header logo image


Page 49«..1020..48495051..60..»

Archive for the ‘Blindness’ Category

How Diabetes Causes Blindness-Topic Overview – WebMD

Thursday, June 8th, 2017

Over time, high blood sugar levels from diabetes lead to damage of the retina, the layer on the back of the eye that captures images and sends them as nerve signals to the brain. Whether diabetic retinopathy develops depends in part on how high blood sugar levels have been and how long they have been above a target range. Other things that may increase your risk for diabetic retinopathy include high blood pressure, pregnancy, a family history of the condition, kidney disease, high cholesterol, and whether you smoke.

The early stages of retinal damage are called nonproliferative retinopathy. First, tiny blood vessels called capillaries in the retina develop weakened areas in their walls called microaneurysms. When red blood cells escape through these weakened walls, tiny amounts of bleeding (hemorrhages) become visible when the retina is viewed through an instrument called an ophthalmoscope. To clearly see your retina, the ophthalmologist will enlarge (dilate) your pupils (which serve as a window to the back of your eye) and may also use a special dye to help identify blood vessels that may be leaking.

Fluid from the blood also escapes, leading to yellowish "hard exudates." This type of damage does not cause problems with vision unless some of the leaking fluid is near the macula. (The macula is the area of the retina that is responsible for central vision.) An ophthalmologist who specializes in the treatment of retinal problems will attempt to stop blood leakage by using a laser in a process called photocoagulation. By using an appropriately selected laser, your ophthalmologist may seal the small blood vessels that can leak when a person has nonproliferative and proliferative retinopathy. More recently, ophthalmologists have been using injectable medicines to treat retinal leakage.

If fluid leaks out near the macula, it can disrupt vision. This is called macular edema. As retinopathy becomes more severe, parts of the abnormal capillaries can become closed off. This kills parts of the retina that the capillaries previously supplied with blood. These tiny damaged parts of the retina are called "cotton wool" spots and can be seen using an ophthalmoscope.

The later stages of retinal injury are called proliferative retinopathy, because new fragile blood vessels grow to supply the damaged areas of the retina. These new blood vessels can bleed into the vitreous gel, the gel-filled area in front of the retina. Over time, scar tissue that forms from bleeding can cause the retina to detach from the wall of the eye (retinal detachment) and cause loss of vision.

Severe proliferative retinopathy may be treated with laser surgery in order to save vision. Your eye doctor may use more aggressive laser therapy, called scatter (pan-retinal) photocoagulation. This process is more thorough than that used in localized photocoagulation. And it may require more individual treatments. But it allows your doctor to minimize the growth of new blood vessels across the back of your retina. Severe proliferative retinopathy may also be treated with medicines that slow the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the retina. The growth of these vessels is triggered by a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Anti-VEGF medicines, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis), block the effects of VEGF.

Laser treatments may not always work in treating proliferative retinopathy. If you have retinal detachment or hemorrhages that cannot be repaired, your retinal specialist will need to use a surgical technique to try to restore your vision. This surgical technique, called pars plana vitrectomy, attempts to repair your retina and reduce hemorrhaging. Like many surgical techniques, it has several risks and is much more likely to damage your eye than laser surgery.

People who have diabetes are also at risk for other problems, such as cataracts and glaucoma, that damage vision. They are also at risk for a severe form of glaucoma called neovascular glaucoma. Cataracts are frequently caused by a lifetime of sun exposure, and diabetes speeds up their formation.

The following table outlines the major causes of blindness in people who have diabetes.

Condition

How it causes vision loss

Preventive measures

If you notice problems with your vision, you should immediately seek medical evaluation by an ophthalmologist. Regular eye exams are meant to detect any retinopathy at the nonproliferative stage, where it may still be treated with a good chance of success.

If nonproliferative retinopathy is not detected and treated early, it may progress to proliferative retinopathy. During proliferative retinopathy, your body tries to correct the microaneurysms. To replace blood vessels that have broken or leaked, new blood vessels begin to form. These blood vessels are fragile and may break easily, causing bleeding into the middle of the eye and clouding vision. They also form scar tissue that can pull on the retina and cause the retina to detach from the wall of the eye.

With aggressive management of your condition-keeping your blood sugar in your target range and controlling blood pressure-along with regular screening of your vision, you may be able to prevent or delay blindness.

WebMD Medical Reference from Healthwise

Follow this link:
How Diabetes Causes Blindness-Topic Overview - WebMD

Read More...

Saving three-month-old infant from blindness – The Hindu

Thursday, June 8th, 2017

The Hindu
Saving three-month-old infant from blindness
The Hindu
Like blood pressure, every eye has intraocular pressure. In glaucoma, the watery fluid called aqueous humour flows into the eye, but does not exit. This increases the eye pressure and leads to blindness, says S.A. Hussain Naqvi, head of medical ...
2-month-old baby undergoes successful eye surgeryThe Hans India
2-month-old treated for rare glaucomaTimes of India

all 4 news articles »

See the article here:
Saving three-month-old infant from blindness - The Hindu

Read More...

Blood sport blindness afflicts our politicians – Holyrood.com

Thursday, June 8th, 2017

Fox - credit gingiber

Humanity and compassion have been on the forefront of peoples minds in recent weeks, and even demonstrated by our politicians.

What a shame, though, that there cant be more compassion shown towards the animal kingdom at a time when the enjoyment of inflicting pain and death on fellow creatures is as popular as ever.

And it even featured in the Conservative manifesto.

RELATED CONTENT

Nearly one in three satellite tagged golden eagles in Scotland died in suspicious circumstances, finds SNH

MSPs to consider banning wild animals from travelling circuses

Theresa May tells voters she is in favour of fox hunting

The UK Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary, Andrea Leadsom, who self-identifies as an animal lover, recently tweeted: Fully committed to protecting rare species in our Conservative manifesto. Saving iconic and hugely loved elephant is vital.

This is a ludicrous assessment of a manifesto which dropped a commitment to a ban on the sale of ivory.

Its a mystifying move given that an elephant is killed by poachers every 25 minutes, as the march towards extinction gathers apace; and it is far, far too late for politicians to be worrying about their popularity among the crucial wealthy antique-dealer electorate.

Perhaps less surprising is the indication that restrictions on fox hunting will be repealed.

Leadsom has said preventing hunters in traditional dress driving a pack of dogs through the countryside to chase then rip apart a fox has not proven to be in the interests of animal welfare whatsoever.

And Theresa May told some factory workers she was in favour of hunting.

Trying to explain fox hunting to my seven-year-old daughter is a difficult process, because while children can be very cruel, they also understand cruelty should not be fun.

The hunting lobby argues that people who oppose it the majority of people fail to understand the longstanding traditions and pursuits of countryside life, that people who live in cities over-sentimentalise animals.

Even leaving aside the class element to that, these arguments fall flat because they are condescending and fickle. However you dress it up, cruelty is cruelty. A culture of cruelty. Even a seven-year-old can understand that.

Compassion is not ignorant. Finding blood sport abhorrent is not complicated, it is principled. Its human.

And blood sport blindness is not exclusively a Tory pastime. The Scottish Government is considering relaxing the ban on amputating puppies tails introduced in 2007.

New exemptions would apply to just two breeds and only if they are likely to be used as a working dog, but the British Veterinary Association told MSPs that any concession would be a retrograde step for Scotland when prior to now it has always been cited as a key example of the Scottish lead on animal welfare.

Arguments for introducing exemptions come from another community of enthusiastic blood sport fanatics. Evidence shows gun dogs who work, particularly Spaniels, are at risk of injury if they have a tail.

But instead of examining the bloodthirsty practice that causes such injuries to these dogs, the answer instead is to mutilate the animal when they are born, and without any pain relief. The fact a dog uses its tail for balance and communication is inconvenient in such a job, apparently.

If your dog is suffering life-threatening injuries during your pursuit of the murder of birds, just maybe that isnt the fault of its tail.

Add in the corpses of driven grouse and the death of a number of inconvenient birds of prey - one in three golden eagles - as well as an annual cull of meddlesome mountain hares, and countryside pursuits is racking up quite the body count.

Will animal rights legislation ever recognise the culpability of the human in the equation?

We are supposed to be special because we have reason and rational thought. Indeed, Scotland is famous for both. But theres really nothing reasonable or rational about cruelty.

Time for some humanity and compassion in the face of barbarism.

Read the rest here:
Blood sport blindness afflicts our politicians - Holyrood.com

Read More...

16.7% of blindness in Nigeria caused by Glaucoma- CAS – Daily Trust

Tuesday, June 6th, 2017

Daily Trust
16.7% of blindness in Nigeria caused by Glaucoma- CAS
Daily Trust
Speaking at a Glaucoma awareness lecture and screening exercise organised for personnel and locals of the Nigerian Air Force base in Kaduna on Tuesday, the CAS while quoting the National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey in Nigeria which was ...

Read the original post:
16.7% of blindness in Nigeria caused by Glaucoma- CAS - Daily Trust

Read More...

HR McMaster and the Blindness of American Hubris – The Nation.

Tuesday, June 6th, 2017

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster walks to a meeting between President Donald Trump and Saudi King Salman at the Royal Court Palace in Riyadh, May 20, 2017. (AP Photo / Evan Vucci)

How did the worlds only superpower wind up in the middle of this war-crazy mess?The United States seems to be dealing with three or four enemies at once.Or switching sides when a renegade militia changes its name and allegiance.Or refighting old wars Americansthought they had already won.

Its hard to keep track, and lots of citizens have stopped trying. When the Cold War ended a generation ago, the United States took on the singular role of global peacekeeper, protecting or punishing other nations depending on their behavior and values. We spread troops and clandestine warriors in black among scores of nations to keep the peace. It sounded like a noble commitment.

Now our so-called indispensable nation finds itself beset with confusion and contradictions, trying to cope with half a dozen or more irregular insurgencies, some hostile, some friendly. Instead of peace and tranquility, the American Goliath seems to attract a swarm of killer bees.

Washington doesnt know how to win in Afghanistanor how to get out of it.

At the moment, the war in Afghanistan is heating up again. The Taliban are recapturing the countryside and slaughtering scores of young Afghan army recruits assembled for weekly prayers, or blowing up Kabul.American hawks are once again calling for more troops, more arms, and more money. President Trump sent National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster to survey the troubled scene and propose a new strategy.

This is an old story.The United States has been at war in Afghanistan for nearly 16 years. New strategies were also proposed by Trumpspredecessors, but none of them succeeded. Washington doesnt know how to win this war or how to get out of it.

Modern warfare, it seems, does not require victory or defeat, just hanging on.On this perverse battlefield, adversaries fight with different weapons. Our side has the wondrous tools of high-tech weaponry, like precision bombing by pilotless drones or video terrain maps for tank commanders. The other side has, in addition to the usual tactics of guerrilla warfare, terrorism, including the deployment of children wearing suicide bombs as jackets to blow up a crowded marketplace.

Yet, strangely enough, the gravest threat to America is not these foreign terrorists. It is a threat closer to home that political leaders dont wish to talk about: We endanger ourselves.

What pulls us deeper and deeper into violence is American hubristhe false pride of our triumphalist pretensions.

What pulls our reluctant citizenry deeper and deeper into chaos and violence is American hubristhe false pride of our triumphalist pretensions. The assumption is that our authority in the world ultimately relies upon our awesome destructive power.The US monopoly on deadly force is supposedly justified by our nobleintentionsprotecting world peace.During the Cold War rivalry, both sides competed, mainly on matching nuclear arsenals, but they did not make the mistake of launching direct war against each other (prudent strategy for both sides).

Without the Soviet empire, Goliath was stuck without a rivalry or clearpurpose. Instead of promoting a general drawdown in weaponry and strategies,the United States and its NATO partners enlarged their franchisethey were no longer just defending the homeland but now reforming the world.

In particular, America dispersed fighting forces and command centersto nearly every continent. These deployments wereintended as warning flags for bad guysdont mess with the United Statesbut some bad guys didnt get the message. And American right-wingers promoted a far more aggressive agenda of changing dozens of supposedly roguish nations that did not comply with our governing values. Iraq was high on the list. The murderous 9/11 terror attack provided the trigger for a generational restart of war-making.

Goliath was ready. Having made themselves the fearsome giant of good intentions, American military leaders felt they could not back away from shooting wars without experiencing utter shame and cowardice. Yet if the United States were to use its full-strength power to kill and conquer, it would destroy its good standing among nations.So the United States clumsily decided to have it both ways.

The Bush/Cheney war on Iraq was launched with a battle slogan that expressed the arrogance of American power: shock and awe. Bomb the crap out of them, and theyll surrender without a fight.

People like the sound of our claim that we are a mighty nation that is both virtuous and deadly dangerous.

In war and peace, Americans seem blinded by their power. People like the sound of our inflated self-confidenceour claim that we are a mighty nation that is both virtuous and deadly dangerous. We further protectedourselves from harm by acquiring still greater killing power and inventing more ingenious ways of delivering destruction.

Terrorismeffectively undermined that reassuring premise. Terror cant win on a traditional battlefield, but it might succeed in deranging Goliath.The governing elites have no real solution for this dilemma, so they keep faith with the old formula for deterrencethe threat of massive retaliationeven though it no longer deters.

In the history of nations, hubris is dangerous territory.Over-wrought pretensions of superiority have brought down kings and empires.Failure to recognize new power realities has led great nations to tragic endings. Does it sound far-fetched to suggest that the United States is now endangered by hubris?Someold soldiers have observed the symptoms.

As a young military officer, McMaster realized that the easy US victory in Desert Storm was profoundly misleading.

As a young tank commander in 1991, H.R. McMaster performed brilliantly in the short, successful war called Desert Storm.Captain McMasters unit of nine Abrams tanks destroyed some 80 Iraqi tanks and other vehicles, and McMaster was decorated with the Silver Star.Yet he realized afterward that the easy US victory in Desert Storm was profoundly misleading and encouraged American war-fighting in disastrously wrong directions.

Popular images from the Gulf War portrayed impressive technologies and flawless operations that went exactly to plan, McMasterwould later write in a sober critique. The public was left with only videos of precision strikes against fixed targets and hapless Iraqi conscripts surrendering in droves without a fight.

But McMaster recognized that military leaders were themselves misled by their swift and overwhelming victory. American power, the Pentagon strategists assumed,would rule in this new, post-Soviet world.American technological advantageswould invent weapons of the future that could literally reinvent the nature of war. Ebullient optimismfollowed the triumph of capitalism and democracy over communism and totalitarianism, McMaster explained.

The triumphalism bothered him a lot.Studying at the Amy War College in 2003, the same year Bush/Cheney launched their Iraq War, McMaster published a powerful essay of dissentCrack in the Foundationthat invoked the Greek concept of hubris: Extreme pride that leads to overconfidence and often results in misfortune.

Withoutnaming names, McMaster explained: The hero vainly attempts to transcend human limits and often ignores warnings that portend a disastrous fate. McMaster perceived such overconfidence in the so-called shock and awe precision strikes. Hubris permeates the language of defense transformation, he wrote.

Warnings by McMaster and other officers were ignored.Disaster did indeed follow.As a colonel, McMaster was admired as a gutsy iconoclast, but he was twice passed over for promotion to brigadier general. His perspectives have changed a lot in 15 years, but the same challenging questions need to be asked. Is the United States launching bombs and missiles or sending more troops to Afghanistan to accomplish plausible strategic goals that are in Americas interest?Or are the generals just trying to protect Goliaths reputation as the toughest guy on the block?

THE STAKES ARE HIGHER NOW THAN EVER. GET THE NATION IN YOUR INBOX.

American hubris was further encouraged by a convergence with the extraordinary digital technologies emerging at the same time.Some giddy military theorists proclaimed the advent of a revolution in military affairs that would lift the fog of war by bringing precision and certainty to the chaos of battle. Certainly, targeting is greatly improved, andbattle commanders have real-time knowledge that informs their tactics.But the visionaries of high-tech war sometimes sound like theyre hallucinating. McMaster didnt buy it.

Under these constructs, McMaster explained, wars would be efficient and even more humane.Near perfect information would make possible precise application of force from great distances which would, in turn, reduce the risk to US forces, minimize collateral damage and even make the battlefield a safer place for the enemy. Makingwar safer for the enemy? Wow. That is visionary.

In fact, when McMaster studied war-fighting doctrines published by the armed services, he found a shocking omission.Theenemy is generally absent from these descriptions of future war, he wrote. When the enemy does appear, he is quickly overwhelmed by American strength and the interactions betweenforces is limited to the application of US military power followed closely by enemy capitulation. That is hubris as a formal policy.

You might call it dream war.Lots more explosives, but not as many people get hurt. New war-fighting machines that kill from a long distance with incredible accuracy.And theres no pilot error, because there are no pilots. Computers do the targeting, even fly the planes.This very pleasing fantasy evaporated once the other side started turning children into bombs, religious faithful into sacrificial killers.

We assumed that [technological] advanceswere going to make wars risk free. But thats not true, of course. McMaster

McMaster was addressing a business group when he ruefully explained the failed dream: We assumed that advances in information, surveillance technology, technical-intelligence collection, automated decision-making tools, and so on were going to make wars fast, cheap, efficient and relatively risk freethat technology would lift the fog of wars and make warfare essentially a targeting exercise. But thats not true, of course.

The new new US strategy has attempted to put people back into the storyorganizing and encouraging reconnections within local populations instead of simply bombing their communities and attacking local insurgents. McMaster has been a leading forcefor this counterinsurgency doctrine in both Iraq and Afghanistan, calling for improving social conditions like health and education while fighting corruption and warlord politics.Building stronger communities for the Afghan people while bombing the Taliban may seem like a virtuous project, but its not yet clear that it can succeed, not without years and maybe decades of US subsidy and military protection.

American peacekeeping missions fail in Afghanistan and elsewhere because they are trying to straddle two contradictory goalsthe violent conquest of native insurgencies, along with humanist healing for people in severely deprived societies. Its not obvious that either of those goals can be achieved separately.But the straddle sets up continuous collision between warriors and health givers, in which the American interest is impossible to define confidently, much less sustain politically.

One month we may be building schools and hospitals.The next month we might blow them up. This is not a sustainable posture. Americanscan provide assistancein good faith; they do in many places, and that is certain to continue. But the truly rough challenge confronting Americans is to re-examine ourselves and discard a lot of pieties that are not good for us or for the world.That doesnt mean dropping out. But we are not in charge of running the world.Nor are we obligated to fight in every other war that comes along.

This is a hard conversation for Americans tohave, since it will be misunderstood and is sure to provoke patriotic distemper.On the other hand, Americans like to argue, and there is a lot to argue over. Personally, Im tired of arguing over wars and whereor whywe should fight them.

See the article here:
HR McMaster and the Blindness of American Hubris - The Nation.

Read More...

We’re Ending Blindness. Are You In? | blindness.org

Monday, June 5th, 2017

Your one-time or monthly gift will help fund treatments and cures through cutting edge research.

Make a one-time gift

Become a monthly donor

Make a gift to honor or remember someone you know affected by vision loss.

Donate in Honor

Donate in Memory

Join a VisionWalk near you or create your own DIY fundrasing event to support research.

Vision Walk

DIY Fundraising

Send your check to Foundation Fighting Blindness P.O. Box 17279 Baltimore, MD 21297-0495

1-800-683-5555 from Monday - Friday 8am to 4pm Eastern Time

Remember the Foundation Fighting Blindness through a bequest, charitable annuity or other Planned Gift. Visit My Plan to Fight Blindness to learn how a Planned Gift can provide possible tax benefits for you while supporting scientific breakthroughs in vision research.

Get involved with Envision 20/20 the Foundations Campaign to accelerate research for treatments and cures. Learn more about the Campaign, including the Gordon and Llura Gund Family Challenge, which will match Campaign gifts of $25,000 or more doubling your impact! Learn more.

Looking for an easy way to double your impact? Ask your employer if they match gifts made by their employees. Simply fill out our companys matching gift form and submit it to the Foundation Fighting Blindness to complete and return to maximize your gift!

Support the Foundation through the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC code #11721), the United Way or other workplace donation program through a one-time gift or the convenience of payroll deduction programs. Learn more

The Foundation Fighting Blindness is proud to partner with regional and national companies committed to the fight against blindness. For more information on how your company can make a difference. Click here

Original post:
We're Ending Blindness. Are You In? | blindness.org

Read More...

World-First Trials Have Been Launched to Treat Parkinson’s And Blindness With Embryonic Stem Cells – ScienceAlert

Monday, June 5th, 2017

In a world first, surgeons in the Chinese city of Zhengzhou are planning to inject stem cells derived from human embryos into the brains of patients with Parkinson's disease with the aim of treating their debilitating symptoms.

Meanwhile, another medical team in the same city is aiming to target vision loss using embryonic stem cells (ESC) to replace lost cells in the retina, marking a new direction in China in the wake of major changes in how the country regulates stem cell treatments.

While similar treatments on Parkinson's patients have already been tested in Australia, those trials relied on cells taken from eggs that were forced to divide without first being fertilised in an effort to circumvent any ethical concerns.

Stem cells are a little like blank slates that are yet to take on a specific task. If you rewind the clock on any of your body's tissues, its cells will become less specialised, until you're left with a cell with a lot of potential to become nearly anything.

In the case of both kinds of embryonic stem cells, divided egg cells are subjected to various treatments to encourage them to develop into replacement cells that could treat a condition in a recipient.

The symptoms of Parkinson's disease are largely caused by a loss of nervous tissue deep inside the brain in an area called the basal ganglia.

Losing those cells means a loss of a neurotransmitter called dopamine, and with it a lower ability to control nervous impulses that would prevent muscles in the extremities from activating.

In the case of a condition called macular degeneration, damage to a layer of tissue called the retinal pigment epithelium at the back of the eye causes the light-catching cells above it to die.

By turning ESC into cells that can naturally develop into the tissues that have deteriorated such as the precursors to neurons that can produce dopamine, or into retinal tissue and then injecting it into the target site, the researchers hope to improve the lost functions.

Not everybody is convinced of the success of trials such as those being done in China and last year in Australia.

A stem cell biologist from the Scripps Research Institute in California, Jeanne Loring, believes the choice of cell used in both Parkinson's disease trials won't be specialised enough to match expected results.

"Not knowing what the cells will become is troubling," Loring told David Cyranoski at Nature.

But the research team in China remains confident in its decision.

Qi Zhou from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Zoology in Beijing is the stem cell specialist leading both sets of ESC trials, and says four years of animal trials conducted on monkeys have so far showed promising results.

"We have all the imaging data, behavioural data, and molecular data to support efficacy," Zhou told Nature.

He also claims the team conducting the Parkinson's trial have been selective with their potential candidates, choosing patients who will have the least chance of rejecting the ESCs from the cell bank.

In 2015, China introduced tough new regulations to deal with the growing problem of 'rogue clinics' offering stem cell treatments without due record keeping or process, making it hard to evaluate safety, or even the types of cells used in the treatments.

The changes are set to improve the ethics and safety of stem cell treatments by enforcing the use of cells through a regulatory body, ensuring informed patient consent, and permitting treatments only through authorised hospitals.

Time will tell if the regulations can be enforced, but for stem cell researchers, the changes are positive.

"It will be a major new direction for China," stem cell scientist Pei Xuetaotold Nature.

If the results are as good as the teams in Australia and China predict, it could also set new standards for the world.

Originally posted here:
World-First Trials Have Been Launched to Treat Parkinson's And Blindness With Embryonic Stem Cells - ScienceAlert

Read More...

‘Glaucoma is symptomless, leads to blindness in few yrs’ | Indore … – Times of India

Sunday, June 4th, 2017

INDORE: Glaucoma is major cause of eye related problem but due to lack of awareness, around 90 per cent patients fail to get timely treatment, says an expert during a two-day conference- Ophthalmology Tomorrow- that started on Saturday.

"Glaucoma, also known as eye pressure, is a symptomless disease and therefore, people are unable to approach the doctors at early stage. This lead to permanent blindness within a few years" said the oration award winner Dr G Chandrasekhar of Hyderabad.

People with over 40 years of age suffering from diabetes and have family history of glaucoma are at high risk to catch the disease. Thus, they should go for eye check-up at regular intervals of 1-2 years. "We have technology to operate cataract by placing lenses in eyes without administrating drops of anaesthesia. There is only a need to create awareness among people about comprehensive check-up from eye-specialist for glaucoma," said Dr Chandrasekhar.

Excerpt from:
'Glaucoma is symptomless, leads to blindness in few yrs' | Indore ... - Times of India

Read More...

Faces: Facial Blindness – WCVB Boston

Saturday, June 3rd, 2017

Faces: Facial Blindness

Meet two people who suffer from Prosopagnosia, or facial blindness a condition that leaves them unable to recognize friends and family.

Updated: 8:00 PM EDT May 31, 2017

WEBVTT >> THIS IS CHRONICLE ON WCVBCHANNEL 5.>> THE FAMOUS FACE LOOKSFAMILIAR?>> I HAVE NO IDEA WHO THAT IS.>> EVEN THE MIRROR LEAVES HIMUNSURE.>> THERE IS A LACK OFRECOGNITION.>> THESE TWO MEN SUFFER FROM AMYSTERIOUS CONDITION, FACIALBLINDNESS.AND A SURGEON TO MAKE HER ABETTER WOMAN.>> I KNOW HE WOULD MAKE ME LOOKLIKE I WAS BORN NATURALLY LIKETHAT.>> THE AMAZING GERMAN -- THEAMAZING JOURNEY.>> ABOUT FACE.NEXT ON CHRONICLE.>> GOOD EVENING.SINCE BIRTH BROKE HAS HADTROUBLE RECOGNIZING EMILY,COWORKERS, EVEN HIMSELF.HE SUFFERS FACIAL BLINDNESS, ACONDITION BOTH MYSTERIOUS ANDINCURABLE.>> IMAGINE GOING TO WORK EVERYDAY AND NOT BEING ABLE TORECOGNIZE FELLOW WORKERS.IT IS A PROBLEM RICK FACESDAILY.NOT JUST AT WORK BUT AT HOMEWITH HIS ENTIRE FAMILY.HE HAS A RARE CONDITION KNOWN ASFACIAL BLIND.HE HAS DEVELOPED STRATEGIES FORTELLING PEOPLE APART.>> BY THEIR POSTURE, THEIRSHOULDERS.BEARD, NO BEER.VOICE.GAIT IS A BIG THING.I CAN SEE SOMEBODY HALF A BLOCKAWAY FROM ME AND RECOGNIZE THEM.>> IT IS WHAT YOU SEE IN TURN AFACE UPSIDE DOWN.>> IT IS A NEUROLOGICAL PROBLEMTHAT SCIENTISTS DON'T FULLYUNDERSTAND AND SO FAR CANNOTFIX.>> IF I TURN A FACE UPSIDE DOWNYOU WOULD KNOW THE EYES AND THEMOUTH WAS THERE, YOU JUST CAN'TPERCEIVE IT WITH THE SAME WAY.>> THEY HAVE A PROBLEMCOMPREHENDING RACIALEXPRESSIONS.>> I'M NOT REALLY SURE WHAT MOODYOU ARE IN.>> THE FACE CONTAINS LOTS OFINFORMATION.IT'S HARD TO UNDERESTIMATE HOWMUCH INFORMATION WE GET.WE CAN FIGURE HOW THAT PERSONIS.WE GET IDENTITY FROM THE FACE.WE ARE ALSO GETTING FACIALEXPRESSIONS AND DETERMINING WHATPEOPLE ARE THINKING ABOUT.>> RICK WAS BORN WITH FACIALBLINDNESS BUT WASN'T DIAGNOSEDUNTIL A FEW YEARS AGO.FINALLY IT MADE SENSE WHY HENEVER RECOGNIZED HIMSELF IN AMIRROR.>> I KNOW IT IS ME BECAUSE I'MSTANDING THERE AND I KNOW WHAT ILOOK LIKE.BUT I'VE HAD TIMES WHERE I HAVELOOKED AT MY FACE AND FOUND ITTO BE UNSETTLING.IT WOULD BE THIS ODD FEELING OFA LACK OF RECOGNITION.>> I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU ASERIES OF FAMOUS FACES.>> HE HAS COME TO DARTMOUTH TOTAKE PART IN THE FACIALBLINDNESS STUDIES.>> I HAVE NO IDEA WHO THAT IS.>> HE DEVELOPED IT AFTER FALLINGOFF OF A LETTER TO YEARS AGO.IT HAS BEEN EXTREMELY DIFFICULTFOR HIS WIFE OF NEARLY 30 YEARS,THE WIFE H DOESN'T ALWAYSRECOGNIZE.>> HE WOULD REFER TO ME AS HISWIFE.I KNEW HE HAD A HARD TIMERECALLING THE KIDS.HE DIDN'T HAVE NAMES.HE WENT INSIDE AND SAW SOMEBODYTHAT LOOKS LIKE ME.HE REALIZED I WAS OUTSIDE ANDCOULDN'T MAKE THE CONNECTION OFHOW I COULD BE OUTSIDE AND INTHE GROCERY STORE.SOMEBODY FAMILIAR LOOKING WASACTUALLY NOT ME.>> IT WAS HEARTBREAKING FOR HER.I MAKE A MENTAL NOTE OF WHAT SHEWEARS THAT DAY.IF TWO WOMEN WERE STANDINGSIDE-BY-SIDE AND NO JEWELRY ORANYTHING, I WOULD HAVE NO IDEAUNTIL THEY SPOKE.>> I TRIED NOT TO THINK ABOUTIT.PEOPLE WOULD SAY HE KNOWS WHOYOU ARE.I WOULD SAY I DON'T THINK HEDOES.THEY WOULD SAY I'M SURE HE DOES.I DON'T TRY AND THINK ABOUT ITTOO MUCH BECAUSE IT'SHEARTBREAKING.>> IS NOT UNUSUAL FOR IT POSINGA REAL CHALLENGE TORELATIONSHIPS.>> PEOPLE HAVE RELATIONSHIPSTHAT HAVE BEEN LOST BECAUSE OFTHIS.PEOPLE TAKE IT PERSONALLY WHENYOU DON'T RECOGNIZE THEM.I'VE HAD PEOPLE TALK TO ME ABOUTROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS, THEYWALKED RIGHT PAST THE PERSON ONTHE STREET AND THE PERSON DIDN'TREACT WELL TO IT.>> SHE SAYS IT'S GETTING EASIERFOR THEM, HAVING A SENSE OFHUMOR HELPS.>> A POSTED A NOTE THAT SAID JIMREMEMBERED THAT HE PROPOSED TOME 30 YEARS AGO.BY DON'T RECOGNIZE YOUR FACE.>> I NEVER DOUBTED THAT HE LOVEDME OR KNEW WHO I WAS.HE STILL REMEMBERSCHARACTERISTICS ABOUT ME.THE FACT THAT HE COULD LOOK ATSEVERAL PEOPLE AND NOTSPECIFICALLY POINT ME OUT, I TRYNOT TO THINK ABOUT IT TOO MUCH.IT'S HEARTBREAKING.>> I'M NOT GOING TO ASK WHY.I REALLY WANT ASK WHAT IS NEXT.BY GODS'S GRACE I'M GOING TO BETHE FIRST PERSON TO BEAT FACIALBLINDNESS.>> PROBABLY PRESIDENT CLINTON.>> ANOTHER GROUP HAS ANOPPOSITE.THEY ALWAYS SAY I NEVER FORGET AFACE AND MEAN IT.SCIENTISTS CALL THEM SUPERRECOGNIZERS.THEY ARE VERY MUCH SOUGHT AFTERBY LAW ENFORCEMENT.HE MAKES MALE FACES MOREFEMININE.>> THE SHAPE OF HEARSE CALL, THESHAPE OF HER CHEEKS.

View post:
Faces: Facial Blindness - WCVB Boston

Read More...

Retinitis Pigmentosa | blindness.org

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

What is retinitis pigmentosa?

Retinitis pigmentosa, also known as RP, refers to a group of inherited diseases causing retinal degeneration. The retina is a thin piece of tissue lining the back of the eye. It converts light into electrical signals that the brain interprets as vision. People with RP experience a gradual decline in their vision, because photoreceptor cells in the retina degenerate.

Forms of RP and related diseases include Usher syndrome, Leber congenital amaurosis, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome, among others.

Back to top

Symptoms depend on whether rods or cones are initially involved. In most forms of RP, rods are affected first. Because rods are concentrated in the outer portions of the retina and are triggered by dim light, their degeneration affects peripheral and night vision. When the disease progresses and cones become affected, visual acuity, color perception, and central vision are diminished.

Night blindness is one of the earliest and most frequent symptoms of RP. People with mainly cone degeneration, however, first experience decreased central vision and reduced ability to discriminate colors and perceive details.

RP is typically diagnosed in adolescents and young adults. It is a progressive disorder. The rate of progression and degree of visual loss varies from person to person. Most people with RP are legally blind by age 40, with a central visual field of less than 20 degrees in diameter. It is a genetic disorder and, therefore, is almost always inherited.

Back to top

An estimated 100,000 people in the U.S. have RP, mainly caused by gene mutations (variations) inherited from one or both parents. Mutated genes give the wrong instructions to photoreceptor cells, telling them to make an incorrect protein or too little or too much protein. (Cells need the proper amount of particular proteins in order to function properly.) Mutations in dozens of genes have been linked to RP.

Genetic mutations can be passed from parent to offspring through one of three genetic inheritance patterns autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, or X-linked.

In autosomal recessive RP, both parents carry one copy of the mutated gene, but have no symptoms themselves. Children have a 25 percent chance of being affected by inheriting a mutated copy from each parent.

In autosomal dominant RP, usually one parent is affected and is the only parent with a mutated gene. A child has a 50 percent chance of being affected through the inheritance of the mutated gene from the parent.

In families with X-linked RP, the mother carries the mutated gene on an X chromosome, and her sons have a 50 percent chance of inheriting the condition. Daughters have a 50 percent chance of becoming carriers and arent usually affected. However, some daughters are affected sometimes mildly, sometimes severely.

If a family member is diagnosed with RP, it is strongly advised that other members of the family also have an eye exam by a physician who is specially trained to detect and treat retinal degenerative disorders. Genetic counselors are excellent resources for discussing inheritability, family planning, genetic testing, and other related issues.

Back to top

Genetic testing is available for RP. It helps assess the risk of passing the disorder from parent to offspring. It also helps with attaining an accurate diagnosis. A patient with an accurate diagnosis is in a better position to keep track of new findings, research developments, and treatment approaches.

Back to top

The Foundation is supporting several promising avenues of research, including gene, stem-cell, and drug therapies.

For the latest research advances for RP, refer to the Foundation publication Retinitis Pigmentosa: Research Advances.

This information was made possible through generous gifts from people like you. Please click here to make a donation to the Foundation.

*Images courtesy of the National Eye Institute, NIH

More here:
Retinitis Pigmentosa | blindness.org

Read More...

The Willful Blindness Of Sanctuary Cities – The Daily Caller

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

American sanctuary cities are established by politicians who presumably seek to protect illegal immigrants from what they see as inhumane U.S. deportation policies. But by ignoring federal requests to detain them, and instead releasing suspected and convicted illegal aliens back into the community, sanctuary cities open their doors wide to the creation of a wave of additional victims in their own communities.

To appreciate the threat, look no further than the tragically avoidable murder of Kate Steinle in sanctuary city San Francisco. Kates killer, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, was deported from the U.S. five times, was on probation, and had seven felony convictions. He used a stolen government handgun to fire three shots, one of which ended Kates life on a city pier. The San Francisco sheriffs office had opted to put Lopez-Sanchez back on the street rather than handing the felon over to ICE.

Few cases are as tragic and expose the risks more clearly than Kates, which demonstrates the fact that subsequent crimes committed by criminal illegal aliens released despite the existence of ICE detainers are preventable. And the very evident risks to those new victims are what sanctuary cities willfully ignore.

There are hundreds of jurisdictions with sanctuary policies across the country. More and more are loudly vocal about their resistance; their primary cry is to accuse the Trump administration of leading a frontal attack on millions of illegal immigrants who are merely trying to eek out an existence in a better place than their homeland. In truth, the Administration is attempting to rid the country of the relatively few criminal illegal aliens whove chosen to prey on our citizens and on other undocumented aliens. To succeed, they need the assistance of state and local law enforcement authorities.

Sanctuary cities defy federal immigration authorities detainer requests, citing the reality that immigration is a federal responsibility and claiming the Feds cant impose their responsibilities on local officers without their consent. Simply put, the performance of a federal job in immigration enforcement by state and local jurisdictions is voluntary.

But the Federal government can encourage local support of immigration enforcement by conditioning the receipt of certain federal funds on cooperation with immigration functions. ICE detainers are one of the primary means used to identify and remove criminal illegal aliens from the interior of the United States. But when local sanctuary policies obstruct or ignore detainer requests and release criminal aliens back into the community, the communities are anything but more safe as a result.

A Department of Justices (DOJ) analysis in October 2014 showed that between January 1 and August 31, 2014, ICE documented 8,145 declined detainers covering individuals in 276 counties in 43 states including the District of Columbia. Of the 8145 illegal immigrants for whom detainers were declined, more than 5000 (62%) were previously charged or convicted of a crime or presented some other safety concern. Almost 3000 had prior felony charges or convictions and almost 2000 had prior misdemeanor convictions or charges to include those related to violence, threats, assaults, sexual abuse and unlawful possession of firearm or other deadly weapon.

Thats 60% of the releasees known to have committed prior crimes. Of course another segment certainly did commit prior crimes but had yet to be identified or charged. An acceptable risk? Release policies that somehow make the community safer? Not at all.

Recidivism in the illegal immigrant community can be every bit as common as in the broader population. The DOJ report also found of those 8,145 releasees, 23% had a subsequent criminal arrest and were charged with 4,298 offenses in just the eight month period covered by the report.

The bigger picture is grimmer. A separate DOJ report on recidivism tracked over 400,000 prisoners released in 30 states in 2005 and followed for five years.

The report found more than two thirds of the prisoners were rearrested within three years of release and more than 75% were rearrested within five years. The 400,000-plus prisoners followed accounted for almost 1.2 million arrests. Translating that recidivism rate to released criminal illegal immigrants in the DOJ study suggests over 6200 would be rearrested within five years, responsible for more than 18,000 total arrests.

The DOJ detainer report documented egregious crimes committed by criminal illegal aliens on unsuspecting, law abiding people to include murder, child sexual abuse, rape, resisting an officer causing death or severe bodily injury and other serious crimes.

Criminal illegal aliens held in sanctuary city jails, including those with a litany of prior crimes, are being released into our communities. They will commit future crimes resulting in death, sexual assault, robbery, burglary and others. They will cause great physical and psychological harm to Americans and other illegal immigrants alike. The future crimes are preventable if communities wake up to their obligation to protect their own citizens first.

No family should suffer the same fate as Kate Steinles.

W. Stephen Thayer is an associate of the Law Enforcement Action Network, a former U.S Attorney and New Hampshire Supreme Court justice.

Original post:
The Willful Blindness Of Sanctuary Cities - The Daily Caller

Read More...

World-first trials have been launched to treat Parkinson’s and … – ScienceAlert

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

In a world first, surgeons in the Chinese city of Zhengzhou are planning to inject stem cells derived from human embryos into the brains of patients with Parkinson's disease with the aim of treating their debilitating symptoms.

Meanwhile, another medical team in the same city is aiming to target vision loss using embryonic stem cells (ESC) to replace lost cells in the retina, marking a new direction in China in the wake of major changes in how the country regulates stem cell treatments.

While similar treatments on Parkinson's patients have already been tested in Australia, those trials relied on cells taken from eggs that were forced to divide without first being fertilised in an effort to circumvent any ethical concerns.

Stem cells are a little like blank slates that are yet to take on a specific task. If you rewind the clock on any of your body's tissues, its cells will become less specialised, until you're left with a cell with a lot of potential to become nearly anything.

In the case of both kinds of embryonic stem cells, divided egg cells are subjected to various treatments to encourage them to develop into replacement cells that could treat a condition in a recipient.

The symptoms of Parkinson's disease are largely caused by a loss of nervous tissue deep inside the brain in an area called the basal ganglia.

Losing those cells means a loss of a neurotransmitter called dopamine, and with it a lower ability to control nervous impulses that would prevent muscles in the extremities from activating.

In the case of a condition called macular degeneration, damage to a layer of tissue called the retinal pigment epithelium at the back of the eye causes the light-catching cells above it to die.

By turning ESC into cells that can naturally develop into the tissues that have deteriorated such as the precursors to neurons that can produce dopamine, or into retinal tissue and then injecting it into the target site, the researchers hope to improve the lost functions.

Not everybody is convinced of the success of trials such as those being done in China and last year in Australia.

A stem cell biologist from the Scripps Research Institute in California, Jeanne Loring, believes the choice of cell used in both Parkinson's disease trials won't be specialised enough to match expected results.

"Not knowing what the cells will become is troubling," Loring told David Cyranoski at Nature.

But the research team in China remains confident in its decision.

Qi Zhou from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Zoology in Beijing is the stem cell specialist leading both sets of ESC trials, and says four years of animal trials conducted on monkeys have so far showed promising results.

"We have all the imaging data, behavioural data, and molecular data to support efficacy," Zhou told Nature.

He also claims the team conducting the Parkinson's trial have been selective with their potential candidates, choosing patients who will have the least chance of rejecting the ESCs from the cell bank.

In 2015, China introduced tough new regulations to deal with the growing problem of 'rogue clinics' offering stem cell treatments without due record keeping or process, making it hard to evaluate safety, or even the types of cells used in the treatments.

The changes are set to improve the ethics and safety of stem cell treatments by enforcing the use of cells through a regulatory body, ensuring informed patient consent, and permitting treatments only through authorised hospitals.

Time will tell if the regulations can be enforced, but for stem cell researchers, the changes are positive.

"It will be a major new direction for China," stem cell scientist Pei Xuetaotold Nature.

If the results are as good as the teams in Australia and China predict, it could also set new standards for the world.

See the article here:
World-first trials have been launched to treat Parkinson's and ... - ScienceAlert

Read More...

Aaronsburg man doesn’t let blindness slow him down – Centre Daily Times

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

Centre Daily Times
Aaronsburg man doesn't let blindness slow him down
Centre Daily Times
And heavy too, at least judging by the size of the equipment eating up space in Ron Ream's barn-turned-wood-working emporium. Ream was gracious enough to give me a guy who once nicked himself on a rolling pin a rundown of some of the grizzlier ...

Here is the original post:
Aaronsburg man doesn't let blindness slow him down - Centre Daily Times

Read More...

Systemic Blindness – Seeking Alpha

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

MF Global failed on a trade that would have made it enormously profitable. AIG's (NYSE:AIG) portfolios of "toxic waste" ended up making money - for the Federal Reserve. Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers were ended like the others by liquidity, not losses. SemGroup (NYSE:SEMG) was another firm that went into bankruptcy during that period, but one that practically no one has heard of. It failed for largely the same deficiency.

Based in Tulsa, Oklahoma, SemGroup at one time employed 2,000 people in ostensibly the oil distribution business. The company handled 500,000 barrels of crude a day through two pipelines, using its 6.7 million barrels of storage capacity to do what oil companies do. Almost all that capacity was located in Cushing, Oklahoma, today's dumping ground for energy making up the WTI benchmark.

It wasn't the oil business specifically that ruined SemGroup, but rather oil trading. The company and especially senior management were convinced the oil market was behaving irrationally all throughout 2007 and into early 2008. There was, in their estimation, simply no reason for skyrocketing prices. They bet against it; heavily. The company was short so much oil that at one point corporate headquarters skimmed $54 million from a $120 million loan provided by GE Capital to build a pipeline from Colorado to Cushing to cover margin to maintain their shorts.

As is usually the case, SemGroup just couldn't withstand the collateral calls on them as WTI, Brent, and every other benchmark seemed headed, unreasonably, to the moon. They made one final, enormous short, one that would pay off to the tune of $5 billion - if only they could make it just two more weeks. The company couldn't, and on July 22 it was forced into bankruptcy court just days before it would have been proved fabulously correct about the oil market.

On July 15, 2008, Ben Bernanke testified before the Senate opining, wrongly, as usual, on many topics including oil prices. In his remarks, the Fed Chairman sketched out what sounded like balanced risks; weakness due to housing but with inflation that could keep on rising, as if the two opposing forces would somehow yield a Goldilocks result where the US might avoid recession altogether by nothing more than luck.

However, in light of the persistent escalation of commodity prices in recent quarters, FOMC participants viewed the inflation outlook as unusually uncertain and cited the possibility that commodity prices will continue to rise as an important risk to the inflation forecast. Moreover, the currently high level of inflation, if sustained, might lead the public to revise up its expectations for longer-term inflation. If that were to occur, and those revised expectations were to become embedded in the domestic wage- and price-setting process, we could see an unwelcome rise in actual inflation over the longer term.

The possibility of higher energy prices, tighter credit conditions, and a still-deeper contraction in housing markets all represent significant downside risks to the outlook for growth. At the same time, upside risks to the inflation outlook have intensified lately, as the rising prices of energy and some other commodities have led to a sharp pickup in inflation and some measures of inflation expectations have moved higher.

What some people took away from that testimony was that the Fed was out of the "stimulus" business any more than they were already forced into up until and immediately after Bear Stearns. Whatever slim hope there might have been on the inside of money markets for a further necessary rescue disappeared. The Fed, as Bernanke described, felt it warranted to worry about weak demand as well as commodity prices going the other way, hoping in the best case that the two would just cancel each other out avoiding recession altogether.

It was a fundamental error, of course, on many accounts, not the least of which was the precarious state of overall economic demand being led downward by a global money system that persisted in a state of malfunction. Bernanke had essentially fooled himself into thinking that things weren't so bad after all, and the oil market helped him into that position for reasons that SemGroup was right to suspect.

Oil prices rose throughout 2007 and early 2008 on the idea that the Fed would overdo its response. It was widely believed that the central bank could achieve a resolution, and in being careful given the gravity of the situation would err too far on the side of "stimulus."

It was predicated on nothing more than the idea that interest rate cuts were liquidity, or at least the impetus for the private system to provide it. Yet, from August 9, 2007, forward, there was in several key prices a constant reminder that this just was not the case. Apart from monetary conditions, it worked out the same way in economic statistics where in the mainstream, nurtured by Bernanke's optimism as well as oil prices, often severe economic warnings were simply dismissed in favor of optimism for no other reason than this conditioned disbelief.

The oil market was irrational, and in mid-July 2008, it started to become rational again. It was too late for SemGroup, but what is relevant to our current condition is that irrationality in terms of some expectations would continue. In November 2008, for example, a Time Magazine article even blamed the prospect for a bankruptcy liquidation in SemGroup assets for the drastic drop in oil prices.

Clearly, demand for oil didn't fall that much, but the price of oil isn't set by demand alone. It's the product of an extremely volatile mixture of speculation, oil production, weather, government policies, the global economy, the number of miles the average American is driving in any given week and so on.

No, oil demand did fall by that much and would fall much further before it was all over. Economic demand not only cratered, it has yet to recover almost nine years later, leaving oil investors as well as economic commentary stuck in a conundrum that really isn't one. Just like the Fed has more recently created a puzzle out of the very low unemployment rate and the lack of wage growth, explanations for oil's lack of follow-through into full reflation always contain the same color of 2008-type mistakes. It is almost certainly recency bias where now the word "recency" doesn't really apply. People just can't (or won't) believe at these times the world could be stuck in such a bad place.

For oil in 2017, it takes on more than just shale or OPEC proportions. Crude prices are it, and have been "it" in both directions. The collapse in late 2014 was a crucial signal about global prospects, which again officials all over the world tried their best to characterize as something it wasn't ("supply glut"). The same to a lesser extent has happened again, this time over-emphasizing the rise in oil prices from the February 2016 trough as more than it is - or was.

That flirtation, however, has now ended; at least with oil trading in a clear downward pattern going all the way back to late February (lower highs and lower lows).

Psychologically, while it aided "reflation" in that oil prices were up on an annual comparison basis, as of now, they no longer are. The closing price today is slightly less in WTI than the closing price on May 31, 2016. I have written before that oil prices were not really up, they were merely down less than last year. Now even that first part is no longer technically true. Year-over-year WTI has regained its minus sign.

This is no trivial matter for oil as well as broader matters. The Fed searches for inflation because the unemployment rate is 4.5% when this renewed downward comparison in oil tells us exactly why they won't find it. As in 2008, they are looking for demand that simply isn't there.

Even the oil futures curve demonstrates as much. Though it remains in slight contango, the curve of late has slipped entirely below $50. That is an enormously pessimistic take on oil fundamentals, and one that is different proportionally than the more-in-contango curve earlier this year under the sentimental upturn of "reflation."

In truth, unlike the irrationality of oil in early 2008 the trajectory of oil prices has been far more rational this time around. It surged from the bottom, but for a full year now has traded almost perfectly sideways. Like so many other economic accounts, it is conspicuous only for the lack of further momentum when by all historical expectations it and the global economy should be well into unmistakable recovery.

I have to believe that the lack of further price gains have been because unlike nine years ago by now the oil market is totally aware of how powerless the Federal Reserve actually is; and that liquidity, meaning global money, and therefore economic considerations, are completely unlike how all are characterized (glowingly) in the mainstream. After all, the price collapsed at the very moment Janet Yellen and all those economists like her were most sure demand was about to truly take off, and that under QE there was no possible way for further deflation or disinflation caused by dangerous monetary illiquidity.

Bernanke in July 2008 was using a world that didn't actually exist to make all the wrong moves and say all the wrong things. Somehow, after so much time and proof, a great many people still don't see it.

Read more here:
Systemic Blindness - Seeking Alpha

Read More...

Blindness and rage review: Brian Castro plays his customary literary … – The Sydney Morning Herald

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

Photo: Supplied

Fiction Blindness and Rage: A Phantasmagoria Brian Castro Giramondo, $26.95

Throughout a distinguished career that began in 1983 with Birds of Passage, Brian Castro has consistently played intricate games with language and with literary and cultural allusions. This playfulness often extends to echoes of the lives and works of writers as diverse as Kafka (notably in After China) and, in Drift, the little-known English experimental novelist B. S. Johnson, who died in 1973.

Many diverse elements enter into the fabric of Castro's always intriguing though sometimes opaque works. Looking back over his career, it seems that finding the appropriate form for his often unusual preoccupations hasn't always been successful. There often seems to be a conflict between the demands of narrative and what really engages Castro's intellect and imagination.

His latest work has, I think, found a solution to that conundrum. Described as "a novel in 34 cantos", Blindness and Rage recounts the adventures, mostly in Paris, of the Adelaide-based writer-cum-town-planner Lucien Gracq. Cast mostly in a kind of free verse made up of lines of different lengths with the frequent use of rhymes, half-rhymes, internal rhymes and alliteration this form gives Castro greater scope for doing what he seems to like doing best, and is often very good at doing.

Blindness and Rage hops from arcane topic to arcane topic, from Adelaide to Paris to China and Hong Kong with a disarming nonchalance unconstrained by the need to tell a coherent tale. Not all of it is completely comprehensible, at least on a first (or second) reading, but most of it is lively, striking and even exhilarating.

The narrative, such as it is, is straightforward enough. Gracq has been diagnosed with a terminal liver condition. He decides to spend his last days numbering 53 he'd been assured, he insists several times in Paris.

He moves into a small flat near the Jardin des Plantes, and comes into contact with a shadowy group of savants, Le club des fugitifs, which offers writers who are about to die the chance to ascribe their last work to another person. Gracq is accepted into the club, intending to bestow on it his epic poem based on cultural and anthropological theories of play. He also has a brief flirtation with Catherine Bourgeois, a concert pianist, whose flat is on the same landing as his.

Castro constructs a bewildering array of allusions, quotations, literary jokes and puns around this narrative kernel. They are far too many to detail in a short review. Here are a few. At one stage Gracq considers travelling to Amsterdam to enlist the services of "the infamous Dr Nietzsche" and his euthanasia-computer. There are references to Pushkin and Kafka again, to modern French writers such as Georges Bataille and to the 18th-century pornographer Restif de la Bretonne, de Sade's antagonist. One could go on and on.

The topography of Paris also provides important elements to this "phantasmagoria", none more so than the area around the Jardin des Plantes. Gracq rents a flat at 11 Rue Linne. As it turns out the "Fugitives" hold their raucous meetings next door at No.13. The man who acts as Gracq's sponsor is called Georges Crepe their first meeting took place in a creperie near the place where 16 Carmelite nuns were guillotined in 1794.

Such random bits and pieces come together, as often with Castro, in the literary figure standing behind Gracq's adventures. Georges Perec (his surname an anagram, of course, of Crepe) spent the last years of his life at 13 Rue Linne. He was a member of OuLiPo, an eccentric group of writers, almost all of whom flit across the pages of Blindness and Rage.

Finally, Gracq was told he had 53 days left to live when he moved to Paris, and Perec's last, unfinished, work was a novel entitled 53 Days, conceived during the 53 days he spent in Australia a few months before his death. Fifty-three was also the number of days Stendhal supposed to have needed to write The Charterhouse of Parma, a factoid that might have inspired both Castro and Perec.

After all this, read Blindness and Rage and prepare to be enthralled and sometimes exasperated.

See the article here:
Blindness and rage review: Brian Castro plays his customary literary ... - The Sydney Morning Herald

Read More...

Non-invasive, effective contact lenses and glasses to treat glaucoma, prevent blindness – Medical Xpress

Friday, June 2nd, 2017

June 1, 2017 An off-the-shelf contact lens with a gold trace and a specially equipped pair of glasses could provide a non-invasive, personalized therapy to treat and prevent elevated intra-ocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. The technology is being developed by Bionode LLC, a Purdue-related startup co-founded by Purdue professor Pedro Irazoqui and Murray I. Firestone. Credit: Purdue Research Foundation/Vince Walter image

A Purdue-affiliated startup, Bionode LLC, is developing a wearable neuro-modulation device that could be used as a non-invasive, personalized therapy to treat and prevent elevated intra-ocular pressure in patients diagnosed with glaucoma.

The technology was developed in Purdue's Center for Implantable Devices by Pedro Irazoqui, professor of electrical and computer engineering and biomedical engineering and lead at the center. Irazoqui serves as chief technology officer of Bionode. The company was co-founded by Irazoqui and Murray I. Firestone, CEO of Bionode.

"Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in the world behind cataracts. Intraocular pressure is caused when the eye either produces too much fluid into the aqueous humor or the eye does not drain properly. The pressure then goes up. Over time, that pressure damages the optic nerve and ultimately results in blindness," said Firestone. "Current treatments for glaucoma suffer serious limitations concerning patient compliance, side effects, and efficacy. There is need for a non-invasive, effective treatment for glaucoma that solves these issues."

Bionode's technology utilizes an off-the-shelf contact lens and a pair of glasses.

"All we do to the contact lens is add a single trace of gold. That trace of gold receives an electromagnetic field that we transmit from a specially equipped pair of glasses to convert the field into a current. The current is then delivered to a very specific part of the eye's anatomy to achieve the desired therapy," Irazoqui said. "Our device can electrically stimulate the muscles around Schlemm's canal, the structure where fluid leaves the eye, to decrease the impedance to fluid flow and, thus, decrease pressure. There's no surgery, it's not invasive, it's just a contact lens that you wear with a pair of glasses and it takes about five minutes to work and has no known side effects."

The video will load shortly

Irazoqui said the Bionode platform overcomes the limitations of existing treatments.

"Current treatments for glaucoma include eye drops which have side effects and low patient compliance and they eventually stop working. There is the option of laser eye surgery which you can do a maximum of a couple times, and beyond that there is a blood procedure, which is an open wound in the eye that leaks liquid whenever pressure goes up, this has terrible risks for infection. Additionally, all these methods take about three months to work," he said. "Most patients who opt for these solutions have visual loss within about 10 to 15 years and by 15 to 20 years go blind. The Bionode platform could be the first line of defense for Glaucoma patients."

Bionode is working to conduct a clinical trial of 100 patients to demonstrate the durability and effectiveness of its platform.

"Currently we have a working prototype and we are seeking $1.5 million in funding to conduct a full human clinical trial. We have partnered with a clinician who owns two ophthalmology institutes, one in Madrid and one in Barcelona, Spain. He is an internationally renowned ophthalmologist," Irazoqui said. "Our goal is to complete that large clinical trial, apply for CE Mark approval, and file for a FDA de Novo approval in the United States."

Firestone added that in the future the company may also look into the Bionode platforms' usefulness in post-traumatic stress disorder, urinary incontinence, gastric disorders and more.

Explore further: Researcher explores best treatments for glaucoma

Researchers at Queen's University Belfast together with University of St Andrews and Aberdeen have found that the procedure used to remove cataracts is more successful than current standard treatments with laser in treating ...

Glaucoma, a leading cause of blindness worldwide, most often is diagnosed during a routine eye exam. Over time, elevated pressure inside the eye damages the optic nerve, leading to vision loss. Unfortunately, there's no way ...

People with high-risk glaucoma will be able to monitor their disease, anywhere, anytime, thanks to a new device developed by an FIU professor.

A new device that slowly releases eye medication may one day be a promising option for the many glaucoma patients who struggle with administering their own daily prescription eye drops. New research shows a medicated silicone ...

Patients with age-related macular degeneration who received seven or more eye injections of the drug bevacizumab annually had a higher risk of having glaucoma surgery, according to a study published online by JAMA Ophthalmology.

A contact lens designed to deliver medication gradually to the eye could improve outcomes for patients with conditions requiring treatment with eye drops, which are often imprecise and difficult to self-administer. In a study ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read more:
Non-invasive, effective contact lenses and glasses to treat glaucoma, prevent blindness - Medical Xpress

Read More...

Secrets of summer blindness in salmon revealed – TheFishSite.com

Wednesday, May 31st, 2017

News

The exact nature of the link between sea temperature and blindness in salmon has been established by scientists at Norways National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES).

Farmed salmon often lose their sight in summer, when rising temperatures cause cataracts that make their eyes opaque, which is a serious welfare problem.

These are permanent damages to the lens. The worst case scenario is that the vision is so impaired that the fish cannot see the feed, stop eating and stop growing, said Sofie Rem, scientist at NIFES.

Since salmon is cold-blooded, the body temperature is the same as the temperature of the water. The optimal temperature for Atlantic salmon is about 13 degrees. If it gets warmer than that, the salmon will not perform as well and be at greater risk of developing cataracts, she added. In nature, wild salmon can move to deeper and colder waters when temperatures rise, but that is not a possibility in sea cages. The past summers have seen periods of high seawater temperatures in Norway, and Rem says that many fish farmers contact NIFES with questions about cataracts during such periods.

Summer is the cataracts season. Since we are facing climate changes, the ocean temperatures will become even warmer, which makes it important to have knowledge about what happens to fish when the temperature rises so that we can safeguard their health and welfare, she explained.

Oxidative and osmotic stress

The NIFES study demonstrates that several changes take place in the lens when water temperatures rise. - not least that the lens runs out of antioxidants. The antioxidants protect the lens from damage, and when there is not enough of them, the proteins are destroyed and white spots form in the lens. This is called oxidative stress.

The lens is a small sphere of transparent protein. It is a little like egg white, which also consists of transparent protein. When the egg is cooked, the proteins are destroyed and turn white. Something similar happens in the eye of a salmon when the proteins are destroyed, and they are no longer transparent, said Rem.

At the same time, the lens changes in a way that resembles the changes seen in people who develop cataracts due to diabetes. The blood sugar levels of salmon living in the warmest water increased, and this had consequences for the lens.

When the blood sugar level rises, there is an overload of sugar in the lens, and we see an accumulation of sugar alcohol, Rem reflected. This causes problems with the water balance in the lens.

The lens must contain the correct amount of water in order to remain transparent. If it swells up or dries out, this could damage the cells and result in cataract formation. Scientists call this osmotic stress.

The scientists noticed that the lenses of salmon living in the warmest water had a lower ability to regulate this balance because they had less osmolytes, whose function is to transport water out of the cells.

Increasing prevalence

Cataracts have only been a major problem in aquaculture the past 20 years. Before that, animal by-products such as blood meal were used in fish feed, but this practice was discontinued in the 1990s due to the perceived risk of transferring BSE. Without the blood meal, and with less fishmeal in the feed, farmed salmon lost an important source of histidine.

Histidine is an essential amino acid, which makes it an important building block in proteins. In addition, this amino acid can function as an antioxidant and osmolyte. This means that histidine can both protect the cells from oxidative stress and help maintain the water balance in the lens, which is why histidine can protect against cataract development.

The salmon has to get all the histidine it needs to cover the nutritional requirement through the feed. However, not all of the raw materials used in feed production contain enough histidine, and therefore it is common practice to add synthetic histidine to the feed. The scientists at NIFES have previously found that Atlantic salmon need almost twice as much histidine to minimize cataracts, as it needs to sustain growth. This is particularly important right after the smolt are transferred to sea cages and when the temperature rises. However, this is not always enough to eliminate cataracts.

We have identified the underlying causes of why salmon are more susceptible to cataracts during the summer. This will form the basis for further work to increase robustness of the fish when facing environmental changes, Rem concluded.

Link:
Secrets of summer blindness in salmon revealed - TheFishSite.com

Read More...

ProQR’s QR-110 Fast Track’d for rare pediatric blindness; shares ahead 3% premarket – Seeking Alpha

Wednesday, May 31st, 2017

The FDA designates Orphan Drug-tagged ProQR Therapeutics' (NASDAQ:PRQR) QR-110 for Fast Track review for the treatment of Leber's Congenital Amaurosis Type 10 (LCA 10), a genetic disorder characterized by the progressive loss of vision in the first few years of life. It is caused by a mutation that results in abnormal splicing of messenger RNA (mRNA) which results in the non-functioning of a key protein called CEP920.

QR-110, an RNA-based oligonucleotide, is designed to restore the normal splicing of messenger RNA to enable fully functioning CEP920 to be produced. It is administered via intravitreal injections in the eye.

Fast Track status provides for more frequent interactions with the FDA review team and a rolling review of the New Drug Application (NDA).

Top-line results from an early-stage, open-label study, PQ-110-001, should be available next year.

Shares are up3%premarket but only on 70 shares.

More:
ProQR's QR-110 Fast Track'd for rare pediatric blindness; shares ahead 3% premarket - Seeking Alpha

Read More...

5 Unexpected Things That Can Make You Go Blind – Women’s Health

Wednesday, May 31st, 2017

Women's Health
5 Unexpected Things That Can Make You Go Blind
Women's Health
You might be surprised to learn that blindness has a gender bias. Most people aren't aware that two-thirds of people who are blind are women, says Assumpta Madu, M.D., an ophthalmologist at NYU Langone. There's a much larger preponderance to ...

View post:
5 Unexpected Things That Can Make You Go Blind - Women's Health

Read More...

The left’s blindness on terrorism, Kushner’s getting mugged by the media & other comments – New York Post

Wednesday, May 31st, 2017

Crime expert: The Lefts Blindness on Terrorism

The Left responded to the Manchester bombing with feckless calls for resisting hate, pledges of renewed diversity and little else, laments Heather Mac Donald at City Journal. Yet nothing that an Islamic terrorist can do will ever shake the left-wing commitment to open borders. Indeed, it seems the real threat that radical Islam poses . . . must be disregarded in order to transform the West by Third World immigration. As for improved anti-terror intelligence, the Left still decries the modest expansions of surveillance power under the 2001 Patriot Act as the work of totalitarianism. But terrorists dont care if an attack is met with candlelight vigils they care if border restrictions and law enforcement make it impossible to destroy lives. They will only have failed when they can no longer slaughter children.

Ex-attorney: Kushners Getting Media Mugged

Todays mainstream news media have turned into the mob as a ruling class, charges Fox News Greg Jarrett. And the latest victim is White House counselor Jared Kushner, whose crime appears to be no crime at all. The fact that he met with two Russian officials has produced mass hysteria in both print and television with no attempts at reasoned analysis, no context of historical precedence. Nearly every single president, he notes, has established and relied on similar back channel contacts and had discussions with foreign governments before taking office, including President Obama. As for Kushner being a focus of the FBIs Russia probe, that simply means the Bureau would like to speak with him. Reporter: Albany Wont Even Fake Ethics Reform

Ever since President Trump fired US Attorney Preet Bharara, Albany lawmakers have breathed a sigh of relief and seemingly stopped pretending to care about ethics reform, notes Ashley Hupfl at City State. This year, Gov. Cuomo proposed the usual ethics reforms he has included for the past few years, but little was done to include them in the state budget. He blames the Legislature, saying its members have no appetite for more. Yet allegations of corruption have continued to dog lawmakers, most recently in the controversy over leadership stipends paid to legislators who dont actually chair their committees. But given Cuomos stance that virtually everything got done in the budget, it appears unlikely there will be any ethics reforms toward the end of the session. Conservative take: Should Insecure Dems Be Coddled?

What do Democrats want? asks Noah Rothman at Commentary. The answer: Nothing so much as to have their assumptions validated. Which is why telling liberals what they want to hear can be a materially rewarding enterprise. Indeed, committed liberal activists do not want to change to meet the moment. Rather, they want an excuse to view their opponents as dangerously outside the mainstream, deserving only of exile. Thats the message Hillary Clinton, for one, is delivering. But not every Democrat is giving in to their partys darkest, most self-destructive impulses. Like Sen. Cory Booker, whose refusal to leap to the firm conclusion that the presidency has been sold to Moscow and that all thats preventing impeachment proceedings is the congressional GOPs cowardice is, in a way, an act of courage. From the right: Sad Decline of the Shopping Mall

Time was, recalls Kevin Williamson at National Review, when the American shopping mall was the reincarnation of the downtown business district, moved indoors where it could be air-conditioned and efficiently policed. Yet now this new downtown is dying were down to 1,100 malls (400 of which are soon set to close) from the high-water mark of 5,000. But shops and jobs go together: One in ten employed Americans works in retail, and they tend to be workers who for various reasons sometimes lack of skill and education, but also things such as the need for flexible scheduling or physical limitations often do not have a great many desirable options. The real crisis is not so much a matter of jobs lost in the present but of jobs that never come into being in the future.

Compiled by Eric Fettmann

See the original post here:
The left's blindness on terrorism, Kushner's getting mugged by the media & other comments - New York Post

Read More...

Page 49«..1020..48495051..60..»


2025 © StemCell Therapy is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS) | Violinesth by Patrick