hence, amplitudes of up to 30% of the WT response could be expected. We suggest that functional or structural improvements can be further increased by developing more potent rAAV vectors, which show pan-retinal expression upon subretinal injection (e.g., due to lateral spreading) or which allow for other more convenient administration routes (e.g., intravitreal injection). In addition, we use a dual rAAV vector approach that requires both vectors to be expressed and reconstituted in the same cell. Accordingly, one would benefit from more efficient dual rAAV vector strategies or techniques to increase the reconstitution efficiency of the split dCas9-VPR.

Last, we also provide the first in vitro evidence that transactivation efficiency is inversely correlated with dCas9-VPR expression in a transfection-independent system. It remains to be clarified whether this unexpected dose dependency of dCas9-VPR also occurs in vivo and whether it reflects an inherent property of other catalytically active and inactive Cas9 or other Cas variants. A precise understanding of this correlation could help to further improve and fine-tune the efficiency of these enzymes and might thus also increase the therapeutic outcome of CRISPR-Casbased approaches.

All animal procedures were performed with the permission of local authorities (District Government of Upper Bavaria) and in accordance with the German laws on animal welfare (Tierschutzgesetz). Animals were anesthetized via an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (40 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (20 mg/kg body weight). Euthanasia was performed by cervical dislocation. For all experiments, C57Bl/6J or Rho+/ mice (13) backcrossed to a C57Bl/6J background for at least eight generations were used.

The Eukaryotic Promoter Database (https://epd.epfl.ch//index.php) was consulted for the identification of promoter regions (24). sgRNA sequences in the genomic target region were chosen using the CRISPOR website with 20bp-NGG PAM settings for SpCas9 (25) and elimination of sgRNAs with a specificity score (26) lower than 50. All sgRNA sequences used in this study are shown in table S1.

The Cas9m4-VP64, SP-dCas9-VPR, pSMVP-Cas9N, pSMVP-Cas9C, and pAAV-CMV-Cas9C-VPR plasmids were obtained from Addgene (#47319, #63798, #80934, #80939, and #80933, respectively). sgRNAs expressed via a U6 promoter were added using standard cloning techniques. Cas9N and Cas9C were rendered catalytically inactive by introducing the D10A and the H840A point mutations via a standard site-directed mutagenesis protocol using the KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix PCR kit (Kapa Biosystems). For the generation of stable cell lines, dCas9-VPR was subcloned into a pb expression vector containing the Tet-On system for DOX-inducible expression of dCas9-VPR. For expression in mouse photoreceptors, the split dCas9-VPR driven by a human rhodopsin promoter and corresponding sgRNAs each driven by a human U6 promoter were subcloned into the pAAV2.1 vector (27). All transgenes were sequenced before use (Eurofins Genomics).

The murine 661W cell line derived from retinal tumors was provided by M. Al-Ubaidi, University of Houston (28). The cells were cultured in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM) GlutaMAX medium (ThermoFisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biochrom) and 1% Anti-Anti (ThermoFisher Scientific) at 37C and 10% CO2. Immortalized MEFs were generated as previously described (29, 30). MEF cells were cultured in DMEM GlutaMAX medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Biochrom) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom) at 37C and 5% CO2. Transient transfections of 661W and MEF cells were performed using the Xfect Transfection Reagent (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturers instructions. HEK293 cells were transfected using the standard calcium phosphate technique.

The stable cell lines were generated using the pb transposon system. Briefly, 661W or MEF cells were cotransfected with the respective dCas9-VPR and sgRNA containing pb vector and a pb transposase expression vector using the Xfect Transfection Reagent (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturers instructions. Fourty-eight to 72 hours after transfection, cells were selected for successful integration by addition of puromycin dihydrochloride (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for approximately 1 week at 4.5 and 1 g/ml concentration for 661W and MEF cells, respectively. To induce dCas9-VPR expression, DOX hyclate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added directly to the medium.

Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were harvested and lysed using the mixer mill MM400 (Retsch). RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturers instructions, and RNA concentration and purity were determined via the NanoDrop2000 (ThermoFisher Scientific). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturers instructions for up to 1 g of total RNA. For reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the Herculase II polymerase (Agilent Technologies) was used following the manufacturers instructions. The quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific) using the SYBR Select Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturers instructions. The relative expression levels of Cnga1 and Opn1mw were normalized to the housekeeping gene Alas and calculated using the 2-C(T) method. All primers used in this study can be found in table S1.

Total RNA was isolated from retinas using the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturers protocol. For mRNA library production, we used a scaled-up version of the SMARTseq2 protocol. Briefly, from ca. 7 to 90 ng of total RNA, mRNA was captured with a mix of 0.5 l of 20 M oligo dT primer and 0.5 l of 20 mM dNTPs, followed by heating to 72C for 3 min and immediately putting into ice-water bath. Then, in a 10-l reaction, double-stranded cDNA was generated by adding 2 l of 5 Superscript II first-strand buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific), 2 l of 5 M Betaine, 0.6 l of 100 mM MgCl2, 0.5 l of 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.4 l of RNAsin (Promega), 0.5 l of 20 M template-switch oligo (20 M), and 0.5 l of SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (200 U/l; ThermoFisher Scientific) and incubation for 90 min at 42C, followed by 14 cycles (50C for 2 min, 42C for 2 min) and heat inactivation (70C for 15 min). Pre-amplification was performed by addition of 12.5 l of 2 KAPA HiFi HotStart Ready mix, 0.25 l of 10 M IS PCR primers, and 2.25 l of nuclease-free water in a thermos protocol of 98C for 3 min, 10 pre-amplification cycles (98C for 20 s, 67C for 15 s, 72C for 6 min), followed by 5 min at 72C and hold at 4C. Purification was performed with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), and cDNA was quantified with Qubit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and checked for fragment length distribution on an Agilent Bioanalyzer chip. Next, 7 ng of cDNA was fragmented in a 20-l reaction by incubation with 1 l of Tn5 enzyme from Illumina Nextera library preparation kit and 10 l of 2 tagmentation DNA buffer for 10 min at 55C. Tagmented cDNA was purified with MinElute columns (QIAGEN) and PCR-amplified with NEBNext High-Fidelity 2 PCR Mastermix, 1 l of each 10 M Nextera index 1 and Nextera index 2 primer (Illumina) with a thermos protocol of 72C for 5 min, 98C for 30 s, 7 cycles (98C for 10 s, 63C for 30 s, and 72C for 1 min), 72C for 5 min, and hold at 4C. The final library was purified with AMPure beads, quantified by Qubit, and sequenced for 100 base pairs using a V3 single read flow cell on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). The generated data were trimmed for quality and adapter reads with TrimGalore! and then mapped with STAR aligner. Duplicates were marked with the MarkDuplicates function from Picard tools. Reads were summarized with RSEM (RNA-seq by expectation maximization) software, and FPM (fragments per million mapped fragments) count matrix was generated with DESeq2.

For immunocytochemistry, 661W-pb or MEF-pb cells were seeded onto sterile 12-mm-diameter cover slips coated with poly-l-lysine hydrobromide (Sigma-Aldrich). After 48 hours of DOX application, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) and permeabilized for 30 min in 0.3% Triton X-100. Next, the coverslips were incubated with blocking solution (5% ChemiBLOCKER, Merck Millipore). To stain for Cnga1 and SpCas9 in 661W-pb cells, an anti-Cnga1 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:30; gift from R. Molday) (31) and the anti-SpCas9 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000; C15310258, Diagenode) were used, respectively. To stain for M-opsin and SpCas9 in MEF-pb cells, the anti-opsin red/green (M-opsin) rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:300; AB5405, Merck) and an anti-SpCas9 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500; SAB4200751, Sigma-Aldrich) were used, respectively. Hoechst 33342 solution (5 g/ml; Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific) was used as a nuclear staining. Images were obtained via the Leica TCS SP8 spectral confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica), acquired with the LASX software (Leica), and further processed with the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).

Inside-out patches were excised from 661W stable cells that were maintained at a DOX concentration of 5 ng/ml. Currents were recorded using an EPC-10 double patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA Elektronik, Harvard Bioscience) and PatchMaster acquisition software (HEKA Elektronik, Harvard Bioscience). Data were digitized at 20 kHz and filtered at 2.9 kHz. All recordings were obtained at room temperature. The extracellular solution was composed of 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM Hepes, and 1 mM EGTA (pH 7.4). The intracellular solution contained 140 mM KCl, 5 mM NaCl, 10 mM Hepes, and 1 mM EGTA (pH 7.4). The effect of cGMP was examined by perfusing the patch with extracellular solution supplemented with 300 M cGMP. To investigate channel blocking, perfusion with a symmetric Ca2+/Mg2+ solution composed of 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM Hepes was performed, followed by perfusion with a cGMP-supplemented Ca2+/Mg2+ solution as a control. Currents were evoked from a holding potential of 0 mV by applying a 300-ms pulse of 80 mV followed by a 300-ms pulse of 80 mV every 3 s.

Transiently transfected HEK293 cells were harvested 48 hours after transfection and lysed in TX lysis buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, v/v) using the mixer mill MM400 (Retsch). The lysis buffer was supplemented with cOmplete ULTRA Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablets (Roche). For Western blotting, 30 g of the whole-cell protein was incubated in 1 Laemmli sample buffer supplemented with DTT at 72C for 10 min. The proteins were separated on a 6 to 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel via gel electrophoresis. For immunoblotting, the anti-SpCas9 antibody (1:1000; C15310258, Diagenode) was used. The relative band intensities were quantified using the ImageLab software (Bio-Rad).

rAAV vectors containing the N- or C-terminal part of dCas9-VPR and the sgRNA expression cassette were produced using the 2/8YF capsid (32) as described previously (33, 34). C57Bl/6J mice were injected subretinally at P28 with a single injection (1 l) of titer-matched rAAVs (total 1011 vg/l), and the retinas were harvested for immunohistochemistry 4 weeks after injection. For 10 Rho+/ mice, one eye was injected via a single injection (1 l) of titer-matched rAAVs (total 1011 vg/l) on P14. The contralateral eye was control injected with 1 l of NaCl (saline). Twelve months after injection, ERG and OCT were performed on both eyes of all Rho+/ mice, and all retinas were harvested for immunohistochemistry.

Corneal electroretinograms were recorded from 10 Rho+/ and 10 age-matched C57Bl/6J WT mice using the Celeris full-field ERG system from Diagnosys (model D430). Scotopic and photopic electroretinograms were carried out for each animal. Mice were dark adapted overnight, and scotopic ERG measurements were conducted first under dim red light conditions followed by photopic tests. Pupils were dilated using 1% atropine- and 0.5% tropicamide-containing eye drops (Mydriaticum Stulln, Pharma Stulln GmbH). As contact fluid, hydroxylpropyl methylcellulose (Methocel 2%, OmniVision GmbH) was applied on both eyes before placing the light guide electrodes. During the whole protocol, animals were kept warm by the integrated platform heater of the Celeris system. ERG responses were obtained simultaneously from both eyes. For scotopic measurements, single flash recordings were performed at light intensities of 0.003 (blue light, 455 nm), 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 cd.s/m2 (all remaining intensities 6500 K white light). Background intensity was 0 cd/m2. For photopic measurements, mice were light adapted (3 cd.s/m2) for 5 min, and single flash recordings were obtained at light intensities of 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 cd.s/m2. The background intensity for all photopic recordings was 9 cd/m2. For both, scotopic and photopic assessments, measurements were recorded from 50 ms before stimulus onset to 300 ms poststimulus. Voltage signals were sampled at 1 Hz, and recorded responses were averages of 5 (scotopic) or 10 (photopic) sweeps depending on signal-to-noise ratios. The measurements were analyzed using the provided Espion V6 software from Diagnosys with the a-wave amplitude measured from stimulus onset to the trough of the a-wave and the b-wave amplitude ranging from the trough of the a-wave to the peak of the b-wave.

Retinal morphology of the Rho+/ mice was assessed with OCT using an adapted Spectralis HRA + OCT system (Heidelberg Engineering) in combination with contact lenses as described previously (35). Pupils were dilated using 1% atropine- and 0.5% tropicamide-containing eye drops (Mydriaticum Stulln, Pharma Stulln GmbH), and hydroxylpropyl methylcellulose (Methocel 2%, OmniVision GmbH) was applied to keep the eyes moist. OCT scans (20 frames per retina) were performed in high-resolution mode with the scanner set to 30 field of view.

Retinas of 13-month-old injected Rho+/ and age-matched WT mice were dissected and processed for immunohistochemistry as described previously (36). The mouse monoclonal antiPRPH2 2B7 antibody (1:100; gift from M. Naash) (37) served as marker for rod and cone outer segments. The guinea pig anti-iba1 antibody (1:100; 234 004, Synaptic Systems) was used to visualize microglia. As marker for potential reactive gliosis served the mouse antiGFAP-Cy3 antibody (1:1000; C9205, Sigma-Aldrich). Fluorescein isothiocyanateconjugated lectin from Arachis hypogaea [peanut agglutinin (PNA)] (1:100; L7381, Sigma-Aldrich) was applied to stain cone photoreceptors. To detect cone-specific and activated M-opsin in rod photoreceptors, the rabbit anti-opsin red/green (M-opsin) antibody (1:300; AB5405, Merck) was used. The cell nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 solution. To detect apoptosis, the TUNEL assay was performed using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein (11684795910; Roche) according to the manufacturers instruction. The TUNEL assay was conducted for 8 of 10 injected Rho+/ mice except for mouse #7 and #8 (Fig. 6) as there were no cryosections left to stain from these two mice. Retinal images were obtained via the Leica TCS SP8 spectral confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica), acquired with the LASX software (Leica), and further processed with the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). Postmortem analysis of the ONL thickness in stained retinal sections was performed using the ImageJ software. Areas with equal distance to the optic nerve were chosen for analysis. At least three measurements were averaged per retina.

All values are given as means SEM. The number of replicates (n) and the used statistical tests are indicated in each figure legend for each experiment.

Acknowledgments: We thank B. Noack, J. Koch, and K. Skokann for excellent technical support. We also thank M. Naash for the gift of the peripherin-2 antibody and R. Molday for the gift of the CNGA1 antibody. Moreover, we want to thank M. Al-Ubaidi for the gift of the 661W cells. Funding: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SPP2127 (to E.B., M.B., and S.M.). K.J.V.N. was funded by the BMBF grant (031L0101D) for de.NBI and is currently hired by AstraZeneca. This work was also supported, in part, by German Research Foundation Grants SFB 870 B05. Author contributions: E.B. designed the study and supervised the project with input from S.M. and M.B. S.B. conducted the in vivo experiments including AAV preparation, subretinal injections, OCT, immunohistochemistry, and ERG experiments with contributions from V.S., L.M.R., J.E.W., and K.S.H. V.S. designed and generated the stable cell lines, performed immunocytochemistry, and the molecular biology experiments including sgRNA design, qRT-PCR, and statistical analyses with contributions from S.B. and L.M.R. R.D.R. performed and analyzed the patch-clamp measurements with contributions from C.W.-S. and S.F. G.G. performed the RNA-seq experiment and K.J.V.N. analyzed the RNA-seq data. E.B., V.S., S.B., and L.M.R. wrote the manuscript with contributions from S.M. and M.B. E.B., S.M., M.B., C.W.-S., and J.W. acquired funding. E.B., S.M., M.B., S.B., V.S., and L.M.R. analyzed and discussed the data with input from all authors. Competing interests: E.B., M.B., and S.M. are authors on a patent application related to this work (no. EP19198830, filed 23 September 2019). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Read more:
A gene therapy for inherited blindness using dCas9-VPRmediated transcriptional activation - Science Advances

Read More...

Baby Harper races to raise $2.8 million for gene therapy treatment | News – Daily Hive

Monday, August 24th, 2020

An Edmonton babys parents are trying to raise $2.8 million to pay for a gene therapy treatment to stop her rare neurodegenerative disorder before her second birthday.

Harper Hanki was diagnosed Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 in January 2020. Its a terminal genetic disorder that will see Harper gradually lose control of her muscular movements.

Shes very vocal. Happy all the time. Determined,her father John Hanki told Daily Hive.

Her disorder is the same one that two Metro Vancouver babies also have. Baby Lucy and baby Aryan made headlines earlier this summer as their families both successfully raised the nearly $3 million needed to import the lifesaving drug from the US.

The Hanki family is incredibly happy for those families, and hopes their own fundraising journey isnt old news.

The drug that will help Harper is called Zolgensma. Its one-time injection that will insert a working copy of Harpers defective gene, effectively stopping the degenerative disorder in its tracks.

But theres a catch: Zolgensma the most expensive drug in the world. The treatment is sold by Swiss drug-maker Novartis, and it isnt yet approved in Canada. That means its not covered by any provincial health plan, and families like the Hankis have to import the drug from the US through their local hospital.

Time is of the essence, because Zolgensma is only effective in children under two years old. Harper just turned one, and her parents hope to get the treatment as soon as possible.

So far, theyve raised $152,000 through their GoFundMe page.

Even though thats an absurd amount of money, its just hard to know that its not even close, Amanda Hanki, Harpers mother, told Daily Hive. For the circumstances, its unfortunately just a drop in the bucket.

So the family has produced a video telling Harpers story and asking for donations from friends, family, and complete strangers.

We know its possible You see the Oilers 50/50 get to $15 million in seven hours, were just thinking how do we get our hands on that, Amanda said.

For now, Harper is getting injections of Spinraza. Its a temporary solution that slows SMAs progress. As each injection wears off, John says its clear Harper is gradually losing motor function.

She cant really move like a one-year-old should, he said.

The Hankis are in talks with their local MLA to try and lobby Alberta Health Minister Tyler Shandro to include Zolgensma under the provinces public health coverage.

Although SMA is a rare disease, the Hankis know Harper wont be the last baby born with it.

Link:
Baby Harper races to raise $2.8 million for gene therapy treatment | News - Daily Hive

Read More...

Orchard Therapeutics Announces Clinical Data Presentations at the 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation…

Monday, August 24th, 2020

BOSTON and LONDON, Aug. 24, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Orchard Therapeutics (Nasdaq: ORTX), a global gene therapy leader, today announced presentations at the upcoming 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), taking place virtually from August 29 - September 1, 2020. New interim data from OTL-203, an investigational gene therapy for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS-I), will be shared as part of an invited oral presentation titled Gene Therapy in Leucodystrophies and Other Metabolic Disorders.

The presentations are listed below and the full preliminary program is available online at the EBMT Annual Meeting website. Presentations will be available to registered attendees for virtual viewing throughout the duration of the live meeting and content will be accessible online following the close of the meeting.

Invited Oral Presentation Details

E7-2: Gene Therapy in Leucodystrophies and Other Metabolic Disorders Session: Gene Therapy for Inherited Disorders 2020Presenter: M. Ester Bernardo, M.D., Ph.D., San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), ItalyDate and time: Monday, August 31, 2020, 4:50-5:10pm CET/10:50-11:10am ET

ePoster Details

Ex-vivo Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIA*Poster Session & Number: Gene Therapy; ePoster A214

Lentiviral Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Gene Therapy (HSPC-GT) For Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD): Clinical Outcomes From 33 PatientsPoster Session & Number: Gene Therapy; ePoster O075

About OrchardOrchard Therapeutics is a global gene therapy leader dedicated to transforming the lives of people affected by rare diseases through the development of innovative, potentially curative gene therapies. Our ex vivo autologous gene therapy approach harnesses the power of genetically modified blood stem cells and seeks to correct the underlying cause of disease in a single administration. In 2018, Orchard acquired GSKs rare disease gene therapy portfolio, which originated from a pioneering collaboration between GSK and the San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy in Milan, Italy. Orchard now has one of the deepest and most advanced gene therapy product candidate pipelines in the industry spanning multiple therapeutic areas where the disease burden on children, families and caregivers is immense and current treatment options are limited or do not exist.

Orchard has its global headquarters in London and U.S. headquarters in Boston. For more information, please visit http://www.orchard-tx.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.

Availability of Other Information About OrchardInvestors and others should note that Orchard communicates with its investors and the public using the company website (www.orchard-tx.com), the investor relations website (ir.orchard-tx.com), and on social media (Twitter and LinkedIn), including but not limited to investor presentations and investor fact sheets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. The information that Orchard posts on these channels and websites could be deemed to be material information. As a result, Orchard encourages investors, the media, and others interested in Orchard to review the information that is posted on these channels, including the investor relations website, on a regular basis. This list of channels may be updated from time to time on Orchards investor relations website and may include additional social media channels. The contents of Orchards website or these channels, or any other website that may be accessed from its website or these channels, shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains certain forward-looking statements about Orchards strategy, future plans and prospects, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include express or implied statements relating to, among other things, Orchards business strategy and goals, and the therapeutic potential of Orchards product candidates, including the product candidate or candidates referred to in this release. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Orchards control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements. In particular, these risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: the severity of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Orchards business, including on clinical development and commercial programs; the risk that any one or more of Orchards product candidates, including the product candidate or candidates referred to in this release, will not be approved, successfully developed or commercialized; the risk of cessation or delay of any of Orchards ongoing or planned clinical trials; the risk that Orchard may not successfully recruit or enroll a sufficient number of patients for its clinical trials; the risk that prior results, such as signals of safety, activity or durability of effect, observed from preclinical studies or clinical trials will not be replicated or will not continue in ongoing or future studies or trials involving Orchards product candidates; the delay of any of Orchards regulatory submissions; the failure to obtain marketing approval from the applicable regulatory authorities for any of Orchards product candidates or the receipt of restricted marketing approvals; and the risk of delays in Orchards ability to commercialize its product candidates, if approved. Given these uncertainties, the reader is advised not to place any undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Other risks and uncertainties faced by Orchard include those identified under the heading "Risk Factors" in Orchards quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as subsequent filings and reports filed with the SEC. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release reflect Orchards views as of the date hereof, and Orchard does not assume and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

*Patient was treated by the Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital (RMCH) under a Specials license, granted by the UK government for the use of an unlicensed pharmaceutical product in situations of high unmet need when there is no other treatment option available. Orchard holds the license to the MPS-IIIA investigational gene therapy product (OTL-201) and is funding the ongoing proof-of-concept clinical trial being conducted at RMCH, which utilizes the same technology and procedures that were used to treat this first MPS-IIIA patient.

Contacts

InvestorsRenee LeckDirector, Investor Relations+1 862-242-0764Renee.Leck@orchard-tx.com

MediaMolly CameronManager, Corporate Communications+1 978-339-3378media@orchard-tx.com

More here:
Orchard Therapeutics Announces Clinical Data Presentations at the 46th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation...

Read More...

Pipeline report: Alzheimer’s disease, from amyloid and tau to gene therapies and beyond – FierceBiotech

Monday, August 24th, 2020

With 40million people thought to suffer from dementia throughout the world and the number due to double in 20 years, theres no overstating the desperate need for drugs to slow down its progression.

And unfortunately, theres no overstating the amount of money spent in pursuit of an Alzheimers disease (AD) therapy that addresses its underlying processesto little practical effect so far.

Alzheimers accounts for the bulk of dementia cases, and for decades the only available treatments were drugs that try to restore neurotransmitter levels in the brain, which only affect symptoms and have modest effects at best. The last of those was approved 17 years ago.

Billions of research dollars have gone into discovering the underlying mechanisms in AD and seeking drugs that can disrupt the pathogenic steps that lead to the destruction of neurons, but its a hugely long and expensive process.

For many years, researchers have concentratedone might even say fixatedon the physical manifestations of AD visible in the brain, namely extracellular amyloid plaques and, more recently, intracellular tau protein tangles.

That has been a largely thankless task with well over 200 failed programs, many of which advanced to the costly phase 3 testing stage before being abandonedalthough one amyloid drug once left for dead was revived last year and submitted to the FDA this summer (more on that later).

Despite the attrition rate, amyloid-targeting drugs still account for 13 of 32 candidates in late-stage clinical trials in ADaround 40%just about the same percentage as the year prior, according to an analysis (PDF) from the Us Against Alzheimers organization presented at this years Alzheimers Association International Conference.

The remaining 19 are split among several other approaches, from tau-targeting attempts to a mixed bag of other drugs aimed at protecting neurons from degenerating and blocking inflammation and metabolic processes linked to dementia.

The shift from amyloid more apparent in the mid-stage pipeline, however, where nineof 58 programs are now targeting that protein and the rest are spread into other approaches. Fifteen, for instance, fall into the neurotransmission category, and just six are targeting tau.

The Alzheimers Drug Discovery Foundationis convinced that the answer to treating AD will lie in using multiple drugs in combination, or drugs with multiple effects in one molecule, reflecting the fact that it is an enormously complex disease with multiple causes and pathologies. Understanding AD is made even harder by the fact that the disease can be definitively diagnosed only post-mortem, by examining the brain.

Its also worth noting that many of the predictions and timelines in this article predate the coronavirus pandemic, so may be overly-ambitious if the disruption caused by COVID-19 extends for months more. Many of the readouts are due between now and 2022, so one things for suretherell be plenty of news in AD over the next couple of years.

The rest is here:
Pipeline report: Alzheimer's disease, from amyloid and tau to gene therapies and beyond - FierceBiotech

Read More...

Gene Therapy Market 2020 Industry Recent Developments, Size, Emerging Trends, Growth, Progression Status, Latest Technology, and Forecast Research…

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Impact Analysis of Covid-19

The complete version of the Report will include the impact of the COVID-19, and anticipated change on the future outlook of the industry, by taking into the account the political, economic, social, and technological parameters.

Gene Therapy market reports provides a comprehensive overview of the global market size and share. Gene Therapy market data reports also provide a 5 year pre-historic and forecast for the sector and include data on socio-economic data of global. Key stakeholders can consider statistics, tables & figures mentioned in this report for strategic planning which lead to success of the organization.

Request A FREE Sample Copy Gene Therapy Market Report Click here: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-sample/1774

Gene Therapy manufacturers and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the industry. The Gene Therapy Market report also presents the vendor landscape and a corresponding detailed analysis of the major competitive vendors operating in the market. The report also covers segment data, including type segment, industry segment, channel segment, etc. cover different segment market size, both volume and value. The compilation also covers information about clients from different industries, which is very important for the manufacturers.

Market Overview:

The global Gene Therapy Market research report describes the growth and trend of the market in detail, segmenting the global market based on the type and format of the product, the technology used, consumer applications segments product, its end-users, applications, and others of the market; additionally of the Global Gene Therapy Market.

This Gene Therapy Market report contains all aspects that are directly or indirectly related to the multiple areas of the global market. Our experts have carefully collated the global Gene Therapy Market data and estimated the change in the forecast period. This information in the report helps customers make accurate decisions about market activity Gene Therapy Market based on forecasting trends. This report also discusses current or future policy research or regulations that must be initiated by management and market strategies.

Competitive Section

Key players operating the Gene Therapy market are GlaxoSmithKline plc, Bluebird Bio, Inc., Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, Celgene Corporation, Shanghai Sunway Biotech Co. Ltd., Merck KGaA, Transgene SA, and OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Report Highlights: Detailed overview of parent market, Changing market dynamics in the industry, In-depth market segmentation, Historical, current and projected market size in terms of volume and value, Recent industry trends and developments, Competitive landscape, Strategies of key players and products offered, Potential and niche segments, geographical regions exhibiting promising growth, A neutral perspective on market performance, Must-have information for market players to sustain and enhance their market footprint

Regions Mentioned In The Gene Therapy Market Report:

North America ( United States)

Europe ( Germany, France, UK)

Asia-Pacific ( China, Japan, India)

Latin America ( Brazil)

The Middle East & Africa

The Scope of Gene Therapys Market report:

Global market size, supply, demand, consumption, price, import, export, macroeconomic analysis, type, and application segment information by region.

Industry chain analysis, raw material and end-users information

Global key players information including SWOT analysis, companys financial figures, Laser Marking Machine figures of each company are covered.

Powerful market analysis tools used in the report include Porters five forces analysis, PEST analysis, drivers and restraints, opportunities, and threatens.

Based year in this report is 2019; the historical data is from 2014 to 2018 and the forecast year is from 2020 to 2026.

Apply Promo Code CMIFIRST1000 And Get Instant Discount Of USD 1000Quick [emailprotected] https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/buy-now/1774

The Gene Therapys Market Report is Prepared with the Main Agenda to Cover the following points:

Market Size side-effect Categories

Market patterns

Manufacturer Landscape

Distributor Landscape

Valuing Analysis

Top 10 company AnalysisI. Product BenchmarkingII. Product DevelopmentsIII. Mergers and Acquisition Analysis

Patent AnalysisI. Request Analysis ( By Revenue and Volume )II. Country level Analysis (15+)

Excerpt of the overall industry AnalysisI. Product Chain AnalysisII. Production network AnalysisIII. Current and Future Market Landscape AnalysisIV. Opportunity AnalysisV. Income and Volume Analysis

Get FREE PDF Brochure Including COVID-19 Impact Analysis: https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/insight/request-pdf/1774

Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders Analysis of Gene Therapy Market

Various marketing channels like direct and indirect marketing are portrayed in Gene Therapy market report. Important marketing strategical data, Marketing Channel Development Trend, Pricing Strategy, Market Positioning, Target Client Brand Strategy, and Distributors/Traders List.

About Us:

Coherent Market Insights is a global market intelligence and consulting organization focused on assisting our plethora of clients achieve transformational growth by helping them make critical business decisions. We are headquartered in India, having office at global financial capital in the U.S. and sales consultants in United Kingdom and Japan. Our client base includes players from across various business verticals in over 150 countries worldwide. We pride ourselves in catering to clients across the length and width of the horizon, from Fortune 500 enlisted companies, to not-for-profit organization, and startups looking to establish a foothold in the market. We excel in offering unmatched actionable market intelligence across various industry verticals, including chemicals and materials, healthcare, and food & beverages, consumer goods, packaging, semiconductors, software and services, Telecom, and Automotive. We offer syndicated market intelligence reports, customized research solutions, and consulting services.

To know more about us, please visit our website http://www.coherentmarketinsights.com

Contact:

Coherent Market Insights1001 4th Ave, #3200 Seattle, WA 98154, U.S.Email: [emailprotected]United States of America: +1-206-701-6702United Kingdom: +44-020-8133-4027Japan: +050-5539-1737India: +91-848-285-0837

Originally posted here:
Gene Therapy Market 2020 Industry Recent Developments, Size, Emerging Trends, Growth, Progression Status, Latest Technology, and Forecast Research...

Read More...

A bright future for genomics and gene therapy in the UK – Health Service Journal

Monday, August 24th, 2020

This is paid-for content from our commercial partners.Find out more

So-called scientific breakthroughs are often in the headlines, but in reality, ground-breaking medical innovations adhere to a slow process characterised by cautious clinical experimentation and gradual but continuous improvement before reaching patients. After years of effort, gene therapy looks set to become a routine medical approach to address serious unmet medical need.

Sponsored by

There are two types of gene therapy approved for commercial use today. The first, in vivo, uses a modified virus, administered directly into the body to correct the target cells original genetic defect. The second, ex vivo, takes the patients own cells away from their body for genetic modification with a virus and then puts them back into the patient. Ex vivo gene therapy is dominated by two cell types; CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells (bone marrow stem cells) that can be modified to correct certain genetic disorders, and cytotoxic T-cells that can be altered and trained to kill cancerous cells.

The cell and gene therapy industry in the UK is supported by the formation and growth of many companies with promising assets in clinical development. This thriving biotech community is also supported by a robust and prosperous contingent of specialist manufacturing companies. These companies were key to the recent national covid-19 vaccine manufacturing response because the process for making genetically modified adenovirus such as the SARs-COV-02 vaccine, (as developed at the Oxford University Jenner Institute), is very similar to the process for making viruses for gene therapy.

UK leadership in gene therapy is no accident. As specified in our National Industrial Strategy, the UKs many research councils, in particular the Medicines Research Council, are active in funding the development and translation of treatments. In the UK right now, there are approximately 127 clinical trials testing new cell and gene therapy medicines, which represents 12 per cent of the global total. The government is readying the NHS to support these trials and transition these treatments into more common use through funding of the Advanced Therapy Treatment Centres (ATTC), a multiyear multi-million-pound project coordinated by the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult and comprising centres of excellence throughout the UK.

In the UK right now, there are approximately 127 clinical trials testing new cell and gene therapy medicines, which represents 12 per cent of the global total. The government is readying the NHS to support these trials

The ATTCs aim to develop and harmonise adoption of the one and done treatment paradigm by developing the appropriate frameworks and systems to support clinical adoption of these novel therapies. The ATTCs and the NHS are also working in partnership to develop novel medicines assessment and reimbursement paradigms which fairly recognise the ultra-long-term medical benefits that can accrue from a one-time gene therapy treatment. Increased adoption of gene therapy, which is proving to be an approach that can reduce the long-term healthcare burden of chronic disease management, has the potential to significantly lighten the NHS resources required for support of several chronic conditions.

As a future example of the UK commitment to gene therapies, we are also leading the practical application of genetic sequencing (genomics). Formation of the National Genomic Test Directory and support for the 100,000 genomes project by Genomics England are critical steps to improve the diagnosis of patients and identification of a new wave of one-off treatments that could be capable of delivering long-term clinical benefit.

Cell and gene therapies are a revolution in medicine and have even been described as the future of the healthcare system. When you consider that 80 per cent of rare diseases have a genetic component, these treatments could transform the prospects of thousands of people living with these conditions, creating a more economically sustainable and brighter future for them and their families.

Continued here:
A bright future for genomics and gene therapy in the UK - Health Service Journal

Read More...

Gene Therapy: IT Meets Medicine, But Who Is In Charge? – Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Jay Richards talked recently with Matt Scholz, Founder & CEO of Oisn Biotechnologies, about the challenges and promises of the information theory of biotech, especially as related to medicine:

The panel in which Scholz participated at COSM 2019 focused on how artificial intelligence can make a difference in medicine:

From the interview:

Jay Richards: So how would you distill this panel? It was you and Babak Parviz, formerly of Google Glass and now from Amazon (and formerly Google Glass) and Lindy Fishburne, whos on the funding side of information technology and biology.

Matt Scholz: The panel was put together ranging from the computational side of it to the actual therapeutic side and finance. So I think that made it a pretty interesting conversation really, because, to a great extent were working towards the same goals, but from very different angles.

Scholz spoke about his work in gene therapy:

Matt Scholz: What Im working on is, in some respects, the most literal amalgamation of information in life. Like were actually rewriting information in life; its gene therapy. But for the most part, I think the expertise on information and medicine is more on how do you analyze conditions and symptoms, make diagnoses, predict outcomes, that kind of thing.

Note: From the National Institutes of Heath: Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent disease. In the future, this technique may allow doctors to treat a disorder by inserting a gene into a patients cells instead of using drugs or surgery. Researchers are testing several approaches to gene therapy, including:

Replacing a mutated gene that causes disease with a healthy copy of the gene.

Inactivating, or knocking out, a mutated gene that is functioning improperly.

Introducing a new gene into the body to help fight a disease.

Although gene therapy is a promising treatment option for a number of diseases (including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and certain viral infections), the technique remains risky and is still under study to make sure that it will be safe and effective. Gene therapy is currently being tested only for diseases that have no other cures.

Jay Richards: A lot of people ask questions about the problems of the regulatory regime in dealing with some of this new stuff. Whats your opinion in terms of, if there was a single primary impediment to real breakthroughs in this area, is it regulation? Is it just the toughness of the subject? Is it something else?

Matt Scholz: Well, I think the regulation in medicine is considerable both in the time and expense it takes, but I dont think its the primary impediment to anything. In fact, I think particularly in gene therapy, the regulators have been very responsive to changes in technology.

Note: Gene therapy has shown some success with muscular dystrophy (NPR, July 27, 2020), for example, and is an approved treatment for thalassemia (LaBiotech.eu, April 6, 2019). On the other hand, a gene therapy for treatment of hemophilia has been delayed, following questions around how long it lasts (STAT, August 20, 2020) The FDA has been expecting a surge of gene therapy trials (Pharmaceutical Technology, February 5, 2019).

Matt Scholz: Building new treatments in biology is the science itself is hard and the tools we use to build it are clumsy. And so for most of human history, we use mashed up plants to treat diseases, and moving to building viruses and ex vivo cell therapies and manipulating DNA is largely uncharted territory. The regulators have been, Id say, doing an admirable job really, trying to stay on top of those changes and interact with people building them. With that said, obviously, if you want to have a system that takes you a decade to get a drug approved

Jay Richards: Thats what we have.

Matt Scholz: it will cost time and money. And I think theres great conversations that could be had about how we weigh the risk of a drug versus the risk of a disease. And the balance weve struck gives us the system we have today. And its pretty comfortable to think, Okay, well, theres smart people at the FDA who are making sure I dont get things that are dangerous, but if youre dying of a disease

Jay Richards: The cost benefit changes.

Matt Scholz: Yeah, its very different. And I think it may be in some respects, less of what could be done about the regulatory environment as to what can be done to empower the patient. Because right now, the one person who has no say in healthcare is the patient. The bottom of the totem pole.

Jay Richards: Its the same thing with the economics of healthcare. Its a third-party payer problem, but if youre a patient, you actually dont know what the price of the services that youre getting is, thats the problem.

Matt Scholz: Its totally wild, and I think the patient should have the right to be the arbitrator of what goes into their body and not just be subject to the winds of the system. It shouldnt be that what the doctor says, the insurance company says, or even what the FDA says in that respect.

Its there for a reason. We know why these things exist, but its easy to imagine circumstances where you would have a very different perspective on risk and reward. And I would love to see the patients get more power.

You may also enjoy:

Business prof: Stop it! The world is NOT running out of stuff. A famous bet between two top thinkers settled that a long time ago. BYU Hawaiis Gale Pooley tells us, were not creating more atoms but we ARE creating the ability to make these atoms smarter.

and

Valley insider Peter Thiels comments last year proved prophetic: Chinas recent takeover of Hong Kong and the campus Cancel Culture spotlight his warnings for our cultures future in the age of 5G.

Go here to read the rest:
Gene Therapy: IT Meets Medicine, But Who Is In Charge? - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence

Read More...

Functioning liver cells regenerate in pig lymph nodes, and a human trial is coming – FierceBiotech

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Hepatocytes in the liver can naturally regenerate, provided the organ is completely healthy. But when the liver is diseased, it has too much scar tissue to nurture the environment hepatocytes need to replenish themselves.

In a new study published in Liver Transplantation, researchers led by the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine demonstrated that pigs can grow functioning livers in their abdominal lymph nodes after their own hepatocytes are isolated and injected into them. A startup founded by three of the researchers, LyGenesis, is working to bring the method into human clinical trials.

Senior author Eric Lagasse, Ph.D., associate professor of pathology at Pitt, first demonstrated a decade ago that healthy liver cells injected into the lymph nodes of mice with malfunctioning livers would regenerate and take over normal liver functions. To further prove out the concept, Lagasse wanted to replicate the work in a larger model.

Overcoming Scalability Challenges with Autologous Therapies

Catalent presents a clinical-to-commercial perspective on autologous therapies. Join experts Prof. Gerhard Bauer and Catalents Dr. James Crutchley as they discuss challenges and an innovative methodology to commercially scale autologous therapies.

So Lagasse and his team took pieces of healthy liver tissue from six pigs while at the same time cutting off the main blood supply to the organ. They then injected the cells into abdominal lymph nodes. All six animals were able to regain normal liver functions, they reported.

When they examined the lymph nodes, the researchers discovered a plentiful supply of hepatocytes, along with bile ducts and vasculature that had formed in the transplanted cells.

"It's all about location, location, location," Lagasse said in a statement. "If hepatocytes get in the right spot and there is a need for liver functions, they will form an ectopic liver in the lymph node."

RELATED: Liver-focused Ambys launches with $140M, Takeda partnership

Regenerative approaches to treating liver disease have generated enthusiasm among private investors. In 2018, for example, Third Rock Ventures launched Ambys Medicines, which is developing both cell and gene therapy approaches to regenerating hepatocytes.

LyGenesis, which was founded in 2017, got a major boost in May of the following year when it pulled in $3 million in a series A round from Juvenescence, a U.K.-based fund that has raised $165 million to support longevity-focused companies. In October of last year, Juvenescence and Longevity Vision Fund handed LyGenesis another $4 million in private financing and convertible notes.

LyGenesis is gearing up to start a phase 2a clinical trial of its technique in people with end-stage liver disease later this year.

The new animal study follows previous work by Lagasse and colleagues demonstrating that liver tissue grown in the lymph nodes of pigs with a form of genetic liver disease could treat the condition effectively. The researchers believe the technique could ultimately help people with a wide range of liver-damaging diseases, including hepatitis and alcoholism.

Read the rest here:
Functioning liver cells regenerate in pig lymph nodes, and a human trial is coming - FierceBiotech

Read More...

Fact.MR Presents New Report Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market, 2018 and Analysis to 2028 – The Cloud Tribune

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Fact.MR has adopted multi-disciplinary approach to shed light on the evolution of the globalHemophilia Gene Therapymarket. The study presents a deep-dive assessment of the current growth dynamics, major avenues in the estimation year of 2019, and key prospects over the forecast period2018 2028.

Extensive rounds of primary and a comprehensive secondary research have been leveraged by the analysts at Fact.MR to arrive at various estimations and projections of the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market, both at global and regional levels. The analysts have used numerous industry-wide prominent business intelligence tools to consolidate facts, figures, and market data into revenue estimations and projections in the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market.

Request Sample Report@https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=S&rep_id=3107

After reading the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report, readers get insight into:

The Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report offers assessment of prevailing opportunities in various regions and evaluates their shares of revenue by the end of different years of the assessment period. Key regions covered comprise:

The evaluation of the competitive landscape in the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market covers the profile of the following top players:

Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Pfizer Inc., BioMarin Pharmaceuticals, uniQure, Shire PLC, Sangamo Therapeutics, among others.

Tentatively, Hemophilia Gene therapy Market has been segmented on the basis of product type.

On the basis of Indication, Hemophilia Gene therapy Market can be segmented as:

Global Hemophilia Gene therapy Market will witness advancement due to the rising population suffering from hemophilia. According to national institute of hemophilia approximately 20,000 people in U.S. and 400,000worldwide are suffering from hemophilia. The National hemophilia foundation is awarding grants to further support the research for Hemophilia Gene therapy which will in turn help in the treatment of hemophilia. The biopharmaceutical manufacturers and research centers are working together to understand the genetics of hemophilia and improve Hemophilia Gene therapy which could help in treatment of hemophilia in the future. Manufacturers such as Roche has recently acquired Spark Therapeutics for its long term investment hemophilia A gene therapy market. Also many drugs for hemophilia gene therapy are in clinical trials. The continuous investment and research by the manufacturers is expected to improve the hemophilia gene therapy market in the coming future. Also Hemophilia Gene therapy assures to address the unmet needs by one time administration which will further improve its severity. However the arrival of Hemophilia Gene therapy is a concern over its affordability and accessibility.

Request/View TOC@https://www.factmr.com/connectus/sample?flag=T&rep_id=3107

Exclusive offer!!! Get the full report at a discounted rate!!!

The global Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report offers detailed assessments and quantitative evaluations that shed light on numerous key aspects that have shaped its evolution over the historical period. In coming years, some of the key aspects that will shape the growth prospects during the forecast period are objectively covered in the study.

Some important questions that the Hemophilia Gene Therapy market report tries to answer exhaustively are:

Get Full Access of the Report @https://www.factmr.com/report/3107/hemophilia-gene-therapy-market

About Fact.MR

Fact.MR is a fast-growing market research firm that offers the most comprehensive suite of syndicated and customized market research reports. We believe transformative intelligence can educate and inspire businesses to make smarter decisions. We know the limitations of the one-size-fits-all approach; thats why we publish multi-industry global, regional, and country-specific research reports.

Contact Us

MARKETACCESS DMCC

Unit No: AU-01-H

Gold Tower (AU)

Plot No: JLT-PH1-I3A

Jumeirah Lakes Towers

Dubai

United Arab Emirates

Email:sales@factmr.com

Web:https://www.factmr.com/

Originally posted here:
Fact.MR Presents New Report Hemophilia Gene Therapy Market, 2018 and Analysis to 2028 - The Cloud Tribune

Read More...

Global Gene Therapy for Retinal Diseases Market Research Report 2020 Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Adverum Biotechnologies, ProQR…

Monday, August 24th, 2020

InsightAce Analytic Pvt. Ltd. announces the release of market assessment report on Global Gene Therapy for Retinal Diseases Market Assessment Revenue (US$ Mn) Forecast Till 2030

Request for Sample Pages: https://www.insightaceanalytic.com/report-details/global-gene-therapy-for-retinal-diseases-market-assessment/#request-for-tocproposal

According to the latest research by InsightAce Analytic, the global market for gene therapy for retinal diseases was valued at US$ XX Mn and it is expected to reach US$ XX million in 2030, recording a promising CAGR of XX% during the period of 2020-2030.

The most common approach for retinal gene therapy is delivering the normal gene to the retinal cells using a vector, a modified virus engineered to not proliferate or cause structural damage. The genetic retinal disorders can cause blindness or severe vision loss. These disorders are caused due to mutation of genes. The gene therapy helps to stop or slow down progress of retinal disorders. In the recent years, gene therapy for genetic retinal diseases have made major advances. The therapy enhancing cell specific targeting and augmenting the therapeutic effect and limit death of cell. The growing adoption of gene therapy for retinal disorders such as Choroideremia (CHM), Leber congenital amaurosis, Lebers hereditary optic neuropathy, X-linked retinitis pigmentosa etc. is expected to propel the growth of market in the coming future. The growing research activities to develop gene therapy for retinal diseases is expected to propel the growth of market in the coming years.

Request for ToC/Proposal: https://www.insightaceanalytic.com/report-details/global-gene-therapy-for-retinal-diseases-market-assessment/#request-for-tocproposal

Global gene therapy for retinal diseases market reports covers prominent players such as Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Adverum Biotechnologies, ProQR Therapeutics, MeiraGTx Limited., Oxford BioMedica, Horama S.A., Gensight Biologics, Regenxbio Inc., Spark Therapeutics, Inc., Genzyme (Sanofi), Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Nightstar Therapeutics (Biogen), Allergan, and Hemera Biosciences among others.

Curious about this latest version of report? Obtain Report Details @ https://www.insightaceanalytic.com/report-details/global-gene-therapy-for-retinal-diseases-market-assessment/#request-for-tocproposal

Market Segments

Why should buy this report:

For More Information @ https://www.insightaceanalytic.com/report-details/global-gene-therapy-for-retinal-diseases-market-assessment/#request-for-tocproposal

About Us:

InsightAce Analytic is a market research and consulting firm that enables clients to make strategic decisions. Our qualitative and quantitative market intelligence solutions inform the need for market and competitive intelligence to expand businesses. We help clients gain competitive advantage by identifying untapped markets, exploring new and competing technologies, segmenting potential markets and repositioning products. Our expertise is in providing syndicated and custom market intelligence reports with an in-depth analysis with key market insights in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Contact US:

InsightAce Analytic Pvt. Ltd.Tel.: +1 718 593 4405Email:[emailprotected]Site Visit:www.insightaceanalytic.comFollow Us on LinkedIn @bit.ly/2tBXsgSFollow Us OnFacebook@bit.ly/2H9jnDZ

Go here to see the original:
Global Gene Therapy for Retinal Diseases Market Research Report 2020 Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, Adverum Biotechnologies, ProQR...

Read More...

Auxolytic’s Nutrient-Based Shut-Off Switch Boosts Cell Therapy Safety Without Transgenes – BioSpace

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Auxolytic has developed a nutrient-based safety-switch for cell therapies that doesnt rely on introducing transgenes. The process, auxotrophy, uses the engineered inability of an organism to synthesize a compound required for its survival to allow physicians to turn off a gene therapy if serious side effects develop.

The work currently is in preclinical phases, in humanized cells in mice, and appears promising. When it advances to clinical applications, patients receiving cell therapies (such as CAR T, stem cell, and TCR therapies) containing this safety switch would be given supplements of a particular nutrient uridine, in this case. If the cell therapy went awry, patients could simply stop taking the uridine supplement and the cellular therapy would cease to function.

A paper published in Nature Biotechnology describes how the off switch could be engineered into cell therapies. Basically, it says, the approach knocks out the gene that disrupt(s) uridine monophosphate synthetase (UMPS) in the pyrimidine de novo synthesis pathway in cell lines, pluripotent cells, and primary human T cells.

This knockout makes proliferation of the cell therapy dependent on the external supply of uridine. Therefore, researchers can control cell growth by modulating the uridine supply in vitro and, importantly, in vivo after transplantation.

In the movie Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs were engineered to need lysine. If they escaped, there was no lysine to keep them alive. This therapy is very similar, founder and CEO James Patterson, M.D., Ph.D., told BioSpace.

Rather than lysine, Auxolytic uses uridine as the controlling nutrient. Uridine is important in carbohydrate metabolism and is found in yeast, tomatoes, broccoli, sugarcane and other foods, and also can be produced by the body when inadequate amounts are consumed in the diet.

The quantities available through the diet or produced by the body, however, arent high enough to sustain the engineered cells, Patterson said. Evidence comes from a rare genetic disease, orotic aciduria. Patients with that condition have a mutation in the UMPS gene that causes them to produce insufficient levels of the enzyme that breaks down orotic acid. They often die at very young ages if not supplied with quantities of pure uridine. This shows that a normal diet wont compensate.

Patients of cell therapies that incorporate Auxolytics nutrient-based safety switch likely would be able to eat their usual foods, but with nuridine added as a supplement. The approach Dr. Patterson developed hasnt been tested in patients yet.

This is the same nutrient I worked with in yeast, but now in human cells, Patterson said. Early work shows that only the engineered cell therapy would be affected by uridine modulation. Within one week of withdrawing the uridine, the engineered cells were inactive and unable to proliferate. Normal cells continued to function as usual.

At age 27, Patterson already has worked with many of the thought leaders in medicine and biomedical research while pursuing his M.D. and Ph.D. degrees at the University of Cambridge and the Francis Crick Institute. Beginning early during his university days, he performed research placements at the University of Zurich, The Gurdon Institute, The Whitehead Institute and The Cambridge Stem Cell Initiative.

This nutrient-based approach to controlling cell therapy is the direct result of that body of experience.

During my M.D./Ph.D. training, I became interested in cell therapy and its potential for curing patients, but there were safety risks. My Ph.D. work focused on yeast biology, studying how cells control their size. There, the idea of nutrient-based cell control was commonplace, but no one was working on this in human cells, he said. I became interested in science when I was very young, so during my undergraduate work I made sure I was thinking about the science being done in the labs in addition to what I was learning in lectures. Theres a difference.

Lectures lay the scientific foundation, but lab work is cutting-edge and forward-thinking.

I started working in labs when I was 19 in Zurich. I spent all my summers working in labs, asking a range of questions and working in lots of different systems, Patterson said.

Such broad exposure proved foundational for Auxolytic.

As you can see, this is a yeast technology. Thats not where you usually go to look for cell therapy ideas, he added.

He advises students early on to get into exciting labs that are doing interesting, fundamental science. Ask basic questions of how cells work, for example. You never know what youll find that could be applicable to the clinic. Jumping to clinical research (too early) causes you to lose the blue sky thinking.

Auxotyic, based in Cambridge, UK, is, for now, a virtual company of onebut with ample advisors.

Theyve helped along the way in the academic sector and also in the management of business, Patterson said. Those mentors include seasoned industry veterans who know what it takes to take a drug from bench to bedside, and who understand patenting and licensing.

The next step for Auxolytic, scientifically, is to identify potential applications around selecting for differentiated cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Much of the scientific work is being done in collaboration with the Matthew H. Porteus lab at Stanford University.

On the business side, he continued, Were excited to get this into the hands of big cell therapy companies that currently are making cell therapies without a safety switch. Were looking to partner with them to get this to patients.

Auxolytic is talking with several interested companies. People recognize the need for a safety switch and are very excited, Patterson said. Discussions are going well.

Visit link:
Auxolytic's Nutrient-Based Shut-Off Switch Boosts Cell Therapy Safety Without Transgenes - BioSpace

Read More...

Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Detailed Analysis of Current Industry Figures With Forecasts Growth by 2026|Gene Therapy, Recombinant Enzyme,…

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market

Los Angeles, United State:The research study presented here is a brilliant compilation of different types of analysis of critical aspects of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market. It sheds light on how the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market is expected to grow during the course of the forecast period. With SWOT analysis and Porters Five Forces analysis, it gives a deep explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market and different players operating therein. The authors of the report have also provided qualitative and quantitative analyses of several microeconomic and macroeconomic factors impacting the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market. In addition, the research study helps to understand the changes in the industry supply chain, manufacturing process and cost, sales scenarios, and dynamics of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market.

Each player studied in the report is profiled while taking into account its production, market value, sales, gross margin, market share, recent developments, and marketing and business strategies. Besides giving a broad study of the drivers, restraints, trends, and opportunities of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market, the report offers an individual, detailed analysis of important regions such as North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. Furthermore, important segments of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market are studied in great detail with a key focus on their market share, CAGR, and other vital factors.

Get PDF template of this report: https://www.qyresearch.com/sample-form/form/2045580/global-canavan-disease-therapeutics-market

Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Leading Players

The global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market size is projected to reach US$ XX million by 2026, from US$ XX million in 2020, at a CAGR of XX% during 2021-2026. This report focuses on Canavan Disease Therapeutics volume and value at the global level, regional level and company level. From a global perspective, this report represents overall Canavan Disease Therapeutics market size by analysing historical data and future prospect. Regionally, this report focuses on several key regions: North America, Europe, Japan, China, Southeast Asia, India, etc. Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market: Segment Analysis The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by company, by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2015 to 2026. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth. Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market: Regional Analysis The research report includes a detailed study of regions of North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa. The report has been curated after observing and studying various factors that determine regional growth such as economic, environmental, social, technological, and political status of the particular region. Analysts have studied the data of revenue, sales, and manufacturers of each region. This section analyses region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. These analyses will help the reader to understand the potential worth of investment in a particular region. Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market: Competitive Landscape This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and sales by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019. Following are the segments covered by the report are:, Gene Therapy, Recombinant Enzyme, TUR-007, Others By Application:, Clinic, Hospital, Others Key Players: The Key manufacturers that are operating in the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market are:, Pfizer Inc, Turing Pharmaceuticals AG, Competitive Landscape The analysts have provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market with the company market structure and market share analysis of the top players. The innovative trends and developments, mergers and acquisitions, product portfolio, and new product innovation to provide a dashboard view of the market, ultimately providing the readers accurate measure of the current market developments, business strategies, and key financials.

Canavan Disease Therapeutics Segmentation by Product

The global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market size is projected to reach US$ XX million by 2026, from US$ XX million in 2020, at a CAGR of XX% during 2021-2026. This report focuses on Canavan Disease Therapeutics volume and value at

Canavan Disease Therapeutics Segmentation by Application

The global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market size is projected to reach US$ XX million by 2026, from US$ XX million in 2020, at a CAGR of XX% during 2021-2026. This report focuses on Canavan Disease Therapeutics volume and value at the global level, regional level and company level. From a global perspective, this report represents overall Canavan Disease Therapeutics market size by analysing historical data and future prospect. Regionally, this report focuses on several key regions: North America, Europe, Japan, China, Southeast Asia, India, etc. Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market: Segment Analysis The research report includes specific segments by region (country), by company, by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2015 to 2026. Understanding the segments helps in identifying the importance of different factors that aid the market growth. Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market: Regional Analysis The research report includes a detailed study of regions of North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa. The report has been curated after observing and studying various factors that determine regional growth such as economic, environmental, social, technological, and political status of the particular region. Analysts have studied the data of revenue, sales, and manufacturers of each region. This section analyses region-wise revenue and volume for the forecast period of 2015 to 2026. These analyses will help the reader to understand the potential worth of investment in a particular region. Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market: Competitive Landscape This section of the report identifies various key manufacturers of the market. It helps the reader understand the strategies and collaborations that players are focusing on combat competition in the market. The comprehensive report provides a significant microscopic look at the market. The reader can identify the footprints of the manufacturers by knowing about the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and sales by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2015 to 2019. Following are the segments covered by the report are:, Gene Therapy, Recombinant Enzyme, TUR-007, Others By Application:, Clinic, Hospital, Others Key Players: The Key manufacturers that are operating in the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market are:, Pfizer Inc, Turing Pharmaceuticals AG, Competitive Landscape The analysts have provided a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market with the company market structure and market share analysis of the top players. The innovative trends and developments, mergers and acquisitions, product portfolio, and new product innovation to provide a dashboard view of the market, ultimately providing the readers accurate measure of the current market developments, business strategies, and key financials.

Table of Contents

Industry Overview: The first section of the research study touches on an overview of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market, market status and outlook, and product scope. Additionally, it provides highlights of key segments of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market, i.e. regional, type, and application segments.

Competition Analysis: Here, the report brings to light important mergers and acquisitions, business expansions, product or service differences, market concentration rate, the competitive status of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market, and market size by player.

Company Profiles and Key Data: This section deals with the company profiling of leading players of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market on the basis of revenue, products, business, and other factors mentioned earlier.

Market Size by Type and Application: Besides offering a deep analysis of the size of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market by type and application, this section provides a study on top end users or consumers and potential applications.

North America Market: Here, the report explains the changes in the market size of North America by application and player.

Europe Market: This section of the report shows how the size of the Europe market will change in the next few years.

China Market: It gives an analysis of the China market and its size for all the years of the forecast period.

Rest of Asia Pacific Market: The Rest of Asia Pacific market is analyzed in quite some detail here on the basis of application and player.

Central and South America Market: The report explains the changes in the size of the Central and South America market by player and application.

MEA Market: This section shows how the size of the MEA market will change during the course of the forecast period.

Market Dynamics: Here, the report deals with the drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market. This section also includes Porters Five Forces analysis.

Research Findings and Conclusion: It gives powerful recommendations for new as well as established players for securing a position of strength in the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market.Methodology and Data Source: This section includes the authors list, a disclaimer, research approach, and data sources.

Enquire for customization in Report @https://www.qyresearch.com/customize-request/form/2045580/global-canavan-disease-therapeutics-market

Key Questions Answered

What will be the size and CAGR of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market in the next five years?

Which segment will take the lead in the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market?

What has the average manufacturing cost?

What are the key business tactics adopted by top players of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market?

Which region will secure a lions share of the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market?

Which company will show dominance in the global Canavan Disease Therapeutics market?

Table of Contents

1 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Overview1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Canavan Disease Therapeutics1.2 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Segment by Type1.2.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales Growth Rate Comparison by Type (2021-2026)1.2.2 Gene Therapy1.2.3 Recombinant Enzyme1.2.4 TUR-0071.2.5 Others1.3 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Segment by Application1.3.1 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales Comparison by Application: 2020 VS 20261.3.2 Clinic1.3.3 Hospital1.3.4 Others1.4 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Size Estimates and Forecasts1.4.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Revenue 2015-20261.4.2 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales 2015-20261.4.3 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Size by Region: 2020 Versus 20261.5 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Industry1.6 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Trends 2 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Competition by Manufacturers2.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales Market Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)2.2 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2015-2020)2.3 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Average Price by Manufacturers (2015-2020)2.4 Manufacturers Canavan Disease Therapeutics Manufacturing Sites, Area Served, Product Type2.5 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Competitive Situation and Trends2.5.1 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Concentration Rate2.5.2 Global Top 5 and Top 10 Players Market Share by Revenue2.5.3 Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)2.6 Manufacturers Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans2.7 Primary Interviews with Key Canavan Disease Therapeutics Players (Opinion Leaders) 3 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Retrospective Market Scenario by Region3.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Retrospective Market Scenario in Sales by Region: 2015-20203.2 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Retrospective Market Scenario in Revenue by Region: 2015-20203.3 North America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Facts & Figures by Country3.3.1 North America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.3.2 North America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.3.3 U.S.3.3.4 Canada3.4 Europe Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Facts & Figures by Country3.4.1 Europe Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.4.2 Europe Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.4.3 Germany3.4.4 France3.4.5 U.K.3.4.6 Italy3.4.7 Russia3.5 Asia Pacific Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Facts & Figures by Region3.5.1 Asia Pacific Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Region3.5.2 Asia Pacific Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Region3.5.3 China3.5.4 Japan3.5.5 South Korea3.5.6 India3.5.7 Australia3.5.8 Taiwan3.5.9 Indonesia3.5.10 Thailand3.5.11 Malaysia3.5.12 Philippines3.5.13 Vietnam3.6 Latin America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Facts & Figures by Country3.6.1 Latin America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.6.2 Latin America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.6.3 Mexico3.6.3 Brazil3.6.3 Argentina3.7 Middle East and Africa Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Facts & Figures by Country3.7.1 Middle East and Africa Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.7.2 Middle East and Africa Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales by Country3.7.3 Turkey3.7.4 Saudi Arabia3.7.5 U.A.E 4 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Historic Market Analysis by Type4.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales Market Share by Type (2015-2020)4.2 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Revenue Market Share by Type (2015-2020)4.3 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Price Market Share by Type (2015-2020)4.4 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Share by Price Tier (2015-2020): Low-End, Mid-Range and High-End 5 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Historic Market Analysis by Application5.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales Market Share by Application (2015-2020)5.2 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Revenue Market Share by Application (2015-2020)5.3 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Price by Application (2015-2020) 6 Company Profiles and Key Figures in Canavan Disease Therapeutics Business6.1 Pfizer Inc6.1.1 Corporation Information6.1.2 Pfizer Inc Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.1.3 Pfizer Inc Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.1.4 Pfizer Inc Products Offered6.1.5 Pfizer Inc Recent Development6.2 Turing Pharmaceuticals AG6.2.1 Turing Pharmaceuticals AG Corporation Information6.2.2 Turing Pharmaceuticals AG Description, Business Overview and Total Revenue6.2.3 Turing Pharmaceuticals AG Canavan Disease Therapeutics Sales, Revenue and Gross Margin (2015-2020)6.2.4 Turing Pharmaceuticals AG Products Offered6.2.5 Turing Pharmaceuticals AG Recent Development 7 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Manufacturing Cost Analysis7.1 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Key Raw Materials Analysis7.1.1 Key Raw Materials7.1.2 Key Raw Materials Price Trend7.1.3 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials7.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure7.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Canavan Disease Therapeutics7.4 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Industrial Chain Analysis 8 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers8.1 Marketing Channel8.2 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Distributors List8.3 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Customers 9 Market Dynamics9.1 Market Trends9.2 Opportunities and Drivers9.3 Challenges9.4 Porters Five Forces Analysis 10 Global Market Forecast10.1 Global Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Estimates and Projections by Type10.1.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Canavan Disease Therapeutics by Type (2021-2026)10.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Canavan Disease Therapeutics by Type (2021-2026)10.2 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Estimates and Projections by Application10.2.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Canavan Disease Therapeutics by Application (2021-2026)10.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Canavan Disease Therapeutics by Application (2021-2026)10.3 Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Estimates and Projections by Region10.3.1 Global Forecasted Sales of Canavan Disease Therapeutics by Region (2021-2026)10.3.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Canavan Disease Therapeutics by Region (2021-2026)10.4 North America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.5 Europe Canavan Disease Therapeutics Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.6 Asia Pacific Canavan Disease Therapeutics Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.7 Latin America Canavan Disease Therapeutics Estimates and Projections (2021-2026)10.8 Middle East and Africa Canavan Disease Therapeutics Estimates and Projections (2021-2026) 11 Research Finding and Conclusion 12 Methodology and Data Source12.1 Methodology/Research Approach12.1.1 Research Programs/Design12.1.2 Market Size Estimation12.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation12.2 Data Source12.2.1 Secondary Sources12.2.2 Primary Sources12.3 Author List12.4 Disclaimer

About Us:

QYResearch always pursuits high product quality with the belief that quality is the soul of business. Through years of effort and supports from the huge number of customer supports, QYResearch consulting group has accumulated creative design methods on many high-quality markets investigation and research team with rich experience. Today, QYResearch has become a brand of quality assurance in the consulting industry.

Read the rest here:
Canavan Disease Therapeutics Market Detailed Analysis of Current Industry Figures With Forecasts Growth by 2026|Gene Therapy, Recombinant Enzyme,...

Read More...

Sorrento Enters Into Merger Agreement to Acquire SmartPharm and Develop Pipeline of Gene-Encoded Therapeutic Antibodies, Starting With Neutralizing…

Monday, August 24th, 2020

SAN DIEGO AND BOSTON, Aug. 20, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: SRNE, Sorrento) and SmartPharm Therapeutics, Inc. (SmartPharm) announced today the signing of a merger agreement under which Sorrento will acquire SmartPharm, a gene-encoded therapeutics company developing non-viral DNA and RNA gene delivery platforms for COVID-19 and rare diseases with broad potential for application in enhancing antibody-centric therapeutics.

As previously announced on July 24, 2020, Sorrento and SmartPharm entered into a letter of intent setting forth the terms and conditions by which Sorrento would acquire SmartPharm. In consideration for the acquisition, at closing, SmartPharm equity holders will receive up to an aggregate of $19.4 million of shares of Sorrento common stock, subject to certain adjustments, based on a price per share calculated in accordance with the merger agreement.

Sorrento and SmartPharm also previously announced a research and development collaboration to encode and express in vivo Sorrentos proprietary SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies utilizing SmartPharms Gene Mab plasmid nanoparticle platform.

Using SmartPharms technology, Sorrento has identified STI-2020dna (DNA plasmid injection), an antibody encoded DNA plasmid candidate derived from Sorrentos proprietary STI-1499 (COVI-GUARD) and matured and optimized for DNA plasmid delivery to generate antibodies in vivo directed against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its highly contagious D614G variant. STI-2020dna is currently undergoing preclinical in vivo studies and has the potential to generate long-lasting anti-viral protection with a single intra-muscular administration.

We are very encouraged by the preclinical data generated thus far by our STI-2020dna plasmid candidate against COVID-19, said Henry Ji, Ph.D., CEO of Sorrento Therapeutics. STI-2020dna has the potential to produce potent antibodies in the human body in vivo which may provide an attractive alternative to vaccines that might not be effective against the emerging and highly contagious variants of the virus.

The merger with Sorrento presents a tremendous opportunity to advance our next-generation, non-viral gene therapy technology and combine it with Sorrentos significant R&D and manufacturing capabilities, said Jose Trevejo M.D., Ph.D., CEO of SmartPharm Therapeutics. From the first emergence of this deadly coronavirus, Sorrento has dedicated their resources to the development of multiple countermeasures to COVID-19, including potent antibody candidates. This merger should help accelerate our gene-encoded antibody platform technology (Gene Mab) with the ultimate goal of helping patients affected by this global pandemic as well as other diseases.

The transaction is expected to close in early September 2020, subject to customary closing conditions. If the proposed merger is consummated, the issuance of the shares of Sorrento common stock would be made in accordance with an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D thereunder. Such shares of Sorrento common stock would not be registered under the Securities Act and could not be offered or sold without registration unless an exemption from such registration is available. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any shares of Sorrento common stock.

About SmartPharm Therapeutics

SmartPharm Therapeutics, Inc. is a privately held, development stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing next-generation, non-viral gene therapies for the treatment of serious or rare diseases with the vision of creating Biologics from Within. SmartPharm is currently developing a novel pipeline of non-viral, gene-encoded proteins for the treatment of conditions that require biologic therapy such as enzyme replacement and tissue restoration. SmartPharm commenced operations in 2018 and is headquartered in Cambridge, MA, USA. For more information, please visit http://www.smartpharmtx.com.

About Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

Sorrento is a clinical stage, antibody-centric, biopharmaceutical company developing new therapies to turn malignant cancers into manageable and possibly curable diseases. Sorrento's multimodal, multipronged approach to fighting cancer is made possible by its extensive immuno-oncology platforms, including key assets such as fully human antibodies ("G-MAB library"), clinical stage immuno-cellular therapies ("CAR-T", "DAR-T"), antibody-drug conjugates ("ADCs"), and clinical stage oncolytic virus ("Seprehvir"). Sorrento is also developing potential coronavirus antiviral therapies and vaccines, including COVIDTRAP, ACE-MAB, COVI-MAB, COVI-GUARD, COVI-SHIELD and T-VIVA-19; and diagnostic test solutions, including COVI-TRACK and COVI-TRACE. Sorrento's commitment to life-enhancing therapies for patients is also demonstrated by our effort to advance a first-in-class (TRPV1 agonist) non-opioid pain management small molecule, resiniferatoxin ("RTX"), and ZTlido (lidocaine topical system) 1.8% for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia. RTX is completing a phase IB trial for intractable pain associated with cancer and a phase 1B trial in osteoarthritis patients. ZTlido was approved by the FDA on February 28, 2018.

For more information, visit http://www.sorrentotherapeutics.com

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release and any statements made for and during any presentation or meeting contain forward-looking statements related toSorrento Therapeutics, Inc., under the safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding the proposed acquisition of SmartPharm; the completion of the proposed acquisition of SmartPharm; the potential effects that the acquisition of SmartPharm may have on Sorrentos business and product candidate pipeline; the expected timing for the closing of the transaction; the data read-outs related to ongoing studies for COVID-19 using antibodies and gene-encoded antibodies; the potency and potential blocking capabilities of STI-1499 and STI-2020dna and their respective impact on SARS-CoV-2 and the D614G variant; the expected length of any antiviral protection provided by STI-1499 and STI-2020dna; the potential administration and applications of STI-1499 and STI-2020dna, alone or in combination; the timeline and status of preclinical testing for STI-1499 and STI-2020dna; the potential safety and efficacy of STI-1499 and STI-2020dna; the therapeutic potential of STI-1499 and STI-2020dna for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19; the potential costs associated with manufacturing STI-2020dna and other DNA plasmids; Sorrentos ability to produce antibody candidates against pathogens and cancer cells; Sorrentos ability to transition from product development to full scale manufacturing and commercialization; Sorrentos ability to advance SmartPharms intellectual property, including its non-viral gene therapy technology and its gene-encoded platform technology; Sorrentos ability to combine SmartPharms intellectual property, including its non-viral gene therapy technology, with Sorrentos research and development and manufacturing capabilities; and Sorrentos potential position in the anti-viral immunity industry. Risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in our forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to: risk that the proposed acquisition of SmartPharm will not occur; risks related to Sorrento's technologies and prospects with newly acquired technologies, including the proposed acquisition of SmartPharm and the utilization of SmartPharms Gene-Encoded Therapeutics (GET) platforms for the treatment and prevention of coronavirus infections and other pathogens and cancer cells; risks related to seeking regulatory approvals and conducting clinical trials; the clinical and commercial success of the treatment and prevention of coronavirus infections using monoclonal antibodies and gene-encoded antibodies; the viability and success of using monoclonal antibodies and gene-encoded antibodies for treatments in anti-viral therapeutic areas, including coronavirus; clinical development risks, including risks in the progress, timing, cost and results of clinical trials and product development programs; risk of difficulties or delays in obtaining regulatory approvals; risks that prior study and trial results may not be replicated in future studies and trials; risks that clinical study results may not meet any or all endpoints of a clinical study and that any data generated from such studies may not support a regulatory submission or approval; risks related to seeking regulatory approvals and conducting clinical trials; risks of manufacturing drug product; risks related to leveraging the expertise of its employees, subsidiaries, affiliates and partners to assist the company in the execution of its strategies; risks related to the global impact of COVID-19 and other risks that are described in Sorrento's most recent periodic reports filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, including Sorrento's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2019, and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in those filings. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in this press release except as required by law.

Media and Investor Relations

Alexis Nahama, DVM (SVP Corporate Development)Telephone: 1.858.203.4120Email: mediarelations@sorrentotherapeutics.com

Sorrento and the Sorrento logo are registered trademarks of Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

G-MAB, COVI-GUARDTM, COVI-SHIELD, COVIDTRAP, T-VIVA-19, COVI-MAB, ACE-MABTM, COVI-TRACK, COVI-TRACE, Saving-Life and Improving-Life are trademarks of Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.

ZTlido is a trademark owned by Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

2020 Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Go here to see the original:
Sorrento Enters Into Merger Agreement to Acquire SmartPharm and Develop Pipeline of Gene-Encoded Therapeutic Antibodies, Starting With Neutralizing...

Read More...

Highly Automated Precision Medicine is the Future of Cellular Immunotherapy – Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News

Monday, August 24th, 2020

Sponsored content brought to you by

Challenges remain in cell therapy manufacturing optimization and scalability, especially when developing autologous therapies. In a recent GENwebinar, Matthew Hewitt, PhD, head of R&D (a.i.) and clinical development, personalized medicine at Lonza, and Stacey Willard, PhD, director of product management at IsoPlexis, provided an overview of the Cocoon cell therapy manufacturing platform and the IsoLight single-cell proteomics system along with data from case studies.

These next-generation technologies allow for the decentralized manufacturing of novel cell therapies and the complete functional characterization of each single cell in the resultant product. The combination improves end-to-end automation by minimizing the need for human involvement and helps ensure functional potency of the manufactured cell products. To view the on-demand webinar, visit GENengnews.com/IsoLight.

Each cell therapy approach has intricacies. The automated cell therapy manufacturing Cocoon platform is designed to alleviate pain points for patient-scale production. The closed, scalable platform uses a single-use customizable cassette that can accommodate a variety of cell therapy processes.

The environmental shell, cassette, and software are the Cocoons three main units. The dual-zone environmental unit offers a 37C warm temperature proliferation zone for the cells and a 4C refrigerated zone for reagents and waste. The intuitive software is 21 CFR Part 11 compliant and supports quick process modification. The scalable Cocoon tree has a small footprint and allows use of up to eight cassettes for simultaneous clinical trials or commercial production.

To demonstrate the capabilities of the Cocoon system, Hewitt presented a comparison study with a culture bag system for a HER2 lentiviral vector CAR-T process. Results showed higher viability in the Cocoon system as well as an increase in transduction efficiency and the number of transduced cells. Transduced cells expressed similar IFN and TNF, and were comparable in co-culture tumor killing assays.

Combining the IsoLight system with the Cocoon platform allows quantification of the true functional biology of the cell product. Although other analytic approaches provide rich data, they do not reveal single cell functional detail, which facilitates better predictions of potency, durability, and adverse effects.

The IsoLights functional phenotyping is emerging as the standard biomarker in immune medicine, the only functional cellular analysis tool that can uniquely detect predictive high-functional super cells to uncover cellular signals or correlative biomarkers.

The automated IsoLight system is an integrated plug & play hardware and software solution for all IsoPlexis chip products. Willard detailed how the proteomically barcoded chip enables quantification of 30+ proteins simultaneously per cell providing useful, impactful single cell data. Panels exist to measure the secretome, proteome, and metablome.

The software quickly generates great visualizations to stratify samples, reveal functional differences, pinpoint biological drivers, and calculate the significance of the polyfunctionality of the cells.

IsoPlexis has been involved in the creation of many durable potent cell therapy products, using a wide variety of cell types. This single cell analysis fits into the manufacturing process at any and all stages, and is critical to gaining an understanding of the true function of the cells that can be masked at the population level.

IsoPlexis single-cell proteomics and quality analytics are applicable at every stage of development from preclinical mouse research, process development, all the way to patient characterization and stratification. To demonstrate the importance of this metric, Willard illustrated data from several recent publications.

For example, collaboration with Kite Pharma on their CD19 CAR-T product showed a correlation between polyfunctionality and treatment response. In other studies, the predictive polyfunctionality enhanced cell therapy development, and was correlated with preclinical outcome in gene-edited therapies, novel CAR-T comparisons, and combination T-cell therapies and agonists.

This collaboration between Lonza and IsoPlexis highlights the evolution of cell therapy manufacturing. As we continue to scale the manufacturing of cell therapies, it will be critical to characterize the quality and performance of these products with technologies such as IsoPlexis IsoLight, said Hewitt.

See the rest here:
Highly Automated Precision Medicine is the Future of Cellular Immunotherapy - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News

Read More...

Page 25«..1020..24252627..3040..»


2024 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick